From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards‎ | Confirm‎ | 2020

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

  • Languages: uk-N, ru-4, be-3 (only understanding), en-2.5, fr-0.5, es-0.5, nl-0.5, ja-0.5, ukl-0.5
  • Personal info: Ante scriptum. I am currently at Bukovel with my off-wiki world colleagues, I did not manage to write my statement earlier.

    This is my first confirmation as a steward.

    In 2019, I was moderately but quite irregularly active with some noticeable gaps. During the tenure I responded to some steward queue OTRS, handled some part of SRP and SRGP requests. I also participated in a couple of Steward/Trust and Safety calls, did some maintenance on steward wiki and managed some user rename requests, especially for requests originating from uk or ruwiki as well as participated in some of the discussions stewards had on the mailing list or at IRC. I the list above is not exhaustive, but I did not get involved in other activities notably enough (yet). Not directly a steward activity, but I also tried to make it more clear what stewards are for for the people I interacted with, mostly Ukrainian Wikipedia contributors.

    In my stewardship, I tried to support nominations from the small wikis more, to be more verbose in case of self-removals, I do not like it when we just mention some cryptic "on hold for one day per standard practice" without highlighting what is it good for, I also tried to make as little deal of global IP block exception flag as I possibly could, putting potential help of contributors from censored areas over potential risk of them being LTAs (as in the latter case GIPBE does not give them a lot of merit actually). I am also happy that I have made my own and other stewards' life a bit easier with a small gadget on Steward wiki related to GIPBE flag management.

    I am satisfied with my tenure for all but being able to maintain stable activity. I remember that it was voiced as one of the concerns during my election. I tried to address other things mentioned then, and I am now going to address this one too. I want to believe that I have good baseline to build activity on, that includes being more active with what I already did and also getting involved in some things which I did not cover yet.

    Be it that I am confirmed or not, I hope I was an asset to the steward team and I thank everyone for the support and criticism they have shown me at different stages of my stewardship from the election last year to the confirmation now. It is important for me. I also intend to help the stewards group regardless of me being technically one or not, be that with some technical (e.g. one needs a script for something) or social (e.g. steward usergroup needs some help) things as long as I am welcome to do that.
  • Lingue:
  • Informazioni personali: translation needed
  • Idiomas:
  • Información personal: translation needed
  • Языки:
  • Личная информация: translation needed
  • Sprachen:
  • Informationen zur Person: translation needed
  • Taalvaardigheid:
  • Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed
  • ভাষা:
  • ব্যক্তিগত তথ্যাদি: translation needed

Comments about Base[edit]

  • Hi Base. I'd like to vote keep because you did a fine job, but absent a statement from yours saying whether you want to prolong your stewardship or not it is difficult to cast a comment one way or another. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC) Keep Keep; thanks. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -- CptViraj (📧) 14:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Per MarcoAurelio--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Keep Keep Seen some good work around at SRP, I will say activity needs to be more but sufficient as per normal confirmation needs, although 1st year stew is a little low. I am glad for their statement.--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 06:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Waiting for a statement. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:47, 8 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Keep Keep now that the statement is made. Like what others have said, I'm willing to give Base another chance to improve his activity. Real life gets in the way sometimes. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:25, 9 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove--Turkmen talk 15:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove --Herby talk thyme 16:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove no statement. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:57, 8 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove as much as I hate opposing people due to activity, I don't see a need for someone to retain tools specifically in the Steward set when they have't been used in 3.5 months and prior to that, an almost 7 month gap which is the bulk of the 2019 term. A statement, I do not feel would change this for me. Sorry. Praxidicae (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I want you to keep your steward right, but since there's no statement I'm remaining neutral. Keep Keep --Stïnger (会話) 18:32, 8 February 2020 (UTC).Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep This is a tough call as activity is a bit below what I expect from a first-year steward (usually they are more energized and low activity now often indicates a further drop in future years) but I'm willing to give Base another year to increase activity. --Rschen7754 00:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep. Meiræ 01:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

*Remove Remove I think, any people who has potential dangerous to the Crimea should retired from this group. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]