Steward requests/Global permissions

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Krd (talk | contribs) at 13:24, 25 June 2022 (requesting removal of global VRT permissions agents flag for Redlinux). It may differ significantly from the current version.
Shortcut:
SRGP
This page hosts requests for global permissions. To make a request, read the relevant policy (global rollback , global sysop , global rename , …) and make a request below. Explain why membership is needed for that group, and detail prior experience or qualifications.

This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.

Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).

Quick navigation:
Dynamic pages:

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests for global rollback permissions

Shortcut:
SRGR
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global rollback policy.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that: You have sufficient activity to meet the requirements to be allocated the global rollback flag

To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable.
=== Global rollback for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
::''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+5 days}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than 5 days (with rare exceptions , no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Global rollback for Cyberpower678

Status:    In progress
Not ending before 21 June 2022 18:51 UTC

Hello. Many know me for developing and operating InternetArchiveBot, which is a global bot. Unfortunately, a brain fart accidentally caused me to let the bot make a mass amount of bad edits on a wiki it runs on. It would be great if I could have global rollback, to speedily reverse these bad edits on any wiki. Right now I'm undoing the bad edits one by one, which is a bit tedious and time consuming.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 18:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cyberpower678, could you describe what exactly has to be done and what is the scale of it, please? I fail to quickly understand what went wrong from your global contributions. --Base (talk) 20:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Today's accident was caught quickly enough and only 49 edits needed to be undone. But it brings up a more important issue. This bot runs on more than 100 wikis at current, and like all bots, there may be a time where it just starts making a massive amount of bad edits. This could happen on any wiki. Manually undoing those 49 edits was already very tedious, and took a good ten minutes with help, when simply clicking a single button could have done the same thing in seconds. There could be an issue where the bot breaks, because some breaking change on MediaWiki was introduced causing the bot to malfunction on all wikis. Some of the smaller wikis might not even be equipped to rollback the damage, or may not even notice quick enough to stop the bot. My request is strictly a cautionary measure should something like that arise, I can take responsibility for the bot's actions, and reverse them quickly. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 20:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Cyberpower678, any chance to build a feature that will allow bot to essentially roll itself back on its own on command? As well as ideally also measures to detect potential out of ordinary edits automatically. --Base (talk) 21:10, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, yes, but how the bot knows if it’s edit is out of the ordinary is effectively difficult to detect in the first place. Page blanking is one thing, but repeatedly posting a URL it shouldn’t be posting will get easily missed for instance. And in those cases, the bot will likely be blocked from editing meaning I can’t initiate a self-revert script from its own account.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 22:16, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Cyberpower678, You can always ask any global rollbacker for few wikis(I would love to help in reverting bad edits of your bot or however), but if the problem is frequent then you need to have some function in your bot itself. I am not sure having a global rollback is the solution to your problem? QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 13:49, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Cyberpower678, Additionally what if there has been other edits to the page after your bot? QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 13:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's, fortunately, not a frequent occurrence. I haven't needed it until now. But I will happily take you up on your offer. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 15:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What is the extent of bad edits? How many projects and how many edits? And since when the bot might have wrong? We can set the dates on contribution and revert all the recent current edits. As if the edits are bad they had to be reversed anyways. It's a good thing that you came ahead. QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 15:51, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • GR is for handling vandalism, nonsense, or counterproductive edits. Using it to clean malfunctioning bots or any other kind of activity is just out of the scope of the GR policy. I would suggest using some kind of undo tool or Twinkle global that reverts mass-edits and would be much better for the use case. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 15:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Twinkle exists globally and can do mass rollback without the actual rollback bit? —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 15:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I've tried Twinkle Global, but despite disabling the option that requests for an revert reason, it stills forces a dialog box on me for every edit I am reverting. It's just as tedious as manually undoing each edit. Other mass rollback tools that I just got pointed to on IRC, require the rollback permission. So unfortunately I'm back to square one here. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 15:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Historically, if there's need for a userright that is met by a given permission and not others, it's okay to bend the specific policy a bit provided there's consensus. I think that Cyberpower being able to clean up issues that their bot may cause would be a net positive, and fall into supporting this request. Given his experience on the English Wikipedia and with running a bot of this size and global importance, the chances of abuse are next to none. Yes Cyberpower could make a request on SN or elsewhere for help, but it'd be a better use of our time for him to have the ability to do it himself. Cyberpower, thank you for volunteering, and happy editing! Vermont 🐿️ (talk) 16:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Trusted user. The reason why he requested the GR rights is reasonable to me. --Victor Trevor (talk) 20:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question Question: No issue with supporting them, pleasant to work with w.r.t. IAB Bot, so Support Support first. This seems a reasonable use of IAR to grant something that will help to solve issues relating to content on many wikis. I am just concerned about the duration, I personally will be comfortable for just a brief temporary grant to clear up the mess. In addition, should it be granted to the bot account as that is where the mess started? Thanks. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 06:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Since the scope of global rollback is antivandalism, I Oppose Oppose indefinite permission and Support Support a temporary grant for, say, a month. As Cyberpower said, [i]t's, fortunately, not a frequent occurrence, so one month (or two) should be sufficient for you. If the need ever arises again, simply re-request for renewal. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 07:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Perhaps granting GR with limited scope (similar to limited adminship) -> global rollback may only be used to rollback IABot-Edits? Johannnes89 (talk) 07:22, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I would oppose granting indefinitely even with limited scope. Since this request have a specific purpose, I would expect Cyberpower to not use his GR, if granted, for any purposes other than that one. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 07:33, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Your stance makes little sense to me. The mess is already cleaned up as it was small enough to do with a bit a manual labor. So giving it to me for 2 months serves nothing, unless I manage to create another mess in that time. That's not exactly something I am trying to do. I would also rather not sit here for 5 days waiting for a permission to clean up a mess, when I could already be cleaning it up, if I already have the permission. Not exactly trying to change your vote here, but just wanted to say. I'm well aware that I am asking for a permission whose reasoning for it isn't exactly in scope for the permission. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 11:55, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    If the original problem was small enough and has already been solved, and new ones have yet to arise, why would you need global rollback for now? I did want to support a temporary permission, but since it seems that GR is no longer needed I'm Oppose Oppose-ing. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 15:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    To cover future instances, should it ever happen again. Your rationale is that I ask for it when I need it, but that's a 5 day process, in which, during that time, other people could make edits, on the affected pages, making a rollback impossible. The idea is, if I screw up, which I don't plan to, it would make sense to swiftly be able to reverse it as quickly as possible. Asking for the permission when I need only adds a 5 day wait and just makes cleanup more difficult for everyone involved. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 15:05, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    This is a request for GR so that Cyberpower has the buttons to manage issues with the bot in the future without asking other people for it. He's not requesting a single use. Vermont 🐿️ (talk) 17:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose This isn't what GR is for. If your bot contains *that* many bugs, then you need to be more thorough with your testing and implement dry runs so you can be certain errors are not being introduced. -FASTILY 08:33, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Fastily:, It's been a while since we last interacted, and I carry great respect for you, but the comment is a little too black and white. This isn't about poor testing, or not doing dry runs. I was doing testing and dry runs, but accidentally did a wet run when I didn't want to. Accidents happen. So it doesn't require *that* many bugs to create a problem, it only takes one. Also with as many wikis as IABot edits, it's impossible to catch every problem during testing. I make every effort to catch every problem before releasing updates and bug fixes, but sometimes the bot will behave unexpectedly on one wiki entirely, while working flawlessly on the rest. Sometimes issues are unforeseen despite testing. Fortunately, I have never created a problem that needed me to invoke mass rollback, but it certainly would have been useful yesterday, and I'm just saying that having it as pre-caution would be nice to have. I get that this is out of scope, but I fail to see what the harm would be here. I'm not trying to change your vote here, since I do understand GR is only for anti-vandalism under current policy. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 12:05, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • As well as NDKDD, I would have supported temporary grant of GR right if some bad edits happen (they better not be, but in case of such massive scope of bot, they may well occur and thats normal if such problems are addressed properly), however I Oppose Oppose in this particular situation of unknown usage.--reNVoy (user talk) 11:49, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Renvoy: Can you please clarify what you mean by unknown usage? —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 12:06, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    well, your rationale for granting rights is a little bit vague and thats why exact usage is a bit unknown. reNVoy (user talk) 14:04, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Renvoy: My exact usage and intent is to strictly use GR to revert bad edits made by IABot. IABot runs on more than 100 wikis. I don't intend to use GR for any reason/scope beyond that. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 17:47, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support indefinite grant for reverting InternetArchiveBot edits only Indefinite because there is no use having this temporary as pointed out above. If Cyberpower wishes to use global rollback for other things in the future, then he should come back here for another request. I trust Cyberpower not to use the right inappropriately and only for the task he said he'd use it for. --Ferien (talk) 12:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, I am only requesting GR strictly to reverse IABot edits. I have no intention to use GR for anything else. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 15:15, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral Granting the global rollback also gives other flags, in addition to that of the rollback, such as autopatrolled and abusefilter-log-detail or suppressredirects in each project. Some may not be used, if you have limited use, but others will definitely be used (like autopatrolled everywhere). So it's impossible to give a GR for limited use only imho. Personally, I could look favorably on only a temporary flag (which should be extended by two months at a time for example), and specifying that this isn't the main purpose of the flag and it would still be an exception. Best --Superpes15 (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral per Superpes15's comment. ≈ MS Sakib  «TalK» 19:00, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wonder on why the Undo feature cannot be used - from what I have understood, it should work well in your case as you can feed the edits to be reverted to a suitable script. Is the problem because you'll hit the API limits? Leaderboard (talk) 21:10, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I have considered that, but it brings up other issues. On many wikis, I'm still hitting captchas which means automating a mass undo would fail, or sometimes some kind of new user edit filter would kick in, which blocks my attempt to undo the edit. I may hit other kinds of blacklists. Rollback is not affected by this as it just reverses the edit, plain and simple. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 17:50, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Would the API high request + captcha exempt rights help you in the way? Or do you foresee wikis blocking you because of, for instance, autopatrol/autoconfirmed? Leaderboard (talk) 08:51, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support, valid usage, trusted user. IIRC there's already a similar case for reverting malfunctioned bot's edits. Stang 11:50, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak support captcha-exempt ? No local rollback. —Eihel (talk) 17:24, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Trusted user. AlPaD (talk) 19:47, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Strong support Trusted user. Zppix (talk) 19:51, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak support for limited use case of reverting the bot. Enwiki admin so has experience with rollback (re concern about no local rollback above) --DannyS712 (talk) 00:09, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 09:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I find myself at the Support Supporting place after thorough consideration. The provided rationale is out of scope of the requested right and isn't something that GR is used for, however, it doesn't hurt to have the flag to quickly revert the messy edits, if the mess is created. Rest, I trust Cyberpower would not use the right for any other purpose and should come here if they want to use it for other tasks. --Baggaet (talk) 19:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral GR is contain not only rollback, also Cyberpower678 is trusted and experienced user —MdsShakil (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support - With the fact that, they can be trusted with the tool for sure. Rollback can be used to revert bad edits too. When there are edits which should be reverted, who else can actually do it right than the person(with AGF) who did it.QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 17:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose per MdsShakil and Fastily. Out of GR scope.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:48, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support I will support the granting of GR only on a limited scope. The user is also trusted --MeganB... …till the end 11:00, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global sysop permissions

Shortcut:
SRGS
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global sysops policy.
Stewards
When you give someone global sysop rights, please list them on Users with global sysop access and ask them to subscribe to the global sysops mailing list.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account ;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).
=== Global sysop for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential. Please note: Since 2019 all global sysops are required to have two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled.

Requests for global rename permissions

Shortcut:
SRGREN
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the global rename policy and the global renamers policy page.
Stewards
When you give someone global rename rights, please add them to the list of global renamers and ask them to subscribe to the global renamers' mailing list.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
  3. You have considered the addition of a user language box to your user page
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).
=== Global rename for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = meta.wikimedia <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). While all input is welcome, there is a hard 80% support requirement for this role as per the global renamer policy.

Global rename for 511KeV

Status:    In progress
Not ending before 6 July 2022 08:21 UTC

Hi everyone. Hope you all are doing well. I am here to request global rename permission to assist rename requests. I want to mostly focus on Ks Wiki, Ks Wikitionary and meta. I contribute to multiple projects including enwiki, kswiki, meta and others. I am also acting admin at ks wiki and a VRT member. I hope this tool can prove helpful. Rest assured, I won't misuse it. Thanks. 511KeV (talk) 08:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Global rename for QueerEcofeminist

Status:    In progress
Not ending before 7 July 2022 14:21 UTC
I have user account creator rights on mrwiki, testwiki and I have used those rights for various events and on enwiki as part of acc team. Additionally part of my anti spam and vandal work I have reported 320+ accounts for indef block only on enwiki under username policy violation. As well as numerous abusive usernames(a good number of out of my 400+ requests for gblock) for global lock too. I am also sysop on mrwikisource and mrwikibooks. So, I am aware of enwiki, commonswiki and global policy on username and rename. I know, What a is the abusive, problematic, and non-acceptable username for sure now. I would like to help with requests coming from Indic wikis. Having said all this, I know that I won't misuse the tool. thanks.QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 14:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global IP block exemption

Shortcut:
SRIPBE
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions. Please review Global IP block exemption. You may request Global IP block exemption via stewards(_AT_)wikimedia.org if you can not edit this page.
Please note: Global IP block exemption does NOT make one immune to locally-created blocks of any sort, only global blocks.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting global IP block exemption, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account ;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To request global IP block exemption
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why you need the access and why you're suitable. If needed, link to relevant discussions.
=== Global IP block exempt for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if there is demonstrated need for the permission, such as bypassing a global block from someone who is not the intended target.

Global IP block exempt for dxmaimxd

Status:    In progress

I am a Chinese user. Because the government has blocked the Wikiproject, I have to use the proxy server to participate in the Wikiproject. I get blocked when editing Wikidata and other Wikiprojects. --dxmaimxd (talk) 11:05, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Global IP block exempt for মো. আব্দুল্লাহ আল নোমান

Status:    In progress

I am a reliable user and contributer on bn wiki. recently,I get blocked in English Wikipedia. My IP address is not in good range. It's difficult to contribute thorough the IP. So, please consider my problem.I want to add that I am using Grameenphone from Bangladesh and my IP is unstable.thanks! --Noman☆ (talk) 07:46, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you was blocked in English Wikipedia it is probably a local IP block? Ruslik (talk) 20:51, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Ruslik0 yes.I can't solve the problem through the right. But I need the right for several reasons.Noman☆ (talk) 05:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
GIPBE does not exempt you from local IP block. If your IP is blocked on enwiki (locally), you have to solve it locally by getting local IPBE on enwiki.
Other than that, if you need GIPBE you will need to demonstrate your new needs (other than enwiki). — regards, Revi 06:29, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@-revi: I told enwiki as an example. I have to face many kinds of problem.My internet provider is Grameenphone.And as I contribute through phone ,my IP address have changed time to time. Sometimes, I can hardly edit a page. So, consider the problem again. thanks Noman☆ (talk) 07:18, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ruslik0 and -revi , I have got IPBE in enwiki. Actually I have worked in bnwiki,bnwikibooks , bnwikivoyage, Wikidata and some others and also determinated to make further contribution. Actually there is a problem in my IP. An administrator of enwiki have confirmed it. See the discussion here.so, it's time for reply!Noman☆(talk) 17:35, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Global IP block exempt for binguimath

Status:    In progress

Hi, I'm an English Wikipedia user living in China. Since I need a VPN to access the wikipedia, my account is blocked from editing the webpages. Can I request for a global IP block exempt? --binguimath (talk) 03:21, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Global IP block exempt for Polyhedron

Status:    In progress

I'm from China Mainland with >10 years of editing history, and I need VPN through variated IPs for reaching wiki and editing. --Polyhedron (talk) 09:53, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Testing this service may result in the loss of your access and is not recommended for inexperienced users.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting 2FA tester global permissions, make sure that:

  1. You are logged in on this wiki;
  2. You have read the help page about two-factor authentication and understand how it could lead to irrecoverable loss of access to your account ;
To request 2FA tester global permissions
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and INDICATE you have read the Help page.
If the request page is currently protected, please file as an edit request on the talk page.
=== 2FA Tester for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global <!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if there is no reason not to grant one. A steward will review the request.

Requests for other global permissions

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting additional global permissions, make sure that:

  1. You are logged in on this wiki;
  2. No specific section on this page exists for the permission you want to request;
To request additional global permissions
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain what kind of access you need and why. If needed, link to relevant discussions. If you hold, or have previously held, the right and are asking for either a renewal or revival of that right, please add a link to the previous discussion.
=== <Add requested permission here> for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = Username
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration. A steward will review the request.

remove global VRT permissions agents for Ahmad252

Status:    In progress

Thanks, --Krd 13:24, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

remove global VRT permissions agents for Alraunenstern

Status:    In progress

Thanks, --Krd 13:24, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

remove global VRT permissions agents for Redlinux

Status:    In progress

Thanks, --Krd 13:24, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Global_permissions&oldid=23449322"