Jump to content

Steward requests/Miscellaneous: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Zyuzong (talk | contribs)
66 edits
m edit in wrong place
Line 182: Line 182:
#[[:SS:跨服战|跨服战]]
#[[:SS:跨服战|跨服战]]
I request to deleteing them--[[User:Zyuzong|Zyuzong]] ([[User talk:Zyuzong|talk]]) 15:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
I request to deleteing them--[[User:Zyuzong|Zyuzong]] ([[User talk:Zyuzong|talk]]) 15:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
:{{Done}} Thanks for reporting them. [[User:PiRSquared17|PiRSquared17]] ([[User talk:PiRSquared17|talk]]) 15:05, 22 April 2013 (UTC)


==== Request for nycwikimedia====
==== Request for nycwikimedia====

Revision as of 15:05, 22 April 2013

Shortcut:
SRM
This page is to request actions on a wiki without active administrators, to be performed by stewards or global sysops. Other than obvious speedy deletions, all requests should obtain consensus from the wiki community before being requested here and a link should be provided to that consensus. Such requests include deletions, big deletions, edit on protected pages, renaming of protected pages, etc.

To add a listing in a language that isn't already here, create a new section header:

==== Requests for [[xx:]] ====

To report vandalism issues, see vandalism reports.

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests


Bot-reported speedy deletion requests

This section is for reports filed via Kimberley-nia Bot on the SWMT's IRC channel #cvn-sw (bot's irc nick is Dellieplagiat). They are submitted on this subpage. Please watch this page separately if you are a steward, a global sysop, or a local administrator.

It is possible to manually edit this list if you follow the bot's formatting. If you feel a request is inappropriate, please remove the lines containing that request entirely. (Leaving comments, modifying the header line, and striking out reports will confuse the bot.)

Example for the correct formatting: 

* {{msd-link|ie.wikipedia|Talk:Europa}}
*: spam - IRC user DerHexer ~~~~~

Properly-filed requests that point to pages that have already been deleted or do not exist will be automatically removed by the bot. Note: It is unnecessary to remove requests for wikis where local admins "can handle it by themselves". If that is really so, the pages will surely be deleted within a small period of time and then be automatically removed from the list by the bot.

Manual requests

Please see tools:~erwin85/delete.php for a list of pages tagged with {{Delete}} and/or the local equivalent.

Quick links: 0 sysops – 3 sysops / 1 month ago – 5 sysops / 3 months ago

Requests for a single wiki

25 files without (right) licence on avwiki, 10 on lbewiki and 30 on ltgwiki

Status:    In progress

25 files are in av:Категория:Candidates for speedy deletion since 17 May 2012, all of them because of “dubious/wrong/no license” but the wiki has 0 sysops. --Geitost diskusjon 12:19, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I put a notice on the talk page of User:Seb az86556 who set the templates (sysop on nvwiki). --Geitost diskusjon 12:38, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

10 files are in lbe:Категория:Speedy deletion requests since 17 May, same as above, also 0 sysops. --Geitost diskusjon 13:31, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And 29 files are in ltg:Kategoreja:Candidates for speedy deletion since 17 May, same as above, also 0 sysops. In addition one file there has been tagged with the delete template because of spam on 26 May, the link goes to a not existing user and there’s no permission. Can IP users upload files on small wikis? --Geitost diskusjon 13:31, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes, this has gone unanswered for a while. I'll start going through them - unfortunately, nobody removed the links to those files, so I'll need to stop being lazy and do it myself. IPs cannot upload files, so not sure what caused that. Ajraddatz (Talk) 12:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
These suspected copyvios are still sitting here... This, that and the other (talk) 02:19, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I had a quick look at those images at avWP, and most look to be fair use, just insufficiently tagged. I would think that initially it would be more useful to contact the community and to assist them to get their images compliant, and to lift the quality of their copyright tagging. Seems a more efficient use of effort. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:34, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Progress report? -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:26, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lost history

Status:    In progress

Hi.

The page //fr.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=d%C3%A9sembl%C3%A9matiser&action=history seems to have been created 15 mars 2010 à 22:04‎ Lmaltier

But it was created before : //fr.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Sp%C3%A9cial:Journal&page=d%C3%A9sembl%C3%A9matiser

But where are the previous versions ? I can't find them.

Thanks for your help. --ArséniureDeGallium (talk) 04:07, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you start to delete the file, then you will see that there are deleted components, the whole history was not retrieved. There are a number of pages around that discuss this matter, some explanation at b:en:MediaWiki Administrator's Handbook/Edit History — billinghurst sDrewth 07:34, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. I tried that. But it didn't work : oldest version is still missing. The log says a version has been deleted on 15 mars 2010 à 20:19, but this version doesn't exist when you try to resrore it. --ArséniureDeGallium (talk) 22:07, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I see what you after and I think that you may have missed components in the log. If you look at the deletion log for désemblématiser you will see that the page was recovered and moved to fr:wikt:désemblématisé 21:43, 15 March 2010 Chrisaix (Talk | contribs | block) moved page désemblématiser to désemblématisé without leaving a redirect (c'est un adjectif, pas un verbe) and the history that you are looking for is there. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:11, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Progress report? -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:26, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

arz.wikipedia.org Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia

Status:    Not done

Welcome.One users in Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia

  1. Creates pages of sabotage in the scope of Wikipedia and scope of Wikipedia Talk
  2. Creates pages of sabotage in the scope of
    1. Talk
    2. File talk
  3. Protects pages without any reason

Please Prevent him and drag him, the validity of the administrative --41.130.42.120 06:25, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This project has three active sysops (including Raafat, btw) : did you try to contact them to bring the issue ? Cordially, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 06:42, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bxr-wiki

Status:    In progress

I’d like you to draw your attention to Mikhail Gubin in bxr-wiki. In particular, he blocked me for deleting a spam-link from the Main Page and for deleting anonymous vandal edits from my discussion page (that have been most likely made by Mikhail Gubin himself — the Check Users could check it).

To my mind Mihkail Gubin should be demoted, notably because he declared his retirement in favour of the project that he defended by my blocking. Also, I have not been notified about the blocking. Saint Johann (ru) 18:00, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Comment Refers to [1], bxr:Special:Contributions/Saint Johann. πr2 (t • c) 18:08, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Saint Johann was banned for triple pullback of replica on his talk page. The link led to a site Wikisphere, with the text "New articles are here". The user was not going to discuss, and simply rolls cues and changes with an explanation "rw".--Gubin (talk) 19:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
His explanation "rvv" (not "rw"; two "v"s) typically stands for "revert vandalism". I wonder whether this can be settled without steward intervention. πr2 (t • c) 19:43, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
yea of course! I will apologize for the block.--Gubin (talk) 20:03, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
done. I removed the link to the site. The consensus was found. Thanks. Have a nice day!--Gubin (talk) 20:05, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A thing is remained unexplained though. Why did Saint Johann revert an admin's action using rvv as object? As far as I recollect, Saint Johann was blocked on nv.wikipedia as well, even though, after all, it seemed that block was wrong, Saint Johann had just reverted a vandalism, therefore you can state the user knows what he does. I was wondering if Gubin's version was somehow related to a sort of spam/vandalism.--Frigotoni ...i'm here; 20:20, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Johann decided that the reference to the alternative project is spam. Perheps he is right. But he was not banned for that, but and for rolling back the replicas on his talk page.--Gubin (talk) 20:26, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps because what that IP had written was wrong or inappropriate. Such blocks anyway are excessive from my point of view. Saint Johann didn't in any way vandalize, and you had to warn him (at least, if that IP didn't belong to you). --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 20:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted his edits as vandalism because those links were nothing more than promotion of his own site on the bxr-wiki’s main page. There was no consensus from my side because this is not his first arguable admin action: for example, he has deleted the bureaucrat election page along with all the talk, and later restored it, but without the changes, and his friends added him 7 votes "pro", inspite of the critics in deleted versions. And my block has not been hidden. The messages on my talk page are some kind of obscenity, according to what I’ve learned from discussions with Mikhail. He wrote me in Skype the same words when tried to insult me.
Also I'd like to add that Mikhail wrote an article about himself in bxr-wiki, where he called himself a 12 years old intellectual, explorer, Crimean chagan's descendant and a Crimean throne pretender. Moreover, he added such Internet merits as "Cyclowiki.org's watcher and Buryaad Wiki founder", and a self-written book called "Anaon — the last wolf of Prague". Saint Johann (ru) 21:06, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I absolutely agree with Saint Johann. Besides the fact that he wrote an article about himself, he did a lot of actions which do not correspond with the actions of the administrator. After the elections, he start doing "null-articles", for example, this is "article" about Norway: Norway - European country. That's all! And, by the way, the Category added by me, first interwiki - by user ArshavaDm, so you can see that he making "articles" like that. It is absolutely impermissible, especially when it's done by the Project administrator.

Secondly, he starting to create articles... about Wikipedians! bxr:Hoo Man, bxr:Saint Johann, bxr:Bogomolov.PL, about himself and even about me (I requested to deleting it). Thirdly, he crushed Sidebar section - absolutely in all languages you can see Buryat words in Navigation section. We told about it to user Gubin, but he doing nothing with this misstake that he done himself. Fourth, user had a claims about non-free images. This problem (among the others) was in Russian Wikipedia too, where Губин Михаил has been blocked indefinitely. And, as you understand, he just feels the freedom in the project where he became an administrator and start to uploading the files without correct justification. He even tried to upload the million articles (about numbers) with help of one of bot-owner from Russian Wikipedia, but, of cource, this user has rejected this request (sorry, I can't find the link, but this situation really was, I can add the link later). Many Губин's problems described in this message from user Kaganer. Gubin have big problems with the undestanding of Wikipedia and Wikimedia principles, he doing many mystifications.

About the Bureaucrat elections - it was really terrible. You can observe Requests for adminship page in BXR-Wikipedia to understand what was happening at the time. He closed voting in 3-4 days after the starting when all his friends-mitpuppets (ArshavaDm, WikiUserFS) allready woted. He put forward for election inactive users such as Jargal from whom admin's flag was removed thanks for his inactivity. Look @ this request - what kind of administrator wanted Gubin for Buryat Wikipedia? Admin who even can't create the request himself!? I think, Russavia even don't knew about this request. And, of course, all those fictions was about his own bureaucrat elections, page that he deleted, but stewards can see deleted pages - you can observe it.

I request to block user Губин Михаил in all Wikimedia projects. He discredited himself, he did not justify the hopes of those who elected him as Administrator of the Buryat Wikipedia, he continually breaks the rules of the Wikimedia Foundation.--Soul Train (talk) 07:22, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Interesting, this is 3rd situation right on this page where discussed the actions of Губин Михаил. It's time to take the actions! Right now.--Soul Train (talk) 07:40, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • If someone wants my opinion, Губин Михаил is an immature contributor turned a cross-wiki vandal. He recently tried to squat the Kalmyk Wikipedia, and he was somehow unlucky that I check all edits on that project every day and that I am also a Meta regular. Before that, he managed to squat the Buryat Wikipedia, and this is unfortunate. We do not even know whether the stuff he contributes there is written in Buryat (he sometimes claims bxr-1, which is probably an exaggeration, and sometimes he claims this is his mother tongue). Saint Johann is another immature contributor who considers Wikimedia projects to be a kind of social medium and has very little interest in contributing meaningful content. If both of them get globally locked, we are not going to lose anything. On the other hand, I understand that we first need to follow the formal procedures, and second even if we do nothing is going to happen. To get desysopped on a small wiki one needs to do smth really serious, like the last time it happened the sysop went wild and started reverting stewards' edits. (Just blocking contributors in good standing without prior notice does not suffice, as we know). So the easiest is just to close this topic in order to reduce drama.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Ymblanter, I strongly believe that age discrimination must not be tolerated in any way. There is no need to mention that one of the users is immature or Asian, or male — whatever. It also is absolutely inappropriate to reveal that someone is immature, according to Child Protection guidances. Please do not do it again. Kf8 (talk) 09:10, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    "he sometimes claims bxr-1, which is probably an exaggeration, and sometimes he claims this is his mother tongue" oh, how stupid you are! Yes, I speak Mongolian (or Buryat) fluently, because I was born in Ulaanbaatar, but I have problems with writing and grammer, so I wrote I am "bxr-1". Really it is BXR-3 or more.--Gubin (talk) 13:51, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    I have no idea what his age is. By calling someone immature I mean that he consistently demonstrates immature behavior, not that he is legally minor (which might be the case or might not be the case).--Ymblanter (talk) 12:37, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    (Вы же понимаете русский, не так ли, а переводить это на английский у меня нет желания) Относительно моей характеристики - то, что я не всегда занимаюсь только Википедией, не означает, что "я имею очень маленький интерес во внесении контента и считаю проекты Викимедиа социальной средой". Впрочем, насчёт последнего не без доли правды, ибо проекты Викимедиа таковой давно стали. Делать же такие характеристики только на основе каких-то личных догадок является тем же самым, если бы я сейчас сказал, что вы, несмотря на прекращение деятельности в русской Википедии, продолжаете атаковать участника, с которым у вас был личный конфликт в ней. Saint Johann (ru) 09:15, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    У меня не было никакого конфликта с Губиным в русской Википедии, и я подозреваю, что он там появился сильно позже, чем я оттуда ушёл.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:39, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Я отнюдь не про Губина и не про себя. Saint Johann (ru) 14:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Тогда, честно говоря, я не очень вижу, как Вас это касается.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:11, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Ярослав, Saint Johann иногда бывает невыносим, таких сложных людей в Википедии хватает, но сравнивать его с откровенным вандалом и провокатором Губиным - это слишком. Saint Johann очень много делает работы в том числе в малых языковых разделах; в частности, он был временным администратором Лезгинской Википедии и очень помог с техническими вопросами, также он работал в Татарском Викисловаре, причём в самой что ни на есть содержательной части. А вот Губина Михаила заблокировать следует. К счастью, его флаг всё равно будет снят в начале марта.--Soul Train (talk) 09:59, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Ну и отлично. На блокировке Saint Johann я не настаиваю, но сколько я с ним пересекался, пользы не видел, а флуда много.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:41, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Мне плевать на то, что вы говорите. И на ФВ мне плевать. вы сами отпертые вандалы (кроме Йоханна). задолбали. идите вы все далеко и надолго. я даже читать это простыню не буду. Мы открыли новую ВП. Без долбоклюя ЯБлантера. Судя по поведению, единственный нормальный тут - Йоханн. Удачной!--Gubin (talk) 13:12, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    А, то есть 2,5 раза максимум? Ну OK, если вы на основе этого делаете предположения о мотивах и т. д., то что вам тут скажешь. Saint Johann (ru) 14:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    PS. "На блокировке Saint Johann я не настаиваю, но сколько я с ним пересекался, пользы не видел, а флуда много." - от Блантера я тоже пользы не видел. Вообще.--Gubin (talk) 14:52, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Губин Михаил 13:12, 26 February 2013 (UTC) wrote: I don't care about what you say. And I do not care about (Wikimedia Foundation). All you are inveterate vandals (except Johann). You are bugging me! *uck you all far and long. I even will not read all this sheet. We have opened a new Wikipedia. Without (personal abuse) YaBlanter*. It seems that there is only one normal (user) here - Johann. Good luck -. * - this incorrect form (YaBlanter) is very close to abuse itself in Russian language.--Soul Train (talk) 07:06, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • As you can see, Губин wrote himself that he (they?) opened "his own Wikipedia". It is not abuse itself, bot you saw the link on the Main page, you saw invitations that he leaves on talk pages of few active users of the Buryat Wikipedia. I repeat - Губин Михаил can't be administrator of Wikimedia Foundaton's progect, he is dangerous and must be desysoped right now, today. I request it as a member of Small Wiki Monitoring Team and Russian citizen who is not indifferent to small Wikipedias on the languages of Russian Federation.--Soul Train (talk) 07:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
О да, я боюсь )))) --Gubin (talk) 14:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The request can be archived, the user lost the admin flag and is unlikely to ever get it back.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:57, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for ce.wikipedia

Status:    Done

I request to deleting files and pages in this category for the speedy deletion.--Soul Train (talk) 10:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All Done, except for ce:Мариуполь (this looks like a legitimate article to me) and ce:Куцкеп:ПозКарта (which was marked for deletion via the doc page; I deleted the doc page as requested, but am not sure if the template itself should also be deleted). Jon Harald Søby (talk) 10:16, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, Mariupol is a good stub--Soul Train (talk) 08:04, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for ug.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Couldn't find requests from admins page. There's a need to block 2 users and to delete 2 pages : ug:ئالاھىدە:Contributions/ילד_קטן and ug:ئالاھىدە:Contributions/יוסף_חיים_דוד (tracking their global activity shows it the same user...). All of the edits were vandalism. The pages are: ug:אחמדדינאגד and ug:ישראל (written in Hebrew. Vandalism as well). Neukoln (talk) 14:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done, pages deleted. But about IPs, not necessary for now. The IPs have not been editing for a few days now. If vandalism's back, please report in Vandalism reports. Regards. Érico Wouters msg 14:41, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Very well, though I don't follow that wiki... I checked their edits in order to assess checkuser request at the he.wiki. I've already blocked some of his sockpuppets without checking, based on editing pattern and a mistake he has done (signing his name while using another account). thanks, Neukoln (talk) 15:49, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for ru.wikipedia

Status:    Done

I request to delete page wikipedia:ru:Список российских фамилий according this RfD. Page have a history more than 5000 editions. Дядя Фред (talk) 13:53, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unless the tool is wrong, this page has only 3522 revisions and can be deleted by a normal admin QuiteUnusual TalkQu 15:57, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I do confirm that this page should be deleted. Also, I confirm that only steward could delete this page due it has more than 500 revisions (as engine reports on attempt to delete it), Bezik (talk) 16:49, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done [when deleting, the software said there are >7000 revisions; now when looking at the restore mode it also says there are 3522 revisions] --MF-W 16:52, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
One of those "quirks" of very old pages, probably QuiteUnusual TalkQu 17:12, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

History merging in es.wikipedia

Status:    Done

I need a steward for a merge two articles with histories of more than 5000 editions. They have to merge es:Comunicación en red in es:Red de computadoras. The text already are the same. Thanks --Ignacio (talk) 20:32, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Quentinv57 (talk) 21:02, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chechen Wikipedia

Status:    In progress

Please, delete all pages, files and categories from this category. Thanks, Saint Johann (ru) 20:51, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are actually 3 sysops active now. You might ask them to delete those pages. --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 21:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This pages added by one of sysops, Sasan700. And I'm not sure that this sysops really delete this pages, see another request. Saint Johann (ru) 21:06, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Could you read this thread, please?--Soul Train (talk) 21:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I was privy to it. In my opinion, first, the problem should rotate around the sysop at issue in order to understand such actions, and, once solved the matter, those pages could be deleted. Regardless, it's preferable a steward to perform this operation, and Quentinv57 and others, are already working on it. --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 21:22, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sasan700 reverted all templates without reason. If you want to delete, see this category (all at letter "С"). Saint Johann (ru) 07:27, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for mwl.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

Please delete mwl:Trasporte de traçon animal. Senseless content. Garsd (talk) 09:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks QuiteUnusual TalkQu 09:33, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to ask once more if someone could take a look at mwl:Biquipédia:Pedidos als admenistradores where there is a heap of deleting work to do. mwl.wikipedia has 2 administrators: mwl:User:Manuel de Sousa (who some time ago did something in that page, but he mostly is absent) and mwl:User:Alchimista (who decidedly does not take care of any requests for administrator attention). All requests in portuguese (a few in mirandese). Thank you in advance. Garsd (talk) 19:05, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did 1... Why don't you run for adminship there? πr2 (t • c) 19:13, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's no chance of me becoming an administrator there. The community is reduced to me (working there everyday) and 2 others (seldom seen there but always ready to say no) who think I'm dangerous. One of them in one occasion even said he is scared. The other confessed in another occasion they both have some plan regarding mwl.wikipedia they're carrying in facebook, and that my work in mwl.wikipedia is affecting their plan. They're both administrators (mwl:User:Alchimista, mwl:User:Manuel de Sousa), so they have the monopoly over page deletion. Well, they don't delete. Alchimista as a question of principle never deletes. Manuel deletes something, rarely, but he seems to forget to delete what he has previously agreed to delete through discussion. So, since in mwl.wikipedia rules "neither won't do nor won't let do", someone from outside is needed. The deletion is as follows:

Thank you in advance. Garsd (talk) 08:33, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This pages are been evaluated locally. If it takes time to delete or non delete is just because there is a high amount of pages for delection, and it's not easy to attend all the requests on time, when many of them are válid. Biuola, for example, i've pointed locally that it's a valid one, it even is on a dictionary that Garsd pointed localy. So unless is something urgent, we can take care of this requests locally. Alchimista (talk) 11:10, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
mwl:Cronologie de l çdobramientos de ls scándalo de l sanguessugas, mwl:Yamaha XJ 550R Seca, mwl:10 de Julio, mwl:Festibal Ourobison de la Cançon 2013, mwl:Sicosis por windigo, mwl:Festibal Ourobison de la Cançon 2012, mwl:Aneixo:Lhista de persidentes de La Eigreija de Jasus Cristo de ls Santos de ls Redadeiros Dies have already been evaluated in mwl:WP:BF and they're still waiting. What local evaluation they still need, since everybody in the discussion agreed to delete them? Unless someone would like to reopen the discussion. Does someone want to? Does someone wish to reopen the discussion about deleting thoses pages today, tomorrow, the next day? Or are they to stay in limbo for an undefined time? As for the other pages, time is the mother of all certainty. We'll see what time brings and then we'll see what your words are worth, Alchimista. So let's evaluate them locally, let's discuss. There's nothing more I wish so much as to discuss. But discussions don't last endlessly. If you don't counterargue in 2 weeks (14 days) time I'll close any discussion, and don't pop up 60 seconds after closing saying I can't close. That's a fine disruptive tactic you've been using in mwl.wikipedia for the last months. You won't get with that no longer. Either you speak, or you abide by the consensus. Garsd (talk) 12:14, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You're adding big amounts of pages for delection, with long justifications, and closed by yourself. That takes time to process and analyse each one fo them. And honestly, i see no interest on having this discussion here, nor using an inflated speach. Lets discuss it locally and peacefull, ok? Alchimista (talk) 13:38, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for ltg.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

In category ltg:Kategoreja:Candidates for speedy deletion there are 2 spam artcles, 1 non-wikipedia style article and many files without an license. Could someone please delete them?--DJ EV (talk) 09:06, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm hesitant to delete the dictionary pages, like ltg:Lītaunīku_-_latgaļu_vuordineica_/_Lietuvių_-_latgalių_kalbų_žodynas. They could actually be useful. Maybe I'll move them to the incubator. πr2 (t • c) 14:08, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I had the same idea. DJ EV (talk) 07:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
They are not really dictionary pages. They are just help pages and should be moved either to Help or Wikipedia namespace. Ruslik (talk) 19:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Moved those to Project namespace. πr2 (t • c) 18:11, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for ss.wikipedia

An IP user created some personal attack pages about a administrator in Chinese Wikipedia. here is a list of those pages

  1. 烏龜跨氪
  2. User:乌龟跨氪
  3. 乌龟跨氪
  4. 乌拉跨氪
  5. 乌拉跨氪
  6. Template:跨服战
  7. Category:跨服战
  8. 跨服战

I request to deleteing them--Zyuzong (talk) 15:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for reporting them. PiRSquared17 (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for nycwikimedia

Status:    Done

Please delete and salt [2]. A spambot keeps hitting it and I think that full/semiprotecting should be enough to break the spambot. --Rschen7754 09:04, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Not sure about protecting the page though: it might be a honeypot. --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 13:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uncovered canvassing in bxr.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Here is the edit of ex-sysop of this project @ Request for adminship. Translate: OK, are we going to check all those users who voted against? Funny. Yes, I asked my familiar Buryats living in the Czech Republic to vote against a candidate who is going to remove my 700 works. Yes. The talk page of (article about) Honduras is one additional point in favor of not assigning the permission. User:Gubin Mikhail (Mongol) 14:11, 21 March 2013 (UTC) --Soul Train (talk) 14:54, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Ruslik0, after checkusering him. --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 10:58, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Speedy Delete in he.wikivoyage

Status:    Done

Please clean up this category. he:voy:category:ויקימסע: למחיקה מהירה. Neukoln (talk) 08:42, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --MF-W 16:37, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Candidates for speedy deletion on hi.wikiquote

Status:    Done

Long pending. Please help. Rahul Bott (talk) 13:04, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

done. --MF-W 13:25, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for ss.wikipedia

An IP user created some personal attack pages about a administrator in Chinese Wikipedia. here is a list of those pages

  1. 烏龜跨氪
  2. User:乌龟跨氪
  3. 乌龟跨氪
  4. 乌拉跨氪
  5. 乌拉跨氪
  6. Template:跨服战
  7. Category:跨服战
  8. 跨服战

I request to deleteing them--Zyuzong (talk) 15:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Multi-wiki requests

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Miscellaneous&oldid=5413354"