Stewards/elections 2011/votes/wpedzich

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning
English: The 2011 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
Suomi: Vuoden 2011 ylivalvojien vaalit on loppu. Uusia ääniä ei hyväksytä enää.
العربية: انتخابات المضيفين لعام 2011 انتهت. لا أصوات أخرى سيتم قبولها.
Deutsch: Die Stewardwahlen 2011 sind beendet. Weitere Stimmen können nicht mehr berücksichtigt werden.
Español : Las elecciones a Steward del año 2011 han concluído. No se aceptan más votos.
فارسی: .رای‌گیری در مورد انتخابات ویکیبدهای جدید پایان یافته است.رای‌های جدید مورد قبول واقع نخواهد شد. [update needed: en]
Français : Les élections Steward de 2011 sont terminées. Il n'est plus possible de voter.
Gaeilge: Tá na toghcháin Maoir 2011 dúnta anois. Ní féidir aon vótaí eile a glacadh as an am seo amach.
Galego: Xa remataron as eleccións a steward do ano 2011. Non se aceptarán máis votos.
Alemannisch : D Stewardwahle 2011 sin umme. Du chasch nimmi abstimme.
עברית: בחירות הדיילים לשנת 2011 הסתיימו. הצבעות נוספות לא תתקבלנה. [update needed: en]
Magyar: A választás lezárult, további szavazatokat nem fogadunk el. [update needed: en]
Italiano: Le elezioni del 2011 a Steward sono terminate. Nessun voto ricevuto dopo questa data sarà preso in considerazione.
日本語: 2011年のスチュワード選挙は終わりました。今後の投票は受け付けられません。
Nederlands: De stewardsverkiezingen van 2011 zijn gesloten. U kunt niet meer stemmen.
Polski: Wybory stewardów w 2011 roku zakończyły się. Nowe głosy nie będą akceptowane.
Português : As eleições para Steward de 2011 estão encerradas. Nenhum voto lançado a partir desta data será computado.
Русский: Выборы стюардов — 2011 завершены. Дальнейшие голоса не будут приняты.
Svenska: 2011 års val av stewarder är avslutat. Ingen ytterligare röstning kommer att accepteras.
中文: 2011年监管员选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废 [update needed: en]
中文(简体): 2011年监管員选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废 [update needed: en]
中文(繁體): 2011年監管員選舉已經結束。逾期投票將會作廢 [update needed: en]
Tiếng Việt: Cuộc bầu cử tiếp viên năm 2011 đã kết thúc. Không có phiếu bầu nào tiếp tục được chấp nhận.
Ελληνικά: Οι εκλογές επιτρόπων για το 2011 έχουν τελειώσει. Δεν γίνονται δεκτές άλλες ψήφοι. [update needed: en]
Türkçe: 2011 kâhya seçimleri tamamlanmıştır. Daha fazla oy kabul edilmeyecektir.
Azərbaycanca: 2011 stüard seçkiləri tamamlanmışdır. Daha səslər qəbul olunmur.

wpedzich (Wojciech Pędzich)[edit]

wpedzich talk · contribs · SULutil (accounts) / stalktoy · globalcontribs · crosswiki-ness · confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: pl (native), en-4 (near-native), de-2 (intermediate)
  • Personal info: I have previously held the position of a Wikimedia steward between late 2007 and 2009; due to a number of external and internal circumstances I decided to withdraw from a number of positions (such as adminship, bureaucratship and stewardship) in 2009 and from the Wikimedia life altogether for a short period in 2010. I still believe I have something to offer to the community though, even if I was not the most active steward at the time when high steward activity and availability was a top priority. I was criticised for one of the decisions I've taken as a steward, but the final conclusion was that the mistake was not fatal (fortunately) and all in all, despite moderate activity, my service as a steward was accepted by the community members - the lesson from that mistake was also well-learnt, or so I believe. I have to be plain about the fact that if elected, I still will probably not be in the top 5 of the active steward body, but I declare to support the stewards with what help I can offer.
bosanski:
  • Jezici: pl (native), en-4 (near-native), de-2 (intermediate)
  • Lične informacije: Ja sam već bio stjuard od 2007. do 2009; ali zbog nekoliko internih i eksternih razloga sam 2009. odlučio da ostavim neka prava (kao što su administrator, birokrata i stjuard), te sam se 2010. za kratko vrijeme potpuno udaljio od Wikimedia života. I dalje mislim da zajednici mogu puno ponuditi, iako nisam bio jedan od najaktivnijih stjuarda u vrijeme kad su bili potrebni. Bio sam kritiziran za jednu akciju kao stjuard, ali se ispostavilo da ta greška nije bila fatalna (na sreću) i sve u svemu, pored manje aktivnosti, moj rad je prihvaćen od zajednice - a iz greške sam naučio, bar vjerujem. Moram naglasiti, da ako budem izabran, neću biti jedan od 5 najaktivnijih stjuarda, ali mogu obećati da ću im pomoći gdje god je moguće.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: pl (native), en-4 (near-native), de-2 (intermediate)
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich war bereits Wikimedia-Steward von 2007 bis 2009; aufgrund mehrerer externer und interner Umstände habe ich mich 2009 dazu entschlossen, einige Positionen niederzulegen (wie zum Beispiel die als Administrator, Bürokrat und Steward), und habe mich 2010 für eine kurze Zeit gänzlich vom Wikimedialeben zurückgezogen. Ich glaube weiterhin, dass ich der Gemeinschaft dennoch einiges anbieten kann, auch wenn ich nicht der aktivste Steward in der Zeit war, als viele Stewardaktivitäten gefragt waren. Ich wurde für eine Aktion, die ich als Steward gemacht habe, kritisiert, aber das Fazit war, dass der Fehler (glücklicherweise) nicht fatal war, und alles in allem, abgesehen von der mäßigen Aktivität, wurde meine Aktivität als Steward von der Gemeinschaft akzeptiert – die Lektion aus dem Fehler habe ich gelernt, glaube ich zumindest. Ich muss deutlich sagen, dass ich, falls ich gewählt werde, wahrscheinlich nicht in den Top 5 der aktivsten Stewards sein werde, aber ich verspreche, den Stewards mit allem, was ich bieten kann, zu helfen.
español:
  • Idiomas: pl (native), en-4 (near-native), de-2 (intermediate)
  • Información personal: Fui con anterioridad steward desde finales de 2007 hasta 2009. Debido a un número de circunstancias tanto internas como externas decidí renunciar a un número de permisos (como administrador, burócrata y steward) en 2009 y de la vida en Wikimedia por un breve periodo en 2010. Creo, no obstante, que todavía tengo y puedo ofrecer algo a la comunidad aunque de aquella no fuese el steward más activo de todos cuando la alta actividad era la prioridad. Fui criticado una vez por una acción que realicé, pero tras su exposición la comunidad creyó que dicha acción no fue un error fatal y después de todo, a pesar de mi actividad moderada, la comunidad aceptó mis servicios como steward - la lección quedó pues bien aprendida. He de ser franco y decir que si soy elegido probablemente no esté entre los 5 stewards más activos, pero declaro que apoyaré a los stewards con todo lo que pueda ofrecer.
