Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
Ludo29 (talk | contribs)
Line 198: Line 198:


: FTR, just as in the previous case ([[Special:Diff/12195657]]), there was no formal discussion (or, rather, no vote) of revoking my permissions on the project. Thus, I suggest that [[User:Oleg3280 |Oleg3280]] starts one first (perhaps by just adding the usual “support”, “oppose”, “abstain”, “comments” subsections to the discussion just started [[b:ru:Special:Diff/121465]]?), while this request is put on hold until the vote is over. Thanks in advance. — [[User:Ivan Shmakov|Ivan Shmakov]] ([[User talk:Ivan Shmakov|d]] ▞ [[Special:Contributions/Ivan Shmakov|c]]) 19:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
: FTR, just as in the previous case ([[Special:Diff/12195657]]), there was no formal discussion (or, rather, no vote) of revoking my permissions on the project. Thus, I suggest that [[User:Oleg3280 |Oleg3280]] starts one first (perhaps by just adding the usual “support”, “oppose”, “abstain”, “comments” subsections to the discussion just started [[b:ru:Special:Diff/121465]]?), while this request is put on hold until the vote is over. Thanks in advance. — [[User:Ivan Shmakov|Ivan Shmakov]] ([[User talk:Ivan Shmakov|d]] ▞ [[Special:Contributions/Ivan Shmakov|c]]) 19:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

==== User:Ludo29 ====
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|domain = fr.wikipedia.org and commons.wikimedia.org
|user name = Ludo29
|discussion= Please remove my sysop rights on fr.wikipedia.org and commons.wikimedia.org and my OS rights on fr.wikipedia.org
}}
[[User:Ludo29|Ludo29]] ([[User talk:Ludo29|talk]]) 12:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


=== Miscellaneous requests ===
=== Miscellaneous requests ===

Revision as of 12:25, 11 September 2015

Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== User name@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

See Administrator for information about this user group.

  • MediaWiki interface translations are done at translatewiki.net. Please do not request administrator access solely for that purpose; your request will be declined.

  • Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

Please start a new discussion about requesting the permission on the local village pump, administrators' noticeboard or a designated page for requesting permissions each time you request or renew adminship.

  • Discussions should be open for seven days. Please request adminship here seven days after discussions started. This page is not the place for any discussions or votes. (For wikis with few active users, it is OK to have no comments.)
  • If you only want adminship for specific tasks, please state for how long and for which tasks you need it. Otherwise stewards will decide whether to assign permanent adminship and the duration of adminship. See Steward requests/Permissions/Minimum voting requirements.

محمد مجیب@sd.wikipedia

Sysop forever --محمد مجیب (talk) 01:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On hold until 11 Sept to give a week of discussion. Ajraddatz (talk) 01:25, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I was also admin on Sindhi Wikipedia 2 time before this discussion. (first from December 2014 to February 2015) (2nd February 2015 to Auguest 2015) now please make me admin forever--محمد مجیب (talk) 03:17, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aliwal2012@nso.wikipedia

On hold until 16 September (minimum 1 week for discussion). --MF-W 01:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

See Bureaucrat for information about this user group.
  • In principle, requests for temporary bureaucrat access are not granted.
  • A small project does not need bureaucrats. Currently whether a promotion is valid or not is decided by stewards. See here for a guideline.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

CheckUser access

See CheckUser policy for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.
  • To request CheckUser information, see Steward requests/Checkuser. This is the place to request CheckUser access.
  • One-time CheckUser access is not permitted and temporary access is only used by Stewards or when the mandate of the CUs has an expiry date specified in local policies.


Oversight access

See Oversight policy for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.
  • To request to have content oversighted, ask for a steward in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect and contact a steward privately. This section is for requesting access to the Oversight tool.
  • For contact details about oversighters across the wikis, refer to this page.
  • Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and temporary status is only used by Stewards .

  • When a new user is assigned to this group, please add them to this list.

Removal of access

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see previous discussion on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a separate list of these specific wikis.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy Admin activity review applies.
  • See the instructions above for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.

TnoXX@ukwiki

I would like to have my current status revoked. Thank you!--TnoXX (talk) 11:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold for a day per standard practice--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 11:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Stryn (talk) 17:22, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Electric_goat@jawiktionary

I have been inactive, and I cannot contribute for awhile. So please remove my rights of b'crat and sysop. Thank you, e-Goat (talk) 03:25, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold for 1 day per standard practice. --Stryn (talk) 07:13, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Stryn (talk) 05:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kaare@global

Tracked in Phabricator:
Task T111847

Per Global renamers#Removal_of_access. Right not used for +1 year. Steinsplitter (talk) 12:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —MarcoAurelio 17:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I used my access back in March of this year when there was some sort of big event involving user account renaming. Since then it's been difficult for me to find accounts to rename, especially since I wanted to focus on Danish ones. - Kaare (talk) 17:52, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your global rename log shows 0 renames since you were given access. Best regards. —MarcoAurelio 17:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Then the log is incomplete. On dawiki I see four of my renames (but there were many more). - Kaare (talk) 18:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You used the local Special:RenameUser page (but this page should be disabled by default)? If yes, then they are local but not global renames. Best --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:20, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I also did a bunch of renames on elwiki as witnessed by my contributions there (resulting page moves). In inclusion, don't trust the global rename log, at least not for entries from back then. - Kaare (talk) 18:21, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed: Special:GlobalRenameQueue/request/3902/view. I think that they won't be seen in the logs because they didn't have an account on Meta, would it be? --Stryn (talk) 18:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Global rename log will be created even if there is no account on meta. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:34, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, that would not matter. The global rename log should be triggered, and we've now discovered a pretty serious bug where, or things were not logged, or if logged they've dissapeared. Sorry Kaare, I'm regranting you the rights and reporting this straight to Phabricator. Will do a review for all accounts below too. —MarcoAurelio 18:36, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Marco. If anyone still want proof of my participation this year, check the mailing list or even IRC backlogs. - Kaare (talk) 18:40, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For all those interested I've reported this issue at phab:T111847. —MarcoAurelio 18:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kingturtle@global

Per Global renamers#Removal_of_access. Right not used for +1 year. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —MarcoAurelio 17:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deskana@global

Per Global renamers#Removal_of_access. Right not used for +1 year. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —MarcoAurelio 17:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mskyrider@global

Per Global renamers#Removal_of_access. Right not used for +1 year. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —MarcoAurelio 17:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Praveenp@global

Per Global renamers#Removal_of_access. Right not used for +1 year. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —MarcoAurelio 17:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Djsasso@global

Per Global renamers#Removal_of_access. Right not used for +1 year. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —MarcoAurelio 17:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Penn Station@global

Per Global renamers#Removal_of_access. Right not used for +1 year. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —MarcoAurelio 17:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have reverted all rights removal pending investigation of phab:T111847. —MarcoAurelio 18:57, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User Dbenzhuser@dewiki

Please remove my sysop status. I have not found the time for any relevant contribution, and that isn't likely to change in the foreseeable future. Dbenzhuser (talk) 16:55, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Shmakov@ruwikibooks

See latest discussions on Common Forum and user talks. 188.32.107.101@ru.wikibooks. Oleg3280 (talk) 19:25, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "Common Forum"? Also, the checkuser request you linked to was not yet carried out. --MF-W 19:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Common Forum, user talks. Oleg3280 (talk) 19:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
FTR, just as in the previous case (Special:Diff/12195657), there was no formal discussion (or, rather, no vote) of revoking my permissions on the project. Thus, I suggest that Oleg3280 starts one first (perhaps by just adding the usual “support”, “oppose”, “abstain”, “comments” subsections to the discussion just started b:ru:Special:Diff/121465?), while this request is put on hold until the vote is over. Thanks in advance. — Ivan Shmakov (dc) 19:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ludo29

Ludo29 (talk) 12:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous requests

Motoko C. K.@kowiki

User needs Accountcreator for his/her GLAM activity. Temporary rights until September 20. Rejected on local because local sysop lacks technical permission to grant/revoke accountcreator. Please give him/her accountcreator and revoke it by September 20.

Thank you. — regards, Revi 17:47, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. On a side note, wouldn't it look better to the user to say "I will make a request on Meta that this gets done, as I cannot do it locally" instead of "not done, because it's not possible locally"? --MF-W 19:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also