Stewards/Confirm/2016/SPQRobin

SPQRobin[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: nl, en-3, fr-2, de-2
Personal info: I have been steward for two years. As I said in my election and in last year's confirmation, I didn't intend to be among the most active ones, I rather help out now and then e.g. when requested to do so. Though, as I was probably less active the past year than the year before, I considered resigning. However, in the course of this year I intend to evaluate/refocus my different fields of wiki and non-wiki activity. (Having recently become Wikimedia Belgium board member, that will require more time. Another aspect is changes in real life and uncertainty about how that will affect how much time I spend on wiki stuff.) So, by next year's confirmation I will either be a more involved and active steward or I will decide to resign in order to focus on other activities and responsibilities. However, if the community feels I should not be confirmed this time already, I would of course understand.

italiano:

Lingue:
Informazioni personali: translation needed

español:

Idiomas:
Información personal: translation needed

русский:

Языки:
Личная информация: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen:
Informationen zur Person: translation needed

Nederlands:

Taalvaardigheid:
Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed

বাংলা:

ভাষা:
ব্যক্তিগত তথ্যাদি: translation needed

Comments about SPQRobin[edit]

Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep though, I do have some concerns regarding how he estimates consensus. On they other hand, he had the guts to ban a certain problematic user after a RFC. Natuur12 (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 16:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Greenday2 (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --1971markus (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot support confirmation this year. I always appreciate SPQRobin's input and contributions, but he is and has been totally inactive for the majority of his two years in this role. I don't advocate for people to put all of their time and effort into being a steward, but at the same time, we need somewhat active people doing this to contribute to internal discussions and such. Thanks for the work you have done. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Murma174 (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 23:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Osiris (talk) 03:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very well. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mostly per Natuur12. Stewards need balls'n guts. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 07:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good steward. Never had an issue. — T. 07:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 14:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but please be active. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Luke 081515 16:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 20:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sufficiently active, net benefit to steward corps, no reason to consider removal. -- Avi (talk) 22:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity and no concerns — NickK (talk) 02:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Richardkiwi (talk) 20:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Thanks you for your services. --Uğurkent^talk 21:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Uğurkent! I am not sure why you voted removal with the reason 'thank you for your services'. Would you mind explaining? Thanks! Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As I see he/she isn't very active with stewardship works in the last year. Nobody don't let me be misunderstood. Thanks, Jianhui67. --Uğurkent^talk 16:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 18:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove not active enough on meta.--Snaevar (talk) 18:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Berlin-George (talk) 01:21, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Biplab Anand (Talk) 08:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nederland! :-) --GeoTrinity (talk) 18:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Marcus Cyron (talk) 08:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove No contributions to en.wikiversity since 2011 (bad)! --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Might not be that active, but is active enough according to the inactivity policy & he's trusted. Trijnstel_talk 23:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--Muzammil (talk) 08:40, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep - Not very active, like most of your recent actions are from January and fairly inactive the rest of the year. I hope you will be more active in the next year. -Barras talk 19:40, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Another great person I've met during Wikimania. Friendly and helpful, please be more active. ~ Nahid ^Talk 19:48, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 02:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active enough, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep zeker en vast! --Timk70 question? 22:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 09:10, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 23:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 14:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Active enough. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:21, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep nice person and active enough :) --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 06:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and sound steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 08:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]