Stewards/confirm/2009/es

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards‎ | confirm‎ | 2009
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning The 2009 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
In other languages: mul (mul) العربية (ar) বাংলা (bn) Deutsch (de) English (en) español (es) français (fr) Bahasa Indonesia (id) italiano (it) 日本語 (ja) 한국어 (ko) latviešu (lv) norsk bokmål (nb) Nederlands (nl) norsk (no) português (pt) русский (ru) српски / srpski (sr) [edit]
Stewards (2009 confirmations)
Español :

La confirmación 2007 ha terminado.

Las elecciones del 2009 a stewards son una buena oportunidad para ver si aún estamos contentos con nuestros steward actuales. Para facilitar el proceso, así es como se organizarán las cosas:

Durante la elección 2009, menciona si estás descontento con alguna de las personas listadas debajo y porqué. Por ejemplo, puedes mencionar inactividad o comportamiento negativo. Los stewards inactivos, de acuerdo a las políticas de steward, perderán su acceso.

Al final de la elección, los stewards actuales, junto con los nuevos, considerarán las quejas en esta página y decidirán eliminar el estado steward según sea necesario, tomando en cuenta tanto los comentarios de la comunidad como la propia perspectiva y entendimiento del trabajo. Todos los stewards pasarán por este proceso después de cada elección.

Ver también:


Purge the cache of this page?

.anaconda[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: statement here

Comments about .anaconda[edit]

The following discussion is closed: Resigned.

Hello, I was thinking on resigning in the last days due to inactivity - this is the reason I ignored this page; just done. Thanks for expressing your opinion. --.anaconda 23:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Andre Engels[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: nl, de-3, en-4, fr-2, most other Germanic/Romanic languages-1
  • Personal info: statement here

Comments about Andre Engels[edit]

The following discussion is closed: Confirmed. Nihil Obstat Effeietsanders 01:50, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Angela[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: I've been a steward since 2004 and I hope to continue being useful in this area. I also chair the Wikimedia:Advisory Board and help with Wikimania (jury and program). I'm an admin on meta, the English Wikipedia, and the advisory and foundation wikis. I haven't been as active as I'd planned to be this time last year due to spending all my spare time on planning my wedding! Since that happened (in November), I have been more active within Wikimedia generally and plan to continue this. The steward areas I focus on are changing rights and deleting cross-wiki spam (example). I'm happy to do other steward tasks as well like SUL requests and global blocks but at least in the past couple of months, there have been no requests that weren't already handled immediately by a few super-active stewards! I'm in #wikimedia-stewards if I'm on IRC and can easily be reached by email in emergencies as I'm online 16 hours a day.

Comments about Angela[edit]

The following discussion is closed: Confirmed, no objections. —Pathoschild 01:56:03, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Not amazingly active, but still, I'm happy for her to continue. Majorly talk 00:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Doing a good job as a steward, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Thank you for your job :) Lvova 00:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Although not overwhelmingly active, you're doing well. Please be around more continously. :) --Thogo (talk) 01:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • A bit inactive, perhaps too much so Prodego talk 03:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Agree with everyone so far, except Prodego :) ... Plus Angela's comments on the stewards-l mailing list (something non-stewards don't have visibility to... trust me it's true :) ) have been sage, and she takes feedback awesomely for someone as senior as she is. Here's hoping she can find more time to be with us this year. ++Lar: t/c 04:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Her wedding to another wikimedian kept her busy for a while but now she is back, welcome :) ..--Cometstyles 04:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support COI - I'm also up for confirmation. She has been there since the start and is well-trusted by the community. I say keep as steward. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 05:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Confirm. Good work. MBisanz talk 06:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Not highly active, but her experience is a valuable contribution, and she does good work.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support I imagine a more productive 2009, Wedding certainly kept her preoccupied before. --Charitwo 23:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support - A lifetime experience on different issues is valuable Galoubet 11:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support cf. Thogo. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support to confirm, -jkb- 17:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Endorse. keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Duh. —Sean Whitton / 18:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Confirm, of course. — Dan | talk 23:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Confirm Agree with Majorly. --Meno25 23:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support---Zyephyrus 21:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Confirm, she is doing a good job. —Dferg (meta-w:es.) 15:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support fr33kman t - c 04:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Confirm, Angela isn't inactive (I'd prefer she helped a bit more though). guillom 11:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Woudloper 11:10, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support support Thanks for the job you're doing. Finn Rindahl 11:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support--Ahonc 22:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support, per above. Alex Pereira falaê 15:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support, and I'm glad to see her more active lately. Kylu 20:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support aleichem 11:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support ...Aurora... 13:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Kaganer 17:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:12, 15 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support per Majorly. Juliancolton 00:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Techman224Talk 04:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Not so active, but still a very important person in Wikimedian community. --Millosh 12:5* 8, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Shizhao 13:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Alefbe 22:49, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support and expect her to be more active now that she's happily married :) --FiliP × 17:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Anthere[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: fr, en
  • Personal info: I have been a steward since the first election. I am also admin on fr.wiki, en.wiki, and commons as well as bureaucrat on fr.wiki. I am a founding member of Wikimedia France and a past trustee (and chair !) of Wikimedia Foundation. I currently mostly edit on fr.wiki, as well as a bit sometimes commons and fr.books (though often unloggued). And I do quite a lot at the chapter level. To be fair, my activity as steward in the past year has been low (hmmm, very low). First because as trustee, it was simply not a good idea to use these tools. And then I took a psychological break. But I'll be happy to help more in the coming year. I am usually available on irc as well for urgent needs. Cheers

Comments about Anthere[edit]

  • Not amazingly active, but she was busy doing other important things for Wikimedia. I'm happy for her to continue. Majorly talk 00:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Avialable via irc if there is something urgent, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • You are not very active as a steward, but available on a nearly daily basis which is absolutely fine for me. Merci. --Thogo (talk) 01:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Very few activities in the last year - doesn't seem to be needed in urgent cases, too. Please reduce the number of stewards to the really needed. --APPER 01:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Per Majorly, birdy, and Thogo... institutional memory is important and she's been there when really needed. ++Lar: t/c 04:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Per Lar ..--Cometstyles 04:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • COI - I'm also up for confirmation. Been plenty active as far as Wikimedia activities are concerned. She is also obviously trusted by the community and is a good person who I consider a friend. :) --Daniel Mayer (mav) 05:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Confirm. Good work. MBisanz talk 06:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Does excellent work, just not very much of it. I'd prefer to see more activity, but for now I will say keep.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Something between APPER and Thogo. :-/ —DerHexer (Talk) 12:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support to confirm, -jkb- 17:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support to confirm --Serein 20:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Endorse. Keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support to confirm esby 16:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Anthere has given so much to Wikimedia, why not trust her to give a little more if she is willing? —Sean Whitton / 18:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Confirm, of course. — Dan | talk 23:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Confirm I hope to see her more active. --Meno25 23:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support--Jusjih 02:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support---Zyephyrus 21:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove, per blatant inactivity. Get the rights if you need them, give them back if you don't. guillom 11:04, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Woudloper 11:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • support per Majorly, Lar, Sean etc. Thanks for the job you're doing.Finn Rindahl 11:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support --Ahonc 22:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support, per above. Alex Pereira falaê 15:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support and here's hoping to see you more active. Kylu 20:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Per Kylu. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support --Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 10:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support aleichem 11:34, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support ...Aurora... 13:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Vyk 18:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support En passant 19:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Zetud 20:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support not very active, but you never know. In case of a serious problem, we would not need any Steward to take action, but we would need Anthere to take action because she has the legitimacy to do it. Teofilo 22:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Kaganer 17:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep I would like to see Florence as a little bit more active steward. --Millosh 12:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Shizhao 13:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Sebleouf 22:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Alefbe 23:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • keep but I'd like to see more activity this year, now that she's not a chair anymore. --FiliP × 17:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bastique[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: en, fr-3, es-2
  • Información personal: Fui elegido steward en 2006, y aunque no soy tan activo como otros stewards en las actividades generales, debido a mi papel como Coordinador Voluntario en la Fundación, aún siento que tengo algo para ofrecer como steward y creo que todavía soy confiable con las herramientas de steward. Gracias.

Comments about Bastique[edit]

Cspurrier[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, de-2, fr-1
  • Personal info: I have been a steward since Dec 2006. I started grad school this year, which has reduced my activity a good bit. I am still about and I regularly follow the mailing list, and keep an eye out for new requests on wiki (though they are almost always done before I see them, some of the other stewards are doing too good of a job :) ). I expect to be much more active in the next few months and I will always be available for emergencies.

Comments about Cspurrier[edit]

  • Few edits this year, and none since August before you wrote this. Not sure you're active enough to warrant continuing. Majorly talk 00:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Too inactive, I think. --APPER 01:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • see APPER. Marcus Cyron
  • Too inactive for my tastes. Prodego talk 03:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Too inactive, per Majorly. The Helpful One 15:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • COI - I'm also up for confirmation. No actions in the last six months but more than 10 actions in the last year. Not technically inactive per our definition. I think we need to change our definition of inactivity after this election so everybody is aware of what is expected (simply changing and to or would suffice). But any definition change should not be applied retroactively. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 15:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I'm sorry, I don't consider you active enough to continue. Steward tools are meant to be used.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • when he says that he keeps an eye out for requests but they're usually done before he sees them, it seems a little hypocritical to revoke access based on "inactivity" -- I think there's a place for more "inactive" stewards that can serve as backup. Dedicated to the projects. -- phoebe 04:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Imho a bit too inactive, sorry! —DerHexer (Talk) 12:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Inactivity is not a compelling reason to remove stewardship. We do not have a limited number of stewardship positions. Everything else is in order. I see no reason not to reconfirm. JoshuaZ 16:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Inactivity per a number of the above. Tools are for using. --Herby talk thyme 15:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support. The stewards policy considers "inactive" as no steward action in the past 6 months and less than 10 steward actions in the last year. 100 rights' change look fine to me.--Jusjih 02:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove taking on an advanced role means that you are actually willing to do it; your inactivity in stewardship seems to indicate you don't want it; therefore you shouldn't retain it. fr33kman t - c 05:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose Não mantem, as Herbythyme says. Alex Pereira falaê 15:48, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Removenot convincing.--RudolfSimon 21:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Without formal conditions for inactivity, one more year may make a space to see is he really inactive. --Millosh 13:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • remove - inactivity --FiliP × 17:35, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Daniel Mayer (mav)[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, es-2
  • Personal info: I was nominated and elected as one of the original stewards back in 2004. From mid 2004 to mid 2006 I was Wikimedia Chief Financial Officer and helped with the 2007-2008 drive. Because of that, many of my steward actions were related to fundraising drives. After the 2007-2008 drive I took a long - and much needed - wikibreak from Wikimedia activities. Since coming back in November 2008, I have helped comment on requests and set user rights on a sporadic basis due to the inconvenience of editing under one global account and performing steward actions under another. That is now fixed. If confirmed, I promise to maintain a higher level of steward activity.

Comments about Daniel Mayer (mav)[edit]

