Difference between revisions of "Steward requests/Global permissions"

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Requests for other global permissions: Add 'move' right to 'global-flow-create' group)
Line 169: Line 169:
 
Thanks, --[[User:Krd|Krd]] 09:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 
Thanks, --[[User:Krd|Krd]] 09:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 
:{{done}} -[[User:Barras|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Bookman Old Style">'''Barras'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Barras|<span style="color:red; font-family:Bookman Old Style">'''talk'''</span>]] 09:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 
:{{done}} -[[User:Barras|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Bookman Old Style">'''Barras'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Barras|<span style="color:red; font-family:Bookman Old Style">'''talk'''</span>]] 09:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
  +
  +
=== Add 'move' right to 'global-flow-create' group ===
  +
{{sr-request
  +
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
  +
|domain = global<!--don't change this line-->
  +
|user name =
  +
|discussion= [[phab:T127693#2080592]]
  +
}}
  +
Hello!
  +
  +
Flow board creators can't move Flow boards on certain wikis, because they are not autopatrolled there. Is it possible to add "move" rights to "global-flow-create" group? That would concern [[Special:GlobalUsers/global-flow-|these users]].
  +
  +
Thanks, --[[User:Trizek (WMF)|Trizek (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Trizek (WMF)|talk]]) 10:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
   
 
== See also ==<!-- DO NOT EDIT UNDER THIS LINE -->
 
== See also ==<!-- DO NOT EDIT UNDER THIS LINE -->

Revision as of 10:42, 3 March 2016

Requests and proposals Steward requests (Global permissions) latest archive
This page hosts requests for global permissions. To make a request, read the relevant policy (global rollback, global sysop, global rename, …) and make a request below. Explain why membership is needed for that group, and detail prior experience or qualifications.

This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.

Successful global rollback requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion, while successful global renamer and global sysop discussions require no fewer than 2 weeks. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).

Quick navigation: Global Rollback | Global Sysop | Global IP Block Exemption | Global Rename | Other global rights | Removal of access | Local permissions | Unexpired temporary access

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests


Requests for global rollback permissions

Symbol comment vote.svg Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global rollback policy.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have sufficient activity to meet the requirements to be allocated the global rollback flag
  2. You have a global account;
  3. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable.
=== Global rollback for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = Username
}}
::''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+5 days}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than 5 days (other than requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, no other exceptions are allowed, no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Global rollback for Boomer Vial

I have over 3,500 edits on the English Wikipedia, with more than half being acts of anti-vandalism.It'd be awesome to have global rollback rights, for when I expand over to other parts of WikiMedia. Boomer Vial (talk) 23:40, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Not ending before 24 February 2016 23:40 UTC
  • As it says in the heading for this section, please read the policy on global rollback. Specifically, "For consideration, users must ... make heavy use of revert on many wikis." You have edits on only 4 projects, and reverts on one - this activity does not meet the policy requirements. Please gain more experience in cross-wiki vandalism; there is the SWMT if you are looking for ways to help, and you can do that without the rollback button. Regards, Ajraddatz (talk) 00:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose per Ajraddatz. Please help fight vandalism across other wikis, and then come back and request the tool. -FASTILY 00:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose per Ajraddatz.--6AND5 (talk) 00:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose only 50 days on wikimedia. eurodyne (talk) 05:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose I'm a fine vandal fighter on the English Wikipedia, but that still wouldn't grant me global rollback. GR requires cross-wiki anti-vandalism activity. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 23:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral because I don't want to pile on. I would suggest you join #cvn-sw, help reverting vandalism and reopen this request in a couple of months. You can use User:Snowolf/How to globally Twinkle. Best of luck! Defender (talk) 15:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Neutral weak oppose I think your crosswiki experiences show that this nom is too soon for you. Anyway, thanks for your helping.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 18:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose no crosswiki experience in rollbacks. Please help out in small wikis then request. --Ochilov (talk) 09:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose Sorry, don't know who you are, which usually means you're not experienced enough for GR. Riley Huntley (talk) 16:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Closing as X mark.svg Not done. --Stryn (talk) 17:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Global Rollback for Arifys

Not ending before 4 March 2016 11:03 UTC

I want to revert edits vandal and also allows me to easily reverse the action of vandals in all project wikimedia.

Thanks

Face-smile.svg Arifys (Talk) 11:03, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Oppose Oppose-I dont see much rollback in GM's project and in many wiki project.-BRP ever 12:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Neutral weak oppose per BRPever. --Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose Unfortunately, not now. You're off to a great start though! eurodyne (talk) 17:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose little to no experience... can tell from en.wikibooks behavior. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 20:11, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose need more activity --Biplab Anand (Talk) 05:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support why not? IkhsanNH (talk) 07:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose Masih perlu banyak pengalaman. Lebih baik fokus admin wiki lokal dulu. Still need more experience. It's better to focus on your local adminship first. Bennylin 11:47, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment Comment Sebaiknya kamu fokus ke pelajaran sekolah sebentar lagi ujian. You must focus to study at your school because the test is coming. IkhsanNH (talk) 12:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 14:11, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose per above, concerns with limited x-wiki experience -FASTILY 05:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Global rollback for Eurodyne

Not ending before 6 March 2016 04:25 UTC

My third request, here are my second and first requests. I've been active as a member of the SWMT for over a year now and would like to have global rollback to better help me fight vandalism. Since my last request, I have had all of my sanctions removed on enwiki and am now also an administrator on Wikidata. eurodyne (talk) 04:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support No concerns over previous sanctions, considering adminship at Wikidata. Activity has been demonstrated and in my opinion, any concerns mentioned in previous requests have been addressed. Keep up the great work! Riley Huntley (talk) 04:39, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support sure, per rationale. --HakanIST (talk) 05:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support I see activity and experience and think it's ok now with previous issues. —Ah3kal (talk) 06:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support-BRP ever 08:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support I've been working with eurodyne since quite time ago and I trust in him/her. He/She also has advanced rights on several wikis and a good cross-wiki experience. I'm convinced he/she would do a good use of the tool.--Syum90 (talk) 09:07, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support No concerns.Reguyla (talk) 14:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support. No reason not to support. RadiX 16:39, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support Definitely a trusted user, will make good use of the tool. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 22:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Strong oppose Definitely an untrustworthy user. No thanks. --MF-W 22:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
@MF-Warburg: Please can you explain us why do you think he/she is not a trustworthy user?--Syum90 (talk) 10:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support --Kolega2357 (talk) 22:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support Sure. PiRSquared17 (talk) 23:00, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose Sorry mate, I really like you as a person but you just seem to collect hats. And that is something I cannot support. Natuur12 (talk) 23:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support. I see lots of undos in his global contribs and I'm sure that Eurodyne can help as GR. Érico (talk) 23:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose per MF-W and Natuur12. I still don't feel this user has abandoned hat collecting. -Mh7kJ (talk) 23:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support -FASTILY 05:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support per Syum90. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Requests for global sysop permissions

Symbol comment vote.svg Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global sysops policy.
Stewards
When you give someone global sysop rights, please list them on Users with global sysop access and ask them to subscribe to the global sysops mailing list.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).
=== Global sysop for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = Username
}}
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential. Please note: Since 2019 all global sysops are required to have two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled.

Global sysop for Zppix

Not ending before 11 March 2016 13:59 UTC
  • Oppose Oppose, first you have to become a local sysop.--6AND5 (talk) 15:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose Can't see any crosswiki antivandalism activity, which is the main scope of this permission.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose please be more active global vandal fighter-BRP ever 16:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
  • X mark.svg Not done Closed by applicant, was some reason redirect here when attempting to become local sysop will reapply locally ASAP Zppix (talk) 17:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Global sysop for rxy

Not ending before 13 March 2016 15:21 UTC

Thanks for vote to my steward election. btw, I'd like to return to a Global sysop. I'll be active at wmf wikis from this year. and I want to help for stewards, global sysops, and wikimedia communities. If I appointed as a global sysop, I'll be helpful for maintenance and anti-vandalism. Thanks. --rxy (talk) 15:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

You just did not succeed in that election because people thought you returned to activity too recently. So why does this request come immediately after it? --MF-W 15:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your question.
Reason: Sometimes I feels late to handling an anti-vandalism request by Stewards or GSs. If anytime requests handled by Stewards or GSs quickly, I'm not making this requests, and I don't run for SE.
About of my activity in this year: I returned to Japanese Wikipedia for helping as the temporary sysop for stopping massive vandalism bot (Log 1, 2, 3, 4). After that, I talk about to change a department in my job to boss, and that is approved. For this, I'll be active at wmf wikis from this year.--rxy (talk) 19:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support It probably wasn't wise to run immediately after SE, but I think this will be a net positive. --Rschen7754 19:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support fine by me. --Defender (talk) 20:02, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support More than happy to have him back. Ajraddatz (talk) 05:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support as long as activity is consistent, I'm happy to support. eurodyne (talk) 06:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support--Lanwi1(Talk) 06:34, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support--BRP ever 08:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support--Per analysis of their recent edits, they seem to have some solid crosswiki antivandalism activity, which is the important usecase here.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support Per Jo-Jo Eumerus. Riley Huntley (talk) 09:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support --Vituzzu (talk) 09:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support --6AND5 (talk) 09:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support --HakanIST (talk) 11:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support He should've been appointed as a steward... but since that did not happen, this is a good alternative imho. Trijnsteltalk 14:28, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Why not? Clearly helpful.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support, of course. Érico (talk) 21:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support Reguyla (talk) 22:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support Natuur12 (talk) 00:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support No concerns. —Ah3kal (talk) 06:52, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support Off-course! Syum90 (talk) 09:08, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support No problems from what I can see. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 22:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:21, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support --Kolega2357 (talk) 22:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support -FASTILY 05:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Requests for global IP block exemption

Symbol comment vote.svg Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions. Please review Global IP block exemption.
Please note: Global IP block exemption does NOT make one immune to locally-created blocks of any sort, only global blocks.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting global IP block exemption, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To request global IP block exemption
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why you need the access and why you're suitable. If needed, link to relevant discussions.
=== Global IP block exempt for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name =  Username
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if there is demonstrated need for the permission, such as bypassing a global block from someone who is not the intended target.


Requests for global rename permissions

Symbol comment vote.svg Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the global rename policy and the global renamers policy page.
Stewards
When you give someone global rename rights, please add them to the list of global renamers and ask them to subscribe to the global renamers' mailing list.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
  3. You have considered the addition of a user language box to your user page
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).
=== Global rename for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = meta.wikimedia <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = Username
}}
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.


Requests for other global permissions

Symbol comment vote.svg Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting additional global permissions, make sure that:

  1. You are logged in on this wiki;
  2. No specific section on this page exists for the permission you want to request;
To request additional global permissions
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain what kind of access you need and why. If needed, link to relevant discussions. If you hold, or have previously held, the right and are asking for either a renewal or revival of that right, please add a link to the previous discussion.
=== <Add requested permission here> for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = Username
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration. A steward will review the request.

Global abusefilter-helper for Matiia

Hi. I'm requesting this user rights as I'd like to be to see private abusefilter logs on non-GS wikis. As a GS, I'm able to see private abusefilter logs on most of wikis, and as a metawiki admin, I'm able to see global private abusefilter logs, but I'm unable to see private abusefilter logs on non-GS wikis, where a lot of spam can be found. Matiia (talk) 03:12, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Seems like an out-of-scope request to me. --Vogone (talk) 03:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
    Huh? AFAIK, the scope of this user rights is not defined. Where has it been discussed? Matiia (talk) 02:08, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
    The group has initially been created for Nemo bis and the scope mentioned in his request. Also the group name suggests the intention behind the group's creation. --Vogone (talk) 22:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
    No. While this usergroup was created to allow Nemo bis be to able to see private abusefilters, its scope was not discussed, as it was created as an alternative not to add to him abusefilter editor rights. Matiia (talk) 00:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
    Why "No"? Of course it does suggest an intention. --Vogone (talk) 00:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
    I mean that its scope was not mentioned in his request. He requested abusefilter editor rights and some users opposed to it, so this usergroup was created as an alternative, and as Ruslik0 thought it'd be one person group, it makes sanse this usergroup to be called so. Matiia (talk) 01:27, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support I fully trust in him, if he says he needs the tool then I support his request.--Syum90 (talk) 09:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support I fully trust Matiia as well. I seriously doubt they will do anything wrong with this. Reguyla (talk) 14:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  • What is the purpose of seeing private AF logs on non-GS wikis? --MF-W 22:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
    Mainly being to able to find spambots. I also watch abusefilters logs on eswiki to try to improve local abusefilters (i.e. finding falsepositve or edits what they didn't trigger, for the filter be fixed (I know I'm not a local admin, but well... I try to help out as much as I can being a normal user)) and as some of them are private, I always need to ask some local admin to tell me what happened. Being to able to see private abusefilters codes on other wikis would be useful as well, to find some ideas about how to improve them. Matiia (talk) 00:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose Sorry but I think I tend to agree with @Vogone here. The vast majority of spambots are logged in the global abuse filter log and in the meta spam blacklist log. Non-GS wikis are suposedly big enough to deal with those issues you mention. —MarcoAurelio 19:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Support Support --Kolega2357 (talk) 22:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

remove global OTRS member for VasilievVV

Thanks, --Krd 09:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -Barras talk 09:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Add 'move' right to 'global-flow-create' group

Hello!

Flow board creators can't move Flow boards on certain wikis, because they are not autopatrolled there. Is it possible to add "move" rights to "global-flow-create" group? That would concern these users.

Thanks, --Trizek (WMF) (talk) 10:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

See also