Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2020/Votes/Jfblanc

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2020 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: en, oc, cs, ca, fr, es, sk, it, la
  • Personal info: (English)
    Dears, I'm a candidate to the position of Steward to increment one step up my contribution to this universe I am so fond of. My name is Joan Francés Banc (officially for now Jean-François Blanc). I am a sysop and bureaucrat of the Occitan language Wikipedia, and also a regular contributor the oc-wp and to other projects (63404 edits on 740 wikis. Most edits on oc.wikipedia.org (35342). Oldest account on oc.wikipedia.org (2005-09-16 13:34)). I want to help more an bring my "lesser used language" perspective to the stewardry. Feel free to ask any question.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2020/Questions#Jfblanc


Yes

[edit]
  1. Holder (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020  --Holder (talk) 16:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  2. Krzysiek 123456789 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020   Krzysiek 123456789 (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  3. Darwwin (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020   Darwwin (talk) 06:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  4. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Gereon K. (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  5. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Dostojewskij (talk) 21:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  6. Šedrvan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Šedrvan (talk) 09:57, 10 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  7. Veracious (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Veracious (talk) 14:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  8. Perrak (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Perrak (talk) 17:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  9. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Fenikals (talk) 18:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  10. MJL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Purely moral support. –MJLTalk 23:14, 10 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  11. Tuvalkin (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   I met Jfblanc online back in the 1990s and since then I have seen him several times excelling at conflict resolution and team-building. I have a good impression and we all will gain with Jfblanc as a steward. Tuvalkin (talk) 00:02, 11 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  12. WrS.tm.pl (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020   WrS.tm.pl (talk) 03:09, 11 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  13. Peko (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Peko (talk) 12:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  14. Axel xadolik (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Axel xadolik (talk) 11:35, 12 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  15. Globalphilosophy (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   --Globalphilosophy (-̮̮̃•̃) (ღTalk ♥) 16:13, 12 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  16. Arraque (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Arraque (talk) 14:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  17. Omondi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Omondi (talk) 20:22, 13 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  18. OSeveno (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   --oSeveno (talk) 12:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  19. LilyKitty (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   I hope multilingual development of Wikipedia and Wikimedia. LilyKitty (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  20. Onverwacht (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Onverwacht (talk) 07:09, 15 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  21. Dmehus (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   What MJL said. Dmehus (talk) 21:29, 15 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  22. Caligatus (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020  --Caligatus (talk) 22:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  23. Boobarkee (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Boobarkee (talk) 09:59, 19 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  24. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   Jusjih (talk) 03:19, 21 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  25. Chipermc (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Chipermc (talk) 04:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  26. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   --Ferran Mir (talk) 11:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC)reply
       Dany Crash (Not eligible, checked by xaosflux)   Dany Crash (talk) 23:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  27. Luensu1959 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   I like his engagement for regional wikis like Wiki Occitan Luensu1959 (talk) 10:39, 25 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  28. Epicgenius (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   epicgenius (talk) 21:26, 25 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  29. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   Novak Watchmen (talk) 22:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  30. Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (talk) 07:36, 27 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  31. Kubura (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Kubura (talk) 12:55, 28 February 2020 (UTC)reply

No

[edit]
  1. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Strong oppose Has no Hunch about crosswiki work and doesn't know the guidelines--𐐎ℹ𝕜ⅈ𝕭𝒂𝕪ⅇ𝕣 👤💬 14:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  2. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020   Oppose. Very little work in the cross-wiki/policy realm so we don't know what we're getting especially in sensitive issues. Also the log of blocks on ocwiki shows a serious misunderstanding of IPv6 and IPs in general, not good for someone who would have to make global blocks or use CheckUser. Rschen7754 14:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  3. -revi (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020   User:-revi/SEV; fails 1, non-response to my Q — regards, Revi 14:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  4. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   TonyBallioni (talk) 14:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  5. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Lack of experience and not satisfied with their answers. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  6. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   CptViraj (📧) 14:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  7. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Minorax (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  8. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Sorry, good faith nomination but you seemed not to know sufficient xwiki stuff based on questions and SUL. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  9. Turkmen (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020  --Turkmen talk 14:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  10. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Steinsplitter (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  11. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Doesn't understand the role of Stewards, has no experience in areas we expect of stewards or candidates for this position. Praxidicae (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  12. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   I believe that the candidate means well, but I'm afraid they lack knowledge and experience. I'm not satisfied with some of their answers. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  13. Érico (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   The candidate seems to be experienced in several projects and the language skills looks great. However, s/he did not demonstrate a good level of activities in the areas related to stewards. Also, the statement is not impressive – far from it. Érico (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  14. Stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   stwalkerster (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  15. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Does not understand the scope of the steward role Esteban16 (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  16. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   Not suitable. Trijnsteltalk 17:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  17. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   No experience. --Stïnger (会話) 18:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  18. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   --Mirer (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  19. RhinosF1 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Nomination suggest interested in rights not cross wiki work. Lack of experience RhinosF1 (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  20. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Ankry (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  21. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   *Youngjin (talk) 20:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  22. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   ToBeFree (talk) 21:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  23. Sintakso (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Unconvincing statement and answers Sintakso (talk) 21:57, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  24. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   per WikiBayer et al Klaas `Z4␟` V23:09, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  25. Nate 2169 (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   Nate 2169 (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  26. 片割れ靴下 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2020   片割れ靴下 (talk) 23:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  27. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Incorrect answers to my questions; I'm unfortunately not convinced that you'd be a good fit this time. Leaderboard (talk) 01:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  28. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Inexperienced overall with cross-wiki affairs but would be happy to reconsider after more global experience in a few years. Hiàn (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  29. Vermont (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Terrible answers to questions, and stopped answering them after some people replied. Evidently has very little understanding of what stewards do and the scope of the role. Vermont (talk) 03:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  30. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  31. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020   Armbrust (talk) 03:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  32. Hégésippe Cormier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Hégésippe | ±Θ± 09:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  33. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Replies to questions did not convince me. — Jules Talk 10:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  34. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020   Herby talk thyme 10:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  35. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020   1ForTheMoney (talk) 12:43, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  36. Thibaut120094 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Not convinced by the answers to the questions, lack of experience. Thibaut (talk) 13:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  37. Daniel J Zhao (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Daniel J Zhao (talk) 14:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  38. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   MZaplotnik(talk) 15:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  39. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Linedwell [talk] 19:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  40. Hadrianus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Hadrianus (talk) 19:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  41. Streetdeck (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   I can't support after I read the replication. --Wright Streetdeck 04:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  42. SickManWP (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   I no think he can do this very need job--SickManWP (talk) 05:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  43. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020   Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  44. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   cyrfaw (talk) 13:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  45. Vmavanti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Vmavanti (talk) 17:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  46. AFBorchert (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Thanks for the offer. While I think that experience with smaller projects could be a helpful addition to the steward team, I miss the necessary experience in the typical working fields of stewards (see questions by Vermont in the Q/A section). --AFBorchert (talk) 19:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  47. La coince (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Not convinced La coince (talk) 19:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  48. Waddie96 (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Not suitable Waddie96 (talk) 19:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  49. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   ~Cybularny Speak? 22:06, 10 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  50. Tymon.r (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Per your personal statement. Tymon.r (talk) 01:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  51. Mercy (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Does not have enough experience. Mercy (talk) 08:33, 11 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  52. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   – Ammarpad (talk) 11:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  53. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Rzuwig 11:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  54. Der-Wir-Ing (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Der-Wir-Ing ("DWI") talk 20:23, 11 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  55. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Statement, answers and cross-wiki experience are not matching expectations for the role. Meiræ 00:57, 12 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  56. The Living love (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   The Living love (talk) 01:45, 12 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  57. Grasyop (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Grasyop 18:20, 12 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  58. CactusWriter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   CactusWriter (talk) 15:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  59. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   No cross-wiki experience. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:05, 13 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  60. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   No cross-wiki experience and the candidate statement ("increment one step up") reads an awful lot like treating Wikimedia as an MMORPG. John M Wolfson (talk) 21:12, 13 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  61. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Inexperienced editor. –Davey2010Talk 22:50, 13 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  62. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   DannyS712 (talk) 05:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  63. DeltaQuad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Single wiki sysop with not great answers -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  64. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by Streetdeck)2020   Kurtis (talk) 04:07, 15 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  65. Mardus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Per argumnets by User:Rschen7754, though in not so strong terms. Mardus (talk) 12:13, 16 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  66. Nightenbelle (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   User is not ready, perhaps with more experience. Nightenbelle (talk) 15:03, 17 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  67. Cabeza2000 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Cabeza2000 (talk) 16:52, 17 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  68. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   It seems that user didn't perform its admin activities in the local wiki very often. --Uğurkenttalk 18:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  69. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Strong oppose as promoting a minor language isn't a reason why one would like to be a sysop. Disclosure of real-life identity (i.e. in this case your name) is totally inappropriate. WikiAviator (talk) 04:32, 19 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  70. Patriccck (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Per others Patriccck (talk) 13:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  71. OhKayeSierra (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   OhKayeSierra (talk) 04:22, 20 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  72. Tazkeung (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Tazkeung (talk) 09:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  73. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   — xaosflux Talk 14:21, 20 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  74. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Centaur271188 (talk) 14:09, 21 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  75. Pawnkingthree (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Pawnkingthree (talk) 14:17, 21 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  76. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Hannes 24 (talk) 17:40, 23 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  77. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Ameisenigel (talk) 19:25, 23 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  78. Zppix (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Zppix (talk) 18:18, 25 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  79. Brown Chocolate (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020   Brown Chocolate (talk) 10:08, 26 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  80. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 07:21, 27 February 2020 (UTC)reply
       Bucksburg (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Bucksburg (talk) 11:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  81. Eihel (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2020   I would like an Occitan and French speaker to be Stew, but your replies, not only to user:Leaderboard, have definitively dashed my hopes. In addition, there are missing replies. Eihel (talk) 20:05, 27 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  82. NickK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   An intersting profile, might have been a good fit, but finally no. I was interested in the answer on the question on consensus, and promising to have a look this week end a month and half ago and ultimately not answering is bad for a steward — NickK (talk) 13:52, 28 February 2020 (UTC)reply

Neutral

[edit]
  1. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Richardkiwi (talk) 14:49, 8 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  2. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   Miniapolis 16:20, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  3. ST47 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Could move to support based on upcoming answers to questions, but may not have a chance to based on the current vote tallies... ST47 (talk) 17:33, 9 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  4. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Stephan1000000 (talk) 12:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  5. Juanmachavez7 (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   Juanmachavez7 (talk) 01:21, 12 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  6. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 13:02, 13 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  7. Frettie (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   Frettie (talk) 18:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  8. NGC 54 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   --FonAfon (talk | contribs) 13:03, 14 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  9. JogiAsad (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   JogiAsad (talk) 13:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  10. Rots61 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Rots61 (talk) 16:09, 14 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  11. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Geonuch (talk) 01:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  12. AGK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   AGK ■ 07:57, 17 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  13. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Poti Berik (talk) 08:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  14. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Darkhan 16:43, 20 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  15. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Garam talk 18:42, 21 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  16. Tomec (Eligible, checked by OhKayeSierra)2020   Tomec (talk) 22:28, 22 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  17. TJH2018 (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   TJH2018talk 22:28, 24 February 2020 (UTC)reply
  18. Stephan Tournay (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   Stephan Tournay (talk) 22:54, 24 February 2020 (UTC)reply