Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Defender

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
I hereby withdraw this nomination. I will work to address the concerns presented, but will hardly want to run again in the near future. I wish to thank all the people who took their time to participate. Defender (talk) 16:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
ContentsYesNoNeutral


Yes

[edit]
  1. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Gereon K. (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --6AND5 (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. TeriEmbrey (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Support! TeriEmbrey (talk) 14:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   RadiX 15:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Let's give it a shot. Natuur12 (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   The edit count is a bit low, but with continuing involvement in content work, a lot of crosswiki edits, as well as their service as a global sysop I think they will be fine as a steward. Rschen7754 15:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Żyrafał (talk) 15:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   SWMT and global-sysop work are pluses and since the low edit count has been adequately explained, I'm not concerned. Miniapolis 17:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Sevimleribo (talk) 17:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I have seen them active on SWMT a bit and they seem level headed. Edit count is low and a little more experience would be good but they appear to be a good candidate. Reguyla (talk) 17:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Sure. Some concerns with experience, but overall can probably do a good job. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Flyingfischer (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Almondega (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Almondega (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Like what I see. OlEnglish (Talk) 19:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Mscuthbert (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   No problems with global sysop, give a shot for Steward. Mscuthbert (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Hypergio (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   НУРшЯGIO(beware of the moose) 20:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Wolmar (talk) 20:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Farin12 (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   Farin12 (talk) 22:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Laberinto16 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Laberinto16 (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Trusted user Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   White Master (es) 22:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   It's a week support as I would like to see more of your opinions, your comments on our policies and procedures. Sometimes, reverting and deleting can't show to broad community whether you know or not some important rules. However, has been doing a good maintenance work and it is great to have more Portuguese speakers here. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Eman235 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Eman235/talk 23:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   SQLQuery me! 00:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Per Rschen7754 — NickK (talk) 01:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. மதனாஹரன் (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Mathanaharan (talk) 01:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Obenritter (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Obenritter (talk) 01:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   HalanTul (talk) 02:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Legoktm (talk) 03:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Yash! 04:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. HCa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   HCa (talk) 07:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Ruthven (talk) 11:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Assianir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Assianir (talk) 11:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Babymissfortune (talk) 11:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Chiumbi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Seems OK. Chiumbi (talk) 11:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Jamesmcmahon0 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 11:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Deb (talk) 12:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Vinckie (talk) 12:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Ellery (talk) 13:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Gimmy dd (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Not fully convinced, but he has enough experience and will probably do well as a steward. Let's give him a try. Trijnsteltalk 13:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Kolega2357 (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Ochilov (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Ochilov (talk) 13:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Lsanabria (talk) 14:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Bff (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Bff (talk) 15:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. बिप्लब आनन्द (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   DCB (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Érico (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Boa sorte! Érico (talk) 21:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Ghiutun 22:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Erne Mogilevich (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Rschen stole my comment. Erne Mogilevich (ノート) 23:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone)   Risk Engineer (talk) 00:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Wildcursive (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Wildcursive (talk) 02:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   cyrfaw (talk) 12:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   No much convinced but assuming good faith. — T. 13:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Holmium (talk) 14:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Capella87 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Capella87 (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Rxy (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   rxy (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Marcelo Victor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Mvictor talk 18:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Richardkiwi (talk) 20:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   MelanieN (talk) 22:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Obelix (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Obelix (talk) 22:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Zeljko (talk) 23:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Waka Waka (talk) 00:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Vfrickey (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Impressive background, good English skills, responsive and plausible answer to question. loupgarous (talk) 03:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Morza (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Morza (sono qui) 08:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   –Ejs-80 09:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Pe-Jo (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   –Pe-Jo 10:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Alexanderps (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Global sysop and pt-N. Boa sorte! Alex Pereira falaê 13:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Jan Kovář BK (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2016   Jan KovářBK (talk) 18:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Leif Czerny (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Leif Czerny (talk) 20:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Cezar teodosiu (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Cezar teodosiu (talk) 22:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Ascánder (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Ascánder (talk) 02:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Rauletemunoz (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Rauletemunoz 03:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Syum90 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Syum90 (talk) 08:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   FASTILY 08:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016   He's quite experience Rberchie (talk) 11:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   good cross-wiki record - has contributed to many wikis and has global rights.--Snaevar (talk) 19:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by )2016   Xoegki (talk) 04:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Eager Lin (Message) 05:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. AMPERIO (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   AMPERIO (talk) 12:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Devwebtel (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   --Devwebtel (query) 14:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. DanielTom (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   DanielTom (talk) 15:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Hampcky (Verification pending)   --Hampcky (talk) 23:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ferran Mir (talk) 07:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Half past (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016   Half past (talk) 23:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Nassauer27 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Nassauer27 (talk) 10:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Antoine.01 (talk) 14:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Does not convince me, as of today. Inconstant activity, barely used local admin flags and strange excuses on the question page of this SE. Perhaps later. --Vogone (talk) 14:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Not yet --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Insufficient experience sadly --Herby talk thyme 14:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Not yet. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ulflarsen (talk) 15:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   O.Koslowski (talk) 16:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   SPQRobin (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Widr (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Asav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Asav (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Lacks experience.[reply]
  12. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   per Vogone Armbrust (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Mh7kJ (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Andrewredk (Not eligible, checked by Stryn)   Andrewredk (talk) 19:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   ChristophThomas (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Hubertl (talk) 23:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   MF-W 00:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   His activity level is very sporadic and only became a bit active in December.. Stemoc 00:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       WikiMichel (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   WikiMichel (talk) 00:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Checkingfax (talk) 02:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   David1010 (talk) 12:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Enirack (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Enirack (talk) 17:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   I wish to be more active in the future his/her. --Uğurkenttalk 19:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Ernstol (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Gorlingor (talk) 01:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Gulnar Rehimli (Not eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)   Gulnar Rehimli (talk) 10:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Veleius
  25. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Wikibenchris (talk) 11:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Carlotm (talk) 04:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016   Fuxx (talk) 18:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Coffee (Verification pending)   Coffee // have a cup // 16:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  
  2. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Alan (talk) 18:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Work2win (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Work2win (talk) 20:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Nrautava (talk) 00:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Needs to be a little more active eurodyne (talk) 02:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Has done xwiki abuse for years through COIBot to good effect. I have not seen enough work outside of that to vote for; nothing against candidate.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   CLCStudent (talk) 18:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   I'm not really convinced either vote. -Barras talk 13:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Krett12 (Eligible, checked by )2016   I don't see any reason to say *no* but I know nearly nothing about you so I cannot say yes unfortunately. Krett12 (talk) 03:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Omerlaziale (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Omerlaziale (talk) 06:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Nannadeem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Nannadeem (talk) 07:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Drzewianin (talk) 09:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016   Gag0409 (talk) 13:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   GZWDer (talk) 19:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Az1568 (talk) 02:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   — regards, Revi 07:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Magawla61 (talk) 13:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]