Stewards/Elections 2024/Votes/~aanzx
 |
The 2024 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted. |
~aanzx talk • contribs • accounts (stalktoy) • globalcontribs • confirm eligibility — Translate: translation help, statement, template
- Languages: kn-4, hi-2, en-3
- Personal info: (English)Hello i am Anoop, admin on Kannada wikipedia, I am applying to express my interest in contributing as a volunteer for Wikimedia as a steward. have actively engaged with various wikimedia communities, I am eager to extend my involvement and support to existing stewards. The reason why I am applying for stewards user group is to represent Indian languages within the Wikimedia Steward User Group is vital for fostering inclusivity and accessibility across the diverse linguistic landscape. I would also like to effectively advocate for the inclusion of Indian language content on Wikimedia platforms, support language-specific projects, and address the unique challenges faced by Indian language contributors in general.
- Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2024/Questions#~aanzx
Yes
[edit]
- Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • User says that they want to focus on India, which I think is fine. I know stewards are supposed to be global but India is a billion people and underserved with admin support so I do not share others' concern about limited scope. I acknowledge concerns that this candidate has less experience compared to others, but in my judgement, user meets satisfactory standard. I would not want all stewards so inexperienced but okay to have 1-2 newer users on the team, especially from underrepresented regions and language communities. Bluerasberry (talk) 15:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- M4tinbeigi (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • Rick Sanchez (talk) 16:06, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- DimensionalFusion (Eligible, checked by Ferien) • DimensionalFusion (talk) 20:41, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- UA0Volodymyr (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga) • UA0Volodymyr (talk) 03:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sebastian Wallroth (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon) • Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ulricus Angelus (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6) • Ulricus Angelus (talk) 16:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Perrak (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • Perrak (talk) 11:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by Tmv) • Good luck! Have a good year! Nurtenge (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • Filipović Zoran (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Nskjnv (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon) • Nskjnv (talk) 14:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • Miniapolis 16:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- S60W79 (Eligible, checked by Mykola7) • --S60W79 (talk) 22:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Jusjih (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • Jusjih (talk) 04:33, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Medhi jyoti (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11) • Medhi jyoti (talk) 06:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- NoychoH (Eligible, checked by Mykola7) • NoychoH (talk) 17:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11) • Bluerasberry has an excellent point. Natuur12 (talk) 19:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Fredericknoronha (Eligible, checked by Elton) • My support goes to you. Do something good if possible. Fredericknoronha (talk) 20:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Bio06940 (Eligible, checked by Elton) • Bio06940 (talk) 00:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Nattes à chat (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) • okay to have 1-2 newer users on the team, especially from underrepresented regions and language communities Nattes à chat (talk) 23:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
No
[edit]
- Giraffer (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • Per [1]. An inability to detect spam, or a willingness to allow it (see JBW's comment) is a major red flag. Giraffer (talk) 14:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for voting Giraffer, The deletion review article you linked above i still do not consider it spam or atleast do not qualify for w:Wikipedia:G11, as it was created by who 13 years experience on wikipedia, furthermore it was written in neutral point of view considering same article on knwiki.~aanzx ✉ © 05:04, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Stïnger (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • His statement suggests that he will only be involved in indian-related events and not even understanding what is the Stewards' role. I also would like to see more experience. --Stïnger （会話） 14:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ján Kepler (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • I don't see enough cross-wiki activity for a steward. I would probably support a global rollback/sysop. Ján Kepler (talk) 14:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- LR0725 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • Limited xwiki experience at Wikimedia. Sorry, but as you said you have lots of experience at external wikis, it will be great when you try next time after making some more activities at Wikimedia. LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 14:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- TenWhile6 (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • Limited crosswiki experience TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 14:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Fenikals (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • Fenikals (talk) 14:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Stemoc (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • too in-experienced, start small, 2 year account, won't trust accounts under 8 years.. Stemoc 14:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • Unconvincing answers to the questions asked. Sorry. JavaHurricane 15:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • While it's OK to focus on Indic wikis, your answers are unfortunately rather weak (with allowances given for language weaknesses). "My crosswiki activity is less, as i use wikimedia when needed only" is a problematic answer, because that sounds like an inactive steward to me. If you're planning to focus on the anti-vandalism track, it's reasonable to expect you to have some experience with it (and there are many ways for you to get involved with it). "request such on SRP while granting user a user right should apply common sense while giving rights to user who have more good faith edits" - the problem with this is that MVR is generally definite and there isn't much manoeuvre that you can make in general (most others managed to make this point). "Relations with small wikis" - it's a bit odd to refer people to GSR when the context is such that you can do it yourself. "Emergency de-sysop" - your answer to that was quite weird and the link you gave was inappropriate. Put it this way - one or two weak answers isn't a big deal, but yours unfortunately fell below the threshold I look for. I do hope that you take some time gaining experience and reading the documentation, and hopefully do better in a future application. Leaderboard (talk) 15:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your vote and input, Yes I agree with you that many of my answer have been misleading to you but I thought answers given by me were ok, I will try again to answer to questions above.
- crosswiki activity: though I said my crosswiki activity is less that doesn't mean I am not active at all , I am active on few wikis every day which i regularly moniter. Also my point for not working on crosswiki through swviewer is that I am that many times I am proficient in many languages, for example on working on swviewer is if a user is reverting a edit on page which was previously vandalised if they do not have any clue if they do not have understanding of content reverting would probably be waste of time.
- focus on Indic wikis: i aware in some cases i can't act on wikis which i consider home wikis due to conflict of interest, my answer for focus on Indic wikis only meant representation, not meant that I am limited only to work on issues regarding Indic wikis.
- MVR , common sense: i would like to explain that my point was to apply common sense on such occasions is that MVR is not definite where per policies a steward should not supposed to be overriding community consensus, but for request on small wikis if requestor is applying for permanent admin rights, there are assigned temporary rights citing MVR, this is where I assume I should be using common sense while granting user right considering facts such as local consensus, long standing good faith user.
- relationship with small wikis: I meant to say that I would forward such requests to other groups such as GSR when I not sure if I could complete myself, on that question i didn't know that context is such that you can do it myself, though I thought I had explained it well.
- I understand your points about conveying my answer well, so didn't respond to your points sooner, hopefully this reply clears things i failed explain in Stewards/Elections 2024/Questions a bit.~aanzx ✉ © 04:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- @~aanzx:, see Talk:Stewards/Elections 2024/Votes/~aanzx for my response. Leaderboard (talk) 08:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your vote and input, Yes I agree with you that many of my answer have been misleading to you but I thought answers given by me were ok, I will try again to answer to questions above.
- JrandWP (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • Still a red flag, wait for 1-2 years for more xwiki experience. JrandWP (talk) 15:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Mehman (Eligible, checked by Yahya) • "The reason why I am applying for stewards user group is to represent Indian languages within the Wikimedia Steward User Group" - sorry, but this is not a rational reason to apply for or become a steward. Mehman 15:36, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Prodraxis (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • Too inexperienced. Prodraxis (talk) 15:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- SHB2000 (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • User thinks experience on fandom wikis count... SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 16:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Maximillion Pegasus (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • First, I'd like to thank the candidate for volunteering to be part of the steward team. I do have some concerns about the user's understanding of the steward role and why he wants to be a steward/how he intends to help out. That, combined with his low cross-wiki experience and lack of other global roles, leads me to an oppose. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 16:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Minilammas (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • --Minilammas (talk) 16:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • Missing cross-wiki experience Ameisenigel (talk) 16:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Eta Carinae (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • Eta Carinae (talk) 17:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- V0lkanic (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon) • Low cross-wiki experience, insufficient reasoning for the candidacy. V0lkanic (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Funkruf (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon) • Please increase your contribution in cross-wikis. Your experience is still too limited. Funkruf (talk) 17:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 17:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon) • Needs (more) cross-wiki and/or global activity and experience. Novak Watchmen (talk) 17:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- MdsShakil (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • —MdsShakil (talk) 18:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Pppery (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • * Pppery * it has begun 19:37, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Enkhsaihan2005 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6) • Enkhsaihan2005 (talk) 20:55, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by JrandWP) • ToBeFree (talk) 23:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- USSR-Slav (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11) •
USSR-Slav (talk) 02:36, 7 February 2024 (UTC) - Ruy (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11) • Not enough crosswiki experience, maybe next time. Ruy (talk) 03:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Minorax (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • Don't see enough crosswiki experience to be a steward. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:47, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by SHB2000) • Not enough crosswiki experience. Rzuwig► 10:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Tmv (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • As SHB2000 says, experience on outside wikis does not help much, and generally this is common for GR and GS as well. You can take some steps before coming here. Tmv (talk) 11:02, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Lookruk (Eligible, checked by Tmv) • --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 12:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) • cyrfaw (talk) 13:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Jeffrey Beall (Eligible, checked by Giraffer) • Jeffrey Beall (talk) 16:47, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Wooze (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6) • . Wooze (talk) 17:03, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Wutsje (Eligible, checked by Ferien) • Needs more cross-wiki experience. Wutsje (talk) 19:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Nguyentrongphu (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) • Clueless candidate sadly. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 00:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Bernanke's Crossbow (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) • Candidacy seems focused on activism, rather than WikiGnoming. Bernanke's Crossbow (talk) 00:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga) • dwadieff ✉ 03:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga) • ミラP@Miraclepine 03:51, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hehua (Eligible, checked by JrandWP) • Hehua (talk) 12:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Alphama (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6) • A l p h a m a Talk 15:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6) • Multiple reasons. Unconvincing question answers. Insufficient cross wiki experience. Bizarre views on spam per User:JBW. ——SerialNumber54129 19:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- JBW (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6) • Above (timestamp 05:04, 7 February 2024 (UTC)) the candidate wrote "still do not consider it spam or atleast do not qualify for w:Wikipedia:G11, as it was created by who 13 years experience on wikipedia, furthermore it was written in neutral point of view considering same article on knwiki". It's not totally clear what that was intended to mean, but it appears to indicate that the candidate thinks (a) that whether something is spam depends on how long the editor who posted it has been here, and (2) whether an article on one Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view can somehow be determined by looking at another article on the same subject on another Wikpedia. Having a steward with such astonishing misunderstandings as those would be disastrous. JBW (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your vote, I think you misunderstood what I said above, but again I would like to say it again that both articles were English Wikipedia and Kannada Wikipedia were written by same user who have 13years experience and very active on Wikimedia and wrote that article in neutral point of view, @JBW: on every queries regarding that page I asked deleting admin & on deletion review page to explain how that page is spam for which I didn't get any response. instead of telling me that the article is spam, please tell me how it is spam so that i can understand how that page is spam.~aanzx ✉ © —Preceding undated comment added 23:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC).
- You seem to be missing the point. If you can't understand why editors considered it spam, then you would not be able to perform the job of a steward. JBW (talk) 15:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your vote, I think you misunderstood what I said above, but again I would like to say it again that both articles were English Wikipedia and Kannada Wikipedia were written by same user who have 13years experience and very active on Wikimedia and wrote that article in neutral point of view, @JBW: on every queries regarding that page I asked deleting admin & on deletion review page to explain how that page is spam for which I didn't get any response. instead of telling me that the article is spam, please tell me how it is spam so that i can understand how that page is spam.~aanzx ✉ © —Preceding undated comment added 23:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC).
- Thastp (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • Thastp (talk) 11:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga) • Ferran Mir (talk) 12:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Jan Myšák (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • Jan Myšák (talk) 14:55, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Justarandomamerican (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon) • Justarandomamerican (talk) 16:52, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Victor Schmidt (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11) • mostly per Leaderboard. I sense a language barrier. I don't get why they think fandom experience can be transferred. Victor Schmidt (talk) 18:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Bencemac (Eligible, checked by NightWolf1223) • Bencemac (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- EggRoll97 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • Very little cross-wiki experience. EggRoll97 (talk) 02:13, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Roundish (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • Roundish (talk) 02:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- ChrisWx (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • Per above opposes. ChrisWx 🌀 (talk - contribs) 04:17, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 04:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- SMcCandlish (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu) • Insufficient cross-wiki experience, and the candidate statement reads like an activism/advocacy piece about India and Indian languages, which really has nothing to do with the steward role. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 10:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- DCB (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • DCB (talk) 12:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Kadı (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon) • Kadı Message 13:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Lemonaka (Eligible, checked by Tmv) • Lemonaka (talk) 14:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sumeor 29567 (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga) • Sumeor 29567 (talk) 21:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga) • Centaur271188 (talk) 22:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Cremastra (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6) • 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 22:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- K6ka (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 23:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hamid Hassani (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11) • Per above. Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- DynamicFolklore (Eligible, checked by Mykola7) • I agree with the others. Folklorelet`s Talk! 11:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Mykola7) • Gereon K. (talk) 12:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ankry (Eligible, checked by Mykola7) • Ankry (talk) 13:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ultratomio (Eligible, checked by Mykola7) • Ultratomio (talk) 23:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Em-mustapha (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • Em-mustapha talk 11:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Drummingman (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6) • Drummingman (talk) 16:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • Lepricavark (talk) 15:37, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Fastily (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) • per above, concerns with judgement and limited overall experience Fastily 23:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- SunDawn (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Nastoshka (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt) • rather unconvincing answers and I fear the candidate has not really understood the role / responsibilities of a steward Nastoshka (talk) 21:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Saroj (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt) • Saroj (talk) 09:15, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Brewster239 (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt) • Brewster239 (T·C·CA) 09:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Daniuu (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • Daniuu (talk) 16:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Intothatdarkness (Eligible, checked by Elton) • Intothatdarkness (talk) 18:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sleyece (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11) • Sleyece (talk) 01:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Aizenr (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • Aizenr (talk) 06:26, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ideophagous (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • Ideophagous (talk) 17:25, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Paradise Chronicle (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) • Didn't provide a diff to his claims. As to me not suited for the steward position. —Preceding undated comment added 21:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC).
- NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) • NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 00:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) • In addition to concerns expressed above, particularly those about spam, the lack of cross-wiki experience is a complete dealbreaker. While I'm all about inclusivity, diversity, and representation, that alone cannot be a rationale for electing a steward; they must still show they are competent in basic steward duties like spam identification. The candidate is encouraged to first participate in SWMT or other cross-wiki processes and reapply in at least two years. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- ZERTINHO (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11) • ZERTINHO (talk) 06:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Vp08122010 (Eligible, checked by Elton) • Unconvincing question answers. Insufficient cross wiki experience.VP PRM VIR💬📝 16:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Mirer (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • Mirer (talk) 21:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Spielvogel (Eligible, checked by Mykola7) • a little more experience would be appropriate Spielvogel (talk) 20:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
-
Giorgos456(Not eligible, checked by Elton) • Not enough cross-wiki experience Giorgos456 (talk) 02:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Jalapeño (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • // 🌶️Jalapeño🌶️ Don't click this link! 15:04 12:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Antoine.b (Eligible, checked by SHB2000) • Antoine.b (talk) 12:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by Stïnger) • PoetVeches (talk) 16:14, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- NgocAnMaster (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • As you have limited x-wiki experience and little understandings of how the real stewards work, I have to vote No for you. Anster (talk) 13:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
-
Buffs(Not eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) • Buffs per failure to respond to the question posed about arwiki (talk) 19:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Z1KA (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon) • Z1KA (T) 17:38, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- ドラみそ (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) • doramiso-meta (talk) 01:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Elton) • BrunoBoehmler (talk) 20:34, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger) • DannyS712 (talk) 23:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Albertoleoncio (Eligible, checked by Superpes15) • Not yet. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 12:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Base (Eligible, checked by Superpes15) • Base (talk) 13:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- HarleyQuinn (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon) • HarleyQuinn❤️ (talk) 13:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Neutral
[edit]
- Aspere (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • Aspere (talk) 14:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ferien (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony) • Moral support, I think you should come back to run again in a few years time once you have gained more experience. I'd rather not pile-on oppose. --Ferien (talk) 16:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- DarkMatterMan4500 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 19:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Red-tailed hawk (Eligible, checked by Ferien) • The user brings language skills to the table that the Stewards presently lack, and the user seems to be really involved and trusted in the Kannada Wikimedia community. But I'm just not seeing enough experience across the projects in a broad way just yet. I think this is a situation where you will make a good Steward, but the level of experience is not quite there yet. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- DreamRimmer (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11) • – DreamRimmer (talk) 03:35, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Queen of Hearts (Eligible, checked by Yahya) • Queen of Hearts (talk) 05:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (Eligible, checked by Mykola7) • Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (talk) 08:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Andrew Pertsev (Eligible, checked by Mykola7) • Andrew Pertsev (talk) 08:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) • Richardkiwi (talk) 13:00, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) • per Red-tailed hawk. CptViraj (talk) 13:54, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6) • Moral support from me. Good language support, but lacks experience in general. Account is too new for me, will encourage running again after accumulating more xwiki experience. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:37, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Neriah (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga) • Neriah - 💬 - 21:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Daniel Mietchen (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) • Daniel Mietchen (talk) 22:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga) • Tvcccp (talk) 07:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Lionel Cristiano (Eligible, checked by Yahya) • Lionel Cristiano (talk) 20:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by NightWolf1223) • Dostojewskij (talk) 21:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) • ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (talk) 07:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Styyx (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon) • Styyx (talk) 16:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Denis Barthel (Eligible, checked by Mykola7) • It seems to me that there is some experience and clarity about the steward role lacking still, thus I am here. I would like to encourage ~aanzx though to return in a later election as I see a lot of good will and ambition here. Denis Barthel (talk) 12:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Weltenspringerin (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon) • Weltenspringerin (talk) 15:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Adtonko (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • Adtonko (talk) 11:39, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Elli (Eligible, checked by Giraffer) • Elli (talk) 15:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) • Wolverène (talk) 08:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6) • Laurent Jerry (talk) 16:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Zivax (Eligible, checked by JrandWP) • Zivax (talk) 13:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- 용인 학생 (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • ㅡ Joayong (Suggest) 14:23, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Jphwra (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • Jphwra (talk) 11:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • Per others that invited ~aanzx to gain experience and try again in the future. Harlock81 (talk) 12:03, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Masti (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • masti <talk> 16:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Prairie Astronomer (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • Prairie Astronomer (talk) 17:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Kreuz Elf (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11) • Kreuz Elf (talk) 17:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • Not enough experience and cross-wiki activity is low Meiræ 18:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Xania (Eligible, checked by SHB2000) • Xania (talk) 09:14, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11) • Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:25, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- FlyingAce (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) • –FlyingAce✈hello 20:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by CptViraj) • Berlin-George (talk) 03:49, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Vít Karásek (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • Vít Karásek (talk) 13:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Nicolas Eynaud (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) • Nicolas Eynaud (talk) 14:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Draken Bowser (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • Moral support and per Red-tailed hawk Draken Bowser (talk) 14:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Eraevsky (Eligible, checked by Julius 12345) • Eraevsky (обс.) 15:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- DraconicDark (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil) • Language skills are a positive, but could use more cross-wiki experience. DraconicDark (talk) 18:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Mykola7) • Maleine258 (talk) 21:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- AdaHephais (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • AdaHephais (talk) 12:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • Darkhan 10:41, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- M7 (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) • M/ (talk) 13:23, 27 February 2024 (UTC)