Jump to content

Steward requests/Checkuser: Difference between revisions

Edit links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 57: Line 57:
=== Username@meta.project ===
=== Username@meta.project ===
{{CU request
{{CU request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|status = notdone<!--don't change this line-->
|language code = meta
|language code = meta
|project shortcut= w
|project shortcut= w
Line 72: Line 72:
|reason = I'm asking here (meta) for a check because the user is a cross-wiki vandal (ca en es fr it hu la pt sq sv tl tr). A Portuguese sysop has already blocked one of his IPs, the one I'm reporting as first, because it was an open proxy. Unfortunately only one IP of the range 66.160.128.0/18 (AS6939 HURRICANE - Hurricane Electric, Inc., US) was blocked, while lots of other IPs on the same range are still used by him. Furthermore this is not the only range he's using, because the same proxy provides other ranges too, 72.52.64.0/18 and 74.82.0.0/18. All these IPs are being used to make the same edits in different wikis. Such edits are also being done by recently registered users who make almost only these edits, I have no doubt he's the same person, even if I may have missed a few IPs or sockpuppets around the wikis. I have to add one more thing: I'm sorry to have observed that the only real (not hidden by a proxy) IPs he's used belong to Italian IP ranges, such as 151.34.0.0/16 and 151.36.0.0/16, which makes this vandal an Italian, Italian as me. Last but maybe least too, adding such information to the fact that in certain cases those same edits have been done some time ago by an Italian registered user, Ninonino, as shown [https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Malephora&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=124005235&oldid=115842371 here] and [https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Malephora&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=143222094&oldid=140323860 here], and to the fact that this user's last edits were made about one month ago (dec. 4th, 7th and 15th) in the same days the vandal made his, makes me think that this user might be the sockmaster, but since I'm not sure about this last point I'm not including him in the check request. If this is not the right place for a cross-wiki check request, please tell me the most correct place to make it, thank you. [[Special:Contributions/151.64.176.253|151.64.176.253]] 18:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
|reason = I'm asking here (meta) for a check because the user is a cross-wiki vandal (ca en es fr it hu la pt sq sv tl tr). A Portuguese sysop has already blocked one of his IPs, the one I'm reporting as first, because it was an open proxy. Unfortunately only one IP of the range 66.160.128.0/18 (AS6939 HURRICANE - Hurricane Electric, Inc., US) was blocked, while lots of other IPs on the same range are still used by him. Furthermore this is not the only range he's using, because the same proxy provides other ranges too, 72.52.64.0/18 and 74.82.0.0/18. All these IPs are being used to make the same edits in different wikis. Such edits are also being done by recently registered users who make almost only these edits, I have no doubt he's the same person, even if I may have missed a few IPs or sockpuppets around the wikis. I have to add one more thing: I'm sorry to have observed that the only real (not hidden by a proxy) IPs he's used belong to Italian IP ranges, such as 151.34.0.0/16 and 151.36.0.0/16, which makes this vandal an Italian, Italian as me. Last but maybe least too, adding such information to the fact that in certain cases those same edits have been done some time ago by an Italian registered user, Ninonino, as shown [https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Malephora&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=124005235&oldid=115842371 here] and [https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Malephora&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=143222094&oldid=140323860 here], and to the fact that this user's last edits were made about one month ago (dec. 4th, 7th and 15th) in the same days the vandal made his, makes me think that this user might be the sockmaster, but since I'm not sure about this last point I'm not including him in the check request. If this is not the right place for a cross-wiki check request, please tell me the most correct place to make it, thank you. [[Special:Contributions/151.64.176.253|151.64.176.253]] 18:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
}}
}}
:{{notdone}} We do not accept checkuser requests from unregistered users. [[User:Ruslik0|Ruslik]] ([[User talk:Ruslik0|talk]]) 18:46, 9 January 2018 (UTC)


==See also == <!-- DO NOT EDIT UNDER THIS LINE -->
==See also == <!-- DO NOT EDIT UNDER THIS LINE -->

Revision as of 18:46, 9 January 2018

Shortcut:
SRCU
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}:  Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale
{{Declined}}:  Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}:  It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball

This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also requesting checkuser access). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.

Before making a request:

  1. Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.
  2. Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using diff links or other evidence.
  3. Make sure there are no local checkusers.
  4. Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:


How to make a request

How to make a request:

  • Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also {{srcu}} help). 
    === Username@xx.project ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = 
 |project shortcut= 
 |user name1      = 
 |user name2      = 
 |user name3      = 
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
 |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
}}

    For example: 

    === Example@en.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = en
 |project shortcut= w
 |user name1      = Example
 |user name2      = Foo
 |user name3      = Bar
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
 |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
}}
  • Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.
Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests

يوسف عاشق الجبل@ar.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
يوسف عاشق الجبل (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s):
Not done. arwiki has its own local checkusers. RadiX∞ 02:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Κατακλυσμός@el.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Κατακλυσμός (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Δαφνοστεφανωμένος (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Vrahomarinaner (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
ΕΝΑΣ ΝΤΕΛΙΚΑΝΗΣ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): A previous check this month (Steward requests/Checkuser/2017-12#Δαφνοστεφανωμένος@el.wikipedia ) has already confirmed that Δαφνοστεφανωμένος and Vrahomarinaner are the same user's accounts. Now the user who is permanently blocked seems to be back under the username Κατακλυσμός, using the same patern of contribution, same topics, same type of writing and adding references to articles. It looks like it's just the beginning, but the sooner his use of a puppet account is revealed, the better it would be for the whole el@wikipedia community, as it will avoid any potential edit wars, personnal attacks ad hominem etc. as it's the mentionned before user's habit.-- Montjoie-Saint-Denis !!! συζήτηση 10:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Technical evidence says all accounts listed above are  Confirmed from a technical point of view. RadiX∞ 18:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Michaelversatile@ru.wiktionary

Status:    Done
List of users
Aka PAAN (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Pogrebnoj-Alexandroff (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Аваллак'х (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Russian Wiktionary on behalf of the team asks to see the stewards of these participants, because they have the typical figures of speech, editing and istochniki edits (see the text of the participant Cinemantique). In addition, the participant at the other site (see image #2) in the text Cinemantique , said that he has a second account in the Wiktionary, and that it bypassed the lock. Party Michaelversatile immediately the parish began to write articles, I use the same speed as his other accounts. In addition, the account was created immediately after photo 2 Aka PAAN wrote the message. Also, you can view the text of this message here: http://traditio.wiki/Традиция:Портал_сообщества . We hope that you will check these accounts.. Pavliukdanila (talk) 14:26, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Говорите по русски потому, что я не понимаю, что вы написали. Ruslik (talk) 18:27, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
вы понимаете русский? отлично. От имени сообщества Викисловаря, подаю заявку на проверку перечисленных участников. У них всех один стиль общения, обороты речи, а самое главное -вклад. Подробнее о пересечении аккаунтов Pogrebnoj-Alexandroff и Aka PAAN расписал участник Cinemantique здесь: [2]. на той же странице, есть скрины, где участник оскорблять Викисловарь, а также, заявляет, что имеет ещё аккаунт в Викисловаре. Аккаунт Michaelversatile был зарегистрирован сразу после этого заявления, и сразу стал писать статьи, при том, что некоторые участники этому месяцами учатся. Просим проверить участников, т.к. не имеем своих проверяющих, что к стати, скоро может случиться)). --Pavliukdanila (talk) 18:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Заявления участника на другом сайте находятся здесь: http://traditio.wiki/Традиция:Портал_сообщества --Pavliukdanila (talk) 18:58, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ruslik0: Не уверен насчёт Michaelversatile. Добавил Аваллак'х: новая учётка, интерес к сексуальной тематике, создал статью о сомнительном слове, пишет на СО участников, забывает подписываться.--Cinemantique (talk) 17:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Cinemantique:, может быть, мне тоже показалось странным его поведение. Посмотрев поведение и вклад Michaelversatile, думаю, это не он. Вычеркну его. А вот приведенный тобой ник - похож по составу с Aka... так как тоже из букв А преимущественно состоит. --Pavliukdanila (talk) 18:10, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Pogrebnoj-Alexandroff не редактировал с 2006 и, соответственно, никакой информации нет. Между Aka PAAN и Аваллак'х нет ничего общего. Ruslik (talk) 18:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Username@meta.project

Status:    Not done
List of users
66.160.128.0/18 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
72.52.64.0/18 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
74.82.0.0/18 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
151.34.0.0/16 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
151.36.0.0/16 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
151.68.0.0/16 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Baka Líte (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Myeuurn (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): I'm asking here (meta) for a check because the user is a cross-wiki vandal (ca en es fr it hu la pt sq sv tl tr). A Portuguese sysop has already blocked one of his IPs, the one I'm reporting as first, because it was an open proxy. Unfortunately only one IP of the range 66.160.128.0/18 (AS6939 HURRICANE - Hurricane Electric, Inc., US) was blocked, while lots of other IPs on the same range are still used by him. Furthermore this is not the only range he's using, because the same proxy provides other ranges too, 72.52.64.0/18 and 74.82.0.0/18. All these IPs are being used to make the same edits in different wikis. Such edits are also being done by recently registered users who make almost only these edits, I have no doubt he's the same person, even if I may have missed a few IPs or sockpuppets around the wikis. I have to add one more thing: I'm sorry to have observed that the only real (not hidden by a proxy) IPs he's used belong to Italian IP ranges, such as 151.34.0.0/16 and 151.36.0.0/16, which makes this vandal an Italian, Italian as me. Last but maybe least too, adding such information to the fact that in certain cases those same edits have been done some time ago by an Italian registered user, Ninonino, as shown here and here, and to the fact that this user's last edits were made about one month ago (dec. 4th, 7th and 15th) in the same days the vandal made his, makes me think that this user might be the sockmaster, but since I'm not sure about this last point I'm not including him in the check request. If this is not the right place for a cross-wiki check request, please tell me the most correct place to make it, thank you. 151.64.176.253 18:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done We do not accept checkuser requests from unregistered users. Ruslik (talk) 18:46, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser&oldid=17623525"