Global sysops/Vote

Global sysops (Vote)

العربية:

(ساعدنا في ترجمة هذه الرسالة)

جميع أعضاء مجتمعات ويكيميديا والذين يحققون المعايير التالية مدعوون للتصويت على مقترح المشرفين العامين:

• لدية أكثر من 150 إضافة في مشروع واحد على الأقل
• قد قام بالتسجيل قبل أكثر من ثلاثة أشهر على الأقل

وسيستمر التصويت من الساعة 00:00 1 يناير 2010 (ت.ع.م) حتى 23:59 31 يناير 2010 (ت.ع.م), وبعد وقت محدد سيتم استعراض النتائج وتطبيقها.

مصرى:

( ساعدنا فى ترجمة الرساله دى)
مشروع فكرة السيسوب العام "Global Sysops". هنا]

و تم فتح التصويت على الفكره و ينتهى التصويت فى 31 يناير.

جميع أعضاء مجتمعات ويكيميديا و اللى يحققون الشروط دى مدعوين للتصويت على مقترح السيسوب العام:

• يكون ليك حساب مسجل
• يكون ليك 150 تعديل فى مشروع ويكيبيديا واحد على الأقل
• يكون مر على تاريخ تسجيلك تلات شهور على الأقل

و هايستمر التصويت من الساعة 00:00 1 يناير 2010 (ت.ع.م) حتى 23:59 31 يناير 2010 (ت.ع.م), وبعد وقت محدد هاتتعرض نتايج التصويت و تتطبق.

Беларуская:

(дапамажыце перакласьці гэтае паведамленьне)

Усе сябры супольнасьці Wikimedia, якія адпавядаюць наступным крытэрам, запрашаюцца да галасаваньня наконт кандыдатаў у глябальныя адміністратары:

• 150 правак прынамсі ў адным з праектаў
• 3 месяцы з даты рэгістрацыі

Галасаваньне трывае з 00:00 1 студзеня 2010 (UTC) да 23:59 31 студзеня 2010 (UTC), пасьля чаго будуць прынятыя і абвешчаныя вынікі.

Български:

(помогнете ни да преведем това съобщение)

Всички членове на обществото Уикимедия, които отговарят на следните критерии, са поканени да гласуват в предложението за глобални сис-опове:

• Трябва да имат регистриран акаунт (регистрация)
• 150 редакции върху поне един проект
• Поне 3 месеца регистрация

Вотът ще тече от 00:00, 1 Януари 2010 (UTC) до 23:59, 31 Януари 2010 (UTC), след което ще се проведе безпристрастен очерк и резултатите от вота ще влязат в сила.

Bosanski:

(Pomozite nam sa prevodom ove poruke!)

Svi članovi Wikimedija zajednice, koji ispunjavaju navedene kriterije, su pozvani da daju svoj glas na glasanju o uvođenju grupe globalnih administratora:

• 150 izmjena na najmanje jednom projektu
• najmanje 3 mjeseca prijavljen

Glasanje traje od 1. januara 2010. u 00:00 sati (UTC) do 31. januara 2010. u 23:59 sati (UTC). Poslije glasanja, rezultate će objaviti jedna neutralna osoba.

Català :

(ajudeu a traduir aquest missatge)

Tots els membres de la comunitat de Wikimedia que compleixin tots els criteris que segueixen a continuació estan invitats a votar la proposta sobre administradors globals:

• Estar registrat
• Haver fet 150 edicions en almenys un projecte
• Haver-se registrat fa més de 3 mesos

La votació tindrà lloc des de les 00:00 de l'1 de gener de 2010 (UTC) fins les 23:59 del 31 de gener del 2010 (UTC), i serà seguida d'una revisió independent per a determinar el resultat.

کوردی:

( هاوکاریمان بکە لە وەرگێڕانی ئەم پەیامەدا)

هەموو ئەندامێکی دامەزراوەی ویکیمیدیا کە ئەم مەرجانەی خوارەوەی تێدابێت، بانگهێشتکراوە بۆ دەنگدان لەسەر ئەم پرۆژەئامادەکراوە global sysops :

• پێویستە هەژمارێکی خۆی هەبێت
• لانی کەم لەیەکێک لە پرۆژەکانی ویکیمیدیادا ١٥٠ بەشداری هەبێت
• ٣ مانگ تێپەڕیبیت بەسەر ئەندامەتییەکەیدا

ئەم دەنگدانە لە ڕێکەوتی ١.١.٢٠١٠ - کاتژمێر ٠٠:٠٠ بەکاتی گشتی بەردەوامە تاکوو ٣١.١.٢٠١٠ کاتژمێر ١٢:٠٠ شەو بەکاتی گشتی، پاش کۆتایی دەنگدان کەسێکی سەربەخۆ دەنگەکان دەژمێرێت و ئەنجامەکەی ئاشکرا دەکات.

Čeština:

(help us translate this message)

Všichni členové komunity Wikimedia, kteří splňují následující kritéria, jsou zváni k hlasování o zavedení uživatelské skupiny globální správci:

• Uživatel musí být registrovaný
• Musí být registrovaný 3 měsíce a déle
• Na jednom z projektů Wikimedia musí mít 150 editací a více

Volby startují 1. ledna v 00:00 (UTC) a budou trvat do 31. ledna do 23:59 (UTC), poté proběhne nezávislé vyhodnocení a výsledky vejdou v platnost.

Dansk:

(Hjælp os med at oversætte denne besked)

Alle medlemmer af Wikimedia-fællesskabet, som opfylder de følgende kriterier er inviteret til at stemme om forslaget globale administratorer:

• Skal have en registreret konto
• 150 redigeringer på mindst et projekt
• 3 måneders registrering

Afstemningen vil blive afviklet fra kl. 00:00, den 1. januar 2010 (UTC) indtil kl. 23:59, den 31. januar 2010 (UTC), hvorefter en upartisk gennemgang udføres, som vedtager resultaterne.

Deutsch:

(Hilf uns bei der Übersetzung dieser Nachricht!)

Alle Mitglieder der Wikimedia-Gemeinschaft, die folgende Kriterien erfüllen, sind eingeladen, an der Abstimmung zur Einführung der Benutzergruppe globaler Administrator teilzunehmen:

• 150 Edits in mindestens einem Projekt
• mindestens 3 Monate registriert

Die Abstimmung läuft vom 1. Januar 2010 um 00:00 Uhr (UTC) bis zum 31. Januar 2010 um 23:59 Uhr (UTC). Nach der Abstimmung wird von einer neutralen Person das Ergebnis bekannt gegeben.

Dolnoserbski:

(Pomagaj nam toś tu powěźeńku pśedłožyś)

Wše cłonki Wikimedijowego zgromaźeństwa, kótarež docynjaju wšykne slědujuce kriterije su pśepšosone na wótgłosowanje wó naraźenju ku globalnym administratoram:

• Musyš měś zregistrěrowane konto wót 3 mjasecow
• 150 změnow na nanejmjenjej jadnem projekśe

Wótgłoswanje běžy wót 1. januara 2010 00:00 goź. (UTC) do 31.januara 2010 23:59 goź. (UTC). Pótom neutralny wužywaŕ pśeglědajo a dajo wuslědki k wěsći.

Ελληνικά:

(βοηθήστε μας να μεταφράσουμε αυτό το μήνυμα)

Όλα τα μέλη της κοινότητας του Wikimedia που καλύπτουν τα ακόλουθα κριτήρια προσκαλούνται να ψηφίσουν την πρόταση για global sysops:

• 150 επεξεργασίες σε τουλάχιστον ένα εγχείρημα
• 3 μήνες εγγεγραμμένος

Η ψηφοφορία θα διαρκέσει από 00:00, 1 Ιανουάριος 2010 (UTC) έως 23:59, 31 Ιανουάριος 2010 (UTC), μετά την οποία θα γίνει μια μη-φατριαστική αποτίμηση και θα ανακοινωθούν τα αποτελέσματα.

English:

(help us translate this message)

All members of the Wikimedia community who meet all of the following criteria are invited to vote on the global sysops proposal:

• Must have had a registered account for at least 3 months
• 150 edits on at least one project

The vote will run from 00:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC) to 23:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC), after which time a non-partisan review will be undertaken and the results enacted.

Esperanto:

(Helpo pri la traduko de tiu noto!)

Ĉiuj membroj de la vikimedia komunumo, kiuj plenumas la sekvajn kriteriojn, invitiĝas partopreni en baloto pri la enkonduko de la vikipediista rajto globala administranto:

• 150 redaktoj en almenaŭ unu projekto
• registriĝo ekde almenaŭ 3 monatoj

La baloto daŭras de la 1-a de januaro 2010 00:00 h (UTC) ĝis la 31-a de januaro 2010 23:59 h (UTC). Post la baloto la rezulto anonciĝos fare de neŭtrala persono.

Español :

(ayúdenos con la traducción de este mensaje)

Todos los miembros de la comunidad Wikimedia que cumplan los siguientes requisitos están invitados a votar en la propuesta de administradores globales:

• Tener una cuenta registrada
• 150 ediciones en al menos un proyecto
• 3 meses de antigüedad de registro

La votación comenzará el día 1 de enero de 2010 a las 00:00 horas (UTC) y finalizará el día 31 de enero de 2010 a las 23:59 horas (UTC), a partir de ese momento comenzará un estudio independiente de los votos para determinar el resultado.

Euskara:

(Lagun gaitzazu mezu honen itzulpenarekin)

Ondorengo baldintzak betetzen dituzten Wikimedia komunitateko kide guztiak gonbidatuak daude administratzaile globalen inguruko bozketara:

• Gutxienez 150 aldaketa proiektu batean
• 3 hilabete baino denbora gehiago izatea proiektuan

Bozketa 2010 urtarrilaren 1eko 00:00etan (UTC) hasiko da eta 2010eko urtarrilaren 31eko 23:59etan (UTC) amaituko dam une horretatik aurrera bozken ikaste independentea egingo emaitza determinatzeko.

فارسی:

(به ما در ترجمه این متن کمک کنید)
از تمامی اعضای انجمن ویکی‌مدیا که دارای شرایط زیر هستند دعوت می‌شود تا در رای گیری برای طرح پیشنهادی: راهبرسراسری سیستم شرکت کنند:

• کاربر تایید شده باشد
• حداقل 150 ویرایش در یکی از پروژه‌ها داشته باشد
• 3 ماه از زمان ثبت نام او گذشته باشد

رای‌گیری از یکم ژانویه 2010 ساعت 00:00 آغاز خواهد شد و در 31 ژانویه 2010 ساعت 23:59 به پایان خواهد رسید.نظر سنجی‌هایی که پس از پایان زمان مقرر ثبت شوند بی تاثیر خواهند بود.

Suomi:

(auta meitä kääntämään tämä viesti)

Kaikki seuraavat kriteerit täyttävät Wikimedia-yhteisön jäsenet kutsutaan äänestämään globaaleja ylläpitäjiä koskevasta ehdotuksesta:

• ainakin 150 muokkausta vähintään yhdessä hankkeessa
• tunnuksen rekisteröimisestä kulunut vähintään 3 kuukautta

Äänestys pidetään 1. tammikuuta 2010 kello 00:00 (UTC) – 31. tammikuuta 2010 kello 23:59 (UTC), minkä jälkeen suoritetaan puolueeton äänestyksen arviointi ja tulokset pannaan täytäntöön.

Français :

(Aidez nous a traduire ce message)

Tous les membres de la communauté Wikimedia ayant atteint les critères suivants sont invités à voter sur la proposition des administrateurs globaux :

• 150 modifications sur un projet
• Enregistré depuis plus de 3 mois

Le vote est ouvert du 1 janvier 2010 00:00 (UTC) au 31 janvier 2010 23:59 (UTC), après un décompte impartial sera effectué, et les résultats annoncés.

Frysk:

(Help ús dit berjocht oer te setten)

Eltsenien yn de Wikimedia-mienskip dy't foldocht oan de folgjende easken wurdt útnoege om te stimmen oer it foarstel foar globale behearders:

• Jo moatte in brûkersnamme hawwe,
• dêrmei op syn minst 150 bewurkingen op op syn minst ien projekt dien hawwe,
• en trije moanne as dy brûker registrearre wêze.

De stimming rint fan 1 jannewaris 2010 01:00 (CET) oant 31 jannewaris 2010 00:59 (CET), wêrnei't de risseltaten ûnpartidich beskôge en útfurdige wurde sille.

Galego:

(axúdanos a traducir esta mensaxe)

Todos os membros da comunidade da Wikimedia que reúnan os seguintes requirimentos están convidados a participar na votación de administradores globais:

• 150 edicións en, polo menos, un proxecto
• Rexistro desde hai, polo menos, 3 meses

A votación irá desde as 00:00 do 1 de xaneiro de 2010 (UTC) ata as 23:59 do 31 de xaneiro de 2010 (UTC); despois, farase un escrutinio imparcial e publicaranse os resultados.

Alemannisch :

(Hilf is bi dr Ibersetzig vu däre Nochricht!)

Alli Mitglider vu dr Wikimedia-Gmeinschaft, wu die Kriterie erfille, sin yyglade, mitzmache an dr Abstimmig fir d Yyfierig vu dr Benutzergruppe globale Ammann:

• 150 Edit in zmindescht eim Projäkt
• zmindescht 3 Monate regischtriert

D Abstimmig lauft vum 1. Jänner 2010 am 00:00 Uhr (UTC) bis zum 31. Jänner 2010 am 23:59 Uhr (UTC). No dr Abstimmig wird vun ere neutrale Person s Ergebnis bekannt gee.

עברית:

(סייעו לנו לתרגם הודעה זו)

כל חברי קהילת ויקימדיה אשר עומדים בקריטריונים להלן מוזמנים להצביע על ההצעה למנות מפעילי מערכת גלובליים:

• בעלי חשבון משתמש
• לפחות 150 עריכות באחד המיזמים
• בעלי ותק של שלושה חודשים כמשתמשים רשומים

ההצבעה תימשך מ-00:00, 1 בינואר 2010 (UTC) עד 23:59, 31 בינואר 2010 (UTC), אז תבוצע הערכה של התוצאות וההחלטה תיכנס לתוקף.

Hrvatski:

(Pomozite nam prevesti ovu poruku!)

Pozivaju se svi članovi zajednice Wikimedija koji udovoljavaju idućim kriterijima neka glasuju o prijedlogu uvođenja globalnih administratora:

• 150 uređivanja na najmanje jednom projektu
• najmanje 3 mjeseca prijavljeni

Glasovanje traje od 1. siječnja 2010. u 00:00 (UTC) do 31. siječnja 2010. u 23:59 (UTC). Nakon glasovanja neutralna osoba pregledat će glasove da bi se utvrdio konačni rezultat glasovanja.

Hornjoserbsce:

(Pomhaj nam tutu zdźělenku předłožić)

Wšitcy čłonojo Wikimedijoweho zhromadźenstwa, kotřiž spjelnjeja slědowace kriterije, su přeprošene na wothłosowanje wo namjeće ke globalnym administratoram:

• Dyrbiš zregistrowane konto wot 3 měsacow měć
• 150 změnow na znajmjeńša jadnym projekće

Wóthłoswanje běži wot 1. januara 2010 00:00 hodź. (UTC) do 31.januara 2010 23:59 hodź. (UTC). Potom neutralny wužiwar budźe wuslědki přepruwować a wozjewjeć.

Magyar:

(Kérjük, segíts más nyelvekre is lefordítani ezt a szöveget!)

Ez a szavazás a globális adminisztrátori jogosultság bevezetése felől hivatott dönteni. Minden szerkesztő – legyen az bármely Wikimédia társoldalról való – jogosult szavazni, ha:

• van felhasználói fiókja, és
• ehhez kapcsolódóan legalább 150 szerkesztése legalább 1 társoldalon, és
• a regisztrációja 3 hónapnál régebbi.

A szavazás kezdete: 2010. január 1. 0:00; vége: 2010. január 31. 23:59. Az összesítést független (a szavazáson részt nem vett) szerkesztők végzik majd.

Interlingua:

(adjuta nos a traducer iste message)

Tote le membros del communitate Wikimedia que satisface tote le sequente criterios es invitate a votar super le proposition de administratores global:

• Debe posseder un conto registrate
• 150 modificationes in al minus un projecto
• 3 menses de registration

Le voto essera aperte de 00:00, le 1 de januario 2010 (UTC) a 23:59, le 31 de januario 2010 (UTC). Postea un revision impartial essera interprendite e le resultatos promulgate.

Bahasa Indonesia:

Semua anggota komunitas Wikimedia yang memenuhi syarat berikut diundang untuk memberikan suara di proposal global sysops:

• Telah membuat 150 suntingan setidaknya pada satu proyek, dan
• Telah terdaftar minimal 3 (tiga) bulan.

Pemungutan suara akan dilaksanakan dari pukul 00.00, 1 Januari 2010 (UTC) hingga pukul 23.59, 31 Januari 2010 (UTC). Setelah 31 Januari tersebut, semua orang ternasuk yang tidak berhak suara, dapat melihat hasil akhir pemungutan. Hasil tersebut dapat dipertangungjawabkan dan akan ditetapkan.

Italiano:

(aiutarci a tradurre questo messaggio)

Tutti i membri della comunità di Wikimedia che soddisfano i criteri seguenti sono invitati a votare la proposta per gli amministratori globali:

• 150 modifiche su almeno un progetto
• 3 mesi di registrazione

La votazione si svolgerà dalle 00:00 del 1 gennaio 2010 (UTC) alle ore 23:59 del 31 gennaio 2010 (UTC), dopo di che sarà presa una decisione imparziale e il risultato verrà messo in atto.

日本語：

(このメッセージの翻訳を手伝ってください)

以下の基準を満たすウィキメディア利用者は、グローバル管理者の提案についての投票に参加してください:

• ログインユーザーであること
• 少なくとも一つのプロジェクトにおいて150編集以上
• アカウント登録後、3か月以上

投票は、2010年1月1日00:00(UTC)から2010年1月31日23:59(UTC)まで行われます。投票終了後、無党派（non-partisan）による投票チェックが行われ、結果が確定します。

ភាសាខ្មែរ៖

(សូមជួយបកប្រែសារនេះ)

សមាជិកគ្រប់រូបរបស់សហគមន៍វិគីមេឌាដែលបំពេញលក្ខខណ្ឌខាងក្រោមត្រូបានអញ្ជើញអោយចូលរួមបោះឆ្នោតនៅក្នុងសំនើសេវាភិបាលសកល៖

• អ្នកត្រូវតែមានគណនីចុះឈ្មោះរួចរាល់ហើយយ៉ាងតិច៣ខែ
• មានកំណែប្រែយ៉ាងតិច១៥០នៅលើគម្រោងមួយ

ការបោះឆ្នោតនឹងប្រព្រឹត្តទៅចាប់ពីម៉ោង ០០:០០ ថ្ងៃទី១ មករា ២០១០ (UTC) ដល់ម៉ោង ២៣:៥៩ ថ្ងៃទី៣១ មករា ២០១០ (UTC)។ បន្ទាប់ពីនោះបុគ្គលកអព្យាក្រិតនឹងធ្វើការត្រួតពិនិត្យរាប់សំលេងឆ្នោតនិងប្រកាសលទ្ធផល។

한국어:

(번역을 도와주세요!)

다음 조건을 만족하는 위키미디어 프로젝트의 모든 참여자들은 글로벌 관리자의 도입 제안에 대한 투표에 참여할 수 있습니다.

• 적어도 1개의 프로젝트에서 편집 횟수가 150회 이상
• 계정 등록 이후 3개월이 지나야 함

이 투표는 2010년 1월 1일 00:00 (UTC)에서 2010년 1월 31일 23:59 (UTC)까지 열립니다. 그 후에 적절한 의견을 종합하여 결과를 발표할 것입니다.

Македонски:

(помогнете ни да ја преведеме оваа порака)

Сите членови на заедницата на Викимедија кои ги задоволуваат сите долунаведени критериуми се повикуваат да гласаат по предлогот за глобални администратори:

• Регистрирана сметка веќе 3 месеци
• 150 уредувања на барем еден проект

Гласањето ќе трае од 00:00, 1 јануари 2010 (UTC) до 23:59, 31 јануари 2010 (UTC). Потоа ќе се изврши независен преглед и пребројување, и резултатите ќе бидат објавени.

Bahasa Melayu:

(Bantu kami menterjemah pesanan ini)

Semua ahli komuniti Wikimedia yang memenuhi semua kriteria berikut dijemput untuk mengundi cadangan penyelia sejagat:

• Mempunyai akaun berdaftar
• 150 suntingan di satu projek
• 3 bulan berdaftar

Undian bermula pada 00:00, 1 Januari 2010 (UTC) hingga 23:59, 31 Januari 2010 (UTC). Selepas itu kajian tak berpihak akan diadakan dan keputusannya dijalankan.

Nederlands:

(Help vertalen)

Alle gebruikers van Wikimedia projecten worden uitgenodigd te stemmen over het voorstel voor globale moderatoren, mits men voldoet aan:

• minimaal 150 bewerkingen op minimaal één project
• minimaal 3 maanden voor aanvang van de stemming geregistreerd

De stemming is open van 1 januari 2010 1:00 (CET) tot 31 januari 2010 0:59 (CET), daarna zal de uitslag door een neutraal persoon bekend worden gemaakt.

Occitan :

(Ajudatz-nos a traduire aqueste messatge)

Totes los membres de la comunautat Wikimedia qu'an atench los critèris seguents son convidats a votar per la proposicion dels administrators globals

• 150 modificacions sus un projècte
• Enregistrat dempuèi mai de 3 meses

Lo vòte comença a 00:00 lo 1èr de genièr de 2010 (UTC) fins a 23:59 lo 31 de genièr de 2010 (UTC), aprèp lo quel un contraròtle sera efectuat e los resultats anonciats.

Kapampangan:

(saupan yu kami king pamaglikas ning kapabaluan a ini)

Deng anggang kayanib ning comunidad a Wikimedia community a makibat kareng makatuking condicion o kapaliarian, agkatan lang magbotu king munikala dikil kareng global sysops:

• Kailangan, atin lang makarehistrung account
• 150 edit king e kukulang king metung a proyectu
• 3 bulan a makarehistru

Maliari ing pamagbotu manibat 00:00, 1 Enero 2010 (UTC) anggang 23:59, 31 Enero 2010 (UTC), at kaibat na niti, marapat ing metung a pamaniuring alang kakabiran (non-partisan review), at papaliari do reng resulta.

Polski:

(pomóż nam przetłumaczyć ten komunikat)

Wszyscy członkowie społeczności Wikimedia, którzy spełniają poniższe kryteria, są uprawnieni do głosowania nad propozycją utworzenia uprawnienia globalnego administratora:

• wykonało się co najmniej 150 edycji w jednym z projektów
• posiada się konto zarejestrowane co najmniej 3 miesiące temu

Głosowanie rozpoczyna się 1 stycznia 2010 o godzinie 00:00 (UTC), a zakończy 31 stycznia 2010 o godzinie 23:59 (UTC). Po tym czasie niezależna osoba sprawdzi poprawność głosowania i zatwierdzi wyniki.

Português :

(ajude-nos a traduzir esta mensagem)

Todos os membros da comunidade Wikimedia que cumpram os seguintes requisitos estão convidados a votar na proposta de administradores globais:

• 150 edições em pelo menos um projeto
• 3 meses de registro

A votação começará às 00:00, 1º de Janeiro de 2010 (UTC) e terminará às 23:59, 31 de Janeiro de 2010 (UTC); a partir desse momento começará um estudo independente dos votos para determinar o resultado.

Русский:

(помогите нам перевести это сообщение)

Все участники сообщества Викимедиа, соответствующие нижеприведённым критериям, приглашаются к участию в голосовании по предложению о глобальных администраторах:

• 150 правок хотя бы в одном из проектов
• 3 месяца с момента регистрации

Голосование начнётся 1 января 2010 в 00:00 и будет длиться до 23:59 31 января 2010 года (UTC), после чего будут подведены независимые итоги и оглашены результаты.

Slovenčina:

(pomôžte nám preložiť túto správu)

Všetci členovia komunity Wikimedia, ktorý spĺňajú nasledujúce kritéria sú pozvaný voliť na návrh globálnych administrátorov:

• Mať registrovaný účet
• 150 úprav na minimálne jednom projekte
• 3 mesiace od založenia účtu

Volenie bude prebiehať od 00:00, 1. januára 2010 (UTC) do 23:59, 31. januára 2010 (UTC), po ktorom bude nasledovať neutrálny posudok a výsledky budú prijaté.

Српски / srpski:

(Помозите нам са преводом ове поруке!)

Сви чланови Викимедија заједнице, који испуњавају наведене критеријуме, су позвани да дају свој глас на гласању о увођењу групе глобалних администратора:

• 150 измена на бар једном пројекту
• најмање 3 месеца пријављени

Гласање траје од 1. јануара 2010. у 00:00 сати (UTC) до 31. јануара 2010. у 23:59 сати (UTC). После гласања, резултате ће објавити једна неутрална особа.

Svenska:

(Hjälp oss översätta detta meddelande)

Alla medlemmar i Wikimedia-gemenskapen som uppfyller följande kriterier uppmanas att rösta om förslaget globala administratörer:

• 150 redigeringar på minst ett projekt
• 3 månaders registrering

Omröstningen kommer att pågå från 00:00, 1 januari 2010 (UTC) till 23:59, 31 januari 2010 (UTC), varefter en opartisk översyn kommer att göras som fastställer resultatet.

ไทย:

(ช่วยเราด้วยการแปล)

สมาชิกของประชาคมวิกิมีเดียที่มีคุณสมบัติครบตามที่ปรากฎด้านล่างนี้ได้รับเชิญให้ลงคะแนนเพื่อเห็นชอบหรือคัดค้านการมีผู้ดูแลระบบสากล (Global Sysops):

• ต้องมีชื่อบัญชีผู้ใช้ที่ลงทะเบียนแล้ว
• มีการแก้ไขอย่างน้อย 150 ครั้งในโครงการใดๆ
• ลงทะเบียนมาแล้วอย่างน้อย 3 เดือน

โดยการลงคะแนนจะเริ่มต้นตั้งแต่วันที่ 1 มกราคม 2010 (พ.ศ.2553) เวลา 00:00น. (ตามเวลาสากล UTC หรือ 7.00น. ตามเวลาประเทศไทย) จนถึงวันที่ 31 มกราคม 2010 (พ.ศ.2553) เวลา 23:59น. (ตามเวลาสากล UTC หรือ 6.59น. ของวันที่ 1 กุมภาพันธ์ ตามเวลาประเทศไทย) หลังจากเวลาดังกล่าว คำวิจารณ์และการลงคะแนนจะถูกรับรองและจะดำเนินการตามผลคะแนนเสียงส่วนใหญ่

Türkçe:

(bu iletiyi çevirmemize yardımcı olun)

Wikimedia Topluluğunun aşağıdaki koşulları sağlayan tüm üyeleri küresel sistem yöneticiliği önergesini oylamaya davet edilmektedir:

• Herhangi bir projede en az 150 değişikliğe,
• 3 aylık üyeliğe sahip olunmalı.

Oylama eşgüdümlü evrensel saate göre 1 Ocak 2010 saat 00:00'dan, 31 Ocak 2010 saat 23:59'a kadar sürecek ve ardından tarafsız bir incelemeden sonra sonuçlar yasalaştırılacaktır.

Українська:

(допоможіть перекласти це повідомлення)

Усі користувачі спільноти Wikimedia, що відповідають таким критеріям, запрошуються до голосування з приводу кандидатів у глобальні адміністратори:

• не менше 150 редагувань в одному з проектів
• не менше 3 місяців з дати реєстрації

Голосування триває з 00:00 1 січня 2010 (UTC) до 23:59 31 січня 2010 (UTC), після чого будуть підбиті підсумки і оголошено результат.

Tiếng Việt:

(giúp chúng tôi dịch thông báo này)

Mời tất cả các thành viên cộng đồng Wikimedia thỏa mãn các tiêu chí sau tham gia bỏ phiếu cho đề xuất bảo quản viên toàn dự án:

• Phải mở tài khoản được ít nhất 3 tháng
• Có 150 sửa đổi tại ít nhất một dự án

Cuộc bỏ phiếu sẽ bắt đầu từ 00:00, 1 tháng 1 năm 2010 (UTC) đến 23:59, 31 tháng 1 năm 2010 (UTC), sau đó sẽ được một người trung lập duyệt lại và thông báo kết quả.

粵語:

(幫手譯)

參加全域管理員方案投票嘅用戶須要符合下列要求︰

• 喺至少一個計劃編輯多過一百五十次
• 註冊超過三個月

投票期：2010年1月1號00:00（UTC）至2010年1月31號23:59（UTC），之後就會覆核選票同埋公布結果。

文言:

(助譯之)

全域有秩方案票選，凡與者，

須編典，至少一部，且纂之多於百又五十，

並增簿迄今，三月有余。

票選始於己丑年十一月十七，終於己丑年十二月十七，爾後核之而不頗，並布其果。

中文（简体）：

(help us translate this message)

参加全域管理员方案投票的元维基维基人需要符合下列条件:

• 在至少一个计划，编辑次数不少于150次
• 注册超过3个月

投票时间：2010年1月1日00:00（UTC）至2010年1月31日23:59（UTC）。之后将会作出中立的方案并颁布结果。

中文（繁體）:

(協助翻譯)

全域管理員方案投票參與者須符下列要求︰

• 於至少一個計劃中編輯逾一百五十次
• 註冊逾三個月

投票期：2010年1月1日00:00（UTC）至2010年1月31日23:59（UTC），及後會覆核選票並公布結果。

Yes

Please place your vote at the bottom of the list.

1. NW (Talk) 00:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
2. Maximillion Pegasus 00:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
3. Barras ^talk 00:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
4. James (T|C) 00:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC) I think this is an important position that has long been needed to help the stewards, in the end those who get the bit need to be carefully chosen because of the sensitivity of working with small and growing communities but needed still.
5. msh210@enwikt 00:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
6. I don't see why not.--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 00:14, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
7. vvv^t 00:14, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
8. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 00:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
9. ···Katerenka (討論) 00:39, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
10. Care in choosing these folk is key but this is a needed and useful thing. ++Lar: t/c 00:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
11. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 01:34, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
12. --WizardOfOz 01:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
13.  Support This is a good idea. Tempodivalse [talk] 03:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
14. support. There are good reasons for it; individual wikis can opt out altogether; and problems with individual global sysops can be addressed as explained. Rd232 11:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     Support Why not !!!

15. GSMR 03:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
16. --Bart0278 03:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
17. --MisterWiki (talk) 03:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

    IRTC1015 03:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

    I agree. --Awesong 03:25, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

    You are ineligible to vote (registration before October 1, 2009 is required). vvv^t 21:55, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

18. Help needed! Laaknor 03:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
19. Masrudin 03:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

    Kwj2772 (msg) 03:48, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

20. --Jivee Blau 03:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

    Yes. Wq-man 03:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

    You are ineligible to vote (registration before October 1, 2009 is required). vvv^t 22:06, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

21. Durr. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
22. PeterSymonds 03:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
23. Nifky? 04:24, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

    Ganondolf 04:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

24. YES. This facility to be provided only for 3 years. Further, after 3 years also, if no one want to become a Administrator within the Project, then it means that there is no real responsible person in the project. So, if it happens like that then the project should be closed down and no help should be provided from outside the project. --TRYPPN 04:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
25. The proposal adequately addresses the main issues I had, and will result in large benefits for our smaller wikis. It should be implemented sooner rather than later.  — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 04:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
26. Definite necessity for our smaller projects. –blurpeace ^(talk) 08:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
27. All help is welcome, and any project can opt-out if the community feels that they don't need (or want) it. –Ejs-80 08:38, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
28. A fine proposal in favor of our smaller wikis. IShadowed 08:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
29. Per my comments at Talk:Global sysops. Tiptoety ^talk 09:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
30. Those small projects would benefit a lot from this. ≈ Chamal ^talk ¤ 09:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
31. Long overdue --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
32. Yes BejinhanTalk 12:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
33. 3s 13:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
34. ZorroIII 13:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
35. LeinaD (t) 14:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC) cross-wiki patrollers are very helpful and part of them should have GS priviliges
36. Ulflarsen 14:38, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

     Support --Ellysse 15:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

    You are ineligible to vote (registration before October 1, 2009 is required). vvv^t 22:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

    Bjoertvedt 14:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

    Please log in to vote (diff). vvv^t 22:35, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

37. --Kjetil_r 16:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
38. Would definitely be helpful. --Erwin 16:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
39. I'm a bit skeptical about global blocks, but the rest of the permissions seem fine. --FiliP ██ 16:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
40. Same as dungy. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC) P.S.: Longer German explanation: w:de:Benutzer:DerHexer/Blog#Global_sysops
41. Jon Harald Søby 16:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
42. Multichill 17:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
43. Atluxity 17:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
44. (moved vote) - Some users said vandalism etc. on small projects is a bigger problem than I thought. The proposal seems to be fine. Lolsimon 18:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
45. Petter Bøckman 18:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
46. Vigorous action 18:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
47. Fruggo 18:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

    Sustructu 19:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

    Please confirm that you are actually nl:User:Sustructu. vvv^t 22:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

48. Per Mike.lifeguard--Vito Genovese 20:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
49. Coffee (talk) 20:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
50. Seddon 20:56, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
51. iAlex 20:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
52. Mezelf14 21:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
53. -- Prince Kassad 23:39, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
54. --DaB. 23:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC) Why not. As long as they don't interfere in middle and big wikis.
55. --StG1990 23:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
56. -- smial 23:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
57. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 02:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
58. --ZaDiak 02:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
59. bibliomaniac15 02:25, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
60. Cirt (talk) 06:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
61. Yes. Pmlineditor ∞ 07:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
62. -Harrywad 11:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
63. — putnik 12:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
64. --MF-W 13:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
65. Cumulus 14:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
66.  Support lightening the load on stewards with this supporting role. ~ Ningauble 16:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
67.  Support Sounds good. Glacier Wolf 16:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
68. A333 19:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
69. --Peroxwhy2gen 08:46, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
70. EdBever 08:57, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
71. Red 81 10:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
72. Lampak 11:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
73. I think we have to help small projects, because they can’t help themselves and vandals can very easily kill them at the beginning of their ‘life’. Tajniak2 14:31, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
74. Taketa 15:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
75. Beany 23:49, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
76. MBisanz ^talk 01:31, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
77. Robotje 09:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
78. Mhaesen 11:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
79. Good idea! Aku506 12:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
80. Erik1980 13:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
81. Herr Kriss 18:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
82. m:Mark W (Mwpnl) ¦ talk 19:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
83. ken123 19:26, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
84. Ency 19:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC) pl why not
85. EMeczKa 20:02, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
86. Merdis 20:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
87. Aotearoa 20:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
88. Trivelt 21:14, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
89. Willking1979 01:50, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
90. RubiksMaster110 04:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
91. Angela 04:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
92. Phantomsteve 15:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
93. --The Evil IP address 22:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
94. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 02:17, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
95. – Innv | d | s: 02:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
96. Karol007 ✉ 02:53, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
97. -- Avi 04:09, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
98. - miya 06:02, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
99. --Bsadowski1 06:12, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
100. -- Razorflame 06:18, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
101. Gdarin | talk 10:21, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
102. Cycn 11:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
103. --Kaganer 13:26, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
104. Diegusjaimes 14:58, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
105. --Jan eissfeldt 17:38, 6 January 2010 (UTC) of course

     User:8BitHero 20:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

     ineligible to vote (not enough edits) James (T|C) 00:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

106. --Thunderhead 21:51, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

     94.224.94.149 23:26, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

107. Kafziel 01:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
108. --Taichi - (あ！) 01:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
109. Frank 01:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
110. NativeForeigner 01:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     Valicore 01:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

     ineligible to vote (not enough edits) James (T|C) 00:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

     Odehammar 01:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC) The stewards must need help, as this proposition has been made. Granting more users stewardship is complicated, as they are already too few. Ergo, this proposition seems to be a solution, at least for now.

     Jeffwang16 01:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     ineligible (not enough edits) James (T|C) 01:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

111. Addihockey10 01:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
112. Stinging Swarm 01:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
113. Emrahertr 01:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
114. Geni 01:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
115. ZooPro 01:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
116. Bradybd 01:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
117. Please, this will be helpful. Ceranthor 01:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     Andrew Petersen 17:54, 6 January 2010 (PST) Alright, then!

     Ip vote, claimed account not eligible James (T|C) 01:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

118. Guettarda 01:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     Deehh 01:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     User is ineligable (not enough edits) James (T|C) 01:30, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

119.  Support I see no reason why not, as along as the right people are chosen for the role. Argyle 4 Life 02:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
120. —§ stay (sic)! 02:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
121. Syohei.A(talk) 02:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
122. Blodance 02:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
123. Saebjorn 02:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
124. Sander Fraga 02:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
125. Ryan Postlethwaite 02:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
126. oscar 02:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
127. DrNegative 02:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
128. Maxima m 02:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
129. Evalowyn 02:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
130. Mind the gap 02:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     Gravedig2 2:31 7 January 2010 (UTC)

131. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
132. On en-wiki we have many admins that can quickly respond to problems. There are not nearly as many admins on other projects and there is huge potential for pressing matters to get incredibly backlogged. Having global admins will help alleviate this problem. Valley2city^‽ 02:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
133. Even the little projects should have people looking out for them. AP1787 02:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
134. Tarheel95 02:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
135. As primarily an en user, and the only other language I understand is Malay, it is unlikely I will ever be involved in a project needing global sysops, but it sounds like it will be a good idea for those that need it Nil Einne 02:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
136. Editor182 13:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     OurDigitalVision Please be more responsible

137. I don't see why not. Bloodmerchant 03:01, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
138. Yes, but there is potential for serious misunderstandings caused by language issues Thparkth 03:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     Yes Mimar77 03:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     Darkbluesun 03:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC) As wiki gets bigger, this could be the answer to make sure the information stays accurate and clean. On the other hand, this move could seriously slow progress couldn't it? I'll have to trust the stewards. They do a lot of the dirty work.

     user ineligible (not enough edits) James (T|C) 02:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

139. billinghurst 03:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Absolutely.
140. Carl 03:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
141. --Taweetham 03:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
142. Commander Keane 03:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     This has tremendous potential to improve the capacity of smaller projects, and to encourage a sort of broad-based community. I look forward to seeing how this will operate Steve Joseph 03:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

143. Perey 03:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Makes perfect sense to me. Clearly the stewards need the help, or else this would have been a non-proposal.
144. This change is long overdue, as experience with chr wikipedia demonstrated a few years ago. Wikiacc (§) 03:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     iSquishy

145. Yes. Teinesavaii 03:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
146. Zwilson14 03:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
147. Shooter16101 03:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
148. Yes. --The New Mikemoral 03:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
149. DerAndre 04:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     Yes, Fully support --Bentoman 04:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     Adi4094 04:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     User ineligible (must have registered before October 1st) James (T|C) 02:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

     --§Triple.Rhu 04:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

150.  Support Shivashree 04:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
151.  Support Calebrw 04:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
152. Yes, --Sarumo74 04:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC).

     Mr. Anon515 04:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

153. --Bellayet 04:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
154. --Atu 04:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
155.  Support As long as it's not abused, it's a good idea. For.--Maximz2005 04:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
156. Yk Yk Yk 04:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
157. Yes. Magnefl 04:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     --Fischy 04:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

158. Terence 05:01, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
159. Yes. Logical proposal providing necessary help. Ezratrumpet 05:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
160. Juan Miguel 05:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
161. --J Hazard 05:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
162. If help is needed then we should help Chaosdruid 05:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
163. Yes. We need a way to quickly stop vandalism. Eric Scubeesnax 05:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
164. Yes. Seablade 05:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
165. Jamesjiao 05:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
166.  Support Yes Noraft 05:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
167. Alvaro qc 05:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
168.  Support Yes --Delivi 05:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
169. Because the projects are allowed to opt-out. -- kh80 05:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
170.  Support. It is very good idea. Mondalor 05:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
171. Geanixx 05:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
172.  Support I think it goes without saying that Global sysops should be chosen very carefully from a pool of multi-lingual users with considerable experience in several different wiki's. Considering the brutal scrutiny local sysops candidates undergo, I don't think quality control and carefree sysopsing on a global scale is a concern. Angrysockhop 06:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
173.  Support IlyaHaykinson 06:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
174.  Support Aldo samulo 06:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
175. Nixón 06:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
176.  Support The wikis that are this small need the extra help, and as long as the Global sysops are picked carefully, I think that the idea is an excellent way to make sure they get that help. Trinity507 06:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
177.  Support IVP 06:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support --84.60.37.89 06:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     Ip vote, please login to vote James (T|C) 02:54, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

178.  Support nat ^{Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?!} 06:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
179.  Support --Labant 06:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
180. Kv75 06:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support'd. perhaps wikis on external sites elect to be included in this list, if they feel that they would be better off with the aid of these obviously-ver--Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 08:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)y-qualified editors. I assume wikis about specific topics are not under Wikimedia's administration, but if they are being overrun with vandals or have administrators fighting, these sites could issue a metaphorical call for help through whatever medium we set up. The next version of the wiki software could include a tag of whether or not to allow these people power, and they (the external wikis) could add themselves to the privilege list. Sompm 06:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

181.  Support--Shizhao 06:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
182. --Heiko 06:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
183. Hohohob 07:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
184.  Support - Wysprgr2005 07:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
185. --Djlordi 07:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
186.  Supportמתניה 07:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
187.  Support Dovi 07:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
188.  Support --Caponer 07:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
189.  Support CaribDigita 07:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC) I read through many of the "No"s and I believe Global sysops might be able to guide new upstart projects in the right direction until they get more established. As it was stated, if it just simply deleted because it is small, then nothing new will ever obtain the chance to become firmly established.

      Support seems to be a good idea, to support understaffed wikis --Nickaat 08:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

190.  Support Kimchi.sg 08:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
191.  Support - seems like a good idea--Pianoplonkers 08:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support CntRational 08:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Sure.

192.  Support --Petri 08:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
193.  Support - if a project still has the right to decide if global sysops should have admin rights in their project, then yes. Cavernia 08:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support -- Clamiax 09:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

194. Great idea! —what a crazy random happenstance 08:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
195. --DS-fax 08:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
196.  Support +1 I think that this would avoid SURP and other cross wikis problems. --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 08:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
197.  Support Merlissimo 08:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
198.  Support In the early stage of the project, someone who don't know project's language may get admin right for maintenance. After the project grow enough, that admin right might be questioned by newcomers, as they don't have neither consensus nor RfA. Global sysop can avoid those situation, I think. If it was mandatory for all project, I might say No. --Peremen 08:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
199.  Support Kenrick95 08:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
200.  Support --Wvk 08:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
201. --Treublatt 08:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
202.  Support VMS Mosaic 08:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
203.  Support --Lutz Terheyden 08:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
204.  Support --Faizhaider 08:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
205.  Support, I like this idea. --Mercy 09:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
206.  Support --Ragimiri 09:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
207.  Support good idea for small projects --Tlusťa 09:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
208.  Support Reduction of Steward - workload by distributing "simple" admin tasks on adminless wikis. --Guandalug 09:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
209.  Support While I have grave reservations about adding in extra levels of hierarchy (K.I.S.S.), after carefully reading through this I can see the point of it so I support it. Mathmo 09:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
210.  Support --Vigilius 09:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
211.  Support - Very efficient way to improove the organization of "understaffed" projects. Leujohn ^(talk) 09:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
212.  Support I have personally been part of many small-languages Wikipedias where a shortage of admins doing trivial (ie. non-controversial) tasks has slowed the project's growth. DaGizza 09:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
213. --Euku 09:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
214. --Fschubert 09:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
215. Weak support. Generally a good idea but I have a queasy feeling about global blocks. According to Global blocking, such blocks would extend to all WMF wikis, even those outside the global sysop scope. Which is OK as long as a global sysop's main task is combatting massive blatant vandalism on very small projects, so I'd say give the proposal a try and see how it works out.--GrafZahl (talk) 10:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
216.  Support Makes sense. rursus 10:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
217.  Support -- Klaus Eifert 10:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
218.  Support Yes/Kyllä --Jepse 10:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
219.  Support Seems sensibly bounded by parameters. --Dweller 10:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
220.  Support--Rsmn 10:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
221. {{Support} --Harald Haugland 10:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
222.  Support Very sensible idea for projects just getting started. --Clarince63 10:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
223.  Support --Wedderkop 10:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
224. Great idea. Pitke 10:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
225.  Support A well-thought-out way to give small wikis the boost they need to get their act together. Freederick 10:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
226.  Support A Very Good Thing, especially for the small wikis, especially since any that wish to opt out can do so. Andrew Dalby 10:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
227.  Support Seems like a good idea. Alan16 10:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
228.  Support A stimulating way to get admins of small wiki's who don't want to be "overruled" to do their work. Rmeoung 11:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
229.  Support I like the idea very much that small projects get more help in the beginning and can more easily grow. :-) There are so many languages in this world, we don't have just these few that have already a Wikipedia. --Geitost ^diskusjon 11:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
230.  Support Sahmeditor 11:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
231.  Support ThorJH 11:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
232.  Support Razimantv 11:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
233.  Support There seem to be enough restrictions, like ability of projects to opt out that I think there are enough checks that this will be net good. Jbolden1517 11:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
234.  Support notafish }<';> 11:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
235.  Support --თოგო ^(D) 11:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
236.  Support Support blindspots can create significant problems for the project as a whole. SamJohnston 11:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
237. Working on a small wiki myself I can see this being something of a Godsend for most. Garden 11:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
238.  Support Daniel (‽) 11:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
239.  Support Seems good to me. I am a Sysop on the Wikis I have, I know how hard it is to keep them "clean" Knee427 11:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
240.  Support Absolutley WilliamF1two 11:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
241.  Support I agree with the folks who say that a small wiki without enough admins shouldn't be shut down. It may someday grow into something great. JulieSpaulding 11:59, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
242.  Support. The ability to hit vandals across the various language wikipedias will be a net positive. Mjroots 12:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC) ( Admin Mjroots on en.wiki)
243.  Support. Very useful for our job at SWMT. --Lucien leGrey (m · es) 12:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
244.  Support we'll be very useful for the little project (even on the french wikisource, we're short of admin sometimes !). Cdlt, VIGNERON * ^discut. 12:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
245.  Support --ThT 12:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
246.  Support Vladimir.frolov 12:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
247. --alexscho 12:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
248.  Support Tomatoman 12:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
249.  Support Trdsf 12:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
250.  Support--Cyrillic 12:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Seems like a good idea.
251. --Nemo 12:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
252.  Support Mheart 12:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
253.  Support --Pitlane02 12:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
254.  Support Doktorbuk 12:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
255. ⇦REDVERS⇨ 13:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
256.  Support --BokicaK 13:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
257.  Support - As much as I despise most of the janitors on the English Wikipedia, I do recognize that their existance is necessary. This proposal seems perfectly rational and unlikely to cause strife for the small projects it will effect given its opt-out clause. Nutiketaiel 13:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
258.  Support - While it would probably be preferable to have a larger, more active stewards corp (which if it existed would negate the need for this proposal), we don't. Chrism 13:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
259.  Support - Proposal seems rational and for the betterment of the entire Wiki community. --Mwilso24 13:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
260.  Support J-L Cavey 13:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
261.  Support I agree, small wiki have problems to get sysop. Vasiľ 13:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
262.  Support Will help us get at cross-wiki vandals who use small wikis to create malicious accounts. NawlinWiki 13:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support 194.41.152.158 13:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     • IP ineligible to vote. John Vandenberg 02:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

263.  Support Muro de Aguas 13:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
264.  Support Tostan 13:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
265.  Support Conaughy 13:59, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
266.  Support I think this is a good way to improve small wikis -- HF cars and sets 14:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
267.  Support Good idea. Raychut 14:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
268. Yes. Tgkprog 14:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
269. Yes. Swatjester 14:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
270.  Support Evet! --Goktr001 14:12, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
271.  Support I support. Albertus Aditya 14:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
272.  Support Linedwell@frwiki 14:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
273.  Support --FischX 14:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
274.  Support--VincenzoX 14:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
275.  Support --амдф 14:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
276.  Support --TheGrimReaper NS 14:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
277. --Sanbec 15:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     Joe N 15:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     Vote made by an IP -Barras ^talk 18:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

278.  Support A sensible extra layer of defense against mass vandalism attacks. Durova 15:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
279.  Support --Frank schubert 15:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
280.  Support I have no reason not to vote on this good idea... A idea that helps wikipedia, why don't vote? SunProj3cT 15:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
281.  Support -- small wikis need some help. Renata3 15:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
282.  Support Taking a hit for the little guy sounds good to me. Neelix 15:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
283. Sandstein 15:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
284.  Support. Since trust is not a matter of languages -- Vwm 15:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
285.  Support Christian Giersing 15:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
286. Don't agree with the silly support templates but chalk this up as a support Spartaz 15:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
287.  Support --Engelbaet 15:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
288.  Support IF handled with care, it's worth a try. Especially potentially useful for small Wikip-projects --ArchiSchmedes Talk 15:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
289.  Support for small wikis only, where stewards were (and still currently are, I suppose) performing such anti-vandalism tasks. --Paginazero - Ø 15:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
290.  Support --ゆきち 15:59, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
291.  Support This is an important tool to help moribund languages or ones whose users are not very net-savvy to get a leg up. Warmest Regards, :)—_thecurran Speak your mind ^{my past} 16:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
292.  Support Carolfrog 16:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
293.  Support Neeters 16:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
294.  Support Juliabackhausen 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
295.  Support -- zur887 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
296.  Support --Morten Haan 16:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support robaco 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

297.  Support --Lépton ^✉ 16:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
298.  Support --Transmissionelement 16:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
299.  Support 16:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
300.  Support Sensible approach to solving a real problem. FloNight 16:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support --TheBestPilarYouWillEverSee 16:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

