Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2017/Votes/Cekli829

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2017 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: az-N, tr-N, cek-N, kjj-3, crh-3, gag-3, ru-2, en-2, kk-1, tt-1, tk-1 and etc.
  • Personal info: (English)
    Greetings all. Respecting tradition, I stand as a candidate again this time because the current rules allow me to become a candidate. I can assure you that after the election my action will be just as effective. You know me from previous elections. Once again I would like to inform you briefly about myself:

    I am Tarkhan Pashazade jachly, from Azerbaijan and origin from Jack village in the Quba Rayon. I’m living in Sumgait city. Date of birth: 29 November 1982.

    First time I registered in Wikipedia on 21 December, 2006 as Tərxan Paşazadə. But currently it’s inactive. Afterwards I registered on February 8, 2009 at Azerbaijani Wikipedia in the username of Cekli829. Since March 27, 2009 I have remained an active on wiki projects.

    My account is active in about 835 sites of project - almost in all of the sites. Generally, I have more than 290 000 editing on the project. Currently I'm a member of at least 19 local groups (sysop/rollbacker/test-admin/reviewer/patroller/rollbacker/editor/etc...) in the wiki-project. I made more than 45 000 sysop actions only on Azerbaijani Wikipedia. I participated to the translation project translatewiki.net as well. Especially if you notice, the Turkish Wikipedia Collaborations project, where I was an active participant in this project in 2011, 2012 and I became the winner of the year. In 2015, I became the completed of the 100wikidays (video-slide) and I be honored as Wikipedia Asian Ambassador.

    I'm also a member of the Azerbaijani Wikimedians User Group and Small Wiki Monitoring Team. I have a great practice in global struggling against vandalism. I’m initiator and participant of Azerbaijani Wikinews, Khinalig Wikipedia projects in Incubator. One of my biggest contribution from the projects was the Commons project (11.000+ file); also Wikidata.

    Wikiness is my lifestyle. I am busy on wiki projects from 1 to 5 hours in a day. I think wiki projects are the great common human worth. I want to be more helpful in this sphere. That is why I would like to serve as a Wikimedia steward. This is already the eighth time of my candidacy. Actually to be a candidate for the previous 7 elections was a great experience for me. Thus, further the elections has an important role in the improvement of my activity, forming as a professional wiki...

    Please support with your vote all of candidates who you like! I wish only the useful result. Doubtless if wikisociety will support me, I am ready to assume the responsibility. I hope wikisociety will support and will give me this honorable responsibility. Because I’m truly a hard working user. You can trust me. Thank you for your consideration!

    Additional user pages: Azerbaijani WikipediaTurkish WikipediaCommons
    Outside the project: Facebook (profile)Facebook (page)YouTube (channel)
    Note: You can also see the presentation I am preparing: Wikipedia: The perfect venue!
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2017/Questions#Cekli829


