Stewards/Elections 2024/Votes/Lee Vilenski

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2024 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Lee Vilenski[edit]

ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: en-GB-N
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello, my name is Edward and I've been on Wikipedia since 2016. I have been an administrator since 2020 on the English language Wikipedia, where I also function as a Bureaucrat. I edit in a bunch of areas, mostly around quality content; finding admin volunteers and keeping articles in line with policy.

    In addition to my role on the English Wikipedia, I have always been willing to help out with additional projects. I am often looking for users that I believe are suitable for Sysop on my home Wikipedia, and contacting the general public to donate images for my personal field of expertise - cue sports. I am also a moderator on the English Wikimedia Discord server.

    In 2020 I was elected as a Sysop on the English Language Wikipedia, and two years later as a Bureaucrat, the first user to be elected to the position with an account created since 2010. If elected as a Steward, I would offer my experience, enthusiam and willingness to pick up new areas with me to the role.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2024/Questions#Lee_Vilenski


Yes[edit]

  1. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Your statement is pretty mediocre, in that it looks lazy and you didn't really explain what you plan to do with stewardship. That being said, you made a good effort to answer the questions presented to you, such as your answer to the question set to all candidates that was unique and had sufficient depth. As a result, you're getting my vote, since I mark candidates heavily based on potential, not cross-wiki experience. In the future though, if you don't pass this election, please make a better statement, as some of the other candidates have done. Leaderboard (talk) 15:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Red-tailed hawk (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2024   Trusted user. I think that Lee would make a good steward. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Frostly (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Frostly (talk) 06:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. UA0Volodymyr (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024   UA0Volodymyr (talk) 03:01, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sebastian Wallroth (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hey man im josh (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   I do think Lee would make a good steward if given the opportunity. Hey man im josh (talk) 04:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by Tmv)2024   Good luck! Have a good year! Nurtenge (talk) 11:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  8. 0xDeadbeef (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   0xDeadbeef (talk) 05:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  9. ProcrastinatingReader (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Agree steward is a xwiki role, I trust Lee's judgement however and his answers to questions. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Filipović Zoran (talk) 11:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Gog the Mild (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024   Gog the Mild (talk) 20:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Remsense (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   With the main opposition being the lack of crosswiki experience, from personal experience I think the candidate would quickly acquire said experience in the steward role, and it does not concern me enough to require opposition at present. Remsense (talk) 05:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   My wholehearted support Dolotta (talk) 12:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Weltenspringerin (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Weltenspringerin (talk) 15:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Miniapolis 16:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  16. S60W79 (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   --S60W79 (talk) 22:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Elli (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2024   Elli (talk) 15:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  18. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   NoychoH (talk) 17:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Koreanovsky (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   As much as I am familiar with the work of Lee Vilenski, I do believe that he has a lot of potential. Lack of cross-wiki activities is legitimate concern, but I believe that he might make a good steward and that the things to improve will be improved over time. Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 18:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Casliber (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Capable - should be net positive Casliber (talk) 02:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Hanif Al Husaini (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 10:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Shizhao (talk) 11:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   Moral support, they'd probably be fine as a steward. Legoktm (talk) 04:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  25. SunDawn (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Prairie Astronomer (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Prairie Astronomer (talk) 17:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Guerillero Parlez Moi 18:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Dantheanimator (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Dantheanimator (talk) 21:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Zippybonzo (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Zippybonzo (talk) 12:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Kreuz Elf (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   Kreuz Elf (talk) 17:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  31. BlackStar1991 (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024   I Support this candidate BlackStar1991 (talk) 09:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Ideophagous (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Ideophagous (talk) 17:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   I don't see any competency issues or anything. I don't really care about the cross wiki experience argument. Lee will do just fine as a steward. Natuur12 (talk) 19:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  34. BRPever (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   BRP ever 11:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Dfertileplain (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Dfertileplain (talk) 12:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Grandmaster Huon (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Grandmaster Huon (talk) 00:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Toadspike (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024   I've reconsidered after withdrawing a Yes vote. Lee Vilenski is a trusted editor and we need more Stewards. Having him on board can do no harm (I hope I don't regret saying that...). Toadspike (talk) 22:48, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Eraevsky (Eligible, checked by Julius 12345)2024   Eraevsky (обс.) 15:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024   Moral support, candidate can be trusted with this access, though obviously more relevant experience would be useful. I hope the candidate considers getting involved in more global/cross-wiki work regardless of the outcome. – Ajraddatz (talk) 19:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Alfa-ketosav (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Alfa-ketosav (talk) 09:12, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Ericliu1912 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2024   —— Eric LiuTalk 16:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Sdkb (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024   Sdkbtalk 21:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Bio06940 (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024   Bio06940 (talk) 00:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  44. AdaHephais (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   AdaHephais (talk) 12:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Rexogamer (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Rexogamer (talk) 19:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Takipoint123 (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024   Takipoint123 (talk) 19:33, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Shahnamk (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024   best regards Shahnamk (talk) 19:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  48. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024   BrunoBoehmler (talk) 20:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  49. JSFarman (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024   JSFarman (talk) 02:26, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No[edit]

  1. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   As far as I could see, his activity is almost limited to the English Wikipedia. No cross-wiki experience. I would like to see more cross-wiki experience and involvement in the future, and then I will consider support. --Stïnger (会話) 14:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Sdrqaz (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   I prefer stewards to have greater administrative activity, as the candidate has made 26 logged actions on the English Wikipedia in 2023. I know that numbers aren't everything, but I think that a steward who wants to work at SRG should have made more than 12 blocks in a year. The experience, enthusiam and willingness to pick up new areas are good traits to have, but I have trouble seeing how the candidate's experience translates over to being a steward – I don't think that being a bureaucrat is enough on its own, sorry. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. TenWhile6 (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Not enove global work TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 14:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Giraffer (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   I have great respect for the work Lee does on enwiki, but I'm not convinced that steward is the right role for him. He has no significant functionary, crosswiki, or technical experience, and his statement and questions don't really explain what he intends to do as a steward, nor why he is particularly suited to the role. Giraffer (talk) 14:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5. LR0725 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Limited xwiki experience, mostly active at English Wikimedia projects. LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 14:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Ján Kepler (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Per others above me. Ján Kepler (talk) 14:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Fenikals (talk) 14:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Eta Carinae (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Eta Carinae (talk) 14:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   say this every year, won't trust ppl who only edit enwiki and have sysop rights there with the steward tools..its not a stepping stone.. Stemoc 14:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  10. JrandWP (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Sorry, although he had good works on enwiki, the crosswiki experiences are insignificant. JrandWP (talk) 14:41, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  11. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Very little cross-wiki experience. The statement doesn't say why they run as a steward, and the answers to the questions seem rather vague to me, so I'm not sure if the candidate has a good idea of what a steward should do. MF-W 15:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  12. NightWolf1223 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   I am not seeing alot of xwiki experience. NightWolf1223 (talk) 15:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Maximillion Pegasus (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   First, I'd like to thank the candidate for volunteering. It is always appreciated when people are willing to step up and take on more responsibility. However, this candidate lacks two vital criteria for me to vote yes. 1. This user is monolingual and 2. (the most important) There is a distinct lack of any cross-wiki activity/engagement, whether that be in the form of cross-wiki monitoring, taking on other global roles, or being active in some other form globally here at Meta or otherwise. I do appreicate his service at en.wiki, and hope he continues to do good there. Best regards, Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 15:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Prodraxis (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Lack of cross-wiki nor functionary experience per others. Prodraxis (talk) 15:40, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Ferien (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Brilliant editor but your experience is limited to the English Wikipedia - with some content writing on the Simple English Wikipedia too which is appreciated. I don't see any need for the tools or experience related to steward work unfortunately. --Ferien (talk) 16:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  16. SHB2000 (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Limited x-wiki activity; response to questions not convincing. SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 16:37, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Minilammas (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   --Minilammas (talk) 16:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   I would be happy to support next time if you increase your cross-wiki activity Ameisenigel (talk) 16:50, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  19. 1108-Kiju (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Thank you for your work on the English Wikipedia. However, An important element in SE, there is little activity in meta 1108-Kiju/Talk 17:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Funkruf (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   I'm sorry, but you are mainly only active in the English Wikipedia. Please increase your contribution in the other cross-wikis. Funkruf (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  21. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   I'm not a priori opposed to candidates from enwiki, but I do expect some functionary or antiabuse experience from them, which is not the case here. ~~~~
    User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
    17:14, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Needs (more) cross-wiki and/or global activity and experience. Novak Watchmen (talk) 17:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Pppery (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   * Pppery * it has begun 19:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  24. DarkMatterMan4500 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Maybe contribute to Meta more as well? DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 19:36, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Enkhsaihan2005 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024   Enkhsaihan2005 (talk) 20:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Queen of Hearts (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024   Sorry, but not enough xwiki work. 2nd most edited wiki is scowiki, where the candidate only has 1,962 edits. Queen of Hearts (talk) 22:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  27. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by JrandWP)2024   ToBeFree (talk) 23:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  28. USSR-Slav (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   USSR-Slav (СССР-Слав) (talk) 02:34, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Ruy (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   Not enough crosswiki experience, maybe next time. Ruy (talk) 03:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Minorax (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Don't see enough crosswiki experience to be a steward. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Quangkhanhhuynh (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Need more cross-wiki activities. Khanh ( talk | contribs | CA | vi ) 04:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Insufficient cross-wiki experience. – Ammarpad (talk) 08:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024   Not enough crosswiki experience. Rzuwig 10:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Tmv (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Tmv (talk) 11:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Lookruk (Eligible, checked by Tmv)2024   --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 12:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Richardkiwi (talk) 12:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Eddie891 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024   -- I personally like Lee, and have great respect for his work on en-wiki, but I'm not convinced he has demonstrated enough cross-wiki involvement / skillset here. Eddie891 (talk) 13:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024   Activity is too concentrated on enwiki unfortunately. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:33, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Wooze (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024  . Wooze (talk) 17:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Neriah (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024   per above. Neriah - 💬 - 21:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Nguyentrongphu (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Cross-wiki experience is needed. Good luck for next year! Nguyentrongphu (talk) 00:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  42. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024   dwadieff 03:04, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024   ミラP@Miraclepine 03:42, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  44. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Total lack of cross-wiki experience. Hopefully you'll do better next year if you work on that. JavaHurricane 12:01, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Hehua (Eligible, checked by JrandWP)2024   Hehua (talk) 12:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024   Stewardship is essentially a cross-wiki role, leaning heavilly towards small wikis. ——SerialNumber54129 19:09, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Ankermast (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024   Per Serial Number Ankermast (talk) 06:05, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024   Ferran Mir (talk) 12:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Pinigin (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Pinigin (talk) 14:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Jan Myšák (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Jan Myšák (talk) 14:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Justarandomamerican (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Justarandomamerican (talk) 16:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Victor Schmidt (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   next to no x-wiki activity Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Bencemac (Eligible, checked by NightWolf1223)2024   Bencemac (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by NightWolf1223)2024   Dostojewskij (talk) 21:52, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  55. EggRoll97 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Extraordinarily little cross-wiki/global activity. EggRoll97 (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  56. ChrisWx (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Needs more cross-wiki experience to be a steward. The enthusiasm and willingness to work in new areas is appreciated, but does need more experience as a steward. ChrisWx 🌀 (talk - contribs) 04:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  57. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 04:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Julius 12345 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Sorry, but you don't have global permissions. Julius 12345 (talk) 10:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  59. DCB (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   DCB (talk) 12:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Kadı (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Kadı Message 13:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Paradise Chronicle (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Besides the low activity levels mentioned above, I have made the experience that after they had approved Russia for a GA status which was then found to have some serious flaws afterwards, Lee Vilenski didn't help much resolving the issue. Thats ok for an average editor but from a Steward I'd expect they get involved in fixing the mistakes they were involved. What if they mess up and just leave? Thanks for volunteering, but not for the moment.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:25, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Styyx (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Lack of x-wiki experience. Styyx (talk) 16:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Cremastra (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024   per the above. More x-wiki experience needed, and maybe more languages. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 17:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  64. ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (talk) 19:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024   Centaur271188 (talk) 22:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Hamid Hassani (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   Sorry! — Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Gereon K. (talk) 12:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Ankry (talk) 13:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Ultratomio (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Ultratomio (talk) 23:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   English only? Jusjih (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Adtonko (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   crosswiki is what you may lack Adtonko (talk) 11:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Hadrianus (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   Hadrianus (talk) 03:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024   Laurent Jerry (talk) 16:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Renvoy (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Sorry but I cannot see someone with almost no edits in the meta-wiki main space as a steward reNVoy (user talk) 22:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   No cross-wiki activity in areas related to stewards at all and very little in general. No language skills besides English. Meiræ 22:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  76. 용인 학생 (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   ㅡ Joayong (Suggest) 14:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   per above unfortunately, concerns with limited x-wiki activity Fastily 23:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  78. MdsShakil (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   —MdsShakil (talk) 08:58, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Saroj (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt)2024   Saroj (talk) 09:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Brewster239 (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt)2024   Brewster239 (T·C·CA) 09:50, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   I barely see any cross-wiki experience. Daniuu (talk) 16:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Intothatdarkness (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024   Intothatdarkness (talk) 18:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Sleyece (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   Sleyece (talk) 01:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Aizenr (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Aizenr (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Xania (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024   Xania (talk) 09:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  86. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 00:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Insufficient cross-wiki experience with just one submitted SRG request. Those who wish to serve as stewards should first train themselves in which requests to lock or globally block (or remove a lock or global block) to accept and which to not. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  88. ZERTINHO (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   ZERTINHO (talk) 06:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Vp08122010 (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024  Insufficient cross-wiki experience VP PRM VIR💬📝 16:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Mirer (talk) 21:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Draken Bowser (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Draken Bowser (talk) 14:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Spielvogel (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   per above ( cross wiki exper.) Spielvogel (talk) 20:15, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Antoine.b (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024   Antoine.b (talk) 12:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  94. NgocAnMaster (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Same as K6ka, you need more cross-wiki experiences. Anster (talk) 13:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2024   No cross-wiki experience Taivo (talk) 18:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
       Buffs (Not eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)   Buffs per failure to respond to the question posed about arwiki (talk) 19:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Fehufanga (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Thank you for volunteering, and thank you for the work you do at enwiki, but cross-wiki experience is important for a steward, due to the scope of the role which extends beyond Meta. If you become more active in cross-wiki activities such as anti-vandalism. --*Fehufangą✉ Talk page05:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  97. ドラみそ (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   doramiso-meta (talk) 01:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Albertoleoncio (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2024   Eu gostaria de ver em uma possível próxima candidatura, um maior domínio da wiki além da mera experiência com administrador: seja como CU/OS, seja em outras wikis além da Wikipédia em inglês. Este voto não está em inglês justamente para demonstrar isso. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 12:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  99. HarleyQuinn (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Need more crosswiki experience HarleyQuinn❤️ (talk) 13:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Base (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2024   Base (talk) 13:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral[edit]

  1. Aspere (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Aspere (talk) 14:45, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. V0lkanic (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Not enough crosswiki experience expected from a steward. On the other hand, I do find the answers you have provided convincing. V0lkanic (talk) 17:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. DreamRimmer (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   – DreamRimmer (talk) 03:33, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (talk) 08:32, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   A few more years can help. cyrfaw (talk) 13:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  6. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Trusted but near to zero required cross-wiki involvement/experience. CptViraj (talk) 13:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Jeffrey Beall (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2024   Jeffrey Beall (talk) 16:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Wutsje (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2024   Moral support, but needs a lot more cross-wiki experience. Wutsje (talk) 19:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Aca (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024   Aca (talk) 22:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Daniel Mietchen (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Daniel Mietchen (talk) 23:47, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024   Tvcccp (talk) 07:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  12. SMcCandlish (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2024   Concerns about lack of cross-wiki activity are legitimate, though I trust Lee Vilenski to do the right thing with the project's best interests at heart (and he's a 'crat on our biggest wiki for good reason). But I also interact with Lee Vilenski in content on a regular basis, and feel a bit interest-conflicted.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  10:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Lionel Cristiano (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024   Lionel Cristiano (talk) 22:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Em-mustapha (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   No cross wiki contribution Em-mustapha talk 11:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Wolverène (talk) 08:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Drummingman (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024   Drummingman (talk) 16:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Zivax (Eligible, checked by JrandWP)2024   Zivax (talk) 13:28, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Needs more cross-wiki activity for me to support, but won't pile-on oppose out of respect for Lee. Lepricavark (talk) 15:34, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jphwra (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Jphwra (talk) 11:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Masti (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   masti <talk> 16:44, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:24, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  22. FlyingAce (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   –FlyingAce✈hello 20:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2024   Berlin-George (talk) 02:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Nicolas Eynaud (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Nicolas Eynaud (talk) 14:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  25. DraconicDark (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Trusted user on enwiki but lacking a bit in cross-wiki experience. DraconicDark (talk) 18:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Maleine258 (talk) 20:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  27. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2024   PoetVeches (talk) 16:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Z1KA (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Z1KA (T) 17:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Nattes à chat (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Nattes à chat (talk) 23:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  30. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2024   DannyS712 (talk) 23:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Darkhan 10:39, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  32. M7 (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   M/ (talk) 13:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]