suomi:
  • Kielet: pl (native), en-4 (near-native), de-2 (intermediate)
  • Henkilökohtaiset tiedot: Olen aikaisemmin ollut Wikimedian ylivalvojana vuoden 2007 lopulta vuoteen 2009; sisäisten ja ulkoisten olosuhteiden vuoksi päätin vetäytyä monesta tehtävästä (kuten ylläpitäjyydestä, byrokraattiudesta ja ylivalvojuudesta) vuonna 2009 ja lyhyeksi ajaksi vuonna 2010 kokonaan Wikimedia-elämästä. Uskon silti yhä, että minulla on jotain tarjottavaa yhteisölle, vaikka en ollutkaan aktiivisimpia ylivalvojia aikana jolloin ylivalvojien aktiivisuus ja tavoitettavuus oli korkealla prioriteetilla. Minua kritisoitiin yhdestä ylivalvojana tekemästäni päätöksestä, mutta lopputulos oli ettei tekemäni virhe ollut (onneksi) mitenkään kohtalokas ja loppujen lopuksi yhteisön jäsenet hyväksyivät ylivalvojuuteni keskinkertaisesta aktiivisuudesta huolimatta. Uskon myös oppineeni virheestäni. Totuuden nimissä on sanottava että jos minut valitaan, tulen tuskin olemaan ylivalvojien top 5:ssä aktiivisuuden osalta, mutta lupaan tukea ylivalvojia pystyessäni kaikin tavoin.
français:
  • Langues : pl (native), en-4 (near-native), de-2 (intermediate)
  • Renseignements personnels : J'ai déjà occupé le poste de steward Wikimedia entre fin 2007 et 2009; en raison d'un certain nombre de circonstances externes et internes, j'ai décidé de me retirer d'un certain nombre de positions (comme admin, bureaucrate et steward) en 2009 et de la vie Wikipédia pour une courte période en 2010. Je pense toujours avoir quelque chose à offrir à la communauté , même si je n'étais pas le steward le plus actif au moment où une forte activité et une grande disponibilité étaient requises pour être steward. J'ai été critiqué pour l'une des décisions que j'ai prises en tant que steward, mais la conclusion finale est que l'erreur n'était pas fatale (heureusement) et dans l'ensemble, malgré une activité modérée, mon service en tant que steward a été accepté par les membres de la communauté - j'ai retenu la leçon de cette erreur , ou du moins, je le crois. Je me dois d'être clair sur le fait que si j'étais élu, je ne serais probablement pas dans le top 5 des stewards les plus actifs, mais je déclare soutenir les stewards et leur apporter toute l'aide que je peux offrir.
עברית:
  • שפות: pl (native), en-4 (near-native), de-2 (intermediate)
  • מידע אישי: דיבור כאן
Bahasa Indonesia:
  • Bahasa yang dikuasai: pl (native), en-4 (near-native), de-2 (intermediate)
  • Informasi pribadi: tuliskan pernyataan Anda di sini
italiano:
  • Lingue: pl (native), en-4 (near-native), de-2 (intermediate)
  • Informazioni personali: Ho già ricoperto precedentemente la posizione di steward tra fine 2007 e 2009; a causa di diverse circostanze interne ed esterne nel 2009 avevo deciso di ritirarmi da molte posizioni (come sysop, burocrate e steward), e dalla vita Wikimedia in genere per un breve periodo nel 2010. Credo comunque fermamente di avere ancora qualcosa da offrire alla comunità, anche se non sono stato il più attivo degli steward nel momento in cui una intensa attività di steward e la disponibilità erano importanti priorità. Sono stato criticato per una decisione presa in qualità di steward, ma la conclusione finale fu che l'errore non è stato (fortunatamente) fatale e a conti fatti nonostante la modesta attività, il mio servizio è stato riconosciuto dalla comunità degli utenti — la lezione a partire da quell'errore è stata ben appresa, o almeno così credo —. Devo essere esplicito sul fatto che, se eletto, non sarò probabilmente tra i primi cinque steward più attivi, ma dichiaro di sostenere gli steward con tutto l'aiuto che posso offrire.
日本語:
  • 言語: pl (native), en-4 (near-native), de-2 (intermediate)
  • 候補者の情報: 所信はこちら
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: pl (native), en-4 (near-native), de-2 (intermediate)
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Ik ben van eind 2007 tot 2009 eerder steward geweest. Als gevolg van een aantal externe en interne omstandigheden besloot ik eind 2009 een aantal taken neer te leggen (zoals moderator-, burocraat en stewardschap) voor een korte periode in 2010. Desondanks geloof ik dat ik de gemeenschap iets kan bieden, ook al was ik toentertijd niet de meest actieve steward, toen een hoge mate van activiteit en beschikbaarheid van stewards hoge prioriteit hadden. Ik werd bekritiseerd voor een van de beslissingen die ik als steward had genomen, maar uiteindelijk werd vastgesteld dat de vergissing (gelukkig) niet fataal was en al met al werden, ondanks matig actief zijn, mijn diensten als steward door de gemeenschap geaccepteerd - de les van die vergissing heb ik goed in mijn oren geknoopt, denk ik. Ik moet eerlijk zijn over het feit dat ik ook als ik gekozen word vermoedelijk niet deel zal gaan uitmaken van de top vijf van meest actieve stewards, maar ik ben bereid de andere stewards in alles wat ik kan te assisteren.
polski:
  • Języki: pl (native), en-4 (near-native), de-2 (intermediate)
  • Informacje osobiste: Piastowałem już funkcję stewarda Fundacji Wikimedia od końca 2007 do 2009; z uwagi na szereg czynników wewnętrznych i zewnętrznych zrezygnowałem z wielu funkcji (administratora, biurokraty, stewarda) w roku 2009, a z życia Wikimediów wyłączyłem się na jakiś czas zupełnie w roku 2010. Nadal jednak uważam, że mam coś do zaoferowania społeczności, nawet jeśli nie byłem najaktywniejszym ze stewardów w czasie, gdy aktywność i dostępność tych członków społeczności była wysokim priorytetem. Byłem skrytykowany za jedną z podjętych w trakcie stewardowania decyzji, lecz ostateczny wniosek ze sprawy był taki, że na szczęście decyzja nie była fatalna w skutkach, a moja praca została przez członków społeczności Wikimedia zaaprobowana. Na pewno podniesiona w potwierdzeniu mojej funkcji kwestia była dla mnie ważną lekcją. Muszę jasno powiedzieć, że o ile zostanę wybrany na funkcje stewarda, nadal zapewne nie będzie mnie można zobaczyć w czołowej piątce aktywności, lecz deklaruje wspieranie funkcji stewardzkich tak, jak mogę.
português:
  • Línguas: pl (native), en-4 (near-native), de-2 (intermediate)
  • Informações pessoais: Já tive anteriormente o cargo de steward entre o final de 2007 e 2009; Devido a uma série de circunstâncias, tanto externas quanto internas, decidi renunciar a uma série de posições (entre elas a de burocrata, administrador e steward) em 2009, e da vida wikimediana totalmente por um curto período em 2010. Eu ainda acredito que tenho algo a oferecer à comunidade, apesar de não ter sido o steward mais activo numa altura em que a actividade disponibilidade eram uma das maiores prioridades. Eu fui criticado por uma das decisões que tomei como steward, mas a conclusão final foi que o erro não era fatal (felizmente) e ao fim, apesar da actividade moderada, o meu serviço como steward foi aceite pelos membros da comunidade - a lição decorrente deste erro também foi bem aprendida, ou assim eu acredito. Tenho que ser claro sobre o facto de que, se eleito, ainda não serei provavelmente um dos 5 stewards mais activos, mas desejo apoiar os stewards com toda a ajuda que possa oferecer.