Yes

[edit]
  1. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   it would be not bad to have a steward even they have been blocked on a random wiki which has sovereignty conflict issues Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Cavid Sumqayıtlı (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   —  Cavid Sumqayıtlı  14:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  2. Emir of Wikipedia (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Past failures and a blockage on a small wiki not good enough reasons to turn away such a great candidate. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  3. Mehman97 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017   Uğurlar Mehman 97 14:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  4. Nuhaa (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017   Nuhaa (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  5. AnselmiJuan (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017  El usuario Cekli829 (Tərxan Paşazadə) me parece muy meritorio, y sin duda mucho ha editado y contribuido en relación a los proyectos wiki. Me agradaría que fuera elegido. -- AnselmiJuan (discusión) 15:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  6. Shriheeran (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Shriheeran (talk) 15:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  7. Lenka64 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Lenka64 (talk) 16:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  8. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   BrunoBoehmler (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Excalibur (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Excalibur (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Upstatelee18 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Upstatelee18 (talk) 22:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  9. Iazyges (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Iazyges (talk) 00:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  10. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Jusjih (talk) 04:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  11. Alex Khimich (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Alex Khimich (talk) 09:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  12. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017   Shizhao (talk) 09:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Denver20 (Not eligible, checked by Jerrykim306)   Yes. Please Denver20 (talk) 10:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Openskye (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Openskye (talk) 12:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  13. Pigsonthewing (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  14. Rampion (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   Rampion (talk) 16:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  15. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Darkhan (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Philoratio (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Philoratio (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Nl5836 (Not eligible, checked by Stryn)   Nl5836 (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  16. Фред-Продавец звёзд (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Несмотря ни на что - русскоязычные стюарды нужны. В интернете русский язык второй по популярности, и засилье англо-амеров в Вики давно пора разогнать. Фред-Продавец звёзд (talk) 18:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  17. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  18. Nutcracker100 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Nutcracker100 (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  19. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Brateevsky (talk) 20:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Earthscent (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Earthscent (talk) 02:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Sajid Ahmed Nijhu (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Sajid Ahmed Nijhu (talk) 07:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  20. 인천직전 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   인천직전 (talk) 08:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  21. Zhanglide (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Zhanglide (talk) 10:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  22. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Seems very experienced and I have high hopes he can do the job Rberchie (talk) 10:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  23. Rostamxani (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Rostamxani (talk) 11:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  24. Shotgun pete (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Shotgun pete (talk) 16:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  25. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   I'd like to support everyone. Wolverène (talk) 17:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  26. Thatonewikiguy (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Thatonewikiguy (talk) 09:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  27. Sultan11 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   ■ Sultan mesaj 12:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  28. Plasm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Plasm (talk) 14:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  29. Joseph Solis in Australia (Eligible, checked by Gce)2017   Joseph Solis in Australia (talk) 16:28, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  30. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Anatoliy (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  31. Salicyna (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Salicyna (talk) 07:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  32. Axpde (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   a×pdeHello! 10:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  33. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  34. Han-Jun Cho (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Thank you very much.Han-Jun Cho (talk) 13:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC) Han-Jun Cho (talk) 13:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  35. Mogoeilor (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   lrc lori (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  36. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Bpierreb (talk) 16:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  37. Gower (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Gower (talk) 20:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  38. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   ArdiPras95 (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  39. Kiraroshi1976 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 08:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  40. Jjjjjjdddddd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 09:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  41. Subscriptshoe9 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Subscriptshoe9 (talk) 15:05, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  42. Әмир (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Әмир (talk) 17:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  43. محک (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Ταπυροι (گپ) 21:28, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  44. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   --Fenikals (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  45. Rowde (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Rowde (talk) 19:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Kenricklenno2001 (Not eligible, checked by JustBerry)   JUST A YES! Kenricklenno2001 (talk) 02:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  46. Tahmina.tithi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Tahmina.tithi (talk) 11:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  47. 斯冰菊 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   斯冰菊 (talk) 12:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  48. HHubi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   HHubi (talk) 17:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  49. Qolcomaq (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Qolcomaq (talk) 17:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  50. Азербайджан-е-Джануби (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   --Азербайджан-е-Джануби (talk) 17:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  51. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   — The preceding unsigned comment was added by İncelemeelemani (talk) Savhñ 20:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  52. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017   Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 06:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  53. Toni Moser (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017   Toni Moser (talk) 06:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  54. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   DENAMAX (talk) 11:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  55. Ce Ele 415 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017   Ce Ele 415 (talk) 15:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  56. Maksim L. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Maksim L. (talk) 16:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  57. Eichck (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Eichck (talk) 17:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  58. Jsslee (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   Extremely active user! Jsslee (talk) 21:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  59. Sortilegus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017  --Sortilegus (talk) 20:34, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Marchy088 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Marchy088 (talk) 09:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  60. TmY e12 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   --TmѰ e12 15:28, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  61. Рөстәм Нурыев (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Рөстәм Нурыев (talk) 19:09, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  62. Ләйсән (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Ләйсән (talk) 19:16, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  63. Гүзәл Ситдиҡова (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Гүзәл Ситдиҡова (talk) 19:16, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  64. ZUFAr (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   ZUFAr ZUFAr (talk) 19:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  65. Alfiya55 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Alfiya55 (talk) 19:18, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Мухамадеева (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Мухамадеева (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  66. Frīheidasliova (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Frīheidasliova (talk) 19:40, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  67. З. ӘЙЛЕ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   З. ӘЙЛЕ (talk) 06:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  68. DanielTom (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   DanielTom (talk) 14:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  69. Lotje (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Lotje (talk) 15:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Pngtblrs (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Pngtblrs (talk) 20:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  70. Bigpoliticsfan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Bigpoliticsfan (talk) 22:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Sajid Ahmed Nijhu (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Sajid Ahmed Nijhu (talk) 12:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Memty (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Memty (talk) 08:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Patrickwooldridge (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Patrickwooldridge (talk) 00:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  71. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Wae35244 (talk) 09:36, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  72. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gag0409 (talk) 13:44, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  73. Шухрат Саъдиев (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   --Шухрат Саъдиев (talk) 14:05, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  74. Язев (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Язев (talk) 19:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  75. Xabier Cañas (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017   Xabier Cañas (talk) 02:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  76. Cquoi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Cquoi (talk) 12:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  77. Agremon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Agremon (talk) 20:14, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Ger977 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Ger977 (talk) 03:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Deadrat (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Deadrat (talk) 07:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  78. YaganZ (Eligible, checked by Melquíades)2017   YaganZ (talk) 08:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  79. Gaeanautes (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gaeanautes (talk) 19:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  80. Nebydlogop (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Nebydlogop (talk) 21:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  81. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Dash77 (talk) 04:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       UserDe (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   UserDe (talk) 04:42, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  82. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Good overall experience. Wpollard (talk) 04:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  83. يوسف عاشق الجبل (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   يوسف عاشق الجبل (talk) 11:13, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  84. Ahmer Jamil Khan (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Seems like a good choice! Best of luck! Ahmer Jamil Khan (talk) 12:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply

No

[edit]
  1. BrxBrx (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   BrxBrx (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  2. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Alchimista)2017   Steinsplitter (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  3. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Ran as a candidate in the last seven elections unsuccessfully, and still gives evasive, trolling, and incorrect answers to voter questions. No way I would trust them with private information. Rschen7754 14:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  4. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Answers at /Questions do not convince. Vogone (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  5. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Ran seven times before and does still not take the questions seriously. Don’t trust him. KPFC💬 14:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  6. Juliancolton (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   –Juliancolton | Talk 14:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  7. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Only when hell freezes. Natuur12 (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  8. Arsog1985 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Don't trust him. Ar sog 14:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  9. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Answers to the questions show this is a joke candidature. MF-W 14:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  10. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   No. —Ah3kal (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  11. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by NickK)2017  --Gereon K. (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  12. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017   No confidence in their ability to do the job. Miniapolis 14:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  13. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017   Not satisfied with answers. Ran for seven times in a row but failed to address concerns posed by the community Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  14. Ks-M9 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017   Never. This is the 8th time? --Ks-M9 [disc.] 14:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  15. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017  The user has applied quite a few times in the past without success and I do not think he has yet demonstrated the seriousness and trusted required for this sensitive right. The user was blocked forever in hywiki. —Alvaro Molina ( - ) 14:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  16. OJJ (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017   ↑ --OJJ (talk) 14:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  17. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   I will support when you have run over 9000 times. SPQRobin (talk) 14:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  18. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Herby talk thyme 15:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  19. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Stryn (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  20. Lingveno (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Lingveno (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  21. -revi (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   — regards, Revi 15:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  22. NickK (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017   Being a steward is not a joke. Answers are still bad, and I did not see any evidence the candidate understands the level of trust needed for this position — NickK (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  23. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017   No. Saying that merely running in the election is a "great experience" quite frankly borders on trolling. That's simply not how it works. The experience being looked for is experience that would cause others to trust him in the steward position. Running seven times and giving evasive and incorrect answers is no way to do that. I strongly urge Cekli829 to not run next year unless something drastic changes. Jasper Deng (talk) 15:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  24. Sabri76 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Mainly per Rschen7754.--Sabri76 (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Gorlingor (Not eligible, checked by NahidSultan)   --Gorlingor (talk) 16:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  25. Gce (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Il fatto che la sua candidatura sia stata respinta 7 volte di fila avrebbe dovuto farlo desistere dal candidarsi di nuovo, inoltre dato che è stato bloccato su uno dei progetti (seppur piccolo) mi sento di non dargli fiducia. Gce (talk) 16:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  26. Mskyrider (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Mskyrider (talk) 16:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  27. QEDK (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   QEDK (talk) 16:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  28. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   MZaplotnik (contribs) 17:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  29. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   --Hannes 24 (talk) 17:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  30. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017  The answers to the questions posed, do not inspire confidence-Cameron11598 (talk) 17:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  31. Ankry (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Ankry (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  32. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   He isn't yet appropriate to be steward. --Uğurkenttalk 18:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  33. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   AmaryllisGardener talk 19:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  34. Adog104 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Adog104 (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  35. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Milad A380 talk 19:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  36. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   -- It is ridiculous. This user should be prevented from running again in the coming years. It's penetrance time robbing. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  37. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Dostojewskij (talk) 20:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  38. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Answers do not inspire confidence. With due respect and appreciation to the candidate, I wonder if it's an English language fluency problem—as much as this is a multilingual world and multilingual role, it's pretty tough to be a steward with en as low as -2. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  39. Rax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   joking answers on very good questions (and as a steward you'll have to stay serious even on very poor questions) Rax (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Lawrence142002 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Reading his answers to the questions, I'm uncertain that he's a serious candidate. Lawrence142002 (talk) 21:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  40. DCB (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   per KPFC DCB (talk) 21:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  41. Blackhat999 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Does not seem to have the requisite maturity for the position. Blackhat999 (talk) 21:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  42. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   No, definitely not. User does not take this election as serious as it's suppose to be taken, which makes me think how serious this user will be when it comes to private information. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  43. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   No, — xaosflux Talk 22:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Ayagaures 0 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Ayagaures 0 (talk) 22:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Flaviusvulso (Not eligible, checked by Savh)   Flaviusvulso (talk) 22:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  44. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Inactive on Wikiversity for two years, we miss your help! --Marshallsumter (talk) 22:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  45. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   Sorry! I can't believe your answer. Eager Lin (Message) 23:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  46. Rxy (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   rxy (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  47. Umberto NURS (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Umberto NURS (msg) 23:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  48. Rubbish computer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 23:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  49. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Courcelles 01:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  50. MechQuester (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   His answers are treated like jokes.... No MechQuester (talk) 02:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  51. Drmies (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017  Hell no. Drmies (talk) 03:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  52. GeoO (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Oh no. --geo ») 07:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  53. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   O.Koslowski (talk) 07:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  54. Complainer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Evades relevant questions, and his understanding of the tasks seems limited. Complainer (talk) 08:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  55. Bikarhêner (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Bikarhêner (talk) 08:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  56. NasssaNser (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   While most questions are about their previous candidacies, they don't seems to have an in-depth understanding of why they didn't became a steward and still self-nominate primarily because they are able to be nominated. NasssaNser (talk) 08:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  57. Taivo (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Please do not run next year. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  58. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017   MoiraMoira (talk) 10:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  59. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by TBloemink)2017   ExtremPilotHD (talk) 11:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  60. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Jerrykim306)2017   This joke should end — TBloemink talk 11:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  61. Chaduvari (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Non-serious towards the questions; Not fit to be a Steward.__Chaduvari (talk) 11:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  62. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gryllida 11:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  63. Érico (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   No. These requests has been a waste of time for many people. I hope that the rules of the next election will prevent him from running. Érico (talk) 13:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  64. Veikk0.ma (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   His answer to a question about his previous candidacies seems to indicate he doesn't take his candidacy very seriously. Veikk0.ma (talk) 14:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  65. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Does not demonstrate ability to perform the function of Steward. Leon saudanha (talk) 14:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  66. Kencola (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Kencola (talk) 14:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  67. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   The Banner (talk) 14:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC) no confidencereply
  68. CheChe (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   Does not appear to be engaged with the candidature process, which doesn't give me confidence they will be engaged with the steward role. CheChe (talk) 15:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  69. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Unfortunately, I don't feel like the candidate is taking this very seriously. Saying "I stand as a candidate...because the current rules allow me to become a candidate" is not very encouraging. Joshualouie711 (talk) 16:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  70. CreativeC38 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   CreativeC38 (talk) 19:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  71. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   ~Cybularny Speak? 19:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  72. Dave Braunschweig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   No. Dave Braunschweig (talk) 20:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  73. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Xbony2 (talk) 20:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  74. Barras (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   lolno Barras talk 21:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Theo10011 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Theo10011 (talk) 22:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Predatorix (Not eligible, checked by Ks-M9)   Predatorix (talk) 23:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  75. Stang (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Sorry. Stang 01:07, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  76. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Slowking4 (talk) 02:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  77. Esmost (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Esmost (talk) 04:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  78. OneMember (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017   Doesn't take candidacy very seriously at all. OneMember (talk) 06:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  79. Dane (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   It would appear the candidate doesn't take the feedback given to them. Dane (talk) 07:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  80. M-J (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   M-J (talk) 08:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  81. Do not follow (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Definitely not convinced by answers at the Questions page. --——d—n—f (talk) 08:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  82. Grotesque (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Grotesque (talk) 08:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  83. David S. Hwang (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   David S. Hwang (talk) 11:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  84. KlaasZ4usV (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017    Klaas `Z4␟` V15:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC) 'nuff said up therereply
  85. Lord Roem (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Lord Roem (talk) 00:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  86. Full Rune (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Full Rune (talk) 01:34, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  87. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   See you next year! eurodyne (talk) 08:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  88. Fastily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   FASTILY 10:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  89. Varina (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Varina (talk) 10:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  90. Épico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Épico (talk)/(contribs) 10:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  91. Jack1956 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Not happy with the answers. Fails to meet the required standard, IMO. Jack1956 (talk) 11:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  92. Xqt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017    @xqt 12:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  93. Jcornelius (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Jcornelius (talk) 12:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  94. Man77 (Eligible, checked by Gce)2017   out of reasonable tradition → «« Man77 »» [de] 16:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  95. OrbiliusMagister (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   - εΔω 17:47, 11 February 2017 (UTC) Cekli829's English language has gotten slightly better, but his skill level in carefully avoiding sound or honest answers to direct questions is still too high. It may work in some other social environment, but in WMF stewardhip collaborative teamwork it is granting him eternal failure. - εΔω 17:47, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  96. Brainswiffer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   --Brainswiffer (talk) 18:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  97. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   one of the creations of this user Mathmensch (talk) 18:47, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  98. Informationswiedergutmachung (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   --Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 21:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  99. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   --თოგო (D) 21:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC) no way.reply
  100. Faltenwolf (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017  -- Faltenwolf (talk) 22:39, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  101. Schnatzel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   How about no. Schnatzel (talk) 23:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Jeff alef (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Jeff alef (talk) 02:59, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  102. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Mahir256 (talk) 03:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  103. Avraham (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Avi (talk) 05:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  104. Rollingcontributor (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Answers seem evasive. Rollingcontributor (talk) 05:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  105. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Legoktm (talk) 08:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  106. Rauletemunoz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   The user was blocked forever in hywiki. Rauletemunoz 10:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  107. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   — billinghurst sDrewth 11:16, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  108. Lankiveil (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Craig Franklin (talk) 11:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  109. Silraks (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Silraks (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  110. Naminsk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Naminsk (talk) 15:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  111. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Ruthven (talk) 21:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  112. Min.neel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Min.neel (talk) 23:37, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Catmando999 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Catmando999 (talk) 03:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  113. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Az1568 (talk) 03:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  114. Gridditsch (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Gridditsch (talk) 08:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  115. ChristianKl (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   ChristianKl (talk) 11:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  116. Edisonabcd (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Edisonabcd (talk) 11:44, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Marumari (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Marumari (talk) 14:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  117. Plagiat (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017   Plagiat (talk) 21:09, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  118. Dispe (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Dispe (talk) 22:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  119. Sturgeontransformer (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017   Sturgeontransformer (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  120. Gts-tg (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gts-tg (talk) 06:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  121. JustBerry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   JustBerry (talk) 06:30, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  122. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Bestoernesto (talk) 07:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  123. Bjarlin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   See Jasper Deng, Rax and others and the infinite block at hywiki. Bjarlin (talk) 13:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  124. By erdo can (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Based on the answers to the questions By erdo can • TLK 13:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  125. Joalpe (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Joalpe (talk) 13:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  126. Xneb20 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Xneb20 (talk) 14:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  127. Tesser4D (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   obviously a troll Tesser4D (talk) 16:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  128. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017   Centaur271188 (talk) 17:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  129. LoudLizard (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   LoudLizard (talk) 18:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  130. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   KTo288 (talk) 19:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  131. Gamaliel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gamaliel (talk) 22:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  132. Beeblebrox (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Beeblebrox (talk) 22:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  133. Muhraz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Muhraz (talk) 01:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  134. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  135. Imeriki al-Shimoni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Imeriki al-Shimoni (talk) 07:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  136. Tobovs (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Tobovs (talk) 08:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  137. Hatonjan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Hatonjan (talk) 11:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  138. Slashme (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Candidate just seems to be hat-collecting, and does not have a serious attitude to the election. Slashme (talk) 13:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  139. AFBorchert (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Serious concerns & questions were not addressed. AFBorchert (talk) 14:36, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  140. Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (talk) 14:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  141. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   doesn't seem to take process seriously. Lepricavark (talk) 18:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  142. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 20:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  143. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Wish I could say yes, but I just can't do it. Dolotta (talk) 20:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  144. Teles (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Making fun of the process sounds disrespectful enough for the Election Commitee to reconsider his capability of being candidate for the next years. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 01:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  145. MarcoAurelio (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   sorry but this ominous continued mockery to the community has to stop —MarcoAurelio 10:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  146. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Chris Troutman (talk) 12:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  147. CactusWriter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   CactusWriter (talk) 15:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  148. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 10:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  149. Param Mudgal (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Param Mudgal (talk) 08:17, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  150. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   It's the 6th year in the row. cyrfaw (talk) 08:42, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Avagyan (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Avagyan (talk) 13:55, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  151. UaineSean (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   UaineSean (talk) 16:48, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  152. Geraki (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Geraki TL 19:27, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  153. Smile4ever (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Smile4ever (talk) 12:56, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  154. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Lsanabria (talk) 15:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  155. Music1201 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   Music1201 talk 20:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  156. Masti (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   before You decide to candidate next time sit down a rethink all the comments from last years. masti <talk> 22:25, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  157. Foxj (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   — foxj 22:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  158. BU Rob13 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Ideally, barred from putting forward a candidacy for a period of time because it's downright disruptive to stand for election eight times in a row with zero improvement, no intention to answer questions, and no chance of success. ~ Rob13Talk 03:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Jvikings1 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Jvikings1 (talk) 04:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  159. Yohannvt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Yohannvt (talk) 07:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  160. J budissin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   j.budissin 13:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  161. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   NaBUru38 (talk) 19:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  162. XanaG (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Xana (talk) 19:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  163. Миша Карелин (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   M.Karelin (talk) 05:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  164. *thing goes (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   --*thing goes (talk) 18:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  165. Lomeno 24 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017   Lomeno 24 (Contact me here) 20:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  166. ThePlatypusofDoom (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  167. Murma174 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Murma174 (talk) 18:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  168. Widr (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Widr (talk) 07:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  169. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Litlok (talk) 08:03, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  170. TmY e12 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   --TmѰ e12 08:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  171. Mr.User200 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Mr.User200 (talk) 13:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  172. RickinBaltimore (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  173. Kibele (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   --kibele 16:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  174. Randykitty (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   --Randykitty (talk) 18:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  175. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Kurtis (talk) 19:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  176. Ukexpat (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017   ukexpat (talk) 02:48, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  177. Wieralee (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Wieralee (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  178. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   HMSLavender (talk) 17:08, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  179. Zozoulia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Zozoulia (talk) 17:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  180. Freddy2001 (Eligible, checked by Samuele2002)2017   Freddy2001 talk 22:00, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  181. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Shanmugamp7 (talk) 03:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  182. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Melquíades)2017   I don't see any substantive change since previous candidatures, sadly. Snowolf How can I help? 07:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  183. Nan (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Nan (talk) 09:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  184. SigmaB (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   SigmaB (talk) 20:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  185. Elkelon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Elkelon (talk) 20:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  186. Base (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   I actually wanted to vote pro, the user had so many tries that by them alone it is possible to learn a lot. But then I looked at the answers… Base (talk) 21:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  187. Quiddity (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Quiddity (talk) 22:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  188. African Hope (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   African Hope (talk) 01:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  189. Yohananw (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017   Yohananw (talk) 03:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Wimmiden (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Wimmiden (talk) 10:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  190. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Considering he has run quite a few times unsuccessfully and looking at his answers on the question, this is borderline trolling and I would rather see him barred from any stewards election form this point on, then wasting time of other people. Wiki13 talk 11:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Brocach (Not eligible, checked by Lautaro 97)   Unsatisfactory responses to questions. Brocach (talk) 14:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  191. Bob Burkhardt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Seems too controversial. Poor command of English. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  192. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Timk70 question? 21:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  193. Dwarf Kirlston (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   I was at first very positively impressed with his statement, despite clear english language problems. His answers to questions however were laconic and did not address the very serious issues at stake. Dwarf Kirlston (talk) 21:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  194. Tegel (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017   Tegel (Talk) 23:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  195. JJBers (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017   Just the mere fact that this user has been unsuccessful for so many times is very concerning. JJBers (talk) 23:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  196. Ptolusque (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017   Ptolusque (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  197. Daniel Case (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017   Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply

Neutral

[edit]
  1. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   GZWDer (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  2. Pearli (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017   Pearli (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  3. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   B20180 (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  4. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   I found his answers unclear and as such I am uncertain of his ability to be effective in the responsibilities of a steward. There certainly is a lot of deep-seated animosity directed at him, simply on the basis of his candidacy. The impetus for that may be his very poor English language skills, or it may be discriminatory for other unstated reasons, of which I cannot discern with any surety. Stevenmitchell (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  5. Rogi.Official (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Unknown Rogi 16:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  6. Uchiha Itachi1990 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Uchiha Itachi1990 (talk) 17:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  7. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Ferran Mir (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  8. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Richardkiwi (talk) 20:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  9. Alan (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Alan (talk) 22:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  10. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 01:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  11. Ryanx7 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Ryanx7 (talk) 04:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Ngoclong19 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Ngoclong19 (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  12. InsaneHacker (Eligible, checked by TBloemink)2017   I have no doubt that this user has plenty of experience working in the Wiki-sphere, and language shouldn't be that big a concern in my opinion. But the answers to voter questions have not been satisfactory in my opinion. InsaneHacker (talk) 10:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  13. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Rzuwig 11:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  14. BDaniel (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   BDaniel (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  15. Chansey (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Chansey (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  16. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   ysjbserver (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  17. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   I don't understand why you're still and still standing for this unsuccessfull election. I've nothing against you, but I think too man failures mean that you'd rather make another choice that standing every year this. Furthermore, I find the answers to the questions you were asked a little cryptic. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  18. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   VictorBrice (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  19. KHMELNYTSKYIA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   KHMELNYTSKYIA (talk) 19:42, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  20. Elmie (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   There are reasons fpr pro and reasons for contra Elmie (talk) 10:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  21. Maynich (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Maynich (talk) 16:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  22. BuffaloBob (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   BuffaloBob (talk) 14:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  23. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Bernd Bergmann (talk) 22:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  24. Csisc (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Csisc (talk) 10:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  25. TeriEmbrey (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017   TeriEmbrey (talk) 15:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  26. Onverwacht (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Onverwacht (talk) 07:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  27. Samuele2002 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Samuele2002 (talk) 22:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  28. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Tvcccp (talk) 02:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  29. Meracritus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Meracritus (talk) 17:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  30. HowardMorland (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   HowardMorland (talk) 11:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  31. Minoo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Minoo (talk) 18:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  32. Gampe (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gampe (talk) 05:03, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  33. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Cbyd (talk) 22:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  34. Seven twentynine (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Seven twentynine (talk) 06:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  35. Nickrds09 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Nickrds09 (Talk to me) 10:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply