- 1 Press release
- 2 Lets get in contact
- 3 Can you give me an explanation
- 4 Sysop rights
- 5 October admin confirmations
- 6 Admin confirmations
- 7 wikimania 2012!
- 8 stats on videos
- 9 Wikimedia genealogy project
- 10 Your account will be renamed
- 11 Please fill out our Inspire campaign survey
- 12 Did you ever attend Wikimania with your money? Talk to us!
- 13 What future IdeaLab campaigns would you like to see?
- 14 Future IdeaLab Campaigns results
- 15 Re: WikipediaWeekly Facebook group
- 16 Thanks
- 17 Open Call for Individual Engagement Grants
- 18 Survey on content curation & review Inspire Campaign
- 19 Account vs. IP vandalism
- 20 Request for feedback about naming
- 21 GLAM Banners signoff
- 22 Advice for a grant proposal
- 23 Email(s)
Editing on the meta version of the press release has effectively stopped. Please be advised that we may be distributing the non-English press releases as early as Monday 29 September. The English version will be distributed the week after in order to smooth out the load on our servers. --maveric149 22 Sep 2003
Lets get in contact
Can you give me an explanation
Of why you erased the jury page? The jury has been decided and I have seen nowhere an email from you saying why you would do such a thing. Thank you for keeping me posted asap. notafish }<';> 13:00, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Per this request, consensus was reached and you are now a sysop. Congrats! Please be familiar with our policies before using your new tools, and please also add yourself to the sysop box. Thank you. Majorly (talk) 00:10, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
October admin confirmations
Just to let you know that, per Meta:Admin#Poll after a year, your local rights on meta are up for their annual reconfirmation at Meta:Administrators/confirm. WJBscribe (talk) 21:56, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Yes to coordinating related talks if possible.
Yes to judging, but not too complex, for the awards! Still thinking about categories and nomination process.
stats on videos
Hi, I was browsing the etherpad of the multimedia round table, and I saw you wanted more stats on videos. Currently we do have stats for how many video files are on commons at commons:Special:TimedMediaHandler (There should be audio stats added to that soon). There's also commons:Commons:MIME type statistics, which break down ogg files between audio and video. However those are total number of files, not currently used files. I did some quick stats just now - Taking just the files on commons, currently there are 12,795 (out of 39,215, or 32.6%) videos being used, and 227,820 (out of 296,898 or 76.7%) audio files are used. Here midi files are considered part of audio files, and usage is considered the file being embedded somewhere on a wikimedia wiki (directly linking to the file page is not counted). Bawolff (talk) 21:17, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
03:45, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Please fill out our Inspire campaign survey
Thank you for participating in the Wikimedia Inspire campaign during March 2015!
Please take our short survey and share your experience during the campaign.
Did you ever attend Wikimania with your money? Talk to us!
TL;DR: Fill a short Wikimania survey, it takes 5 min.
Hi, I'm writing you because you are listed in Wikimania/Frequent attendees. As you probably know by now, Wikimania 2016 Esino Lario wants to achieve a Wikimania format which allows people to "get things done" and leave the conference fully satisfied with the result of their investment of time and other resources (see pillars 2 and 4: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2016_bids/Esino_Lario/Pillars ). For this purpose, we consider all audiences (see https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2016_bids/Esino_Lario/Program#Target ).
Participants other than scholarship recipients and reimbursed representatives are one group we heard very little from, but we think they are important because: 1) they have financial resources and help make the Wikimania budget sustainable; 2) they have motivation to share and ideas on what makes Wikimania valuable.
We set up a form mainly to collect names of some such people and talk with them later: if you provide your contact, we may write you on this topic. We may release aggregate data from the resposes; data will be handled by us and the Wikimania 2016 fiscal sponsor "Ecomuseo delle Grigne" (under EU law). Please fill the whole form, it's short!
Feel free to forward this invite to anyone.
Federico Leva and Martin Rulsch
Wikimania 2016 team, scholarships subteam
08:30, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
What future IdeaLab campaigns would you like to see?
I’m Jethro, and I’m seeking your help in deciding topics for new IdeaLab campaigns that could be run starting next year. These campaigns aim to bring in proposals and solutions from communities that address a need or problem in Wikimedia projects. I'm interested in hearing your preferences and ideas for campaign topics!
Here’s how to participate:
- Learn more about this consultation
- Vote on and submit new campaign topics in the AllOurIdeas Survey
- Discuss campaign topics and ask questions on the IdeaLab talk page
Future IdeaLab Campaigns results
Last December, I invited you to help determine future ideaLab campaigns by submitting and voting on different possible topics. I'm happy to announce the results of your participation, and encourage you to review them and our next steps for implementing those campaigns this year. Thank you to everyone who volunteered time to participate and submit ideas.
With great thanks,
FYI, I've just spent the last 80 minutes reading (and commenting outside Facebook) the entire last month of the WikipediaWeekly group, and I found it much more noisy than Wikimedia-l (and blogs, and wiki talk pages). I found perhaps 1-2 gossip items not entirely available elsewhere, other than that no takeaways. Anyway, I'm glad it's useful for whoever it's useful for. :) Nemo 21:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Indeed there are certain threads that read much more like a chatroom than a discussion. But I contend there are voices and conversations I see there that you do not on Wikimedia-L. And key voices say things they haven't in other places. Wondering if you stumbled upon this revelation about the launch of VE which I have never seen anywhere else. .
Erik Möller For the record, the desire to "hit the deadline" for the VisualEditor release extended beyond any grant agreement. (If that had been all there was to it, I would have pushed back.) The Board independently had repeatedly pushed to meet the arbitrary schedule, and even the team itself was motivated at the time to finally go in front of a larger audience, as I think James would attest. The project had already been delayed repeatedly; there was even impatience in parts of the community and the press.
So there was a general, shared feeling that we needed to do better. I take responsibility for not putting on the brakes; it was due to my own lack of experience and focus at the time.
My takeaway is that we simply didn't yet have mature processes in place for a release of this scope and complexity. For instance, even the community liaison support was conceived at the last minute. We made a lot of changes in the years that followed, some under Sue (e.g., addition of a "Beta Features" program, improved testing infrastructure, QA support), some under Lila (focus on performance & analytics), some after I left. I'm sure in some respects there's still lots of room for improvement in engineering processes.
I agree with Ori's point on the list, however, that most of this continuous improvement has been going on in spite of, not because of, what's been happening at the top. That's in many ways how it should be -- WMF's engineering organization has the capacity for independent self-improvement in all areas. But of course the drama that's going on right now is entirely avoidable and depressing, and if it continues, will damage existing capabilities and lead to regressions in important areas as key people leave.
I don't have regrets about leaving -- I was going to stick around for another 1-2 years at most; I was never cut out to be a lifer, and I left voluntarily because it was clear things were going to just continue to deteriorate at the top. But if some of the key folks in engineering left, that would really really suck. You don't want that to happen, trust me. These are good, super-talented people, and the institutional/technical memory that would leave with them would set the org back severely.
For your helpful comment on the Native American outreach proposal, I was happy to see the collaboration with the museum of the American Indian. My idea was exactly to a wikibus or RV, to take it on the road during summers to carry out workshops and information sessions at tribal museums and libraries. If you are interested I can send you my forthcoming article, in which I argue that Wikipedia sorely needs representation from Native Americans and from anthropologists who know their way around the literature about Native American peoples and other indigenous groups. --Maunus (talk) 13:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Open Call for Individual Engagement Grants
Greetings! The Individual Engagement Grants (IEG) program is accepting proposals until April 12th to fund new tools, research, outreach efforts, and other experiments that enhance the work of Wikimedia volunteers. Whether you need a small or large amount of funds (up to $30,000 USD), IEGs can support you and your team’s project development time in addition to project expenses such as materials, travel, and rental space.
- Submit a grant request or draft your proposal in IdeaLab
- Get help with your proposal in an upcoming Hangout session
- Learn from examples of completed Individual Engagement Grants
Thanks for your participation in IdeaLab during the Inspire Campaign focused on improving content curation & review processes from February to March 2016. I'm interested in hearing your feedback about your participation during campaign, so if you're able, I invite you to complete this brief survey to describe how you contributed to the campaign and how you felt about participating.
Immediate results of the campaign can be found here. Please feel free to review them and let me know if you have any questions about the campaign or the survey. Thanks! I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 02:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Account vs. IP vandalism
Hello. You just posted a link at "Force people to log in" that interests me. I am not sure if this post belongs here or on that Discussion page. This Account vs. IP vandalism stuff comes up regularly, but I haven't seen any numbers. The link shows what they are going to talk about, but not any results than I could find. Do you have any idea where some results can be found? Thank you either way. Sammy D III (talk) 17:13, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Sammy D III:} - Good point. I've added a link to the video to the page - Grants:IdeaLab/Force_people_to_log_in_when_they_edit#See_also -- Fuzheado (talk) 03:40, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Request for feedback about naming
Does this design for the US Wikimedians naming !vote look okay to you? Talk:Wikimedia United States Coalition#Formal name and logo for the US coalition --Pine✉ 23:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
GLAM Banners signoff
Hi Andrews, Is there any possibility that you can update Grants talk:Project/Rapid/GLAM Banners for Philadelphia, PA so that we can get this wrapped up before the fiscal year rolls over? It would be much appreciated, Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 14:39, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Advice for a grant proposal
Hi Fuzheado, I have made a new grant proposal draft related to the previous one about the academic reviewers. Your comments and suggestions will be appreciated. --Maunus (talk) 13:02, 23 May 2017 (UTC)