Jump to content

Steward requests/Checkuser

Edit links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by EPIC (talk | contribs) at 18:01, 3 April 2024 (→Mahbubslt@bn.wikibooks: results). It may differ significantly from the current version.
Shortcut:
SRCU
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}:  Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale

{{Declined}}:  Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}:  It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball

This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also requesting checkuser access). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.

Before making a request:

  1. Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.
  2. Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using diff links or other evidence.
  3. Make sure there are no local checkusers.
  4. Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:


How to make a request

How to make a request:

  • Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also {{srcu}} help). 
    === Username@xx.project ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = 
 |project shortcut= 
 |user name1      = 
 |user name2      = 
 |user name3      = 
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
 |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
}}

    For example: 

    === Example@en.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = en
 |project shortcut= w
 |user name1      = Example
 |user name2      = Foo
 |user name3      = Bar
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
 |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
}}
  • Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.
Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests

Jasonc9710@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Jasonc9710 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
CharlesJ2024 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Knowledge2761 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Charle2024 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Jasonc9710,CharlesJ2024 and Knowledge2761 edit the same article with exactly the same edit summary and same typo in content. Jasonc9710 and CharlesJ2024 was created within 24 hours. Charle2024 claimed Jasonc9710=Knowledge2761=CharlesJ2024 in Charle2024's user page in the same day of local discussion. Ask for checking if Charle2024 is sock of above three or not and if there any sleeper sock. Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 03:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In relation to this, could you explain why it is so urgent that the request is made without the input of local clerks, or whether there is reason to distrust them? --Sotiale (talk) 04:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would endorse the request on the basis of their editing patterns. As to why they decided to directly ping other users for a community consensus request (which I don't even see an obvious consensus) and not even try to ping clerks if it is any urgent is really not understandable. Do please proceed with the checkuser though. LuciferianThomas 10:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even with the clerk team's consent, this request does not have a proper SPI link nor can it confirm the discussion. I request that the requester provide a good reason, otherwise this request should be closed. --Sotiale (talk) 10:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sotiale: I think Cmsth11126a02 has accidentally put the link of the deprecated HAM as the link of SPI, and I have just fixed it. Sorry for any inconvenience caused. Sanmosa Outdia 10:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Knowledge6127, CosmoPolice, Wikijanedia, Knowledge2761, Jasonc9710, CharlesJ2024, KiraGcn
  •  Confirmed Group 2: GGbondZeroAD, GGbondZeroOO, GGbondZero
  • Likely Likely Group 1 and 2
  • Unlikely Unlikely Charle2024 and Group 1, 2
  • Some users are using VPNs.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diraged3@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Biblbrocs (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
星野源夢 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Compare with 星野源夢 group, similar editing patterns after B gamed their way to autoconfirmed. LuciferianThomas 10:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Biblbrocs, Diraged3, 星野源夢
  • They're using VPNs.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mahbubslt@bn.wikibooks

Status:    Done
List of users
Mahbubslt (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Ahmedbnp (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Isla-org (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): An article on Wikibooks is under discussion for deletion due to suspected self-promotion and original research. A newly registered account has commented in favor of keeping the article in its first edit, following a comment from the page creator, Mahbubslt. I suspect they may be the same user, given the similarity in their writing styles. The creator might be attempting to manipulate the deletion process by using multiple accounts. Please note that Mahbubslt previously created an account for his organization, which was blocked for violating the username policy. —MdsShakil (talk) 17:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MdsShakil: Mahbubslt and Isla-org are  Confirmed along with Tahercoxbd. Ahmedbnp is technically Unrelated Unrelated to either of these accounts. Other than that, no additional sockpuppets found. EPIC (talk) 18:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser&oldid=26538525"