Stewards/Elections 2018/Votes/Faendalimas

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Faendalimas[edit]

ContentsYesNoNeutral
Faendalimas talk • contribs • accounts (stalktoy) • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility  — Translate: translation help, statement, template
  • Languages: en-N, pt-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Real Name Scott Thomson. Meta Userpage Faendalimas. Wikispecies user page Faendalimas. I have been active on Wikipedia EN and Wikispecies for over 10 years. On Wikispecies I am a Bureaucrat and a CheckUser. On Wikispecies I developed the CheckUser pages I also have managed the active versus inactive admins. This has resulted in my applying on several occasions to Meta for removal of privelages. I spend significant time mediating issues that come up and have also been involved in the Wikipedia Copywrite cleanup, OTRS etc. In the course of my adminstrative activities I have had to go to Stewards on a number of occasions. As a CheckUser I have already signed the confidentiality agreements.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2018/Questions#Faendalimas
Emblem-important.svg
If you have JavaScript enabled, you can easily vote with a Vote! button which will appear in the place of this notice. If you would prefer to add your vote manually, please add:
# {{Se-vote|2018|Your username|checked=|cb=}} <optional comments>. ~~~~
to the bottom of the appropriate Yes, No or Neutral section.

Pictogram voting support.svg Yes[edit]

  1. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Someone must be the first to vote Yes. :) Richardkiwi (talk) 20:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   ArdiPras95 (talk) 01:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Gereon K. (talk) 10:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   The result is obvious, but I'm voting 'yes' as a moral support. Actually I've just never seen the candidate. Wolverène (talk) 11:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. TomášPolonec (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TomášPolonec (talk) 13:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Mahveotm (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mahveotm (talk) 14:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Andyboorman (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   A foregone conclusion, but I would like to offer support in a developmental manner.. Andyboorman (talk) 10:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   FeralOink (talk) 10:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Great floors (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Great floors (talk) 20:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Thor Dockweiler (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Thor Dockweiler (talk) 03:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Wae35244 (talk) 09:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   İncelemeelemani (talk) 10:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Despite the uncertainty of his low contribution rate (which may have been very periodic and is not to visible non-admins) and some of his misunderstanding of a steward's role, I am voting yes because I think he can still contribute effectively. Stevenmitchell (talk) 13:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Bff (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Bff (talk) 14:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. ZLEA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ZLEA Talk\Contribs 15:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   HalanTul (talk) 21:40, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Ciao • Bestoernesto 22:41, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Düşünürəm ki, faydalı işlər görə biləcək. Uğurlar! ►Cekli829 06:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Filipović Zoran (talk) 15:31, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 12:02, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  22. Spasage (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Spasage (talk) 21:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. Litev (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Litev (talk) 12:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
    Eks-istifadəçi (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Moral support Eks-istifadəçi (talk) 13:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  24. Complainer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Complainer (talk) 16:51, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  25. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  26. Axpde (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   a×pdeHello! 06:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  27. M.Tarnowski (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   M.Tarnowski (talk) 12:46, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  28. Risk Engineer (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Risk Engineer (talk) 18:18, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  29. Orchi (Eligible, checked by Defender)2018   Orchi (talk) 22:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
    Enik (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Enik (talk) 06:05, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
    DAVID MAS V. (Not eligible, checked by Stïnger)   Mejor candidato para Steward TELETRECE (talk) 12:47, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
  30. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   NaBUru38 (talk) 01:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
  31. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Taivo (talk) 11:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose.svg No[edit]

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  Canvassing, no thanks, and it shows a severe lack of understanding of what being a steward is. 6,387 edits is also not that much (for perspective, he would have the lowest number of edits of any steward by around 4300 edits, and yes I was annoyed enough at the canvassing to figure that number out), Also the answer to MF-Warburg's question is wrong, stewards are not a global ArbCom. Rschen7754 14:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  --Stïnger (会話) 14:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC).
  3. KPFC (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   per his answers, which show a huge misunderstanding of steward work – KPFC💬 14:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018  I'm sorry, I know and I've seen the work he does as administrator, bureaucrat and checkuser in Wikispecies (and the truth is good), but I do not think he's even ready to be steward. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 14:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  --cyrfaw (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TonyBallioni (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   From his statement, I don't see why he is candidating for steward except that he has made some requests to stewards in the past. They are however of such nature that he couldn't execute them himself as a steward. Also, I am flabbergasted by the reply to my question in which he suggests that, faced with a conflict on a local wiki with wheelwarring admins, he would - instead of the first and only thing that might be possible, namely to emergency-desysop admins gone rogue - (ab)use his steward rights in order to send warnings and issue blocks to people based on special enwiki policies (e.g. the "3RR", 3-revert-rule, which is hardly known outsite of enwiki). Wanting to help to mediate in a conflict is nice and well, but coming along and imposing a whole process of bureaucracy on a community backed by steward tools is not. --MF-W 14:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Ferran Mir (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Vogone (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   The answer to the questions (especially to MF-Warburg's) makes it clear to me that the steward role has not been understood sufficiently. —Vogone (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Érico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Thank you for your volunteer work, but I don't think you have enough cross-wiki experience. Érico (talk) 15:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I would like to see more cross-wiki experience. Eurodyne (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Artix Kreiger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Among the other users comments, no cross-wiki experience --Artix Kreiger (Message Wall) 15:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Nick (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I'm afraid that they're not the capable and competent user they portray themselves to be. Their answers to questions and their canvassing would suggest more experience is needed in order to bring them up to the level of experience needed Stewards are expected to have. Nick (talk) 15:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   Herby talk thyme 15:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Not enough xwiki experience, administrative experience on 1 project - but with limited actions. — xaosflux Talk 16:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Steinsplitter (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Per MF-W, some key knowledge and experience is lacking here. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. L3X1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   enL3X1 ¡‹delayed reaction›¡ 17:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Per Nick --Cameron11598 (talk) 17:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  22. Kostas20142 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I will definitely assume good faith regarding the canvassing mentioned above. However I would like to see more cross-wiki participation, or at least something exceptional that will convince me to support before doing so. Don't let this discourage you, just thank you for your participation in Wikimedia so far! Kostas20142 (talk) 17:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Per above *Youngjin (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  24. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Milad A380 talk 20:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  25. Nihlus (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Nihlus 21:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  26. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   per above, sorry. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  27. Devraj poudel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Devraj poudel (talk) 02:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  28. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Az1568 (talk) 04:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  29. Krd (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018  --Krd 07:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  30. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Need more training for cross-wiki experiences. Eager Lin (Message) 08:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  31. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Legoktm (talk) 09:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  32. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   --Bukhari (Talk!) 10:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  33. DCB (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   his answers shows a huge misunderstanding of steward work DCB (talk) 11:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
    Alexanderps (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Alex Pereira falaê 13:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  34. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Jon Kolbert)2018   Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  35. Jon Kolbert (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  36. Holder (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Holder (talk) 15:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  37. Simplexity22 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Simplexity22 (talk) 20:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  38. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 01:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  39. Quickfingers (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Quickfingers (talk) 02:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  40. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 10:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  41. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   —Ah3kal (talk) 13:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  42. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   No crosswiki experience. –Davey2010Talk 15:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  43. Donald Trung (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   out of principle I can’t support the expansion of the Stewardry until (1) there exists a council for global ban/lock (non-WMF bans) appeals made up of users who are not sitting-stewards, or a global UTRS system to address global locks and bans as the current stewards clearly don't want discussions from globally banned/blocked users to stand, (2) stewards actually start following policy like “If they create new accounts and are not disruptive with those accounts, they will not be locked again merely because it is discovered that they were previously globally locked.”, and (3) when there’s a clear policy when global locks can be used for non-vandalism only accounts (e.g. Registered for shorter a month, having less than 500 edits, Etc.) as plenty of potentially constructive users with one bad day are locked out of their accounts and many will never return while actual trolls don't really care about such measures (the Nipponese dog, the Incorrible Troll, Etc.) Also this user has around half of the number of edits I have. Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (Articles 📚) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) 19:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  44. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   DENAMAX (talk) 20:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  45. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Rzuwig 22:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  46. MarioFinale (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ~ℳɑrio (talk) 07:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  47. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   No need for steward access stated, and canvassing is a no-no. Just because a wiki has no member of their community as steward does not itself support a candidacy for steward access. Jasper Deng (talk) 09:11, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  48. Eddie891 (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018   Eddie891 (talk) 13:05, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  49. Base (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Very limited scope experience. Wikispecies is a very isolated and unique project, while on other wikis user is no prominent contributor. --Base (talk) 13:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Base (talk) 13:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  50. BugWarp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   BugWarp (talk) 13:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  51. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   MZaplotnik(talk) 15:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  52. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Buggia 09:55, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  53. Potatornado (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Low edits, less experience Potatornado (talk) 15:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  54. Freddy2001 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Freddy2001 talk 16:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  55. NickK (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Per Rschen7754 — NickK (talk) 17:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  56. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   StevenJ81 (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  57. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ExtremPilotHD (talk) 19:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  58. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   ~Cybularny Speak? 22:20, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  59. Hrodvarsson (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:27, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  60. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Slowking4 (talk) 13:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  61. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Defender)2018   Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  62. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Inept candidate, mediocre answers, unethical canvassing. But above all that, the candidate appears to misunderstand Stewards work in totality. –Ammarpad (talk) 13:15, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  63. Storkk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Storkk (talk) 13:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  64. Ibrahim.ID (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   No crosswiki experience and your contributions in your project is too small (~3k only)! Ibrahim.ID 14:13, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  65. De728631 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   De728631 (talk) 20:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  66. OJJ (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   ↑ --OJJ (talk) 15:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  67. Frīheidasliova (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Frīheidasliova (talk) 08:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  68. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Statement to short. And per above. Jules78120 (talk) 13:26, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  69. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   -Xbony2 (talk) 14:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  70. Allforrous (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Allforrous (talk) 22:19, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
    Weslam123 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Weslam123 (talk) 06:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
  71. CreativeC (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   CreativeC (talk) 09:35, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
  72. KlaasZ4usV (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Klaas `Z4␟` V:  09:02, 19 February 2018 (UTC) 'nuff said by above colleagues
  73. Smile4ever (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Smile4ever (talk) 20:10, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
  74. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   not enough experience. Lepricavark (talk) 13:58, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
  75. Barras (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   -Barras talk 18:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
  76. Touzrimounir (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mounir Touzri (talk) 20:44, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
  77. Mélencron (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   Mélencron (talk) 02:49, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral[edit]

  1. Wischmat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Wischmat (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Definitely a trusted user; low number of cross-wiki edits concerns me. hiàn 22:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
    Openskye (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Openskye (talk) 23:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 13:53, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Elvesham (talk) 22:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Alzinous (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Alzinous (talk) 12:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   B20180 (talk) 14:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. స్వరలాసిక (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   స్వరలాసిక (talk) 00:31, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 09:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Yodin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Seems trustworthy, but concerned by his "interventionist" approach to MFW's question. --YodinT 21:20, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   GZWDer (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. 1233 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 02:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Power~enwiki (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   power~enwiki (talk) 03:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   per both sides. Garam (talk) 08:51, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Liridon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Liridon (talk) 12:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Anbans 585 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Anbans 585 (talk) 18:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. Zabia (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Zabia (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Ankry (talk) 10:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Stephan1000000 (talk) 19:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Vachovec1 (talk) 02:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. Cyberpower678 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mostly per the opposers, I am sitting here. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 18:22, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   DePlusJean (talk) 00:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
  22. Hma969 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Hma969 (talk) 10:19, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
    Karora (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Karora (talk) 11:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. JB82 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   JB82 (talk) 01:37, 20 February 2018 (UTC)