Steward requests/Checkuser: Difference between revisions

Edit links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
MCC214 (talk | contribs)
3,015 edits
Line 41: Line 41:
=== Ansonlofans@zh.wikipedia ===
=== Ansonlofans@zh.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
{{CU request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|status = done<!--don't change this line-->
|language code = zh
|language code = zh
|project shortcut= w
|project shortcut= w
Line 50: Line 50:
|discussion = [[:w:zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#Ansonlofans]]
|discussion = [[:w:zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#Ansonlofans]]
|reason = It seems possible that the above accounts are controlled by the same person using sock puppet. However, it can not be ducked due to the article they insist to recreate (though local consensus state to leave a redirect only) is notable in some point but not notable enough according to local standards. <span style="border-radius:99px;background:#9F9;padding:0 35px;" title="Reply" lang="en">[[User:1233|1233]]</span> &#124; [[User_talk:1233| Questions?]]&#124; <small>This message is left by him at </small> 06:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
|reason = It seems possible that the above accounts are controlled by the same person using sock puppet. However, it can not be ducked due to the article they insist to recreate (though local consensus state to leave a redirect only) is notable in some point but not notable enough according to local standards. <span style="border-radius:99px;background:#9F9;padding:0 35px;" title="Reply" lang="en">[[User:1233|1233]]</span> &#124; [[User_talk:1233| Questions?]]&#124; <small>This message is left by him at </small> 06:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
}}

{{User:-revi/quote|Completed..
* {{Likely}} Carmen Li.S.M, Joeyeung1984
* {{Unrelated}} Ansonlofans
----
This is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence. No sleepers '''--'''[[User:علاء |<font size="3" face="Script MT Bold" style="color:black;">Alaa</font> ]] [[User_talk:علاء |:)..!]] 20:54, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
}}
}}


Revision as of 20:54, 25 March 2019

Shortcut:
SRCU
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}:  Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale
{{Declined}}:  Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}:  It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball

This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also requesting checkuser access). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.

Before making a request:

  1. Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.
  2. Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using diff links or other evidence.
  3. Make sure there are no local checkusers.
  4. Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:


How to make a request

How to make a request:

  • Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also {{srcu}} help). 
    === Username@xx.project ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = 
 |project shortcut= 
 |user name1      = 
 |user name2      = 
 |user name3      = 
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
 |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
}}

    For example: 

    === Example@en.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = en
 |project shortcut= w
 |user name1      = Example
 |user name2      = Foo
 |user name3      = Bar
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
 |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
}}
  • Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.
Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests

Albert20009@zh.wikipedia

Status:    On hold
List of users
Albert20009 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alberteffendy90900 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Isyanasarasvati90999 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Request to prolong this user's autoblock if possible. Recently its socks are very active on several articles, such as this one (notice accounts with username start with "Albert"). A list of discovered socks is available here. Please notify me if such requests can't be submitted through this page. Techyan（Talk） 00:57, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Autoblocks aren't configurable through wiki interface; it is configuration settings. — regards, Revi 07:14, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Let me try to explain it in a clearer manner. This user is socking prolifically, the list of socks are found here. Based on local Checkuser policy [1], a CU can be conducted to find out the underlying IP / ranges of IP of all the accounts and then do a CU block (which must then be oversighted) to prevent new socks accounts to be created from the IP / ranges. This is what we are requesting. Anymore details do co-ordinate with Techyan. I am here to just explain on behalf what exactly is needed in more details. Best Regards, --Cohaf (talk) 18:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ↑

    检查已封禁的账户所使用的IP，便于延长自动封禁

    translation

    Check the IP addresses of blocked users, so as to extend the autoblock(s) accordingly

@Techyan: can you list the most recent 2 - 3 socks this user is using, sorry I am not that well to go through the list. Thanks.--Cohaf (talk) 18:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not stale:
Alberteffendy22333 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alberteffendy40555 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alberteffendy70335 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alberteffendy89995 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alberteffendy90551 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alberteffendy92996 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alberteffendy92999 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alberteffendy95881 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Albert20229 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 11:29, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
On hold pending some related internal discussions. — regards, Revi 03:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@-revi and Cohaf: Ctrl+F on this page and look for keyword "Albert". All recently discovered socks edited this page. Please block their IPs if what they are using are concentrate enough, or more ideally, all of them are using the same IP, and immediately oversight block logs - that's what we have always been done on zhwiki. --Techyan（Talk） 03:42, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It is allowed to block the underlying IP or range of IPs to prevent abuse, as specified in the Access to nonpublic personal data policy s.4(b)(v) - "the public, when it is a necessary and incidental consequence of blocking a sockpuppet or other abusive account". It is more complicated in this case because it is against our policies to take actions that a sysop could take (local blocks) when there are local admins who could perform them. This request is still on hold for the time being, as it is still under discussion. – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:23, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Question Question: It seems that "extend the auto block" means "check the IP and enforce the CU block (if possible)". I have checked the log and I've found out that some stewards had done something similar before (though some of the logs have been removed). --云间守望 13:59, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ajraddatz and -revi:Any updates? Thanks.--Cohaf (talk) 07:17, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ansonlofans@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Ansonlofans (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Carmen Li.S.M (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Joeyeung1984 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): It seems possible that the above accounts are controlled by the same person using sock puppet. However, it can not be ducked due to the article they insist to recreate (though local consensus state to leave a redirect only) is notable in some point but not notable enough according to local standards. 1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 06:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Completed..

  • Likely Likely Carmen Li.S.M, Joeyeung1984
  • Unrelated Unrelated Ansonlofans

This is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence. No sleepers --Alaa :)..! 20:54, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

See also

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser&oldid=18967238"