  • Extremely inactive - you should have handed steward rights back in at the end of 2007, or when you went inactive. I'm not sure based on your activity record you'd be suited to continue. Majorly talk 00:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    NOTE: Inactivity for a Steward is defined as "no steward action in the past 6 months and less than 10 steward actions in the last year." Most of what I've done since coming back from my Wikibreak is comment on requests and be on-call in the IRC channel, which of course is not in the user rights log. I'm back for certain now that my global account is the same as my Steward account. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 01:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Hmm, I'll AGF that you'll be around more this year. Majorly talk 01:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Thank you for assuming good faith that I'm telling the truth and will do what I say. :) --Daniel Mayer (mav) 04:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I'm sorry, I consider you to be inactive despite your showing up a few weeks before the confirmations, and I think you should be removed.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Actually, I came back from my extended Wikibreak in November 2008. Before that, I was busy editing the English Wikipedia - which was surprisingly therapeutic. :) If you like, I will place myself on permanent confirmation and thus be subject to faster recall if my activity drops again --Daniel Mayer (mav) 01:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Just to note that mav and I had a quick conversation about this, and I concluded that my initial "remove" was correct. Thanks  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    And even though I don't agree with you, I don't fault you for taking that stand. Perhaps I should have set the steward flag to my account to null before my Wikibreak. I honestly never thought my break would last as long as it did. But that is the past; I'm back now. Good luck with your own bid to become a Steward. :) --Daniel Mayer (mav) 20:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • see User:Mike.lifeguard. Marcus Cyron
  • Too inactive I think, not everything is defined by that simple definition Prodego talk 03:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Please look at the recent activity, especially in regards to commenting on requests and getting feedback on IRC on those requests. I plan to maintain a similar level of activity going forward. -Daniel Mayer (mav) 04:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I like what I see, and I'm glad you've come back. Institutional memory is another plus. I'd just ask you, if you think you're going to have to drop to completely inactive again, to seriously consider giving up your bit. But on balance I think we'd be worse off without your considerable experience and skills. Keep. ++Lar: t/c 05:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Thank you! I can't make any promises if I'm hit by a bus, but if I go inactive again I will de-steward myself. Besides, I've been around since the first year of Wikipedia and was at one time super active in Wikimedia activities; wild horses could not drag me away from this completely. :) We are really changing the world for the better - who wouldn't want to help make that happen? --Daniel Mayer (mav)
  • Trustworthy, says he'll become more active. Keep. Cbrown1023 talk 15:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Excellent steward, concerns mentioned above do not convince me. — Aitias // discussion 19:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Trustworthy, hasn't broken the wiki. If he says he'll be more active in the future, let's let him. NuclearWarfare 20:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Confirm, of course. — Dan | talk 01:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Per mav, keep. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • He says he will be more active in the future, and has not given any indication in the past that he s anything but suitable and trustworthy. I am more than willing to extend the benefit of the doubt and trust that he means what he says and will follow through. -- Avi 15:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support. The stewards policy considers "inactive" as no steward action in the past 6 months and less than 10 steward actions in the last year. 170 rights' change look fine to me.--Jusjih 02:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support renewed activity, willingness to serve, and more than qualified. Please stay. bastique demandez! 19:00, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep, per above and renewed recent activity. Kylu 03:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Fine, states will be more active and thus is deserving of our continued support fr33kman t - c 04:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support retention. MBisanz talk 04:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep - trustworthy and experienced stewards should not be removed because of inactivity, once their intention is to become active again. Woudloper 11:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support, have a great experience. Alex Pereira falaê 15:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Inactivity is indeed a concern, but when a user with great experience who has proven himself trustworthy and competent wants to continue contributing as steward, I say keep and thanks for volunteering. Regards, Finn Rindahl 20:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support, per Lar. Alefbe 03:54, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support -- per bastique :) phoebe 05:56, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Per Cbrown1023. --Millosh 13:04, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Shizhao 13:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • keep + get more active in the following period. --FiliP × 17:36, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Darkoneko[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: fr, en-3
  • Información personal: Darkoneko, 27 años, burócrata en Frwiki. Como steward, a veces hago una tontería o dos, pero globalmente, pienso no hacer demasiado mal mi trabajo.

Comments about Darkoneko[edit]

  • Everyone makes mistakes - you're plenty active for me and do a good job :) Majorly talk 00:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Darkoneko seems to be doing fine. --Kanonkas 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Doing a good job as a steward, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • You're always there to help, thank you. --Thogo (talk) 01:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Active and competent; I see not issues here.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Darko is doing a good job Prodego talk 03:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Darko is doing an excellent job, keep up the good work *me pats kitty* ..--Cometstyles 03:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Yep. ++Lar: t/c 04:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Despite being a cat, does very good steward and bot work. /me caresse Darkoneko.--Shanel 04:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Excellent job. − Elfix × talk (fr) 10:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Good job, excellent steward :)--Nick1915 - all you want 13:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Useful, thanks --Herby talk thyme 15:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Always here to help and he make a very good job ! --Garfieldairlines 15:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Confirm, he is doing a good job. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 15:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Merci pour ton excellent travail de steward quotidien. Vyk 18:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • He does good work. miranda 00:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Confirm. I have some misgivings due to this incident but as others point out above mistakes happen. My other interactions with Darkoneko have been positive. WJBscribe (talk) 01:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Very nice and helpful person! Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support to confirm, -jkb- 14:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support thanks for your useful SWMT work. --Nemo 18:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support to confirm --Serein 20:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Endorse. Keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I am inclined to support, as you do a lot of good work, however I would appreciate it if you could please explain why you have been using steward tools for your home wiki (fr.wiki) such as doing a Checkuser and desysoping accounts? Also I am concerned that you sysopped user:Pmartin on frwikisource when they have very active crats and sysops, and Pmartin only has 11 edits on that project. Pmartin previously raised a discussion at their discussion board, and it would have been more appropriate for the user to alert the community of the problem again, rather than it be fixed[5] and noted after the event[6]. John Vandenberg 04:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Hello
    • The few checkusers I did were either due to emergency (large scale vandalism and no regular checkuser online) or cross wiki ones (several wiki, which make asking the local CUs of every of them very tiedous). I tend to avoid the later whenever possible.
    • About the desysoping, Stewards_policy#Avoid_conflicts_of_interest states that it is not a problem when it's a clear cut case (self request from aoineko last july) or emergency (sebleouf, last november), tho it's not too recommmended. Since it seems to raise a few concerns, I'll avoid doing so from now on.
    • PMartin is the founder of Linterweb, the company that made the search engine Wikiwix. He had previously been given global editinterface to maintain the javascript that point to that search engine. I must admit that I am not used of creating/affecting global groups, so giving him a very temporary sysop right so he could correct the bug seemed the best solution back then. Also, you have probably noticed he was given back that global right by another steward., some hours after I gave him the temp sysop.
    DarkoNeko 13:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • support. esby 16:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support. /me likes cats. And seriously, he's doing the job fine. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 19:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Confirm. — Dan | talk 00:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support.--Jusjih 03:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support--Zyephyrus 21:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • support Thanks for the job you're doing. Finn Rindahl 11:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support--Sadik Khalid 16:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • ça va sans dire--Vituzzu 11:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support, per above. Alex Pereira falaê 15:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Good kitty. :) Kylu 20:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support About the «Sebleouf case», I'm glad DarkoNeko took upon himself to promptly de-sysop as soon as concerns arose about this account being possibly compromised. We need available and reactive stewards on the major projects. --JY Rehby 04:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose I don't rate him. See bellow, about Wikiwix. -- Perky 14:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support le vieux chat noir --P@d@w@ne 15:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove --Guil2027 15:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Toujours fidèle aux chats =) — EvpØk Ma c'haozeadennoù 17:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support En passant 19:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Esprit fort médiocre, personalité minimale (et d'ordinaire, de Minimis non curo), courtisan caractériel, donc parfaitement adapté au fauteuil de la fonction ; pourtant, je suis au regret de strong Oppose Oppose, hélas ! --Budelberger 20:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC) ().Reply[reply]
    Translation: "Spirit quite mediocre, minimal personality (and normally, of trivial things I care not), courtier of difficult character, and thus perfectly adapted to the armchair of this position; nonetheless, I regret to strong Oppose, alas!" —translated by Pathoschild.
    Ce qu'il y a de bien avec les esprits simples, voire simplistes, c'est qu'ils sont d'Éminence prévisibles, et enfantins : à peine levés, ils poussent leur petit caca. --Budelberger 14:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC) ().Reply[reply]
    Translation: "What's nice about simple (even simplistic) spirits, is that they are eminently predictable, and childish: barely awoken, they pop out their little poopoo." —translated by Pathoschild.
    Note : Budelberger has since been banned from meta for "constant trolling". It's his latest ban in a long serie, as he was previously banned on many wikipedia for similar reasons (including harassing people he don't like on their local bot flag request). DarkoNeko 22:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Moez talk 23:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose I disagree with your support of Wikiwix. This is an outside company having nothing to do with wikimedia. Teofilo 02:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Sorry, I don't understand what that has to do with Darkoneko's being a steward.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:51, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support. Of course support. Blinking Spirit 19:18, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Strong support, efficient, friendly and helpful. Clem23 21:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • You are more active as a steward than as a bureaucrat on French wiki! If you often forget to process French wiki task, I Oppose Oppose you. but if not, I Support Support you to be a steward.--Kwj2772 (論) 03:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Well, frwiki has 4 others active stewards, so each of us hasn't that many things to do, apart discussing bordeline admin elections. DarkoNeko 22:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I wanted to say "Care your project also" via literary expression. I'm sorry for you to understand too directly. You had good jobs!--Kwj2772 (論) 02:08, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Active steward. --Millosh 13:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Very good steward. Sebleouf 21:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • keep - we need a cat. --FiliP × 17:37, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Same reason as above. ;p Diti (talk to the penguin) 22:07, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dbl2010[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: tr, en-3, de-2, az-2, tk-1, uz-1
  • Personal info: statement here

Comments about Dbl2010[edit]

DerHexer[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

español:

Comments about DerHexer[edit]

The following discussion is closed: Confirmed. Nihil Obstat Effeietsanders 02:03, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Drini[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: es, en-5
  • Información personal: Me conocen, soy biblio en 6 o 7 wikis (perdí la cuenta), checkuser en 3 y wikimedista desde hace 5 años. Los que trabajan en varias wikis saben que mi labor reciente ha sido lidiar con bots vandálicos. Esta es mi segunda confirmación y aprecio cualquier comentario o sugerencia sobre mi labor como steward.

Comments about Drini[edit]

And sir, oh please explain me the high moral ground on canvassing? [7] [8] [9] es:Drini 21:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ad hominem attacks only serve to highlight your lack of suitability for the position. These users have a unique knowledge of your actions. Would you expect me to open a Request for comment on your actions and link to it here? Exactly what would you say was the ideal way to let people know about abusive behavior and the forum to comment on it? Perhaps leave a messgage on every user´s page on all the projects? Notifying three people of this election without suggesting what they say is hardly canvassing. I believe my friendly notification falls under [[10]]. It was sent to three people(limited number) and neutrally worded. Please explain how this is a violation of WP:CANVASS or is this another mendacious twisting of something that you cannot not know is not canvassing. If you do not understand the policy on canvassing to correctly identify it, then I realy question on more grounds you ability to serve as a steward.Die4Dixie 22:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
None of this has anything to do with stewardship. Drini is probably one of the best stewards we've ever had. You're essentially saying you're opposing him continuing his good work because he blocked you. Canvassing to people to get them to attempt to come and sabotage this discussion in your favour hasn't helped you one bit either. Please consider your future actions more carefully. Thanks, Majorly talk 22:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
(edit conflict)I'm not familiar with meta-wiki or non-English projects but I seriously doubt Die4Dixie's incident is going to overturn anybody's candidacy for anything - the other comments are universally in support. Thus, I suggest all parties keep some decorum here and not get into wiki-arguing. I think the handling of Die4Dixie's block on English Wikipedia was unfortunate (a block for reasons poorly stated and seemingly mistaken, possibly not as a neutral party, followed by being unavailable for a day). Also, even though as Majorly points out Stewardship is very different than adminship, because of the increased authority it should be even more important that one keep a calm head, not play favorites, not get into grudges or matches with individual editors, etc. It is normal that the target of a block will be upset and make accusations, reasonable ones and otherwise, and perhaps even speak out of turn. Turning the other cheek and dealing with that in a firm but dignified way so that the blocked party can, hopefully, cool down and rejoin the editing process is also part of the job of administering blocks. The strong protest against alleged canvassing seems defensive, and piling on. Having said all that, and with all due respect to D4D and his (in my opinion) reasonable upset, I don't see this as anything to disqualify a candidate. No lasting harm done on either side, so please let it go. Wikidemon 23:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Btw sometimes Drini you yourself are soft with canvassing, so we're all to blame anyway--Vituzzu 20:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Per Die4Dixie, if you're going to canvass I'll make it work backwards Alexfusco5 23:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Without Pedro, we would need 10 more hard working stewards to replace him :) --Millosh 13:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Shizhao 13:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • keep --FiliP × 17:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove I don't question his vandal fighting work, but he lacks experience in conflict resolution. Without entering into detail about my personal case, Drini has refused to mediate after my request, 1 and defended the actions of the other party involved, 2. I hope that my posting will catch the attention of another Spanish speaking steward, any help is welcome. Thanks, --J.Mundo 19:02, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • May I just bring to your kind attention that steward's role is not meant as "super-administrator"; a Steward is not a sort of mediator, nor decides but always conforms to the relevant policies. Thank you for reading. --M/ 19:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dungodung[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: sr, en-4, de-1, hr-4, bs-4, mk-1
  • Personal info: Well, I've been a steward for a year now. A quite active one, at that. Not much has changed since I was elected. My statement from roughly a year ago pretty much sums it all. Moreover, I enjoyed serving the community as a steward and hope to be able to keep contributing in the following period.

Comments about Dungodung[edit]

  • Keep definitely! Majorly talk 00:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Slightly active in the SWMT-area, and doing a good job as a steward, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Doing a good job, and you are active. No concerns here. --Kanonkas 00:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • You are doing a great job, thank you! --Thogo (talk) 01:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep. miranda 21:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Dungodung is active and does excellent work overall; keep.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep - per Mike ..--Cometstyles 02:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Also a good steward. Prodego talk 03:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Always there on IRC when I need advice, sage counsel on stewards-l. ++Lar: t/c 04:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Active steward and father of StewardBot.--Shanel 04:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Confirm. Good work. MBisanz talk 06:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Essential... --Nick1915 - all you want 13:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Definite keep. Stifle 14:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Confirm, he is always helping —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 16:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support -- Mercy (☎|✍) 16:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep per Majorly. Razorflame 21:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • You're even more available than me. ;) Very active, very helpful person. Nick's "essential" seems to be adequate. :) Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support to confirm, -jkb- 14:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Coimeád - yup! - Alison ❤ 19:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Very helpful and active. John Vandenberg 03:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Endorse. Keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Fine with me, thanks --Herby talk thyme 15:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Quality Wikimedian, good experience and level-headedness. —Sean Whitton / 18:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Confirm. — Dan | talk 00:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • useful fellow. DarkoNeko 00:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support.--Jusjih 03:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support---Zyephyrus 21:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose -- I didn't had intention to vote here. As things are wright now, my vote won't change the outcome of this voting. But, this edit [11] of Dungodung made me change my mind and to react, to inform others about few things. Calling an user as "major troll", just like that, is below the level of a person that is a candidate for a steward. Does he know the meaning of the word "troll"? Has Dungodung ever read the rule WP:ETIQUETTE? How can he be sure that his message [12] wasn't a kind of trolling (provoking another user's response by posting provocative messages; see wictionary: troll: A person who posts to a ... in a way intended to anger other posters... )? That message of Dungodung was unecessary. Ordinary pouring of oil on the fire. Something else was "on the table"; why had he wrote something that could distract the discussion? Why hasn't he used the word "user who is unnecessarily too cautious"? Dungodung, here're my contributions on meta [13]. You can see my voting pattern. Are you so superficial that you haven't seen that? I cannot believe it. Or your pride is so hurted by having a vote against you 2 years ago (98 "yes" and 2 "oppose")? We don't have to have acclamatory elections. Giving powers to a user is a serious thing. Taking them away is much harder thing. If a user mentions unpleasant questions and "kills the acclamation mood on the party", that doesn't make that user a troll. To make things worse, you've added [14] "major troll, who is constantly trying to obstruct the procedures"??? Do you know the meaning of the word "obstruct"? And after all these personal attacks (what about policy WP:NPA?), Dungodung continues with [15] " I cannot really judge, seeing as I'm not in the community". Then why is he messing (and throwing mud on other user) into something that he cannot really judge, as he personally admitted? What does this mean [16] "Kubura's obsessions and phobiae shouldn't be solved in this manner". Dungodung, you're a steward, bureaucrat, admin. You've forgotten how is to be the ordinary user. You don't know how it feels when a user with undeserved wiki-powers (admin, bureaucrat etc.), a user that's not eligible for those powers, makes an idiot of you and whole community. And you cannot do a damn thing, since that uneligible user is protracting any procedure (in criticism of his/hers work or a removal attempt) by tedious, foggy, "play dumb" arguments. Kubura 17:55, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Thank you for your vote opinion. --FiliP × 18:58, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support, Keep forever! One of the best, always ready to help. Exelent job Filip!--Laslovarga 13:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Dolledre 03:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support call him an oger next time, perhaps he likes that better than "troll". Woudloper 11:21, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • support Thanks for the job you're doing. Finn Rindahl 12:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support--Sadik Khalid 16:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Absolutely not. Unbelievably bad check on a solid user. Synergy 21:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    One problematic check out of how many? Majorly talk 22:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Thanks for the opinion, but I'm not sure I understand your reasoning here. Do you find that my "inconclusive" results are not valid? You know, this was discussed among other stewards; I just did the check. --FiliP × 22:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Majorly: yes, this is the problem. An experienced CU would never have done a check on such poor evidence (unless I have it completely backwards and switching my identity = sockpuppet), and as such I don't think you can be trusted Dungodung. Frankly, all the stewards could have been there "talking" but at the end of the day, you ran the check, not them. Synergy 22:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Actually, I think an experienced CU probably would have. DarkoNeko 01:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Concur with DarkoNeko, any of the stewards would have taken this on. This opposition is absurd. bastique demandez! 19:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I really don't know enough details of this, but seriously, I can't imagine that any steward would run a checkuser on evidence like this without some additional information. What additional evidence did you guys look at before you ran the check? NuclearWarfare 23:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Reaffirming the fact that I think the steward body as a whole (at least those that were active) did not research enough before running a checkuser. NuclearWarfare 06:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    See above. Opposing Dungodung on what any steward would have done is absurd. bastique demandez! 19:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Bastique, I would be fine with Dungodung retaining stewardship. But there is no other place to really register my dislike for the checkuser, so I must do so here. If only those IRC chatmasks and logs were used as the basis for running the CU, I think we need a reexamination of our checkuser policies. NuclearWarfare 00:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support, active. Alex Pereira falaê 15:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove. In April 2008, Dungodung checked my FaWiki ID with another user and an IP, just based on a baseless request by user:Mardetanha (see [17] for details). I had almost forgotten that incident, until I saw the comment by Synergy. It seems to me that these two examples show a pattern, rather than a sporadic non-important error. Alefbe 19:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Yay, another troll. Thanks for the opinion. --FiliP × 19:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I believe this is a clear example of personal attack. Alefbe 19:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support, The incidents don't outweigh Dungodung's positive contributions. Kylu 20:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support ...Aurora... 13:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support Support Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]