Jump to content

kulupu pi pona len

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This page is a translated version of the page Ombuds commission and the translation is 3% complete.
Outdated translations are marked like this.
Other languages:
nimi lili:
OC,
OMBCOM
 About the commission — Make a report — Email the commission — Discuss the commission
Activity reports: 2025 • 2024 • 2023 • Earlier
Published decisions
Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees committees

Staff committees

Community-wide committees

Movement governance committees

Resources allocation committees

All Wikimedia committees

Committee Support team (WMF)

tan wile pi kulupu lawa pi esun Wikimesija la lipu Wikimesija ale la kulupu pi pona len li alasa sona lon ike ken lon lawa pi len sona, lon lawa pi sona jan, lon lawa pi ilo CheckUser, lon lawa pi ilo Oversight. lawa CheckUser pi lipu ale en lawa Oversight pi lipu ale la ona li lukin lon pona lawa pi lipu kipisi.

As a global community body, they will not investigate compliance with a requirement imposed by local community policies additionally to the requirements of global policy. They can investigate whether the terms of local CheckUser or Oversight policies or guidelines comply with the global CheckUser and Oversight policies. Local policies are permitted to go further than global policy in protecting user privacy, but not to opt out of global policy in any way.

The Commission are not an appeal body for local or global administrative actions, such as blocks, locks, and bans. Where those have been based on checkuser or oversight information, the initial checkuser or oversight action can be investigated, but the subsequent block or other result should be referred to other global or local bodies.

pali

In addition to official investigation, they will mediate between the complainant and the respondent (usually a CheckUser , oversighter, bureaucrat , administrator , or arbitration committee member). When legally necessary, the ombuds will assist the General Counsel, the Executive Director or the board in handling the case.

When the case is litigious, the ombuds will be in charge of educating CheckUsers or others about the Foundation's privacy policy. When the Privacy Policy, Access to Nonpublic Information Policy, CheckUser Policy, or Oversight policy have been breached, the ombuds commission should report to the Executive Director or designated staff and recommend a course of action (such as removal of access to tools). Additionally, the commission might suggest suitable changes to policies or software.

Neutrality

An ombuds' investigation should be conducted in a manner determined by the ombuds to ensure fairness and impartiality. As a general guideline, it is best that ombuds avoid conflicts of interest as much as possible, particularly by avoiding routine use of CheckUser or oversight access and not processing complaints on the projects on which they are very active editors. However, matters that come before the commission are not clear-cut, and the language and culture of various projects may pose barriers to outsiders. As such, how the commission investigates complaints is left to the discretion of its appointed members.

Membership

Members of the ombuds commission are selected from the Wikimedia community by Wikimedia Foundation officials. A call for volunteers is issued each year in early October on the Wikimedia-L mailing list and on the talk page of this policy, as well as other project forums as appropriate. They are appointed (assuming they agree) for a period of approximately two years (one year, prior to the 2023–25 Commission). One or more non-voting alternate member(s) may also be appointed. A Steward-Observer may be appointed to serve alongside the Ombudspeople.

Current members


User Communities where active Language spoken IRC nick Term expires
Ameisenigel (CA) * dewiki, wikidatawiki de, en-4, nds-2, fr-1, tlh-1 Ameisenigel 2028
Arcticocean (CA) metawiki, enwiki en, sco-3, gd-1 2028
Chinmayee Mishra (CA) 2028
Faendalimas (CA) wikispecies en, pt-3, it-2, fr-1 faendalimas 2028
Jnanaranjan sahu (CA) orwiki gyan 2028
Mehman (CA) kawiki tr-N, en-3, ka-N, az-N, ru-N 2028
MrJaroslavik (CA) cswiki cs-N, en-3, sk-3 2028
Mykola7 (CA) ‡ ukwiki uk-N, en-2, de-1, pl-1, ru-4 2027
Nehaoua (CA) arwiki, frwiki ar-n, fr-4, en-2 2028
Revi C. (CA) kowiki, commonswiki, metawiki ko, en-3 revi 2027
RoySmith (CA) enwiki en roy649 2028
Teles (CA) † ptwiki pt, en-3, es-2 Teles 2027
Zafer (CA) trwiki tr, en-3, az-2, ru-1, kk-1 2027

† Advisory member; ‡ Steward-Observer; * Chair, terms expire in February of listed year

For previous members, see here.

See also automatically generated list. This list is generated from the global ombudsman user group. This grants commission members the following rights on all Wikimedia wikis:

List of global user rights (click to expand or collapse)

User rights currently assigned to the ombuds global group
Right Description Notes
1 abusefilter-log ilo pi weka kule la ona li ken lukin e pini Normally part of the autoconfirmed user group or granted to all users
2 abusefilter-view ona li ken lukin e ilo pi weka ike
3 abusefilter-access-protected-vars ona li ken lukin anu pali e ilo pi weka jaki kepeken sona len Governed by local policies where they exist, otherwise part of the sysop user group
4 abusefilter-log-detail ilo pi weka kule la ona li ken lukin e sona mute lon pini
5 checkuser-temporary-account sijelo pi nimi ala la ona li ken lukin e nanpa IP
6 ipinfo pali pi nimi ala la ona li ken sona lon nanpa IP
7 abusefilter-log-private ilo len pi weka ike la ona li ken lukin e pini Normally part of the sysop user group
8 abusefilter-view-private ona li ken lukin e ilo len pi weka ike
9 browsearchive o alasa lon lipu weka
10 checkuser-temporary-account-auto-reveal sijelo pi nimi ala la ona li ken lukin e nanpa IP ale
11 deletedhistory ona li ken lukin e pini lipu weka. taso ante ni la ni li pana ala e sona pi jo ona.
12 deletedtext ona li ken lukin e jo pi ante weka.
13 ipinfo-view-full pali pi nimi ala la ona li ken sona mute lon nanpa IP
14 abusefilter-hidden-log ilo pi weka ike la ona li ken lukin e pini len Part of the oversight user group
15 suppressionlog ona li ken lukin e pini len.
16 viewsuppressed ona li ken lukin e ante pi len wawa.
17 abusefilter-privatedetails ilo pi weka kule la ona li ken lukin e sona len lon pini Part of the checkuser user group
18 abusefilter-privatedetails-log ilo pi weka kule la ona li ken sona e lukin pi sona len lon pini
19 abusefilter-protected-vars-log ilo pi weka ike li lukin e sona len la, ona li ken lukin e pini
20 checkuser sijelo ale la ona li ken lukin e nanpa IP, e sona ante
21 checkuser-log lukin pi nanpa IP la ona li ken lukin e pini
22 checkuser-suggested-investigations sona pi nanpa IP la ona li ken lukin e alasa pi pona ken
23 checkuser-temporary-account-log sijelo pi nimi ala la ona li ken lukin e pini lukin pi nanpa IP
24 ipinfo-view-log sona pi nanpa IP la ona li ken lukin e pini lukin
25 checkuser-temporary-account-no-preference sijelo pi nimi ala la ona li ken lukin e nanpa IP, li wile ala toki e wile ni tawa ilo Part of the checkuser and oversight user groups

Submission

Complaints may be made to the ombuds commission through the following ways (preferably in a language spoken by one of the members):

Both ways will send message directly to OC mailing list.

Please follow these guidelines when submitting an inquiry to the commission:

  1. Be concise: Lengthy emails with unnecessary information make it harder for the commission to process the case in a timely manner.
  2. Be objective: Avoid making inquiries based on speculations or subjective judgements.
  3. Provide evidence: Please provide us with diff links and/or permanent links when possible.
  4. Be specific: Specify what part of which policy has been violated.
  5. Please inform us if your wiki has an Arbitration Committee (or a similar committee) and if you have reached them (or used other dispute resolution procedure customary to your community) before reaching the ombuds commission. Provide a link to the relevant case page if appropriate.

Processing/Reporting

Cases brought to our attention will be processed the following way:

  1. Confirmation of the request: We will send a notice of confirmation to the requester, and if necessary ask for further information.
  2. Scope: If the request is within the scope of the ombuds commission, we will do the investigation, if not we will decline the request and try to direct the complainant to a better place to get help for their individual problem.
  3. Investigation: We do whatever is necessary to find out whether or not there was a breach of the policies or a non-compliance or conflict of local policies with the global ones.
  4. Result: We give the result of our investigation to the requester, and if there was indeed a breach of the privacy policy, we will inform the user who was investigated and if necessary inform the Board of Trustees and if necessary recommend removing OS, CU or steward rights from the user breaking the policy.

Past decisions

Where the Commission has reached a decision which has significance for the wider community, it may publish it publicly. The decisions currently published are:

Reference numbers (in brackets) are given for the convenience of commissioners – they are the internal reference numbers of the case which led to the decision. Some published decisions will resolve several cases.

Activity reports

Activities:

See also

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ombuds_commission/tok&oldid=30677126"