русский:
  • Языки: pl (native), en-4 (near-native), de-2 (intermediate)
  • Личная информация: С конца 2007 по 2009 год я уже был стюардом; из-за некоторых внешних и внутренних причин я решил отказаться от ряда флагов (таких, как администратор, бюрократ и стюард) в 2009 и от вики-жизни на короткий период 2010 года. Я все еще верю, что могу что-то дать сообществу, хотя я и не был самым активным стюадом в то время, когда были крайне важны активность и доступность стюардов. Меня раскритиковали за одно из моих решений на позиции стюарда, но в конечном счете ошибка не была признана фатальной (к счастью), а сама моя работа в качестве стюарда в целом, несмотря на среднюю активность, была принята сообществом - урок той ошибки был мною хорошо усвоен, по крайней мере я в это верю. Я должен сразу признаться, что в случае, если меня выберут, я все равно не буду входить в топ-5 самых активных стюардов, но я готов помогать стюардам всем, чем могу.
српски / srpski:
  • Језици: pl (native), en-4 (near-native), de-2 (intermediate)
  • Лични подаци: Ја сам већ био Викимедијин стјуард у периоду између 2007. и 2009. године, али због одређених екстерних и интерних околности одлучио сам да се одрекнем појединих овлашћења (као што су администраторска, бирократска и стјуардска овлашћења) током 2009. године, а 2010. сам се накратко био у потпуности повукао са Викимедије. Још увек верујем да имам шта да понудим, иако нисам био најактивнији стјуард у тренуцима када су висока активност и присуство стјуарда били најважнији приоритет. Критикован сам због једне од одлука које сам донео као стјуард, али је коначни закључак био да та грешка није била фатална (на срећу) и, све у свему, упркос мојој умереној активности, чланови заједнице су прихватили акције које сам начинио као стјуард, а и добро сам научио лекцију из те грешје или бар верујем да је тако. Морам нагласити да ако будем изабран, вероватно и даље нећу бити међу 5 најактивнијих стјуарда, али могу обећати да ћу помоћи стјуардима колико год могу.
Tiếng Việt:
  • Ngôn ngữ: pl (native), en-4 (near-native), de-2 (intermediate)
  • Thông tin cá nhân: Tôi đã từng giữ vai trò tiếp viên Wikimedia từ cuối năm 2007 đến 2009; do một số hoàn cảnh cá nhân và nội bộ, tôi quyết định rút khỏi một số chức vụ (như bảo quản viên, hành chính viên và tiếp viên) trong năm 2009 và hoàn toàn không tham gia cuộc sống Wikimedia trong một khoảng thời gian ngắn của năm 2010. Tôi vẫn tin rằng tôi có gì để đóng góp cho cộng đồng mặc dù tôi không phải là tiếp viên hoạt động tích cực nhất vào thời điểm mà sự hoạt động và sự có mặt của tiếp viên là ưu tiên hàng đầu. Tôi đã bị chỉ trích vì một trong các quyết định mà tôi đã thực hiện khi còn là tiếp viên, nhưng cuối cùng sai lầm đó không dẫn đến hậu quả nghiêm trọng (thật may) và dù xảy ra chuyện gì, dù hoạt động chỉ vừa phải, cung cách phục vụ như một tiếp viên của tôi vẫn được các thành viên của cộng đồng chấp nhận - bài học từ sai lầm đó cũng đã được rút kinh nghiệm, vì vậy mà tôi vẫn luôn tin như đã nói ở trên. Tôi vẫn phải giải thích trước là thực tế nếu được bầu lần này, tôi vẫn có thể sẽ không nằm trong tốp 5 tiếp viên tích cực nhất, nhưng tôi xuất hiện ở đây để hỗ trợ tiếp viên với những gì mà tôi có thể giúp.

