Jump to content

Stewards/confirm/2010/ja

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards‎ | confirm‎ | 2010
日本語:

2010-11年度スチュワード信任投票は2月7日開始、2月28日終了です。

2010-11年度スチュワード信任投票は、現在のスチュワードたちに私たちが今も満足しているかどうかを確認するよい機会です。この信任作業を出来る限り円滑に進めるため、以下の点にご留意ください。

意見を述べるには、2010年2月1日より前に(姉妹ウィキを含め)編集実績のある利用者名で、ログインしてください。2010年選任投票受付期間に、もし下記にリストアップされた現在のスチュワードに対する不満がおありでしたら、その旨明記し、不満の理由をお書きください。たとえば活動していないとか、問題行動があるといったことなどです。活動のないスチュワードは steward policies に明記されているように、スチュワード権限を失います。

信任投票の終わりに、現在のスチュワードと新しく信任されたスチュワードはこのページに記された苦情を考慮し、コミュニティからのコメントとスチュワードとしての見解また仕事についての理解の双方に基づき、必要と判断された場合にスチュワード権限を取り除きます。すべてのスチュワードは信任投票ごとにこの過程を経て考査されます。

こちらもご覧下さい:


Purge the cache of this page?

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

日本語:
  • 言語: pt, es-2, en-2, gl-2
  • 候補者の情報: 昨年の選挙でスチュワードに選任頂き、主に SRP の依頼を扱っています。今年は一層ウィキ・プロジェクト群に貢献したいと思います。有難うございます。

Comments about Alexanderps

[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

日本語:
  • 言語: nl, en, de...
  • 候補者の情報: 最近はあまり活動できませんでした。正直申し上げて、状況は当分変わりそうにありません。少なすぎるとのご批判は甘受します。まだ信頼は頂いていると思いますし、ほんの少しの活動でも、ほんの少しはお役に立てているかと思います。量は僅かかもしれませんが、その中で最善を尽くすことをお誓いします。

Comments about Andre Engels

[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

日本語:
  • 言語: fr, en
  • 候補者の情報: 対象者より: こんにちは。昨年はごく僅かしかスチュワードとして活動できませんでしたが、スチュワード権限を維持したいと思っています。専門研究の立ち上げに手を取られ、スチュワードとしてはごく限られた活動しかできていません。しかし、活動への熱意は(支部活動が中心ではありますが)変わりません。活動量が少な過ぎて解任され得ることは重々(残念ながら :))承知していますが、続投させて頂ければ幸いです。

Comments about Anthere

[edit]
  • I count two steward actions within the last year. If this is true, I respectfully move to remove as inactive per policy, though she's still quite a valued Wikimedian. The foundation is encouraged to add Anthere to an internally-run group (such as Staff) if an exception is warranted. If there are more than ten actions (and I may well be missing some, such as deletion review) please let me know so I can modify this opinion. Kylu 02:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unfortunately, inactive. Pmlineditor  07:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Inactive. --WizardOfOz talk 10:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove, sorry, but only 2 steward actions after last confirmation. —Innv {ru-ws} 10:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Inactive. Doesn't need the tools -> remove. -Barras talk 11:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hardly any activity, so I'm afraid I must say remove. I do agree with Lar about benefiting from your expertise, but I think you simply are too inactive. (Especially if Kylu's right about the two steward actions.) --Erwin 14:07, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Perhaps we need a "steward emeritus" role, folk who left without controversy/in good standing, and who can still stay on the mailing list so we can benefit from their insight and advice, but who no longer have the bit itself? ++Lar: t/c 14:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I like that idea. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 14:48, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Me too. I'd like to add that Angela and Anthere were only active in the earliest days and their memory and experience is valuable. --Aphaia 12:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • inactive - so adios! We have too little active Stewarts but so much users think beacuase of Stewards like you we have enough. Marcus Cyron 17:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • she told she wants to be active but she couldn't find anything to do , anyway i would be happy to see you as a active steward but till then i have to say remove --Mardetanha talk 17:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Basically inactive. Rights are granted for the benefit of the community, when they ceased to be used to any degree they can be removed --Herby talk thyme 09:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • totally inactive, remove (sadly) --FiliP ██ 11:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral. Obelix 11:45, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • spectacular person who has given a lot to the foundation and its projects (and likely will continue to do so). However, it appears that she doesn't really need the tools and I would tend to say it is better to remove them for now. James (T C) 23:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Inactive, remove. Razorflame 07:16, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep - Waerth 16:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC) - After everything Anthere has done this is the way she gets treated? Everyone should be ashamed of themselves![reply]
  • Keep, I'm sure we can find work for her. bastique demandez! 23:28, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep - my view in general is that keeping onboard trustworthy people who have for some time been less active but are willing to continue using steward tools even when used very sparingly, will eventually lead to a greater evolutionary diversity in the stewards group. such diversity is essential, not only of talents or knowledge, but also variety of experience and number of years of service. with all respect, we don't want a uniform group of hyperactives solely, nor is there need of an overthrow of some sort of government, there is none here, since stewards do not rule. so let's keep such experience onboard where we can. in my philosophy, extended-rights communities should always be kept growing on a healthy wiki. please stay onboard by being/becoming sufficiently active (see current policy which sets the limits, but can use some updating as well imo). the case of anthere is special as well, and i know from experience how energy and time-consuming wmf board-work is, and that one really needs time to recover and pick up old and new routines and work again. oscar 00:43, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep - turstworthy enough -- ※   JéRRy   ┼   雨雨   ※  16:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • if outside life is the priority, make it so, revel in that, the requirement of stewardship is to have a requisite level of activity to meet the needs of the community. The only person who can tell us whether that is capable of being fulfilled is the steward. If you think that what you do matters, and meets the requirement, then you have my support to continue. billinghurst sDrewth 13:31, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep -FASTILY (TALK) 22:03, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. She wants to keep being steward. This is good enough reason for me :) --Millosh 13:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, per Bastique (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 02:29, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, any choice will be okay ultimately :-) Perhaps I need to explain why I wish to keep steward access. Some months ago, when I decided not to run again for elections, it was also out of true exhaustion. I needed a break and a very serious one. I feel much better now. But I also need to run like crazy to get again my own life in a working condition (well, such as earning money) and that's a tough one. I kept a few activities in wikimedia related world because I still want to help. But to be fair, that's less than I wish I would do. Last time I went on Commons, I was completely lost within the new rules for deletion and I ran away after a dozen deletions because I was told three times in a row that I should do it this way, not that way, but specifically like this and not like that. I felt completely out of it. A few times, I came to the steward page and felt similarly paralyzed and out of fear of just not doing it the *right* way, I decided to not do anything. I honestly wonder if other oldbies do not feel the same :))) I feel a bit stretched between the idea that I should just do as Angela and completely drop the whole idea of helping in that area (and that would possibly be more reasonable ?), but having the fear that when (if) I want to help again in that area, I will just not be able to do it, and I *know* that I will be too lazy to go again through the entire process to be reelected. It feels like "giving up". To be fair, perhaps the best comment above is the one from Bastique: "Keep, I'm sure we can find work for her." Yeah, what can I be useful for ? Meanwhile... all my thanks to ALL active stewards that help things working properly. Anthere
    But, Anthere, when you say A few times, I came to the steward page and felt similarly paralyzed and out of fear of just not doing it the *right* way, I decided to not do anything., why didn't you simply ask if something was unclear? You really don't need to be ashamed for asking other stewards if you don't know what to do or how. ;o) We are there to help, you know. :) And actually, if you do something wrong, it can always be undone, explained and fixed. We are not on Commons, you won't get shouted on if you don't do things the "right way" after a longer break. ;) --თოგო (D) 00:34, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Believe it or not... I am easily "not bold". Back in 2001... it took me a full month before daring to do my first edit :) Anthere
    Anthere, we don't need you for the stray bit flip or rename or global account lock or what have you. We need you for your experience, going way back, so that when we float new ideas on the mailing list you can say "we tried that in 2006 and here's what happened", and when we try to figure out thorny problems, or review policy implications, you can share your expertise with us. That's far more important than bit flipping. IMHO anyway. ++Lar: t/c 16:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fair enough, and for your question, that was exactly what I felt when I was back to meta from my several month long wikibreak, and that was mainly why I didn't ask for granting the permission I had lost during my break (it had been just few days ago I came back, lol) ... so Keep stay here, I sure bet you find yourself again quite comfortable and familiar in months or even in weeks, just I'm feeling so again. --Aphaia 02:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Per Millosh. Kropotkine 113 08:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Per Anthere's explanation. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 01:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Will Beback 09:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Looks okay.--Caspian blue 05:30, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep trustworthy user, her experience is a valuable asset we should not refuse. Lechatjaune 10:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove Sorry, inactive. Thanks for your hard work, but I think it's time to move on. Majorly talk 22:12, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove. Inactive. SM ** =^^= ** 21:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 23:38, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Two actions are more than one, and I'm not sure I find inactivity to be a very good reason for removal anyways. Anthere can clearly be trusted as a Steward. I don't see how the various projects benefit from a removal in this case. JoshuaZ 02:03, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove – per Kylu and Lar. Too inactive. --Geitost diskusjon 03:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm Institutional memory serves, and past history of exemplary service. Thank you for continuing. NonvocalScream 00:57, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep I agree with Joshua. If Anthere wants to remain a steward, that's good enough for me. Sarah 04:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Inactive. Prodego talk 06:17, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Anthere has always provided a level head around the project, and I'd like her to be a steward for that reason alone. SlimVirgin (talk) 13:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm afraid you will be still inactive, since you write statment you didn't make any steward action. LeinaD (t) 16:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep. Jayjg 19:56, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I felt comfortable this year with every single member of the team. This is true, regardless of the mere count of actions and the amount of interactions on wiki, mailing list, IRC, social networks or real life. Therefore I'd feel much more comfy if all current stewards are confirmed. --M/ 23:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

日本語:
  • 言語: en, fr-3, es-2
  • 候補者の情報: 皆さん、こんにちは。昨年、職務を除けばあまりスチュワードとして活動できませんでした。(職責を頂いているお陰ですが)多数のプロジェクトで盛んに活動させて頂いており、スチュワードに関する機能の要請にお応えできます。スチュワードとして働く意欲は相変わらず持っており、スチュワードの手続きにも携わっています(メーリングリストはこまめに読んでおり、他のスチュワードさんたちとも緊密に連携するようにしています)。

Comments about Bastique

[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

日本語:
  • 言語: en, de-2, fr-1
  • 候補者の情報: 2006年12月よりスチュワードを務めています。現在、人類学修士課程の最終学期です。そちらに過去一年半はほとんどの時間を取られてしまい、今年も5月までは忙殺されそうです。5月以降、まともに活動できるようになると思います。

Comments about Cspurrier

[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

日本語:
  • 言語: fr, en-3
  • 候補者の情報: 所信として申し上げる大筋は昨年と変わりません。スチュワードとして、いくつかミスもありましたが、全体として悪い仕事はしていないと思います。
    私をご存じない方へ:
    • 私の本拠はフランス語版ウィキペディア (frwiki) です。2004年11月より参加し、2005年3月に管理者 (sysop) になりました。また、ビューロクラットも3年間(2006年6月 - 2009年9月)務めましたが、他の活動に注力すべく辞任しました。
    • ボット Loveless を運用しています([2][3] を参照ください)
    • スチュワードになったのは2006年末です。ウィキ上の依頼 steward requests はさぼっていますが、 IRC (#wikimedia-stewards) での緊急依頼に対応しています。その大部分は管理者留守中の荒らしブロック(時には、複数ウィキ荒らしのグローバルブロック)で、荒らし被害の復旧もよく手伝います。私のスチュワード活動の公開記録(チェックユーザーと版不可視化を除く)はこのページでご覧になれます。メタ上での記録(権限変更など)はこのページです。

Comments about Darkoneko

[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

日本語:
  • 言語: de, en-3, grc-3, la-2, es-2
  • 候補者の情報: 皆さん、こんにちは。スチュワードの仕事を続けたいと思います。昨年は学業が忙しく、思ったほど活動できませんでした。しかし、お声がかかれば対処できるよう、なるべく IRC に、特に #cvn-unifications や #wikimedia-stewards で待機するようにしています。前者では、主に版秘匿 (oversight) 関連の作業を行い、また frwiki の臨時 oversight 係を務めました。他方、スチュワードチャネルで頂いた依頼の対処を行いました(それらに関わった方々に感謝いたします)。昨年は全部で 2,000 件ほどログに残るスチュワード活動を行い、おそらくはそれ以上に各ウィキ上でのローカル対処(sysop や oversight)を行いました。ローカル対処は数に入りませんが、一部は集計ツールでご覧になれます。今後ともどうぞ宜しくお願い申し上げます。

Comments about DerHexer

[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

日本語:
  • 言語: es, en (and several romance languages at lang-1 level)
  • 候補者の情報: スチュワードを3年間、他の役割と共に務めてきました。例年通り今年も、私のスチュワードとしての仕事ぶりはどうか、また、どうすればより良い仕事ができるか、皆さまのご意見を伺いにまいりました。他の役割についてもご意見は(常に)有難く承りますが、ここではなく私の会話ページにお願いします。 蛇足ですが、もし仮に(ありそうにないことかも知れませんが)私が良い仕事をしたとお感じの場合、どうか内に秘めず、お言葉を頂ければ励みになります。

Comments about Drini

[edit]
huh? what are those fancy strange things? es:Drini 22:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

日本語:
  • 言語: sr, en-3, hr-3, bs-3, de-1
  • 候補者の情報: 2009年は2008年ほど活動できませんでしたが、スチュワードとして活動中、と言える程度には活動できたかと思います。これまでの2年間、私にしては良い仕事ができたかと思いまして、もしコミュニティの皆さまさえ宜しければ、スチュワード権限を維持させて頂ければと思います。お声がけ頂ければ対処できるよう IRC でお待ちしております。

Comments about Dungodung

[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

日本語:
  • 言語: nl, en-3, fr-1, de-1
  • 候補者の情報: これまで、あまり多く活動できていませんが、ある程度はお役に立てたと思える程度の活動量は維持できたかと思います。しかしながら、活動が少なかったために、方針や機能の増減を全ては把握できていないと思いますので、もっとよく調べる必要を感じています。

    私は他のスチュワードの方々にとって厄介者であったと感じています。各種ルールが何を意図しているのか、ソフトウェアの変更や権限の新設の際に合意や状況がどうであったか、等々について頑迷であったりして、非生産的と感じる方もいらっしゃったかと思います。私はこのことを、守るべき原則を守ることだと思っています。

    私は何が何でもご信任を頂きたいとは思っていません。あまり活動しておらず機能面の増減を把握できていない、と皆さまがお考えなら、スチュワードの立場にしがみつくものではありません。

Comments about Effeietsanders

[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

日本語:
  • 言語: nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  • 候補者の情報: 昨年の選挙でスチュワードになりました。昨年は SWMT 活動と、メタの様々な依頼ページとを中心に、時間を使いました。普段 #wikimedia-stewards で待機することにしています。これまでスチュワード仲間や SWMT メンバー各位との活動で、充実した時間を過ごしました。これを今年も続けたいと思います。

Comments about Erwin

[edit]