Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat/Archives/2020-04

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Prohibit some long usernames?

I proposed to:

  • Prohibit creation of username which is longer than 40 characters and contain some keywords on Meta
  • Prevent new accounts (<4 days) with such usernames to edit Meta (targeting autocreated accounts)

This may not completely stop the abuse, but may reduce the negative impact by vandals.--GZWDer (talk) 18:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

  • Hey GZWDer, this is the request for help page. Proposals of this type would be most appropriate in the form of a request for comment because community consensus would be needed. ~riley (talk) 18:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
  • So per ~riley, and also if we can avoid it I would rather not have a new local username policy. We are in a big need of a global one, but local policies do not really make sense since SUL finalisation was completed. --Base (talk) 01:44, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
  • I think I know what OP is driving at, to reduce usernames like XXX have XXX19 and must go to h*** something like that, I had been blocking so many of them recently. However, per ~riley, this needs RFC and I rather not as this seems to mandate a global username policy which by itself isn't feasible (due to SUL) and even if feasible, unlikely to pass. I will rather we manage by blocking, RD/OSing, locking/supressing the accounts and we might alter the filters that we have if needed as well as changing the blacklists. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:19, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Vandals would simply shorten their usernames to 39 characters. The only result of this would be to bother some volunteers on other projects (since this proposal would effect Meta only) who wouldn't be able to take part in discussions here. Also, as ~riley said, this is not the proper place to make such proposals. It would require a RfC. Vermont (talk) 18:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: ~riley (talk) 21:07, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Talk:Steward requests/Global

I propose to indefinitely semiprotect this page. Most recent edits are vandalism and a legitmate global block or lock requests (include e.g. requests by public figures who do not edit Wikimedia project to lock impersonation accounts) may be handled by Email or IRC.--GZWDer (talk) 05:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

  • It's really not the place of Meta admins to be doing long-term protection of steward pages, imoh. The protection log only shows precedence for short term protection and because the page acts as a honeypot, I think leaving it as is, is most appropriate. If you think it should be, I recommend posting on the Stewards' noticeboard. ~riley (talk) 07:54, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
    • Seconded ~riley. I am inclined to leave it open per honeypot and there are many valid requests from well known, established users who just cannot edit SRG which I transferred. I am also not inclined to touch meta pages regarding to stewards. I think since the last steward who protected Tegel used 1 day protection, I think the stewards had decided against long term protection. I don't see what else we can do here but to watch, which I will. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 08:53, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Comment Comment LTAs are going to LTA, and I would much prefer that they did it there on an intensely watched page where they can do little damage, and can be quickly managed. Anyway, as said stewards can manage their pages.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:48, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --AldnonymousBicara? 01:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

User:Workfromhomelegitjob

Spam-only account, please block. -- CptViraj (📧) 17:55, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Locked --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: DannyS712 (talk) 21:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Deletion

Hello. Can you delete the pages that this user created? Thanks--Turkmen talk 23:11, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Done, thanks. Matiia (talk) 23:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Matiia (talk) 23:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/91.122.6.126

Can you take a look at the contributions of this IP? Thanks.--Turkmen talk 11:16, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Deleted. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 11:21, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:26, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/130.193.252.69

Please delete the wrong translations over there. Thanks--Turkmen talk 00:47, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Done ‐‐1997kB (talk) 03:46, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: DannyS712 (talk) 04:00, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

About User:Derslek page

Hello All! Many of you may not know, but we had a problem with this user on the Tatar Wikipedia. The problem is currently settled (for more see this, this and WP Signpost).

I thought the problem was settled until I found an inscription in three languages on the user's personal page, where the user focuses on ethnicity and labels me, two stewards and two other users. Words in Russian are especially offensive. I want to urge administrators to take immediate steps to exhaust the attacks on us. Kindly, --Mehman 97 20:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: CT301 talkcontributions 23:42, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/91.104.210.98

Can you please delete the pages that this user created? Thanks.--Turkmen talk 07:50, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~riley (talk) 07:50, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Fix categories of Legal/Legal Policies

Hi!

Can you please fix Legal/Legal Policies categories for translations, turning 

[[Category:Legal]]
[[Category:Legal department]]

into 

[[Category:Legal{{#translation:}}]]
[[Category:Legal department{{#translation:}}]]
[[Category:Closed Meta-Wiki requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat]]

And maybe removing the generic Legal cat, since Legal dep cat belongs to Legal cat (I’m not a specialist of Meta categorizing)? --Pols12 (talk) 19:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Done, thanks for your message. —Sgd. Hasley 19:34, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: CT301 talkcontributions 19:35, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Data dump torrents

Hi,

Could someone ask IonPike to stop removing the intro on Data dump torrents that contains all the rules and instructions to make a data dump torrent? If they wish to make substantial changes, they must go to the talk page first.

Thanks. --Thibaut (talk) 20:03, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~riley (talk) 21:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Meta:Requests for limited adminship/TheSandDoctor

Can a bureaucrat please close the above request to allow TheSandDoctor's proposed work to begin? Thank you! ~riley (talk) 20:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~riley (talk) 21:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Request for MassMessage sender right

Hello, I would like to request the MassMessage sender right to be able to send the messages different user for my coming projects about Indic Wikisource. I am working as a Wikisource advisor at CIS-A2K team. My official CIS-A2K id is User:Jayanta (CIS-A2K). Thanks - Jayantanth (talk) 07:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

@Jayantanth: How long will you need it? And can we have a sample of the MMS and list of users to send it to? Thanks.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 08:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
@Jayantanth: Can we have some replies, thanks. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:30, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
@Camouflaged Mirage:, sorry for late reply. Most of the case I shall send the messages to all 12 Indic Wikisource village Pump and active user of all Indic Wikisource users talkpages. The message will be like this and this. Thanks. Jayantanth (talk) 09:51, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
If you give me the non-expire access, for mass messages, that will be very helpful. Jayantanth (talk) 09:55, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
@Jayantanth: Looks okay, granted.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:00, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:04, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Meta:Requests for adminship/DannyS712

Would you please look at this page? Created by IP.--Turkmen talk 22:48, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Done by Hasley--Turkmen talk 22:49, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
RFA deleted, IP blocked. Clearly a LTA. Thanks for your message. —Sgd. Hasley 22:58, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Sgd. Hasley 22:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

false-positive

Hi. There is a false-positive of Abuse filter while translating Tech News. Please check. Thanks. — 밝은소년 12:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

@밝은소년: Created on behalf. Sorry for the inconvenience.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks :D — 밝은소년 13:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
No problem. Do report back if any further issues occurred. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:06, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:06, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

User:‎PalmaStrahan33

‎PalmaStrahan33 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser)

Spam only account: spambot. 27.92.131.210 20:07, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~riley (talk) 20:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

User talk:79.170.192.142

79.170.192.142 xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye

Blatant attack material, please see the user talk page, legal threats. 58.142.207.215 22:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

2 Proxys Blocked-𐐎ℹ𝕜ⅈ𝕭𝒂𝕪ⅇ𝕣 👤💬 22:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 222.112.93.67 22:47, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Report concerning User:80.31.149.109

80.31.149.109 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) — Reasons: Spambot Samuele2002 (Talk!) 16:57, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Dealt with. Thanks for reporting. Defender (talk) 17:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 17:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

User:Adwordsppcexpert

Spamming, see AF log. -- CptViraj (📧) 07:14, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~riley (talk) 07:15, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/FDC_Ombudsperson_elections/2013/yue

Not translated at all. Please delete. Minorax (talk) 08:20, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~riley (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

関西ウィキメディアユーザ会/ia

If google is accurate enough, this whole page appears to be in Russian. Interlingua is suppose to be using Latin text. This is obviously google translated. Minorax (talk) 08:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

(Edit conflict.) Deleted. Machine translations are usually worse than nothing. Pages are not improved by using poorly translated text. I see no value in keeping or moving it. Also they were indef blocked for inserting machine translations on MediaWiki.org. —Sgd. Hasley 13:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:30, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Meta-wiki block

As described here I’m caught in a meta-wiki block. Is there anything that can be done to let me edit? Am I a candidate for being IP-block exempt? Thanks for any help. Mike Christie (talk) 22:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

@Mike Christie: Where are you keen to edit, if only enwp, you might want to ask for a local IPBE (local IPBE can bypass Global blocks), if you need to edit other projects, please request a GIPBE at SRGP. Feel free to ask me on my talkpage for assistance to apply. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 06:53, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks -- I just got an email from the stewards saying I've been given a GIPBE, so I'm OK to edit now. Mike Christie (talk) 10:10, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Okay, glad it went well for you. Mike Christie Feel free to ask for any more assistance if needed. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:21, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:21, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Alternate account

I created an alternate account named "クローバータイガース" in Japanese Wikipedia. I would like to notify users that it is a doppelganger account created by me, but I cannot edit クローバータイガース user page because of an error message that blocking edit. Can you help me? --Clover Tigers (talk) 16:21, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

In addition, I would like to edit クローバータイガース user page.--Clover Tigers (talk) 16:26, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Done I've flagged your account as autopatrolled, you should now be able to edit both pages. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:31, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks a lot.--Clover Tigers (talk) 16:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:31, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

False positive

I am trying to create a new request for a new language ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Requests_for_new_languages/Wiktionary_Cal%C3%B3 ), but when I try to publish the page this action is repeatedly disallowed by the rule "Antispam". I am not making any spam or advertising. I have just included 3 external references to journal articles and one external reference to a cultural web page. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ddrazir (talk) 16:10, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

@Ddrazir: Apologies for the false positive. Created on your behalf, you can edit the page now. Regards,Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 19:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
@Camouflaged Mirage: Perfect, thank you! Ddrazir (talk) 11:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: DannyS712 (talk) 10:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Importer for translation

Hey, can anyone mark Importer page for translation? Thanks--MrJaroslavik (talk) 18:47, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

It is already translated using a different method (eg see Importer/hr) --DannyS712 (talk) 18:52, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
I’m migrating the page. --Pols12 (talk) 21:04, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Done You can translate safely. Please ping me if there is still an internationalization issue in the page. --Pols12 (talk) 00:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Pols12 (talk) 00:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism

Special:Contributions/178.247.181.163 Plaese Block and delete its page. Thanks --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 21:10, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

@Samuele2002: This is actually the Wikinger Long-term abuser, so please report the IP address to Steward requests/Global. 114.134.189.2 21:13, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Done --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 21:19, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Sgd. Hasley 21:24, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Closure of Request for comment/ Meta admin ~riley is abusing power

Since I am involved, I shall not close. Can an uninvolved sysop close this. This is disruptive and the user had been repeatedly posting such statements about at first a trwp b'crat block them on trwp, and progresses to meta admins abusing power. May someone review, thanks. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:45, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Not me, that is the space for the conversation, and they are entitled to their opinion, and to start the conversation. Contributors are allowed to be painful and to prosecute a case. Is it out of scope? If not, then it should stay, whether I agree or not.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Of course it's within the scope here, I am asking for speedy close to prevent further disruption by a totally unmerited RFC. I am concerned that this RFC had gone off-topic and their userpage is problematic. I agree to an extent with you that it should stay then. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC) (Expanded on 15:54, 25 April 2020 (UTC))
Not done I don't see a reason to close it. If you believe that ~riley's actions were appropriate, then state as such, and when commentary has ended on the page an uninvolved editor/admin will close it. We do not close RfC's because we do not like them or because we believe they're unfounded; we're not here to censor people. Regards, Vermont (talk) 15:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Sure, I accept this. Before e/c I was to withdraw this request myself. Thanks for the explanation. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 16:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 16:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Mark User:Tgr/WMHU 2019 report for translation

Hi! We'd like to experiment with using meta for translating Wikimedia Hungary reports (traditionally we have used Google Docs, but some pople have complained that they could contribute more if there was a "bite-sized" translation interface, and the Translate extension seemed like the easiest way of achieving that). If that's an unproblematic use of Meta, please mark User:Tgr/WMHU 2019 report for translation (the source language is Hungarian / hu). Thanks! --Tgr (talk) 13:57, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Done Typically we would have it in its final home, though we can do it where it is.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:05, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: The source language is still 'en' not 'hu'. RhinosF1 (talk) 14:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Yes, was just undoing it. Need to dig a little deeper, but it may be welded to the base language of the wiki. I forget.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! It's an experiment, didn't want to put it under a "serious" title. Previously we have uploaded reports as PDF, I want to see if the translation workflow provides enough extra engagement to be worth the overhead. --Tgr (talk) 14:16, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Done Had to dig into both Translate's and MediaWiki's sourcecode, but managed to find the right way. @Billinghurst: You need to use Special:PageLanguage to set the page's language to Hungarian, and then make it for translation like you usually do. Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:21, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Tks4Fish’s April 20 /56 rangeblock

Sorry, I don’t know the exact IP. I edit from that, so I’d like it to be anononly. Thanks.

Regards,

Steven1825 (talk)

19:26, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

You'd better to ask Tks4Fish directly. Ruslik (talk) 20:04, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Nothing more to do, I am not lifting the anon-only meta block as the disruption to meta is very heavy, I will strongly oppose any lifting. As of global block, it's now anon-only. I guess all are well and unblocks for global blocks cannot be processed on RFH. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Report concerning User:117.0.107.152

117.0.107.152 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) — Reasons: Creating nonsense pages Esteban16 (talk) 17:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Listo. —Sgd. Hasley 17:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Sgd. Hasley 17:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Special:AbuseFilter/16

See Special:AbuseFilter/16 (private)

I was going through and updating uses of deprecated abuse filter variables, but couldn't save this filter because the current content fails the syntax checks. Can someone take a look? Not sure what the result of the failure is given that it was saved before the syntax changed (I assume) - does it still work at all? --DannyS712 (talk) 04:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

@DannyS712: check now, think it was the syntax of the section with \x7F in it. — xaosflux Talk 14:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Well, the change went through, so its not invalid :) Thanks --DannyS712 (talk) 20:24, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: DannyS712 (talk) 15:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Request for MassMessage sender right to send Wikidata Weekly Summary newsletter

Hi, I would like to request the MassMessage sender right to be able to send the Weekly Summary newsletter instead of Lea Lacroix (WMDE). I am the new Community Communications Manager for Wikidata/Wikibase at Wikimedia Germnay. Thanks.
Mohammed Sadat (WMDE) (talk) 11:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Done. —Sgd. Hasley 11:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: DannyS712 (talk) 15:16, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Talk:Spam blacklist

Please semi-protect this page for a reasonable amount of time to stop disruption. Thanks. Ahmadtalk 20:12, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

And, in my opinion, some revisions need revdel for username or summary. Ahmadtalk 20:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Protected for 3 hours, edits revdeleted. —Sgd. Hasley 20:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Reluctantly I have added the identified page to AF/200. If there any problems, then please remove that line completely. Filter wasn't designed for that page type, so it will need to be watched for false positives (FP). As it is a low traffic page it may take some days to identify FPs.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: DannyS712 (talk) 08:40, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Request for help from TA's

Hey can anyone mark for translate:

thanks.--MrJaroslavik (talk) 15:08, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

I have done so for the first and third, I have not done it for the second as I think there is no need for it (like I think the whole page is superfluous and SRM should be used instead). --MF-W 15:51, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
If the page is there, I think it should be translated, but okay & thanks.--MrJaroslavik (talk) 15:56, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Another request > can anyone mark for translate current version of Global sysops page? I removed "Global blocks" parameter, thanks. --MrJaroslavik (talk) 16:52, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Done updated GS --DannyS712 (talk) 17:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

+ Global rollback, you can check my change (i removed part with GS list, because not all GS have GR perms), thanks --MrJaroslavik (talk) 18:49, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

I reverted that edit - that is the policy that a GS that isn't a GR can get GR on request --DannyS712 (talk) 18:51, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: DannyS712 (talk) 08:40, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Page User:Ruhubelent

Due to what I consider a breach of Meta:Civility by this user to their global user page, I have reverted their edit (again) and inhibited their ability to edit their user page for a period of time. The community over a period of time has applied a standard to global meta user pages due to their global nature, with this standard arising through our general practice and discussions for requests for deletion. The instruction that I provided to the user was that they could have statements as subpages, and link to them, however, they believe that they should be able to have their accusatory statements for all wiki display.

Putting this here for the discussion of admins, and for their review. It is not an action that I like to undertake, though feel that it is our general approach at this time.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

No issue with the block, although I am as involved as billinghurst (or more). I was asking a close of the RFC partly due to the combination of his userpage + edits elsewhere which by creating the RFC on admin abuse, I am seeing a general disruptive pattern. If it's not for meta:civility it can be for disruptive editing. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 08:55, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Meta:Scope or Meta:Civility has nothing against sharing information about your Wiki-past/history on your page. I am not sharing information about the partners I date, I am not sharing info about someone else, exposing their privacy. Even the ones who shared what football they support are not prevented from doing so but when I share info about my Wiki-history, Wiki-profile, Wiki-activity that becomes a problem? MetaWiki is a place where users (including stewards, admins etc) may look at my page and for some reasons (like requests) may need to look at why I am blocked. Sincerely yours, --Ruhubelent (talk) 09:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Comment Comment I see that we have Request for comment/Admin Billinghurst is abusing power - limiting/editing my userpage for no reason. Can I ask that this be moved, preferably without a redirect, to the Meta: namespace Meta:Request for comment/Admin Billinghurst is abusing power - limiting/editing my userpage for no reason as this is local issue, not a global issue.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:04, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Moved to Meta:Requests for comment/Admin Billinghurst is abusing power - limiting editing my userpage for no reason and Meta:Requests for comment/Meta admin ~riley is abusing power also. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 09:17, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
It seems my userpage is more of a `global` issue than an `assertion` about an admin abusing his/her power :D:D:D:D LoL. --Ruhubelent (talk) 09:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Not sure what you are meaning. My action is local, the admins rights are local, any deletion discussion would be local that makes it a local RfC. The decision back when was that a meta user page would be made global, there was no other commitment.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:38, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta:Requests_for_help_from_a_sysop_or_bureaucrat/Archives/2020-04&oldid=20494012"