Questions: See Stewards/elections 2011/Questions#wpedzich

Thank you for all those who decided to cast their votes; I hope that the people who voted against, especially in the light of my potential unstability as a steward and editor, will not bear a grudge. As much as I would like to, deeper explanation would lead to revealing some personal details which I would like to keep from becoming too public. I am, however, convinced that the issues which were cause of my withdrawal have been dealt with and as per my statement, I will try to be a reliable steward. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes[edit]

  1. Support Support i am the first supporter Mardetanha talk 00:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Juliancolton | Talk 00:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. LeinaD (t) 00:02, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Trusted and helpful user. PS I wanted to be first :([reply]
  4. JDavid 00:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5. μ 00:06, February 7 2011 (UTC)
  6. -- Dferg ☎ talk 00:06, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Support SpeedyGonsales 00:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --თოგო (D) 00:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  fetchcomms 00:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Maire 00:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Ineligible, since the user doesn't have enough edits. --FiliP ██ 00:39, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Jafeluv 00:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  11. -- Marcus Cyron 00:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  12. DerHexer (Talk) 00:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Welcome back! :-D[reply]
  13. - @lestaty discuţie 00:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  14. You served as an excellent steward. It would be good to have you back. SJ · talk | translate 00:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  15. You have experience, good luck with the old task ;) --minhhuy*= 01:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support מתניה 01:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Good enough for me. 1ForTheMoney 01:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Ineligible, since there is no link from meta to home wiki and/or vice versa. --FiliP ██ 00:39, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  17. FASTILY (TALK) 01:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  18. -- Maximillion Pegasus 02:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support Bennylin 03:36, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Mikołka (talk) 04:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 05:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Henri Pidoux 05:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support --Cekli829 05:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Support --Jacob 05:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Support--Torin 05:48, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support Support Saloca 06:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support Support--Wikiwind 06:48, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Support Marcin Łukasz Kiejzik 07:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  29. MoiraMoira 08:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Jan eissfeldt 08:11, 7 February 2011 (UTC) :o)[reply]
  31. Support Support Mjbmr Talk 08:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Support Support--Roberta F. 08:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Nemo 09:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Herby talk thyme 09:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  35. What I really appreciate in Wpedzich is his frankiness about his past and future involvment. And one thing should be taken as granted - it's gonna be like he says. Therefore I'm all for yes, because I know that he won't surprise me. Masur 09:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Kenraiz 10:06, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  37. SWATJester Son of the Defender 10:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Welcome again then. — Tanvir • 10:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Gytha 10:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Enzo^ 11:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support Support mickit 11:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Yarl 11:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  43. OlEnglish (Talk) 11:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Yes. Good work as a former (and future) steward. Elfix 12:23, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support Support Objectivesea 12:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Support Support Ruy Pugliesi 12:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Support Support --Tchoř 13:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support Support abf /talk to me/ 13:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Gregory of nyssa 13:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Certainly. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Sasan700 14:02, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support --Gnosos 15:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Not eligible.[reply]
  52. Support Support Arekowy 15:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Magalia 15:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Awersowy 15:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Support Support VR-Land 16:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --Flopy 17:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Terence 17:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  58. RafaAzevedo 17:24, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Mo Cuishle 17:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Ineligible, since the user doesn't have enough edits. --FiliP ██ 00:39, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support Support Hunaghe 18:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  60. -jkb- 18:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  61. oh yes!!!--Nick1915 - all you want 18:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Diego Grez return fire 18:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Bugoslav 18:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  64. --M/ 18:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support Support --WizardOfOz talk 19:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Support Support mc10 (t/c) 19:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Sebk. 19:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  68. ChristianH 20:06, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Did a good job, I hope to repeat it.[reply]
  69. Davecrosby uk 20:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  70. --MF-W 21:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Sure. Trijnstel 21:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  72. --Adamt 21:43, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  73. --Marmale 21:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Radmic 22:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Astromp 22:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Lolsimon 00:19, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Support Support Per Sj. ++Lar: t/c 00:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  78. zweiundachtzigster → «« Man77 »» [de]·[bar] 01:20, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Jack Merridew 03:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  80. --Shijualex 03:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  81. --Vhorvat 04:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Support Support -- බිඟුවා සාකච්ඡාව 04:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support --Jwuthe2 07:17, 8 February 2011 (UTC) Not eligible.[reply]
