Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Transition/2020/01

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

General discussion space

Title

Sorry for making this really boring request, but can we move this page to a more fitting title such as Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Implementation or something similar? Thanks, --Gnom (talk) 21:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

+1. Or alternatively, Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Transition. --Yair rand (talk) 03:06, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Not a boring request at all, Gnom and thanks Yair rand for your suggestion!.
We have gone back and forth in the internal discussions regarding the address of this page. Feedback that we have received is that the URL for the strategy page has been too long and for this reason a short redirect has been previously created and used (2030.wikimedia.org), which has been really helpful. However, for some time now we will continue to use the short redirect to lead to the Movement Strategy recommendations to keep them easily accessible for everyone. At the same time we would like to make the materials that we start publishing about the "transition" also easily accessible, so that is the reason why this really short URL was chosen.
I do understand that it might now be a too big of a shortcut and not ideally fitting, as you rightfully point out. Here are some considerations regarding moving the page:
  • As we are now moving into the Phase III of the Movement Strategy process with the implementation of the recommendations, I am unsure if the 2018-20 portal is the best home for this upcoming information. As we will be referring back to the recommendations in the implementation conversations, I believe it would be useful if the recommendations that the movement has been working on for 2 years has its own easily navigable portal. As a result I would like to (p)reserve Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20 as a home for recommendations we can always refer back to. As Strategic Direction and the process behind it has its own.
  • We could go with just 2020 for the transition process, which is one of the options we have considered, i.e. Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2020, but then again it would make sense to have a unified information page for the whole implementation, including the path how we got to the implementation, i.e. this current "transition". At the same time it is hard to set a timeframe on the implementation, so we might need to break the pattern of year numbers and go with /Transition or /Implementation options. What do you think?
  • In this light the idea was to use the "2030" number, as the process has become commonly known as Wikimedia 2030 process. Probably the address should have at least been Strategy/Wikimedia2030 or Strategy/Wikimedia_2030 to be more fitting. What do you think of this one? In a longer run there is a plan to create a central landing page for all the phases of the work on Movement Strategy, so this could be it for that one. Could it be a home for the implementation phase or should it be a separate one to follow the existing pattern regarding the Movement Strategy?
I would be interested to hear what do you think would be the best fitting address for this page taking also considerations I just presented into account. Would it be still what you have proposed or are there more fitting options? In any case, I would like current address to have a redirect to a new page, when we move it, for at least 2 weeks, because this link has been shared in different channels and I don't want to confuse people. Looking forward to your suggestions and thank you for your care and proactive suggestions! --KVaidla (WMF) (talk) 10:56, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, KVaidla (WMF). I totally see that "Strategy/2030" is way cooler than "Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Transition". But can we please make this consistent instead of creating more confusion by splitting everything up? This is one long interlinked strategy process, after all. Now we have several URL schemes, several landing pages, several sets of navigation boxes... Thanks, --Gnom (talk) 18:21, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Although I do believe that strategy needs to also be fun and cool to get the people engaged, the choice of the landing place was not really about that. I agree that consistency is a value and so we have replaced the page, keeping the redirect for at least some time. Thank you for sharing your concerns and ideas, Gnom and for your suggestion of a fitting home address for this page Yair rand.
We still need to work on creating a central page for the whole process where one can easily access all the phases and better understand the work and thinking. Hopefully we are there by the transition events so people are enabled to bring their best understanding to the conversations. Have a great end of the week! --KVaidla (WMF) (talk) 08:29, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Nominations spaces

The nomination space on this page says that it's for collaboratives without a default discussion space for nominations. Does this imply that all others do have such default spaces? If so, should there be links to them? (Also, is the section titled "South East Asia" supposed to actually be "South Asia"?) --Yair rand (talk) 04:27, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Dear Yair rand, thank you for pointing this out and asking the question! Yes, many collaboratives have these default spaces, but sometimes they are not public (e.g. Facebook groups, Telegram groups). These are really convenient places for conversations, but not so accessible and transparent as we are used to in the wikiworld. We will gather links here for the ones can be accessed and try to coordinate that the nominations and endorsements from other channels will be at least partially also presented here. It makes complete sense. --KVaidla (WMF) (talk) 19:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Nominations closed?

@KVaidla (WMF): I see that you've changed the content page to indicate that the nominations period is over. Should the nominations section of this page be closed? --Yair rand (talk) 22:57, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

It's also unclear what happens to the areas that didn't nominate anyone or if self-appointments are now accepted. I think Western Europe is already represented pretty well in this design team. Philip Kopetzky (talk) 21:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Dear @Yair rand:, thank you for your note on this topic. The nominations are indeed closed and we have been working this week to clarify all the aspects of the nominations. I will follow up with a closing note for each and every section. We have also published the selection criteria on the meta page and hope this is helpful.
Regarding the region of Western Europe, you are completely right, @Philip Kopetzky: - that is not one of the regions included among the regions we list in our guidance. This also means that we have foreseen attendance from this region through other group seats and also there is no current collaborative structure that could have been used for nomination procedure. I understand that there are perspectives that could have been added to the Design Group, but at the same time we need to ensure it will be able to do its work effectively, so we need to draw boundaries somewhere. I hope it makes sense. --KVaidla (WMF) (talk) 13:55, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Central nomination space

For the collaboratives that do not have a default discussion space to gather the nominations.

Important note: Please nominate (self nomination is also welcome) Wikimedians from your region here. In the case of multiple nominations endorsements received, engagement with the local and global wiki communities and onwiki contribution will be considered to select one representative.

ESEAP

  • Name of the Wikimedian (add name below)
Username/Name of the Wikimedian Home Wiki
Biyanto Rebin idwiki, jvwiki, wikidata
placeholder
placeholder

Endorsements

Biyanto Rebin

Nomination closed - selection made

There is only one nominated candidate and we have confirmed the interest. As a result, Biyanto Rebin will be the representative from ESEAP for the Design Group. --KVaidla (WMF) (talk) 14:08, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

WikiIndaba

  • Name of the Wikimedian (add name below)
Username/Name of the Wikimedian Home Wiki
Isla Haddow-Flood (Africa) enwiki
Sandister Tei enwiki
Erina Mukuta
Kayusyussuf enwiki

Endorsements

Tie-breaker vote between Sandister Tei & Kayode Yussuf

This section is created to break tie between Sandister Tei & Kayode Yussuf, after both users got 25 valid votes each.

Final poll results | Total votes cast: 20 | Total valid votes cast: 19 (Tunisia vote was after the deadline) | Votes for Sandister: 9 | Votes for Kayode: 10
Poll faciliated by:

  1. Thuvack (talk) 14:37, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  2. Yamen (talk) 14:44, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Affiliate Name Vote for Signature
Wikimédiens du Bénin User Group Sandister Tei Mahuton
Wikimedia Community User Group Botswana Kayode Yussuf Candy Khohliwe
Wikimedia Community User Group Côte d'Ivoire Sandister Tei Donatien Kanga
Wikimedians of Cameroon User Group Sandister Tei Georges Fodouop
Wikimedians of Democratic Republic of Congo User Group
Wikimedia Ghana User Group Sandister Tei Justice Okai-Allotey
Wikimedia Community User Group Guinea Conakry Kayode Yussuf Aboubacarkhoraa
Jenga Wikipedia ya Kiswahili
Wikimedians of Mali User Group Sandister Tei KAG1LP2MDIAKITE
Wikimedia User Group Nigeria Kayode Yussuf Olaniyan Olushola
Hausa Wikimedians User Group Kayode Yussuf Ammar
Igbo Wikimedians User Group Kayode Yussuf Uzoma Ozurumba
Yoruba Wikimedians User Group Kayode Yussuf User:T Cells
Open Foundation West Africa Sandister Tei Joy Agyepong
Wikimedia Community User Group Tchad Kayode Yussuf Abakar B & Abdallahbigboy
Wikimedia Community User Group Tanzania Kayode Yussuf Jadnapac
Wikimedians of Tamazight User Group
Wikimedia Community User Group Uganda Sandister Tei Erina Mukuta
Wikimedia South Africa Sandister Tei Bobbyshabangu (talk) 20:07, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Algeria Wikimedians User Group Kayode Yussuf bachounda leader of WikiDZ
Egypt Wikimedians User Group
Wikimedia MA User Group (Morocco) Kayode Yussuf Anass
Wikimedia Tunisia Kayode Yussuf Sami Mlouhi
Wiki in Africa Sandister Tei Anthere +1 Isla
Popular vote
Extended content
Isla Haddow-Flood
  • Support Support Isla Haddow-Flood user is a founding member of Wiki Loves Africa, a project known to have activated many Wikimedia communities in Africa, and has co-lead the project since 2014. She was actively involved in the planning of the first Wiki Indaba in Johannesburg. I have no iota of doubt in her competency, temperament, judgment, and effective representation of the African Wikimedia community at the Strategy Design Group. She has the relevant experience as she previously erved on the advocacy working group of the movement strategy. T CellsTalk 11:03, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Isla Haddow-Flood, is a respected member of the African community with many years of experience in project management within and without the movement. She's coordinated many successful cross-countries project in Africa, so, i see her as a very good reprsentative for AFrica.Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 09:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Isla Haddow-Flood, She has a great experience in the movement and a great vision in the extension of the movement in Africa through the multiple projects that she coordinates.--Geugeor Georges (talk) 10:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Isla Haddow-Flood She has done, and is still doing tremendous work to grow Wikimedia in Africa through Wiki In Africa and Wiki Loves Africa. She has also previously participated in Movement Strategy as a Working Group member. --Douglaseru (talk) 04:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Sandister Tei
  • Support Support I support Sandister Tei Ayisijoan (talk) 23:13, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Sandister Tei, I vote Sandister Tei. She’s just extraordinary EdemC (talk) 21:29, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Sandister Tei I support Sandister Tei. She is good for this work Dbaidoo (talk) 18:24, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Sandister Tei , I VOTE Sandister Tei. She is an amazing and passionate community leader. She has shown great commitment in pushing the Wikimedia Foundation initiatives across Ghana. Her dedication is unrivaled. As part of the core members of the Wikimedia Ghana User Group, Sandister Tei has proved herself to be a great leader through her selflessness, dedication and inspiration to the rest of the members. I will endorse her any day, any time. I VOTE Sandister Tei.

Jonas Afutu (talk) 18:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

  • Support Support Sandister Tei is a member of Wikimedia Ghana User Group, and a long standing member of the African community. She has demonstrated diligence in all volunteer capacities she has participated in, and has intimate knowledge and connection with the community. I believe she would faithfully represent the views of the community, which she is constantly in touch with. --Thuvack (talk) 20:41, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Sandister: Sandister has been a core team member and contributor since day one of the founding of the Wikimedia community here in Ghana, and has led many initiates within the local community, as well as represented us at wikimedia-related events in Africa and other parts of the world. Her experience and dedication to building the local community here and beyond is commendable and looking forward to her being a part of the Strategy Design Group. --Nkansahrexford (talk) 20:42, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Sandister Tei has been an amazing in everything she does to support the Wikimedia movement not only in Ghana but the rest of the world and I think she is the best to lead the strategy Design group Robert Jamal …talk to me💬 01:09, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Born a Wikimedian, truly dedicated and passionate about our movement. --Enock4seth (talk) 22:57, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Sandister Tei has been a very core team member of Wikimedia Ghana User Group she was very instrumental in making sure the user group in Ghana came into being in 2012 making it the first user group in West Africa. Over the years she has demonstrated a lot of committed to making sure that the Wikimedia movement grows especially in Ghana and beyond. She is a great team player and should she self on the team would do a great job.--Owula kpakpo (talk) 23:28, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Sandister Tei has been a pivotal figure since 2012 with helping secure the increase in awareness for Wikimedia/Wikipedia and the concept of wiki projects in Ghana and Africa. She has freely shared her knowledge with all and positively changed the wiki narrative in Ghana. I continue to benefit from her expertise and believe she will carry out her functions honorably in this position... User:Oralofori
  • Support Support Sandister is passionate about what she does and the founder of the Wikimedia Ghana User Group. I fully endorse her. DaSupremo (talk) 10:14, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Sandister has been a very committed team member of Wikimedia Ghana User Group since day one.She is the motivation behind the user group up until now and still counting.Having put in a lot of effort in making sure the user group in Ghana was set up in 2012 and making it the first user group in West Africa,I have no doubt in my mind that she is the right person to lead the movement. She has demonstrated a lot of commitment and hard work towards making sure the Wikimedia movement grows especially in Ghana and beyond. The high level of practicality in her experience puts her in the lead. She is a great team player and a trustworthy candidate.--User:Roysandytei 13:10, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Having known Sandister Tei for 2+ decades and the passion she brings to bear in everything she does, I cannot help but to endorse her. Sandister is an exceptional leader and an overall overachiever which makes her a valuable asset to every team. Taking into consideration all these, and the verve with which she helps fledgling editors in the Wikimedia Ghana User Group, she is a very worthy candidate. --SitsofeOfori (talk) 16:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Strong support Strong support I believe that Sandiooses will be a great pick for this. —M@sssly✉ 21:25, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support She was involved in Phase 1 of the Movement Strategy as an advisory member, to come up with the Strategic Direction. She also participated in Phase 2 to facilitate the Ghana Usergroup Strategy Salon, and is also interested in the implementation design. --Douglaseru (talk) 04:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Sandister's passion, dedication and leadership skills makes her the perfect candidate for the strategy design group role!Gameli H (talk) 15:01, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support A true and dedicated leader of the Wikipedia Movement . I endorse Sandister as the best candidate for the role . --Randybaah (talk)
  • Support Support Sandister's work introduced me to full scale Wikipedia editing and management. We need people of her caliber in roles such as this. I fully endorse her. forsonkwesi (talk) 06:14, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support I couldn't think of anybody for this than Sandister Tei, her selflessness, dedication building vibrant communities across Ghana and also leading Wikimedia Ghana User Group is very commendable. She's very proactive, knowledgeable and a great leader. Without a second thought, I endorse her. Noahalorwu (talk)
  • Support Support Sandister Tei has always been a strong voice championing the cause of Wikimedia in Ghana and Africa at large, she gives it her all day in day-in, day-out — and ever ready to go the extra mile. Her commitment and persistence is unwavering.-- Wenal14 (talk) 23:23, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Sandister Tei has been a performant and active member and organiser in the community over the years. I endorse her, fully aware of her capabilities. I know without doubt she'd be a great fit.
  • Support Support I vote for Sandister Tei. She's a great leader and is always ready to help; she takes her time explaining what is unclear and keeps checking on your progress to make sure you understand before moving on. She does not show partiality and that's what I truly love about her. Kate Abena Cobbinah (talk) 10:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

She is a member of Wikimedia Ghana User Group and a long-standing member of the African community. With her experience, i believe she'll represent the our best interest.

She takes her time to clarify issues, as well as, motives all to contribute to Wikipedia. I endorse her, fully. Usman Ibrahim Khalilulahi (talk) 10:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

  • Support Support I endorse Sandister Tei to be selected for this course. She is a great team leader who has done so well with the Wikimedia Ghana User Group and also for the Wikimedia African Community. Her attitude towards championing the campaign of the community can not be overlooked. The growth and achievements of the Wikimedia Ghana User Group are due to her handiwork. I hereby declare my vote for Sandister Tei. Abel Frimps Jr (talk) 12:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)


  • Support Support I vote for Sandister Tei. She is an excellent leader, passionate and committed to Wikimedia Ghana Group activities. She has a great deal of knowledge regarding Wikipedia and very receptive; which makes her a very interesting teacher to learn from. Mjosh51 (talk) 13:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support I vote for Sandister Tei. She is a respectable excellent leader, who has shown time and time again that she motivated and committed to Wikimedia Ghana Group activities and Wikimedia as a whole. She is very proactive and has displayed to near-perfection her unrivaled knowledge and leadership skills. iamknightrae (talk) 13:20, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support I endorse Sandister Tei, who has shown time and time again that she She is an awesome person with great leadership qualities show through her involvement and committement to Wikimedia Ghana Group activities. images 1 (talk) 15:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support SupportI endorse sandister Tei for her full commitment to Wikimedia Ghana Group. She has over the years been so dedicated to success of Wikipedia in Ghana. She deserve it.

Abdul Gaani (talk) 21:26, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

  • Sandister's passion, dedication and leadership skills makes her the perfect candidate for the strategy design group role!


Erina Mukuta
Kayode Yussuf

support: l endorse kayode Yussuf he is a diligent fellow, and has built capacity via experience through the years user:SimplyAlero (talk) SimplyAlero (talk) 12:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

  • support: l believe kayode Yussuf has a passion for the movement and will take it to greater heights. user:Nnebless (talk) 21 st June 2020
  • Support Support Kayode Yusuf is a long-time member of the African community and the communication manager for the Wikimedia Nigeria Foundation Inc. He has participated in at least 2 WikiIndaba and was actively involved in the last Indaba in Nigeria. He has the relevant experiences as he organized the Movement Strategy Salon in Nigeria in 2019. T CellsTalk 21:29, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support:I have known """Kayode Yussuf""" for about 3 years as a member of the WUGN. I came in personal contact with him when he hosted three Salons in Nigeria, and my local community, the University of Ibadan, Nigeria was part of the Salon. This impacted positively on our community as members were assured of our importance to the movement. Kayode has a passion for the movement and he is meticulous and forthcoming with information. I wholeheartedly support him. Adefanike (talk)
  • Support:I support "" "Kayode Yussuf" "" as the African representative. He has not only participated in WikiIndaba programmes but had always been an active participant. I therefore support his nomination.
  • Support 'Support' I endorse Kayode Yussuf's nomination as the african representative because he is very enthusiastic about information retrieval and dissemination. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ugwulebo


I support Kayode Yussuf, his works are remarkable and I believe he will be a good representative.

  • Support Support Kayode Yussuf his work organizing the strategy salons in Nigeria last year was remarkable Bilijin (talk) 13:07, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Kayode Yussuf has shown a high level of expertise in handling of major events in the past like the 2019 WikiIndaba where he meticulously organized the communications of the conference. He also successfully hosted a strategy salon in Nigeria. He has my support everyday. SuperSwift (talk) 15:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support: I fully support """Kayode Yusuf""" because of his commitment and hard work. I believe he will do his best for the movement.

Sowoletoyin I 100% endorse Kayode Yussuf Farmerslimzy (talk) 07:17, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

I endorse kayode yussuf Oluwayemisi81 (talk) 07:26, 22 June 2020 (UTC) UTC)

Support Communication is a key component of campaigns events/activities. Kayode Yussuf has the skills, strategies and experience to ensure that WikiIndaba is broadly communicated to all. I support him. User:AfricanLibrarianAfricanLibrarian (talk) 09:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC) I endorse Kayode Yussuf User:Olabisi11

  • Support SupportKayode Yussuf is a very humble and an active contributor to Wikimedia Foundation, aside this he is a team player and a great teacher. I witness his teaching ability during Wiki Indaba 2019. Oby Ezeilo (talk)11.56 am, 22 June 2020(UTC)
  • '"Support"' I endorse Kayode Yussuf's nomination bukky658 (talk)
  • Strong support Strong support I had worked with Kayode in the past and know he will do justice to the said position. Rajeeb (talk) 10:11, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  • '"Support"' I endorse Kayode Yussuf's nomination [[User:Omoijesh
  • '"Support"'I endorse Kayode Yussuf’s nomination. he has the relevant experiences for this task.( user:Omon ize-iyamu)
  • I endorse "Kayode Yusuf". He is a suitable representation for the job.

Oluwaseyi Josephs (talk) 11:22, 22 June 2020 (UTC)"Support"

  • I endorse Kayode Yusuf's nomination
  • I endorse Kayode Yussuf's nomination as African leader. I believe he has all ot takes to lead. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Na'angap (talk)
  • (User: kayusyussuf/Kayode Yussuf) Support: I endorse the nomination of Kayode Yussuf

"Support" I endorse Kayode Yusuf's nomination for being a founding member and a leader for Africa. He has the necessary experience. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sefoye (talk)

  • I endorse and support Kayode Fayemi's nomination because he is an astute and active person who puts in his best to achieve the best. He is apt for the job.
  • '"Support"' I endorse Kayode Yussuf's nomination Kid Keen 47 (talk) 12:55, 22 June 2020

Support I support Kayode YusufThe Terex (talk) 12:08, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

  • I endorse Kayode Yusuff's nomination. I believe he is equipped for the role. Christine Sarima, 22 June 2020 Christine Sarima (talk) 12:03, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  • I support Kayode Yusuf because he had integrity and will deliver on the job.

"Support" I endorse Kayode Yusuff's nomination as the African representative. He has the capability to excel.

Nomination closed - selection made

Wiki Indaba developed a process with popular vote and a tie-breaker with the affiliates and as a result of that process Kayode Yussuf emerged as the representative of the region. We confirm the selection that the group has made. --KVaidla (WMF) (talk) 14:13, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Wikimedians from South Asia

  • Name of the Wikimedian (add name below)
Username/Name of the Wikimedian Home Wiki
User: Netha Hussain (South Asia) ml/en wiki
User: Marajozkee (South Asia) bn wiki
Rupika (South Asia) pa wikisource/hi wiki/commons

Endorsements

Netha Hussain
Rupika
  • Strong support Strong support is one of the experienced Wikimedians who is actively involved in Wikimedia Projects with global and South Asian communities, including, coordinating Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore, Wiki Loves Women South Asia and Heritage GLAM project in India that focuses on partnerships with government institutions to integrate the notable works in Wikimedia projects. She has been serving in the Ombudsman Commission since 2019 and has good connections with South Asian communities. With her previous experience of the Movement Strategy 2018-20 process as collaborator and liaison, I have complete confidence in her abilities to support and represent the South Asian community in the Strategy Design Group.--Sumita Roy Dutta (talk) 06:30, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Rupika has the relevant experience as she previously served on the the movement strategy.Pmsarangi (talk) 07:54, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support She actively involved in many Wikimedia Projects and coordinating many outreach projects.-❙❚❚❙❙ JinOy ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 08:20, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Endorsed Clerk endorsed Rupika S, because she has been already worked in Movement strategy, and she is also collaborative indeed.

JogiAsad (talk) 08:49, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Rajeeb Dutta
  • Support Support I support Rajeeb, being an experienced member of the movement. His work cut across many continents so I believe in his judgement and his representation in any capacity in the movement. Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 15:21, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination closed - selection made

Regarding the endorsements there is a clear preference for one candidate to step into the role of being the representative of South Asia. We received a notification of concern regarding votestacking in this process, but having looked into the issue there is 1) insufficient evidence and 2) participation of less active accounts in the endorsement process does not make a difference in the end result in this case. As a result, we confirm Rupika as the representative for the region. --KVaidla (WMF) (talk) 22:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

North America

  • Name of the Wikimedian (add name below)
Username/Name of the Wikimedian Home Wiki
Liz English Wikipedia
Shanluan (nomination via email, June 9) AfroCROWD User Group
placeholder
Pharos English Wikipedia / Commons / Wikidata
placeholder

Endorsements

UTC)

  • Support Support Shanluan I support Shaunlaun’s nomination. Her involvement in launching our first Editathon (from the other side of the country) assured our success. As a result, we have continued our work with Wikipedia at Oregon State University and continue to rely on her expertise. She’s a strong advocate and leader. Bridges2Information (talk) 22:51, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Shanluan I support Shaunlaun’s nomination. She was vital in the success of our first Editathon and was extremely helpful in promotion for our second. With her expertise and support, we have continued our work with Wikipedia and have the skills to help others contribute as well. Osu.archivist.tem
  • Support Support Shanluan. She is dedicated to building community within the wiki world, and to helping that world be more inclusive. I was particularly impressed with her leadership in organizing the CheckIn as well as the Juneteenth edit-a-thon. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 23:48, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support Shanluan She would make a great representative. She has been a driving force for Afrocrowd for several years and more recently CariWiki, networking in and beyond North America and the Caribbean. Her networking and collaboration with Latin-American and African wikimedians also gives her a broader perspective that can only strenghten her strategy implementation design on behalf of North America. Her strengths include social media, cooperative leadership and institutional partnerships.--Aliceba (talk) 07:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination closed - selection made

There was a bit of confusion regarding the general nomination space for North America and so we needed to bring emerging parallel processes together, which took some time. Shanluan has confirmed interest in participation in the Design Group and has also been supported with endorsements and as a result she is selected to represent North America. --KVaidla (WMF) (talk) 20:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

WikiArabia

Please consult the nomination discussion on Arabic Wikipedia

Nomination closed - selection made

There is only one nominated candidate and we have confirmed the interest. As a result, Anass Sedrati will be the representative from WikiArabia for the Design Group. --KVaidla (WMF) (talk) 14:18, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Iberocoop Nominations

  • Name of the Wikimedian (add name below)
Username/Name of the Wikimedian Home Wiki
User: Chicocvenancio ptwiki /tech contributions
User:ProtoplasmaKid eswiki admin / Wikidata / Wikinews
User:Marcmiquel cawiki / Wikidata
placeholder

Votes

By consensus in Telegram channel, each affiliate (chapter, user group, thematic organization) will have one (1) vote. Only affiliates votes will count.
Affiliate Who
Chicocvenancio
WMPT DarwIn
WMB Joalpe
ProtoplasmaKid
Muj(lh)eres latinoamericanas en Wikimedia Jaluj
Wikimujeres Mboix
Wikimedia Mexico Wotancito
Wikimedia Chile Superzerocool
Wikimedistas de Ecuador Mikaelashamrock
Wikimedia España Millars
Wikimedia Venezuela Oscar .
Wikimedia Argentina Anna Torres (WMAR)
Wikimedia Colombia Tefita228 (WMCO)
Wikimedistas de Bolivia Caleidoscopic
MarcMiquel
WikiDonne Camelia.boban
abstention
Wikimedia CH Ilario
WikiDonne Camelia.boban
missing votes
Wikimedia Italia
Wikimedistas de Perú
Wikimedia Uruguay

Endorsements

Chicocvenancio
  • Support Support chicocvenancio Português: o Chico está muito bem familiarizado com a comunidade Iberocoop desde o seu aparecimento em 2010, assim como o restante Movimento Wikimedia a nível global; é confiável, e está bem familiarizado com o processo de Estratégia 2030, tendo sido escolhido e contratado como ligação da Estratégia com a comunidade lusófona em 2017, com óptimo desempenho; acresce que tem um excelente domínio da língua inglesa, fazendo dele um candidato à medida do cargo. Estou muito feliz que uma candidatura deste nível tenha aparecido, sobretudo considerando que o prazo termina já amanhã. English: Chico is very engaged with the Iberocoop community since its inception in 2010, and the global Wikimedia Movement, trustworthy and quite familiar with the Strategy process, being the Strategy liaison with the Portuguese-speaking community back in 2017. Adding a perfect domain of the English language to that, Chico is an excellent choice for this place. I'm very glad he candidated himself, especially in this very tight timeline (deadline ends tomorrow).--- Darwin Ahoy! 15:22, 20 June 2020 (UTC) This vote is the official position of Wikimedia Portugal.--- Darwin Ahoy! 22:26, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support chicocvenancio Português. Conhece bem a Wp-pt, familiarizado com o Meta, conhece bem vários membros do Iberocoop, conhece o idioma inglês, seria uma ótima aquisição.Jo Lorib (talk) 15:40, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support chicocvenancio Acredito que o Chico possui as qualidades necessárias para o bom desempenho da função. Fabiojrsouza (talk) 16:16, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support chicocvenancio Português. Chico tem minha total confiança para assumir as responsabilidades do cargo. Tem larga experiência em diversos projetos e um bom relacionamento com as comunidades envolvidas.EricaAzzellini (talk) 00:43, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Support chicocvenancio Português. O Chico detém todas as qualidades necessárias para atuar propositivamente nesse processo -- experiência, engajamento, capacidade crítica. Ademais, preocupa-me a falta de atuação da representação mais consolidada do Iberocoop para integrar a comunidade lusófona nos processos estratégicos. Eu mesmo solicitei diretamente informações e jamais obtive resposta. Entendo que essa exclusão e letargia precisa ser interrompida e o Chico é a representação necessária para garantir essa integração e estabelecer pontos de comunicação, independentemente de idioma, nacionalidade e afiliado. --Joalpe (talk) 13:53, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
ProtoplasmaKid
MarcMiquel
  • Support Support Italian. Propongo la candidatura di Marcmiquel, che ha partecipato super-attivamente nel Diversity Working Group e ha seguito fino alla fine il processo di strategia. L'unico di Iberocoop che ha concluso la scrittura delle raccomandazioni nella loro forma attuale/finale. Nessuno come lui conosce cosa è stato fatto e gli obiettivi che stiamo proseguendo; WikiDonne User Goup lo appoggia. English I propose the candidacy of Marcmiquel, who participated super-actively in the Diversity Working Group and followed the strategy process till the end. The only one from Iberocoop who has concluded writing the recommendations in their current/final form. Nobody like him knows what has been done and the goals we are pursuing; WikiDonne User Goup supports him. --Camelia (talk) 21:38, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Aggiornamento nelle note e nella tabella --Camelia (talk) 15:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Notes and comments

  • Quiero decir que todos los candidatos merecen nuestra confianza y nos parecen excelentes posibilidades. Queremos agradecer su ofrecimiento y predisposición. Dado que solo podemos votar por uno, nos hemos decantado por ProtoplasmaKid, sin que ello signifique que no apreciemos y valoremos al resto. Gracias. Millars (talk) 08:22, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Dejo por acá mi ofrecimiento a colaborar y ser apoyo con la persona seleccionada en esta parte del proceso, saludos --Oscar_. (talk) 14:35, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  • In seguito all'informazione che il nostro candidato MarMiquel sarà presente come rappresentante degli writers, come WikiDonne UG ci asteniamo dal voto; offriamo però la massima collaborazione con la persona che verrà scelta dagli altri affiliati all'interno di Iberocoop. --Camelia (talk) 15:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination closed - selection made

Iberocoop developed a process of affiliate vote to select their representative and as a result of that process User:ProtoplasmaKid emerged as the representative of the region. We confirm the selection that the group has made. --KVaidla (WMF) (talk) 14:36, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Central and East Europe (CEE)

  • Name of the Wikimedian (add name below)
Username/Name of the Wikimedian Home Wiki
Ymblanter English Wikipedia / Russian Wikivoyage
placeholder
placeholder

Endorsements

Nomination closed - selection made

There is only one nominated candidate and we have confirmed the interest. As a result, User:Ymblanter will be the representative from CEE for the Design Group. --KVaidla (WMF) (talk) 14:20, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Western Europe

  • Name of the Wikimedian (add name below)
Username/Name of the Wikimedian Home Wiki
Ad Huikeshoven (talk) Dutch Wikipedia
placeholder
placeholder

Endorsements

  • Support Support Ad Huikeshoven -- Having worked closely with Ad on a challenging project, he was able to lead our working group and help it move forward to complete its tasks. Very focused and organized, exactly as this process now needs. --- FULBERT (talk) 13:44, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination closed

@Ad Huikeshoven: - thank you for your interest to participate in the design of the transition phase. As we have anticipated presentation of Western Europe from other groups (EDs, chairpersons) and there is not really a functional collaborative across communities in this region, we have not allocated a seat in the design group for the region and this has also not been listed in the framing for call for participation. This point was also clarified during the office hours where you participated in. If you have any further questions, specifications or concerns regarding this, please let us know.

We also plan to open up the design process for people to follow, review and comment on the design updates and draft that we will share on meta. You are more than welcome to join us in this reviewer role to bring the insights and experiences that you have regarding the movement to help us improve the quality of the design. Thank you for your proactive approach and again for your continued interest in movement strategy! --KVaidla (WMF) (talk) 22:15, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

WikiFranca

WikiFranca developed a process to select their representative which happened in a closed group (accessible to all members of WikiFranca). As a result of that process Mohammed Bachounda emerged as the representative of the region. We confirm the selection that the group has made. --KVaidla (WMF) (talk) 14:42, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Transition/2020/01&oldid=20230158"