Steward requests/Global permissions
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).
Quick navigation:Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests for global rollback permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Requests for global sysop permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global sysop for Tulsi Bhagat
- Global user: Tulsi Bhagat (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 19 March 2020 09:32 UTC
- Transparency: Steward requests/Global permissions/2019-03#Global sysop for Tulsi Bhagat
Hello! Many thanks for putting your trust in me. To be honest, my activity is limited since I received GR. It's because of events and outreach i took part on (page is not up-to-date). Hopefully, I am active on various IRC channels and keep on monitoring xWiki for vandals, spam or LTAs. I've 0.65 xWikiness. I would like to request GS a bit to directly deal with spambots/xWikivandals/LTAs whenever they appears. I've read and understood the GS policy and information, and I assure you I will abide by it. Additionally, the timezone UTC+5:45 i am living in, will surely benefit. Also, I am experienced of using sysop toolkit being an admin here on Meta-Wiki, Wikimedia Commons, etc. I hope the community would give me chance to serve as a GS too.
PS, My name is Tulsi Bhagat, and I am not a cross-wiki abuse. Thank you for your consideration! Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support no concerns. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:37, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support, qualified, with good matrix/xwikiness across Wikimedia projects, and of course much needed language skill.--AldnonymousBicara? 09:38, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Reconfirming my opinion (!vote), I know there are some concern about Tulsi's past, but from what I see from his flags as commons-meta-wikipedia admins he never abuse it, especially SWMT related matters the GR, he use it correctly, this is the base of my trust, after that mistake he did in the past, he never do it again, and contribute high quality contribution like outreach matters and identifying spam in language we don't understand (especially in south asian language), if I can get help from Tulsi, why not?--AldnonymousBicara? 10:21, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Well qualified, active in crosswiki work. The issues from 1st application is more or less resolved. Thanks for volunteering.--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Несмир Кудилович (разговор) 10:49, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Minorax (talk) 10:53, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support -J. Ansari Talk 15:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support - Definitely. FitIndia Talk Commons 16:55, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support improved exponentially —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 16:56, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Sure! Proficient and trusted user, I'm happy to support. Thanks for your work. —Sgd. Hasley 20:23, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support. Sure. Hiàn (talk) 20:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Problematic history, previously globally locked, and an ever growing attempt to gain more rights. Nihlus 22:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Qualified and active across many wikis. I haven't have a pleasure to meet him before tho. Good luck! Nadzik (talk) 22:11, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Geonuch (talk) 02:55, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Nihlus' first point is old and no longer valid, I think he's moved on from being globally locked, and I do not downscore legitimate requests for rights. Other than the activity part, I think you're good to go. Leaderboard (talk) 06:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Doing good work and having them the right will be obviously helpful. On a side note, I don't think you need to mention that "I am not a crosswiki abuser" part anymore. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:11, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Weak support per 1997kB. -- CptViraj (📧) 12:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support can be trusted with the rights --DannyS712 (talk) 06:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm sorry but I cannot support this request due to the past issues especially as GS is very difficult to monitor across hundreds of wikis. I'm also put off by the numerous rights requests over the past several years and I generally don't accuse people of aiming for certain roles but I suspect that running for steward is next. The attitude (bordering on a tantrum) displayed at Meta:Requests for adminship/Tulsi Bhagat was also not what I would expect from an administrator. --Rschen7754 07:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Although I generally agree with good faith with "support", your previous history is far too large to give you such a high level of permission. You committed extreme abuse in 2017 (3 years ago) and then claimed that your account was hacked. In different discussions you made different statements. The community, (including myself) has already given you a lot of trust with global rollback. After the past incidents, I even find it wrong that you are a already local sysop in 4 projects. In a few years you may be given such permission, but not in the near future.--𐐎ℹ𝕜ⅈ𝕭𝒂𝕪ⅇ𝕣 👤💬 09:45, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support - per 1997kB. --Ashok Talk 11:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- I thought about this for a while and I was not sure during his meta RFA because of the concern mentioned above but he has been active and useful in that role so I think I will lean towards support this time. Support.--BRP ever 09:42, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose concerned about their attitude, asking people to stop "wasting time" and "to move on" while teaching that "those who look only to the past is seriously missing the best things to be happen in future". The past is the past, but the main protagonist of a controversial incident is not in the position to overlook the issue and even negatively judge those who still take it in consideration.--Sakretsu (炸裂) 13:56, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --*Youngjin (talk) 22:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support I'm giving support as he should be trusted at this time though there is something bad before. --Hamish 05:41, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Support--He is a good User. WikipedianSorjo (talk) 06:07, 16 March 2020 (UTC)- Striken out LTA vote.--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:11, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support 轻语者 (talk) 13:04, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Meets my criteria. Thank you for volunteering, Vermont (talk) 15:50, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Rschen7754. --Herby talk thyme 16:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support A bit late to the party but I think that Tulsi Bhagat would be a net positive as GS. I understand the concerns of those that oppose this requests; however the lock is old and I believe that people do change after these years - at least Tulsi Bhagat did, and the behavioural concerns might be valid however I am sure that this is something that can be improved and isn't too strong to be an issue for me. On the other hand I see an experienced and competent user that can be helpful as GS. I totally agree with the arguments of the other support !votes. --Kostas20142 (talk) 11:05, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support has sysop elsewhere on projects where having sysop is a bigger deal than global sysop, so I see no need to restrict this right which really doesn’t do much despite having an impressive title. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:39, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Requests for global rename permissions
Steward requests/Global permissions/Global renamers
Global rename for Chansey
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: chansey (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 1 April 2020 19:09 UTC
Hello. I am Chansey from trwiki. First of all I am neither a sysop nor bureaucrat. I am a local patrol. I am a Turkish native speaker also I can speak English. I like to help users on my home wiki and I describe myself a vandalism fighter. I like to contribute for establishing a healthy project for good purpose and I believe Wikipedia can improve with mutual communication. I realized that no user is global renamer who is Turkish native speaker (only one native speaker steward on duty). I would like to be volunteer for helping users who request for renaming, especially Turkish speakers. I read policy several times and its soul is not so much different from our local policy. Yes, I know we are a developing wiki (but have too much potential), there is not so much request from us, however it will change. Trwiki is expanding. You might concern about my edit counter on meta but I believe I should edit my home wiki first for gain experience and I know the Wiki system, I am a good reader. So I want to serve as a volunteer to all Wikipedia users globally. I encourage myself. Thanks for your precious comments in advance. Regards. Chansey (talk) 19:09, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Question: @Chansey: Hey, Nice to see your willingness to offer help with username changes, but before I make my mind could you please show me any experience/incidents which indicates that you are aware with the process of name change not just the policy. Also could you please link me local page that handle name changes on trwiki as I am unable to find one. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 05:55, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @1997kB:. After Single User Login finalisation, renaming authorization has been withdrawn from local bureaucrat in trwiki. You can see explanation page there but in Turkish. So, I can not show you my expericence about renaming, I could not rename. Actually no one can (maybe a steward who I said above or bureaucrats who were active before SUL finalisation). Only global renamers and stewards can rename users. For example an active trwiki user changed username here also some of them are (1, 2) pending. However I can show you as an evidence of my knowledge about usernames. It is trwiki local user block request page. I requested lots of block for inappropriate user name (in Turkish: Uygunsuz KA or KA politikasına aykırılık). For example 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 etc, I can increase the numbers of my requests. I hope I could explain myself clearly... Thanks.Chansey (talk) 07:10, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response, Chansey. I'm Neutral too as I see no involvement in areas where you having the right will help your work. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 12:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @1997kB:. After Single User Login finalisation, renaming authorization has been withdrawn from local bureaucrat in trwiki. You can see explanation page there but in Turkish. So, I can not show you my expericence about renaming, I could not rename. Actually no one can (maybe a steward who I said above or bureaucrats who were active before SUL finalisation). Only global renamers and stewards can rename users. For example an active trwiki user changed username here also some of them are (1, 2) pending. However I can show you as an evidence of my knowledge about usernames. It is trwiki local user block request page. I requested lots of block for inappropriate user name (in Turkish: Uygunsuz KA or KA politikasına aykırılık). For example 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 etc, I can increase the numbers of my requests. I hope I could explain myself clearly... Thanks.Chansey (talk) 07:10, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Neutral Not an admin anywhere (how he gonna process the block-rename-unblock request then?), no crosswiki experience. The only pro is language skill, really hard to decide.--AldnonymousBicara? 10:10, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment @Aldnonymous:. As I said above i am not a sysop. However we are keeping in touch with all sysops (also CUs) via block request page and Telegram group. In fact, in trwiki we hardly ever handle block-rename-unblock processes. If i encounter any circumstamce like you mentioned, i would say a sysop to assist me. Regards. Chansey 10:49, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- I understand, but prefer to play it safe be really careful, the problem is, you don't have experience of doing any kind of election before this to show that you are truly trusted by the local community, especially the tr.wp community that you represent. There's also doubt I have because you never have the experience being a rename clerk. I won't oppose though, but at the same time I will not support. Thanks.--AldnonymousBicara? 11:40, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment @Aldnonymous:. As I said above i am not a sysop. However we are keeping in touch with all sysops (also CUs) via block request page and Telegram group. In fact, in trwiki we hardly ever handle block-rename-unblock processes. If i encounter any circumstamce like you mentioned, i would say a sysop to assist me. Regards. Chansey 10:49, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose while I would love to have an additional Turkish-speaker on the team, I would prefer it be someone with
+sysop
in that community as that is a demonstration of trust by the community where the permission would be used. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Global rename for Phjtieudoc
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Phjtieudoc (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 2 April 2020 04:17 UTC
Hello. I'm Phjtieudoc from the Vietnamese Wikipedia. I have joined Wikipedia since March 16th, 2017 and currently have more than 10000 edits on Vietnamese Wikipedia. I can speak Vietnamese and English. Currently I'm a Patroller on Wikipedia, which fight vandalism and tagging speedy deletion on articles, and helping the newcomers. For months, our "user renaming request" page have tons of requests on renaming. Thus we do have a global renamer who speaks Vietnamese but he usually don't active for personal reasons, and most of the global renamer couldn't speak Vietnamese, so it is hard for them to know the name changing reasons provided by users. I came here from 1997kB's recommendation and I'd like to volunteer to be the second renamer for the Vietnamese Wikipedia to complete those undone renaming request and respond them more quickly. I am often active on our home Wikipedia and want to make Wikipedia a better place for the users. I have read the terms & policies on meta and want to be another hand to reduce the works of global renamers, free them more times for editing. Thank you for your attention to this request, have a nice day and best regards! Phjtieudoc (talk) 04:17, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Well.. not a perfect candidate, but I am satisfied with their work on local venue-which receives good amount of requests and there's only one native renamer to handle them.
- To the candidate, if this pass please proceed carefully and whenever have doubts, consult before act. Good luck! ‐‐1997kB (talk) 06:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose same as above. If the claim is that you’ll be using it to support one language group that’s great, but I would prefer to see
+sysop
on that project to show the trust of the local community. No familiarity with renames or naming policy on more than one project makes lake of sysop there a no-go from me. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Requests for global IP block exemption
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global IP block exempt for Huerdada
- Global user: Huerdada (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Hello, I am a Wikipedia user in mainland China. For well-known reasons, I had to use a VPN to edit. Although I haven't edited many of them, I believe that every one of my editors is meaningful and contributes to Wikipedia. Hope to be able to pass, thank you very much!
In addition, this is the message generated during editing:
Your IP address is in a range that has been blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis.
The block was made by Jon Kolbert(meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given is Open Proxy: Colocation webhost - Contact stewards if you are affected Using ISP Rangefinder.
- Start of block: 2019年8月3日 (六) 02:52
- Expiry of block: 2020年11月3日 (二) 02:52
Your current IP address is 89.31.126.80 and the blocked range is 89.31.124.0/22. Please include all above details in any queries you make.
If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wikior send an email to the stewards OTRS queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details.
--Huerdada (talk) 06:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- As you only contribute to Chinese Wikipedia, you'd better to apply for a local IP exemption. Ruslik (talk) 20:55, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- For the record, emailing unblock-zhlists.wikimedia.org is the right way to apply for that. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:13, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for Heyanyu2019
- Global user: Heyanyu2019 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I live in mainland China and must use an VPN to view Wikipedia. For the moment there are no other choices for us. It would be so kind of you to give me an exemption. I really need this to edit something. Thank you so much for your support in advanced.
Below is the statement why I am blocked:
Your IP address is in a range that has been blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis. The block was made by Jon Kolbert (meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given is Open Proxy: Colocation webhost - Request an exemption if you are affected. Start of block: 04:57, 28 February 2020 Expiry of block: 04:57, 28 February 2021 Your current IP address is 109.166.36.5 and the blocked range is 109.166.36.0/24. Please include all above details in any queries you make. If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki or send an email to the stewards OTRS queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Heyanyu2019 (talk) 03:52, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Heyanyu2019: It seems you intend to edit Chinese Wikipedia. In that case, could you please email unblock-zhlists.wikimedia.org and ask for a local exemption? --Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:03, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Martin Urbanec: Hi Martin, i am an employee in a museum in China. I've already finished the chinese page and I am asked to create an english page for the museum. That's why i need this exemption. I will also email to the above address for a local exemption. Thanks for your help.--Heyanyu2019 (talk) 03:45, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for 晴望
- Global user: 晴望 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I live in China, where wikipedia is blocked. So I have to use vpn software to visit it. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by 晴望 (talk)
- @晴望: It seems you would like to edit zh.wikipedia. In that case, could you please email unblock-zhlists.wikimedia.org? --Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:08, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for JJonahJackalope
- Global user: JJonahJackalope (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Hi, I live in Georgia, United States. Recently received notice that my IP is within a range that has been blocked with the reasoning being "Long-term abuse". From the notification, "Start of block: 23:10, 19 March 2020, Expiry of block: 23:10, 2 April 2020". Block was made by Martin Urbaneck. thanks, --JJonahJackalope (talk) 00:07, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- @JJonahJackalope: I've amended the block, so it should no longer affect you. Could you try again, please? --Martin Urbanec (talk) 13:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
Requests for other global permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
Global abuse filter helper for CptViraj
- Global user: CptViraj (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Hii, I'm active in dealing with spambots, I report them to SRG frequently. I use Special:AbuseLog to track them. There are some private spambot abuse filters on some wikis and some are global. With GAFH I will be able to see details of private abuselog. This is will definitely assist me in tracking spambots and reporting them to stews. Thankyou. -- CptViraj (📧) 08:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Even without this right you can still use Special:AbuseLog to track vandalism. Do you have any experience working with abuse filters? --DannyS712 (talk) 20:30, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Sometimes abuse filters track non-spambots, so with detailed log entry I can make sure that I'm reporting the correct account. I don't have any experience in managing abuse filters but GAFH doesn't have any right to modify filters, it just gives right to view private filters and private log entries. -- CptViraj (📧) 03:14, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- If the abuse filter didn't stop the edit, you can see the diff. So is this to track and report vandals that were not able to successfully save edits? --DannyS712 (talk) 03:15, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Yes. -- CptViraj (📧) 03:20, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- If the abuse filter didn't stop the edit, you can see the diff. So is this to track and report vandals that were not able to successfully save edits? --DannyS712 (talk) 03:15, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Sometimes abuse filters track non-spambots, so with detailed log entry I can make sure that I'm reporting the correct account. I don't have any experience in managing abuse filters but GAFH doesn't have any right to modify filters, it just gives right to view private filters and private log entries. -- CptViraj (📧) 03:14, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Doing good work and have valid need. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 05:45, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support its just GAF helper, only can be used to "see" and not edit, should be fine for this user.--AldnonymousBicara? 10:40, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Seems valid. Just take extra care of account security as some global filters are very sensitive in nature. --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:44, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support. Trusted user with a valid reason. They are not going to break anything. —Sgd. Hasley 12:03, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support. per Hasley. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:34, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Minorax (talk) 14:10, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- FitIndia Talk Commons 14:49, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support -FASTILY 01:34, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support looks like it would be put to good use --DannyS712 (talk) 06:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support -J. Ansari Talk 12:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose not needed for the stated reasons. I’m uncomfortable giving access to global view rights for private filters on major projects solely for the purpose of tracking down spambots, which are easily identifiable on behaviour alone. Private logs on large wikis contain some sensitive data, and I really don’t see the need for you to have access to those. Sorry, nothing against you personally, but a basic principle of IT control is to limit access to people who have a need and I really don’t see this as a need. If we were talking about working with severely abusive LTAs, sure, but I don’t see this as particularly important to give for garden variety spambots. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
See also
- User groups — Information on user groups
- Global rights log — Log of global permissions changes
- Archives
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation