Stewards/Confirm/2016/Einsbor

Einsbor

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: pl, en-3, fr-2
Personal info: Hi! I am active in Wikimedia project as editor since 2013. This is my first confirmation, since I have been elected a year ago.
During this term I was active mostly by answering for requests here, at meta (SRP, SRCU, SRGP, SRG) and via IRC (with spamming, LTA, vandals, etc.). I have not any 'steward specialisation', but I tried to be active where it was needed. I think this kind of stewardry is also important for the Wikimedias, so I would like to continue it.
I'd love to serve to the community for another term. I'm open for discussions, questions, etc. Must say, I'm not satisfied with my activity level and I'll work on it this year, if confirmed. einsbor _talk 14:42, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

italiano:

Lingue:
Informazioni personali: translation needed

español:

Idiomas:
Información personal: translation needed

русский:

Языки:
Личная информация: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen:
Informationen zur Person: translation needed

Nederlands:

Taalvaardigheid:
Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed

Comments about Einsbor

Keep, activity is fine, but I was quite disappointed when Einsbor removed an admin on Wikidata against the policy and didn't even bother to revert this action or at least give a reply after he's been notified about it. Since this is the only occasion where a lack of communication skills were shown, I hope it remains the only one and wish better luck with future actions ;-) --Vogone (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The mentioned issue has been resolved today with some delay, so this is no longer a concern. --Vogone (talk) 14:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, ok. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Polimerek (talk) 16:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Wieralee (talk) 17:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 19:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Helped process the ArbCom elections on en.wiki faster than usual. Altamel (talk) 19:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep I would like to see more acivity from the candidate on pl.wiki, but... oh well... he's the famous Iceman! - has always his own way. Emptywords (talk) 22:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --White Master (e s) 23:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Better luck for the future. — T. 07:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Michał Sobkowski (talk) 07:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Andrzei111 (talk) 08:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Laurent Jerry (talk) 09:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --J.Dygas (talk) 09:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep would like to see more activity, first year is always learning — billinghurst sDrewth 13:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 15:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity and no significant concerns — NickK (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Luke 081515 16:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~Cybularny ^Speak? 18:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I didn't support last year. :) --Uğurkent^talk 20:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KeepMicpol (talk) 20:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 21:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stanko (talk) 13:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Maire ♣ 20:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK. Ankry (talk) 15:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 17:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove has contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards.--Snaevar (talk) 18:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Devwebtel ^(query) 14:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per billinghurst. Green Giant (talk) 01:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mo Cuishle (talk) 10:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Torrosbak (talk) 11:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove No contributions to en.wikiversity within years! --Marshallsumter (talk) 16:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Though you may like people contributing to wikiversities it is hardly related to stewards' role. Above all, you shouldn't forget there are 14 more wikiversities which are as important as the English one. --Vituzzu (talk) 18:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Did a good job the past year and will surely continue with that in 2016. Trijnstel_talk 22:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:17, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 16:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good luck with those 'Cross-wiki spam' :) ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:49, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Plogeo (talk) 13:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Cynko (talk) 14:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Absolutely no reason to comment otherwise. Great fellow steward! -Barras talk 18:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and helpful steward --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 01:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 15:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --DerekvG (talk) 18:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ok --—Ah3kal (talk) 09:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pablo000 (talk) 16:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Elmie (talk) 20:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Active and does good work. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and sound steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:19, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 08:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]