Global sysops/Vote: Difference between revisions
Yes. |
→20px Yes: rm my vote |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
# Help needed! [[User:Laaknor|Laaknor]] 03:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC) |
# Help needed! [[User:Laaknor|Laaknor]] 03:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
# [[User:Masrudin|Masrudin]] 03:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC) |
# [[User:Masrudin|Masrudin]] 03:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
# [[User:Kwj2772|Kwj2772]] ([[User talk:Kwj2772|msg]]) 03:48, 1 January 2010 (UTC) |
#: <del>[[User:Kwj2772|Kwj2772]] ([[User talk:Kwj2772|msg]]) 03:48, 1 January 2010 (UTC)</del> |
||
# --[[User:Jivee Blau|Jivee Blau]] 03:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC) |
# --[[User:Jivee Blau|Jivee Blau]] 03:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
#: <s>Yes. [[User:Wq-man|Wq-man]] 03:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)</s> |
#: <s>Yes. [[User:Wq-man|Wq-man]] 03:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)</s> |
Revision as of 03:20, 10 January 2010
Global sysops (Vote) |
العربية:
مصرى:
( ساعدنا فى ترجمة الرساله دى) و تم فتح التصويت على الفكره و ينتهى التصويت فى 31 يناير.
Беларуская:
(дапамажыце перакласьці гэтае паведамленьне)
Български:
(помогнете ни да преведем това съобщение)
Bosanski:
(Pomozite nam sa prevodom ove poruke!)
Català :
(ajudeu a traduir aquest missatge)
کوردی:
( هاوکاریمان بکە لە وەرگێڕانی ئەم پەیامەدا)
Čeština:
(help us translate this message)
Dansk:
(Hjælp os med at oversætte denne besked)
Deutsch:
(Hilf uns bei der Übersetzung dieser Nachricht!)
Dolnoserbski:
(Pomagaj nam toś tu powěźeńku pśedłožyś)
Ελληνικά:
(βοηθήστε μας να μεταφράσουμε αυτό το μήνυμα)
English:
(help us translate this message)
Esperanto:
(Helpo pri la traduko de tiu noto!)
Español :
(ayúdenos con la traducción de este mensaje)
Euskara:
(Lagun gaitzazu mezu honen itzulpenarekin)
فارسی:
(به ما در ترجمه این متن کمک کنید)
Suomi:
(auta meitä kääntämään tämä viesti)
Français :
(Aidez nous a traduire ce message)
Frysk:
(Help ús dit berjocht oer te setten)
Galego:
(axúdanos a traducir esta mensaxe)
Alemannisch :
(Hilf is bi dr Ibersetzig vu däre Nochricht!)
עברית:
Hrvatski:
(Pomozite nam prevesti ovu poruku!)
Hornjoserbsce:
(Pomhaj nam tutu zdźělenku předłožić)
Magyar:
(Kérjük, segíts más nyelvekre is lefordítani ezt a szöveget!)
Interlingua:
(adjuta nos a traducer iste message)
Bahasa Indonesia:
Italiano:
(aiutarci a tradurre questo messaggio)
日本語:
ភាសាខ្មែរ៖
한국어:
Македонски:
(помогнете ни да ја преведеме оваа порака)
Bahasa Melayu:
(Bantu kami menterjemah pesanan ini)
Nederlands:
Occitan :
(Ajudatz-nos a traduire aqueste messatge)
Kapampangan:
(saupan yu kami king pamaglikas ning kapabaluan a ini)
Polski:
(pomóż nam przetłumaczyć ten komunikat)
Português :
(ajude-nos a traduzir esta mensagem)
Русский:
(помогите нам перевести это сообщение)
Slovenčina:
(pomôžte nám preložiť túto správu)
Српски / srpski:
(Помозите нам са преводом ове поруке!)
Svenska:
(Hjälp oss översätta detta meddelande)
ไทย:
Türkçe:
(bu iletiyi çevirmemize yardımcı olun)
Українська:
(допоможіть перекласти це повідомлення)
Tiếng Việt:
(giúp chúng tôi dịch thông báo này)
粵語:
(幫手譯)
中文(简体):
(help us translate this message)
中文(繁體):
(協助翻譯)
|
Please place your vote at the bottom of the list.
- NW (Talk) 00:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Maximillion Pegasus 00:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Barras talk 00:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- James (T|C) 00:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC) I think this is an important position that has long been needed to help the stewards, in the end those who get the bit need to be carefully chosen because of the sensitivity of working with small and growing communities but needed still.
- msh210@enwikt 00:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- I don't see why not.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:14, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- vvvt 00:14, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- J.delanoygabsadds 00:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- ···Katerenka (討論) 00:39, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Care in choosing these folk is key but this is a needed and useful thing. ++Lar: t/c 00:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- delirious & lost ☯ ~hugs~ 01:34, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- --WizardOfOz 01:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Support This is a good idea. Tempodivalse [talk] 03:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- support. There are good reasons for it; individual wikis can opt out altogether; and problems with individual global sysops can be addressed as explained. Rd232 11:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Why not !!!
- GSMR 03:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Bart0278 03:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- --MisterWiki (talk) 03:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
IRTC1015 03:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
I agree. --Awesong 03:25, 1 January 2010 (UTC)- You are ineligible to vote (registration before October 1, 2009 is required). vvvt 21:55, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Help needed! Laaknor 03:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Masrudin 03:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Jivee Blau 03:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Yes. Wq-man 03:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)- You are ineligible to vote (registration before October 1, 2009 is required). vvvt 22:06, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Durr. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- PeterSymonds 03:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Nifky? 04:24, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Ganondolf 04:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- YES. This facility to be provided only for 3 years. Further, after 3 years also, if no one want to become a Administrator within the Project, then it means that there is no real responsible person in the project. So, if it happens like that then the project should be closed down and no help should be provided from outside the project. --TRYPPN 04:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- The proposal adequately addresses the main issues I had, and will result in large benefits for our smaller wikis. It should be implemented sooner rather than later. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 04:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Definite necessity for our smaller projects. –blurpeace (talk) 08:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- All help is welcome, and any project can opt-out if the community feels that they don't need (or want) it. –Ejs-80 08:38, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- A fine proposal in favor of our smaller wikis. IShadowed 08:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Per my comments at Talk:Global sysops. Tiptoety talk 09:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Those small projects would benefit a lot from this. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 09:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Long overdue --Herby talk thyme 11:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes BejinhanTalk 12:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- 3s 13:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- ZorroIII 13:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- LeinaD (t) 14:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC) cross-wiki patrollers are very helpful and part of them should have GS priviliges
- Ulflarsen 14:38, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Ellysse 15:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- You are ineligible to vote (registration before October 1, 2009 is required). vvvt 22:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Bjoertvedt 14:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Kjetil_r 16:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Would definitely be helpful. --Erwin 16:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- I'm a bit skeptical about global blocks, but the rest of the permissions seem fine. --FiliP ██ 16:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Same as dungy. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC) P.S.: Longer German explanation: w:de:Benutzer:DerHexer/Blog#Global_sysops
- Jon Harald Søby 16:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Multichill 17:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Atluxity 17:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- (moved vote) - Some users said vandalism etc. on small projects is a bigger problem than I thought. The proposal seems to be fine. Lolsimon 18:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Petter Bøckman 18:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Vigorous action 18:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Fruggo 18:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sustructu 19:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Please confirm that you are actually nl:User:Sustructu. vvvt 22:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sustructu 19:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Per Mike.lifeguard--Vito Genovese 20:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Coffee (talk) 20:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Seddon 20:56, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- iAlex 20:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Mezelf14 21:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- -- Prince Kassad 23:39, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- --DaB. 23:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC) Why not. As long as they don't interfere in middle and big wikis.
