Jump to content

Steward requests/Checkuser: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
Line 10: Line 10:
=== Haoloaholoa@zh.wikipedia ===
=== Haoloaholoa@zh.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
{{CU request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|status = done<!--don't change this line-->
|language code = zh
|language code = zh
|project shortcut= w
|project shortcut= w
Line 28: Line 28:
:Have any steward in here?--[[User:MCC214|'''<span style="color: #6666FF;">MCC214</span>''']][[User talk:MCC214|'''<font color="#0af">Talk with me</font>''']]#[[Special:Contributions/MCC214|'''Contributions with me''']] 09:56, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
:Have any steward in here?--[[User:MCC214|'''<span style="color: #6666FF;">MCC214</span>''']][[User talk:MCC214|'''<font color="#0af">Talk with me</font>''']]#[[Special:Contributions/MCC214|'''Contributions with me''']] 09:56, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
:{{doing}} &mdash;&nbsp;regards, [[User:-revi|<span style="color:green;font-family:Courier new, serif;font-variant:small-caps">Revi</span>]] 13:45, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
:{{doing}} &mdash;&nbsp;regards, [[User:-revi|<span style="color:green;font-family:Courier new, serif;font-variant:small-caps">Revi</span>]] 13:45, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

{{User:-revi/quote|Completed.

* {{confirmed}}: Haoloaholoa, 母豬蔡, 拉丁大師, Zhong-Gneoz, 前進奮鬥
* {{likely}} to ^: Zt2fdfsv<ref>This one has no contribs, but technical details and timing is suspicious.</ref>
* Wszgr exclusively used open proxy.
* Andyonce is technically {{unrelated}} with this check groups. {{unlikely}} - {{possible}} borderline with Tsiusing106 socks.

}}

&mdash;&nbsp;regards, [[User:-revi|<span style="color:green;font-family:Courier new, serif;font-variant:small-caps">Revi</span>]] 14:10, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}}


=== Jun1024@zh.wikipedia ===
=== Jun1024@zh.wikipedia ===

Revision as of 14:11, 12 October 2018

Shortcut:
SRCU
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}:  Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale
{{Declined}}:  Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}:  It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball

This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also requesting checkuser access). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.

Before making a request:

  1. Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.
  2. Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using diff links or other evidence.
  3. Make sure there are no local checkusers.
  4. Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:


How to make a request

How to make a request:

  • Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also {{srcu}} help).
    === Username@xx.project ===
    {{CU request
     |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
     |language code   = 
     |project shortcut= 
     |user name1      = 
     |user name2      = 
     |user name3      = 
    <!-- Max 10 users -->
     |discussion      = [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
     |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
    }}
    

    For example:

    === Example@en.wikipedia ===
    {{CU request
     |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
     |language code   = en
     |project shortcut= w
     |user name1      = Example
     |user name2      = Foo
     |user name3      = Bar
    <!-- Max 10 users -->
     |discussion      = [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
     |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
    }}
    
  • Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.
Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests

Haoloaholoa@zh.wikipedia


Sidenote by 1233: This was endorsed by other users but I am the one who translate it.--1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 09:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for translation 1233--Cohaf (talk) 19:27, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am now endorsing this as there are more signs showing it utilizing sockpuppets.--1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 15:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Have any steward in here?--MCC214Talk with me#Contributions with me 09:56, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Doing... — regards, Revi 13:45, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Completed.

  •  Confirmed: Haoloaholoa, 母豬蔡, 拉丁大師, Zhong-Gneoz, 前進奮鬥
  • Likely Likely to ^: Zt2fdfsv[1]
  • Wszgr exclusively used open proxy.
  • Andyonce is technically Unrelated Unrelated with this check groups. Unlikely Unlikely - Possible Possible borderline with Tsiusing106 socks.

— regards, Revi 14:10, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. This one has no contribs, but technical details and timing is suspicious.

Jun1024@zh.wikipedia

  • no proper local discussion was done for this case yet, request to be placed on hold. --Cohaf (talk) 19:28, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Meta CU is used to only confirm a connection once behavioral evidence has been established, not to be used to see if there is technical evidence that connects these accounts, which is often not so reliable on its own. If there aren't any zh.wiki administrators taking action, perhaps behavioral wise it's not that similar in the first place. Alex Shih (talk) 09:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For the references, I expect at least more than two or three days of discussion on non-urgent case, and (usually) do check if the discussion is mature enough. — regards, Revi 14:39, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@-revi and Alex Shih:update: accounts duck blocked, but local sysop request a sleeper check. I don't have the rationale for the check yet.--Cohaf (talk) 12:50, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Simon 1996@zh.wikipedia

  • comment:behaviour not that similar should be the correct translation.--Cohaf (talk) 07:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well like I said on the local discussion page, there is probably no merit to check. Both using machine translations and having the habit of removing other editor's comments on their talk page are not legitimate reasons when literally everything else is different. Alex Shih (talk) 08:17, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Alex ShihThis check is well discussed and many users had the same opinion that is to check, I guess it will be best to go by consensus. Just to add, it is not removing comments but alteration of comments in a certain way that connects both. The translation above is not that accurate per say. I am sorry I didn't knew this was submitted that I would had presented the case better, but anyways the key locus of behavioural similarities are as follows: threats after being banned over email, poor machine translations, alteration of talk page messages, participation in contests in Chinese Wikipedia. I am sorry I can't type a better statement as I am currently on mobile for this entire month. --Cohaf (talk) 11:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Renew2018 (Jessechi) @zh.wikipedia 2

See also