301.  Support –neurovelho 16:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
302.  Support. JamieS93 16:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
303.  Support Kubłok31 16:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
304.  Support /Poxnar 16:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
305.  Support Tpt 16:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
306.  Support Tuvalkin 17:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
307.  Support Hosiryuhosi 17:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
308.  Support --FlügelRad 17:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
309.  Support Fantastic idea, as long as they are not annoying and act "the hard man". Conay 17:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
310.  Support --Anthony Ivanoff 17:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
311.  Support this idea. Actually it has already been tested in Wikia (helpers), and it works. Wassily Steik 17:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
312.  Support Hrcolyer 17:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
313.  Support Catherine 17:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support Jyka 19:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

314.  Support With caution, as per Kimdino. — OwenBlacker (Talk) 17:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
315.  Support Kaldari 17:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
316.  Support Arkuat 17:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC) The opt-out by local consensus is very important to me; it looks as if a project with 10 administrators, 3 of whom are active at any given time, can opt-out by consensus. Otherwise I wouldn't support.
317. Laser brain 17:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
318.  Support Ateria 17:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support Braveheart09 17:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

319.  Support The Anome 17:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
320.  Support Migt be useful for small african wikis JAn Dudík 17:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
321.  Support Will be good for smaller Wikis. But let´s see if is it working or not. --Chmee2 17:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
322.  Support SBC-YPR 17:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
323.  Support --DieBuche 18:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
324.  Support Why not? Clearly, many smaller projects need this. Innotata 18:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
325.  Support Stefaniak 18:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
326. Support. -AlexSm 18:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
327. Support --M/ 18:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
328.  Support Rajiv Varma 18:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
329.  Support --Amrum 18:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
330. Very yes. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 18:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support --Pattiz 18:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

331.  Support Yo creo que esto es algo bueno para la wiki ya que hay muchos vandalos--Moms10 19:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
332.  Support Cocoaguy^talk_contribs‽ 19:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
333.  Support --Krdan 19:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
334.  Support Raysonho 19:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
335.  Support --Toobaz 19:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support --Dunshocking 19:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Happy to support the majority vote; thanks for the vote!

336. --Thalan
337. Seems useful. No such power than stewards --Sargoth 19:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
338.  Support Sebk. 19:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
339.  Support --Amir E. Aharoni 19:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
340. Izno 19:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support --Skamecrazy123 19:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

341.  Support - Eric-Wester 19:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
342.  Support -- Cozzycovers 19:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
343.  Support Good idea. I believe it can help the projects. --egg 19:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
344.  Support Seems a good idea - Lnegro 20:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
345.  Support I wonder about knowledge about local languages (and of the sustainability of a project with less than 10 admins over the long term). There are good practical reasons stated in the oppose section below (such as the need for global admins to exercise sensitivity with respect to allowing smaller wiki to develop autonomously) but in essence this seems quite practical. --rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid (coṁrá) 20:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
346.  Support - Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) 20:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
347.  Support GameOn 20:12, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support - Armageddon11 20:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

348.  Support - Rainmonger 20:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
349.  Support I think this will be a very helpful position for developing the smaller Wikipedia projects and it seems like very little harm can come from this, so I support it. I Feel Tired 20:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
350.  Support --Alterego 20:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
351.  Support – ClockworkSoul 20:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC): This seems like a good idea in principle, and I'll be interested to see how it develops.
352. Shii 20:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
353. --Osd@ruwiki 20:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
354. --Philippe 20:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
355. --Enemenemu 20:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Looks like a solution for a problem
356.  Support Sole Soul 21:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
357. --AFBorchert 21:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC) I assume that small wikis will profit from this solution. Most vandalisms or spam postings are in English or other major languages, not necessarily in the language of the small wikis. Similarly, copyright violations can be in many cases handled without knowing the wiki's language.
358.  Support – Lumos3 21:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Small Wikis need the protection of the whole community or they may be vunerable to disruption which in turn will reflect on the reputation of the whole of Wikipedia.
359.  Support Gkarpljuk 22:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
360.  Support Wikipedia is big; around 3 million articles by 20 million users. However lots of the amount is vandalism which should be reduced if the idea comes true. Jeremjay24 21:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
361.  Support Pschemp 21:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
362.  Support Knuddel8 22:21, 7 January 2010 (CET) I support that. I don't think the volunteers will abuse their rights and I don't think that their will be any volunteers chosen who aren't serious enough.
363.  Support Absolute power corrupts absolutely; it's a Good Thing this isn't absolute power. Dhatfield 21:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
364.  Support IzzyReal We as a collective entity need to protect the smaller articles. So Heck yeah!
365.  Support --Dreaven3 21:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
366.  Support --cslatlantis 16:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC) Totally great idea. Too many people have been screwing up the facts.
367.  Support --Gereon K. 21:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
368.  Support --Daemorris 21:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
369.  Support --Ding1dong 21:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
370.  Support As long as we are admitting that this is a work around until the smaller wikis can better handle the scourge of internet flaming. I think that inter-wiki cooperation is part of the core of the Wikipedia spirit.--Adam in MO Talk 21:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
371.  Support --Abaumg 21:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
372.  Support Nbarth 21:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
373.  Support Unusual? Quite ^TalkQu 22:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
374.  Support - Vinvlugt 22:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support -  Kaltxì Na'vi!  22:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

     You are ineligible to vote (registration before October 1, 2009 is required). --Church of emacs talk 23:32, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

375.  Support -- Sounds interesting and worth a go. DD2K 22:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
376.  Support -- All Wikipedias bear the same logo, while quality is varying. Global sysops can support the local stewarts, esp. blocking of vandals etc. -- Vertigo Man-iac 22:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
377.  Support – This sounds like a very good idea. We desperately need more structures for inter-wiki communication and coordination, as well as filling a role that the stewards are unable to manage through shortage of numbers. I would be keen to see proposals for meetings of the GSs every ?three months or so, possibly with the stewards. Tony1 22:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
378.  Support I like this idea --Adrille 22:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
379.  Support --Zinnmann 22:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
380.  Support ok -Kacembepower 22:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
381.  Support G8crash3r 22:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Great idea. I think I can help out if given the opportunity.
382.  Support I support the motion Endo999 22:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
383.  Support - Much needed. -- Avenue 22:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
384.  Support --ysangkok 22:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
385. Majorly talk 23:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
386.  Support I agree with the idea behind this as long as the opt-out is there. Woody 23:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
387.  Support --Pelz 23:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
388.  Support - I support whatever will provide help for smaller wikis. -- Atama頭 23:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
389.  Support - We need effective ways and tools against vandalism. I hope this will help! --Ulanwp 23:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
390.  Support --Computerjoe 23:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
391.  Support -- Montgomery 23:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
392.  Support I agree with Paginazero. --Fredericks 23:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
393.  Support Makes sense to me.-LtMuldoon
394. Yup. Makes perfect sense. BG7 23:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
395.  Support --MoRsE 23:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
396.  Support --Schmendrik881 23:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
397.  Support Adambro 00:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
398.  Support --Something12356789101 00:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
399.  Support Royalbroil 00:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
400.  Support --Emes 00:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
401.  Support Fetchcomms 00:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
402.  Support --Rab777hp 19:32, 8 January 2019 (EST) This is necessary because it helps keep the level of control up, and also deals with the question of allowing more stewards in or not.
403.  Support I think this is a reasonable way to maintain a level of nessacary controll, and continue to foster an productive environment for the free exchange of ideas. Rampant unicorn 00:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
404.  Support I'm not convinced this will solve all the issues it is supposed to, but it's certainly worth a try Wefa 00:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
405.  Support AndrewRT 00:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC) Sounds reasonable and positive, with the greatest potential for harm neutralised through allowing opt outs. In practice I think it's naive to think the idea that global sysops will remain strictly limited to "urgent abuse and non-controversial maintenance" and would not end up with the same power structure attributes that en-wp admins have. Likewise, I'm not positive about asking stewards to make the decision (they should be strictly implementing community decisions only). Nonetheless, still support. AndrewRT 00:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
406.  Support bonne idée --Ofol 01:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
407.  Support --St. Alex 01:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
408.  Support --E020613 01:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
409.  Support Definitely a good idea. —MC10 (T•C•L•EM) 01:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
410.  Support Sneaky 013 01:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
411.  Support -- Wesha 02:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
412.  Support --Ukexpat 02:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
413. Support, sounds like a good idea--Jac16888 02:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
414.  Support --Giants27 Talk to Me 02:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
415.  Support --Wikitiki89 02:13, 8 January 2010 (UTC) The only thing I have to say is that I think the requirements for number of admins should be changed because I feel that ten admins or three active admins is not nearly enough admins.
416.  Support Themfromspace 02:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
417. --Jodoform 02:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
418.  Support--Christian Lindecke 02:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
419.  Support GreenReaper 02:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
420. Yup, but we need to be sure that these people are unequivocally and completely trusted before appointing them to a position like this. Ed (talk) 02:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
421.  Support Slark 02:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
422.  Support --Patar knight 02:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
423.  Support Seems sane enough and commensurate with the problem. --Kay Dekker 02:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
424.  Support Nothing I can think of that would make this a bad idea. --Shirik 02:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
425.  Support Andrew Lenahan - <FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT> 02:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
426.  Support ~fl 02:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
427.  Support Bouchecl 02:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
428.  Support BfPage Hey can I be one of those sysops?
429.  Support — a very good idea. Cheers, Jack Merridew 02:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support Jamie314 02:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC) This is fine, provided there is adequate moderation. As others have said, we don't want to create power issues or invite abuse.

      Support--Personplacething 02:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC) I strongly agree with this proposal.

      Support--9548coolgirl 20:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC) This is the best idea I've heard of. I for one support this cause. Oh, and my vote is yes.

      Support --Plommespiser 19:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

430.  Support--jmans25 20:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC) This is good, as long as they get a lot less privileges than anmins. We DON'T need another group with the same privileges than admins.
431.  Support --Deanmullen09 21:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC) In the word of the hopi indians "those who cannot accept change will fall dead with their own fear of that change" so why not?
432. Tentative  Support Shoefly 18:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC) This change should not create any power monopolies.
433.  Support Christopher Pritchard 18:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC), I support as I feel that it will allow for more people to focus on editing, with less people needing to be sysops (as the global ones can take care of this)
434.  Support User: Gullit Torres, I support because I think it'll get better the the Wikipedia's jod, chosing the best people and increasing the articles.
435.  Support Carptrash 17:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC) I'll try anything . . . . ...... once.
436.  Support (Wiki id2 16:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC))
437.  SupportKimdino 15:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Care needs to be taken on appointment of these people though. I believe they will need to operate with a light touch. They must also realise that they are subsidiary to the wiki 'owners' and only providing a supporting role. Certainly, as stated elsewhere, no hitlers.
438. Template:Orion11 Yes, thats good
439.  Support I think this is a great idea, provided care is taken in choosing the right person for thejob. It will go wrong if we recruit people who are likely to go all superior and start being nazi on editing.
440. TomBeasley 13:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
441.  SupportFindiver13:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC) I like the above wording : "start being nazi on editing"
442.  Support DarioAlvarez
443. --Teepoet 10:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Yes.
444. James Brian Ellis 08:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
445. WngLdr34 04:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC) I for one support our new Sysop overlords (seriously though there are too many mods we need supermods, hells yes.
446.  Support with obvious need for careful thought in the selection process. Kafka Liz 03:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
447. --Closedmouth 03:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
448.  Support I think this is a good thing as long as one is qualified and this does not start an issue of power abuse. Canyouhearmenow
449.  Support A vandal can run wild on a smaller wiki with only rollbackers around to control them. Any viable project has enough local privileges to close deletion discussions, run RfA's, etc. But, as I understand the proposal, global sysops are for blocking vandals, removing obvious spam/attack pages, etc- things that need done ASAP, not when the stretched thin local admins are online. Bradjamesbrown 03:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
450.  Support Good idea. Roberto de Lyra 03:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support I like this idea, it will hopefully further prevent vandalism on the wikis. --Thejetset1 03:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

451.  Support Steven Walling (talk) 03:42, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
452.  Support Seems like a good idea. Can't see why this wouldn't be beneficial to the smaller wikis. --FlyingPenguins 03:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
453.  Support Seems to be a very reasonable proposal to me. Basket of Puppies 03:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
454.  Support I'm not entirely sure whether its really necessary to give them global blocking rights, but that's not enough to make me oppose. The removal process is close to zero-tolerance, which is good. Mr.Z-man 03:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
455. Llakais 03:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
456.  Support If the admins go berserk, we kick them out. Meanwhile, if it promotes efficient use of our human resources aka fellow users, I'm all for it. Paradoctor 04:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
457.  Support Hopefully will reduce vandalism, and I trust that the selection process will be thorough enough to ensure this isn't just another title people try to rack up.--BaronLarf 04:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support I think this is a great idea. I see no reason to oppose this motion. Rintaminator 04:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

458. EMPHATIC  Support. This is a long overdue solution to the abuse of small projects. Grandmasterka 04:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
459.  Support. I hope that this will reduce vandalism, while protections mentioned will prevent abuse. Tigerhawkvok 04:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
460. Very much in  Support of this proposal. This way, there would be less spam and suspicious activity in the wikis. wishfulanthony 05:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
461.  Support Jclemens 05:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
462.  Support Tm93 05:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC) Small wikis need experienced "sysops" to help them grow.

      Support Rudyramjet I am relativly new to the Wiki experiance and I appreciate it when I'm questioned. The steward has always told me why something is supect and what steps are needed to unblock or validate information. I contribute but certainly don't want this project tainted. The reason I contribute is because I believe in the free exchange of solid, verifiable information. We should try this out gang. If it turns into what is "feared" than do like what we are doing now and change it again! To do nothing is not the answer. 17:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

463.  Support Sensible way to help small wikisJohn Quiggin 05:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
464.  Support nice practise for small wikis --Sirozha 05:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
465.  Support Ozob 06:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
466.  Support My own experience with Mediawiki-based projects has taught me that some projects require time to reach the critical mass of volunteers needed to sustain it. These fledgling projects require careful care and watchfulness to grow into mature ones. To abandon the small wikis would be analogous to deleting all stubs. Dcoetzee 06:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
467.  Support As long as projects can opt-out, I think there is little damage that can be done and a lot of help that could be offered. -- Onee 06:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
468. Quiddity 06:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
469. Support only purpose is to assist. Graeme Bartlett 06:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
470.  Support -- Brücke-Osteuropa 06:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
471.  Support -- Worapon B. ^talk 06:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
472. Easiest choice I've made all day. Absolutely. EVula // talk // ☯ // 06:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support --Tholau Definitly YES 087:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC) :)

     Only 1 edit (this vote). Erik Warmelink 09:31, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

473.  Support --.snoopy. ✉ 07:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
474.  Support --Orderinchaos 07:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
475.  Support --JohnMarcelo 07:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
476.  Support --newspaperman 07:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
477.  Support Makes sense -- this will help the smaller projects. --MCB 07:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
478.  Support Needed it for years. Biem 07:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
479. --Revvar 07:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
480.  Support Main opposes seem to be: "they won't know the languages" and "will abuse power". I'm impressed with how confident people are that a few people can control several wikis without having any of the language skills. Clearly a steward and maintenance type role that will benefit smaller wikis and hopefully help them grow; and responding to opposes about focus taken from larger projects: I'm quite ready for en wikipedia and other large wikipedias to take a back seat to other parts of the Wikimedia Foundation; as I see it, greater involvement in the smaller projects naturally enhances the quality and quantity of information lacking from the larger projects anyway. Maedin\^talk 08:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
481.  Support --2thuriel 08:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
482.  Support --Klaws 08:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
483.  Support --Starwiz 08:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
484. Suppport Ged UK 08:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
485.  Support -- Gabriel Kielland 08:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
486. --Eriklindroos 08:46, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
487. Support Clem23 08:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
488.  Support -- Andre315 08:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
489.  Support Pipedreamergrey 08:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC) I'm all for anything that will foster a sense of community among the smaller wikis.
490.  Support Leolaursen 08:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
491.  Support Physchim62 09:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
492.  Support There's no reason to deny it. - Ellif 09:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
493.  Support Don't think this needs to be a different permission than the existing ones, but someone should get those rights, I agree. -- Windharp 09:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
494.  Support --Redagavimas 09:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
495.  Support Stifle 09:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
496.  Support --Patangel 09:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
497.  Support Mpadowadierf 09:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
498.  Support Murgh 09:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
499.  Support --Jan Luca 09:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
500.  Support Altenmann 09:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

      Support Bschandramohan

      Support Ahmad87

501.  Support Cryngo 09:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
502.  Support--Vladimir Solovjev 09:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
503.  Support Yes, it's a good idea. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
504.  Support --Akkifokkusu 10:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
505.  Support--Bdell555 10:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
506.  Support Nobbipunktcom 10:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
507.  Support Archandha 11:10, 8 January 2010 (MET)
508.  Support BabelStone 10:13, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
509.  Support Looks like it is opt in (for larger