Steward requests/Global permissions
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Successful global rollback requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion, while successful global sysop discussions require no fewer than 2 weeks.
Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests for global rollback permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global rollback for JurgenNL
- Global user: JurgenNL (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I am a sysop on nl-wiki since March 2013 and a few months ago I joined SWMT. I also follow up crosswiki vandals (spam, vandalism only accounts, cross wiki schools) to revert all edits. Global rollback would make my maintenance work much easier helping out keeping Wikipedia in order everywhere. Kind regards, JurgenNL (talk) 16:13, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Support - trusted colleague and knows what he is doing. MoiraMoira (talk) 16:14, 11 November 2013 (UTC)striked-through, see below- Support Jij bent een zeer vriendelijk en behulpzaam Nederlander :p Vogone talk 16:27, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support very active nlwiki admin and OTRS volunteer and will surely make good use of the GR rights. Trijnsteltalk 16:46, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support - I have nothing to add to the votes above. — TBloemink talk 16:49, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Sure. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:11, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Great administrator, great OTRS-member. He is thrusthworthy and he knows what he is doing. Natuur12 (talk) 19:10, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Rschen7754 19:52, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support per above --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:06, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support, good work. --Stryn (talk) 20:09, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support - One of the best admins on nlwiki, very trusted user and not someone that is requesting global rollback because then you have a lot of rights on all wiki's. You have my full support. Southparkfan 20:40, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support of course. I don't have anything to add. --Wiki13 talk 21:03, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Only sparse SWMT activity is known to me. --MF-W 22:17, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 05:21, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Yeah.--Pratyya (Hello!) 05:27, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 06:33, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:39, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Trusted user and sysop on nl.wiki. - FakirNL (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Neutral I appreciate your work, but I have to agree with MF-Warburg. Among your global contributions (excluding those on your main wiki's), there are currently only sixty reverts of vandalism since you've joined the SWMT. In my opinion, this doesn't constitute "making heavy use of revert" (see the global rollback policy). I would've supported this request if you had more experience fighting vandalism in languages you don't understand, but I think you've requested this flag too early. Mathonius (talk) 19:14, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Changed from opposed to neutral: global rollback will surely come in handy for you. Mathonius (talk) 14:56, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support - trusted colleague and knows what he is doing. Will use the tool wisely and will enable him to do more good work in an easier way. MoiraMoira (talk) 16:14, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Why not? -FASTILY 09:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support OK --►Cekli829 19:27, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Kolega2357 (talk) 19:33, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support as GR will allow him to revert vandalism/spam edits more easily. Hope that you will be more active in SWMT work. Cheers, Glaisher [talk] 08:08, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
- Done consensus it to award rights
Requests for global sysop permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
| <translate>
Requests for global IP block exemption
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
| <translate>
Global IP block exempt for Greip
- Global user: Greip (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Why: I haven't done anything that would sanctify this policy, in my opinion. I am merely seeking anonymity while still being able to participate on wikimedia projects.
- What for: Mostly translations on meta, maybe some articles on enwiki (as i have done in the past).
- Why am I blocked: I am using Tor.
(IRC request; neutrally posted on the user's behalf by Nemo 12:15, 7 September 2013 (UTC))
- I am inclined to grant this request. Ruslik (talk) 16:18, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not. He has only 100 edits and I don't really get why he needs to use Tor (anonymity, but he has an account?!). Trijnsteltalk 14:10, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- Pardon? How is anonymity in contrast with having an account? Editing as IP would. --Nemo 20:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- I meant: why does he need to use a Tor when he has an account (with ~100 edits)? And why does he need to use Tor anyway? Trijnsteltalk 20:03, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- We can debate on the value for the stated reason, but "anonymity" is the why. Sorry, I also don't get how using Tor is in contrast with having an account, whether such account has 1, 1k or 1M edits. --Nemo 20:15, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- I meant: why does he need to use a Tor when he has an account (with ~100 edits)? And why does he need to use Tor anyway? Trijnsteltalk 20:03, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Pardon? How is anonymity in contrast with having an account? Editing as IP would. --Nemo 20:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not. He has only 100 edits and I don't really get why he needs to use Tor (anonymity, but he has an account?!). Trijnsteltalk 14:10, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Is there still interest here? --MF-W 15:21, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
If I recall correctly, just the desire to use ToR is not an acceptable reason to get an IP exemption. People who are blocked by government--applied firewalls or believe that their lives or freedoms are in jeopardy are a different matter (although in the latter case, one needs to seriously ask oneself is editing a website worth the potential risk of incarceration or worse). -- Avi (talk) 16:58, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Requests for other global permissions
<translate>
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
Renewal of global editinterface for Tpt
- Global user: Tpt (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
The editinterface right was given to me in November 2012 for a year in order to help small Wikisources to maintain there configuration of the ProofreadPage extension. As it will come soon to expiry, I ask today a renewal of this right. Thanks, Tpt (talk) 10:10, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- This seems reasonable, and Tpt is trusted. Question: how much did you actually use the rights? PiRSquared17 (talk) 13:20, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Done for 12 months, noting rights have been used. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:56, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. @PiRSquared17 I doesn't use this right so much, mostly to fix quickly some JavaScript issues introduced by changes in MediaWiki. Tpt (talk) 07:24, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
See also
- User groups — Information on user groups
- Global rights log — Log of global permissions changes
- Archive
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation