From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This is a public acknowledgment to all other fellow Stewards, including those who left. I am usually concise, so this time I will just mention that I am grateful to you for every time that you have preceded me in one of your action, and that I hope not to have bothered you if I have done the same. It is a pleasure to know that I can be of use, and that you will be at hand whenever I am busy or absent. A special "thank you" for those who managed to be in S.F. this year, and a "see you soon" to all who didn't make it. A great admiration for those who gave our little community much efforts in doing additional tools for managing things, connecting tools and troubleshooting errors. I owe you much, really. --M/ (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
...there should be a "keep all" section - or a script with a button that does that in each section. I'd like to vote Keep to all of them, but I don't feel like doing this in a few dozen sections manually. ^^ --თოგო (D) 00:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
I moved the following exchange to the talk page, since such a specific topic isn't really appropriate on the main page. Drmies (talk) 20:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Ehm, no. Regardless of the merit of these comments, the confirmation pages are also for discussion about the points which were brought. --MF-W 21:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
The summaries below only provide a convenient overview. Stewards should review the actual confirmation comments and their understanding of relevant policies before commenting.
Confirmation discussions will last one week after the appointment of the newly elected stewards. This may be extended to two weeks for one or more confirmations at the discretion of the Election Committee if the committee believes further input is required before concluding. The Election Committee will close these discussions and implement the outcome (which also means making a decision in non-obvious cases).
This section is for steward discussion only. Please do not comment in this box unless you are a steward.
Each discussion below starts with a summary of the confirmation comments. Coloured and underlined names have notes attached; move your cursor onto the names to show the notes, or refer to this legend:
- Agrees with this point, but favours confirmation.
- Agrees with this point, but opposes confirmation.
- Agrees with this point, but is undecided about confirmation.
Status
|
Candidate
|
Notes
|
Confirmed
|
Ajraddatz
|
Nihil obstat.
|
Confirmed
|
Avraham
|
Concerns about activity, but clear consensus to confirm.
|
Confirmed
|
Barras
|
Concerns about the steward-OC double role, but clear consensus to confirm.
|
Confirmed
|
Bennylin
|
Concerns about activity, but clear consensus to confirm.
|
Confirmed
|
Bsadowski1
|
Few concerns about activity, but clear consensus to confirm.
|
Confirmed
|
DerHexer
|
Nihil obstat.
|
Confirmed
|
Einsbor
|
Few concerns about activity, but clear consensus to confirm.
|
Confirmed
|
Hoo man
|
Nihil obstat.
|
Confirmed
|
Jyothis
|
Nihil obstat.
|
Confirmed
|
Linedwell
|
Nihil obstat.
|
Confirmed
|
M7
|
Nihil obstat.
|
Confirmed
|
MarcoAurelio
|
Nihil obstat.
|
Confirmed
|
Mardetanha
|
Concerns about use of oversight tools, but clear consensus to confirm.
|
Confirmed
|
Matanya
|
Nihil obstat.
|
Confirmed
|
MBisanz
|
Concerns about activity, but clear consensus to confirm.
|
Confirmed
|
Melos
|
Nihil obstat.
|
Confirmed
|
Mentifisto
|
Concerns about activity, but clear consensus to confirm.
|
Confirmed
|
MF-Warburg
|
Clear consensus to confirm.
|
Confirmed
|
Pmlineditor
|
Concerns about activity, but clear consensus to confirm.
|
Resigned
|
Pundit
|
His statement was an acknowledgement of his decision to resign from the steward role after the end of the confirmations.
|
Confirmed
|
QuiteUnusual
|
Nihil obstat.
|
Confirmed
|
RadiX
|
Concerns about activity (and unhappiness about announced long absence), but clear consensus to confirm.
|
Confirmed
|
Ruslik0
|
Concerns about communication, but clear consensus to confirm.
|
Confirmed
|
Savh
|
Nihil obstat.
|
Confirmed
|
Shanmugamp7
|
Nihil obstat.
|
Resigned
|
Snowolf
|
His statement was an acknowledgement of his decision to resign from the steward role after the end of the confirmations.
|
Confirmed
|
SPQRobin
|
Concerns about activity, but clear consensus to confirm.
|
Confirmed
|
Stryn
|
Nihil obstat.
|
Removed
|
Taketa
|
Removal due to too many community concerns about activity, mistaken actions and usage of the tools.
|
Confirmed
|
Tegel
|
Nihil obstat.
|
Confirmed
|
Teles
|
Clear consensus to confirm.
|
Confirmed
|
Trijnstel
|
Nihil obstat.
|
Confirmed
|
Vituzzu
|
Clear consensus to confirm.
|
The 2016 Steward Election Committee has come to following conclusion:
- Taketa is to be removed (3 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral);
- Snowolf and Pundit are to be removed due to their announced resignation (5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral);
- All other stewards are to be confirmed (5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral).
99 users commented on Ajraddatz' confirmation, or 25.7% of participating users. Final revision r15395304.
Favourable
- no reason given
66 agreed (33 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter, Syum90, RadiX, Natuur12, Widr, Vituzzu, 1989, BRPever, Infinite0694, Alan, Armbrust, HakanIST, Euphydryas, Kurtis, Atcovi, White Master King, Az1568, Hedwig in Washington, Legoktm, Danny B., Eurodyne, Kolega2357, Rxy, Epìdosis, Eumolpo, Vincenzo1492, Teles, Uğurkent, MoiraMoira, Avraham, Zerabat, Shivanarayana, Érico, Itti, INeverCry, Ghilt, Arkanosis, Devwebtel, PokestarFan, Green Giant, Quenhitran, Melos, Matanya, GZWDer, Bennylin, BeeCeePhoto, Courcelles, Mh7kJ, Matiia, Wpollard, Zyephyrus, Matěj Suchánek, Jmvkrecords, FrankyLeRoutier, MarcoAurelio, DerekvG, Jo-Jo Eumerus, 분당선M, Theo10011, Vonoserbizky Spartacus, MBisanz, Kapçak, DARIO SEVERI, Taichi, Wagino 20100516, Quiddity
- sufficient/good/high activity; helpful
12 agreed (87 didn't mention this).Rschen7754, Stemoc, Wikitanvir, NahidSultan, बिप्लब आनन्द, Pmlineditor, Einsbor, Barras, Shanmugamp7, Taketa, Trijnstel, Snowolf
- good steward/good work etc.
10 agreed, 1 seconded (88 didn't mention this).Vogone[Riley Huntley], Miniapolis, Jianhui67, NickK, Allen2, Trijnstel, Taketa, Billinghurst, Timk70, Snaevar
- trusted user
3 agreed (96 didn't mention this).Philosopher, Jan Kovář BK, Taketa
- "heard all good about this guy"
1 agreed (98 didn't mention this).Juandev
- knowledgeable
1 agreed (98 didn't mention this).Ejs-80
- contributed to en.wv
1 agreed (98 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
- unspecific "per above"
1 agreed (98 didn't mention this).Liuxinyu970226
Concerned
- no reason given
1 agreed (98 didn't mention this).Hindustanilanguage
- no babel info in the statement
1 agreed (98 didn't mention this).Jusjih
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (98 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 3 neutral "comments" (1 without reason, 2 because of knowing nothing/not enough about his steward work).
- Confirm. Nihil obstat for confirmation IMHO. —MarcoAurelio 18:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Mardetanha talk 19:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm; high support, no valid concerns. SPQRobin (talk) 20:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Nihil obstat. No relevant concerns whatsoever, IMO. RadiX∞ 02:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. None of the oppose reasons are relevant. --MF-W 21:34, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 21:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm nihil obstat. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. Linedwell (talk) 12:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:24, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. einsbor talk 07:18, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Clear cut. ✒ Bennylin 02:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 15:51, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
69 users commented on Avraham's confirmation, or 17.9% of participating users. Final revision r15390172.
Favourable
- no reason given
30 agreed (39 didn't mention this).Widr, Polimerek, Vituzzu, Armbrust, Pharaoh of the Wizards, White Master King, Az1568, Eumolpo, Guerillero, Kolega2357, Marcelo Victor, INeverCry, Philosopher, Green Giant, Melos, Matanya, GZWDer, Bennylin, Courcelles, Jusjih, Zyephyrus, KTo288, Jo-Jo Eumerus, MarcoAurelio, DerekvG, 분당선M, MBisanz, Wagino 20100516, Mailer diablo, .js
- hopes that Avraham will become more active
7 agreed, 6 seconded (56 didn't mention this).Natuur12[RadiX], Miniapolis, Wikitanvir[NahidSultan], Billinghurst[Jianhui67, Teles, Érico], NickK, Charitwo, Barras[Shanmugamp7]
- sufficient activity / became already more active
6 agreed (63 didn't mention this).Rschen7754, Ajraddatz, Trijnstel, Taketa, Pmlineditor, Snowolf
- good steward/good work etc.
4 agreed (65 didn't mention this).Liuxinyu970226, AryanSogd, Taketa, Snowolf
- trusted user
2 agreed (67 didn't mention this).Altamel, Taketa
- "big help" when active
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).Kurtis
Concerned
- inactivity / concerns about activity
13 agreed, 9 seconded (47 didn't mention this).Billinghurst[Jianhui67, Teles, Érico], Steinsplitter[DCB, Richardkiwi, CaZeRillo], NickK, Stemoc, Natuur12[RadiX], Uğurkent, Miniapolis, Laurent Jenny, Wikitanvir[NahidSultan], Hedwig in Washington, Snowolf, Charitwo, Barras[Shanmugamp7]
- no reason given
2 agreed (67 didn't mention this).6AND5, Vadgt
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed, 1 seconded (67 didn't mention this).Auvajs[Kusurija]
- not contributed to en.wv
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
- "has contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards"
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).Snaevar
- "concerns" about neutrality
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).Severino
- 1 neutral "comment" (without reason).
- Confirm. —MarcoAurelio 18:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Clear consensus to confirm Ajraddatz (talk) 18:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- confirm Mardetanha talk 19:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. The positive feedback from among community members surpass some concerns with activity. RadiX∞ 02:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Neutral. The only relevant oppose reason is inactivity, but it is shared by a significant number of users. --MF-W 21:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per consensus, please listen to the activity concern. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm same as Matanya. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm while concerns about activity were raised, there is consensus to confirm. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - The inactivity issue is mentioned by several people but even those tend to confirm Avi. So there seems to be a clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, agreed with Barras. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Concerns regarding activity. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:24, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, like Trijnstel and Barras. einsbor talk 07:20, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm ✒ Bennylin 02:16, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Only a few concerned by inactivity.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 15:51, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
106 users commented on Barras' confirmation, or 27.5% of participating users. Final revision r15388837.
Favourable
- no reason given
60 agreed (46 didn't mention this).Herbythyme, Syum90, RadiX, Natuur12, Brainswiffer, Agruwie, Emergency doc, Vituzzu, Infinite0694, Alan, Armbrust, HakanIST, White Master King, -jkb-, Az1568, Hedwig in Washington, Legoktm, Andreas Werle, Danny B., Eurodyne, Laberinto16, Jianhui67, Rxy, Luke081515, Vincenzo1492, Teles, MoiraMoira, Yeza, Thibaut120094, Charitwo, Kolega2357, Widr, Marcelo Victor, Bernard, Érico, Darwinius, Ah3kal, Itti, BeverlyHillsCop, INeverCry, Arkanosis, Devwebtel, Melos, Matanya, GZWDer, Gordonrox24, Taichi, Microchip08, Courcelles, Berlin-George, Matiia, Zyephyrus, MarcoAurelio, Jo-Jo Eumerus, Theo10011, MBisanz, Elmie, Wagino 20100516, Mailer diablo, Quiddity
- good steward/good work etc.
9 agreed (97 didn't mention this).BRPever, Osiris, Billinghurst, Bennylin, Rax, NahidSultan, Shanmugamp7, Taketa, Snowolf
- commenter has no problems with steward-OC double role
4 agreed, 2 seconded (100 didn't mention this).Wikitanvir, NickK[Green Giant], Avraham, Guerillero, Pmlineditor
- trusted user
5 agreed (101 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter, Rax, Trijnstel, Antigng, Taketa
- is able to stay active as a steward despite being an OC member
2 agreed, 3 seconded (101 didn't mention this).Rschen7754[Miniapolis, Riley Huntley], NickK[Green Giant]
- trusted user
3 agreed (103 didn't mention this).Snaevar, Philosopher, Rus793
- good user on simplewiki
2 agreed (104 didn't mention this).Fylbecatulous, PokestarFan
- competent, helpful
2 agreed (104 didn't mention this).GeoTrinity, Tufor
- kind to(?) the commenter
1 agreed (105 didn't mention this).Liuxinyu970226
- still active editing
1 agreed (105 didn't mention this).Etamni
- opposed 3 proposals at Requests for comment/Removal of bureaucrats in small wikis
1 agreed (105 didn't mention this).Holder
Concerned
- because of the steward-OC double role (COI)
5 agreed, 3 seconded (98 didn't mention this).Vogone[Stemoc, Odder, CaZeRillo], -revi[Odder], Rax, DerekvG. Snowolf
- concerns about activity
2 agreed (104 didn't mention this).Laurent Jenny, Uğurkent
- not contributed to en.wv
1 agreed (105 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
- alleged "pro-vandalism attitude"
1 agreed (105 didn't mention this).Hindustanilanguage
- opposed 3 proposals at Requests for comment/Removal of bureaucrats in small wikis
1 agreed (105 didn't mention this).Jusjih
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (105 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 2 neutral "comments" without reasons.
- Confirm. Some might not like it, but WMF decided to remove the incompatibility of OC members, and Barras is just following policy and I've not noticed any wrongdoing from him with regards to this. The other oppose reasons are unrelated to steward activities. No reasons not to confirm IMHO. —MarcoAurelio 18:29, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - the OC/Steward COI issue was decided by the WMF, and is unrelated to his steward work. Ajraddatz (talk) 18:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Raised concern had be solved by WMF and has nothing to do with user Mardetanha talk 19:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- 'Confirm. WMF has already stated that the Steward-OC double role is not a issue anymore, and Barras was proved to manage both roles wisely, IMO. Besides, no relevant concerns were raised. RadiX∞ 03:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm though I don't like the double role. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. It is a valid reason to oppose confirmation because of the steward-OC double role. WMF has not "solved" this concern, it has caused it by allowing stewards to become OC members without resigning. But that doesn't mean that users are not allowed to prefer the old situation. However, here this is the only valid concern and not shared by a high number of users. --MF-W 21:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 21:48, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm outstanding steward, concerns where solved by WMF. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Consensus to confirm. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:25, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Double role is okay for me. ✒ Bennylin 02:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus. OC issue could be discussed in another moment.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 15:51, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
79 users commented on Bennylin's confirmation, or 20.5% of participating users. Final revision r15390242.
Favourable
- no reason given
21 agreed (58 didn't mention this).Vituzzu, Teles, Widr, Érico, INeverCry, Ryan Ajie, Melos, GZWDer, Jusjih, Zyephyrus, DerekvG, Wagino 20100516, Mailer diablo, Cybularny, .js, Billinghurst, Liuxinyu970226, Jianhui67, Matanya, Pundit, Jo-Jo Eumerus
- activity is ok
7 agreed, 2 seconded (70 didn't mention this).RadiX, NickK, Avraham[Shangkuanlc], Trijnstel[Bonaditya], Shanmugamp7, Taketa, Ah3kal
- useful language skills
8 agreed (71 didn't mention this).Avraham, Snaevar, JarrahTree, Barras, Shanmugamp7, Ah3kal, La femme de menage, Snowolf
- late statement doesn't matter / should not lead to removal
6 agreed (73 didn't mention this).Jianhui67, NickK, Green Giant, Courcelles, Barras, Nguyentrongphu
- good steward/good work etc.
4 agreed (75 didn't mention this).Ajraddatz, Taketa, Snowolf, Meracritus
- diversity is important
2 agreed (77 didn't mention this).Cekli829, Ruslik0
- trusted user
1 agreed (78 didn't mention this).Snaevar
- no concerns about his actions
1 agreed (78 didn't mention this).NickK
- "we need more people"
1 agreed (78 didn't mention this).Pratyeka
Concerned
- inactivity
11 agreed, 1 seconded (67 didn't mention this).Stemoc, Riley Huntley, Az1568, Wikitanvir, Ochloese, Jni, CaZeRillo, Ruslik0, Natuur12, Rschen7754, MarcoAurelio[NahidSultan]
- did not create a statement before the start of SC
7 agreed, 4 seconded (68 didn't mention this).Vogone[Steinsplitter, Armbrust, Jsharpminor], Hedwig in Washington, Wikitanvir, MF-Warburg, Ajraddatz, Kurtis, MarcoAurelio[NahidSultan]
- no reason given
9 agreed (70 didn't mention this).Atcovi, White Master King, SQL, Meracritus, DCB, Informationswiedergutmachung, GeoTrinity, Timk70, Lt2818
- unspecific "remove per above"
2 agreed (77 didn't mention this).Herbythyme, Uğurkent
- not contributed to en.wv
1 agreed (78 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (78 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 6 neutral "comments" without reasons.
- I need time to review this in depth and I abstain for now. —MarcoAurelio 18:35, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Per M7 and QU, I'm going for a weak confirm here. I don't think there's consensus to remove, although the activity issues are valid, but not strong enough for me to vote removal at this time. —MarcoAurelio 15:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Remove with regret. I personally want Bennylin to stay on, but there is a critical mass of people opposing based on inactivity (which is essentially what the lack of statement is). Ajraddatz (talk) 19:00, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Keep. As I said in my first comment, I personally want Bennylin to stay on - all of my interactions with him have been positive, and I remember him being particularly helpful on a few issues over the last year. If my colleagues do not feel that a critical mass of people are opposing him based on inactivity, and indeed he is active enough per policy, then I am more than happy to take the majority view. Ajraddatz (talk) 22:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- confirm though the raised concern about inactivity is legit and valid but I think given the number of keep voters, user deserves second chance Mardetanha talk 20:00, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Activity is on the low side, but can always be removed for inactivity per policy if it continues. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- None of the "remove" reasons has convinced me. Instead, I find that many of the "keep" comments are highlighting good reasons to allow Bennylin to continue his work, even if in the low stats. Also, considering the number of people, consensus is around 2/3, and over if discounting "blanket remove(s)" as usually is done in those cases. --M/ (talk) 14:10, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per M7. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Weak confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per M7. Melos (talk) 20:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Per M7. Even though there is a bunch of legit concerns on activity, I think there is no consensus to remove. RadiX∞ 13:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Neutral. The only relevant oppose reason is inactivity (general/SC-related), but it is shared by a significant number of users. --MF-W 21:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Stewards policy#Loss of steward access states: "[S]ince stewardship is typically a position likely to get into trouble and since the steward group can easily control itself, the confirmation itself will be done by other stewards.…Stewards will be specifically careful to review situations when opposition from the community is registered." I have reviewed the opinions posted by the community, and while I understand their concerns, I would prefer to retain Benny's steward status, as he has not fallen below mandatory activity requirements, and his language knowledge is especially valuable in that the languages he knows are those which are less helped by automatic translators. Not every steward has to be a Snowolf or a Tegel and be online all the time. We function as a group; we support Wikimedia projects as a group, and my cost-benefits analysis is that Benny still contributes enough and in needed areas to be reconfirmed per his wish to continue volunteering. -- Avi (talk) 21:54, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm weight in keep reasons much heavier. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Weak confirm. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Weak confirm Several users raised (valid) concerns about inactivity. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - I see a very weak consensus to keep him as steward. A whole lot of users wishes him confirmed. So remove reasons are due to inactivity (more than 150 actions in the last term, not much, but still ok). Confirmation statement came late, but it came. That can simply happen due to real life issues. The remove reasons are less heavy weighted here, so I think confirming is ok. -Barras talk 12:17, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Weak confirm. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Concerns regarding activity. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Weak confirm. MBisanz talk 20:25, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Weak confirm, einsbor talk 07:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. I see valid concerns about inactivity. Sadly, this confirmation started with an inclination for the removal and the single fact that he did not create a statement may have played an important role on that, while others supported even with no statement yet. After the statement is created, there is a clear change on that inclination tending to a more supporting one. That goes against the also valid argument to keep regarding the language skills and the good work he does overall. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:20, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
81 users commented on Bsadowski1's confirmation, or 21.0% of participating users. Final revision r15388843.
Favourable
- no reason given
52 agreed (29 didn't mention this).Syum90, Natuur12, Vituzzu, BRPever, Infinite0694, Ajraddatz, Riley Huntley, Miniapolis, Druddigon, White Master King, Az1568, Legoktm, Liuxinyu970226, Ah3kal , Danny B., Eurodyne, Etamni, Jianhui67, Rxy, Vincenzo1492, Teles, MoiraMoira, Uğurkent, Avraham, Kolega2357, Widr, Érico, -jkb-, Charitwo, Green Giant, Henryk Borawski, Melos, Matanya, GZWDer, Gordonrox24, Bennylin, Chenzw, Microchip08, Courcelles, Matiia, Zyephyrus, DerekvG, 분당선M, Theo10011, Pablo000, Timk70, MBisanz, DARIO SEVERI, Wagino 20100516, Mailer diablo, Quiddity, Trijnstel
- active
7 agreed, 1 seconded (73 didn't mention this).Rschen7754[Armbrust], Wikitanvir, NickK, Barras, Shanmugamp7, Taketa, Snowolf
- fighting LTAs
6 agreed, 2 seconded (73 didn't mention this).Rschen7754[Armbrust], RadiX, Billinghurst, INeverCry, Jo-Jo Eumerus, MarcoAurelio[Pmlineditor]
- no concerns about his actions
4 agreed (77 didn't mention this).Vogone, NahidSultan, NickK, Snowolf
- good steward/good work etc.
3 agreed (78 didn't mention this).Atcovi, Stemoc, Taketa
- helpful
2 agreed (79 didn't mention this).Barras, Shanmugamp7
- always around when needed
1 agreed (80 didn't mention this).Osiris
- trusted user
1 agreed (80 didn't mention this).Taketa
Concerned
- low activity
2 agreed (79 didn't mention this).Snaevar, Laurent Jerry
- no babel info in the statement
1 agreed (80 didn't mention this).Jusjih
- five years is long enough
1 agreed (80 didn't mention this).LavaBaron
- not contributed to en.wv
1 agreed (80 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (80 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 4 neutral "comments" without reasons.
- Confirm. Nihil obstat, confirmatur. —MarcoAurelio 18:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - inactivity concerns were the only opposes related to steward work, and there is clearly consensus to keep. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Mardetanha talk 20:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Nihil obstat, IMO. RadiX∞ 20:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm; clear consensus. SPQRobin (talk) 20:35, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:42, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. "Low activity" could be a valid reason for opposing, but not here when both of the users who mentioned it don't even opine in favour of not confirming; and when actually several more users mentioned the (high) activity. --MF-W 21:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 21:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm nihil obstat. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:25, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. einsbor talk 07:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
195 users commented on DerHexer's confirmation, or 50.6% of participating users. Final revision r15390188.
Favourable
- no reason given
155 agreed (40 didn't mention this).Infinite0694, Syum90, Andreas Werle, Toni Müller, Helfmann, RadiX, Natuur12, Fctberlin, Agruwie, Brainswiffer, Emergency doc, Widr, Susann Schweden, Vituzzu, Sally Meyer, Koenraad, BRPever, Agricolax, Alexander Gamauf, Mh7kJ, Mario-WL, Pimpinellus, Bubo bubo, Armbrust, Petronas, 1971markus, Asio otus, Wassertraeger, Geolina163, Didi43, Ajraddatz, Murma174, Riley Huntley, Miniapolis, Impériale, Emptywords, Kurtis, White Master, Betterknower, Regiomontanus, Stemoc, Reinhard Kraasch, Az1568, Liuxinyu970226, Legoktm, PaulaMeh, Jbergner, Dnepro.., Ah3kal, Wikitanvir, Danny B., Eurodyne, Laurent Jerry, J.Dygas, Herbythyme, Pankoken, WS ReNu, Billinghurst, Lutheraner, Jianhui67, Rxy, Epìdosis, Luke081515, Vincenzo1492, Freddy2001, Schelmentraum, Florianschmidtwelzow, XXnickiXx, Teles, MoiraMoira, Uğurkent, Emes, DCB, Man77, Plani, WolfgangRieger, Partynia, Kolega2357, Cvf-ps, Alraunenstern, Darwinius, Peter Gröbner, Itti, Code, AnnaS.aus I., Ali1610, Jan Kovář, AleXXw, Aude, BeverlyHillsCop, INeverCry, Sänger, -jkb-, Ghilt, Ejs-80, Snaevar, Philosopher, MARKELLOS, Arkanosis, Shivanarayana, Green Giant, Quenhitran, Melos, GeoTrinity, Matanya, Ana al'ain, GZWDer, Matthias Süßen, Bennylin, Informationswiedergutmachung, Horgner, Steschke, HIMBA, Chricho, Seidenkäfer, Microchip08, Courcelles, Berlin-George, CaZeRillo, Matiia, Taivo, Mglaser, Slökmann, Jusjih, Nioger, Zyephyrus, Martin Kraft, Aspiriniks, Jmvkrecords, HakanIST, MarcoAurelio, DerekvG, Nhfflkh, 분당선M, Schwalbe, Theo10011, Biha, Kacir, AFBorchert, Einsbor, MBisanz, Elmie, Olaf Kosinsky, Aquilinae, Holder, DARIO SEVERI, Wagino 20100516, Artmax, Mailer diablo, S.Didam, Cybularny, Quiddity, Enzian44, Érico, .js
- good work/great user; even contributed to Wikiversity
13 agreed (182 didn't mention this).NickK, Tilman2007, Alexanderps, Tony1, Meno25, Marcus Cyron, Marshallsumter, NahidSultan, Shanmugamp7, Taketa, Mellebga, Timk70, OrbiliusMagister
- trusted, reliable; competent
11 agreed (184 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter, Altkatholik62, Smial, Udo T., Shisha-Tom, Alexanderps, Rax, Taketa, OrbiliusMagister, Hégésippe Cormier, Ireas
- helpful (on de.wiktionary)
9 agreed (186 didn't mention this).Susann Schweden, Caligari, Yoursmile, Sionnach, Shanmugamp7, Taketa, Mellebga, OrbiliusMagister, Pmlineditor
- (very) active
7 agreed (188 didn't mention this).Gereon K., Avraham, Trijnstel, NahidSultan, Shanmugamp7, Taketa, Pmlineditor
- experienced/reasonable steward
6 agreed (189 didn't mention this).Altkatholik62, Rschen7754, Rax, Meno25, Barras, Pmlineditor
- no concerns/no issues
4 agreed (191 didn't mention this).Vogone, Cadfaell, Hedwig in Washington, Jo-Jo Eumerus
- excellent job with SUL finalisation
1 agreed (194 didn't mention this).NickK
Concerned
- no reason given
1 agreed (194 didn't mention this).Gerold Rosenberg
- "issues with how the confirmations went"
1 agreed (194 didn't mention this).Rschen7754
- unresponsive
1 agreed (194 didn't mention this).Kusurija
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (194 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 3 unspecified "neutral" comments (2 without reason, 1 because of not knowing enough about his steward work).
- Confirm. Nihil obstat. —MarcoAurelio 18:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - nihil obstat, no opposes related to steward work. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Clear-cut case here. RadiX∞ 20:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm; high support, virtually no concerns. SPQRobin (talk) 20:29, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Mardetanha talk 19:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:43, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Only 1 potentially relevant oppose reason. --MF-W 21:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 21:56, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm nihil obstat. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm no concerns. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:20, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:26, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Our most popular stewie :) ✒ Bennylin 02:28, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
77 users commented on Einsbor's confirmation, or 20.0% of participating users. Final revision r15388986.
Favourable
- no reason given
53 agreed (24 didn't mention this).NahidSultan, RadiX, Natuur12, Polimerek, Vituzzu, Wieralee, BRPever, Armbrust, Ajraddatz, Miniapolis, White Master King White, Az1568, Hedwig in Washington, Liuxinyu970226, Wikitanvir, Michał Sobkowski, Andrzei111, J.Dygas, Ptjackyll, Luke081515, Cybularny, Teles, MoiraMoira, Uğurkent, Micpol, Avraham, Kolega2357, Stanko, Widr, Maire, Ghilt, DCB, Devwebtel, Mo Cuishle, Melos, Matanya, GZWDer, Torrosbak, Courcelles, Matiia, Jusjih, Zyephyrus, Plogeo, Cynko, FrankyLeRoutier, Jo-Jo Eumerus, MarcoAurelio, 분당선M, Pablo000, Elmie, Wagino 20100516, Quiddity, Érico
- good activity
7 agreed (70 didn't mention this).Vogone, Rschen7754, NickK, Shanmugamp7, Taketa, Pmlineditor, Snowolf
- good steward/good work etc.
5 agreed (72 didn't mention this).Trijnstel, Barras, Taketa, Pmlineditor, Snowolf
- no (significant) concerns
5 agreed (72 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter, Jianhui67, NickK, Ankry, Ah3kal
- helpful
1 agreed (76 didn't mention this).Shanmugamp7
- trusted user
1 agreed (76 didn't mention this).Taketa
- helped process enwiki Arbcom elections faster than usual
1 agreed (76 didn't mention this).Altamel
Concerned
- low activity
1 agreed, 1 seconded (75 didn't mention this).Billinghurst[Green Giant]
- no reason given
1 agreed (76 didn't mention this).DerekvG
- has contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards
1 agreed (76 didn't mention this).Snaevar
- should be more active on plwiki
1 agreed (76 didn't mention this).Emptywords
- one communication issue
1 agreed (76 didn't mention this).Vogone
- not contributed to en.wv
1 agreed (76 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (76 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 3 neutral "comments" without reasons.
- Confirm. Nihil obstat. —MarcoAurelio 18:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus to keep, even with inactivity concerns. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:03, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Activity concerns were not too relevant. RadiX∞ 20:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Mardetanha talk 19:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:44, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. The people who brought potentially valid oppose reasons do support confirmation. --MF-W 21:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 21:56, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per consensus. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, no concerns. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, consensus to confirm. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:20, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:31, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
110 users commented on Hoo man's confirmation, or 28.6% of participating users. Final revision r15395304.
Favourable
- no reason given
73 agreed (37 didn't mention this).Syum90, Infinite0694, Gereon K., Natuur12, RadiX, Agruwie, Vituzzu, BRPever, Alan, Armbrust, 1971markus, Geolina163, Didi43, Ajraddatz, Riley Huntley, Miniapolis, Atcovi, White Master, Regiomontanus, Az1568, Hedwig in Washington, Liuxinyu970226, Legoktm, Andreas Werle, HakanIST, Wikitanvir, Danny B., Herbythyme, Pankoken, Billinghurst, Epìdosis, Luke081515, VINCENZO1492, Florianschmidtwelzow, Teles, MoiraMoira, DCB, Kolega2357, Holmium, Uğurkent, Widr, Itti, AleXXw, Aude, BeverlyHillsCop, -jkb-, Sänger, Arkanosis, Green Giant, Melos, Shivanarayana, Matanya, GZWDer, Krenair, Horgner, Microchip08, Courcelles, Berlin-George, Helfmann, Matiia, Mglaser, WS ReNu, Matěj Suchánek, Martin Kraft, Jo-Jo Eumerus, DerekvG, DangSunM, Tpt, Theo10011, Zyephyrus, MBisanz, Elmie, Wagino 20100516
- good steward/good work etc.; helpful
10 agreed, 1 seconded (99 didn't mention this).Jianhui67, Avraham, Rax, NahidSultan, Barras, Shanmugamp7, Taketa[MarcoAurelio], Timk70, Einsbor, Eurodyne
- "tech user"/good engineer
7 agreed, 1 seconded (102 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter, Rxy, Trijnstel[MarcoAurelio], Barras, Shanmugamp7, Taketa[MarcoAurelio], Pmlineditor
- friendly/nice
5 agreed, 1 seconded (104 didn't mention this).Rax, Trijnstel[MarcoAurelio], NahidSultan, Shanmugamp7, Eurodyne
- active
4 agreed, 1 seconded (105 didn't mention this).Rschen7754, Shanmugamp7, Taketa[MarcoAurelio], Pmlineditor
- trusted
3 agreed, 1 seconded (106 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter, Taketa[MarcoAurelio], Ireas
- no concerns/reasonable actions
3 agreed (107 didn't mention this).Vogone, Rschen7754, Bennylin
- finalised SUL
1 agreed (109 didn't mention this).NickK
- contributed to many wikis
1 agreed (109 didn't mention this).Snaevar
Concerned
- no babel info in the statement
1 agreed (109 didn't mention this).Jusjih
- no contributions to en.wikiversity since 2013
1 agreed (109 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (109 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 3 "neutral" comments (2 without reason, 1 because of not knowing enough about his steward work).
- Confirm. Nihil obstat. —MarcoAurelio 18:40, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - nihil obstat Ajraddatz (talk) 19:03, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Clear-cut case. RadiX∞ 20:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm; clear consensus, no valid concerns. SPQRobin (talk) 20:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Mardetanha talk 19:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:44, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 21:56, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. None of the concerns are relevant. --MF-W 22:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm nihil obstat. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:21, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:31, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Obvious result. ✒ Bennylin 02:33, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
68 users commented on Jyothis' confirmation, or 17.7% of participating users. Final revision r15395309.
Favourable
- no reason given
44 agreed (24 didn't mention this).Natuur12, Vituzzu, BRPever, Armbrust, Ajraddatz, Miniapolis, White Master, Atcovi, Az1568, Hedwig in Washington, Liuxinyu970226, Danny B., Billinghurst, Rxy, Luke081515, VINCENZO1492, Teles, MoiraMoira, Kolega2357, Uğurkent, Widr, Aude, Green Giant, Melos, Shivanarayana, Matanya, GZWDer, Courcelles, Jusjih, Jo-Jo Eumerus, MarcoAurelio, DerekvG, DangSunM, Theo10011, Zyephyrus, MBisanz, Bennylin, Wagino 20100516, Viswaprabha, Pharaoh of the Wizards, Quiddity, Pmlineditor, Taivo, Érico
- good activity
7 agreed (61 didn't mention this).Jianhui67, NickK, Avraham, Trijnstel, Barras, Snowolf, Fotokannan
- good steward/good work etc.; helpful
5 agreed (63 didn't mention this).Vogone, Wikitanvir, Avraham, Adv.tksujith, Snowolf
- no concerns/no issues
3 agreed (65 didn't mention this).Rschen7754, Wikitanvir, NickK
- trusted
2 agreed (66 didn't mention this).Taketa, Fotokannan
- experienced steward
1 agreed (67 didn't mention this).RadiX
- friendly
1 agreed (67 didn't mention this).Wikitanvir
Concerned
- no contribution to en.wikiversity since 2011
1 agreed (67 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
- power-obsessed
1 agreed (67 didn't mention this).AryanSogd
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (67 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 4 unspecified "neutral" comments (3 without reason, 1 because of not knowing enough about his steward work).
- Confirm. Nihil obstat. —MarcoAurelio 18:40, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. RadiX∞ 20:19, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - nihil obstat. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm; clear consensus. SPQRobin (talk) 20:47, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Mardetanha talk 19:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 21:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. None of the concerns are relevant. --MF-W 22:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm nihil obstat. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:31, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:25, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm according to consensus. ✒ Bennylin 02:42, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
82 users commented on Linedwell's confirmation, or 21.3% of participating users. Final revision r15388984.
Favourable
- no reason given
51 agreed (31 didn't mention this).Syum90, RadiX, Natuur12, Vituzzu, BRPever, Infinite0694, Armbrust, Ajraddatz, Miniapolis, White Master King, Az1568, Hedwig in Washington, Liuxinyu970226, Laurent Jerry, Billinghurst, Jianhui67, Rxy, MoiraMoira, Uğurkent, Widr, Schlum, Arkanosis, Remy34, Green Giant, Melos, Matanya, GZWDer, Mattho69, Courcelles, Matiia, Do not follow, Jusjih, Suprememangaka, Housterdam, FrankyLeRoutier, MarcoAurelio, DerekvG, Jo-Jo Eumerus, 분당선M, Zyephyrus, 0x010C, Kropotkine 113, Einsbor, Elmie, Yodaspirine, Wagino 20100516, La femme de menage, ContributorQ, Quiddity, Pmlineditor, Érico
- no concerns
9 agreed (73 didn't mention this).Vogone, Rschen7754, NickK, Avraham, Thibaut120094, Trijnstel, NahidSultan, Shanmugamp7, Teles
- good activity
5 agreed (77 didn't mention this).NickK, Barras, Shanmugamp7, Taketa, Snowolf
- good steward/good work etc.
3 agreed (79 didn't mention this).Taketa, Raphoraph, Snowolf
- trusted
3 agreed (79 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter, Taketa, Hégésippe Cormier
- helpful
1 agreed (81 didn't mention this).Barras
- francophone
1 agreed (81 didn't mention this).Taketa, Thémistocle
- legible to continue (sic)
1 agreed (81 didn't mention this).Wikitanvir
Concerned
- has contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards
1 agreed (81 didn't mention this).Snaevar
- not contributed to en.wv
1 agreed (81 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (81 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 2 neutral "comments" without reasons.
- Confirm. Nihil obstat. —MarcoAurelio 18:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. RadiX∞ 20:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm; clear consensus. SPQRobin (talk) 20:47, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Mardetanha talk 19:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 21:58, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. None of the concerns are relevant. --MF-W 22:34, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm nihil obstat. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:25, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
89 users commented on M7's confirmation, or 23.1% of participating users. Final revision r15389022.
Favourable
- no reason given
68 agreed (21 didn't mention this).Herbythyme, Infinite0694, Syum90, Natuur12, Vituzzu, BRPever, Alan, Aplasia, Armbrust, RadiX, Ajraddatz, Euphydryas, Miniapolis, White Master, Nicolabel, Az1568, Hedwig in Washington, Osiris, Liuxinyu970226, Dimitrij Kasev, Wikitanvir, Laurent Jerry, Etamni, Pracchia-78, Jianhui67, Rxy, Eumolpo, Teles, MoiraMoira, L736E, Sciking, Kolega2357, Shivanarayana, Uğurkent, Widr, Archenzo, Alexanderps, Pegasovagante, INeverCry, Triquetra, Ghilt, Green Giant, Melos, Matanya, GZWDer, Gordonrox24, M&A, Courcelles, Meno25, Matiia, Jusjih, Nioger, Jmvkrecords, MarcoAurelio, DerekvG, DangSunM, Theo10011, NahidSultan, Zyephyrus, Nungalpiriggal, MBisanz, Elmie, Bennylin, Wagino 20100516, Mailer diablo, Quiddity, Riottoso, Érico
- active, responsive; hard-working
6 agreed (83 didn't mention this).NickK, Avraham, Shanmugamp7, Taketa, Pmlineditor, Snowolf
- experienced steward
5 agreed (84 didn't mention this).NickK, Ejs-80, Shanmugamp7, Taketa, Pmlineditor
- worthy/good steward
4 agreed (85 didn't mention this).AryanSogd, Jo-Jo Eumerus, Taketa, Snowolf
- no concerns/no issues
4 agreed (85 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter, Rschen7754, Trijnstel, Barras
- nice, friendly, kind
4 agreed (85 didn't mention this).Billinghurst, OrbiliusMagister, Trijnstel, Shanmugamp7
- trusted
3 agreed (86 didn't mention this).Snaevar, Harlock81, Taketa
Concerned
- activity concerns
1 agreed (88 didn't mention this).Snaevar
- no contribution to en.wikiversity since 2008
1 agreed (88 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (88 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 2 unspecified "neutral" comments (1 without reason, 1 because of not knowing enough about his steward work).
- Confirm. Nihil obstat. —MarcoAurelio 18:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. No serious concerns. Overall good work as a steward. RadiX∞ 20:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - nihil obstat. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm; clear consensus. SPQRobin (talk) 20:48, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Oldest soldier still fighting Mardetanha talk 19:29, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 21:58, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. The only relevant concern is from Snaevar, who however supports confirmation. --MF-W 22:32, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm nihil obstat. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:25, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
99 users commented on MarcoAurelio's confirmation, or 25.7% of participating users. Final revision r15391106.
Favourable
- no reason given
63 agreed (36 didn't mention this).Maragm, Infinite0694, RadiX, Natuur12, Widr, Vituzzu, BRPever, Alan, Petronas, Armbrust, Taichi, Murma174, Miniapolis, Euphydryas, Az1568, Hedwig in Washington, Liuxinyu970226, Billinghurst, Rxy, Epìdosis, Luke081515, Vincenzo1492, Teles, MoiraMoira, L736E, Sciking, Kolega2357, Uğurkent, Bernard, La Mantis, Itti, Jan Kovář BK, Marcelo Victor, Aude, -jkb-, Ghilt, Arkanosis, Quenhitran, AryanSogd, Melos, Matanya, GZWDer, Krenair, Rax, Courcelles, Ciberprofe, Matiia, Jusjih, Nioger, Matěj Suchánek, Jmvkrecords, FrankyLeRoutier, DerekvG, 분당선M, Zyephyrus, Pafsanias, Accipiter Q. Gentilis, Turbojet, MBisanz, Elmie, Wagino 20100516, Quiddity, Érico
- definitely/of course/(one of the) best steward(s)/excellent user etc.
18 agreed (81 didn't mention this).Herbythyme, Syum90, Yeza, 6AND5, Ajraddatz, White Master King, Jianhui67, NickK, Snowolf, Einsbor, Bennylin, Laura Fiorucci, Green Giant, Trijnstel, Barras, Shanmugamp7, Theo10011, Taketa
- (very) active
8 agreed (91 didn't mention this).Pmlineditor, बिप्लब आनन्द , Avraham, Rschen7754, Wikitanvir, Shanmugamp7, Taketa, NahidSultan
- trusted
4 agreed (95 didn't mention this).Ah3kal, Ejs-80, Snaevar, Taketa
- no concerns
3 agreed (96 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter, Raystorm, Jo-Jo Eumerus
- helpful
1 agreed (98 didn't mention this).Pmlineditor
Concerned
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed, 1 seconded (97 didn't mention this).Auvajs[MariusM]
- Declined an allegedly valid CU request
1 agreed (98 didn't mention this).MariusM
- not contributed to en.wv
1 agreed (98 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
- 2 neutral "comments" without reasons.
- Confirm. RadiX∞ 20:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus to confirm. IMO the CU request was invalid and should have been declined, and the issue was not supported by anyone else. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm clear cut consensus Mardetanha talk 19:30, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 21:58, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. None of the oppose reasons are relevant. --MF-W 22:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm obvious consensus. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, concerns raised are not relevant. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:24, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:31, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:26, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm ✒ Bennylin 02:43, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
84 users commented on Mardetanha's confirmation, or 21.8% of participating users. Final revision r15391653.
Favourable
- no reason given
57 agreed (27 didn't mention this).Infinite0694, Syum90, Natuur12, Vituzzu, BRPever, Alan, RadiX, Armbrust, Miniapolis, White Master King, HakanIST, Gharouni, Az1568, Liuxinyu970226, Danny B., Laurent Jerry, Billinghurst, Jianhui67, Rxy, MoiraMoira, Kolega2357, Uğurkent, Widr, Darwinius, Jan Kovář BK, Aude, Calak, INeverCry, -jkb-, Ghilt, Melos, Matanya, GZWDer, Courcelles, Matiia, Taivo, Jusjih, Hamid Hassani, AzorAhai, Arian_Ar, Ebrahim, مهرنگار, کامران, Ochilov, Jmvkrecords, Jo-Jo Eumerus, MarcoAurelio, DerekvG, 분당선M, Theo10011, Zyephyrus, MBisanz, Elmie, Pharaoh of the Wizards, Quiddity, Pmlineditor, Érico
- trusted user
7 agreed (77 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter, Jagro, Cekli829, Alexanderps, Shanmugamp7, Taketa, Hégésippe Cormier
- good steward/good work etc.
5 agreed (79 didn't mention this).Cekli829, Avraham, Meno25, Taketa, Snowolf
- always/often around to help
5 agreed (79 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter, Trijnstel, Barras, Shanmugamp7, NahidSultan
- active
4 agreed (80 didn't mention this).Shanmugamp7, Taketa, NahidSultan, Snowolf
- useful language skills
4 agreed (80 didn't mention this).Trijnstel, Barras, Shanmugamp7, Snowolf
- No concerns
3 agreed (81 didn't mention this).Hedwig in Washington, Wikitanvir, Ah3kal
- س چی
1 agreed (83 didn't mention this).Raystorm
- Helped process the ArbCom elections on en.wiki faster than usual
1 agreed (83 didn't mention this).Altamel
- Helpful
1 agreed (83 didn't mention this).NickK
- positive reply to concerns
1 agreed (83 didn't mention this).Teles
Concerned
- Concerns about OS actions on Wikidata
2 agreed (82 didn't mention this).Rschen7754, Ajraddatz
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (83 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- not contributed to en.wv
1 agreed (83 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
- 1 neutral "comment" without reasons.
- Confirm. The concern raised wrt. OS at Wikidata looks resolved, and Mardetanha answered to the questions regarding this. It seems all agreed it was an urgent action, thus policy-endorsed. Mistakes (wrt. the use of the tool, hidding the summary or the revision) can happen, specially if the tool hasn't been used for a while and one's in a hurry. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio 18:51, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Despite some issues that seem to be properly addressed already, as MA said. Consensus to confirm, IMO. RadiX∞ 20:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus to confirm, though I am still concerned by the actions. Oversight actions are rarely so urgent, they can be revdel'd and dealt with later. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm; clear consensus, despite some concerns raised. SPQRobin (talk) 20:50, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. I believe the explanation, and we all make mistakes sometimes. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 21:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. The concern about the OS action is really very relevant. But if only 2 users share it (thereof 1 in favour of confirmation) ... --MF-W 22:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per consensus. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:25, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm concerns have been addressed. ✒ Bennylin 02:44, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus. Also agree with MarcoAurelio.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
63 users commented on Matanya's confirmation, or 16.4% of participating users. Final revision r15389017.
Favourable
- no reason given
41 agreed (22 didn't mention this).Syum90, RadiX, Vituzzu, Armbrust, Miniapolis, White Master, Az1568, Liuxinyu970226, Legoktm, Danny B., Laurent Jerry, Billinghurst, Rxy, Teles, MoiraMoira, Kolega2357, Uğurkent, Widr, Aude, INeverCry, -jkb-, Ghilt, Taivo, Melos, GZWDer, Krenair, Courcelles, Matiia, Trijnstel, Jusjih, Jmvkrecords, MarcoAurelio, DerekvG, Jo-Jo Eumerus, 분당선M, Theo10011, Zyephyrus, MBisanz, Wagino 20100516, Quiddity, Érico
- sufficient/good activity; fast responses
10 agreed, 2 seconded (51 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter[Riley Huntley, Hedwig in Washington], Rschen7754, Jianhui67, NickK, -revi, Barras, Shanmugamp7, Taketa, Pmlineditor, Snowolf
- good steward, sound steward/good work; helpful
7 agreed (56 didn't mention this).Natuur12, Nahum, Jianhui67, Barras, Shanmugamp7, Taketa, Snowolf
- trusted
3 agreed, 2 seconded (58 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter[Riley Huntley, Hedwig in Washington], Taketa, Pmlineditor
- no concerns
2 agreed (61 didn't mention this).NickK, Avraham
- careful
1 agreed (62 didn't mention this).Wikitanvir
- valuable technical expertise
1 agreed (62 didn't mention this).Snowolf
- nice
1 agreed (62 didn't mention this).NahidSultan
- contributions to Wikiversity in the past year
1 agreed (62 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
Concerned
- no reason given
1 agreed (62 didn't mention this).Severino
- contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards
1 agreed (62 didn't mention this).Snaevar
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (62 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 1 neutral "comment" without reason.
- Confirm. Nihil obstat. —MarcoAurelio 18:52, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. RadiX∞ 20:07, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm; no valid concerns. SPQRobin (talk) 20:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - nihil obstat. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm clear consensus Mardetanha talk 19:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 21:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. None of the oppose reasons are valid. --MF-W 22:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, no concerns. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:26, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm ✒ Bennylin 02:45, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
69 users commented on MBisanz's confirmation, or 17.9% of participating users. Final revision r15388982.
Favourable
- no reason given
37 agreed (32 didn't mention this).Natuur12, Vituzzu, Liridon, Armbrust, Pharaoh of the Wizards, White Master King, SQL, Az1568, Liuxinyu970226, Laurent Jerry, Jianhui67, MoiraMoira, Kolega2357, Holmium, Uğurkent, Widr, INeverCry, Charitwo, Philosopher, Melos, Matanya, GZWDer, Courcelles, Jmvkrecords, MarcoAurelio, Jo-Jo Eumerus, Taivo, 분당선M, Theo10011, Zyephyrus, Drmies, Wagino 20100516, Mailer diablo, Quiddity, Shanmugamp7, Érico, Wikitanvir
- hopes that MBisanz will become more active
2 agreed, 2 seconded (65 didn't mention this).Rschen7754[RadiX, Riley Huntley], Miniapolis
- willing to do difficult renames which require steward rights
2 agreed, 2 seconded (65 didn't mention this).Legoktm[Guerillero, NahidSultan], Barras
- active / not only active in renaming
4 agreed (65 didn't mention this).Teles, Avraham, Taketa, NahidSultan
- good contributions at the steward meeting in San Francisco 2015
3 agreed, 1 seconded (65 didn't mention this).Billinghurst, Teles, Trijnstel[Pmlineditor]
- "still contributes in the steward role overall" / "provides valuable perspective"
2 agreed (67 didn't mention this).Ajraddatz, Snowolf
- good steward/good work etc.
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).Tony1
- RL
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).Hedwig in Washington
- stewards with moderate activity are needed
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).NickK
- contributed to en.wv
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
Concerned
- global renamer rights would be sufficent
2 agreed, 4 seconded (63 didn't mention this).Vogone[Steinsplitter, DCB, CaZeRillo, Timk70], Barras
- inactivity / concerns about activity
5 agreed, 1 seconded (63 didn't mention this).Rschen7754, Ajraddatz, MF-Warburg, Stemoc[Herbythyme], Snowolf
- Concerns about unfamiliarity with checking user group rights on local wikis
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).Vogone
- "has contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards"
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).Snaevar
- English-only
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).Jusjih
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 1 neutral "comment" without reason.
- Confirm. The majority of the community favours confirmation of MBisanz. —MarcoAurelio 18:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. In spite of the "global renamer would suffice" argument, those who commented in favor have pointed out that he is willing to do difficult renames which require steward permission, and he is also active in other stuff as well. RadiX∞ 20:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - renaming is still part of steward work IMO. Consensus present to confirm. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Mardetanha talk 19:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 21:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Neutral. Several valid concerns, but probably not shared by a critical mass of users. --MF-W 22:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per majority. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, some concerns raised, but consensus to confirm. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - There are some concerns, however, the vast majority of the community wishes him confirmed. Consensus seems clear to me. -Barras talk 12:28, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus. Per Marco and MF.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
67 users commented on Melos' confirmation, or 17.4% of participating users. Final revision r15389016.
Favourable
- no reason given
48 agreed (19 didn't mention this).RadiX, Natuur12, Vituzzu, BRPever, Aplasia, Armbrust, Ajraddatz, Euphydryas, Miniapolis, White Master, Az1568, Liuxinyu970226, Dimitrij Kasev, Billinghurst, Pracchia-78, Jianhui67, Epìdosis, Rxy, Eumolpo. MoiraMoira, L736E, Teles, Kolega2357, Sciking, Shivanarayana, Uğurkent, Widr, Archenzo, Triquetra, Harlock81, Matanya, GZWDer, Syum90, Luigi.tuby, Courcelles, Matiia, Jmvkrecords, MarcoAurelio, DerekvG, 분당선M, NahidSultan, Zyephyrus, Nungalpiriggal, MBisanz, Wagino 20100516, DARIO SEVERI, Quiddity, Pmlineditor, Érico
- active enough: helpful
9 agreed (58 didn't mention this).Rschen7754, Avraham, NickK, Trijnstel, Barras, Jo-Jo Eumerus, Taketa, Shanmugamp7, Snowolf
- no concerns/reasonable actions; good work
6 agreed (61 didn't mention this).Rschen7754, NickK, Jo-Jo Eumerus, Taketa, Shanmugamp7, Snowolf
- useful insights
2 agreed (65 didn't mention this).Wikitanvir, Avraham
- trusted
2 agreed (65 didn't mention this).Trijnstel, Taketa
Concerned
- contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards/no contributions to en.wikiversity since 2011
2 agreed (65 didn't mention this).Snaevar, Marshallsumter
- no babel info in the statement
2 agreed (65 didn't mention this).Jusjih, OrbiliusMagister
- not visible
1 agreed (66 didn't mention this).Hedwig in Washington
- activity concerns
1 agreed (66 didn't mention this).Wikitanvir
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (66 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 2 "neutral" comments without reasons.
- Confirm. Nihil obstat. —MarcoAurelio 18:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. RadiX∞ 19:52, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, QuiteUnusual (talk) 12:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Mardetanha talk 19:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:42, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 22:00, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Only possibly relevant oppose reason is the one by Snaevar. --MF-W 22:18, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm nihil obstat. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:28, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:34, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
57 users commented on Mentifisto's confirmation, or 14.8% of participating users. Final revision r15388981.
Favourable
- no reason given
35 agreed (22 didn't mention this).Natuur12, Emergency doc, Vituzzu, BRPever, Ajraddatz, Miniapolis, White Master, Kurtis, Az1568, Osiris, Liuxinyu970226, Billinghurst, Jianhui67, MoiraMoira, Teles, Kolega2357, Uğurkent, Widr, INeverCry, Melos, Matanya, GZWDer, Gordonrox24, Mh7kJ, Courcelles, Matiia, MarcoAurelio, DerekvG, Jo-Jo Eumerus, 분당선M, Zyephyrus, MBisanz, Wagino 20100516, Mailer diablo, Érico
- active enough
7 agreed (50 didn't mention this).Rschen7754, Avraham, Trijnstel, Barras, Taketa, Pmlineditor, Snowolf
- useful/sound/good work
5 agreed, 1 seconded (51 didn't mention this).Wikitanvir, Avraham, NickK[NahidSultan], Taketa, Snowolf
- no reason to remove/no concerns
2 agreed (55 didn't mention this).RadiX, Shanmugamp7
- trusted user
2 agreed (55 didn't mention this).Infinite0694, Taketa
Concerned
- not as active as in the past/not noticed in the past
6 agreed, 1 seconded (50 didn't mention this).Rschen7754, Hedwig in Washington, Wikitanvir, Steinsplitter, NickK[NahidSultan], Barras
- no longer active on wikis/no contributions to en.wikiversity in over a year
2 agreed (55 didn't mention this).Laurent Jerry, Marshallsumter
- English-only
1 agreed (56 didn't mention this).Jusjih
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (56 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 3 unspecified "neutral" comments
- Confirm. There are some concerns with activity, but those who raised this favors confirmation. —MarcoAurelio 18:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Some concerns with current activity. However, there is consensus to confirm. RadiX∞ 19:51, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus to confirm, despite activity concerns. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, QuiteUnusual (talk) 12:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Mardetanha talk 19:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:43, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 22:00, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. The only relevant oppose reason is inactivity, but only 3 users think removal is warranted because of it. --MF-W 22:17, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm nihil obstat. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - While there are activity concerns, there is a clear consensus to confirm. -Barras talk 12:30, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:34, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:34, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Neutral, not the most noticable steward, judging from the number of participating votes. ✒ Bennylin 02:52, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
102 users commented on MF-Warburg's confirmation, or 26.5% of participating users. Final revision 15391655.
Favourable
- no reason given / ok / good job / trusted
83 agreed (19 didn't mention this).Vogone, Herbythyme, Steinsplitter, Cadfaell, Infinite0694, Syum90, Maragm, RadiX, Mh7kJ, Natuur12, Krol111, Brainswiffer, Emergency doc, Vituzzu, BRPever, Bubo bubo, Armbrust, 1971markus, Geolina163, Ajraddatz, Riley Huntley, Murma174, Miniapolis, White Master, HakanIST, Az1568, Osiris, Hedwig in Washington, Liuxinyu970226, Andreas Werle, Danny B., billinghurst, Jianhui67, Rxy, Vincenzo1492, MoiraMoira, DCB, NickK, Yogesh Kavishwar, Shisha-Tom, Kolega2357, Cvf-ps, Widr, Ah3kal, Itti, Ali1610, Jan Kovář, Aude, INeverCry, -jkb-, Ghilt, Snaevar, Sänger, Arkanosis, Quenhitran, Melos, Matanya, GZWDer, Horgner, Rax, Courcelles, GeoTrinity, Matiia, Do not follow, Marcus Cyron, Pedantin9, Nioger, Jmvkrecords, MarcoAurelio, Jo-Jo Eumerus, 분당선M, Theo10011, Zyephyrus, MBisanz, Elmie, Yodaspirine, Wagino 20100516, बिप्लब आनन्द, Vadgt, Pharaoh of the Wizards, S.Didam, Pmlineditor
- You do a good job, though I believe you could be more friendly with words.
4 agreed, 2 seconded (96 didn't mention this).Teles[Trijnstel], Barras, Shanmugamp7, Eurodyne
- Trusted, active, does good work.
1 agreed (101 didn't mention this).Taketa
- Active enough and actions were reasonable.
1 agreed (101 didn't mention this).Rschen7754
- active and dedicated steward.
1 agreed (101 didn't mention this).Snowolf
- No question. His activity is sufficient in and of itself, but I can speak from personal experience in saying that I think he delivers significant value to the stewards as regards our internal discussions. MF-W and I may not always agree, but I value his perspective and advice, and look forward to his thoughts on issues. His continuation as a steward would be a clear benefit to Wikimedia, in my opinion.
1 agreed (101 didn't mention this).Avraham
Concerned
- No contributions to en.wikiversity in over a year!
1 agreed (101 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
- for opposing 2 proposals at Requests for comment/Removal of bureaucrats in small wikis
1 agreed (101 didn't mention this).Jusjih
- for inactivity to several queries such as User_talk:MF-Warburg#Western_Balochi_language - we expect some reply - not a passive attitude.
1 agreed (101 didn't mention this).Hindustanilanguage
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (101 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 2 neutral "comments" without reasons.
- Confirm. Nihil obstat. —MarcoAurelio 19:00, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. RadiX∞ 19:45, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm; high support, no valid concerns. Thank you very much for creating these overviews! SPQRobin (talk) 20:11, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. Concern by Hindustanilanguage more likely in revenge for voting against his steward election, as he opposed all of the initial stewards that did not support him. Thanks too for making these! Ajraddatz (talk) 20:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, agree with Ajr re. the Hindustanilanguage concern. QuiteUnusual (talk) 12:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Mardetanha talk 19:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:43, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 22:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm nihil obstat. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, no concerns. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:34, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:30, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:34, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, but still need to address the concerns. ✒ Bennylin 02:50, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
60 users commented on Pmlineditor's confirmation, or 15.6% of participating users. Final revision r15389011.
Favourable
- no reason given
42 agreed (18 didn't mention this).Syum90, RadiX, Natuur12, Vituzzu, BRPever, Armbrust, Ajraddatz, Druddigon, Miniapolis, White Master King, Az1568, Osiris, Liuxinyu970226, Etamni, Billinghurst, Jianhui67, Luke081515, MoiraMoira, Teles, Kolega2357, Widr, Uğurkent, -jkb-, Melos, Matanya, GZWDer, Gordonrox24, Microchip08, Courcelles, Matiia, Jusjih, MarcoAurelio, Jo-Jo Eumerus, 분당선M, Zyephyrus, MBisanz, Elmie, Wagino 20100516, Ah3kal, Quiddity, Érico, Trijnstel
- (relatively low activity, but) still active enough
8 agreed (52 didn't mention this).Rschen7754, Avraham, NickK, Barras, Taketa, NahidSultan, Shanmugamp7, Snowolf
- good steward/good work etc.; helpful, friendly
3 agreed (57 didn't mention this).Taketa, Snowolf, NahidSultan
- no concerns
1 agreed (59 didn't mention this).Shanmugamp7
- speaks Bangla
1 agreed (59 didn't mention this).Wikitanvir
- trusted
1 agreed (59 didn't mention this).Taketa
Concerned
- Concerns about activity and the closing of a request with an unanswered question at SRGP as successful
2 agreed, 1 seconded (57 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter[Vogone, Hindustanilanguage]
- has contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards
1 agreed (59 didn't mention this).Snaevar
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (59 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 3 neutral "comments" (without reason).
- Confirm. —MarcoAurelio 19:03, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Overall good work as a steward, despite some minor concerns about activity and the way he handled a request at SRGP. Clear consensus to confirm, anyway. RadiX∞ 19:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, QuiteUnusual (talk) 12:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Mardetanha talk 19:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:44, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:53, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 22:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. One relevant concern, but too few people who support not confirming because of it. --MF-W 22:14, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per consensus. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:34, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:38, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
67 users commented on QuiteUnusual's confirmation, or 17.4% of participating users. Final revision r15389009.
Favourable
- no reason given / ok / good job / trusted
56 agreed (11 didn't mention this).Vogone, Herbythyme, Syum90, Infinite0694, RadiX, Natuur12, Widr, Vituzzu, BRPever, Alan, Armburst, Ajraddatz, Miniapolis, Atcovi, White Master, Kurtis, Az1568, Osiris, Hedwig in Washington, Liuxinyu970226, Wikitanvir, Laurent Jerry, MoiraMoira, Teles, Avraham, NickK, Mahir256, Kolega2357, Uğurkent, Quenhitran, Melos, Matanya, GZWDer, Courcelles, Matiia, Trijnstel, Jusjih, Nioger, Jmvkrecords, FrankyLeRoutier, MarcoAurelio, DerekvG, Jo-Jo Eumerus, 분당선M, NahidSultan, Zyephyrus, MBisanz, Wagino 20100516, Pharaoh of the Wizards, Mailer Diablo, Pmlineditor, Quiddity, DARIO SEVERI, Shanmugamp7, Érico
- Not as active as in the past but still active enough and remains involved in the community.
1 agreed (66 didn't mention this).Rschen7754
- easy, another wise wise head
1 agreed (66 didn't mention this).billinghurst
- A user with discernment
1 agreed (66 didn't mention this).Jianhui67
- Sufficiently active, benefit to steward corps, no reason to consider removal
1 agreed (66 didn't mention this).Avraham
- One of the few stewards that enforce the global inactivity policy
1 agreed (66 didn't mention this).Snaevar
- Contributions to en.wikiversity within a year!
1 agreed (66 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
- Clearly a net-positive to us stewards and also active and helpful.
1 agreed (66 didn't mention this).Barras
- active and sound steward.
1 agreed (66 didn't mention this).Snowolf
Concerned
- Putting obstacles in the way of small Wikipedias.
1 agreed (66 didn't mention this).Holder
- There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it.
1 agreed (66 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 2 neutral "comments" without reasons.
- Confirm. Nihil obstat. —MarcoAurelio 19:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. RadiX∞ 19:35, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - nihil obstat. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:28, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Mardetanha talk 19:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:53, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 22:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. None of the oppose reasons are relevant. --MF-W 22:12, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm nihil obstat. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:34, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:34, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:39, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
69 users commented on RadiX's confirmation, or 17.9% of participating users. Final revision r15388894.
Favourable
- no reason given
37 agreed (32 didn't mention this).Natuur12, Vituzzu, மதனாஹரன், Infinite0694, BRPever, Sfic, Armbrust, Atcovi, White Master King, Az1568, Laurent Jerry, Jianhui67, Yeza, MoiraMoira, Teles, Kolega2357, Widr, Marcelo Victor, Darwinius, INeverCry, Quenhitran, Harlock81, Melos, AryanSogd, Matanya, GZWDer, Matiia, Jusjih, Nioger, Vanthorn, FrankyLeRoutier, Jo-Jo Eumerus, Zyephyrus, Elmie, Taichi, Wagino 20100516, La femme de menage, Vonoserbizky Spartacus
- active enough / highly active when around
10 agreed, 1 seconded (58 didn't mention this).Rschen7754, Wikitanvir, Etamni, Avraham[NahidSultan], Érico, Barras, Taketa, Pmlineditor, Shanmugamp7, Snowolf
- good steward/good work etc.; helpful
6 agreed (63 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter, Syum90, Shanmugamp7, Taketa, Snowolf, Castelobranco
- no concerns
3 agreed (66 didn't mention this).Liuxinyu970226, Uğurkent, Shanmugamp7
- announced his planned absence
2 agreed, 1 seconded (66 didn't mention this).Hedwig in Washington[Érico], NickK
- trusted
3 agreed (66 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter, Syum90, Taketa
- friendly
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter
- hopes RadiX will become more active
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).Miniapolis
- Contributions to en.wv within a year
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
Concerned
- inactivity, e.g. belated signing of the new confidentiality agreement
3 agreed, 3 seconded (63 didn't mention this).Vogone[Steinsplitter, 분당선M, Timk70], MF-Warburg[분당선M], Billinghurst
- announced absence for 5 of 12 months of the next year
1 agreed, 3 seconded (65 didn't mention this).Vogone[Steinsplitter, 분당선M, Timk70]
- no reason given
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).DerekvG
- "same problems as in 2011-2"
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).JSSX
- Not fully convinced
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).Trijnstel
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (68 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 1 neutral "comment" (without reason).
- Confirm. I think there's consensus to confirm RadiX as steward. —MarcoAurelio 19:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - consensus to confirm, even with concerns on activity. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:28, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, no concerns re activity. QuiteUnusual (talk) 12:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Mardetanha talk 19:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm though not happy with the announced long absence. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 22:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. The only relevant oppose reason is inactivity, but it is only shared by few users. --MF-W 22:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm please take into account long absence periods. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, same as Matanya. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, consensus to confirm. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:34, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - There seems to be consensus to confirm. -Barras talk 12:34, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:34, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:43, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per consensus. Concerns about inactivity shared by only a few.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:54, 11 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
66 users commented on Ruslik0's confirmation, or 17.1% of participating users. Final revision r15388895.
Favourable
- no reason given
40 agreed (26 didn't mention this).Syum90, Emergency doc, Vituzzu, BRPever, Alan, Armbrust, Ajraddatz, Miniapolis, White Master, Az1568, Hedwig in Washington, Laurent Jerry, Billinghurst, Jianhui67, Rxy, MoiraMoira, Teles, Draa kul, Kolega2357, Cvf-ps, Oleg3280, Uğurkent, Widr, INeverCry, -jkb-, Melos, Matanya, GZWDer, Afil, Рулин, Matiia, Jusjih, MarcoAurelio, Jo-Jo Eumerus, 분당선M, Zyephyrus, MBisanz, Elmie, Wagino 20100516, Quiddity
- active
11 agreed (55 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter, Mathanaharan, Wikitanvir, Avraham, Trijnstel, Barras, Taketa, NahidSultan, Pmlineditor, Shanmugamp7, Snowolf
- trusted
7 agreed (59 didn't mention this).Steinsplitter, Mathanaharan, Trijnstel, Taketa, NahidSultan, बिप्लब आनन्द, Pmlineditor
- good steward/"very well"/"I like his steward work"
6 agreed (60 didn't mention this).Liuxinyu970226, Wikitanvir, RadiX, Yogesh Kavishwar, AryanSogd, Taketa
- useful/helpful
4 agreed (62 didn't mention this).Rschen7754, Avraham, Barras, Snowolf
- no concerns/no issues
2 agreed (64 didn't mention this).Vogone, Steinsplitter
- "helped me rename my username according to the rules"/"renamed me"
2 agreed (64 didn't mention this).Kosta1986, Cybularny
- Russian-speaking
1 agreed (65 didn't mention this).6AND5
- contributions to en.wikiversity within a year
1 agreed (65 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
Concerned
- concerns about communication
4 agreed (62 didn't mention this).Rschen7754, Mathanaharan, RadiX, AryanSogd
- no reason given
1 agreed (65 didn't mention this).DerekvG
- putting obstacles in the way of small Wikipedias
1 agreed (65 didn't mention this).Holder
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (65 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 1 "neutral" comment without reason.
- Confirm. —MarcoAurelio 19:06, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. In spite of some concerns about communication, I think there is consensus to keep him as a steward. Ruslik0 is considered to be a skilled and helpful volunteer, and thus should not be considered for removal, IMO. RadiX∞ 19:34, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus to confirm despite issues with communication. My own experience with his communication has been positive, for what it's worth. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:29, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, I have had no issues with communication. QuiteUnusual (talk) 12:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Mardetanha talk 19:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 22:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Communication issues are the only relevant oppose reason mentioned, but only 1 user thinks he should be removed because of it. --MF-W 22:09, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm clear consensus. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:34, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:34, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:44, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:32, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm should have had more votes for his works. ✒ Bennylin 02:55, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per MF-Warburg.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:02, 11 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
78 users commented on Savh's confirmation, or 20.3% of participating users. Final revision r15389006.
Favourable
- no reason given
48 agreed (30 didn't mention this).Syum90, Infinite0694, RadiX, Mh7kJ, Natuur12, Widr, Vituzzu, BRPever, Alan, Taichi, Armbrust, Ajraddatz, Riley Huntley, Euphydryas, Jcaraballo, Miniapolis, Az1568, Osiris, Jianhui67, Rxy, MoiraMoira, Teles, Kolega2357, Marcelo Victor, Bernard, PetrohsW, INeverCry, Charitwo, Baiji, Melos, Matanya, GZWDer, Courcelles, Meno25, Matiia, Nioger, Jmvkrecords, DerekvG, Jo-Jo Eumerus, 분당선M, Theo10011, Zyephyrus, MBisanz, Wagino 20100516, Mailer diablo, Quiddity, Taivo, Érico
- no concerns
9 agreed (69 didn't mention this).Cadfaell, Yeza, Raystorm, Liuxinyu970226, BAICAN XXX, NickK, Uğurkent, MarcoAurelio, NahidSultan
- sufficiently active
8 agreed (70 didn't mention this).Rschen7754, Avraham, NickK, Barras, Taketa, Pmlineditor, Shanmugamp7, Snowolf
- good steward / good work etc.
4 agreed (74 didn't mention this).Laura Fiorucci, Avraham, Taketa, Snowolf
- useful and helpful
4 agreed (74 didn't mention this).Wikitanvir, Barras, Pmlineditor, Shanmugamp7
- trusted user
3 agreed (75 didn't mention this).Snaevar, Trijnstel, Taketa
- good contributions at steward meeting in San Francisco 2015
1 agreed (77 didn't mention this).Billinghurst
Concerned
- No reason given
2 agreed (76 didn't mention this).Maragm, White Master King
- no babel info in the statement
1 agreed (77 didn't mention this).Jusjih
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (77 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 2 neutral "comments" without reasons.
- Confirm. Nihil obstat. —MarcoAurelio 19:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Clear consensus here, IMO. RadiX∞ 19:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm; clear consensus, no valid concerns. SPQRobin (talk) 20:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - nihil obstat. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:29, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, QuiteUnusual (talk) 12:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Mardetanha talk 19:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:55, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 22:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. None of the oppose reasons are relevant. --MF-W 22:07, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm nihil obstat. Matanya (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. Linedwell (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, nihil obstat. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:33, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - clear consensus. -Barras talk 12:35, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. MBisanz talk 20:46, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, einsbor talk 07:32, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm per clear consensus.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:02, 11 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
76 users commented on Shanmugamp7's confirmation, or 19.7% of participating users. Final revision r15395388.
Favourable
- no reason given
52 agreed (24 didn't mention this).Syum90, Infinite0694, RadiX, Natuur12, Widr, Vituzzu, BRPever, மதனாஹரன், Taichi, Armbrust, Nan, Ajraddatz, Riley Huntley, Pharaoh of the Wizards, White Master King, Miniapolis, Az1568, Legoktm, Rsmn, Shrikarsan, Billinghurst, Maathavan, Rxy, MoiraMoira, Kolega2357, Sivakosaran, Shivanarayana, Uğurkent, INeverCry, Kurumban, Melos, Matanya, GZWDer, Luke081515, Courcelles, AntanO, बिप्लब आनन्द, Matiia, Mh7kJ, Jusjih, Jmvkrecords, MarcoAurelio, DerekvG, Jo-Jo Eumerus, 분당선M, Theo10011, கி.மூர்த்தி, Zyephyrus, MBisanz, Wagino 20100516, Quiddity, Érico
- (very) active, good work
12 agreed (64 didn't mention this).Rschen7754, Avraham, NickK, Ravidreams, Trijnstel, Barras, Taketa, NahidSultan, Pmlineditor, Snowolf, Info-farmer, Altamel
- no concerns
6 agreed (70 didn't mention this).Vogone, Steinsplitter, Ah3kal, Liuxinyu970226, Wikitanvir, NickK
- friendly/nice/helpful
5 agreed (71 didn't mention this).Jianhui67, Teles, Trijnstel, NahidSultan, Pmlineditor
- trusted user
1 agreed (75 didn't mention this).Taketa
- useful language skills
1 agreed (75 didn't mention this).Taketa
- Contributed to en.wv
1 agreed (75 didn't mention this).Marshallsumter
Concerned
- blanket oppose against all stewards because of alleged harassment
1 agreed (75 didn't mention this).Auvajs
- 3 neutral "comments" without reasons.
- Confirm. Nihil obstat. —MarcoAurelio 19:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. No issues. RadiX∞ 19:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm; no valid concerns. SPQRobin (talk) 20:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm - nihil obstat. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, QuiteUnusual (talk) 12:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm, per consensus. Savhñ 14:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Ruslik (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Mardetanha talk 19:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm. Melos (talk) 20:55, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Confirm Nothing raised which would change my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 22:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)