- --StG1990 23:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- -- smial 23:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 02:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- --ZaDiak 02:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- bibliomaniac15 02:25, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Cirt (talk) 06:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. Pmlineditor ∞ 07:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- -Harrywad 11:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- — putnik 12:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- --MF-W 13:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Cumulus 14:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Support lightening the load on stewards with this supporting role. ~ Ningauble 16:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Sounds good. Glacier Wolf 16:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- A333 19:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Peroxwhy2gen 08:46, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- EdBever 08:57, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Red 81 10:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Lampak 11:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think we have to help small projects, because they can’t help themselves and vandals can very easily kill them at the beginning of their ‘life’. Tajniak2 14:31, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Taketa 15:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Beany 23:49, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- MBisanz talk 01:31, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Robotje 09:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Mhaesen 11:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Good idea! Aku506 12:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Erik1980 13:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Herr Kriss 18:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- m:Mark W (Mwpnl) ¦ talk 19:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- ken123 19:26, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ency 19:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC) pl why not
- EMeczKa 20:02, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Merdis 20:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Aotearoa 20:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Trivelt 21:14, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Willking1979 01:50, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- RubiksMaster110 04:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- Angela 04:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- Phantomsteve 15:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- --The Evil IP address 22:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- Logan Talk Contributions 02:17, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- – Innv | d | s: 02:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Karol007 ✉ 02:53, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- -- Avi 04:09, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- - miya 06:02, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Bsadowski1 06:12, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- -- Razorflame 06:18, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Gdarin | talk 10:21, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Cycn 11:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Kaganer 13:26, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Diegusjaimes 14:58, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Jan eissfeldt 17:38, 6 January 2010 (UTC) of course
User:8BitHero 20:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)- ineligible to vote (not enough edits) James (T|C) 00:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Thunderhead 21:51, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
94.224.94.149 23:26, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Kafziel 01:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Taichi - (あ!) 01:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Frank 01:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- NativeForeigner 01:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Valicore 01:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)- ineligible to vote (not enough edits) James (T|C) 00:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Odehammar 01:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC) The stewards must need help, as this proposition has been made. Granting more users stewardship is complicated, as they are already too few. Ergo, this proposition seems to be a solution, at least for now.- Jeffwang16 01:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- ineligible (not enough edits) James (T|C) 01:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Addihockey10 01:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Stinging Swarm 01:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Emrahertr 01:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Geni 01:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- ZooPro 01:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Bradybd 01:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Please, this will be helpful. Ceranthor 01:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Andrew Petersen 17:54, 6 January 2010 (PST) Alright, then!- Ip vote, claimed account not eligible James (T|C) 01:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Guettarda 01:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Deehh 01:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)- User is ineligable (not enough edits) James (T|C) 01:30, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Support I see no reason why not, as along as the right people are chosen for the role. Argyle 4 Life 02:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- —§ stay (sic)! 02:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Syohei.A(talk) 02:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Blodance 02:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Saebjorn 02:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sander Fraga 02:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ryan Postlethwaite 02:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- oscar 02:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- DrNegative 02:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Maxima m 02:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Evalowyn 02:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Mind the gap 02:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Gravedig2 2:31 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- On en-wiki we have many admins that can quickly respond to problems. There are not nearly as many admins on other projects and there is huge potential for pressing matters to get incredibly backlogged. Having global admins will help alleviate this problem. Valley2city‽ 02:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Even the little projects should have people looking out for them. AP1787 02:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Tarheel95 02:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- As primarily an en user, and the only other language I understand is Malay, it is unlikely I will ever be involved in a project needing global sysops, but it sounds like it will be a good idea for those that need it Nil Einne 02:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Editor182 13:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
OurDigitalVision Please be more responsible
- I don't see why not. Bloodmerchant 03:01, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, but there is potential for serious misunderstandings caused by language issues Thparkth 03:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Yes Mimar77 03:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)- Darkbluesun 03:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC) As wiki gets bigger, this could be the answer to make sure the information stays accurate and clean. On the other hand, this move could seriously slow progress couldn't it? I'll have to trust the stewards. They do a lot of the dirty work.
- user ineligible (not enough edits) James (T|C) 02:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- billinghurst 03:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Absolutely.
- Carl 03:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Taweetham 03:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Commander Keane 03:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
This has tremendous potential to improve the capacity of smaller projects, and to encourage a sort of broad-based community. I look forward to seeing how this will operate Steve Joseph 03:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Perey 03:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Makes perfect sense to me. Clearly the stewards need the help, or else this would have been a non-proposal.
- This change is long overdue, as experience with chr wikipedia demonstrated a few years ago. Wikiacc (§) 03:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
iSquishy
- Yes. Teinesavaii 03:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Zwilson14 03:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Shooter16101 03:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. --The New Mikemoral 03:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- DerAndre 04:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Shivashree 04:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Calebrw 04:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, --Sarumo74 04:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC).
Mr. Anon515 04:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Bellayet 04:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Atu 04:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support As long as it's not abused, it's a good idea. For.--Maximz2005 04:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yk Yk Yk 04:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. Magnefl 04:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
--Fischy 04:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Terence 05:01, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. Logical proposal providing necessary help. Ezratrumpet 05:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Juan Miguel 05:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --J Hazard 05:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- If help is needed then we should help Chaosdruid 05:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. We need a way to quickly stop vandalism. Eric Scubeesnax 05:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. Seablade 05:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Jamesjiao 05:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Yes Noraft 05:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Alvaro qc 05:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Yes --Delivi 05:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Because the projects are allowed to opt-out. -- kh80 05:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support. It is very good idea. Mondalor 05:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Geanixx 05:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support I think it goes without saying that Global sysops should be chosen very carefully from a pool of multi-lingual users with considerable experience in several different wiki's. Considering the brutal scrutiny local sysops candidates undergo, I don't think quality control and carefree sysopsing on a global scale is a concern. Angrysockhop 06:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support IlyaHaykinson 06:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Aldo samulo 06:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Nixón 06:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support The wikis that are this small need the extra help, and as long as the Global sysops are picked carefully, I think that the idea is an excellent way to make sure they get that help. Trinity507 06:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support IVP 06:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --84.60.37.89 06:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 06:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Labant 06:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Kv75 06:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support'd. perhaps wikis on external sites elect to be included in this list, if they feel that they would be better off with the aid of these obviously-ver--Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 08:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)y-qualified editors. I assume wikis about specific topics are not under Wikimedia's administration, but if they are being overrun with vandals or have administrators fighting, these sites could issue a metaphorical call for help through whatever medium we set up. The next version of the wiki software could include a tag of whether or not to allow these people power, and they (the external wikis) could add themselves to the privilege list. Sompm 06:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support--Shizhao 06:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Heiko 06:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hohohob 07:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support - Wysprgr2005 07:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Djlordi 07:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Supportמתניה 07:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Dovi 07:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Caponer 07:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support CaribDigita 07:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC) I read through many of the "No"s and I believe Global sysops might be able to guide new upstart projects in the right direction until they get more established. As it was stated, if it just simply deleted because it is small, then nothing new will ever obtain the chance to become firmly established.
Support seems to be a good idea, to support understaffed wikis --Nickaat 08:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Kimchi.sg 08:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support - seems like a good idea--Pianoplonkers 08:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support CntRational 08:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Sure.
Support --Petri 08:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support - if a project still has the right to decide if global sysops should have admin rights in their project, then yes. Cavernia 08:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Clamiax 09:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Great idea! —what a crazy random happenstance 08:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --DS-fax 08:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support +1 I think that this would avoid SURP and other cross wikis problems. --Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 08:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Merlissimo 08:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support In the early stage of the project, someone who don't know project's language may get admin right for maintenance. After the project grow enough, that admin right might be questioned by newcomers, as they don't have neither consensus nor RfA. Global sysop can avoid those situation, I think. If it was mandatory for all project, I might say No. --Peremen 08:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Kenrick95 08:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Wvk 08:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Treublatt 08:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support VMS Mosaic 08:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Lutz Terheyden 08:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Faizhaider 08:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support, I like this idea. --Mercy 09:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Ragimiri 09:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support good idea for small projects --Tlusťa 09:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Reduction of Steward - workload by distributing "simple" admin tasks on adminless wikis. --Guandalug 09:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support While I have grave reservations about adding in extra levels of hierarchy (K.I.S.S.), after carefully reading through this I can see the point of it so I support it. Mathmo 09:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Vigilius 09:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support - Very efficient way to improove the organization of "understaffed" projects. Leujohn (talk) 09:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support I have personally been part of many small-languages Wikipedias where a shortage of admins doing trivial (ie. non-controversial) tasks has slowed the project's growth. DaGizza 09:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Euku 09:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Fschubert 09:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Weak support. Generally a good idea but I have a queasy feeling about global blocks. According to Global blocking, such blocks would extend to all WMF wikis, even those outside the global sysop scope. Which is OK as long as a global sysop's main task is combatting massive blatant vandalism on very small projects, so I'd say give the proposal a try and see how it works out.--GrafZahl (talk) 10:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Makes sense. rursus 10:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Klaus Eifert 10:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Yes/Kyllä --Jepse 10:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Seems sensibly bounded by parameters. --Dweller 10:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support--Rsmn 10:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- {{Support} --Harald Haugland 10:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Very sensible idea for projects just getting started. --Clarince63 10:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Wedderkop 10:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Great idea. Pitke 10:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support A well-thought-out way to give small wikis the boost they need to get their act together. Freederick 10:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support A Very Good Thing, especially for the small wikis, especially since any that wish to opt out can do so. Andrew Dalby 10:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Seems like a good idea. Alan16 10:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support A stimulating way to get admins of small wiki's who don't want to be "overruled" to do their work. Rmeoung 11:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support I like the idea very much that small projects get more help in the beginning and can more easily grow. :-) There are so many languages in this world, we don't have just these few that have already a Wikipedia. --Geitost diskusjon 11:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Sahmeditor 11:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support ThorJH 11:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Razimantv 11:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support There seem to be enough restrictions, like ability of projects to opt out that I think there are enough checks that this will be net good. Jbolden1517 11:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support notafish }<';> 11:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --თოგო (D) 11:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Support blindspots can create significant problems for the project as a whole. SamJohnston 11:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Working on a small wiki myself I can see this being something of a Godsend for most. Garden 11:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Daniel (‽) 11:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Seems good to me. I am a Sysop on the Wikis I have, I know how hard it is to keep them "clean" Knee427 11:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Absolutley WilliamF1two 11:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support I agree with the folks who say that a small wiki without enough admins shouldn't be shut down. It may someday grow into something great. JulieSpaulding 11:59, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support. The ability to hit vandals across the various language wikipedias will be a net positive. Mjroots 12:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC) ( Admin Mjroots on en.wiki)
Support. Very useful for our job at SWMT. --Lucien leGrey (m · es) 12:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support we'll be very useful for the little project (even on the french wikisource, we're short of admin sometimes !). Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 12:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --ThT 12:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Vladimir.frolov 12:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --alexscho 12:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Tomatoman 12:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Trdsf 12:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support--Cyrillic 12:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Seems like a good idea.
- --Nemo 12:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Mheart 12:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Pitlane02 12:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Doktorbuk 12:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- ⇦REDVERS⇨ 13:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --BokicaK 13:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support - As much as I despise most of the janitors on the English Wikipedia, I do recognize that their existance is necessary. This proposal seems perfectly rational and unlikely to cause strife for the small projects it will effect given its opt-out clause. Nutiketaiel 13:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support - While it would probably be preferable to have a larger, more active stewards corp (which if it existed would negate the need for this proposal), we don't. Chrism 13:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support - Proposal seems rational and for the betterment of the entire Wiki community. --Mwilso24 13:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support J-L Cavey 13:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support I agree, small wiki have problems to get sysop. Vasiľ 13:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Will help us get at cross-wiki vandals who use small wikis to create malicious accounts. NawlinWiki 13:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support 194.41.152.158 13:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- IP ineligible to vote. John Vandenberg 02:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Muro de Aguas 13:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Tostan 13:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Conaughy 13:59, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support I think this is a good way to improve small wikis -- HF cars and sets 14:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Good idea. Raychut 14:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. Tgkprog 14:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. Swatjester 14:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Evet! --Goktr001 14:12, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support I support. Albertus Aditya 14:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Linedwell@frwiki 14:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --FischX 14:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support--VincenzoX 14:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --амдф 14:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --TheGrimReaper NS 14:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Sanbec 15:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support A sensible extra layer of defense against mass vandalism attacks. Durova 15:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Frank schubert 15:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support I have no reason not to vote on this good idea... A idea that helps wikipedia, why don't vote? SunProj3cT 15:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support -- small wikis need some help. Renata3 15:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Taking a hit for the little guy sounds good to me. Neelix 15:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sandstein 15:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support. Since trust is not a matter of languages -- Vwm 15:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Christian Giersing 15:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Don't agree with the silly support templates but chalk this up as a support Spartaz 15:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Engelbaet 15:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support IF handled with care, it's worth a try. Especially potentially useful for small Wikip-projects --ArchiSchmedes Talk 15:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support for small wikis only, where stewards were (and still currently are, I suppose) performing such anti-vandalism tasks. --Paginazero - Ø 15:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --ゆきち 15:59, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support This is an important tool to help moribund languages or ones whose users are not very net-savvy to get a leg up. Warmest Regards, :)—thecurran Speak your mind my past 16:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Carolfrog 16:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Neeters 16:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Juliabackhausen 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support -- zur887 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Morten Haan 16:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support robaco 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Lépton ✉ 16:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Transmissionelement 16:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support 16:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Sensible approach to solving a real problem. FloNight 16:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --TheBestPilarYouWillEverSee 16:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support –neurovelho 16:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support. JamieS93 16:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Kubłok31 16:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support /Poxnar 16:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Tpt 16:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Tuvalkin 17:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Hosiryuhosi 17:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --FlügelRad 17:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Fantastic idea, as long as they are not annoying and act "the hard man". Conay 17:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Anthony Ivanoff 17:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support this idea. Actually it has already been tested in Wikia (helpers), and it works. Wassily Steik 17:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Hrcolyer 17:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Catherine 17:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Jyka 19:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support With caution, as per Kimdino. — OwenBlacker (Talk) 17:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Kaldari 17:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Arkuat 17:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC) The opt-out by local consensus is very important to me; it looks as if a project with 10 administrators, 3 of whom are active at any given time, can opt-out by consensus. Otherwise I wouldn't support.
- Laser brain 17:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Ateria 17:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Braveheart09 17:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support The Anome 17:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Migt be useful for small african wikis JAn Dudík 17:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Will be good for smaller Wikis. But let´s see if is it working or not. --Chmee2 17:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support SBC-YPR 17:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --DieBuche 18:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Why not? Clearly, many smaller projects need this. Innotata 18:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Stefaniak 18:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support. -AlexSm 18:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support --M/ 18:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Rajiv Varma 18:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Amrum 18:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Very yes. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 18:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Pattiz 18:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Yo creo que esto es algo bueno para la wiki ya que hay muchos vandalos--Moms10 19:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Cocoaguytalkcontribs‽ 19:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Krdan 19:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Raysonho 19:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Toobaz 19:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Dunshocking 19:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Happy to support the majority vote; thanks for the vote!
- --Thalan
- Seems useful. No such power than stewards --Sargoth 19:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Sebk. 19:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Amir E. Aharoni 19:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Izno 19:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Skamecrazy123 19:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support - Eric-Wester 19:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Cozzycovers 19:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Good idea. I believe it can help the projects. --egg 19:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Seems a good idea - Lnegro 20:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support I wonder about knowledge about local languages (and of the sustainability of a project with less than 10 admins over the long term). There are good practical reasons stated in the oppose section below (such as the need for global admins to exercise sensitivity with respect to allowing smaller wiki to develop autonomously) but in essence this seems quite practical. --rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid (coṁrá) 20:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support - Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) 20:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support GameOn 20:12, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support - Armageddon11 20:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support - Rainmonger 20:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support I think this will be a very helpful position for developing the smaller Wikipedia projects and it seems like very little harm can come from this, so I support it. I Feel Tired 20:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Alterego 20:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support – ClockworkSoul 20:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC): This seems like a good idea in principle, and I'll be interested to see how it develops.
- Shii 20:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Osd@ruwiki 20:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Philippe 20:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Enemenemu 20:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Looks like a solution for a problem
Support Sole Soul 21:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --AFBorchert 21:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC) I assume that small wikis will profit from this solution. Most vandalisms or spam postings are in English or other major languages, not necessarily in the language of the small wikis. Similarly, copyright violations can be in many cases handled without knowing the wiki's language.
Support – Lumos3 21:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Small Wikis need the protection of the whole community or they may be vunerable to disruption which in turn will reflect on the reputation of the whole of Wikipedia.
Support Gkarpljuk 22:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Wikipedia is big; around 3 million articles by 20 million users. However lots of the amount is vandalism which should be reduced if the idea comes true. Jeremjay24 21:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Pschemp 21:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Knuddel8 22:21, 7 January 2010 (CET) I support that. I don't think the volunteers will abuse their rights and I don't think that their will be any volunteers chosen who aren't serious enough.
Support Absolute power corrupts absolutely; it's a Good Thing this isn't absolute power. Dhatfield 21:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support IzzyReal We as a collective entity need to protect the smaller articles. So Heck yeah!
Support --Dreaven3 21:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --cslatlantis 16:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC) Totally great idea. Too many people have been screwing up the facts.
Support --Gereon K. 21:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Daemorris 21:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Ding1dong 21:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support As long as we are admitting that this is a work around until the smaller wikis can better handle the scourge of internet flaming. I think that inter-wiki cooperation is part of the core of the Wikipedia spirit.--Adam in MO Talk 21:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support --Abaumg 21:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Nbarth 21:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Unusual? Quite TalkQu 22:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support - Vinvlugt 22:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support - Kaltxì Na'vi! 22:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- You are ineligible to vote (registration before October 1, 2009 is required). --Church of emacs talk 23:32, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Sounds interesting and worth a go. DD2K 22:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support -- All Wikipedias bear the same logo, while quality is varying. Global sysops can support the local stewarts, esp. blocking of vandals etc. -- Vertigo Man-iac 22:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support – This sounds like a very good idea. We desperately need more structures for inter-wiki communication and coordination, as well as filling a role that the stewards are unable to manage through shortage of numbers. I would be keen to see proposals for meetings of the GSs every ?three months or so, possibly with the stewards. Tony1 22:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support I like this idea --Adrille 22:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)