Steward requests/Global permissions
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).
Quick navigation:Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests for global rollback permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Requests for global sysop permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global sysop for Tulsi Bhagat
- Global user: Tulsi Bhagat (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 19 March 2020 09:32 UTC
- Transparency: Steward requests/Global permissions/2019-03#Global sysop for Tulsi Bhagat
Hello! Many thanks for putting your trust in me. To be honest, my activity is limited since I received GR. It's because of events and outreach i took part on (page is not up-to-date). Hopefully, I am active on various IRC channels and keep on monitoring xWiki for vandals, spam or LTAs. I've 0.65 xWikiness. I would like to request GS a bit to directly deal with spambots/xWikivandals/LTAs whenever they appears. I've read and understood the GS policy and information, and I assure you I will abide by it. Additionally, the timezone UTC+5:45 i am living in, will surely benefit. Also, I am experienced of using sysop toolkit being an admin here on Meta-Wiki, Wikimedia Commons, etc. I hope the community would give me chance to serve as a GS too.
PS, My name is Tulsi Bhagat, and I am not a cross-wiki abuse. Thank you for your consideration! Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support no concerns. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:37, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support, qualified, with good matrix/xwikiness across Wikimedia projects, and of course much needed language skill.--AldnonymousBicara? 09:38, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Reconfirming my opinion (!vote), I know there are some concern about Tulsi's past, but from what I see from his flags as commons-meta-wikipedia admins he never abuse it, especially SWMT related matters the GR, he use it correctly, this is the base of my trust, after that mistake he did in the past, he never do it again, and contribute high quality contribution like outreach matters and identifying spam in language we don't understand (especially in south asian language), if I can get help from Tulsi, why not?--AldnonymousBicara? 10:21, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Well qualified, active in crosswiki work. The issues from 1st application is more or less resolved. Thanks for volunteering.--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Несмир Кудилович (разговор) 10:49, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Minorax (talk) 10:53, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support -J. Ansari Talk 15:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support - Definitely. FitIndia Talk Commons 16:55, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support improved exponentially —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 16:56, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Sure! Proficient and trusted user, I'm happy to support. Thanks for your work. —Sgd. Hasley 20:23, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support. Sure. Hiàn (talk) 20:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Problematic history, previously globally locked, and an ever growing attempt to gain more rights. Nihlus 22:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Qualified and active across many wikis. I haven't have a pleasure to meet him before tho. Good luck! Nadzik (talk) 22:11, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Geonuch (talk) 02:55, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Nihlus' first point is old and no longer valid, I think he's moved on from being globally locked, and I do not downscore legitimate requests for rights. Other than the activity part, I think you're good to go. Leaderboard (talk) 06:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Doing good work and having them the right will be obviously helpful. On a side note, I don't think you need to mention that "I am not a crosswiki abuser" part anymore. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:11, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Weak support per 1997kB. -- CptViraj (📧) 12:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support can be trusted with the rights --DannyS712 (talk) 06:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm sorry but I cannot support this request due to the past issues especially as GS is very difficult to monitor across hundreds of wikis. I'm also put off by the numerous rights requests over the past several years and I generally don't accuse people of aiming for certain roles but I suspect that running for steward is next. The attitude (bordering on a tantrum) displayed at Meta:Requests for adminship/Tulsi Bhagat was also not what I would expect from an administrator. --Rschen7754 07:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Although I generally agree with good faith with "support", your previous history is far too large to give you such a high level of permission. You committed extreme abuse in 2017 (3 years ago) and then claimed that your account was hacked. In different discussions you made different statements. The community, (including myself) has already given you a lot of trust with global rollback. After the past incidents, I even find it wrong that you are a already local sysop in 4 projects. In a few years you may be given such permission, but not in the near future.--𐐎ℹ𝕜ⅈ𝕭𝒂𝕪ⅇ𝕣 👤💬 09:45, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support - per 1997kB. --Ashok Talk 11:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- I thought about this for a while and I was not sure during his meta RFA because of the concern mentioned above but he has been active and useful in that role so I think I will lean towards support this time. Support.--BRP ever 09:42, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose concerned about their attitude, asking people to stop "wasting time" and "to move on" while teaching that "those who look only to the past is seriously missing the best things to be happen in future". The past is the past, but the main protagonist of a controversial incident is not in the position to overlook the issue and even negatively judge those who still take it in consideration.--Sakretsu (炸裂) 13:56, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --*Youngjin (talk) 22:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support I'm giving support as he should be trusted at this time though there is something bad before. --Hamish 05:41, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Support--He is a good User. WikipedianSorjo (talk) 06:07, 16 March 2020 (UTC)- Striken out LTA vote.--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:11, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support 轻语者 (talk) 13:04, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Meets my criteria. Thank you for volunteering, Vermont (talk) 15:50, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Rschen7754. --Herby talk thyme 16:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Requests for global rename permissions
Steward requests/Global permissions/Global renamers
Global rename for Chansey
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: chansey (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 1 April 2020 19:09 UTC
Hello. I am Chansey from trwiki. First of all I am neither a sysop nor bureaucrat. I am a local patrol. I am a Turkish native speaker also I can speak English. I like to help users on my home wiki and I describe myself a vandalism fighter. I like to contribute for establishing a healthy project for good purpose and I believe Wikipedia can improve with mutual communication. I realized that no user is global renamer who is Turkish native speaker (only one native speaker steward on duty). I would like to be volunteer for helping users who request for renaming, especially Turkish speakers. I read policy several times and its soul is not so much different from our local policy. Yes, I know we are a developing wiki (but have too much potential), there is not so much request from us, however it will change. Trwiki is expanding. You might concern about my edit counter on meta but I believe I should edit my home wiki first for gain experience and I know the Wiki system, I am a good reader. So I want to serve as a volunteer to all Wikipedia users globally. I encourage myself. Thanks for your precious comments in advance. Regards. Chansey (talk) 19:09, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Question: @Chansey: Hey, Nice to see your willingness to offer help with username changes, but before I make my mind could you please show me any experience/incidents which indicates that you are aware with the process of name change not just the policy. Also could you please link me local page that handle name changes on trwiki as I am unable to find one. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 05:55, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @1997kB:. After Single User Login finalisation, renaming authorization has been withdrawn from local bureaucrat in trwiki. You can see explanation page there but in Turkish. So, I can not show you my expericence about renaming, I could not rename. Actually no one can (maybe a steward who I said above or bureaucrats who were active before SUL finalisation). Only global renamers and stewards can rename users. For example an active trwiki user changed username here also some of them are (1, 2) pending. However I can show you as an evidence of my knowledge about usernames. It is trwiki local user block request page. I requested lots of block for inappropriate user name (in Turkish: Uygunsuz KA or KA politikasına aykırılık). For example 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 etc, I can increase the numbers of my requests. I hope I could explain myself clearly... Thanks.Chansey (talk) 07:10, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Global rename for Phjtieudoc
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Phjtieudoc (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 2 April 2020 04:17 UTC
Hello. I'm Phjtieudoc from the Vietnamese Wikipedia. I have joined Wikipedia since March 16th, 2017 and currently have more than 10000 edits on Vietnamese Wikipedia. I can speak Vietnamese and English. Currently I'm a Patroller on Wikipedia, which fight vandalism and tagging speedy deletion on articles, and helping the newcomers. For months, our "user renaming request" page have tons of requests on renaming. Thus we do have a global renamer who speaks Vietnamese but he usually don't active for personal reasons, and most of the global renamer couldn't speak Vietnamese, so it is hard for them to know the name changing reasons provided by users. I came here from 1997kB's recommendation and I'd like to volunteer to be the second renamer for the Vietnamese Wikipedia to complete those undone renaming request and respond them more quickly. I am often active on our home Wikipedia and want to make Wikipedia a better place for the users. I have read the terms & policies on meta and want to be another hand to reduce the works of global renamers, free them more times for editing. Thank you for your attention to this request, have a nice day and best regards! Phjtieudoc (talk) 04:17, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Well.. not a perfect candidate, but I am satisfied with their work on local venue-which receives good amount of requests and there's only one native renamer to handle them.
- To the candidate, if this pass please proceed carefully and whenever have doubts, consult before act. Good luck! ‐‐1997kB (talk) 06:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Requests for global IP block exemption
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global IP block exempt for FerdiBf
- Global user: FerdiBf (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
My IP is blocked and the alledged reason is "Open Proxy". I am an author in the German wikipedia with more than 18k edits and more than 400 articles. I have no idea, why this block applies to me. I am not aware of anything that I could have done wrong. It happens from time to time that I am blocked for a short while which is very annoying. A global exemption would be very helpful, thanks --FerdiBf (talk) 19:12, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not that I have any issue with granting you the exemption, but maybe you use a VPN or similar tool? Would you be willing to share the error message to stewards@wikimedia.org, so we can check the block was really placed correctly, and that you are, for some reason, indeed connecting via an open proxy? --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:27, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Here is the German error message:
- Du bist aus dem folgenden Grund nicht berechtigt, die Seite zu bearbeiten:
- Deine IP-Adresse befindet sich in einem Bereich, der auf allen Wikis der Wikimedia Foundation gesperrt ist.
- Die Sperre wurde durchgeführt von Vituzzu (meta.wikimedia.org). Der angegebene Grund ist hosting service with open proxies such as 84.16.242.158 .
- Beginn der Sperre: 11:16, 21. Jan. 2018
- Ablauf der Sperre: 11:16, 21. Jan. 2023
- Deine aktuelle IP-Adresse ist 84.16.242.156 und der gesperrte Bereich ist 84.16.224.0/19. Bitte beziehe alle obigen Einzelheiten in all deinen Anfragen ein.
- Wenn du glaubst, dass du versehentlich gesperrt wurdest, findest du zusätzliche Informationen und Anweisungen in der globalen Richtlinie keine offenen Proxies. Andernfalls diskutiere die Sperre bitte durch eine Anfrage zur Überprüfung im Meta-Wiki oder sende eine E-Mai an die Steward-OTRS-Queue per stewards@wikimedia.org inklusive aller obigen Details.
- It basically says that I would use "open proxies", whatever this exactly may mean. I even don't know what I could change. This differs from an earlier message which proposed to ask for an exception and which had directed me to this page. That's the current status. Presently I cannot make any edits. Any hint what I could do would be highly appreciated.--FerdiBf (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- It worked fine for a few days but now the blocked status is back. Please help.--FerdiBf (talk) 18:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- There is a log of Vituzzu's rangeblock here. The WHOIS indicates this site is hosted at leaseweb.com, a web host. You are probably employing a VPN service (en:Avira) that is hosted at leaseweb. Somebody logging onto English Wikipedia through a web host would risk having their connection blocked under the en:WP:OP rules. Though I don't deal with VPNs very often, my guess is that the reputation of the VPN could make a difference. To avoid the block you can probably connect to Wikipedia directly, without using the VPN. Since Wikipedia access is encrypted, it protects you against some of the same issues as a VPN would. EdJohnston (talk) 00:07, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- It worked fine for a few days but now the blocked status is back. Please help.--FerdiBf (talk) 18:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for AsharaDayne
- Global user: AsharaDayne (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Hello, I come from China Mainland. I am an active editor of Chinese Wikipedia. For reasons known to all, I need a VPN to login in it currently. I need the permission for editing links on Wikidata. Thanks. --AsharaDayne (talk) 09:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- AsharaDayne, could you comment your English Wikipedia block, please? --Base (talk) 08:18, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Base, I had some edit wars with other editors because I didn't know the rules at that time. But the reason why they banned me was unacceptableby, the administrator of English Wikipedia thought I was another user's dummy account according to en:Wikipedia:The duck test. AsharaDayne (talk) 11:16, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- @AsharaDayne: The block should be appealled to Unblock Ticket Request System. You should explicitly state whether you are the alleged sock master in your unblock request. (You are not banned.)--GZWDer (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- @GZWDer:, Thanks, I will try it. AsharaDayne (talk) 07:48, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- @AsharaDayne: The block should be appealled to Unblock Ticket Request System. You should explicitly state whether you are the alleged sock master in your unblock request. (You are not banned.)--GZWDer (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- Base, I had some edit wars with other editors because I didn't know the rules at that time. But the reason why they banned me was unacceptableby, the administrator of English Wikipedia thought I was another user's dummy account according to en:Wikipedia:The duck test. AsharaDayne (talk) 11:16, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for Prianteltix
- Global user: Prianteltix (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
From time to time, I have the same problem that occurs at the User FerdiBF listed above me. I am also an author in the german Wikipedia and for some reason, there are sometimes some bans bans, that weren't for me but for some IP's instead, hinder me to edit pages. In my case, the latest error message was:
- Du bist aus dem folgenden Grund nicht berechtigt, die Seite zu bearbeiten:
- Deine IP-Adresse befindet sich in einem Bereich, der auf allen Wikis der Wikimedia Foundation gesperrt ist.
- Die Sperre wurde durchgeführt von Jon Kolbert (meta.wikimedia.org). Der angegebene Grund ist Open Proxy: Colocation webhost - Request an exemption if you are affected.
- Beginn der Sperre: 04:56, 28. Feb. 2020
- Ablauf der Sperre: 04:56, 28. Feb. 2021
- Deine aktuelle IP-Adresse ist 46.165.225.54 und der gesperrte Bereich ist 46.165.192.0/18. Bitte beziehe alle obigen Einzelheiten in all deinen Anfragen ein.
- Wenn du glaubst, dass du versehentlich gesperrt wurdest, findest du zusätzliche Informationen und Anweisungen in der globalen Richtlinie keine offenen Proxies. Andernfalls diskutiere die Sperre bitte durch eine Anfrage zur Überprüfung im Meta-Wiki oder sende eine E-Mai an die Steward-OTRS-Queue per stewards@wikimedia.org inklusive aller obigen Details.
Please help me, thanks in advance! Prianteltix (talk) 20:14, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Prianteltix: Do you use a VPN or similar service? If so, could you try to turn it off/exempt Wikipedia from it? --Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for Dark Eagle
- Global user: Dark Eagle (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I have an IP block exemption in Latvian Wikipedia. But sometimes I need to make edits in Commons and Wikidata. I have IP from my provider, so I have no possibility to change it, thanks, --Dark Eagle (talk) 20:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Are you affected by a global block? If the block is local, you would have to request local exemption - the global one works for global blocks only. If you are not sure, you can share your IP address - if you're not comfortable with sharing it here, you can email stewards@wikimedia.org. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Global block till 2020-08-30: Your current IP address is 86.63.183.183 and the blocked range is 86.63.160.0/19. --Dark Eagle (talk) 22:21, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for Huerdada
- Global user: Huerdada (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Hello, I am a Wikipedia user in mainland China. For well-known reasons, I had to use a VPN to edit. Although I haven't edited many of them, I believe that every one of my editors is meaningful and contributes to Wikipedia. Hope to be able to pass, thank you very much!
In addition, this is the message generated during editing:
Your IP address is in a range that has been blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis.
The block was made by Jon Kolbert(meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given is Open Proxy: Colocation webhost - Contact stewards if you are affected Using ISP Rangefinder.
- Start of block: 2019年8月3日 (六) 02:52
- Expiry of block: 2020年11月3日 (二) 02:52
Your current IP address is 89.31.126.80 and the blocked range is 89.31.124.0/22. Please include all above details in any queries you make.
If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wikior send an email to the stewards OTRS queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details.
--Huerdada (talk) 06:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- As you only contribute to Chinese Wikipedia, you'd better to apply for a local IP exemption. Ruslik (talk) 20:55, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for Heyanyu2019
- Global user: Heyanyu2019 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I live in mainland China and must use an VPN to view Wikipedia. For the moment there are no other choices for us. It would be so kind of you to give me an exemption. I really need this to edit something. Thank you so much for your support in advanced.
Below is the statement why I am blocked:
Your IP address is in a range that has been blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis. The block was made by Jon Kolbert (meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given is Open Proxy: Colocation webhost - Request an exemption if you are affected. Start of block: 04:57, 28 February 2020 Expiry of block: 04:57, 28 February 2021 Your current IP address is 109.166.36.5 and the blocked range is 109.166.36.0/24. Please include all above details in any queries you make. If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki or send an email to the stewards OTRS queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Heyanyu2019 (talk) 03:52, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Heyanyu2019: It seems you intend to edit Chinese Wikipedia. In that case, could you please email unblock-zhlists.wikimedia.org and ask for a local exemption? --Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:03, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for Thedarkknightli
- Global user: Thedarkknightli (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I'm active on English Wiktionary, but I can't edit it now. I live in Mainland China and it's impossible for me to edit Wiktionary, Wikipedia, etc. without a VPN/proxy server. I hope you grant my account this right. It'll help me much.
Thanks,
Thedarkknightli (talk) 06:34, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Granted Keep in mind for local blocks, you have to request local exemption as well. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:06, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for 晴望
- Global user: 晴望 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I live in China, where wikipedia is blocked. So I have to use vpn software to visit it. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by 晴望 (talk)
- @晴望: It seems you would like to edit zh.wikipedia. In that case, could you please email unblock-zhlists.wikimedia.org? --Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:08, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
2FA Tester for I'llbeyourbeach
- Global user: I'llbeyourbeach (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I've gone through H:2FA and would like to test 2fa on Wikipedia, thanks, --I'llbeyourbeach (talk) 06:34, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done --Martin Urbanec (talk) 08:54, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
2FA Tester for Themanozze
- Global user: Themanozze (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I have read through the 2FA documentation and would really like to use it, thanks, --Themanozze (talk) 13:17, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done Ruslik (talk) 20:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Requests for other global permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
API high limit requestors for DannyS712
- Global user: DannyS712 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Hi. I'd like to request global API high limit requestors rights. Since the documentation for this right is fairly brief, I'll explain what it does: it grants the user apihighlimits
, which allows querying for more data at once via the api. I do a lot of queries via the api, both in the course of my normal editing and when troubleshooting my bots, and this will simply make things easier for me. The sole way it can be abused that I see (not posting per BEANS) does not apply to me. It is already included in the global sysops and global bots groups (among others) and generally bundled with sysop and bot access. It does not grant any extra editing powers or on-wiki functionality, but rather makes api queries easier by increasing the maximum batch size. I'm happy to answer any questions. Since there is no established policy that I could find regarding access to this right, there is no "not ending before ___" included at the top of this request, but it is not urgent. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 19:29, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: What you need to run the API queries on? Can it be run on / via mediawiki where you are a sysop? If it's so sensitive per BEANS feel free to drop me an email. Regards,--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:18, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Eg querying lint errors or searching in ways that the GUI doesn't support. While I am a sysop on a few sites, as far as I know apihighlimits does not work cross-domain, so no, this cannot be done from those wikis to query others. (The BEANS think is a way to abuse the right, and it doesn't apply to me). Does this answer your question? --DannyS712 (talk) 10:20, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: Oh okay, sort of get it. You are not considering a bot account for those queries? --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- No, since I don't need the rights for editing, and it doesn't make sense to switch accounts, make the query, and then switch back to my account to use the results. --DannyS712 (talk) 10:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Then. I guess will be temp access?--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:23, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Um, this isn't a temporary use (I guess eventually I'll stop editing as much, but I don't plan on that being any time soon) - each query is only run a few times, but I was hoping for this to be permanent (I know, uncharted territory, no established policy, ... :( ) --DannyS712 (talk) 10:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: is the information you want to query about not available from a database dump? — xaosflux Talk 13:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- No, it isn't --DannyS712 (talk) 15:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: is the information you want to query about not available from a database dump? — xaosflux Talk 13:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Um, this isn't a temporary use (I guess eventually I'll stop editing as much, but I don't plan on that being any time soon) - each query is only run a few times, but I was hoping for this to be permanent (I know, uncharted territory, no established policy, ... :( ) --DannyS712 (talk) 10:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Then. I guess will be temp access?--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:23, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- No, since I don't need the rights for editing, and it doesn't make sense to switch accounts, make the query, and then switch back to my account to use the results. --DannyS712 (talk) 10:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: Oh okay, sort of get it. You are not considering a bot account for those queries? --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Eg querying lint errors or searching in ways that the GUI doesn't support. While I am a sysop on a few sites, as far as I know apihighlimits does not work cross-domain, so no, this cannot be done from those wikis to query others. (The BEANS think is a way to abuse the right, and it doesn't apply to me). Does this answer your question? --DannyS712 (talk) 10:20, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Discussed this with Danny via IRC, and his intention is to manually (with an assistance of a script) fix lint errors across multiple wikis. Having said that, I see the rationale for granting. If there won't be any opposes within few days, I'll close this as granted. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note to others (as I said to Martin Urbanec over IRC) this is just one use of the rights, not the only one --DannyS712 (talk) 20:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 16:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Global abuse filter helper for CptViraj
- Global user: CptViraj (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Hii, I'm active in dealing with spambots, I report them to SRG frequently. I use Special:AbuseLog to track them. There are some private spambot abuse filters on some wikis and some are global. With GAFH I will be able to see details of private abuselog. This is will definitely assist me in tracking spambots and reporting them to stews. Thankyou. -- CptViraj (📧) 08:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Even without this right you can still use Special:AbuseLog to track vandalism. Do you have any experience working with abuse filters? --DannyS712 (talk) 20:30, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Sometimes abuse filters track non-spambots, so with detailed log entry I can make sure that I'm reporting the correct account. I don't have any experience in managing abuse filters but GAFH doesn't have any right to modify filters, it just gives right to view private filters and private log entries. -- CptViraj (📧) 03:14, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- If the abuse filter didn't stop the edit, you can see the diff. So is this to track and report vandals that were not able to successfully save edits? --DannyS712 (talk) 03:15, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Yes. -- CptViraj (📧) 03:20, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- If the abuse filter didn't stop the edit, you can see the diff. So is this to track and report vandals that were not able to successfully save edits? --DannyS712 (talk) 03:15, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Sometimes abuse filters track non-spambots, so with detailed log entry I can make sure that I'm reporting the correct account. I don't have any experience in managing abuse filters but GAFH doesn't have any right to modify filters, it just gives right to view private filters and private log entries. -- CptViraj (📧) 03:14, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Doing good work and have valid need. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 05:45, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support its just GAF helper, only can be used to "see" and not edit, should be fine for this user.--AldnonymousBicara? 10:40, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Seems valid. Just take extra care of account security as some global filters are very sensitive in nature. --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:44, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support. Trusted user with a valid reason. They are not going to break anything. —Sgd. Hasley 12:03, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support. per Hasley. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:34, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Minorax (talk) 14:10, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- FitIndia Talk Commons 14:49, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
See also
- User groups — Information on user groups
- Global rights log — Log of global permissions changes
- Archives
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation