Steward requests/Checkuser: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
Line 324: Line 324:
=== Tsiusing106@zh.wikipedia ===
=== Tsiusing106@zh.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
{{CU request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|status = done<!--don't change this line-->
|language code = zh
|language code = zh
|project shortcut= w
|project shortcut= w
Line 334: Line 334:
}}
}}
:{{doing}} &mdash;&nbsp;regards, [[User:-revi|<span style="color:green;font-family:Courier new, serif;font-variant:small-caps">Revi</span>]] 11:27, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
:{{doing}} &mdash;&nbsp;regards, [[User:-revi|<span style="color:green;font-family:Courier new, serif;font-variant:small-caps">Revi</span>]] 11:27, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

{{User:-revi/quote|Completed:

* {{confirmed}}: Accounts in [[Steward requests/Checkuser/2018-05#Tsiusing106@zh.wikipedia]], TWICEAing, 21DSSN1, '''''Gee2113'''''

----
* '''Bold''': Users not in CU request.
* ''Italics'': Users not blocked on zhwiki as of 11:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC).
** '''''Bold and italics''''': both bold and italics.
}}

All the checks on meta are primarily based on technical data and {{Behaviour}}. &mdash;&nbsp;regards, [[User:-revi|<span style="color:green;font-family:Courier new, serif;font-variant:small-caps">Revi</span>]] 11:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


==See also == <!-- DO NOT EDIT UNDER THIS LINE -->
==See also == <!-- DO NOT EDIT UNDER THIS LINE -->

Revision as of 11:59, 17 June 2018

Shortcut:
SRCU
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}:  Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale
{{Declined}}:  Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}:  It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball

This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also requesting checkuser access). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.

Before making a request:

  1. Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.
  2. Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using diff links or other evidence.
  3. Make sure there are no local checkusers.
  4. Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:


How to make a request

How to make a request:

  • Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also {{srcu}} help).
    === Username@xx.project ===
    {{CU request
     |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
     |language code   = 
     |project shortcut= 
     |user name1      = 
     |user name2      = 
     |user name3      = 
    <!-- Max 10 users -->
     |discussion      = [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
     |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
    }}
    

    For example:

    === Example@en.wikipedia ===
    {{CU request
     |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
     |language code   = en
     |project shortcut= w
     |user name1      = Example
     |user name2      = Foo
     |user name3      = Bar
    <!-- Max 10 users -->
     |discussion      = [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
     |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
    }}
    
  • Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.
Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests

Μαυρο Μαργαριταρι@el.wikipedia

CheckUser requests are not votes or discussions. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:37, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ignore the above request. The last comment is obviouσly trolling. The other usernnames should probably checked.--MARKELLOSLeave me a message 16:03, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • update. In the meantime, users Μαυρο Μαργαριταρι, Tina ftore, Ερωφίλη, Ορενόκος, Mangaolo, and Crveno belli have been blocked indefinitely for abusive use of multiple accounts in the Greek-language WP. ——Chalk19 (talk) 22:38, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hatake@sq.wikipedia

CheckUser requests are not votes or discussions. — regards, Revi 09:00, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Instead of copying and reposting my archived request, you could've just continued the discussion there. Contrary to what 1l2l3k claims here, he most likely knows Zall-herr is a sock, as he explicitly asked him this on his talk page.1 Why would one ask X out of the blue if he was Y unless he actually suspects him of being Y?--Udha (talk) 12:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You're right Udha. I don't understand why they don't block Hatake and his sockpuppets forever from Wikipedia (not just for one week or one month). If there is anyone still doubting, just have a look at what's happening at SQwiki in the last days... More than 15 sockpuppets created by Hatake! With all that behavioral evidence as well, I just can't realize how this can be possible.--Cinephile-al (talk) 15:23, 8 May 2018 (CEST)
@Cinephile-al: user:Ruslik0 said it's confirmed if there is behavioral evidence1, and 1l2l3k sees the behavioral evidence too 1 otherwise he wouldn't have asked him if he's Hatake, so if he refuses to admit it and block Zall-Herr then just go to another administrator.--Udha (talk) 17:20, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, Zall-herr is currently blocked in sqwiki, and we are awaiting for the conclusions of this report to decide whether to perm block him, or not. --1l2l3k (talk) 17:28, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, you didn't block him. Another admin did. You had plenty of time to do so but you refused, as you claimed here that there was no behavioral evidence, but as I showed in my post above you were lying. You did indeed see behavioral evidence but you refused to act. I'm not the only who's surprised by this.--Udha (talk) 17:57, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The IP user:1l2l3k added to the checkuser request, started throwing a fit, vandalizing articles related to communism but also artists and historians whom user:Hatake views as being communist. For the record, Hatake is an ardent anti-communist. The IP started throwing insults. Then when he vandalized some of my articles like this one instead of giving a reason he insulted me "pis i paburre" (Hatake often calls me "unmanly"). Then he vandalized another article including words like "unmanly" and "wicked" in the reasoning (In Albanian wicked is "i paUDHË", a word play for my username Udha)2. When an anonymous IP reverted his vandalism, the troll IP reverted all the edits back giving something like "I reverted Udha" as a reason and throwing some additional insults at me. He then went on to vandalize my User Page and accuse another user of being my sock. Afterwards he created the account User:Barnabë Trohasi. Besides pretty much openly admitting that he's Hatake in his very first edit, insulting the "communists" on SQwiki, he reverted some of his vandalism back, but continued insulting me with his new account "pis i flliqt"--Udha (talk) 18:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That’s true. Admin 1|2|3k didn’t block Hatake sock Zall-herr, but admin Liridon did it yesterday and just for one week (waiting for checkuser response here). Instead of reporting other people here with no relevance at all, instead of supporting Zall-herr in every article, instead of blocking one of the best contributors in SQwiki for 3 months (!!! user:Udha); Administrator 1|2|3k should block Hatake, the Master of Puppets in SQwiki, responsible for all the mess. 09:43, 9 May 2018 (CEST)

There is no vandalism by anyone else except Hatake/Zall-herr/Barnabë etc, and except for the dozens of calls directed to admin 1|2|3k to protect the neutral version of "Misto Treska" article from Hatake and his 15 sockpuppets malicious and dirty attacks pushing the same POV. We’re not surprised that admin 1|2|3k and Master Hatake share the same negative POV at this article.[2] You've been backing him up regularly, you granted him the privilege of the controller, and you've always approved vandalism that Hatake did to the referenced materials, leaving malicious variants that stain the figure of a dead person 25 years ago (!!!), despite calls by his family members [3] that made you know that they have denounced this unstable human being to the police [4] . Accept here openly that you are a supporter of this vandal and block me, User Arkivisti, User Udha, X, Y and anyone else who doesn't think alike Hatake. You never blocked him, another administrator did, and just for one week waiting for checkuser result here. Go on and block us all, as your Master Hatake orders you. Have a look at "Misto Treska" revision history [5] , there are plenty of IPs who vandalized the article and are still free to vandalize everywhere else as you didn't block them![6] [7] --SnSlol (talk) 22:05, 9 May 2018 (CEST)

I find it interesting that user:1l2l3k didn't need any checkuser confirmation in order to block user:Cinephile-al on SQwiki for creating socks, yet he refuses to block Hatake's sock Zall-Herr, despite him being confirmed as a sock on Meta. User:1l2l3k also isn't blocking User:Barnabe Trohasi despite the fact that he pretty much admitted he's Hatake.see here User:1l2l3k has no problem with blocking IPs for supposedly being socks of banned users, especially of those users who have accused him of abusing his position as a (temporary) administrator. He blocked user:SnSlol and an IP with 2 edits for supposedly being a sock of user:Cinephile-al (see his accusations against 1l2l3k above)2, and also an IP with 1 edit for supposedly being my sock.[3. On the other hand he didn't block the vandalist IP 185.22.172.17 for being a sock of Hatake despite the behavioral evidence I presented above; on the contrary he added that IP to the checkuser request here. It is evident that user:1l2l3k uses double standards. He supports Hatake and retaliates against those who speak out about his abuses. Talking about double standards and retaliation, he reverted back all the vandalism made by 185.22.172.17 except for the vandalism that IP made on my User Page.--Udha (talk) 07:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please take local discussions to local. — regards, Revi 09:00, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed and no comment about the IP --Alaa :)..! 22:02, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cinephile-al@sq.wikipedia

Good to see that after my last comment here you reflected about some of your mistakes and double standards and decided to finally report user:Cinephile-al properly. The report comes a little late as you already blocked some users above under the pretext of being "socks" of Cinephile-al (1, and that with NO confirmation, and on top of that you also asked the community on Albanian Wikipedia to vote on permanently blocking @Cinephile-al:. One of the reasons you gave there is that after being banned he socked with new accounts and IPs, vandalizing and insulting. Again you had no confirmation for your claims, yet you asked the community to block him permanently. This happened after he criticized you here for your abuses. On the other hand you still refuse to block a confirmed sockpuppet of Hatake, which is one of the accusations user:Cinephile-al made against you.--Udha (talk) 14:34, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'm not going to comment here further as this seems to be improper. I'm sorry.--Udha (talk) 15:02, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not doing the check but  No comment with respect to IP address(es). — regards, Revi 16:13, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Φαλτσέτα@el.wikipedia

A trolling request modeled after the case "Νικόλας Παπαποστόλου@el.wikipedia" by user "I will apologise" / "Νικόλας Παπαποστόλου" (= user "Ελλ" = user "Digital Greece"; see "Ελλ@el.wikipedia"). User "Φαλτσέτα" (obviously a sock) claims to be user "Νικόλας Παπαποστόλου" [8] [9], but its is not clear whether he is actually "Νικόλας Παπαποστόλου", or is user "Tακλαμακαν" (an idle, stale account). "Tακλαμακαν" is a sockmaster and troll active in the Greek-language WP thru its socks and an army of IPs (see my remarks in the above link to "Ελλ@el.wikipedia", [10]). "Tακλαμακαν", as shown especially in the case of his socks "ΕρΚιλλ" and "Μαντίνγκο" [11], had created a sockpuppet specially designed to look like someone else's sock in order to frame the other user and bring confusion to the rest of us in the Greek-language WP. ——Chalk19 (talk) 12:10, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trolling request for you, because it will proove you wrong. First you called "Ελλ" as "Παπαποστόλου" (in the request of "Νικόλας Παπαποστόλου@el.wikipedia you have spoken for "former accusations for accusations about me and Τακλαμακαν) and today you are accussating me that i'm Τακλαμακαν! Now, who is the troller?--Φαλτσέτα (talk) 13:20, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BTW in Greek wikipedia i blocked by MARKELLOS as "Νικόλας Παπαποστόλου" but in my user page there is a sign that i'm a puppet of Τακλαμακαν. Anyways.--Φαλτσέτα (talk) 13:23, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

update No reason to run this CU. In the meantime, user "Φαλτσέτα" has been blocked indefinitely (June 2nd) in the in the Greek-language WP for improper use of multiple accounts. ——Chalk19 (talk) 07:16, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedian from Greece@el.wikipedia

Ebregtpec@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 09:34, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Completed:

  1.  Confirmed: NaIRvigation, Careexdepartm
  2. Ebregtpec
  3.  Confirmed: KNstaff, Mymliou
  • Group 1 and 2 are Likely Likely.
  • Group 3 is Unrelated Unrelated to the 1 and 2.

Bold usernames are usernames not in check target. Italicized usernames are not blocked on local as of 09:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

— regards, Revi 09:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--云间守望 - (Talk with WQL) 09:54, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MidnightSun2400@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 10:28, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Completed:

  •  Technically indistinguishable: MidnightSun2400, Ach1ys, DivotusMaximus, LumpyPotato, BreweryBrew

— regards, Revi 10:57, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorscontent1@ro.wikipedia

Unrelated Unrelated Ruslik (talk) 20:05, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Added user Sourscecontent1.Andrei Stroe (talk) 08:56, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Adding ZzhunterzZ12: unusual interest for the situation coming from a new user. Gikü (talk) 10:36, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ŝorcecontent1, Sorccontent1, ZzhunterzZ12 and Surscont are  Confirmed - they are the same user. Jose Toy Zn are Nzeza Pro are also Likely Likely. Sourscecontent1 is Possible Possible as well. Ruslik (talk) 08:33, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hychiang@zh.wikipedia

Note on that Aris Wu and Alia Ritchie are both CU blocked per en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hychiang. Willyhu was probably not blocked due to the account being stale. Alex Shih (talk) 18:01, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alex Shih: ENWIKI's CU result is wrong, so here is a re-request. Sæn 02:27, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Would you mind to back up your assertion? -Mys_721tx (talk) 02:33, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As above. I do TRUST their checkusers. Also, the DATA SET is different in these two occasions.--1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 03:05, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Doing... — regards, Revi 11:00, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Completed:

  1.  Confirmed: Hychiang, Aris Wu, Willyhu, Alia Ritchie
  2.  Confirmed: Tornado789, Aristotle Ryo, Domopan, Snowjon888, Meli Ryo, Maxinelau[1]

  • Group 1 and 2 are Likely Likely.
  1. Low confidence, not enough data.

— regards, Revi 11:52, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@-revi: Does the low confidence apply to group 2 as a whole or to Maxinelau only? -Mys_721tx (talk) 18:28, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Maxinelau only. — regards, Revi 18:32, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ewasszx@zh.wikipedia

Aris Wu@zh.wikipedia

Declined in favor of earlier request. — regards, Revi 13:16, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Babalja @sq.wikipedia

Doing... --Alaa :)..! 21:52, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed --Alaa :)..! 21:58, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TP-Linkben@zh.wikipedia

1|2|3k @sq.wikipedia

Duplicate of declined request Steward requests/Checkuser/2018-06#1|2|3k @sq.wikipedia. — regards, Revi 14:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tsiusing106@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 11:27, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Completed:


  • Bold: Users not in CU request.
  • Italics: Users not blocked on zhwiki as of 11:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC).
    • Bold and italics: both bold and italics.

All the checks on meta are primarily based on technical data and  Behavioural evidence needs evaluation. — regards, Revi 11:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See also