Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2014/Votes/Cekli829

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Cekli829 (Tərxan Paşazadə)[edit]


Cekli829 talkcontribsSULutil (accounts) / stalktoyglobalcontribscrosswiki-nessconfirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings


  • Languages: az-N, tr-N, cek-N, kjj-3, crh-3, gag-3, ru-2, en-2, kk-1, tt-1, tk-1 and etc.
  • Personal info: Greetings all. I am Tarkhan Pashazade jachly, from Azerbaijan and origin from Jack village. I’m living in Sumgait city. First time I registered in Wikipedia on 21 December, 2006 as Tərxan Paşazadə. But currently it’s inactive. Afterwards I registered on February 8, 2009 at Azerbaijani Wikipedia in the username of Cekli829. Since March 27, 2009 I have remained an active on wiki projects. My account is active in about 821 sites of project - almost in all of the sites. Generally, I have more than 191 000 editing on the project. Currently I'm a member of at least 14 local groups (sysop/rollbacker/test-admin/reviewer/patroller/rollbacker/editor/etc...) in the wiki-project. I made more than 20 000 sysop actions only on Azerbaijani Wikipedia. I participated to the translation project translatewiki.net as well. Especially if you notice, the Turkish Wikipedia Collaborations project, where I was an active participant in this project in 2011, 2012 and I became the winner of the year. I'm also a member of the Small Wiki Monitoring Team. I have a great practice in global struggling against vandalism. I’m initiator and participant of Azerbaijani Wikinews, Khinalig Wikipedia projects in Incubator. One of my biggest contribution from the projects was the Commons project; also Wikidata. Wikiness is my lifestyle. I am busy on wiki projects from 6 to 10 hours in a day. I think wiki projects are the great common human worth. I want to be more helpful in this sphere. That is why I would like to serve as a Wikimedia steward. This is already the fifth time of my candidacy. Actually to be a candidatefor the previous 4 elections was a great experience for me. Thus, further the elections has an important role in the improvement of my activity, forming as a professional wiki... Please support with your voteall ofcandidates who you like! I wish only the useful result. Doubtless if wikisociety will support me, I am ready to assume the responsibility. I hope wikisociety will support and will give me this honorableresponsibility. Because I’m truly and hard working user. You can trust me. Thank you for your consideration!
    Special note: I'm opposed to english domination on WP.
    Additional user pages: Azerbaijani WikipediaTurkish WikipediaCommons
    Outside the project: Facebook (profile)Facebook (page)

Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2014/Questions#Cekli829


  1. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Where there's a will there's a way. Better late than never. İncelemeelemani (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Brateevsky (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Emin message 19:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Maurice07 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Maurice07 (talk) 19:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Alibek2030 (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf)   Alibek2030 (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Marmase (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   --Marmase (talk) 20:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Samizambak (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Samizambak (talk) 20:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Rome2 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Rome2 (talk) 20:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jfblanc (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Jfblanc (talk) 21:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. D Eaketts (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   D Eaketts (talk) 21:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Klymets (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Klymets (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. DanielTom (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   DanielTom (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Kolega2357 (talk) 23:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. SamanthaPuckettIndo (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Ok. SamanthaPuckettIndo (talk) 00:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Fil211 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Fil211 (talk) 04:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Arystanbek (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   Arystanbek (talk) 05:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Георгий Суворов (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   (no comments) Георгий Суворов (talk) 07:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. D2513850 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   林勇智 13:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Caglarctr (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   I wish you continued success is very experienced and knowledgeable. Caglarctr (talk) 15:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Рөстәм Нурыев (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   --Рөстәм Нурыев (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Therou (Not eligible, checked by Alan)   Therou (talk) 17:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. JB82 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   JB82 (talk) 22:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Namikilisu (Not eligible, checked by Alan)   Namikilisu (talk) 08:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Memty (Not eligible, checked by Alan)   Memty (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Jusjih (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Emreculha (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   CAN AzerbayCAN!!! Emreculha (talk) 02:24, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   I have confidence. Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Alberto568 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Alberto568 (talk) 11:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Magawla61 (Not eligible, checked by Alan)   Magawla61 (talk) 13:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Erne Mogilevich (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Look at that languages! Erne る Mogilevich (ノート投稿記録) 21:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Żyrafał (talk) 18:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Rovshan.95 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Rovshan.95 (talk) 22:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Talha Samil Cakir (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Talha Samil Cakir (talk) 19:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Fkhoveli (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014   Fkhoveli (talk) 06:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Sortilegus (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014   Sortilegus (talk) 21:45, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Samral (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014   Çox aktiv idarəçidir Samral (talk) 21:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  33. jaba1977 (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014  --Jaba1977 (talk) 14:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Kateryna Kiryeyeva (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   Kateryna Kiryeyeva (talk) 22:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   Shizhao (talk) 00:40, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  36. KundaliniZero (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014   we need suport in "es" wikipedia KundaliniZero (talk) 05:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Jim Fitzgerald (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014   Jim Fitzgerald (talk) 09:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Wertuose (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014   Wertuose (talk) 13:35, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Vago (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014   Vago tp 16:31, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014   Bpierreb (talk) 07:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  41. محک (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Ταπυροι (گپ) 15:32, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Hgav (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   I suppose could be ready! I belive it!!! Hgav (talk) 15:56, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Giftzwerg 88 (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014   Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 11:21, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  44. NKOzi (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014   trusted user N KOziTalk 20:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  45. OhanaUnited (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014   Mastery in English is not a deal-breaker OhanaUnitedTalk page 22:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Mátyás (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014   We do need polyglots like you. Mátyás (talk) 11:38, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Lonet (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014   ok Lonet (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Aurora (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   ...Aurora... (talk) 03:08, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Pjoef (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   –pjoef (talkcontribs) 09:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Asifmuktadir (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014   Asifmuktadir (talk) 12:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014   Anatoliy (talk) 21:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Orgio89 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   you are right! Orgio89 (talk) 04:39, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


  1. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Cekli829 has candidated himself for every steward election since 2011, but each year he fails to properly address the issues he's asked about. I specifically attempted to ask him to expand at some length on his history here, the canvassing, the ignoring of questions, but failed to obtain a meaningful answer. Snowolf How can I help? 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. LlamaAl (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Per Snowolf. LlamaAl (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   The same procedure as every year. No convincing statement, and no convincing answers to the questions either (the answers are either of dubious content or no real answers at all, just links to policies or so, and the candidate doesn't even seem to understand those he links to). Also a recent ridiculous right request on Incubator makes me think he is just trying to collect hats. MF-W 18:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   per MF-Warburg. SPQRobin (talk) 18:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. John F. Lewis (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Obviously not knowing the full situation; the basic attitude from them and the fact this is their 4th or 5th attempt now says more than I could really. Also per Snowolf etc. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Alan (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Per above Alan (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. TCN7JM (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   I can't support this. The language barrier is one minor thing, but as this is the user's fourth straight year running for steward and he still can't address issues others have about him, he isn't fit for this bit. (In other words, per Snowolf with other rationale) TCN7JM 18:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   MF-W pretty much sums it up for me. Mh7kJ (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. JurgenNL (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   No confidence. Per above. JurgenNL (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Sorry. I agree with the people above me. Can't word it any better. Wiki13 talk 18:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Per MF-Warburg. Érico Wouters msg 18:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Per above DangSunM (talk) 19:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   No comment. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   MoiraMoira (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Rubin16 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   rubin16 (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Could not answer even the most basic questions. Blocked on one wiki and had other incidents pointed out by no voters in previous elections (one such comment was in one of the languages Cekli knows, and he didn't even address that).Jasper Deng (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Rzuwig 20:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ebe123 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 20:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Toma646 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Вы единственный кандидат, который говорить по русски - это ваше большое плюс. Но у вас также большие недостатки, которые показались в вашей дискуссии в русской Википедии. После 100000 правок вы не знаете что авторское право и мне крайне не нравиться, что в русской Википедии отвечаете в азербайджанском языке!--Toma646 (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Per MF-Warburg. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014   Legoktm (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014   Per MF-Warburg and and this. Southparkfan 22:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Thanks for continued stewards election entertainment efforts. Nemo 22:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014   Per Snowolf. Trijnsteltalk 22:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Gilderien (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   Unwilling to answer questions to an adequate standard. Gilderien (talk) 23:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   –Ejs-80 23:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Hosiryuhosi (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Daniel Mietchen (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Big plus for language skills, but otherwise not fit for the task. Daniel Mietchen (talk) 01:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Teles (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   Can't answer simple questions. No cross-wiki activity, not learning from mistakes, doesn't seem to have proper idea of what is this about. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 02:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    sulinfo for cross-wiki. --►Cekli829 18:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Not very encouraging answers to questions. Gryllida 03:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   Armbrust (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   per Snowolf and MF-W Glaisher [talk] 03:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Hkjacksonhk (talk) 03:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Per SPQRobin Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  36. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   David1010 (talk) 05:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Byfserag (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   Byfserag (talk) 07:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Ivan Štambuk (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Varina (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Varina (talk) 09:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Bene* (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014   Bene* (talk) 11:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Mehran (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Mehran Debate 11:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Laaknor (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Not answering questions in a good way is not good for a steward. Communications is everything for stewards Laaknor (talk) 13:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Steinsplitter (talk) 13:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Goldenburg111 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Heh! Not answering questions asked by different users is enough for me to go down to an oppose. --Goldenburg111 17:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Morphypnos (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014  --Mɔʁfipnɔs (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Abd (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   See [1] and [2]. This candidate responds poorly to criticism, as shown. Fatal error.
  47. Blackfish (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Blackfish (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Jni (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   jni (talk) 18:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Someone not using his real name (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   I'm not sure if it's a language/presentation issue, but the candidate's statement reads like a weird agenda. Someone not using his real name (talk) 18:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Cekli829 has successfully alienated me, thereby losing my vote. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Mathonius (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Still too many communication issues. Mathonius (talk) 22:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  52. FakirNL (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Per above. FakirNL (talk) 22:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  53. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   I don't think he is steward-material. Too many issues. GyaroMaguus (talk) 01:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Hym411 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   —레비Revi 07:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Höstblomma (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   sorry, but not convinced that this candidate is ready for stewardship, mainly because strange response towards criticism. Höstblomma (talk) 07:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Obelix (talk) 13:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Jafeluv (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Jafeluv (talk) 13:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Quentinv57 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Still not convinced Quentinv57 (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Zinnmann (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Zinnmann (talk) 14:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Zerabat (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014   Zerabat (discusión) 17:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Wikit 18:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Niesy74 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Niesy74 (talk) 20:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  63. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   NaBUru38 (talk) 23:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  64. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   per Snowolf and TCN7JM. AmaryllisGardener (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Courcelles 02:40, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Imzadi1979 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Imzadi 1979  10:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Murma174 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Murma174 (talk) 11:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       فلورانس (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf)   Florence (talk) 13:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Kapsuglan (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Kapsuglan (talk) 21:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   not going to happen Guerillero 02:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   --Hubertl (talk) 10:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC) It´s a joke, is´nt it?[reply]
  71. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   For the same reasons as last year, and the years before. Answers to questions are not satisfactory, and the "opposed to English domination" attitude must end. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 20:32, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Locke Cole (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   —Locke Coletc 00:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Xqt (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014    @xqt 11:13, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Gonzolito (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Per MF-W Gonzolito (talk) 12:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Sargoth (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014   Sargoth (talk) 15:35, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  76. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014   6AND5 (talk) 18:17, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014   Not convinced Ronhjones (talk) 22:00, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Troubled asset (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014   No satisfactory answers to the more than justified questions on the talk page. Sorry, too much doubt. Troubled @sset   Work    Talk    Mail   10:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Ul1-82-2 (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014   Ul1-82-2 (talk) 19:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Geolina163 (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   Geolina163 (talk) 20:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   ST 22:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Mr. Stradivarius (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   Per Snowolf. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 01:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014   Present as a troublemaker. Not enough wikilove with his special note. Abaddon1337 (talk) 11:18, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Oursdesmontagnes (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014   Oursdesmontagnes (talk) 11:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2014   -- maybe you stop trying next year. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:56, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  86. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   CT Cooper · talk 17:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Man77 (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2014   → «« Man77 »» [de] 18:38, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Intothatdarkness (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Intothatdarkness (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Technical 13 (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014   Technical 13 (talk) 04:02, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014   Waka Waka (talk) 08:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014   Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:55, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Axou (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014   I agree with the people above. I think this candidate is not ready for stewardship. Axou (talk) 13:52, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Gamma127 (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014   Gamma127 (talk) 14:46, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Too much evasiveness in the answers. Harlock81 (talk) 13:57, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Beeblebrox (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014   Still doesn't seem to even understand what a steward is. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:31, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Minihaa (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014   Minihaa (talk) 15:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Pundit (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014   per Snowolf Pundit (talk) 15:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Bearas (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Bearas (talk) 12:00, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       LessayCatus (Not eligible, checked by Alan)   LessayCatus (talk) 10:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Rax (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   --Rax (talk) 15:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC) not convincing - evasive answers on valid questions[reply]
  100. Toto Azéro (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014   Per MF-Warburg. Toto Azéro follow the guide ! 20:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  101. JordiCuber (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014   I am de:Benutzer:Jordi (Diff). To check my eligibility see my user page, thx.--JordiCuber (talk) 13:51, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   FASTILY 09:25, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Randykitty (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Randykitty (talk) 15:04, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  104. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   FeralOink (talk) 15:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Benjamlikesjam (Not eligible, checked by Avraham)   I value the use of several/many languages, but English is very important to the communication between people from around the world. You may well be against it but how can you expect to serve as a steward on Wikimedia without massively using it ? And the unconvincing answers bother me too Benjamlikesjam (talk) 02:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  105. I am One of Many (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014   Per snowolf I am One of Many (talk) 04:58, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Drgkl (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   --Drgkl (talk) 11:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  107. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   小躍 (talk) 08:15, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Tegel (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Tegel (Talk) 16:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   The language barrier still seems to be too major to me. Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   I agree with Vogone. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    To clarify, I think his knowledge of many languages would be helpful, but his English is not very good. He is not experienced with cross-wiki or Meta work (such as SWMT). PiRSquared17 (talk) 05:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    sulinfo for cross-wiki. --►Cekli829 18:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I actually am amazed by how many edits you have crosswiki, but I don't think you could remain neutral in a dispute involving Azeri projects or Armenian projects. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ralgis (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   --Allan Aguilar • /t/ 19:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Speaking frainkly I cannot see any logic reason to vote pro. However even an opposal here has become almost useless. Vituzzu (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Sorry, but I wish you good luck. Stryn (talk) 19:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Guycn2 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Guycn2 (talk) 19:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. AGK (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   AGK [•] 23:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Aldnonymous (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Did you mean "I oppose the domination of English language on Wikipedia"- I don't see any context behind this words/sentence, could you at least explain more, you are the most confusing candidate than other candidate I've seen.--Ald™ (talk) 00:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   Keen and good breadth of languages. Needs more experience in meta issues. I recommend you help the SWMT before applying for steward again. John Vandenberg (talk) 04:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Hydriz (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   I would love to support, but I believe everyone here would like to know more about this user's plans in being a steward before granting such a flag. Hydriz (talk) 09:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Clockery (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Clockery Fairfeld (talkenWS) 12:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Taichi - (あ!) 01:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   English Wikipedia has next to nothing to do with stewardry. I am not certain that you have the right understanding of the tasks undertaken.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Well I don't wish to pile in the no votes. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Not sure what you mean by being opposed to English domination. I am opposed to any language group dominating, but I don't see English dominating anything. Wpollard (talk) 13:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Midnight Gambler (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   According to some negative arguments above, I don't support the proposal, but I also don't want to oppose it. Midnight Gambler (talk) 17:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   I've seen this user in azwiki. Doing pretty good there. But watching his answers at /Question page I think this time he's not suitable. So I can' support him. But his good works at az wiki is stopping me from voting No. So I'm staying neutral. But wish you a very good luck. Pratyya (Hello!) 03:48, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Drzewianin (talk) 15:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Sj (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   Good contributions on many wikis; controversial ones on a few. Focus on more SWMT work, please. SJ talk  09:57, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Keete 37 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Keete 37 (talk) 08:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Tremonist (Not eligible, checked by Avraham)   Tremonist (talk) 16:41, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. The Anonymouse (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014   Communication issues among many other things, something just doesn’t seem right. No reason to support, but no point in opposing now. The Anonymouse [talk] 19:39, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Tonelada (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014   Tonelada (talk) 00:57, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Sitic (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014   Sitic (talk) 15:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Reade (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014   Reade (talk) 19:19, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]