Stewards/Elections 2017/Votes/Cekli829: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 257: Line 257:
# {{Se-vote|2017|Bernd Bergmann|checked=e|cb=Ankry}} [[User:Bernd Bergmann|Bernd Bergmann]] ([[User talk:Bernd Bergmann|talk]]) 22:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2017|Bernd Bergmann|checked=e|cb=Ankry}} [[User:Bernd Bergmann|Bernd Bergmann]] ([[User talk:Bernd Bergmann|talk]]) 22:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2017|Csisc|checked=e|cb=AlvaroMolina}} [[User:Csisc|Csisc]] ([[User talk:Csisc|talk]]) 10:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2017|Csisc|checked=e|cb=AlvaroMolina}} [[User:Csisc|Csisc]] ([[User talk:Csisc|talk]]) 10:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2017|TeriEmbrey|checked=|cb=}} [[User:TeriEmbrey|TeriEmbrey]] ([[User talk:TeriEmbrey|talk]]) 15:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:52, 17 February 2017

Warning

The 2017 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Cekli829 (Tərxan Paşazadə)

ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: az-N, tr-N, cek-N, kjj-3, crh-3, gag-3, ru-2, en-2, kk-1, tt-1, tk-1 and etc.
  • Personal info: (English)
    Greetings all. Respecting tradition, I stand as a candidate again this time because the current rules allow me to become a candidate. I can assure you that after the election my action will be just as effective. You know me from previous elections. Once again I would like to inform you briefly about myself:

    I am Tarkhan Pashazade jachly, from Azerbaijan and origin from Jack village in the Quba Rayon. I’m living in Sumgait city. Date of birth: 29 November 1982.

    First time I registered in Wikipedia on 21 December, 2006 as Tərxan Paşazadə. But currently it’s inactive. Afterwards I registered on February 8, 2009 at Azerbaijani Wikipedia in the username of Cekli829. Since March 27, 2009 I have remained an active on wiki projects.

    My account is active in about 835 sites of project - almost in all of the sites. Generally, I have more than 290 000 editing on the project. Currently I'm a member of at least 19 local groups (sysop/rollbacker/test-admin/reviewer/patroller/rollbacker/editor/etc...) in the wiki-project. I made more than 45 000 sysop actions only on Azerbaijani Wikipedia. I participated to the translation project translatewiki.net as well. Especially if you notice, the Turkish Wikipedia Collaborations project, where I was an active participant in this project in 2011, 2012 and I became the winner of the year. In 2015, I became the completed of the 100wikidays (video-slide) and I be honored as Wikipedia Asian Ambassador.

    I'm also a member of the Azerbaijani Wikimedians User Group and Small Wiki Monitoring Team. I have a great practice in global struggling against vandalism. I’m initiator and participant of Azerbaijani Wikinews, Khinalig Wikipedia projects in Incubator. One of my biggest contribution from the projects was the Commons project (11.000+ file); also Wikidata.

    Wikiness is my lifestyle. I am busy on wiki projects from 1 to 5 hours in a day. I think wiki projects are the great common human worth. I want to be more helpful in this sphere. That is why I would like to serve as a Wikimedia steward. This is already the eighth time of my candidacy. Actually to be a candidate for the previous 7 elections was a great experience for me. Thus, further the elections has an important role in the improvement of my activity, forming as a professional wiki...

    Please support with your vote all of candidates who you like! I wish only the useful result. Doubtless if wikisociety will support me, I am ready to assume the responsibility. I hope wikisociety will support and will give me this honorable responsibility. Because I’m truly a hard working user. You can trust me. Thank you for your consideration!

    Additional user pages: Azerbaijani Wikipedia • Turkish Wikipedia • Commons
    Outside the project: Facebook (profile) • Facebook (page) • YouTube (channel)
    Note: You can also see the presentation I am preparing: Wikipedia: The perfect venue!
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2017/Questions#Cekli829


Yes

  2. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  it would be not bad to have a steward even they have been blocked on a random wiki which has sovereignty conflict issues Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Cavid Sumqayıtlı (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  —  Cavid Sumqayıtlı  14:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Emir of Wikipedia (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Past failures and a blockage on a small wiki not good enough reasons to turn away such a great candidate. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Mehman97 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  Uğurlar Mehman 97 14:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Nuhaa (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  Nuhaa (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. AnselmiJuan (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 • El usuario Cekli829 (Tərxan Paşazadə) me parece muy meritorio, y sin duda mucho ha editado y contribuido en relación a los proyectos wiki. Me agradaría que fuera elegido. -- AnselmiJuan (discusión) 15:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Shriheeran (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Shriheeran (talk) 15:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Lenka64 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Lenka64 (talk) 16:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  BrunoBoehmler (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Excalibur (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Excalibur (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Upstatelee18 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Upstatelee18 (talk) 22:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Iazyges (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Iazyges (talk) 00:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Jusjih (talk) 04:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Alex Khimich (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Alex Khimich (talk) 09:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017 •  Shizhao (talk) 09:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Denver20 (Not eligible, checked by Jerrykim306) •  Yes. Please Denver20 (talk) 10:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Openskye (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Openskye (talk) 12:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Pigsonthewing (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Rampion (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  Rampion (talk) 16:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Darkhan (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Philoratio (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Philoratio (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Nl5836 (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  Nl5836 (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Фред-Продавец звёзд (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Несмотря ни на что - русскоязычные стюарды нужны. В интернете русский язык второй по популярности, и засилье англо-амеров в Вики давно пора разогнать. Фред-Продавец звёзд (talk) 18:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Nutcracker100 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Nutcracker100 (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Brateevsky (talk) 20:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Earthscent (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Earthscent (talk) 02:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Sajid Ahmed Nijhu (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Sajid Ahmed Nijhu (talk) 07:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. 인천직전 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  인천직전 (talk) 08:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Zhanglide (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Zhanglide (talk) 10:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Seems very experienced and I have high hopes he can do the job Rberchie (talk) 10:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Rostamxani (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Rostamxani (talk) 11:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Shotgun pete (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Shotgun pete (talk) 16:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  I'd like to support everyone. Wolverène (talk) 17:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Thatonewikiguy (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Thatonewikiguy (talk) 09:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Sultan11 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  ■ Sultan mesaj 12:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Plasm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Plasm (talk) 14:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Joseph Solis in Australia (Eligible, checked by Gce)2017 •  Joseph Solis in Australia (talk) 16:28, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Anatoliy (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Salicyna (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Salicyna (talk) 07:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Axpde (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  a×pdeHello! 10:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Han-Jun Cho (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Thank you very much.Han-Jun Cho (talk) 13:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC) Han-Jun Cho (talk) 13:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Mogoeilor (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  lrc lori (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Bpierreb (talk) 16:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Gower (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Gower (talk) 20:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  39. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  ArdiPras95 (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Kiraroshi1976 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 08:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Jjjjjjdddddd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 09:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Subscriptshoe9 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Subscriptshoe9 (talk) 15:05, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Әмир (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Әмир (talk) 17:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  44. محک (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Ταπυροι (گپ) 21:28, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  --Fenikals (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Rowde (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Rowde (talk) 19:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Kenricklenno2001 (Not eligible, checked by JustBerry) •  JUST A YES! Kenricklenno2001 (talk) 02:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Tahmina.tithi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Tahmina.tithi (talk) 11:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  48. 斯冰菊 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  斯冰菊 (talk) 12:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  49. HHubi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  HHubi (talk) 17:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Qolcomaq (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Qolcomaq (talk) 17:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Азербайджан-е-Джануби (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  --Азербайджан-е-Джануби (talk) 17:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  52. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  — The preceding unsigned comment was added by İncelemeelemani (talk) Savhñ 20:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017 •  Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 06:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Toni Moser (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017 •  Toni Moser (talk) 06:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  55. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  DENAMAX (talk) 11:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Ce Ele 415 (Verification pending) •  Ce Ele 415 (talk) 15:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  57. TeriEmbrey (Verification pending) •  TeriEmbrey (talk) 15:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. BrxBrx (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  BrxBrx (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Alchimista)2017 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Ran as a candidate in the last seven elections unsuccessfully, and still gives evasive, trolling, and incorrect answers to voter questions. No way I would trust them with private information. Rschen7754 14:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Answers at /Questions do not convince. Vogone (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Ran seven times before and does still not take the questions seriously. Don’t trust him. KPFC 💬 14:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Juliancolton (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  –Juliancolton | Talk 14:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Only when hell freezes. Natuur12 (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Arsog1985 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Don't trust him. Ar sog 14:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Answers to the questions show this is a joke candidature. MF-W 14:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  No. —Ah3kal (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by NickK)2017 • --Gereon K. (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  No confidence in their ability to do the job. Miniapolis 14:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 •  Not satisfied with answers. Ran for seven times in a row but failed to address concerns posed by the community Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Ks-M9 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 •  Never. This is the 8th time? --Ks-M9 [disc.] 14:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 • The user has applied quite a few times in the past without success and I do not think he has yet demonstrated the seriousness and trusted required for this sensitive right. The user was blocked forever in hywiki. File:Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 14:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. OJJ (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  ↑ --OJJ (talk) 14:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  I will support when you have run over 9000 times. SPQRobin (talk) 14:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Herby talk thyme 15:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Stryn (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Lingveno (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Lingveno (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. -revi (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  — regards, Revi 15:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. NickK (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017 •  Being a steward is not a joke. Answers are still bad, and I did not see any evidence the candidate understands the level of trust needed for this position — NickK (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017 •  No. Saying that merely running in the election is a "great experience" quite frankly borders on trolling. That's simply not how it works. The experience being looked for is experience that would cause others to trust him in the steward position. Running seven times and giving evasive and incorrect answers is no way to do that. I strongly urge Cekli829 to not run next year unless something drastic changes. Jasper Deng (talk) 15:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Sabri76 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Mainly per Rschen7754.--Sabri76 (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Gorlingor (Not eligible, checked by NahidSultan) •  --Gorlingor (talk) 16:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Gce (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Il fatto che la sua candidatura sia stata respinta 7 volte di fila avrebbe dovuto farlo desistere dal candidarsi di nuovo, inoltre dato che è stato bloccato su uno dei progetti (seppur piccolo) mi sento di non dargli fiducia. Gce (talk) 16:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Mskyrider (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Mskyrider (talk) 16:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  27. QEDK (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  QEDK (talk) 16:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 17:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  --Hannes 24 (talk) 17:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 • The answers to the questions posed, do not inspire confidence-Cameron11598 (talk) 17:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Ankry (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Ankry (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  He isn't yet appropriate to be steward. --Uğurkenttalk 18:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  33. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  AmaryllisGardener talk 19:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Adog104 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Adog104 (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Milad A380 talk 19:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  -- It is ridiculous. This user should be prevented from running again in the coming years. It's penetrance time robbing. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 20:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  38. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Answers do not inspire confidence. With due respect and appreciation to the candidate, I wonder if it's an English language fluency problem—as much as this is a multilingual world and multilingual role, it's pretty tough to be a steward with en as low as -2. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Rax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  joking answers on very good questions (and as a steward you'll have to stay serious even on very poor questions) Rax (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrence142002 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Reading his answers to the questions, I'm uncertain that he's a serious candidate. Lawrence142002 (talk) 21:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  40. DCB (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  per KPFC DCB (talk) 21:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Blackhat999 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Does not seem to have the requisite maturity for the position. Blackhat999 (talk) 21:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  No, definitely not. User does not take this election as serious as it's suppose to be taken, which makes me think how serious this user will be when it comes to private information. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  No, — xaosflux Talk 22:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Ayagaures 0 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Ayagaures 0 (talk) 22:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Flaviusvulso (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  Flaviusvulso (talk) 22:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Inactive on Wikiversity for two years, we miss your help! --Marshallsumter (talk) 22:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  45. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  Sorry! I can't believe your answer. Eager Lin (Message) 23:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Rxy (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  rxy (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Umberto NURS (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Umberto NURS (msg) 23:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Rubbish computer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 23:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Courcelles 01:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  50. MechQuester (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  His answers are treated like jokes.... No MechQuester (talk) 02:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Drmies (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 • Hell no. Drmies (talk) 03:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  52. GeoO (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Oh no. --geo ») 07:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  53. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 07:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Complainer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Evades relevant questions, and his understanding of the tasks seems limited. Complainer (talk) 08:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Bikarhêner (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Bikarhêner (talk) 08:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  56. NasssaNser (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  While most questions are about their previous candidacies, they don't seems to have an in-depth understanding of why they didn't became a steward and still self-nominate primarily because they are able to be nominated. NasssaNser (talk) 08:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Taivo (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Please do not run next year. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  58. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017 •  MoiraMoira (talk) 10:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  59. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by TBloemink)2017 •  ExtremPilotHD (talk) 11:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  60. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Jerrykim306)2017 •  This joke should end — TBloemink talk 11:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Chaduvari (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Non-serious towards the questions; Not fit to be a Steward.__Chaduvari (talk) 11:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gryllida 11:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Érico (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  No. These requests has been a waste of time for many people. I hope that the rules of the next election will prevent him from running. Érico (talk) 13:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Veikk0.ma (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  His answer to a question about his previous candidacies seems to indicate he doesn't take his candidacy very seriously. Veikk0.ma (talk) 14:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Does not demonstrate ability to perform the function of Steward. Leon saudanha (talk) 14:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Kencola (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Kencola (talk) 14:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  67. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  The Banner (talk) 14:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC) no confidence[reply]
  68. CheChe (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  Does not appear to be engaged with the candidature process, which doesn't give me confidence they will be engaged with the steward role. CheChe (talk) 15:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Unfortunately, I don't feel like the candidate is taking this very seriously. Saying "I stand as a candidate...because the current rules allow me to become a candidate" is not very encouraging. Joshualouie711 (talk) 16:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  70. CreativeC38 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  CreativeC38 (talk) 19:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 19:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Dave Braunschweig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  No. Dave Braunschweig (talk) 20:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Xbony2 (talk) 20:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Barras (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  lolno Barras talk 21:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Theo10011 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Theo10011 (talk) 22:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Predatorix (Not eligible, checked by Ks-M9) •  Predatorix (talk) 23:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Stang (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Sorry. Stang 01:07, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Slowking4 (talk) 02:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Esmost (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Esmost (talk) 04:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  78. OneMember (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017 •  Doesn't take candidacy very seriously at all. OneMember (talk) 06:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Dane (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  It would appear the candidate doesn't take the feedback given to them. Dane (talk) 07:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  80. M-J (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  M-J (talk) 08:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Do not follow (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Definitely not convinced by answers at the Questions page. --——d—n—f (talk) 08:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Grotesque (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Grotesque (talk) 08:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  83. David S. Hwang (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  David S. Hwang (talk) 11:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  84. KlaasZ4usV (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •   Klaas `Z4␟` V:  15:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC) 'nuff said up there[reply]
  85. Lord Roem (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Lord Roem (talk) 00:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Full Rune (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Full Rune (talk) 01:34, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  See you next year! eurodyne (talk) 08:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Fastily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  FASTILY 10:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Varina (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Varina (talk) 10:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Épico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Épico (talk)/(contribs) 10:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Jack1956 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Not happy with the answers. Fails to meet the required standard, IMO. Jack1956 (talk) 11:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Xqt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •   @xqt 12:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Jcornelius (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Jcornelius (talk) 12:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Man77 (Eligible, checked by Gce)2017 •  out of reasonable tradition → «« Man77 »» [de] 16:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  95. OrbiliusMagister (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  - εΔω 17:47, 11 February 2017 (UTC) Cekli829's English language has gotten slightly better, but his skill level in carefully avoiding sound or honest answers to direct questions is still too high. It may work in some other social environment, but in WMF stewardhip collaborative teamwork it is granting him eternal failure. - εΔω 17:47, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Brainswiffer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  --Brainswiffer (talk) 18:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  one of the creations of this user Mathmensch (talk) 18:47, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Informationswiedergutmachung (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  --Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 21:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  --თოგო (D) 21:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC) no way.[reply]
  100. Faltenwolf (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 • -- Faltenwolf (talk) 22:39, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Schnatzel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  How about no. Schnatzel (talk) 23:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Jeff alef (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Jeff alef (talk) 02:59, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Mahir256 (talk) 03:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Avraham (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Avi (talk) 05:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Rollingcontributor (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Answers seem evasive. Rollingcontributor (talk) 05:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Legoktm (talk) 08:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Rauletemunoz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  The user was blocked forever in hywiki. Rauletemunoz 10:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:16, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Lankiveil (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Craig Franklin (talk) 11:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Silraks (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Silraks (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Naminsk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Naminsk (talk) 15:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Ruthven (talk) 21:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Min.neel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Min.neel (talk) 23:37, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Catmando999 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Catmando999 (talk) 03:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Az1568 (talk) 03:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Gridditsch (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Gridditsch (talk) 08:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  115. ChristianKl (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  ChristianKl (talk) 11:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Edisonabcd (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Edisonabcd (talk) 11:44, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Marumari (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Marumari (talk) 14:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Plagiat (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017 •  Plagiat (talk) 21:09, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Dispe (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Dispe (talk) 22:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Sturgeontransformer (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017 •  Sturgeontransformer (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Gts-tg (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gts-tg (talk) 06:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  121. JustBerry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  JustBerry (talk) 06:30, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Bestoernesto (talk) 07:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Bjarlin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  See Jasper Deng, Rax and others and the infinite block at hywiki. Bjarlin (talk) 13:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  124. By erdo can (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Based on the answers to the questions By erdo can • TLK 13:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Joalpe (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Joalpe (talk) 13:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Xneb20 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Xneb20 (talk) 14:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Tesser4D (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  obviously a troll Tesser4D (talk) 16:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 17:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  129. LoudLizard (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  LoudLizard (talk) 18:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  130. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  KTo288 (talk) 19:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Gamaliel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gamaliel (talk) 22:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Beeblebrox (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Beeblebrox (talk) 22:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Muhraz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Muhraz (talk) 01:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Imeriki al-Shimoni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Imeriki al-Shimoni (talk) 07:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Tobovs (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Tobovs (talk) 08:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Hatonjan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Hatonjan (talk) 11:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Slashme (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Candidate just seems to be hat-collecting, and does not have a serious attitude to the election. Slashme (talk) 13:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  139. AFBorchert (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Serious concerns & questions were not addressed. AFBorchert (talk) 14:36, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (talk) 14:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  doesn't seem to take process seriously. Lepricavark (talk) 18:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 20:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Wish I could say yes, but I just can't do it. Dolotta (talk) 20:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Teles (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Making fun of the process sounds disrespectful enough for the Election Commitee to reconsider his capability of being candidate for the next years. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 01:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  145. MarcoAurelio (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  sorry but this ominous continued mockery to the community has to stop —MarcoAurelio 10:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Chris Troutman (talk) 12:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  147. CactusWriter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  CactusWriter (talk) 15:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  148. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 10:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  2. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  GZWDer (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Pearli (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017 •  Pearli (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  B20180 (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  I found his answers unclear and as such I am uncertain of his ability to be effective in the responsibilities of a steward. There certainly is a lot of deep-seated animosity directed at him, simply on the basis of his candidacy. The impetus for that may be his very poor English language skills, or it may be discriminatory for other unstated reasons, of which I cannot discern with any surety. Stevenmitchell (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Rogi.Official (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Unknown Rogi 16:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Uchiha Itachi1990 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Uchiha Itachi1990 (talk) 17:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 20:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Alan (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Alan (talk) 22:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 01:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Ryanx7 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Ryanx7 (talk) 04:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Ngoclong19 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Ngoclong19 (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. InsaneHacker (Eligible, checked by TBloemink)2017 •  I have no doubt that this user has plenty of experience working in the Wiki-sphere, and language shouldn't be that big a concern in my opinion. But the answers to voter questions have not been satisfactory in my opinion. InsaneHacker (talk) 10:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Rzuwig► 11:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. BDaniel (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  BDaniel (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Chansey (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Chansey (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  ysjbserver (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  I don't understand why you're still and still standing for this unsuccessfull election. I've nothing against you, but I think too man failures mean that you'd rather make another choice that standing every year this. Furthermore, I find the answers to the questions you were asked a little cryptic. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  VictorBrice (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. KHMELNYTSKYIA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  KHMELNYTSKYIA (talk) 19:42, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Elmie (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  There are reasons fpr pro and reasons for contra Elmie (talk) 10:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Maynich (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Maynich (talk) 16:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23. BuffaloBob (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  BuffaloBob (talk) 14:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Bernd Bergmann (talk) 22:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Csisc (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Csisc (talk) 10:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. TeriEmbrey (Verification pending) •  TeriEmbrey (talk) 15:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2017/Votes/Cekli829&oldid=16331180"