Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Dr Brains (talk | contribs)
17 edits
Line 208: Line 208:
Please remove the administrator and bureaucrat permissions of the user not confirmed as administrator and bureaucrat in the vote according to the [[:cs:v:Wikiverzita:Pravidla pro správce a byrokraty|local administrator and bureaucrat policy]] --[[User:Mmh|Mmh]] ([[User talk:Mmh|talk]]) 14:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Please remove the administrator and bureaucrat permissions of the user not confirmed as administrator and bureaucrat in the vote according to the [[:cs:v:Wikiverzita:Pravidla pro správce a byrokraty|local administrator and bureaucrat policy]] --[[User:Mmh|Mmh]] ([[User talk:Mmh|talk]]) 14:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
:{{done}} Admin and bureaucrat permissions removed. [[User:SPQRobin|SPQRobin]] <small>([[User talk:SPQRobin|talk]])</small> 15:23, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
:{{done}} Admin and bureaucrat permissions removed. [[User:SPQRobin|SPQRobin]] <small>([[User talk:SPQRobin|talk]])</small> 15:23, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

==== User Dr Brains@fr.wikipedia ====
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|domain = fr.wikipedia
|user name = Dr Brains
|discussion= Please, remove me from the bureaucrat group. Thanks.
}}


=== Miscellaneous requests ===
=== Miscellaneous requests ===

Revision as of 15:56, 2 July 2015

Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

(translate | edit)

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== User name@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

See Administrator for information about this user group.

  • MediaWiki interface translations are done at translatewiki.net. Please do not request administrator access solely for that purpose; your request will be declined.
  • Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

Please start a new discussion about requesting the permission on the local village pump, administrators' noticeboard or a designated page for requesting permissions each time you request or renew adminship.

  • Discussions should be open for seven days. Please request adminship here seven days after discussions started. This page is not the place for any discussions or votes. (For wikis with few active users, it is OK to have no comments.)
  • If you only want adminship for specific tasks, please state for how long and for which tasks you need it. Otherwise stewards will decide whether to assign permanent adminship and the duration of adminship. See Steward requests/Permissions/Minimum voting requirements.

Mogoeilor@lrc.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

He has been temp admin since lrcwiki was in incubator, please give him temp admin right for three months, thank you. Mjbmr (discussion • contribs) 07:11, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In e-mail he asked me how to obtain adminship and I told him to please start a local request. --MF-W 10:07, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
He had created request for crat at lrc:ڤیکیپئدیا:چاست حوٙنە#دیڤوٙنسالاری کاریار موٙگوٙیی لۊر(Mogoeilor) but told them it's not possible to get a crat access for small wikis. I'm saying a wiki can't held without at least a local admin. Mjbmr (discussion • contribs) 01:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It would be correct to say that stewards will consider adminship at this time, and it would be temporary adminship, which would then follow the normal pattern of increasing terms to a year in length.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed I was also asked by him about bureaucratship, but told him to seek adminship first. Sigh. --MF-W 19:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

could I be a admin of luri lrc for one year? please so thankslrc lori (talk) 14:50, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

uchup19@su.wikt

Status:    Done

I've rebuilt this wiktionarie's "Tepas" about six months ago and now I want to fix some of the text interface which is less appropriate. --Uchup19 (talk) 06:54, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On hold until 30 June (1 week discussion minimum). --MF-W 10:49, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2015-10-01. Discussion open sufficient length of time without significant opposition To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 14:48, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sushilmishra@gomwiki

Status:    On hold

Hi gom.wikipedia is new and it needs initial import for modules and infobox i tried to create it but it caused a lot of error so i request for temperory adminship of max 30days only, so that basics of this wikipedia can be designed please consider this request and grant it at the earliest so that task can be finished...tnx... Sushilmishra (talk) 11:53, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On hold until 5 July (1 week), Could you please put a link to your request page at w:gom:चर्चा:मुखेल पान, so that people will see it. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 12:14, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
did it...actually i need to import infoboxes, templates and modules for which i need it temperorily, i have no intention to extend it beyond specified days...we are facing a problem there that when we are creating infoboxes then it is aligning to left instead of right but codes are all correct... example gom:Goem--Sushilmishra (talk) 08:32, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DerFussi@vi.wikivoyage

Status:    On hold

The wiki is almost abandoned and i would check it regularely and take care of it as long as needed. I am currently bureaucrat on Wikivoyage/de,it,en and admin on sv. -- DerFussi 04:59, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As your user page and voy:vi:Thảo luận Wikivoyage:Bảo quản viên are in english, how much vi do your speak actually? --Krd 09:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 On hold till 7 july--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 07:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pandukht@hy.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

--ԱշոտՏՆՂ (talk) 07:20, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Stewards see this. --Vadgt (talk) 08:03, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

See Bureaucrat for information about this user group.
  • In principle, requests for temporary bureaucrat access are not granted.
  • A small project does not need bureaucrats. Currently whether a promotion is valid or not is decided by stewards. See here for a guideline.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

CheckUser access

See CheckUser policy for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.
  • To request CheckUser information, see Steward requests/Checkuser. This is the place to request CheckUser access.
  • One-time CheckUser access is not permitted and temporary access is only used by Stewards or when the mandate of the CUs has an expiry date specified in local policies.

Aldnonymous@id.wikipedia

Status:    On hold

Already identified by foundation on Identification noticeboard. --AldNonymousBicara? 11:17, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't there a minimum time-span this vote needs to be open? Is the vote already closed? Savhñ 11:30, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well the rules was there, said "Calon dapat diangkat apabila "suara yang setuju" mencapai minimal 25 dan disetujui oleh minimal 70% dari "jumlah suara" translated : Candidates can be appointed if the "voice agree" to reach at least 25 and be approved by at least 70% of the "turnout", https://translate.google.com/#id/en/Calon%20dapat%20diangkat%20apabila%20%22suara%20yang%20setuju%22%20mencapai%20minimal%2025%20dan%20disetujui%20oleh%20minimal%2070%25%20dari%20%22jumlah%20suara%22. But I do agree if steward want to leave it open for another 2 days so it will be full 1 week.--AldNonymousBicara? 11:35, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I understood, from my reading of dates, it was opened on the 22nd. If it would need to remain open for a week (7 days), it should be open until the 29th, which is 4 days from today. I believe a week is a reasonable period of time, anything under that being too hasty. Please clear things up, and have it filed when the request is formally closed. Savhñ 11:40, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
True, I was just leaving this here because it's already got 25, but 1 week is a good standard practice.--AldNonymousBicara? 11:42, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
On hold. Request should be open for at least a week, per local guideline: "Pengangkatan melalui mekanisme pemungutan suara yang berlangsung minimal selama 1 minggu". Since it was opened the 22nd at 14:10 UTC, at this point it has been open for under 3 days. I would also recommend to wait for a non-involved user to close this vote, since the timeframe seems to indicate that there is a certain flexibility once the week has passed. Savhñ 12:33, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly I'm not comfortable at all with such a strong hastiness. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:32, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oversight access

See Oversight policy for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.
  • To request to have content oversighted, ask for a steward in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect and contact a steward privately. This section is for requesting access to the Oversight tool.
  • For contact details about oversighters across the wikis, refer to this page.
  • Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and temporary status is only used by Stewards .
  • When a new user is assigned to this group, please add them to this list.


Removal of access

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see previous discussion on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a separate list of these specific wikis.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy Admin activity review applies.
  • See the instructions above for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.

Old WMF staff accounts@testwiki, test2wiki

Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done

Similar to the previous request, this request is to remove adminship from unused staff accounts. Because several users have bureaucrat flag and crats can't remove other crats, The request is placed here. Checkuser and Oversight flags should also be removed.--GZWDer (talk) 08:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Jalexander-WMF, please verify they are all in fact not WMF'ers nowadays. Matanya (talk) 08:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed, they are also all locked. Jalexander--WMF 17:53, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All rights are now removed from these accounts. SPQRobin (talk) 22:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Place Clichy@wikidata

Status:    Done

Per policy: less than 5 admin actions in the last six months. --Stryn (talk) 14:47, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Please thank Place for his service. -- Avi (talk) 14:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User Danny B.@cs.wikiversity

Status:    Done

Please remove the administrator and bureaucrat permissions of the user not confirmed as administrator and bureaucrat in the vote according to the local administrator and bureaucrat policy --Mmh (talk) 14:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Admin and bureaucrat permissions removed. SPQRobin (talk) 15:23, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User Dr Brains@fr.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

Miscellaneous requests

See also

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions&oldid=12555330"