Steward requests/Global permissions
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).
Quick navigation:Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests for global rollback permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global rollback for Hamish
- Global user: Hamish (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 18 May 2020 11:59 UTC
I've been monitoring global edits via SWViewer for a few months, I think I deserve this permission to help me do better. I am the sysop in both zhwiki and mediawiki.org, this makes me have a good understanding about the tool so I will use it properly. Regards, --Hamish 11:59, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support clear use case. --Minorax (talk) 12:01, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Neutral I am bit confused actually, Cross wiki matrix shows good numbers but, most of their edits on various projects are file renames on commons (correct me if I am wrong!). They have made approximately 1500 edits in cross wiki work so they are familiar with overall work but, reverts on the project where they are not familiar with the language are lacking. Global rollbacker needs to identify vandalism beyond language barriers. So, though they have a good standing in their home projects and good intentions and need for the rights too. I am not much convince to support. Maybe some more time is needed? I might change my vote if someone points out that my observations are wrong. thanks and regards. -- QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:15, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support --May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 15:21, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support · No concerns. -- CptViraj () 15:35, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support, sure. —Sgd. Hasley 19:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support While I am with QueerEcofeminist for the point of GRename of files, I am confident they can use the tools properly. Just hope they can take it slow at areas they don't understand (i.e. languages they don't know or etc) and skip those they are not that sure in. I will typically expect slightly more crosswiki experiences from actual reverting but their overall knowledge of crosswiki work seems adequate via SRG and IRC requests and etc. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 07:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Strong support A drive by becuase you can always become a global rollbacker with Global Twinkle. Can I Log In (talk) 16:13, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support No issues. Thank you for volunteering, Vermont (talk) 16:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support --𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 06:52, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support I see no issues here. -- Enfcer (talk) 19:44, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support -FASTILY 01:17, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support Yes, you deserve it :) --Esteban16 (talk) 16:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support very active SWMT member.--Turkmen talk 19:47, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support, no concerns. Trusted enough to handle GR tools. Happy Birthday in advance! Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 06:51, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Strong support: Per all. Keep going on. --Wright Streetdeck 14:57, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support, keep it up dude. --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 06:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support Looks fine. Leaderboard (talk) 07:36, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support no issue. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 09:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Geonuch (talk) 13:38, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Несмир Кудилович (разговор) 20:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support --SecurityXP 10:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support, seen their work, no issues. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Matiia (talk) 16:52, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Requests for global sysop permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global sysop for Faz2020
- Global user: Faz2020 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 30 May 2020 08:08 UTC
I need to become an administrator global because i need to try admin tools. I only have 30+ edits globally, so, approve me anyway. --Faz2020 (talk) 08:09, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose To low number of edits. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 08:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
+ Support Approve me anyway. --Faz2020 (talk) 08:12, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Not done (non-steward) Allow me to close this per IAR, absolutely he is not so familiar with our policy and possibly a xwiki abuser per edits in eswiki. --Hamish 11:21, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Global sysop for A
- Global user: A (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 31 May 2020 05:14 UTC
I would like to apply for Global Sysop right to help Vietnamese Wikimedia projects that are currently suffering from massive vandalism, ([1], [2]) while most projects, with the exception of Wikipedia, are understaffed. I currently have the rollback rights for Vietnamese Wikipedia and Commons, IP block exempt for Vietnamese Wikivoyage. As for the sysop experience, I was temporarily sysop for Vietnamese Wikivoyage back in 2013 when I still used my former account TRMC (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email). Apart from Vietnamese, I can speak English, German, French and Chinese so I may help projects in other languages if necessary.--A (talk) 05:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- There are only three projects in question, and you have very few edits on them. Why not apply for local administrator userrights? Vermont (talk) 05:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Our Vietnamese community has had to do a lot lately when it comes to sockpuppets and vandalism. Most recently, a sockpuppeteers with almost 50 sockpuppets caused major problems in the Vietnamese Wikipedia. What is more dangerous is that vandalism from vi.wikipedia has shifted to other, smaller projects since they don't have the personal to protect themselves from those attacks. Since not only one project is affected, I think that GS right would a more effective counteraction against vandalism. I haven't made many edits to other Vietnamese projects since I changed my username, but I think with my experience at Commons and Wikipedia, I could do my best to help the GS team.--A (talk) 06:20, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Why not start with global rollback instead? Leaderboard (talk) 07:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Rollback is a great tool and I've had a lot of experience with it, but it doesn't help much if those users are still able to revert all of my reverts as I can't block them. That why GS flag will help me a lot in preventing cross wikis vandalism.