Steward requests/Global permissions
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Successful global rollback requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion, while successful global renamer and global sysop discussions require no fewer than 2 weeks.
Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests for global rollback permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global rollback for Grind24
- Global user: Grind24 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I'd like to apply for rollback. I've been an active member of the SWMT for some months;doing many reverts and taggings. The rollback tool is more efficient than manually undoing and twinkle so this would make it much easier to revert nonsense/spam edits. Plus there are still some wikis where I have to install my global.js so TW is not there when needed most and I think that rollback globally would help me do the job faster.Grind24 (talk) 21:16, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- "Plus there are still some wikis where I have to install my global.js" - isn't there GlobalCssJs? --Rschen7754 21:23, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- I made reference to TW includes in my global.js that doesn't answer of times when I have the more necessity--Grind24 (talk) 22:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support, good crosswiki activity, good crosswiki editcount, and Grind24 focus on helping GS with "Gs eyes" page are greatly appreciated.--AldNonymousBicara? 21:29, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose For now, because by checking crosswiki edits I don't see that Grind is active on reverting vandalism or spam. I see however a lot of userpage creations which could be avoided by our new Global Userpage extension and some speedy deletion tagging, for which rollback is not required. And while I appreciate your work, this does not give me the impression that GR is needed by now :-( — MarcoAurelio 21:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Marco and the hat collecting clause. See this. Eurodyne (talk) 07:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- Eurodyne if you charge me of hats collecting, what we will say of this,this, email crat to become admin, another diff, on pl.wiki,mediawiki,en.wikibook,es.wikipedia;definitely it is the true hat collection , I don't know why you pursue me every time, then me you advice to assume the good faith.--Grind24 (talk) 11:11, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Grind24: This request is concerning you and does not have anything to do with me. I may have been a hypocrite, but that's beyond the point in this request specifically. Eurodyne (talk) 20:05, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- It might help if you speak in French, which I think would help me understand you better (I can translate). Also, Eurodyne's hat collection, while a problem I do have, does not discredit yours as a concern; I also have this same concern with you.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- Eurodyne if you charge me of hats collecting, what we will say of this,this, email crat to become admin, another diff, on pl.wiki,mediawiki,en.wikibook,es.wikipedia;definitely it is the true hat collection , I don't know why you pursue me every time, then me you advice to assume the good faith.--Grind24 (talk) 11:11, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per Marco and Eurodyne. --Rschen7754 08:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- Also disturbed by the combative behavior towards those opposing this request. --Rschen7754 19:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose En: This hat collection has been concerning. In addition to the vecwiki case, I've seen requests for rights on MediaWiki.org, on testwiki, and now here. I would like you to wait at least a year before making another request for user rights. Fr: Ce remassage des droits d'utilisateurs m'a inquiété. En plus du cas vecwiki, j'ai vu des demandes pour des droits sur MediaWiki.org, sur testwiki, et maintenant, ici. Je voudrais que tu attende au mois une anée avant de faire une nouvelle demande pour des droits d'utilisateurs.--Jasper Deng (talk) 08:38, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per Marco and, I could not see heavy use of reverts globally.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 16:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - Unfortunately, you have had a history of hat collecting. I do indeed agree with Jasper on this one. Sorry. Caliburn (talk) 08:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- comment: As far as I can see, there's hardly any reverts outside of Meta and English Wikipedia. Most of your activity has been content translations and welcoming users. Of course, there's that "issue" the others above have mentioned. I recommend using Twinkle across more wikis other than just the English ones. Tropicalkitty (talk) 09:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Request withdrawn Decidedly all seems to indicate that it won't happen well,in addition to this interpretation of hats collection, so I withdraw --Grind24 (talk) 15:48, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Global rollback for Devwebtel
- Global user: Devwebtel (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Global rollbacker rights will help me reverting vandalisms (I'm member of SWMT and I'm voiced on #cvn-sw IRC channel). If you grant me this rights, you can delete my CAPTCHA exemptions rights (globall rollbacker group has skipcaptcha right). --Devwebtel (query) 12:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral Not really sure after seeing this.--AldNonymousBicara? 13:03, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- What you mean? Too few edits? --Devwebtel (query) 14:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Too few edits outside of the wiki that your account was created, not enough cross-wiki activity. User group situation is not as bad (yet) as some of our recent global rollback requests we've seen, but it's starting to become a bit concerning. The global CAPTCHA exemptions is really not needed in my opinion as they become waived pretty much when you reach autoconfirmed status on every wiki you regularly visit (although it's a bit higher on the eswiki with 50 edits, but very low on others). Tropicalkitty (talk) 17:25, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Rollback right will help me a lot (quicker rollbacking), but I can wait if you want. --Devwebtel (query) 19:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- You have too few edits overall (only around 2500) also; I would suggest reapplying later. --Rschen7754 19:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Ok. How many global edits should I have? About 5000? --Devwebtel (query) 20:23, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- A question like this misses the point: what I would expect to see is showing enough experience to revert vandalism across many wikis, and a proper understanding of the mission of Wikimedia. --Rschen7754 23:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Ok. How many global edits should I have? About 5000? --Devwebtel (query) 20:23, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- You have too few edits overall (only around 2500) also; I would suggest reapplying later. --Rschen7754 19:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Rollback right will help me a lot (quicker rollbacking), but I can wait if you want. --Devwebtel (query) 19:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Generally I understand. When I am not sure that some edit is vandalism, I not revert it. --Devwebtel (query) 04:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Closed. After more than 5 days of discussion, I find that there's no consensus to promote Devwebtel to global rollbacker. —MarcoAurelio 14:49, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Requests for global sysop permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
| <translate>
Global sysop for Syum90
- Global user: Syum90 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 9 June 2015 15:17 UTC
I think I can do a good work with this tool. Regards.--Syum90 (talk) 15:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support Matiia (talk) 15:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- And when would you apply too? ;) Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:52, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- I concur with Jianhui67 please also apply, we are running short of GS because many of them become steward on last election (lost 3 GS) and also 2 of them recently de-GS'd because of innactivity, in short period of time we already lost 5 GS.--AldNonymousBicara? 16:12, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- I thought Matiia is already GS :) I agree with Jianhui67 and Aldnon, please apply too :-) tufor (talk) 14:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support Of course you can. XD Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:52, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support definitely. --Stryn (talk) 16:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support Without a doubt, I have been eyeing Syum90 for GS, I also already ask Matiia. I am satisfied now there at least will be enough GS.--AldNonymousBicara? 16:12, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support why not?--Infinite0694 (Talk) 16:51, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support yes please. Ajraddatz (talk) 16:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support This is a very annoying small wiki patroller: when they are online, each time I spot some vandalism and try to do something about it, Syum90 has already corrected it, making me feel frustrated and useless! :-) Seriously: of course!!! --Randykitty (talk) 17:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support I wish you success. --Uğurkenttalk 18:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support. Érico Wouters (msg) 18:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support Of course.--Grind24 (talk) 18:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Rschen7754 01:13, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- I've also noticed that Syum90 is very active in SWMT almost everyday and seems to be doing great work. Also, (s)he is very nice. :-) Glaisher (talk) 05:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support Definitely. I concur with all of the above. Trijnsteltalk 10:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support - excellent candidate. QuiteUnusual (talk) 10:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support has been a magnificent job (quick and accurate), I welcome the nomination — billinghurst sDrewth 11:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support - perfect candidate. When he is online I am literally unable to do anything, because he almost everytime revert revision or tag article faster than me. At times the fact that I'm constantly the slower one is annoying me a little bit, but I have the utmost respect for Syum's tremendous work. tufor (talk) 14:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support Hands down. Eurodyne (talk) 02:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support - I agree, excellent candidate --Nastoshka (talk) 17:26, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Good candidate... Wagino 20100516 (talk) 20:08, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Kolega2357 (talk) 21:47, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support --L235 (talk) enwiki 01:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support - I nominated this user for adminship at es.wikibooks, and I do not regret it. Very hardworking, has reduced the level of junk of the project while also brought to the project a lot of improvements. Its use of the tools have been correct and accurate. When in doubt he's been unafraid to ask. I think he will be a good addition to the global sysops team. Thank you for volunteering. —MarcoAurelio 20:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- support —DerHexer (Talk) 11:45, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for your service. Vogone (talk) 13:00, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Green Giant (talk) 20:56, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support - per the same reason as Matiia's request. Thank you for your hard work and help, Syum90. Tropicalkitty (talk) 22:12, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support--DangSunM (talk) 00:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Best regards--6AND5 (talk) 20:35, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 04:26, 7 June 2015 (UTC).
- :-) --Alan (talk) 10:56, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Courcelles 23:08, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Global sysop for Matiia
- Global user: Matiia (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 18 June 2015 20:25 UTC
Hi, this tool would be very useful for me, mainly to block users and delete pages. Thank you for your time :) Matiia (talk) 20:25, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support definitely. Stryn (talk) 20:34, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Natuur12 (talk) 20:39, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support I waited impatiently :) --Grind24 (talk) 20:46, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support definitely! Thanks for volunteering. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:53, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support - a name I have regularly seen reversing vandalism on several wikis. Green Giant (talk) 20:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Excellent SWMT member, fully qualified for this flag. Vogone (talk) 20:57, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Most certainly. Trijnsteltalk 21:09, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Obviously! Finally! after losing 5 GS now we got 2 fully qualified GS. I am pleased.--AldNonymousBicara? 21:15, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Yes, yes, yes :-) tufor (talk) 21:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support No objections at all here. One of the best in handling various tasks around SWMT and translations. Matiia has very quickly become familiar with everything ever since from the start. I hope for the best! :) Tropicalkitty (talk) 22:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:42, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support--DangSunM (talk) 00:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support YES!!--Infinite0694 (Talk) 06:34, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Of course. There's no way I can possibly fit all of Matiia's positive traits in one comment based on what I've seen so far on both Wikimedia and Wikia. Good luck with the mop! --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 03:14, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Uğurkenttalk 15:24, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Yes!! :-) --Glaisher (talk) 16:09, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Rschen7754 16:12, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Eurodyne (talk) 17:53, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Best regards--6AND5 (talk) 20:37, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support. Érico Wouters (msg) 21:40, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 04:26, 7 June 2015 (UTC).
- :-) --Alan (talk) 10:56, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- support, welcome nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:51, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Courcelles 23:09, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support No doubt.--Syum90 (talk) 07:19, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Requests for global IP block exemption
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
| <translate>
Requests for global rename permissions
Steward requests/Global permissions/Global renamers
Global rename for K6ka
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: K6ka (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 20 June 2015 14:25 UTC
Hello, I'm K6ka, and I'd like to request the global renamer tool partly due to a suggestion by Xeno, who is a local en.wiki bureaucrat and a fellow global renamer. I'm afraid I do not hold the sysop or bureaucrat flags anywhere on Wikimedia, but I am very involved in the en.wikipedia changing username process, working as a clerk there for well over a year now (before the rename tool was removed from bureaucrats), so I know about the renaming process. Having the global rename tool would be useful as it would allow me to process requests instead of having to leave a message and waiting for a global renamer to handle it. I have read and understood the Global rename policy and I plan to put this tool to good use. Thanks. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 14:25, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support K6ka is active in the rename process on enwiki, and has enough experience from that to know how to use the bit properly. I would usually like to see a sysop flag, but the candidate's experience compensates for a lack of one (and that is more important, since sysops have nothing to do with renaming). Thanks for volunteering! Ajraddatz (talk) 15:58, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support mainly per Ajraddatz. Even though this user does not hold sysop rights anywhere, I feel that he is certainly qualified for this role. K6ka, thank you for your impressive, hardworking and gnomish work on enwiki renaming request page. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 16:02, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Well-qualified for the role, with much experience in the changing username process. Probably the only reason he doesn't hold administrative privileges on en is that he hasn't accepted any nomination yet. As one of the most active bureaucrats in the enwiki renaming process, I've come to rely on his participation in the clerking process, rarely having to deviate from the path he suggests for the customer or processor. Also active on simple wiki, so would be able to help coordinate the CHU process on that project as well. –xeno 16:03, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support For a while, I've thought that we should encourage (good) CHU clerks on enwiki to run and I'm glad Xeno took the step to ask. --Rschen7754 16:12, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support been good working being a rename clerk.--AldNonymousBicara? 12:44, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Requests for other global permissions
<translate>
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
Global editinterface for Matma Rex
