Jump to content

Stewards/Confirm/2012/zh-hans

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards‎ | Confirm‎ | 2012
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.
中文(简体):

2012-13年监管员确认程序将于2月8日开始,2月27日结束。

2012-13年监管员确认程序可供社群确认对目前的监管员是否满意。为了使程序尽量流畅,以下为确认程序的组织方式。

在2012年2月1日前在任意wiki上作出过编辑的用户可以登入后作出评论。在2012年选举期内,对以下列出的监管员,您可以对任何一位或几位指出您对他们的监管员工作是否满意,并说明原因。例如,您可以依据监管员方针,将不活跃作为原因列出。不活跃的监管员将会失去权限。

在本次选举结束后,在任的及新上任的监管员将考虑本页上的投诉,结合社群的意见以及他们对工作的理解和看法,决定是否移除一些监管员。所有2011年2月以前上任的监管员将需要经过确认程序。2011年10月上任的监管员由于尚未完成一整年的工作,因此不强制参与本次确认程序,而2013年必须参与确认。

参见:


Purge the cache of this page?


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

中文(简体):
  • 可说语言: de-3, en-4, fr-2, nl
  • 个人资料: 我显然不是最活跃的监管员,不过有时候我还是会碰到Edgar的傀儡等需要使用监管员权限的情形。从2012年起我是基金会的合同工(数据分析)。

Comments about Andre Engels[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

中文(简体):
  • 可说语言: en, he-2
  • 个人资料: 很高兴看到去年我们有一大批来自各个计划的朋友加入监管员团队,我希望这个趋势可以保持下去,但同时也觉得我有能力在接下来的一年里作为监管员服务更广大的社群。我在监管员的各项工作中较活跃,主要的重心侧重于用户查核。你可以通过IRC、元维基或电子邮件联系我,我会回复。感谢各位过去对我的支持,希望未来我可以继续赢得各位的支持与信任。

Comments about Avraham[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

中文(简体):
  • 可说语言: de, en-4
  • 个人资料: 我一年前上任,所以这是我的首次确认程序。我觉得在过去的一年中我相当活跃,如处理跨站删除与封禁(参见我的全域管理员统计)。我同时也处理破坏、广告并锁定封禁了许多的账户与IP。我同时还作出了很多权限更改,主要是对我自己的账户进行的,以防止进一步破坏,并删除违反方针的内容。不过我也更改了许多其他人的权限。我通常在各处有需要我的地方帮忙,不论是IRC还是在wiki上。如果你有任何问题,请向我提问。

Comments about Barras[edit]



logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Simplified Chinese not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: Hello. This is my first steward confirmation as well. I have been fairly active in my role as steward (links: steward activity, Meta logs) by doing anti-vandalism/antispam actions such as global locks and global IP blocks. I regularly communicate on IRC responding to requests related to crosswiki vandalism (in the stewards channel). I hope that I can continue working with the current stewards and helping out.

Comments about Bsadowski1[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Simplified Chinese not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: fr, en-3
  • Personal info: My general statement isn't that different from last year's : as a steward, I sometimes make a few mistakes but I think I'm not doing a bad work overall.
    For those not aquainted to me yet:
    • My home wiki is frwiki, the french Wikipedia. I arrived in nov. 2004 and became a sysop there in march 2005. I also worked there as a bureaucrat for 3 years (jun 2006 - sep. 2009) but gave up the bit so I could spend more time on other things.
    • I manage a bot named Loveless (see [2] and [3])
    • I became steward at end of 2006. I don't really do steward requests on wiki but rather use my availability time to take care of the emergency people tells us of on IRC (#wikimedia-stewards). My public steward activities (everything but Oversight and Checkuser) are viewable on this page ; those local to meta (like right changes) on this one.

Comments about Darkoneko[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Simplified Chinese not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: de, en-3, grc-3, la-2, es-1
  • Personal info: Still being one of the most active stewards, I could not have been as active as in the last years. On my part, that's mainly caused by a lot of stress at the university and in my real life. I also decided to organize the very successful conference Wikipedia trifft Altertum, worked a bit more on my now featured article de:Laokoon, became a member of the community project budget of Wikimedia Germany and later also a member of the Board. But the main reason because I couldn't be as active as before are my wonderful fellows who did so many useful things more efficiently than I could do in my scarce free time. I'm proud that I could organize the 2011-2 election where we found more helpful fellows who still ask me, as an experienced steward, several times for help. Thank you, my fellows! I'd be happy to serve the community with my experience and free time for the next term, thanks.

Comments about DerHexer[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Simplified Chinese not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: sr, en-3, hr-3, bs-3, de-1
  • Personal info: Hi there. I've been a steward since December 2007, so I've got a lot of experience. Now, I know I haven't been using the tools that much lately, but that is mostly because I've had a shift in my life: I'm moved to the capital, got a job and changed my life completely, so I had little time left for much else. Once I fully adapt, I hope I'll be able to enhance my activity as a steward. I had long thoughts about whether I should quit or not, but several wiki-friends dissuaded me. I'll be thankful if I'm given another term to humbly serve Wikimedia and its projects. Thanks.

Comments about Dungodung[edit]

(UTC)

  • Keep Keep -- Alanscottwalker (talk) 02:14, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 23:44, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep. Courcelles (talk) 00:51, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Dungo is a very kind and helpful person, even with those who were not so kind with him in the past. Always careful and with lot of selfcontrol. In situations of great tension, he always stayed calm and objective. He is young, but many older people can learn a lot from him. Strong support. --Maduixa (talk) 09:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose Regardless of such an opening above, I also have experienced a totally opposite approach of Dungodung. We did not have had much conversation for some time and one could say he might have changed in the meantime, of which I would not be as certain as someone who occasionally sees his comments on sr.wiki. I do not expect this vote to have much impact on the confirmation outcome, but I also would make remark that if the voting outcome was all that matters, we would never advance and become better wikipedians. I intended my vote to be warning that certain improvements can be made in the approach, which can be initiated either by the environment, or by the candidate himself. When I notice such improvements, my vote will change. 本 Mihajlo [ talk ] 07:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    I honestly don't know what you're talking about. Can you outline briefly what problems you have noticed in my behaviour/wikiing? You say "improvements", but how can I improve if I don't know what it is that needs improvement. Thanks --FiliP ██ 07:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    For quite some time yet there is a trend that addresses not only the necessity of a fine work that can be measured through the protocolar and other logs on Wikimedia servers, but also makes more demands on existence of strong ethical norms built within a person that has taken the role and acts as a steward not only on the projects but also on other occasions that are of importance for presenting the community under a steward's hood. I would remind the whole auditorium that I only supported Dungodung before 2007 2011, so it would be safe to assume he did a few very wrong moves in the meantime to earn such a vote. I must make remark that, in my very belief, his personality has changed in the way I would take the liberty of finding ethically dislikable. Reading this, I do not really feel encouraged to post here about the things that would be helpful in making my point. Although it does not really surprise me Dungodung *does not remember* what he did wrong when presenting himself as a Steward -- of course, here he can deny every mistake that is not really linkable, and I am not about to give him that joy -- I would assume good faith and offer him simple live talk. There is a whole year till the next vote.本 Mihajlo [ talk ] 22:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, I understand that you have unresolved personal issues with Dungodung, and you voted the way you voted. But why you called a blocked sockpuppeter and his friends to come here to support you?Isn't that pathetic?--Wikit 19:39, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    I am really displeased there are assumptions tending to reduce my partake in this vote to some low personal level, totally diminishing the need to assume I am acting in best faith -- for which I gave enough space to the best of my belief. As such, those assumptions speak rather of the ones who made them. But this comment above has gone even further to the level I shall classify as irrational shooting in the dark. Oh, I am getting it! The sockpuppeter guy below insults the whole lot of people and then I am the one to be addressed back by the ones who do not only fantasize I called him here, but also are trying to insult me back. I am just not getting how could *I* be called *pathetic* then. :D To elaborate: Thank you for the comment; it tells me how you are thinking and what you are probably doing on the sr.wiki project. 本 Mihajlo [ talk ] 08:11, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Како то тврдиш да су дошли по позиву само они који нису изразили сагласност, а ти си дошао спонтано? Зар није доказан супротан пример да су позивани гласачи и са друге википедије? Та „технологија” ти је много блиска. Ово смо гласање пресликали на излед гласања на ср вики и то захваљујући оваквој необјективности.--Sahara (talk) 20:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose --Bas-Celik (talk) 05:47, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose --Sahara (talk) 07:29, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose --SmirnofLeary (talk) 22:54, 24 February 2012 (UTC) Insufficiently involved in disputes between users on project of Wikipedia in Serbian language. My voice against because once he sided with one group of users, and another group called „hyper-nationalists“. I think this is inappropriate behavior of one administrator.[reply]
  • Keep Keep Strong support.--Павлица talk 14:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose Zašto mislim da Dungodung ne zaslužuje mesto stjuarda: - Nezaineresovan je za poboljšanje, dalji razvoj i unapređenje sr.Wikipedije, - krši Wiki pravila u cilju održavanja statusa kvo, - nekorektan je: priča jedno, radi drugo a misli treće, - zloupotrebljava ovlašćenja. Sve u svemu vreme mu je za abdikaciju.--Dusanbasic (talk) 19:22, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Heh, lies said by a user currently blocked on srwiki. --FiliP ██ 19:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • I could agree with the word 'untrue', but 'lie' sounds too hard. Not only too hard, but it also might be incorrect, in case that the user believes all those allegations are true. Further diplomacy would lead us to the state of weak shock: 'I really do believe those allegations are untrue, and caused by the block you have on sr.wiki. I did not block you, so I would feel so free to assume you might be wanting to further damage sr.wiki by this vote and nothing more. Thanks.' 本 Mihajlo [ talk ] 18:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • To što je Dusanbasic blokiran je tvoja sramota, istorijat je malo duži. Tvoja prethodna rečenica je jeftin način za diskreditovanje neistomišljenika. Ti i tvoja kamarila dovodite do ratnog stanja na sr. wikipediji. Na sve pozitivne predloge idete đonom a ovde se vajkaš da nema predloga. Ovde vidim ima reizbora, zašto se kod kuće ne založiš za to, nego pravite nedodirljive, a pokušaje uvođenja reizbora blokirate. Pravite od Sr. Wikipedije cirkus. Zar ti glavnu reč i politiku na sr. wikipediji vodi "žena u crnom". Odgovori mi samo na jedno pitanje ako sve ovo ne znaš zašto ne znaš, a ako znaš zašto to činite.--Dusanbasic (talk) 07:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • It would be nice if you can explain what this has to do with his use of the steward tools, because this is not the place to discuss sr.wp problems as Dungodung doesn't act as a steward on that project. mickit 16:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Kad je čovek čestit on svaki posao može čestito da uradi, ako nije onda nastaju problemi. Ovo o čemu pišem, je moralna kategorija što verovatni ni ti, ni on, ni Bokica ne možete da shvatite jer vam to nije blisko. Svoju blokadu strpljivo podnosim pa kad se to završi sve vaše marifetluke ću izneti u javnost ako vas u međuvremenu čestiti korisnici ne počiste ili se sami međusobno ne "pojedete".--Dusanbasic (talk) 17:08, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep -- Hoo man (talk) 22:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Béria Lima msg 23:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Ceradon (talk) 00:00, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Simplified Chinese not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: de, en-4, fr-3
  • Personal info: Hello, there. This is my first re-confirmation as a steward, as I was only elected last year. As to my actions, I haven't been quite as active as I would have liked, but nevertheless got together a few steward actions. One of the first actions I did was nudging the people from Portuguese Wikipedia to elect their own bureaucrats, as a project of their size ought to have some. My professional situation has changed recently, which should give me more time to devote to stewardry on Wikipedia. I still believe that as a steward I can be of help to the many small wikis out there.

Comments about Eptalon[edit]

Trijnstel, could you explain why you consider both of these cases to have been emergencies? The dewiki community did not share this judgement. Also the criticism wasn't so much that Eptalon did something that local Checkusers would have done as well, but the clueless way in which he/she tried to reign in in a very complex and high profile case whose eventual completion triggered wide media coverage in German media for weeks and months (this section alone lists 20 press articles).
And yes, we are all human and mistakes happen, but what is important is an ability to learn from them. Contrast this case, where I was happy to vote "support".
I don't question Eptalon's good intentions, but one of the most powerful user rights in Wikimedia projects should not be handed out based on AGF alone. There is a myriad of other ways to contribute which do not require the same level of diligence. Regards, HaeB 22:22, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]



logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Simplified Chinese not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: I am very sorry for creating my statement late. I have just returned from active duty with the British Army and have had zero access to the Internet for long periods over the last few months. I am hereby confirming that I am asking for reconfirmation as a steward for another year. I am a strong crosswiki abuse monitor and have many blocks/locks and other protection actions. I have also served the community by doing other steward actions including many checkuser actions. I have also had the opportunity to stand up for members of the community over the past year when incorrect or rash action has been taken against them. I am not liable to be called back to active duty at all over the next 365 days so I will be as active as I used to be. :) Thanks for partaking and understanding!

Comments about Fr33kman[edit]