Jump to content

Steward requests/Checkuser

Edit links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by -revi (talk | contribs) at 10:10, 17 May 2018 (→‎Jessechi@zh.wikipedia: result). It may differ significantly from the current version.
Shortcut:
SRCU
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}:  Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale
{{Declined}}:  Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}:  It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball

This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also requesting checkuser access). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.

Before making a request:

  1. Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.
  2. Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using diff links or other evidence.
  3. Make sure there are no local checkusers.
  4. Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:


How to make a request

How to make a request:

  • Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also {{srcu}} help). 
    === Username@xx.project ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = 
 |project shortcut= 
 |user name1      = 
 |user name2      = 
 |user name3      = 
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
 |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
}}

    For example: 

    === Example@en.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = en
 |project shortcut= w
 |user name1      = Example
 |user name2      = Foo
 |user name3      = Bar
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
 |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
}}
  • Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.
Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests

Μαυρο Μαργαριταρι@el.wikipedia

Status:    In progress
List of users
Μαυρο Μαργαριταρι (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Μαδαρός (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Vrahomarinaner (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Επισκεπτήριος (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Tina ftore (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
ΜάκηςΚεφαλονίτης (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Ερωφίλη (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Ορενόκος (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Mangaolo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Crveno belli (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): Μαυρο Μαργαριταρι exhibits the same editing pattern of blind reverts and silly vandalism as Μαδαρός in the elwiki article on the battle of Crete (el:Μάχη της Κρήτης -- please check the article's history page).

The former is an account that was activated and started editing the article only a short while after the latter was blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet. There may well be a number of sleepers, as the sockmaster (Vrahomarinaner, whose account has also been indefinitely blocked) tends to edit WP using a large number of accounts (as previously confirmed after CU requests here) or as an IP. Ασμοδαίος (talk) 18:44, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
CheckUser requests are not votes or discussions. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:37, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ignore the above request. The last comment is obviouσly trolling. The other usernnames should probably checked.--MARKELLOSLeave me a message 16:03, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pertonax@global

Status:    In progress
List of users
Imiter1 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Doroti2017 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Esperanto9999 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Rmcharb (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Stclair1 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Worlock1 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Spammers, most of them IPs from several ranges, the whole set is here: Talk:Spam_blacklist#redirects_to_href.li (still growing as I am generating COIBot reports). First set of domains is blacklisted. The spammers typically replace official websites with their domains, which turn out to be redirects through href.li to the original domains but with added codes (e.g. naughtyamerica.top is a redirect to href.li/?hXXp://natour.naughtyamerica.com/track/MTEyNjgzLjEyLjguOC4wLjAuMC4wLjA (mainmed http to hXXp); only brazzers.network seems not to be a redirect). Some of the underlying IP-ranges are VPNs and webhost which need global blocking. Please check if there are more ranges that need blocking. Note, there is no master-sock here, I chose Pertonax as the only named account used for two different domains. --Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 19:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that except Esperanto9999 all others would be Stale as CU data is only kept for a short period of time. No check user query ran here. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 20:19, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@MarcoAurelio: I keep finding more IPs, users and domains, but I see that CheckUser is not going to help on those either. I may however need a hand to have any (underlying) ranges globally blocked, they seem to be using open proxies and VPNs. --Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 15:20, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@MarcoAurelio: any new thing on this request? --Alaa :)..! 12:39, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't handle SRCU requests nowadays. None of the accounts provided above have any IP data we can query as it's expired, as I said above though. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:54, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mymliou@zh.wikipedia

Status:    In progress
List of users
Mymliou (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Babišfirst (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Navigationm (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
AOdawgjavn (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Entnavigati (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Jkforumnoone (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
ProgresTranspacificnershi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Enduranceoc (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
ErviceLocationu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
反濫權者 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Copyangry7fcvc use the sock ID and IP address usually,and he had indefinite blocks to him,please check it and find other sock for Copyangry7fcvc,and 反濫權者 has expressed longstanding grudge against Outlookxp and other Chinese Wikipedia administrators,and I think 反濫權者 is the sock of Copyangry7fcvc likely.--MCC214 (talk) 09:02, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jessechi@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Jessechi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Qwu105730 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Aq3151 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Translating & Transferring request: Refering to w:zh:User_talk:Qwu105730, we would need technical information about whether this user is related to the cross-wiki LTA Jessechi in order to review his unblock request.Jessechi is a user abusing in zhwiki for a long time, and has been consistently using sock-puupets (see zh:Category:Jessechi的維基用戶分身, if you need more data points for CU). Thank you. --Innocentius Aiolos 13:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Jessechi is, as you probably know, Stale before we start.
From the category, User:1by1, User:13adqezc, User:13579ol, User:3wsdr4, User:9to9, User:Aq3151, User:Aisidi, User:A8756, User:Atqatq, User:Coffeecorner, User:Eaaarataha, User:Goog00, User:Ilikehk, User:Kokookooo, User:Kiwiwoko, User:Mainaccount has been last active during March. (That category is big enough, so first page and last edit (via NavPopup) analyzed. — regards, Revi 16:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Again, thank you revi for the analysis. However, please be aware that we haven't check Jessechi and his puppets from last November and most (if not all) of the accounts banned came from the  It looks like a duck to me decision from local sysops. I'm not saying that their interpretation was wrong, but there exist possibilities that some of these accounts might not be Jessechi. --Innocentius Aiolos 16:38, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't check result, I was just glancing over the category and trying to find a list of sock to compare with. I'm not doing the check for now. — regards, Revi 16:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I added a username, Aq3151, since Aq3151 and Qwu105730 had made similar disruptive edits in w:zh:2018年中華民國直轄市長及縣市長選舉. --云间守望 - (Talk with WQL) 12:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Doing... — regards, Revi 09:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Completed Completed:

  • Qwu105730, Aq3151, Aisidi, 13adqezc are each other Unrelated Unrelated from technical point of view.
  • Last two accounts are selected from the sock cat.
  • 13adqezc was able to contribute by bypassing SOCK rangeblock designated anonymous-only.

— regards, Revi 10:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hatake@sq.wikipedia

Status:    In progress
List of users
Hatake (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Zall-herr (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Barnabë Trohasi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
185.22.172.17 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): User:Hatake (master) is a prolific sock creator in the Albanian Wikipedia (SQwiki), who is inofficially backed and encouraged by one administrator there. He refuses to block his new sockpuppets even when there is evident proof that they're sockpuppets. Ever since he was blocked in January he has been creating one sockpuppet after another. These include: User:Llazgo, User:Fapaf, User:Qiqrra etc. As soon as his latest socks User:GjonBdeku and user:Dedalia were discovered and blocked, after a checkuser request here, we suspect that he created a new sockpuppet called user:Zall-herr. This new user seems experienced and in just a few days he has edited a lot of articles Hatake and his socks edited as well. User:Zall-herr is the new sockpuppet created by User:Hatake in SQwiki. He insults and attacks people all the time (example: Misto Treska ). I have behavioral evidence as well, this means that the case is confirmed. As one of the people attacked by him, I confirm Zall-herr is just another sockpuppet of Hatake, created just 1 day after his latest socks user:Dedalia and user:GjonBdeku were discovered and blocked. If the administrator 1l2l3k wanted Hatake's sock Zall-herr to be blocked, he would've been blocked by now. It's two weeks since Zall-herr was confirmed as a sock, yet 1l2l3k didn't lift a finger to block him. 1l2l3k is the same admin who blocked a random anonymous IP with 1 edit for being a "sock of Udha", despite his behavior showing no correlation to user:Udha.1 Also he blocked user:Arkivisti with no reason (Arkivisti was just asking to protect article [1] from vandalism!!!) encouraging Zall-herr and giving him privileges to control most articles in SQwiki. Yet somehow he cannot recognize a sock by Hatake even when he's presented with evidence, even after we successfully discovered 13 Hatake socks on our own since December while informing him (1) first about each new sock?! 1l2l3k even has a personal list of most Hatake socks! Please help us, as we don't know how to stop him.

--Cinephile-al (talk) 11:11, 7 May 2018 (CEST)

CheckUser requests are not votes or discussions. — regards, Revi 09:00, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Instead of copying and reposting my archived request, you could've just continued the discussion there. Contrary to what 1l2l3k claims here, he most likely knows Zall-herr is a sock, as he explicitly asked him this on his talk page.1 Why would one ask X out of the blue if he was Y unless he actually suspects him of being Y?--Udha (talk) 12:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You're right Udha. I don't understand why they don't block Hatake and his sockpuppets forever from Wikipedia (not just for one week or one month). If there is anyone still doubting, just have a look at what's happening at SQwiki in the last days... More than 15 sockpuppets created by Hatake! With all that behavioral evidence as well, I just can't realize how this can be possible.--Cinephile-al (talk) 15:23, 8 May 2018 (CEST)
@Cinephile-al: user:Ruslik0 said it's confirmed if there is behavioral evidence1, and 1l2l3k sees the behavioral evidence too 1 otherwise he wouldn't have asked him if he's Hatake, so if he refuses to admit it and block Zall-Herr then just go to another administrator.--Udha (talk) 17:20, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, Zall-herr is currently blocked in sqwiki, and we are awaiting for the conclusions of this report to decide whether to perm block him, or not. --1l2l3k (talk) 17:28, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, you didn't block him. Another admin did. You had plenty of time to do so but you refused, as you claimed here that there was no behavioral evidence, but as I showed in my post above you were lying. You did indeed see behavioral evidence but you refused to act. I'm not the only who's surprised by this.--Udha (talk) 17:57, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The IP user:1l2l3k added to the checkuser request, started throwing a fit, vandalizing articles related to communism but also artists and historians whom user:Hatake views as being communist. For the record, Hatake is an ardent anti-communist. The IP started throwing insults. Then when he vandalized some of my articles like this one instead of giving a reason he insulted me "pis i paburre" (Hatake often calls me "unmanly"). Then he vandalized another article including words like "unmanly" and "wicked" in the reasoning (In Albanian wicked is "i paUDHË", a word play for my username Udha)2. When an anonymous IP reverted his vandalism, the troll IP reverted all the edits back giving something like "I reverted Udha" as a reason and throwing some additional insults at me. He then went on to vandalize my User Page and accuse another user of being my sock. Afterwards he created the account User:Barnabë Trohasi. Besides pretty much openly admitting that he's Hatake in his very first edit, insulting the "communists" on SQwiki, he reverted some of his vandalism back, but continued insulting me with his new account "pis i flliqt"--Udha (talk) 18:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That’s true. Admin 1|2|3k didn’t block Hatake sock Zall-herr, but admin Liridon did it yesterday and just for one week (waiting for checkuser response here). Instead of reporting other people here with no relevance at all, instead of supporting Zall-herr in every article, instead of blocking one of the best contributors in SQwiki for 3 months (!!! user:Udha); Administrator 1|2|3k should block Hatake, the Master of Puppets in SQwiki, responsible for all the mess. 09:43, 9 May 2018 (CEST)

There is no vandalism by anyone else except Hatake/Zall-herr/Barnabë etc, and except for the dozens of calls directed to admin 1|2|3k to protect the neutral version of "Misto Treska" article from Hatake and his 15 sockpuppets malicious and dirty attacks pushing the same POV. We’re not surprised that admin 1|2|3k and Master Hatake share the same negative POV at this article.[2] You've been backing him up regularly, you granted him the privilege of the controller, and you've always approved vandalism that Hatake did to the referenced materials, leaving malicious variants that stain the figure of a dead person 25 years ago (!!!), despite calls by his family members [3] that made you know that they have denounced this unstable human being to the police [4] . Accept here openly that you are a supporter of this vandal and block me, User Arkivisti, User Udha, X, Y and anyone else who doesn't think alike Hatake. You never blocked him, another administrator did, and just for one week waiting for checkuser result here. Go on and block us all, as your Master Hatake orders you. Have a look at "Misto Treska" revision history [5] , there are plenty of IPs who vandalized the article and are still free to vandalize everywhere else as you didn't block them![6] [7] --SnSlol (talk) 22:05, 9 May 2018 (CEST)

I find it interesting that user:1l2l3k didn't need any checkuser confirmation in order to block user:Cinephile-al on SQwiki for creating socks, yet he refuses to block Hatake's sock Zall-Herr, despite him being confirmed as a sock on Meta. User:1l2l3k also isn't blocking User:Barnabe Trohasi despite the fact that he pretty much admitted he's Hatake.see here User:1l2l3k has no problem with blocking IPs for supposedly being socks of banned users, especially of those users who have accused him of abusing his position as a (temporary) administrator. He blocked user:SnSlol and an IP with 2 edits for supposedly being a sock of user:Cinephile-al (see his accusations against 1l2l3k above)2, and also an IP with 1 edit for supposedly being my sock.[3. On the other hand he didn't block the vandalist IP 185.22.172.17 for being a sock of Hatake despite the behavioral evidence I presented above; on the contrary he added that IP to the checkuser request here. It is evident that user:1l2l3k uses double standards. He supports Hatake and retaliates against those who speak out about his abuses. Talking about double standards and retaliation, he reverted back all the vandalism made by 185.22.172.17 except for the vandalism that IP made on my User Page.--Udha (talk) 07:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please take local discussions to local. — regards, Revi 09:00, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Constantin Boss@ro.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Constantin Boss (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Toader Costi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Harmful activity on cartoon articles. Toader Costi was blocked for lack of sources and the use of Wikipedia as a crystal globe, see WP:SPECULATION, after 4 days the account Constantin Boss appeared with similar name (Costi is diminutive name of Constantin) and the same type of activity. The verification was discussed at ro:Discuție_Utilizator:DieselEngineRO#Avertizări_fără_efect.--DieselEngineRO (talk) 16:53, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed as well as Toader Boss. Ruslik (talk) 20:55, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you.--DieselEngineRO (talk) 11:41, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ελλ@el.wikipedia

Status:    In progress
List of users
Ελλ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
ΕρΚιλλ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Τακλαμακαν (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Similar behaviour/edit patterns have been identified in most contributions by the following three users Ελλ, ΕρΚιλλ and Τακλαμαν. Moreover, several editors on Greek Wikipedia have expressed serious concerns and frustration about 'Ελλ' who not only has legally threatened other users as a result of ideological disagreements, but almost simultaneously seems to use other accounts after being banned in order to respond to the community. I can confirm that his rhetoric is strongly connected to far-right and orthodox beliefs, which is reflected in his overall behaviour and hence can be regarded as an identifiable POV. Please, could you have a look at my request and respond whether all three above-mentioned users have a connection to each other or not. Thanks in advance. Glucken123 (talk) 13:51, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Glucken has insult other users. For example he/she has say "go to a psychiatric hospital psycho. There will come cops and you will run to hide. Go away moron with your stubid ideas." diff. Propagandise and mocks against Christians, and whosoever who does not agree agree with him/her he/she calls him mockingly "far-right" while he offenced because i called a wikipedian "left"! Also, he changes my words and wants from admins to block me. Do you want diffs? To concluse, you, the stewards are free to search whatever and anything from me. Ah and User:Glucken123 make and a request for User:Μαντίνγκο and you. As you say you aren't him then why to fear?--Ελλ (talk) 15:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ελλ, who is currently banned from the Greek Wikipedia, had multiple chances and opportunities to comply to the rules and despite the many warnings from administrators, he kept vandalising and also abusing other users by verbally assaulting or in some cases threatening them. Another well-used tactic that can be seen in his above-mentioned response, is the rhetoric of reverse accusation. A person (in this case me) who has expressed a very specific concern about him being a sock puppet, is unfairly targeted with random accusations (e.g me being a sock puppet). I consider this to be an attempt to turn the spotlight on unimportant issues. This is another example of breaching the rules, as from what I understand this section is not a vote or debate, but only a platform to report misbehaviour within the whole community. Furthermore, his constant attempts to accuse other users of anti-democratic or anti-christian tactics is simply flawed. What he really does is remove validated content from pages that he considers to be either anti-christian or against his own beliefs (that is another breach of POV). If you have any doubts about this, a look at his bans will immediately convince you. To address the ridiculous accusations about me being a sock puppet, he previously expressed a number of concerns regarding my intentions. Of course, I have directed him to this page in case he wanted to investigate this - he didn't and laughed off my suggestions. Hence, his response above is not only a clear breach of rules, but also an unnecessary distraction from the true issue regarding his activity. If an administrator could perform the checkuser, it would be greatly appreciated. In case you need me to provide any other information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Glucken123 (talk) 18:35, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ruslik and Revi, do I need to provide more information for the check? Hope I am not missing something, thanks. Glucken123 (talk) 12:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lj019960@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Lj019960 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
C199600 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
B19961996 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
J19961996 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Confirmed that are socks via duck test, want to look if there is any sleepers. --B dash (talk) 08:11, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
They are: C199600, B19961996, A19961996, J19961996, Lj196196 and Lj019960. Ruslik (talk) 20:39, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Linoilo@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
Linoilo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
陳建閔 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Nivi5487 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): 陳建閔 and Linoilo added promotional content in zh:新北市私立及人高級中學. Niv 5487 create a new article zh:新北市及人中學, to escape from the three-revert rule in 新北市私立及人高級中學. --B dash (talk) 08:11, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
While it is not mandatory, please see zh:WP:互助客栈/其他/存档/2018年4月#關於元維基的CU問題. I thought there was de facto community consensus on zhwiki that zhwiki CU requests were to take some local discussion before coming to meta, unless you have justifiable emergency reason. — regards, Revi 10:32, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done, per above. — regards, Revi 11:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cinephile-al@sq.wikipedia

Status:    In progress
List of users
Cinephile-al (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Arkivisti (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
SnSlol (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
79.171.53.95 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
79.171.53.101 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
134.0.58.52 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
79.171.53.230 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): User Cinephile-al, Arkivisti, Snsol, and other IPs all push the same POV at the article Misto Treska in sqwiki. Cinephile-al is the master (edited earlier) and often edits under an IP. Arkivisti (the sock, as it started editing later) was blocked for disruption. When blocked, he returned to his older account, Cinephile-al. In addition all of these folks keep deleting sourced material, threatening all editors involved. Engagement in the talk page is minimal, and while no source is disputed, the same person wants the article deleted. Instead of following the proper deletion procedures the same person is involved merely in deleting article and relative talk page. Article is protected as a result of the insane persistence of this individual. --1l2l3k (talk) 13:23, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Good to see that after my last comment here you reflected about some of your mistakes and double standards and decided to finally report user:Cinephile-al properly. The report comes a little late as you already blocked some users above under the pretext of being "socks" of Cinephile-al (1, and that with NO confirmation, and on top of that you also asked the community on Albanian Wikipedia to vote on permanently blocking @Cinephile-al:. One of the reasons you gave there is that after being banned he socked with new accounts and IPs, vandalizing and insulting. Again you had no confirmation for your claims, yet you asked the community to block him permanently. This happened after he criticized you here for your abuses. On the other hand you still refuse to block a confirmed sockpuppet of Hatake, which is one of the accusations user:Cinephile-al made against you.--Udha (talk) 14:34, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'm not going to comment here further as this seems to be improper. I'm sorry.--Udha (talk) 15:02, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not doing the check but  No comment with respect to IP address(es). — regards, Revi 16:13, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser&oldid=18052990"