- Global user: Matma Rex (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I've been a global interfaceeditor for the past year and my permissions expired. I still need them for the same purpose :) As a MediaWiki developer working primarily on JavaScript, I find more and more often that I need to make simple fixes to gadgets on various wikis using deprecated features, or update such gadgets copied from another place to the most recent version. I am sysop at the Polish Wikipedia (pl:User:Matma Rex) and mediawiki.org (mw:User:Matma Rex). Last year's request: Steward requests/Global permissions/2014-06#Global editinterface for Matma Rex. Matma Rex (talk) 17:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Legoktm (talk) 18:14, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- I am planning to approve this if no objection raises in 24h. Matanya (talk) 18:14, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Matanya. I support extending Matma Rex's access. For what it's worth though, the policy clearly states that requests will last five days, and I don't think that is an unreasonable time to make candidates wait while opinions are solicited. Ajraddatz (talk) 18:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Formally object to speedy closure per Meta:Snowball, which is policy. Nothing in this statement should be interpreted against the candidate. —MarcoAurelio 14:46, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Matanya. I support extending Matma Rex's access. For what it's worth though, the policy clearly states that requests will last five days, and I don't think that is an unreasonable time to make candidates wait while opinions are solicited. Ajraddatz (talk) 18:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- I am planning to approve this if no objection raises in 24h. Matanya (talk) 18:14, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Rzuwig► 21:09, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for your work.--Grind24 (talk) 21:36, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support - However there is no need to rush the request within 24 hours as Ajraddatz says. -Barras talk 10:23, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support already +2.--AldNonymousBicara? 11:42, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- support —DerHexer (Talk) 11:44, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- support, and should be closed quickly — billinghurst sDrewth 13:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support tufor (talk) 21:59, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Openbk (talk) 17:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Krenair (talk • contribs) 18:11, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Done Matanya (talk) 22:37, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- This makes me a little wonder, didn't at least 3 users above oppose an early closure of this request? Vogone (talk) 22:48, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Dammit, freaking time zones. it is the 7th, not the 8th. I hate myself. Matanya (talk) 22:50, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- This makes me a little wonder, didn't at least 3 users above oppose an early closure of this request? Vogone (talk) 22:48, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Global editinterface for Ori Livneh
- Global user: Ori Livneh (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I would like to be added to the global interface editors group. I am principal performance engineer at the Wikimedia Foundation, but I also hack on the site in my spare time, and have been an editor since 2006, so I have a fair understanding of norms of behavior and etiquette. If my request is approved, I will use the permission to update code for JavaScript API changes, and to make performance optimizations, when such optimizations can be applied without compromising functionality. I am a sysop on MediaWiki.org (mw:User:Ori Livneh). --Ori Livneh (talk) 18:10, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Legoktm (talk) 18:14, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- I am planning to approve this if no objection raises in 24h. Matanya (talk) 18:14, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Formally object to speedy closure per Meta:Snowball, which is policy. Nothing in this statement should be interpreted against the candidate. —MarcoAurelio 14:46, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- I am flattered that my request is not controversial, but I also really don't mind waiting the requisite deliberation period. --Ori Livneh (talk) 22:12, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- I am planning to approve this if no objection raises in 24h. Matanya (talk) 18:14, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Ajraddatz (talk) 18:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for your work--Grind24 (talk) 21:38, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support, but as above, no need to rush the request. -Barras talk 10:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- support —DerHexer (Talk) 11:44, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- support, and should be closed quickly — billinghurst sDrewth 13:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Eurodyne (talk) 18:05, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Krenair (talk • contribs) 18:12, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Done Matanya (talk) 22:37, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
OTRS global member for Someguy1221
- Global user: Someguy1221 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Thanks, --Tiptoety talk 18:02, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Done. Ajraddatz (talk) 18:58, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
remove global permission (OTRS member)
- Global user: Xaris333 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Thank you, Rjd0060 (talk) 12:47, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
See also
- User groups — Information on user groups
- Global rights log — Log of global permissions changes
- Archive
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation