Forabediment total

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This page is a translated version of the page Global bans and the translation is 11% complete.
Outdated translations are marked like this.

Un Forabendiment total es lo retrach formal de la possibilitat de modificar o de profièchar d'autres privilegis (coma l'utilisacion de "Special:EmailUser" per exemple) dins totes los projèctes de Wikimedia. Un forabendiment total a per objectiu d'empachar de nafrar los projèctes quora lo problèma pot pas esser reglat per la communotat per un biais mai restrictiu, e en consequencia, es generalament permanent. Un forabediment toal es pas una mena de punicion o un biais de balhar una " periodi cool down." Un forabendiment total es l'expression d'un consensus clar dins la communotat.

Los forabendiments totals sont applicats sonque quora mai d'una communautat independenta an ja decididas de bannir l'utilizaire per sos abuses. Los projèctes Wikimedia son independents. Normalament, i a presumpcion de bona fe quora un utilizaire ven membre d'una novèla communautat cal que siaguèsson sos precedents dins los altres projectes. En consequencia, lo forabendiment total es pas possible quora un utilizaire es sonque bloquat per un moment o forabendit sus un sol projècte. Vos pregam de vos sovenir que los forabendiments totals son volontarament força rares.

Cal pas confondre lo forabendiment total amb lo blocatge total, mejan tecnic empachan un utilizaire de modificar los projèctes Wikimedia.

Critèris pels forabandiments globals

Lo forabendiment total pot essèr envisajat sonque quora totes los critèris seguents son emplenats :

  1. L'utilizaire fa prova de tota una paletta d'abus de mai d'un wiki (que son pas sonque de vandalismes o de spam). Lo forabendiment total es pas necessari per los vandalismes e lo spam de mai d'un wiki que provoquan pas de contraversa; dins aqueste cas, cal referir directament al global requests noticeboard.
  2. L'utilizaire es estat plan informat de ço qu'èra una participacion appropriada e aguèt una justa escasença de corigir los problèmas. Los projèctes abusats devon aver plan mostrat de bona fe dins l'ensach d'explicacion de las bonas praticas e dels bons comportaments correspondents a lor mission e lor portada. Aqueste critèri es mes en plaça per verificar que l'utilizaire èra rasonablament al fial de ço que l'esperava, aguèt l'occasion de tratar lo problèma, e causiguèt de pas participar coma cal als projèctes.
  3. Aqueste utilizaire es bloquat o forabendit perpetualament sus dos o mai projèctes. Aquestes projèctes devon aver mostrat un plen accord amb aquestes blocages o forabendiment per una discussion communautari importanta— d'explicacions claras e los problèmas amb las praticas e reglàs localas devon essèr evidents, la decision deu essèr estada presa en independencia del blocage o del forabendiment sus un altre projècte, e lo blocage o lo forabendiment deu esser clarament previst per esser permanent.

Emplenar los critèris minimals precedents significa pas qu'un forabendiment total es necessari. De rasons ja utilisadas per demandar lo forabendiment total incluon:

Relation to local policy

This policy is meant to complement existing policies and procedures for all projects, not act as a replacement. All governance of the dispute resolution process remains the responsibility of each individual community, and this process is not a venue for entertaining proposals to ban or block a user on a single project.

Relation to the Terms of Use

The Wikimedia Terms of Use, which apply equally to all users of the projects, specifically refer to this policy and supports banning users violating either the terms themselves or any mandatory community policies and guidelines. As the service provider of Wikimedia websites, the Foundation has and continues to support community consensus relating to blocking and banning decisions.

Obtaining consensus for a global ban

A simplified workflow.

Consensus for a global ban is conducted through the requests for comment process on Meta. A global ban request must only be accepted when a user presents a clear and current danger to all Wikimedia communities, a decision is backed by a broad and clear consensus that fairly represents the vast majority of Wikimedia projects, and careful consideration of concerns and possible consequences are evident in the decision. In order to initiate a discussion on whether harm to all communities is evident and merits a global ban, please do the following:

  1. Confirm that the user satisfies all criteria for global bans prior to opening a request for comment.
  2. File a new request for comment on Meta. The title should have the username of the user nominated for a global ban. The nominator must impartially document the significant incidences that satisfy all criteria for global bans. The nominator must also attempt to show that the user's decision not to participate appropriately presents a current danger to all Wikimedia communities.
  3. Inform the user about the discussion on all wikis where they are active. If the user nominated for a global ban is blocked on Meta, a temporary unblock may be considered to allow participation in the discussion.
  4. Inform the community on all wikis where the user has edited about the discussion through a prominent public venue. Be sure to stay neutral in your communications and avoid any defamatory, inaccurate, or exaggerated commentary.

A nomination that fails to correctly follow the above steps is invalid, and may be speedily closed. In addition, to make a nomination valid, the nominator must:

  1. have a Wikimedia account; and
  2. be registered for more than six months before making the request; and
  3. have at least 500 edits globally (on all Wikimedia wikis).

Once a valid request for comment has developed a broad and clear consensus, an uninvolved and impartial steward may close the discussion. Discussion should be open for at least two weeks, but no more than one month. Stewards may extend the discussion in exceptional circumstances. Requests can be closed without extensive discussion when frivolous. Requests can be closed after an extensive discussion when no consensus is likely to be reached.

Multilingualism in discussion

Please be aware that the discussion can and should be conducted in the relevant language or languages of any projects where the user has been active. Wikimedia projects exist in hundreds of languages, and thus a wide variety of communities should be afforded the ability to participate in global discussions regardless of their fluency in any second language. In cases where there are no human translators available, machine translation may function as a substitute for communication between communities.

Implementing a global ban

A global ban formally revokes some or all privileges at all Wikimedia projects, regardless of whether accounts are attached through the unified login system. Any attempt to circumvent an active global ban constitutes a violation of the Terms of Use, regardless of accounts used. Accordingly, local communities where the user is blocked or active should be informed in a prominent public venue about the decision. Stewards may also choose to respond to requests to globally lock proven alternate accounts of a globally banned user.

If the consensus requires steward action, a request should be made to the stewards. Please provide a link to the relevant discussion in your request; otherwise it will be rejected for lack of consensus.

Overturning a global ban decision

Discussion to overturn a global ban decision is conducted through the request for comment process on Meta, in order to include the widest possible audience. A request must follow the same consensus process for requesting a ban, described above.

See also