  83. Kenrick95 12:24, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Support Support Jon Harald Søby 14:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Carolmooredc 14:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Support Support Smat 14:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Bacus15 15:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Pablo000 16:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Without a doubt — NickK 16:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Elfhelm 18:26, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Support Support masti <dyskusja> 18:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  92. --Darwinius 18:39, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Support Support Patryk91 19:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Maikking 20:57, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Support Support Henryk Borawski 21:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Bawolff 21:17, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Viatoro 21:23, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Support Support Staszek99 21:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  99. За --Anatoliy (talk) 21:36, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Piotr mil 21:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Ineligible, since there is no link from meta to home wiki and/or vice versa. --FiliP ██ 00:39, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Support Support YES! J.delanoygabsadds 22:11, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Support Support - Romaine 23:56, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Support Support--Shizhao 00:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Support Support Junius 03:20, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Support Support MBisanz talk 07:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  105. --Nolispanmo 10:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support Support--Jusjih 10:10, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Support Support--Quodvultdeus 12:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  108. rubin16 13:43, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  109. iAlex 14:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support--Vissegerd-Adam 16:15, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Ineligible, since the user doesn't have enough edits. --FiliP ██ 00:39, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Support Support--Simon951434 17:32, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Support Support -- Neelix 17:33, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Support Support, welcome again! Alex Pereira falaê 17:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Support Support -- Wulfstan 18:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Support Support CasteloBrancomsg 20:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Support Support Kpjas 20:53, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Support Support --Vasyl` Babych 20:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Support Support Paterm 21:16, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Support Support --Neozoon 21:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Support Support --Versageek 22:54, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Support Support Glad to see you back! --Millosh 23:15, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Support SupportVítej zpět--Yopie 23:31, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Support Support -- Avi 03:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Support Support - While I've had no interactions, a review of this user's contributions makes me confident that there will be no misuse of the tools. Has my support and confidence. A personal action, not as a statement from the Foundation. --Philippe 05:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Support Support - Bombka190 21:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Potrzeba kolejnego polskiego stweardu[reply]
  125. Support Support --Lucas Nunes 12:07, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Support Support - Fransvannes 12:40, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  127. --Brownout(msg) 12:43, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support -- GO! GreatArchitect 13:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC)] Not eligible.[reply]
  128. Support Support. Very experienced and trustworthy user. ThiagoRuiz 16:38, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Support Support --A1 17:59, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  130. --Ticketautomat 19:34, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  131. --Ziko 19:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Support Support --Aristeas 20:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Christian Giersing 21:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  134. --Holder 08:55, 11 February 2011 (UTC) of course[reply]
  135. Support Support --Bhawani 09:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Marauder09 Long live the thrash Marauder09 17:52, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Ludmiła Pilecka 21:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Peter Ellis 23:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Support Support Looks good to me; per Philippe, but checked for myself; no concerns at this time. Chzz 00:03, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Support Support --Gamma127 00:55, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Support Support I find it refreshing that somebody acknowledges limitations. Ingolfson 11:02, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Support Support---Beko 20:26, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Support Support Gerhard51 21:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Support Support --Brandon5485 22:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Makawity 23:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC) Not eligible.[reply]
  145. Support Support --Zeljko 03:00, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Support Support - Tiptoety talk 03:32, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Support Support Vote originally cast by Banaticus. odder (talk) 17:06, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Support Support (no doubt) Abronikowski 11:17, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  149. --FollowTheMedia 12:49, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Support Support odder (talk) 17:06, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Support SupportI've known the candidate for many years, he is extremely trustworthy and competent Pundit 17:44, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Szoltys 20:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Ineligible, since there is no link from meta to home wiki and/or vice versa. --FiliP ██ 00:39, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Support Support of course  – mike@meta:~$  22:25, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  153. --Vituzzu 23:36, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Support Support Steven Walling (talk) 00:34, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Support Support No brainer. Happy to see you back. --Aphaia 11:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Foxie001 17:59, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Support Support Has got the experience and everyone makes mistakes. Good job, --Floflo 22:57, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Support Support Seems like he will be a good steward. Lucimundatene89 01:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Support Support Caiaffa 11:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Support Support Good to see you back. --Mercy 13:56, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Okino 14:29, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Njaelkies Lea 18:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Support Support Bearian 23:13, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Support Support - Spoladore 16:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Rw23 21:34, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Support Support --Bullenwächter 14:23, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Support Support Ankry 16:14, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Support. AGK 20:25, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Support Support Geoff Who, me? 20:48, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Support Support Niech będzie, -- Zara-arush (talk) 04:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Support Support - previous experience matters. He will do just as good in 2011. --Visik 04:59, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Support Support looks fine to me WormTT 10:33, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Support Support Smat 12:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Support Support --Lonio17 13:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Happa Happa111 14:24, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Ineligible, since the user doesn't have enough edits. --FiliP ██ 00:39, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Support Support excellent candidate --NSH001 15:20, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Support Support Kleuske 19:19, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Support Support Michał Sobkowski 19:20, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  178. Support Support Patrol110 21:16, 18 February 2011 (UTC) A trustworthy man.[reply]
  179. Support Support Udufruduhu 21:22, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Support Support Sp5uhe 22:08, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Support Support --Emaus 02:38, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  182. --Sergey Semenovtalk 03:08, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Support Support --Slon02 06:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Support Support --Soenke Rahn 11:07, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Bukaj 12:09, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Andrzej19 14:12, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 2 reasons: He got enough expierence and He's a very communicative person.[reply]
  187. Support Support --Poco a poco 17:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Elvaube 19:20, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Support Support Cbrown1023 talk 00:10, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Support Support --Kiran Gopi 05:19, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Support SupportYourEyesOnly 05:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  192. hope you won't give up now :) Stefaniak 12:49, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Support Support Comte0 14:29, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Ori.livneh 17:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC) Not eligible[reply]
  194. Support Support Zyephyrus 19:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Support Support Cojan 14:10, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  196. Support Support --Croq 21:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Support Support Rubicon 02:54, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  198. Support Support Welcome back! Béria Lima msg 17:24, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Support SupportEvo101469 17:44, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  200. Blanket Support Support for all candidates as opposition to the blanket opposition by User:Riffic, in support of open balloting. --Yair rand 21:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Support Supportstr4nd 23:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  202. Support Support Dasz radę, Wojtek! —Kubek15T C 13:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Kelvin 16:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC) Not eligible[reply]
  203. 32X 18:42, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Polimerek 22:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  205. Support Support Andreas Werle 17:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  206. vvvt 21:49, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  207. Support Support Karol007 22:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No[edit]

  1. Vigilium 22:36, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose Oppose Does not seem to have enough x-wiki experience. Not sure what he can or willing to do with the privileges of Stewards.--Tomo suzuki 17:23, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Blanket 'NO' votes for all candidates as a form of protest against open balloting. riffic 18:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose Sympatico 15:30, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Sympatico ineligible to vote. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:39, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose Oppose This user seems to have good communication skills and enough experience. I have no problem with anyone resigning from posts, but anyone who resigns from elected positions one year and leaves Wikipedia the next ought not to ask for re-election the year after. Either show some stability by being a good user continually for a bit longer or bear your soul and explain in detail how you can have an abnormally chaotic recent history and yet now are ready to commit to an extremely complicated post for a year. Congratulations on the child. Have fun and do not get stressed out over anything. Blue Rasberry (talk) 03:37, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose Oppose. As Bluerasberry said, this user seems to have good communication skills and enough experience. However, I share Bluerasberry's doubts as well. –Tommy Kronkvist, 21:29, 27 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Neutral[edit]

  1. Eddylandzaat 01:46, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Ralf.treinen 22:58, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral Neutral. Not really convincing. VonTasha 11:24, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]