--A (talk) 07:50, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Why not start with global rollback instead? Leaderboard (talk) 07:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Our Vietnamese community has had to do a lot lately when it comes to sockpuppets and vandalism. Most recently, a sockpuppeteers with almost 50 sockpuppets caused major problems in the Vietnamese Wikipedia. What is more dangerous is that vandalism from vi.wikipedia has shifted to other, smaller projects since they don't have the personal to protect themselves from those attacks. Since not only one project is affected, I think that GS right would a more effective counteraction against vandalism. I haven't made many edits to other Vietnamese projects since I changed my username, but I think with my experience at Commons and Wikipedia, I could do my best to help the GS team.--A (talk) 06:20, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose You have 7000 edits in viwiki and at Commons, in other wikis have you no much edits. The use in 3 Vi projects is not what Global Sysops do. Global Sysop is there for 800 projects, so use in 3 projects is not sufficient.--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 07:38, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Neutral, per WikiBayer above. Please go for local adminship first, then global rollback to global sysop. 114.129.199.90 09:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Question: Why don't you try to request for local permissions.--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 11:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, after thinking for a while, I cancel this request and will try to request for local permission, firstly to gain experience and secondly to build trust.--A (talk) 11:59, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Requests for global rename permissions
Steward requests/Global permissions/Global renamers
Global rename for ShahadatHossain
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: ShahadatHossain (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 29 May 2020 16:45 UTC
Hi, I'm an bn-wikibooks Admin and also contribute in others wiki project. There have no rename user, As a result, if someone wants to change the username, it is not possible to do so at the local level. I have been a trusted administrator on Wikibooks for 4th term as an administrator and interface administrator. I also try to contribute to other language projects including Wikipedia, Commons.-Shahadat Hossain (talk) 16:45, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support, Does have enough experience as an administrator on the Bangla Wikipedia, been serving our community for five years now. 113.158.209.121 03:59, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Could you give an example of a user wanting their account renamed on bnwikibooks? Vermont (talk) 04:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Vermont Since Wikibooks does not have a renamer, users are encouraged to apply to Meta. Wikibooks has stopped accepting renaming applications on its project page. Please check bn wikibooks project page. If I get this right, it is possible to apply for name change in that project. I am also active in other projects, I can work on all those projects, such as Wikipedia, Wikivoyage, Commons and others. You can trust me as a loyal user. I also previously worked as an OTRS member. In addition, I was honored as the Asian Ambassador in 2019 in the Bengali Wikipedia project, see here.-Shahadat Hossain (talk) 06:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support. ~ MS Sakib (talk) 06:46, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Strong support I am agree with Shahadat and I hope he was very perfect on this.-Foysalur Rahman Shuvo (talk) 07:33, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Strong support. I agree with Shahadat and I hope he was very perfect in this regard.~SHEKH (Talk) 08:21, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Nahian~bnwiki (talk) 08:29, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose concerned about the block on enwiki that the user was just recently unblocked from.-BRP ever 07:27, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- As above, I want to see a clear explanation for your en.wiki block history. This does not necessarily mean that I'll oppose your request, but you clearly had a bad tussle there. Leaderboard (talk) 07:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per 2 earlier opposes. The user has been unblocked recently. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 07:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Previously blocked indefinitely on the English Wikipedia because of advertising/spam. 114.129.199.90 09:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per a number of the above --Herby talk thyme 13:04, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Strong oppose I cannot support an editor who was indef-blocked at en.wikipedia just a few days ago, without a clear explanation. Sincerely, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 13:09, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Because of block history on enwiki. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Have indef-blocked in enwiki.--SecurityXP 12:42, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Strong oppose due to the very recent block history on enwiki (only unblocked 5 days ago!) and generally hasn't demonstrated the need for rename. Praxidicae (talk) 13:10, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support I agree with JohnsonLee's opinion Ngochuong1328 (talk) 13:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- I am withdrawing my application. Thanks everyone-Shahadat Hossain (talk) 16:11, 18 May 2020 (UTC) [✖ withdrawn]
Global rename for JohnsonLee01
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: JohnsonLee01 (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 1 June 2020 06:26 UTC
Hi, I'm an vi-wikivoyage Administrators, Interface administrators and also contribute in others wiki project. There have no rename user. As a result, if someone wants to change the username (here), it is not possible to do so at the local level. The community trusted me to take over the adminship. I also try to contribute to other language projects including Wikipedia, Wikisource, Wikibooks, Wikiquote, Wiktionary, Wikispecies, Wikidata and Commons. – Le Duc Anh (💬|📝) 06:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support I am agree with JohnsonLee01 Xuanthucit (talk) 07:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support JohnsonLee01 is a very active user on viwiki, has extensive experience at anti-vandalism job and wikipedia's funtionalities, I believe he's reliable for renaming permisson. MeigyokuThmn (talk) 07:10, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose No experience in the area, plus temporary admin rights. Additionally history of this page raises some doubts, account came to wikivoyage for rename and create a local rename page while Vietnamese wiki already have username change venue. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:32, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- @1997kB: If in doubt me, you can check Phạm Gia Triết's account and my account? – Le Duc Anh (💬|📝) 12:10, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- @1997kB: Base on what you said, your supposition is not so unfounded. However, I can confirm that the User PTrietVN.HCMC, who requested to be renamed, has nothing to do with JohnsonLee01. I still don't know why PTrietVN.HCMC chose Wikivoyage instead of Wikipedia. As far as I know, efforts are currently being made to draw more attention to other smaller projects like Wikivoyage and I think that this is a good sign, not only for vi.Wikivoyage but for the whole Vietnamese community.--故人 talk 12:33, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- @A: The reason I highlighted this is because user requesting renamer right provided that request as an example that there is need. Even if I ignore that, which I did, user applied for renamer a day after the first request on project, too fast.. isn't it? Also there's already a renamer handling those requests, and I'd also love to have another native Vietnamese renamer but as I said this is just too fast. IMHO they should spend time on Vietnamese Wikipedia venue to know how process works and try later. Also normally because of less requests small wiki's like vi.voyage tends to defer requests to Global queue, because these wiki's normally have temporary admins and once they gets inactive, nobody will be there to manage such pages. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- @1997kB: Base on what you said, your supposition is not so unfounded. However, I can confirm that the User PTrietVN.HCMC, who requested to be renamed, has nothing to do with JohnsonLee01. I still don't know why PTrietVN.HCMC chose Wikivoyage instead of Wikipedia. As far as I know, efforts are currently being made to draw more attention to other smaller projects like Wikivoyage and I think that this is a good sign, not only for vi.Wikivoyage but for the whole Vietnamese community.--故人 talk 12:33, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- @1997kB: If in doubt me, you can check Phạm Gia Triết's account and my account? – Le Duc Anh (💬|📝) 12:10, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- strong oppose I'm sorry but a 40 day old account simply doesn't have the experience and established track record for me to support such a hefty global permission or any global permission. This request also demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding that it's a local right and not a global one. Praxidicae (talk) 13:07, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- I also want to add that I'm genuinely concerned at how quickly you've amassed major rights, including interface admin on a project you've been registered for only 37 days and only substantially editing four literally four days. Praxidicae (talk) 13:14, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
The user has asked to withdraw his request.--故人 talk 14:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Requests for global IP block exemption
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
2FA Tester for tmcarr
- Global user: tmcarr (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Would like to have this enabled on all of my accounts, this is one of the few that dont have it thanks, tmcarr141.155.148.225 19:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Please, log in and confirm this request. Ruslik (talk) 20:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- tmcarr, hello? --Base (talk) 05:26, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
2FA Tester for SecurityXP
- Global user: SecurityXP (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I would like to use 2FA to my account. Thanks, --SecurityXP (talk) 06:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Please advise if you have read the help document thoroughly. --Hamish 09:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have read the help document.--SecurityXP 09:38, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Requests for other global permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
Add abusefilter-helper for Supertoff
- Global user: Supertoff (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I would like to understand the actions of private global filters and be able to help users who report false positives about them on frwiki. I am a sysop and an abusefilter editor on frwiki.
Thanks, Supertoff (talk) 13:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Not ending before 16 May 2020 13:56 UTC
- Question: Hi Supertoff, I could have a question for you: Could you describe the next script?
action = "edit" & !("bot" in user_groups | "sysop" in user_groups | user_name in page_title) & page_namespace = 2
- Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 14:07, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- I suggested Supertoff to do this request and I support it, because he is one of the most active users on the false positive reports page. frwiki is one of the biggest wikis where global filters are enabled and we get more and more reports related to global filters these days. Orlodrim (talk) 14:12, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker. A test to see if I understand filters ? Ok (I already made some of french filters) : This script is to detect edit on "user's page" when done by user except bot, sysop and page owner. Right ? Supertoff (talk) 15:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support You're right. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support Long time Wikimedian, sysop on frwiki and works with edit filters. Use case is valid. ~riley (talk) 03:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support as this is a special use-case (frwiki is very large and impacted by these), requester has enough tenure to trust they won't go around inappropriately disclosing filter information from other projects. — xaosflux Talk 13:49, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support experienced abuse filter editor on frWP. Linedwell [talk] 07:50, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support -FASTILY 01:17, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support, trusted user, valid need. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:36, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Global interface editor for Matma Rex
- Global user: Matma Rex (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
My permissions expired, but I would still find them useful, for example to fix phab:T252421. Previously requested here: [3]. Matma Rex (talk) 21:20, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Not ending before 21:20, 16 May 2020 UTC
- Support while I do not see the right being heavily used, I still see more benefit in the user having them or not. --Base (talk) 05:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:36, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
See also
- User groups — Information on user groups
- Global rights log — Log of global permissions changes
- Archives
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation