Jump to content

Stewards/elections 2009/votes

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning The 2009 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
Index: See Stewards/elections 2009 (Purge the cache of this page?)


Al Lemos

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. Support Support Jagwar 14:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Support Computer wh 15:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Support Luan 00:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Lyon88 00:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC) uneligible voter. Account created yesterday. es:Drini 01:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Support Udufruduhu 00:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Support --Ginosal 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Support Raafael D 02:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  7. Support Support Mwaldeck msg 04:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Support Will he break the wiki? Most likely not. ErikTheBikeMan 04:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Definitely yes. I'd go with a staatement of values and intent anyday, over statements of experience. Apologies if I've got anything wrong on following this voting process though ~ I'm new, with one of the two articles I've submitted so far already under review for deletion~:o)Skankarbaba Uneligible voter. Confirmed by AccountEligibility Béria Lima Msg 11:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Support --Sir James 05:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Sh1019 08:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter. Confirmed by AccountEligibility Béria Lima Msg 11:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Caspiax --Caspiax 09:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter: The user don't have an account on Meta with userpage linked to his/her homewiki. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 17:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support Support Fruggo 10:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Support--Konsnos 10:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support EUDOXIO 10:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Support NoychoH 13:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Support — Albert Krantz¿? 16:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support SupportGlobalphilosophy 16:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support Yes. Definitely. CJS102793 18:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support --Nrainer 23:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support --Jouris2009.2.2 (UTC) Uneligible voter. This account isn't registered on Meta. --Lucas Nunes 16:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support ----Zeljko 09:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support Wouterhagens 16:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support--Psiblastaeban 16:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Uneligible voter: The user don't have an account on Meta with userpage linked to his/her homewiki. Alex Pereira falaê 17:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --201.9.61.98 18:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC) uneligible voter. It's just an IP.- 天使 BlackBeast Do you need something? 20:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support pro carioca! -- Linksfuss 21:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support Support --Arcudaki 14:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Support --Lighterside 16:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support --Alex Esp 23:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Support - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 02:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Support Ozymandias 09:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support Support Booksworm 19:55, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support yes -- A2 supersonique 22:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter --Nice poa 01:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support Support Multilingual. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 17:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support --Snake311 20:02, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. --Nick1915 - all you want 11:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support I voted for you. Now, where's that bribe you promised me? PM me and I'll give you the account number. Heh, these suckers are gonna be taken for a spin. --85.164.165.51 16:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter, it's just an IP. --Nice poa 21:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Support Muro de Aguas 17:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Matema 09:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter --Nice poa 00:53, 11 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]
  29. Support Support Albmont 11:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support Support Kabri 18:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support Support --Lohen11 15:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Support Support --4wajzkd02 09:33, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support Support --Alborz Fallah 18:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Support Support Has all the right language and other skills Carsrac 23:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support Support Christian Hartmann 15:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. Oppose Oppose — Aitias // discussion 00:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose Oppose --Thogo (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Oppose Imho the user has not enough experience, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose Oppose No. Razorflame 00:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    No. Horacewai2 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter. Confirmed by AccountEligibility Béria Lima Msg 11:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose Oppose No. Puntori 00:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose Oppose No. Micha L. Rieser 00:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Oppose Oppose No.--Seha 00:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose Oppose --Kanonkas 00:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Oppose Oppose No. Not enough experience for stewardship, what you describe is totally different from what stewardship is. Romaine 00:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oppose Oppose Az1568 (talk) 00:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Oppose Oppose No/いいえ. --Taichi - (あ！) 00:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Oppose Oppose per Romaine Herr Kriss 00:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose Oppose sorry, but No per Romaine Marcus Cyron 00:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Oppose Oppose Seems not to understand what being a steward is, or what would make one qualified to do the job.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Oppose Oppose No. Seems to not understand what stewardship is. — neuro(talk) 13:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Oppose Oppose --FollowTheMedia 01:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Yym1997 02:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible: This user don't have an account on Meta with userpage linked to his homewiki —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 16:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Oppose Oppose I like the attitude, and the thoughtful question answers, but I think you need more experience with adminship and general wiki operations across multiple wikis. Perhaps next year? ++Lar: t/c 02:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Oppose Oppose --Tomatejc 02:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Oppose Oppose Not at the level I expect of stewards. Prodego talk 04:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Oppose Oppose Avjoska 06:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Oppose Oppose Achates 07:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Oppose Oppose No --Shipmaster 07:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Oppose Oppose No --Producer 08:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Oppose Oppose Merdis 09:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter: The user don't have an account on Meta with userpage linked to his/her homewiki. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 17:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not anymore. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 15:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Oppose Oppose No --Dr. Gert Blazejewski 09:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Oppose Oppose Adrian 1111 09:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Oppose Oppose No, involved recently in too many unnecessary conflicts in Portuguese Wikipedia. RafaAzevedo 09:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[1][reply]
  28. Oppose Oppose Whilst it'd be good to have non-en stewards, this chap lacks experience. Computerjoe 09:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Oppose Oppose --Brownout(msg) 09:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Oppose Oppose No --Church of emacs 10:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Oppose Oppose Béria Lima Msg 10:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC) I agree whit Romaine. "Not enough experience for stewardship"[reply]
  32. Oppose Oppose Per Romaine. Jon Harald Søby 10:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Oppose Oppose --AFBorchert 10:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC) per birdy and Lar[reply]
  34. Oppose Oppose Njaelkies Lea 11:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Oppose Oppose Vyk 11:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Oppose Oppose I'm sorry. I believe in your good purpose, but not enough experience for stewardship. Smihael 11:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Oppose Oppose Calandrella 13:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC) I agree with Smihael.[reply]
  38. Oppose Oppose —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 14:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Oppose Oppose Stewards should have the experience and trust that comes with being an admin on their home project. John Vandenberg 14:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Oppose Oppose --MF-W 14:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Oppose Oppose Not this year. -- Nahum 14:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Oppose Oppose Stewards should be able to describe what stewardship is and should be an admin on their home wiki. Per Romaine and per Jauvdb. ѕwirlвoy ₪ 14:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Oppose Oppose Filipe RibeiroMsg 14:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not now.[reply]
  44. Oppose OpposeObelix 14:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --91.43.224.39 15:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Please login to vote. Bence My Talk 14:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Oppose Oppose No. Jdrewitt 15:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Oppose Oppose Not really. --Ciphers 17:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Oppose Oppose À cause du manque d'expérience avec les outils d'admin. / Lack of experience with admins' tools. --Edhral 18:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Oppose Oppose Lack of experience and bad understanding of the steward duties — NickK 19:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Oppose Oppose ack NickK --RoswithaC 19:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Oppose Oppose No. Alefbe 19:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Oppose Oppose –Ejs-80 20:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Oppose Oppose NonvocalScream 20:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Oppose Oppose No. Wants to remove "absentee" admins for no good reason. Rspeer 21:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Oppose Oppose --Ilyaroz 00:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Oppose Oppose --PietJay 07:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Oppose Oppose ~ putnik 07:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Oppose Oppose Stewardship is not only checkuser. Leujohn 08:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Oppose Oppose --Uwe Gille 09:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Oppose Oppose no experience--Nick1915 - all you want 11:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Oppose Oppose Too few user rights => not much experience. --FiliP × 12:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Oppose Oppose GlassCobra 14:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Oppose Oppose Contra. QuartierLatin1968 20:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Oppose Oppose I don't see expierence. Should be an admin.- 天使 BlackBeast Do you need something? 20:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Oppose Oppose --Stepri2003 20:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Oppose Oppose--Davecrosby uk 00:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Oppose Oppose Mailer Diablo 03:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Oppose Oppose Tcrow777 04:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Oppose Oppose Stef48 08:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Oppose Oppose --Tarantelle 10:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Oppose Oppose no experience to this. Alex Pereira falaê 12:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Oppose Oppose Not enough experience or understanding of the role. Maedin\talk 13:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Oppose Oppose I am not sure you fully understand the role of stewards. Anonymous101 17:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Oppose Oppose Fred Xavier 19:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Oppose Oppose Tiptoety talk 20:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Oppose Oppose --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Oppose Oppose Apparently doesn't know what the position is about.--Cerejota 04:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Oppose Oppose Doesn't seem like enough experience. ...Aurora... 11:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Oppose Oppose Don't have experience. --Lucas Nunes 16:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Oppose Oppose Nones. --Tesi1700 17:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Oppose Oppose Not enough experience. --Tchoř 02:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Oppose Oppose sorry but need more experience --Gdgourou 10:18, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Oppose Oppose No Modernist 03:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Oppose Oppose GoEThe 10:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Tends to resolve disputes by attacking the opponent rather than the question and when proposing policy shoves opposition under the carpet by pushing for a vote instead of trying to build consensus.[reply]
  84. Oppose Oppose Urielpunk 14:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)?[reply]
    Meekohi 22:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Oppose Oppose No. TFBCT1 17:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Oppose Oppose Nadzieja 18:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC) The user had a discussion with me in pt.wikipedia (initialized by he), and was agressive and impertinent with me and another user that was in his right: making comments in the discussion page of the pt.wiki article "Sockpuppet". The user don't have enough maturity to be a Steward. I agree with the user GoEThe: The user resolve disputes by attacking the opponent. 'Cause this my vote is no![reply]
  87. Oppose Oppose IMatthew 20:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Oppose Oppose --Nice poa 21:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC) I'm sorry, but he 'argues' too much with everybody for everything and uses to offend and to mock his opponents![reply]
  89. Oppose Oppose No -- per unaddressed concerns from other editors. Message From Xenu 10:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Oppose Oppose at first you'll need to be experienced as sysop anywhere - IMHO - sorry --Rax 22:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Oppose Oppose not even a sysop on any project, and does not seem to understand well the stewards' role. O. Morand 00:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Oppose Oppose Not enough exp. --Sampi 02:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Oppose Oppose Lack of admin experience, misunderstanding of steward role. Nbarth 01:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Oppose Oppose Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 06:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Oppose Oppose--Drboisclair 22:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Oppose Oppose--Thesupermat 09:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Oppose Oppose-- Harrywad 23:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Oppose Oppose Nearby, but needs still experience --Höyhens 02:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Oppose Oppose Tosão 20:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC) No,no,no![2][reply]
  100. Oppose Oppose If you resign from proposed adminship why should we trust you stewardship? Masti 21:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Oppose Oppose --Techman224Talk 02:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[3][reply]
  102. Oppose Oppose -- it's not necessary for him to add footnotes to opposing comments, and his doing so clearly demonstrates that he should not be a steward. KrakatoaKatie 20:15, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. Neutral Neutral Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I know nothing about the experience of candidate. Unfortunately, I can not understand Portuguese, and I'm out of estimation.LexArt 14:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 19:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I am ambivalent. Rangond 06:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 19:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral Neutral Kushal one 11:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral Neutral Bence My Talk 14:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Neutral Neutral Punx 09:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    WITSPUTZ 17:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 00:47, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutral Neutral DanielRute 22:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Neutral Neutral Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 13:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Nothing against the user. He's indeed a great editor on Wiki-pt. But he's a bit nervous and he does not like being questioned and contradicted. He must change that. But in general, he doesn't like canvassing and elitism, and that's great! Especially in Wiki-pt where our adminship is focused in elitism and friendship. Being an administrator there is nothing, really.[reply]
  7. --Mayer Bruno 21:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Info

Meet some people from Lusophone Wikipedia that are not only voting against me (what is perfectly democratical), but blaming me... - Al Lemos 14:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ↑ This fellow has so many enemies in the lusophone Wikipedia that was nicknamed "rabid dog" by a veteran editor.
  2. ↑ Candidate for sysop. In the voting under way, an editor (Pediboi) said about him: "without saving articles a large number of times in quick succession, a thing that he usually do, he don't will obtain the minimum number of 2000 editions in the mainspace; I smell a scam here."
  3. ↑ It's old news. The world has changed since January 2007...

View vote page

Alexanderps

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. Support Support —DerHexer (Talk) 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Support Computer wh 15:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Yes. Razorflame 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Changed to neutral.[reply]
  3. Support Support André Teixeira Lima 00:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Support NuclearWarfare 00:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Horacewai2 00:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter. Confirmed by AccountEligibility Béria Lima Msg 11:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Support I'm happy here. Majorly talk 00:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Support Puntori 00:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Support Luan 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Support Mr.Z-man 00:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Support — vvv 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support Support yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Support Epinheiro 00:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC), of course![reply]
  12. Support Support --Seha 00:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Udufruduhu 00:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)not eligible to vote--Pediboi 14:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Support Cbrown1023 talk 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Support Az1568 (talk) 00:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Support Chick Bowen 00:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support Yes/Sí/はい. --Taichi - (あ！) 00:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support Vini 175 01:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support — neuro(talk) 01:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support --FollowTheMedia 01:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support --Ivan Štambuk 01:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support Support --Shizhao 01:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Yamaka122 ...:) 02:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)not eligible to vote.--Pediboi 13:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Support bibliomaniac15 03:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support --Luisfege 03:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Support--1j1z2 03:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Support More workers are needed. --Millosh 03:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support Support, of course. Mwaldeck msg 04:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support Support GlassCobra 05:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Support --Sir James 05:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support Support Avjoska 06:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support Support Rubin16 08:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support Support Sebleouf 08:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Support Support Octahedron80 09:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support Support Otourly 09:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Item 09:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC) not eligible to vote--Pediboi 13:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Support Support RafaAzevedo 09:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support Support yeaaaaaaaaaaaaa --.snoopy. ✉ 09:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support Support --StSasha 09:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC) ДА.[reply]
  37. Support Support --Wing 10:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support Support sounds fine --Church of emacs 10:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Support Support Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Samyn97 10:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter. Confirmed by AccountEligibility Béria Lima Msg 11:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Support Support Béria Lima Msg 10:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Complete support.[reply]
  41. Support Support →Na·gy 11:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Nikolia 14:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter: Innexistent account —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 17:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please sign in to vote. →Na·gy 11:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support Support Vyk 11:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Support Support The Helpful One 11:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support Support Stealth500
  45. Support Support EUDOXIO 11:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Support Support axpdeHello! 12:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Support Support --Ahonc 13:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support Support -- Nahum 14:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Support Support Stifle 14:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Support Support Obelix 14:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Support Support --Garfieldairlines 15:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support Support --Furado 16:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Support Support iAlex 16:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Good luck! That Thing There 17:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC) I'm sorry, it appears you're ineligible to vote.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 17:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Support Support SOAD KoRn 17:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Support Support Saloca 20:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Takkyuu 21:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC) not elligible to vote--Pediboi 12:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Support Support --buecherwuermlein 06:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Good. Rangond 07:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 19:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Support Support No objection.--Wikipedian (Activist) 08:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Support Support Oui --P@d@w@ne 08:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support Support Looks about right. --FiliP × 12:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Support Support Complete support. Filipe RibeiroMsg 12:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Rui kuhnert 14:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. The Helpful One 14:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Support Support --Jón 17:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Support Support Leefeni,de Karik 20:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - Support, Bjoertvedt need to be logged in to vote.--Pediboi 12:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Support Support-- Bjoertvedt 17:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Support Support Pro. QuartierLatin1968 20:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support Support --Zeljko 20:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Support Support 天使 BlackBeast Do you need something? 20:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Support Support ~ Seb35 22:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Guille.17 Sí not enough contributions--Pediboi 12:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Support Support everything looks good HBR 23:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Support Support --Davecrosby uk 00:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Support Support --Thogo (talk) 01:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --无杨 03:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC) not enough contributions--Pediboi 11:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Support Support I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 03:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Support Support -gildemax 09:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Support Support --Tarantelle 10:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Support Support--Lighterside 16:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Support Support --Reynaldo 18:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Support Support Fred Xavier 19:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Support Support Knows his way around the Wikimedia Projects. Experience and knowledge is key in a situation like this. Support. Marlith T/C 19:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Support Support Davidandrade 20:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Support Support EBY3221 20:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Support Support --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Support Support sure --Nick1915 - all you want 01:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Support Support --Hermógenes Teixeira Pinto Filho 18:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Support Support--ZERBERUS 05:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Support Support --Gdgourou 10:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Support Support Oui Adailton 13:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Support Support Changed from Neutral to Support based on answers and a closer inspection of the ptwiki issues cited by opposers and questions. John Vandenberg 16:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Support Support Has some good cross-wiki experience and is trusted.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 18:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Support Support Thewiikione 03:51, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Support Support Tumnus 09:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Support Support Xenus 14:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Support Support --Baiji --> (Opinión) 16:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Support Support Burmeister 22:46, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I think that you will do good job. -- A2 supersonique 22:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Unegibile voter --Nice poa 01:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Support Support Dobau 23:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Support Support Proofreader77 03:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Snake311 20:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. --Nick1915 - all you want 11:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Support Support --TNolte 02:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC) (sorry for IP, my 'Unified Login' was wrong)[reply]
  96. Support Support fr33kman t - c 03:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support Support --Daniel73480 11:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Support Support [[User:Mateus RM|Mateus RM]] <sup>[[User talk:Mateus RM|talk]]</sup> 16:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Support Support --Nice poa 20:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Support Support IMatthew 20:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Support Support Rizalninoynapoleon 12:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Support Support Garavello 19:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Support Support ok --Rax 22:48, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Support Support No problem O. Morand 00:05, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Support Support Kleiner 14:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    yes. Gustavo Roriz 20:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Uneligible voter. Alex Pereira falaê 23:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support Support --João Carvalho 23:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Support Support --Nevinho 00:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Support Support Nbarth 02:21, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support Support Storkk 03:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Support Support MOOOOOPS 04:41, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 06:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Support Support -- lucasbfr talk 09:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Support Support --4wajzkd02 09:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Support Support--Alborz Fallah 18:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Support Support--Thesupermat 09:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  116. --Mayer Bruno 21:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Support Support Raafael D 01:37, 14 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]
  118. Support Support Gonçalo Veiga 22:23, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Good luck![reply]
  119. Support Support Christian Hartmann 15:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]
  120. Support Support Talk2lurch 21:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Go on![reply]
  121. Support Support Some people say you are already busy with other tasks and conclude that you shouldn't become a Steward. I disagree with them: first, it is you who knows if you can work more or not; second, you are allowed to become a steward, and if it happens, to resign from some other tasks (and you are also allowed to postpone such resignation until you become a steward). Besides, it is great to have a steward from your time zone and with your language skills. Huji 12:32, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Support Support --Fabexplosive The archive man 07:46, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Support Support André Koehne 19:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Support Support --Mardetanha talk 21:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Support Support --Meno25 23:45, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. Oppose Oppose — Aitias // discussion 00:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose Oppose Pediboi 01:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Improper behavior as pt.wikipedia CheckUser as explained here[reply]
    Explained in answer to your question. Alex Pereira falaê 14:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Oppose Sorry but No. Jobcolector. How much more? SysOP, Crat, CU - 9 different jobs until here. This is enough. Marcus Cyron 01:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. ptwiki issues. Prodego talk 05:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Caspiax --Caspiax --Caspiax 10:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter: This user don't have an account on Meta with userpage linked to his homewiki —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 17:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose Oppose I agree with Marcus Cyron. Jobcolector. - Al Lemos 11:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose Oppose Me, too, NoychoH 13:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Oppose Oppose --MF-W 14:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose Oppose I agree with Marcus Cyron. Enbéká 15:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Oppose Oppose No. --RoswithaC 19:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oppose Oppose NonvocalScream 20:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Oppose Oppose Njaelkies Lea 21:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC) The Portuguese issues worry me.[reply]
  12. Oppose Oppose No. --Nrainer 23:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose Oppose — MrDolomite • Talk 15:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Oppose Oppose No. --Andrsvoss 15:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Oppose Oppose No. Agree with Marcus Cyron, too many titles to do. Vinhtantran 03:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Oppose Oppose Hargau 05:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Oppose Oppose Stef48 08:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Oppose Oppose Maedin\talk 13:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Avi 14:27, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Moved to neutral upon receipt of satisfactory explanation -- Avi 17:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Avi, because the summary used by any verification, it's possible to compare user with IPs by logs. Many checkusers have a archive (I have, actual checkusers have, former have) of their verifications, because the tool have a limited time of verification. So, when we have a CU, if applicable, we compare with our archive (obvius, nobody discloses that). I hope have answered your question. Alex Pereira falaê 16:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I will take this to e-mail to preserve the privacy of anyone who may be involved. -- Avi 16:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Oppose Oppose Evidence of canvassing, borderline misuse of checkuser tools per the questions above. AndrewRT 22:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Oppose Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 02:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Oppose Oppose I am concerned about the answer to Q6. Kingturtle 17:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Oppose Oppose Ozymandias 09:04, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Meekohi 22:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible to vote. --Lucas Nunes 01:24, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Oppose Oppose DorisAntony 21:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose Too much access--132.205.110.197 20:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC) IP don't vote. --Lucas Nunes 20:46, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Oppose OpposeMizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 15:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC) - Too much "jobs". Take it easy![reply]
  25. Oppose Oppose--Drboisclair 22:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Oppose Oppose per Marcus Cyron --Wikikids 02:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose per --User: Valid 02:19, 12 February 2009 sorry, you must to be logged to vote. --Nice poa 08:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Oppose Oppose per Marcus Cyron. I think it's almost impossible to hold all of these positions! --OrsolyaVirág 18:26, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Oppose Oppose per Marcus Cyron. Khoikhoi 23:41, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. Neutral Neutral perhaps all OK, but someone mentioned ptwiki issues and I think you have enough roles ... --Smihael 11:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Waiting on answers to questions related to ptwiki. John Vandenberg 14:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment Comment - What happneed in pt.wiki? In end of 2008 one of the CheckUsers resign, and only Alex and other user done the CheckUsers, in the same time, pt.wiki have a lot of sock puppets and dispurtives accounts in this time (PédiBoi is one of them), and we have a time whit 5, 6 CheckUsers at the same time. It's complete normal that Alex, whit so lot of work, have put in analissis the wrong CheckUser (He apologise after that). Béria Lima Msg 12:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral Neutral Waiting for answers on questions 4-8, will vote opposed if questions are not answered by the last day. Leujohn 09:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral Neutral Punx 09:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Neutral Neutral I am satisfied with the explanation. Thank you, Alex, and good luck. -- Avi 16:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutral Neutral ...Aurora... 11:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Neutral Neutral Not sure how to vote on this one. Both sides have good arguments. Razorflame 04:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Neutral Neutral --Sampi 20:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Neutral Neutral Too pt centric Carsrac 23:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

Apteva

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. Support Support because otherwise it's impossible to indent the line below properly, and that makes my vote-checking bots not work. ST47 19:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Caspiax--Caspiax 10:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible for voting: the user don't have an account on Meta with userpage linked to his homewiki. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 17:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]
  2. Support Support --Zeljko 23:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. Oppose Oppose No. You have not mentioned anything relevant to stewardship in your summary. Gak 08:51, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose Oppose No, If you are not willing to sign what you write. Fenrisulfir 01:05, 3. February 2009 (UTC)
  3. Oppose Oppose — Aitias // discussion 00:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose Oppose Imho the user has not enough experience, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Abdullah Harun Jewel 01:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 01:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sorry, I don't believe you have enough experience. Have you thought about en:Administratorship though? With a little work, that might be better. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by NuclearWarfare (talk) diff, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    You just voted two lines up... ST47 20:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NuclearWarfare (talk • contribs) diff, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC). ;) --Thogo (talk) 14:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose Oppose Puntori 00:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Oppose Oppose Mr.Z-man 00:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose Oppose --Thogo (talk) 00:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Oppose Oppose no. Micha L. Rieser 00:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oppose Oppose I think you should be familiar with your home project first before running for Steward. miranda 00:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Oppose Oppose No Udufruduhu 00:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Oppose Oppose Inexperience, haven't really explained what you'd do with the Steward bit and you were blocked back in October on en-wiki, can't support sorry. Matt (Talk) 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose Oppose Az1568 (talk) 00:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Oppose Oppose No. Not a word about the stewardship. This user seems to think it is all about en-Wikipedia what we are talking about, but stewards shouldn't do anything (or ver very little) on en-Wikipedia. We are talking here not about the Wikipedia-project, but about the Wikimedia-project, a small difference in words, a very big difference in practice. Romaine 00:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Oppose Oppose No/いいえ. --Taichi - (あ！) 00:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Oppose Oppose Sorry, but No - what do you want? Marcus Cyron 01:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Oppose Oppose --Kanonkas 01:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Oppose Oppose Not enough experience.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Oppose Oppose per some of the issues mentioned above. macy 01:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Oppose Oppose, inexperienced. — neuro(talk) 01:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Oppose Oppose --FollowTheMedia 01:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Oppose Oppose --Ivan Štambuk 01:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Oppose Oppose --Tomatejc 02:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Oppose Oppose bibliomaniac15 03:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Oppose Oppose--1j1z2 03:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Oppose Oppose --Revolus Echo der Stille 03:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Oppose Oppose No. Prodego talk 04:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Oppose Oppose—『Skjackey tse』 04:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  29. Oppose Oppose --Sir James 05:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Oppose Oppose Avjoska 06:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Oppose Oppose Achates 07:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Oppose Oppose --Shipmaster 07:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Oppose Oppose Matema 08:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Oppose Oppose Sorry. Sebleouf 08:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Oppose Oppose --Vd437 08:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Oppose Oppose --Brownout(msg) 09:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Oppose Oppose Against monolingual stewardship. Man77"..."(de) 10:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Oppose Oppose --Church of emacs 10:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Oppose Oppose Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Oppose Oppose Doesn't show understanding of what stewardship is. Jon Harald Søby 10:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Oppose Oppose --AFBorchert 11:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC) apparently no experience and no knowledge of foreign languages[reply]
  42. Oppose Oppose Vyk 11:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Oppose Oppose --KRLS 11:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Oppose Oppose are you joking? --Smihael 11:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Oppose Oppose only using a username when necessary - stewards use a username more than when necessary'. The Helpful One 11:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Oppose Oppose Against monolingual stewardship (especially english speaker). VIGNERON * discut. 11:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Oppose Oppose Béria Lima Msg 11:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Oppose Oppose In my view, stewards on EN Wikipedia should speak English as their first language. Also this user cannot be praised (if that if the right word) for the edits he has made via an IP account as we cannot tell for sure whether this user made those edits. Also user has not had enough experience. Manadude2 12:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Oppose Oppose --Florian Adler 12:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Oppose Oppose sorry axpdeHello! 12:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Oppose Oppose —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 14:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Oppose Oppose --MF-W 14:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Oppose Oppose Stewardship has little or nothing to do with enwiki. Stifle 14:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Oppose Oppose John Vandenberg 14:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Oppose Oppose Obelix 14:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Oppose Oppose Obelix 14:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Oppose Oppose Enbéká 15:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Oppose Oppose Jdrewitt 16:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Oppose Oppose Japiot 18:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Oppose Oppose À cause du manque d'expérience avec les outils d'admin. / Lack of experience with admins' tools. --Edhral 19:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Oppose Oppose Seems to be very little active (less than 50 edits in 3 monts) even in his home wiki — NickK 19:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Oppose Oppose Obviously not nearly enough experience. Majorly talk 19:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Oppose Oppose Saloca 20:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Oppose Oppose –Ejs-80 20:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Oppose Oppose NonvocalScream 20:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Oppose Oppose No. Razorflame 21:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Oppose Oppose Njaelkies Lea 21:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Oppose Oppose No, a strong one. --Nrainer 23:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Oppose Oppose Needs language skills. --Shizhao 01:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry.You aren't expert enough.Try next years.Good luck. --Rangond 06:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 19:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Oppose Oppose ~ putnik 08:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Oppose Oppose --Uwe Gille 09:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Oppose Oppose This is obvious. User doesn't even remotely have the prerequisites to become a steward. --FiliP × 12:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Oppose Oppose Filipe RibeiroMsg 12:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Oppose Oppose GlassCobra 14:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Oppose Oppose — MrDolomite • Talk 15:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Oppose Oppose Contra. QuartierLatin1968 20:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Mmmmm.... WT...? I don't think so.- 天使 BlackBeast Do you need something? 20:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Against monolingual stewardship (especially english speaker) Enst38 23:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Oppose Oppose Against monolingual stewardship (especially english speaker), too HBR 23:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Oppose Oppose --Davecrosby uk 00:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Oppose Oppose Mailer Diablo 03:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Oppose Oppose Stef48 08:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Oppose Oppose Alex Pereira falaê 12:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Oppose Oppose Don't think he has enough experience.--Lighterside 16:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Oppose Oppose Tiptoety talk 20:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Oppose Oppose Sorry, but IPs cannot become stewards. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Oppose Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 02:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Oppose Oppose Not very active, and monolingual Gonzolito 11:15, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Oppose Oppose Experience? ...Aurora... 11:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Oppose Oppose Very Strong Oppose Only using account when nessaccary? I'm doubt if this user even knows what accounts are for, let alone stewardship. Leujohn (talk) 13:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    The candidate later made a statement on my talk page:
    "When I wrote the statement "only using a username when necessary, or to participate in discussions", I was referring to the past, and it is written in the past tense. For what it is worth, the only reason I segment my contributions is because I am only willing to contribute to WP under the condition of anonymity, something that would be extremely unlikely if I did not segment them. Fortunately Wikipedia has a very good privacy policy, but that is only half of the equation. And yes I know that IP editing is far less anonymous than using a registered username. However, most of my 5 to 10 thousand edits are as an IP user, so I see no reason to change now. You know, I make so many edits, that when I put in a website, and have to solve the captcha, not only is the first word often something that my browser recognizes, I have seen both words before sometimes (in that same order). Apteva (talk) 23:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)"
    Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Leujohn"
    which proves that this candidate is stubborn and will not change whatsoever. I have completly lost faith to the candidate to even be an admin. I beg that you read carefully over this message before casting your vote. Leujohn (talk) 10:37, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I really do not like to comment on votes, or answer questions asked here - there is a questions section for that, but I would suggest carefully reading especially the section above that is highlighted (not by me) - "I see no reason" - bear in mind that I make many changes, and follow the principle "change what needs to be changed, keep what needs to be kept, and have the wisdom to know the difference", which is a paraphrase of the en:Serenity Prayer. Tenacious would be a better word to use than stubborn, but clearly only when there is a good reason. Otherwise it is equally clearly better to just move on. Apteva 16:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Oppose Oppose Ozymandias 09:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Oppose Oppose -- (cypsy) 09:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Oppose Oppose a joke ? --Gdgourou 10:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Oppose Oppose Sorry, do not think you are qualified. --Captain-tucker 02:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Oppose Oppose Not qualified. -download | sign! 05:57, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose --Snake311 20:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. --Nick1915 - all you want 11:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Oppose Oppose speaks only english. Kafka1 21:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose Seems to be too inexperienced. --Tauwasser 02:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must be logged in, have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 02:47, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Oppose Oppose --Tom 02:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Oppose Oppose Strongest possible This user does not seem to understand what is required from a normal contributor let alone someone with extra responsibilites such as a steward. fr33kman t - c 03:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Oppose Oppose Juliancolton 03:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Oppose Oppose --Daniel73480 11:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Oppose Oppose IMatthew 20:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Oppose Oppose - Not nearly enough experience crosswiki PseudoOne 03:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Oppose Oppose --Liangent 10:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Oppose Oppose --DorisAntony 11:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Oppose Oppose ts --Rax 22:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC) btw[reply]
  106. Oppose Oppose Contributing mostly anonymously is not serious enough to become a steward. It is impossible for me to check what you have done or not on Wikipedia. O. Morand 00:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Oppose Oppose No way. I still oppose your use of 2 accounts and a dynamic IP range to contribute (on the same range of subjects). -- lucasbfr talk 23:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Oppose Oppose Inexperience, misunderstanding of steward role. Nbarth 01:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Oppose Oppose Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 07:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Oppose Oppose No experience, no relevant contributions, misunderstanding of steward role, unwilling to sign, etc. Mkruijff 15:13, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Oppose Oppose--Drboisclair 22:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Oppose Oppose --4wajzkd02 09:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Oppose Oppose--Thesupermat 09:18, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Oppose Oppose English only. Maedin\talk 19:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  115. --Mayer Bruno 21:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Oppose Oppose-- Harrywad 23:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Oppose Oppose seems fair, but lack of language skills imminent --Höyhens 02:50, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Oppose Oppose he is definitely not stewardship material--Sampi 04:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Oppose Oppose [[User:Christian Hartmann|Christian]]<sup>[[User talk:Christian Hartmann|msg]]</sup> 16:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Oppose Oppose You haven't said what you are going to do mainly with the steward tools. Techman224Talk 01:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Oppose OpposeNatanaeel83 20:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Oppose Oppose Masti 21:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC) you don't want to edit under your nick you have a problem[reply]

Neutral

  1. Neutral Neutral GOOD LUCK! Although it seems you have little chance this time NoychoH 13:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral Neutral Punx 09:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral Neutral I'm not sure that you are ok for become a steward this year. -- A2 supersonique 22:55, 6 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

avjoska

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. OK, why not. Marcus Cyron 01:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --FollowTheMedia 01:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Gereon K. 01:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Sir James 05:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Vd437 09:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Support because of ru-2 — Iguacu • !? • ru 09:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --StSasha 09:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Да[reply]
  8. --Church of emacs 10:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --AFBorchert 11:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC) as he would become the first steward who speaks Estonian[reply]
  10. --MannMaus 11:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Александр Сигачёв 12:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Ahonc 14:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Support --tiuks 14:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support - ru-2 will be useful. LexArt 14:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 19:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Support, it looks okay. — Albert Krantz¿? 15:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]
    Good. Rangond 07:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 19:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Support Andres 09:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Dr Oldekop 11:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 00:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support Szalakóta 14:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support Wouterhagens 16:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support Roquai 21:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support --WikedKentaur 06:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support - Punx 09:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support Support – Epp 00:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Support – Szater 17:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support – Stellar Grifon 18:44, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Support --Zeljko 23:15, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Weak Support Support -- Bence My Talk 17:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support Support --Dj Capricorn 12:07, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support Support -- Eug 11:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Support Multilingual. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 18:01, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support Support good cross-wiki activity. I don't think you'll succeed this time round however! fr33kman t - c 03:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support Support--Daniel73480 11:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support Support--Jusjih 22:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Support Support -- Lelandrb 22:28, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. ok --Rax 22:55, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Support Support Respects the conditions and seems serious. O. Morand 00:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support Support: Is experienced in many languages. -- Maseltov 12:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support Support A steward who knows Russian and Estonian and who seems to be trustworthy must be a net benefit, even if they only do a little. As far as I know, Avjoska being elected wouldn't squeeze out a (perhaps) more worthy candidate. Maedin\talk 20:00, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support Support --Höyhens 02:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support Support Good and useful knowledge of languages. --Nurtsio 09:24, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. Oppose OpposeNo. Why apply to be steward if you are only planning to do the work when other stewards are off? Gak 12:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. — Aitias // discussion 00:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Thogo (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Imho the user has not enough experience, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Puntori 00:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. no. Micha L. Rieser 00:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. No Udufruduhu 00:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. No. We already have to much little active stewards. We want much active stewards. Romaine 00:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Oppose Oppose, inexperienced. — neuro(talk) 01:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Inexperience + the statement about (in)activity concerns me. Matt (Talk) 01:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Oppose. Prodego talk 05:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 05:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Achates 07:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Stewards need to be active, there no value to the community to support someone who has already express an intent of being inactive Gnangarra 08:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Brownout(msg) 10:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Fruggo 10:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Oppose, per statement. Jon Harald Søby 10:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Njaelkies Lea 11:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Oppose Oppose Vyk 11:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Oppose Oppose per I do not expect to be a very active steward - we need more active stewards. The Helpful One 11:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. only active stewards, please axpdeHello! 12:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 14:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --MF-W 14:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Kanonkas 14:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Oppose due to intent of inactivity. --Nahum 14:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Filipe RibeiroMsg 14:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC) "I do not expect to be a very active steward, I apply for this status because that might occasionally dilute the other stewards' workload somehow" sounds me like a "I want a term-buffer"[reply]
  28. Obelix 15:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --RoswithaC 19:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. NonvocalScream 21:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Jan eissfeldt 22:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. No/いいえ. --Taichi - (あ！) 03:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Uwe Gille 09:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. we need active ones --FiliP × 12:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. GlassCobra 15:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Oppose Oppose — MrDolomite • Talk 15:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Contra. QuartierLatin1968 20:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --Davecrosby uk 00:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Mailer Diablo 03:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Stef48 08:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Oppose Oppose Hoping to assist by aiming to simply reduce other stewards' work load is not enough commitment.--Trevor Marron 10:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Alex Pereira falaê 12:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Oppose Oppose Not committed enough --Lighterside 16:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 02:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Oppose Inactive steward ?? Gonzolito 11:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Oppose due to not responding to queries about activity level for next year. John Vandenberg 17:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Meekohi 22:45, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 00:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Oppose Oppose Don't need inactive steward Darkxsun 01:50, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose --Snake311 20:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. --Nick1915 - all you want 11:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose Only casual activity is not enough to be a steward imho. --Tauwasser 02:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must be logged in, have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 02:47, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. IMatthew 20:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Oppose Oppose - Sorry, if you want to be a steward you should be an 'active' steward. --Captain-tucker 14:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Intention of inactivity. Nbarth 01:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Oppose Oppose--Drboisclair 22:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Oppose Oppose --4wajzkd02 09:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Oppose Oppose--Thesupermat 09:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Oppose Oppose-- Harrywad 23:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Oppose Oppose -- Masti 21:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC) sorry, we do not need inactive stewards[reply]
  57. Oppose Oppose --Techman224Talk 02:19, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. Intend to be inactive? ...Aurora... 11:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Intend to be inactive? I would say that there would be no reason to give you steward rights if you're not going to use it, but the rest sounds good, so I'll plop myself here. Leujohn (talk) 13:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. nothing against him but i don't understood his motivation --Gdgourou 10:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Mayer Bruno 21:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

Avraham

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. Yes Alex F. 10:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  2. Support Support — Aitias // discussion 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Support —DerHexer (Talk) 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Support --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Support Sceptre 00:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Support Yes. Razorflame 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Support Already ID'd to the foundation, so this is just a matter of expanding his workload. NuclearWarfare 00:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Support --林勇智 01:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  9. Support Support Udufruduhu 00:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support Support Sure, second and final candidate that I will support. —CyclonenimT@lk? 00:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Support yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support Have known Avi for a long time and he is definitely fit for the job. -- Ynhockey 00:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Support Matt (Talk) 00:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Support Az1568 (talk) 00:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Support don't see a cause against. Marcus Cyron 01:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support --Ivan Štambuk 01:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support Nishkid64 (talk) 01:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support — neuro(talk) 01:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support shirulashem 01:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support --Shizhao 01:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support Support --Revolus Echo der Stille 03:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Support More workers are needed. --Millosh 04:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support MBisanz talk 04:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Based on support of several very active stewards, and a general trust of the user. Prodego talk 04:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Support Avjoska 06:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support Support Hermann Luyken 07:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support Support Gnangarra 07:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Support "I am present on Meta, and although eligible, have never submitted an RfA on Meta out of respect for the understanding that the tools are meant to be used" I'm agree with that. Otourly 09:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support Support --DR 09:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support Support Computerjoe 09:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support Support --Wing 10:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Support Support --Church of emacs 10:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support Support Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Support Support --Hatukanezumi 10:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support Support Seems to be trusted. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 10:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support Support Yes. Alefbe 10:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support Support →Na·gy 11:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support Support Njaelkies Lea 11:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Support Support Rudget (talk) 11:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Support Support Tinucherian 11:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support Support The Helpful One 11:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support Support sounds acceptable ;-) axpdeHello! 12:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Support Support Davemustaine 13:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support Support --Ahonc 14:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support --Steve94 15:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 16:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support Support Yes. Stifle 14:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Support Support Obelix 15:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Support Support Certainly trustworthy. Rje 15:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support Support-- Bence My Talk 16:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  49. Support Support Yes. bastique demandez! 17:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Support Support. Trusted user. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 20:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Support Support NonvocalScream 20:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support Support I trust Avi. Steve Crossin Talk 20:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Support Support --Nemo 21:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Support Support TheNeon 21:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Support Support Rspeer 21:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Support Support Someoneinmyheadbutit'snotme 22:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Support Support after thorough review of his contributions. The Relativity of The Truth 22:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Support Support Philippe 23:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support Support FayssalF 02:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Support Support Definitely trustworthy. Orderinchaos 03:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Support Support Looks good. faithless (speak) 05:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Ryan Postlethwaite 09:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Support Support Jaranda | wat's sup 14:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Support Support Szalakóta 14:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support Support JoshuaZ 16:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Support Support Avruch 17:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Support Support Kushal one 18:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Support Support Pro. QuartierLatin1968 20:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Support Support Nave.notnilc 22:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Support Support Avi's a good guy (except for those darn smileys), and knows where his towel is. I've worked with him as an admin and CU on en:wp, and like his approach. He has two strikes against him if you read the opposes, experience on other wikis, and language. Language is hard to fix, but in general the other wiki experience can be fixed. My generic advice for it is: Come over to Commons, there's lots of work to do there, and you'll find people from all around the world, many who don't speak English as their first language... you'll demonstrate that you can (or can't) work in a multicultural environment, and that you can get the support of your colleagues. Now then... Avi HAS come over to Commons, he's got a lot of edits... and what's more, he's been a sysop for a year. Commons:Administrators/Requests_and_votes/Avraham_(2nd_attempt). I think he will have to work hard at the job to overcome the barriers of experience and language, but if he does (and I know he will) he'll be a fine steward. Avi, if you don't pass this year, help out more, help the small wiki team, get global rollback, get more active still at Commons, and try again. ++Lar: t/c 22:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Support Support --Davecrosby uk 00:27, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Support Support --Egmontaz 01:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Support Support Per Lar.--chaser - t 05:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Support Support Stef48 08:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Support Support - Punx 09:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Support Support --Lighterside 16:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Support Support after a private talk. Thanks, Avi. Alex Pereira falaê 17:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Support Support --.snoopy. ✉ 19:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Support Support good and reasonable Wikipedian. Carlossuarez46 20:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Support Support --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Support Support You undersold your second language indeed! - Mailer Diablo 23:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Support Support I recognize him from his excellent track record on en. A fine choice for steward -- Samir 01:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Support Support — Rlevse • Talk • 02:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Support Support Telaviv1 15:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Support Support OK. --Goodmorningworld 15:41, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Support Support Kingturtle 17:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Support Support Language evidence has changed my vote. RyanGerbil10 18:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Support Support Jon513 22:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Support Support Avi is "solid as a rock" and absolutely trustworthy. -- (cypsy) 09:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Support Support ok for me --Gdgourou 10:22, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Support Support Yes we need people to deal with cross-wiki vandalism. Leujohn (talk) 10:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Support Support Filipe RibeiroMsg 13:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Support Support - good work on en, active on Commons. Warofdreams 15:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Support Support Yes ...Modernist 03:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Support Support Xenus 15:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Support Support I'm okay with the candidate. Iss246 15:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support Support Rosiestep 17:06, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Support Support --Roberta F. 18:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Support Support - Eug 11:57, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Support Support Glad to bring up the century for Avi. I've said elsewhere why I trust Avraham. Lar's statement deals well with the main reasons for oppose, and confirms my judgement. NSH001 14:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Support Support --Snake311 20:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Support Support fr33kman t - c 00:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Support Support -- --Zeljko 10:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Support Support--Ziko 12:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Support Support — Coren (talk) / (en-wiki) 15:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support Support --Hardenacke 17:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Support Support IMatthew 21:00, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Support Support--Jusjih 22:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support Support Malinaccier (talk) 00:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Support Support as experienced sysop and cu on en:wp he'll get "experience to speak of in steward areas" (s.b.) quickly --Rax 22:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Support Support no problem, serious motivations. O. Morand 00:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Support Support --Martina Nolte 12:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Support Support per Lar. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Support Support Nbarth 02:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 03:07, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Support Support -- lucasbfr talk 13:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Support Support -- Drboisclair 23:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Support Support --4wajzkd02 09:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Support Support rootology (T) 04:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Support Support--Thesupermat 09:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  121. --Mayer Bruno 21:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Support Support --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:04, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Betacrucis 09:18, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    As much as I truly appreciate your support, I believe you are not eligible to vote in this year's elections, so I am afraid I have to indent your vote. Trust me, I'm as sorry as you are, but rules are rules. -- Avi 15:48, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Support Support As long as stewards has full access to enwiki it's good to have stewards knowing this area well and can follow up in case of misuses. Plus for he language skills. nsaa 16:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Support Support. Good experience, good attitude. Jayjg 22:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Support Support Nothing but positive experiences and observations of this user. IronDuke 04:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Support Support --Sampi 04:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Support Support. Does a great job in all his admin, CU, and Oversight positions. Have full confidence that he'll make a fantastic Steward.--Brewcrewer 05:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Support Support Inspires confidence. -- Tundrabuggy 05:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Support Support --Cerejota 12:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Support Support Great checkuser on en.wiki, I'm confident they'd make a great steward on meta. This flag once was red 15:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Support Support—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Christian Hartmann (talk) 11:37, February 17, 2009
  132. Support Support -- Scrupulous, fair, nice to vote for him while signing off from the project. If not in much else, at least in voting for Avi, one can be useful to wiki. Nishidani 20:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Support Support --Jpgordon 23:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Support Support DVD R W 01:05, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Support Support ~Franchement, il n'y en a pas beaucoup des comme lui... Ceedjee 20:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Support Support Yossiea 15:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Support Support Die4Dixie 22:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Support Support Marlith T/C 00:33, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Support Support . He is an exceptional and caring admin on Wiki! IZAK 03:52, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Support Support For sure! Tiptoety talk 05:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Support Support. Helpful user, and I trust him. He helped me once. W Tanoto 07:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Support Support --Fabexplosive The archive man 07:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Support Support Fritzpoll 09:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Support Support without hesitation. Jakew 10:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Support Support --MPerel 10:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Support Support Good luck! Dorgan 11:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Support Support Speaking as someone who is heavily involved in cross-wiki work, I still don't think there is a problem per se with an excellent contributor who concentrates on en.wikipedia. Dovi 14:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Support Support I know Avi as a very able and responsible contributor to en.wiki Any Wikimedia project will gain by his contributions! Gidonb 15:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Support Support --Yoavd 16:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Support Support --Mardetanha talk 21:37, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. Oppose Oppose No experience to speak of in steward areas - seems primarily based on English Wikipedia. Majorly talk 00:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose Oppose Puntori 00:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Oppose --FollowTheMedia 01:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose Oppose Per Majorly. An excellent en:wiki sysop, but stewards need broader experience. Durova 02:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose Oppose Andre (talk) 03:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose OpposeAgree with Majorly. Giggy 04:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Oppose Oppose --Sir James 05:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose Oppose --Latitude 08:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Oppose Oppose Limited language skills. feydey 11:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oppose Oppose No per FeydeyCarn 12:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose candidate is spamming by mail.Carn 08:22, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Oppose Oppose Per Majorly, Durova et Feydey. -- Nahum 14:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Oppose Oppose --MF-W 14:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose Oppose Sorry, but 16 useful edits to non-English projects does not show an aptitude for steward work, nor exposure to the dynamics of small wiki projects. John Vandenberg 15:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Oppose Oppose Definitely a trusted user (on the English Wikipedia) but as pointed out above, no cross-wiki work. - Rjd0060 15:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Oppose Contra — Albert Krantz¿? 15:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Oppose Oppose Per Rjd0060 --Herby talk thyme 16:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Oppose Oppose Don't seem to be interwiki active --Nux (talk) 16:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Oppose OpposeInsufficient interwiki activity. Jehochman 17:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Oppose Oppose I'm sorry, you simply don't have any cross-wiki experience.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 18:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Oppose Oppose Tim Q. Wells 18:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Oppose Oppose--RoswithaC 19:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Oppose Oppose --Jan eissfeldt 23:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Oppose Oppose Uwe Gille 09:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Oppose Oppose No cross-wiki experience. Tombomp 10:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Oppose Oppose — MrDolomite • Talk 15:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Oppose Oppose - Agree, Bjoertvedt
    Looking for proficiency in two languages or more. - Mailer Diablo 03:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Oppose Oppose Hargau 05:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    as Mike says. Alex Pereira falaê 12:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC) change my vote. Alex Pereira falaê 17:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose While excellent in EnWiki, more experience in international areas and other languages is necessary for the job. Marlith T/C 19:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Upon further inspection, I take back my opposition. Marlith T/C 00:32, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Oppose Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 02:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Oppose Oppose Per Majorly. ...Aurora... 11:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    No. 148.225.101.3 18:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please log in to vote, thanks. Majorly talk 02:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Oppose Oppose Tesi1700 18:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Oppose Oppose After 6 days of thinking, I've decided that I have to oppose this. Experience is just an issue for me. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Meekohi 22:46, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 00:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)(|1000 4 20 24 46 106 119 121 1000)[reply]
  32. Oppose Oppose --Anthony Ivanoff 17:16, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Oppose Oppose A meta-steward should have more crosswiki experience and language skills. EdBever 18:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Oppose Oppose No, per Majorly and John Vandenberg. His meta involvement seems to be limited into voting concerning about English Wikipedia rather than steward-related cross-wiki issues. --Aphaia 18:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Oppose Oppose per Majorly Bogorm 15:58, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Note User is indefinitely blocked in project where user has the edits for sufferage, for what it is worth. -- Avi 00:07, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Oppose Oppose Experience only in English projects. Sp5uhe 10:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Oppose Oppose. Not a lot of cross-wiki experience. OhanaUnitedTalk page 14:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose. More cross-wiki experience is required--132.205.110.197 20:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC) IP don't vote. --Lucas Nunes 20:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry but I think there are other candidates that are more focused on multiple wikis and languages. -- lucasbfr talk 09:43, 11 February 2009 (UTC)switching vote per my misunderstanding of the election process. -- lucasbfr talk 13:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Oppose Oppose per Majorly--Wikikids 03:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Oppose Oppose-- Harrywad 23:34, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Oppose Oppose because candidate is using edit summaries for campaigning. /Pieter Kuiper 23:05, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    comment but only on his own user page, nothing much wrong with that (except maybe a bit OTT) NSH001 08:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Oppose Oppose en:wiki only expierence :( Masti 21:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. Neutral Neutral Vyk 11:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral Neutral --Smihael 11:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral Neutral Don't know him Patio 14:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Neutral Neutral I trust Avi but I don't think this is the role for him. WJBscribe (talk) 00:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutral Neutral If it's only going to be CU requests, then no. Otherwise, not a bad candidate. --FiliP × 12:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I trust this user greatly, but Stewards need to be multilingual. RyanGerbil10 18:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Changing vote per new evidence. RyanGerbil10 18:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Neutral Neutral - Agree with WJBscribe. Juliancolton 00:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Neutral NeutralNatanaeel83 20:48, 18 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

Dorgan

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. Support Support --Thogo (talk) 00:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Support yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Support --Pataki Márta 00:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Support Yes. Marcus Cyron 01:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Support --Ivan Štambuk 01:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Support bibliomaniac15 03:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Support --KeFe 03:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Support We need more brave persons in stewards team. --Millosh 04:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Support -- Peti610 05:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support Support --Sir James 05:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Support Avjoska 06:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support Achates 07:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Support Misibacsi 07:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Support --Sóhivatal 08:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Support --Marci1994 08:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support Sebleouf 08:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support Hunyadym 09:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support --Zimmy 09:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support - Pilgab 10:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support --Wing 10:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support Support Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Support --Istvánka 10:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support →Na·gy 11:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Support --RedMosQ 11:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Support --Xxxx00 11:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support Support --MannMaus 11:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support Support Bennó 11:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Support --Beroesz 11:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support Support --VC-s 12:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support Support --Teemeah 12:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support Support ----Korovioff 13:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Support Support --Hkoala 14:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support Support Por supuesto! Ya necesitábamos alguien de Hungría. ;) --El Mexicano 14:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Support Support --Ahonc 14:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support Support Stifle 14:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support Support -- Nahum 14:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support Support We need a Hungarian speaker steward: to investigate a case, it is essential to do it in the original language. I trust him to do a good a job. Karmela 14:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support Support --Burumbátor 15:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Support Support Obelix 15:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Support Support Cassandro 15:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support Support --Enbéká 15:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support Support --Csanády 15:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Support Support Rje 15:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support Support Dani (vita) 16:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support Support Alensha 16:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Support Support iAlex 17:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Support Support  – Glanthor ※ 20:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support Support --Nemo 21:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Support Support TheNeon 21:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Support Support --Jan eissfeldt 22:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Support Support Sí/Yes/はい. --Taichi - (あ！) 03:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support Support faithless (speak) 05:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Support Support --Saltinbas 05:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Support Support --P@d@w@ne 08:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Support Support — Winston 09:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Support Support 문제없음--Kwj2772 09:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Support Support --Uwe Gille 09:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Support SupportSeems suitable. --FiliP × 12:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support Support Data Destroyer 12:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Support Support --Lily15 13:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Support Support -- Mami 14:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Support Support Szalakóta 14:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Support Support GlassCobra 15:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Support Support — MrDolomite • Talk 15:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support Support Wouterhagens 16:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Support Support. LaraLove (User:Jennavecia on my home wiki.) 19:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Support Support - Support, Bjoertvedt
  68. Support Support Al Lemos 20:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Support Support Pro. QuartierLatin1968 20:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Support Support ~ Seb35 22:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Support Support --Davecrosby uk 00:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Support Support I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 03:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Stef48 08:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Support Support--Alexander Leischner 09:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Support Support --Susulyka 09:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Support Support - Punx 09:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Support Support Tuohirulla 11:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Support Support I like his answers to the questions, too. Maedin\talk 13:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Support Support --Lighterside 16:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Support Support--Szilas 18:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Support Support --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Support Support He is determined, diligent and experienced enough to become a great steward! 200% YES!!! --OrsolyaVirág 09:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Support Support --Opa 13:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Support Support --Pakos 14:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Support Support Kingturtle 17:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Support Support Daderth 20:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Support Support --Mdavid89 20:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Support Support ~ Boro 21:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Support Support --Kriszta67--Kriszta67 22:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Support Support Caiaffa 03:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Support Support --Ben1979 09:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Support Support ok for me --Gdgourou 10:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Support Support OsvátA 12:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Support Support Filipe RibeiroMsg 13:43, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Support Support Funatic 14:33, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Support Support Buda 14:43, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support Support Diaby 15:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Support Support --Church of emacs 16:08, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Support Support John Vandenberg 17:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Support Support – Szalax 20:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Support Support — told Stewe 21:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Support Support Attis 22:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Support Support --Eintragung ins Nichts 14:51, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Support Support Rosiestep 17:08, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Support Support --Roberta F. 18:22, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support Support --Mdönci 18:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Code page problem, his eligible. See his contributions on HuWiki. Dorgan 15:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Support Support --Kralizec! 01:16, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Support Support Hunadam 16:02, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support Support -- --Zeljko 10:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Support Support --Daniel73480 11:04, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Support Support IMatthew 21:00, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Support Support --Jusjih 22:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Support Support --CsGábor 22:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Support Support --Cinik 20:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Support Support --DorisAntony 21:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Support Support ok --Rax 23:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Support Support OK Somebody working for Ferenc Liszt Music Academy cannot be a bad guy. Seems to have the required qualities to apply. O. Morand 00:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Support Support Ok Support Support - User:Kossuthzs. 07:46, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Support Support --Antissimo 18:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Support Support --Orange.man 18:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Support Support OK - Rendben van;) Hajrá! --Madura Máté Email talkstreet 19:24, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Support Support--Bapti 19:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Support Support Nbarth 02:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Support Support Storkk 03:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 07:23, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Support Support: Why not. -- Maseltov 12:14, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Support Support --Diligent 19:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Support Support --Drboisclair 23:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Support Support --4wajzkd02 09:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Support Support--Thesupermat 09:21, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Support Support----Texaner 12:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Support Support --Einstein2 18:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  133. --Mayer Bruno 23:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC
  134. Support Support -- Harrywad 23:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Support Support - Burrows 09:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Support Support Andrzej19 17:17, 15 February 2009 (UTC) Let him try.[reply]
  137. Support Support Christian talk 23:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Support Support --Fabexplosive The archive man 07:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Support Support -- Hidaspal 22:13, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Support Support --Mardetanha talk 21:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Support Support -- Avi 23:40, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Sorry, doesn't seem experienced enough. Majorly talk 00:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Puntori 00:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. No. I miss the words about you being present on Wikimedia/the projects and what you are intented to do. You are based on some projects, which is very nice, but that isn't so much what stewards do. Romaine 00:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose Oppose — neuro(talk) 01:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FollowTheMedia 01:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Mr.Z-man 02:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Revolus Echo der Stille 03:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Prodego talk 04:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Not enough experience. - Lolsimon 10:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Oppose Oppose Vyk 11:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --MF-W 14:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. 100% No.--Gothika 15:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. I'm sorry, I don't think you have enough experience.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 18:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. NonvocalScream 20:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. per Majorly, lack of experience--Nick1915 - all you want 11:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Hargau 05:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. per Majorly. Sorry. Alex Pereira falaê 12:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. per Majorly. Definitely does not have the experience necessary to be a steward at this time. Maybe try again in the future? Cheers, Razorflame 20:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Oppose Oppose No. Tesi1700 18:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:15, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Oppose Oppose. Sorry but I think you lack experience in the field. -- lucasbfr talk 09:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Oppose Oppose per Majorly. --Wikikids 02:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. what about cross-wiki?JALK 10:46, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Oppose Oppose Lack of concern about canvassing. --Apteva 03:46, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    He did answer to you prior your vote. - Xbspiro 10:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    For what it is worth, his answer to both of our questions did not meet with my satisfaction. Just answering a question with a question is not ever likely to be satisfactory, and calling canvassing flattering was not what I was expecting. Apteva 13:36, 19 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]
  26. Oppose Oppose per experience concerns. Khoikhoi 23:41, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. Neutral Neutral No information on what user intends to do as steward. Gak 12:51, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Udufruduhu 00:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. ...Aurora... 11:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Neutral Neutral --Tauwasser 02:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutral Neutral Leujohn (talk)
  6. Neutral Neutral I have trust in this user and someone who speaks fluent Hungarian would erase the language barrier between HuWiki and stewards. However I don't see why he needs to be a steward to encourage other users (see his answer at q2). Also, I have concerns about the propaganda on HuWiki which goes in favour of him. If my questions remain unanswered, then this neutral vote will turn into opposal. - Xbspiro 11:47, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Hahó, Xbspiro. I can't speak on behalf of anyone else but as I see the candidate is well-known and respected in the wiki segments which I frequent. Is that an answer? I don't see a point in the main argument on this page against Dorgan, and I hope that you will not oppose him either. --Korovioff 20:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    It is barely an argument with only one side speaking, however Dorgan promised me via e-mail that he will answer soon. So, I am waiting. I do not want to affect his answer with further comments. However I have to make it clear that all I wanted was to point out the weak points in his statements and comment on the banner of Huwiki of steward elections. I have offered him a chance to correct them, so I assume that a fast response from the candidate of the highest eligible rank would be gentle. Such a delay (one week in the case of my original questions) is not what I expect. - Xbspiro 13:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I have had a talk with the candidate via MSN recently: my vote will remain neutral. He will soon post his answers here. - Xbspiro 23:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Neutral Neutral — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Masti (talk) - Xbspiro 11:13, 19 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

Erwin

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

ja WOBE3333 11:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 16:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Lolsimon 00:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Experienced global rollbackers should be fine in this role. Majorly talk 00:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. NuclearWarfare 00:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Mr.Z-man 00:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Kanonkas 00:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Cbrown1023 talk 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Az1568 (talk) 00:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support Support Udufruduhu 00:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Herr Kriss 00:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Sí/Yes/はい. --Taichi - (あ！) 00:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Yes. Knows where he should use the stewardship for. Romaine 00:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Kalan ? 01:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Yes. Marcus Cyron 01:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Ivan Štambuk 01:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Erwin does excellent work with spam and vandalism, is consistently level-headed, and takes a collaborative approach, which I particularly like.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Nishkid64 (talk) 01:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support — neuro(talk) 01:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --FollowTheMedia 01:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Shizhao 01:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. bibliomaniac15 03:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Revolus Echo der Stille 03:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. More workers are needed. --Millosh 04:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Wutsje 04:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Sir James 05:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Avjoska 06:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Eddylandzaat 07:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter: The user don't have an account on Meta with userpage linked to his/her homewiki. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 17:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Support Gnangarra 08:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Redlinux 08:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Sebleouf 08:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Vd437 08:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Euku 08:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Kameraad Pjotr 09:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Dr. Gert Blazejewski 09:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. ken123 09:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC) ;-)[reply]
  36. --StSasha 10:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. yeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaa --.snoopy. ✉ 10:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --Wing 10:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Willemo 10:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Ja. Jon Harald Søby 10:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Fruggo 10:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Béria Lima Msg 10:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support Support--Konsnos 10:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Lockal 11:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Njaelkies Lea 11:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Support Support Vyk 11:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. MannMaus 11:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Plenty of experience. feydey 11:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Good candidate. Jóna Þórunn 12:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Adnergje 12:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. oscar 12:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. --Florian Adler 12:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Forrestjunky 12:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. EUDOXIO 12:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. support axpdeHello! 12:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. MoiraMoira 13:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Durdane 13:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 16:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Cenarium (Talk) 13:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Multichill 14:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Annabel 14:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 14:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. --Lucien leGrey ( m | es ) 14:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. --MF-W 14:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Support Support --Ahonc 14:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support Support --Patio 14:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Support Support - Chrism 14:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Support Support - Alter Fritz 15:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Obelix 15:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Support Support - Ulflarsen 15:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Support Support --Garfieldairlines 15:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. --Fabexplosive The archive man 15:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Erwin is a very experienced candidate and has shown that he is capable of carrying out the duties of the role. Rje 15:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Very competent cross wiki worker, should be fine. --Herby talk thyme 16:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Basvb 16:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Support Support iAlex 17:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Does fine things We El 17:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter: The user don't have an account on Meta with userpage linked to his/her homewiki. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 17:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Jehochman 17:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Japiot 18:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Tim Q. Wells 18:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. -- Bryan (talk|commons) 18:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. --Jan Luca 18:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Dolledre 19:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Xenus 19:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Support Support — NickK 19:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Mwpnl 19:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. –Ejs-80 21:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Support Support - .Koen 22:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87. TheNeon 22:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Support Support Chris 22:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89. --Jan eissfeldt 22:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Support Support --Kjetil_r 23:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Support Support --Nrainer 23:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Support Support Meursault2004 23:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93. John Vandenberg 00:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. --Thogo (talk) 00:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Support Support, yepyep. IJzeren Jan 00:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Support Support Sunray 06:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support Support Alefbe 07:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. ~ putnik 08:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. --P@d@w@ne 09:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100. --Uwe Gille 09:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Seems sane->Support Support.--Alnokta 10:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Sure --FiliP × 12:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Support Support Brinkie 12:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC) see userpage for link to other usernames/projects[reply]
  104. Jaranda | wat's sup 14:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Szalakóta 14:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support Support --OosWesThoesBes 14:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107. GlassCobra 15:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Support Support — MrDolomite • Talk 15:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support Support Migdejong 16:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Support Support -- Lychee 16:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Larzzz 16:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112. ZX81 talk 18:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113. --S.Didam 19:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Support Support. LaraLove (User:Jennavecia on my home wiki.) 19:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Pro. QuartierLatin1968 20:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Support Support --Marvin 101 21:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  117. ~ Seb35 22:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Support Support Pharaoh of the Wizards 23:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  119. --Davecrosby uk 00:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Timmyishappy 01:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 01:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  120. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 03:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Stef48 08:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Support Support - Punx 09:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Alex Pereira falaê 12:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Support Support Kingturtle 13:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Support Support Lutz Terheyden 15:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Support Support --High Contrast 18:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Support Support James F. (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Tiptoety talk 20:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  129. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Support Support Stewards should be like this.--Cerejota 04:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Support Support Of course ! Gonzolito 11:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  132. ...Aurora... 11:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Support Support - RobSchop 18:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support - --Ulanwp 09:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote. Please see Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters. --Meno25 00:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Support Support perfect profile :) --Gdgourou 10:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Pjetter 12:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Support Support, good admin. ~Innvs: 12:26, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Support Support --Jorunn 12:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Filipe RibeiroMsg 13:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Oui Adailton 13:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  140. --Church of emacs 16:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Support Support Absolutely!Prashanthns 18:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Strong Support Support based on direct experience of his good work on Meta. --A. B. (talk) 22:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Support Support - seems fine to me. Cheers! BD2412 T 05:02, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support seems good. --Odesub 12:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote. Please see Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters. --Meno25 00:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Toby001 13:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Support Support Rosiestep 17:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Art Unbound 23:28, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Proofreader77 02:29, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Support SupportYou are the right candidate for Steward,Best wishes!! --Jigesh 09:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Support Support Eug 12:04, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Support Support EdBever 18:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  151. --Aphaia 18:49, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support --§ Snake311 (I'm Not Okay!) 20:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. --Nick1915 - all you want 11:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Support Support --Daniel73480 11:05, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Support Support Poco a poco 11:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Support Support --Ziko 12:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Support Support. Yes! Looks like you have sufficient experience needed for stewardship. —Jamie☆S93 14:48, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Support Support Yes, of course!! Davin 15:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  157. IMatthew 21:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Malinaccier (talk) 00:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Support Support --Liangent 10:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Andrzej19 12:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  161. ok --Rax 23:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  162. According to his contributions and purposes, I consider I can be confident in him. O. Morand 00:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Support Support Sp5uhe 10:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Support Support aleichem 11:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Support Support Enormekever 13:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Support Support Looks Good! --Captain-tucker 14:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  167. --alexscho 15:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Support Support Good luck!--Larno Man 22:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Support Support Pevernagie 22:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Nbarth 01:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Storkk 03:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Support Support -- lucasbfr talk 09:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support -- SvonHalenbach 14:07, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote. Please see Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters. --Meno25 00:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thats true. I am sorry, should have read the guidelines before. --SvonHalenbach 11:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Support Support --Diligent 19:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Support Support - Kaare 19:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Support Support - Drboisclair 23:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Support Support --4wajzkd02 09:46, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Support Support --MarkusZi 19:26, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  178. Support Support--Thesupermat 09:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Support Support Maedin\talk 20:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  180. --Mayer Bruno 23:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC
  181. Support Support --ysangkok 23:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Support Support -- Harrywad 23:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Support Support --Höyhens 03:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Support Support Tjako 16:41, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Support Support Yes, sounds perfect for the job.--Sampi 04:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Support Support Techman224Talk 01:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Support Support [[User:Christian Hartmann|Christian]]<sup>[[User talk:Christian Hartmann|msg]]</sup> 23:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Good candidate.[reply]
  188. Support Support --Paul B 23:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Support Support Great background! --OrsolyaVirág 17:47, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Support Support -- suits the job. Huji 20:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Kwj2772 (論) 14:44, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  192. Support Support --Mardetanha talk 21:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. No. Razorflame 00:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Puntori 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I have no idea who you are, and I feel like I should. Prodego talk 05:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. neen. — Albert Krantz¿? 15:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose Oppose Guido den Broeder 19:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 01:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Excuse me? Since when is a SUL account obligatory? I have made thousands of edits, and am not blocked here. Guido den Broeder 15:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Restoring my vote in view of [1]. Guido den Broeder 18:18, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. NonvocalScream 20:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. No. Tesi1700 18:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose I think you don't have sufficient experiences to be a steward.--Kwj2772 (論) 12:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]
    Switched--Kwj2772 (論) 14:44, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral Neutral --Tauwasser 02:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

EVula

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. Support Support Well written statement. Gak 12:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Captain panda 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Meno25 00:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Lvova 00:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Cenarium (Talk) 00:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Support Definitely has my vote. Cheers, Razorflame 00:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Support IMatthew 00:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Support Definitely. —CyclonenimT@lk? 00:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support Support I hope you win! --Aguilac 00:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Support trustworthy. competent. fair. Kingturtle 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support — vvv 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Aleksandrit 00:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. BJTalk 00:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Support ShapiroS10 00:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support Willking1979 00:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. I consider you to be a good candidate and I don’t know why are all these people don’t like you that much. — Kalan ? 01:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. American Eagle (talk) 01:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support nsaa 01:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Shizhao 01:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. I don't agree with everything that he says, but he is dedicated and knows the job. Ottava Rima 02:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. I trust him and have seen his actions and that all that matters for me. Prashanthns 03:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Sir James 05:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. I trust EVula, very much so. also, I have to point out that, contrary to your English nom, you are a b'crat on en.wikipedia. Foxy Loxy en: 08:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Daniel (talk) 09:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. of course --.snoopy. ✉ 09:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support Support — Numerous positive interactions with EVula. — RyanCross (talk) 10:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Support --WIKImaniac 11:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  29. Support Support Cirt (talk) 12:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support Support Great track as a crat and admin.Trust the user fully. Pharaoh of the Wizards 16:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support Support Yes.Perfect Proposal 19:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Support Support 100% Yes. HereFord 19:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. NonvocalScream 20:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Evula has my trust. Steve Crossin Talk 20:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support Support. Trustworthy. Philippe 23:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Strong support - lots of experience on smaller wikis, especially in languages other than English. John Vandenberg 00:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Like where? Majorly talk 00:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    My largest non-English projects are the Portuguese, Polish, and Italian Wikipedias, where I've done a lot of work lately in linking up to new articles that roll out of the Simple English Wikipedia. I've also done significant work (and is likely what John is referring to) on the Korean Wikisource (of which I'm very proud), mapping out their author pages and author categories and linking them up with the rest of the projects (something that the bots don't do, since there's not much for them to "hook" into). Also on Wikisource, I did a massive update to s:en:Template:InterLanguage-AuthorsByLetter,[2] which is a sizable template used to automatically manage the author sorting categories on more than a dozen editions of Wikisource (and also meant that I had to create the template on other language editions [3][4][5]; again, also something the bots can't handle).
    It's edits like these that prompt my boasting of being able to operate in numerous foreign languages, despite the fact that I can't speak these languages. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I understand what you're saying, EVula, but it'd be my conjection that the tasks that stewardship presents often require more than just being able to operate on multilingual projects and that interlingual communication is essential to the role. Stewards are meant to, after all, fill the wishes of the local community precisely and effectively and an ability to accurately comprehend requests is what allows stewards to do this. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh, I get that; trust me, I don't fault anyone that cites my lack of foreign language comprehension as a reason for opposing my stewardship. However, in my opening statement, I highlighted the places that I intend to focus on as a steward; all of them involve being able to operate on multilingual projects, which I can do and is why I think I'd be a particularly efficient steward. One of the stewards I most respect in the role, Lar, manages to do quite well, despite being "only de-1". EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    The Wikisource projects have historically been spawned from Old Wikisource and go on their own way. Sadly Multilingual Wikisource has not had standards like the Incubator does, so these projects started with only a few pages and no structure, and there has not been any where near enough coordination between the diverging projects. Many of the smaller wikisource projects have not developed infrastructure like the bigger projects, such as "Author" pages and templates, or copyright and deletion tags. What is worse is many of these projects dont have an active community. This is a significant problem that affects the entire Wikisource project, as the English project relies on the other sub-domains to host the works that were originally written in other languages. If the Estonian Wikisource sub-domain is not sufficiently developed and documented, it becomes impractical for the original Estonian works to be added to the appropriate Wikisource sub-domain, often resulting in the English Wikisource being a dumping ground for text of all languages. As a result, English Wikisource admins are often confronted with pages that need to be moved to another project, and often the language isnt known, so we need to identify which language the text is written in. A few of the Wikisource team has been slowly bringing the sub-domains together by documenting their infrastructure at oldwikisource:WS:COORD, developing the missing infrastructure and interlinking the sub-domains (especially the project pages). EVula has joined in this meta project. I have also done a lot of this work, so I know that it takes a good appreciation of languages. It often involves working with people with English as a second language. It is not merely "operating" on a different language project -- it is understanding and building the infrastructure in another language, and working closely with people whose primary language is not English. This can not be done with merely automated translation tools - it requires a love of languages and small projects, as a single edit could require hours of research, or many days of networking to find someone competent in another language who is happy to assist with translating and an ability to engage the translator when they have no concept of the context (Wikisource) - this will be especially useful for steward matters when the message to be translated may be sensitive, and so only parts of the message can be given to the translator. For me, there are three main skills required for stewards: experience with small projects, the ability to communicate with people of many cultures and languages without resulting in unnecessary confusion, and experience with the tools. EVula has all three. It is a shame that people competent in two common languages (e.g. en and fr) are considered better suited to the role than a person with one native language who demonstrated a passion and understanding of a very wide array of languages. John Vandenberg 08:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. FayssalF 02:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support SupportI trust what he says--Darkeagle7x 06:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible to vote --Lucas Nunes 16:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Ryan Postlethwaite 09:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Support Support --OosWesThoesBes 14:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. --Wmrwiki 16:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support Support Juliancolton 17:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support Support Has some serious clue, and my respect. Hiberniantears 20:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. The fall (bababadalgharaghtakamminarronnkonnbronntonnerronntuonnthunntrovarrhounawnskawntoohoohoordenenthurnuk!) of a once wallstrait oldparr is retaled early in bed and later on life down through all christian minstrelsy. - Finnegans Wake by James Joyce Synergy 02:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. I think EVula is caught between a rock and a hard place. There are some folk, like me, who will not support a candidate unless they have some significant experience on more than one wiki, and at least one role that requires trust beyond that which we grant to admins. And there are some other folk who will not support a candidate who has "too many hats", fearful that the candidate is out merely to get the bits for show. So they oppose. If EVula had one less permission, would they support him? How about 2 less? 3 less? Then would he lose the support of those like me? It's a quandary. I think instead the question to ask is... is this candidate a good one? Have his roles so far demonstrated he has a deft touch, and lots of clue? If we grant him stewardship will we regret it later? EVula is not the most humble of fellows. He's good at what he does, and perhaps a bit cocky about it too. But who among us doesn't take pride in their work? I know I do. Should EVula know more languages than he does? Yes, it would be good if he did. And so should I! But you can't teach old dogs new tricks. Learning languages late in life is hard. I try my best. I think he will try his best too. Some people will oppose any candidate, no matter how good, if they know only english. Others will oppose candidates who don't speak english well enough to work with other stewards in a common environment (remember, stewardship is a very consultative role) Do we want to cost ourselves someone with enthusiasm and skill over the language issue? Over the permission issue? I don't know. The opposes think so. Are they wrong? There are some people I respect very highly among the opposes... no they are not wrong to feel strongly as they do. Me, I'm supporting EVula because I think all in all, he'd be a good steward. And if not this year, maybe next. ++Lar: t/c 03:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, as to your point about badge-collecting, I know that I'm not opposing because I think he's showing off, but because I simply haven't seen much usage of the tools he has got, and that makes me question why things would be different in his stewardship. I won't go any further into my views in that regard, but, while I respect his views immensely and he's one of the few left on the projects who has clue, I think the fact that, for example, EVula has made more edits to his Wikisource "admin" page than he has made actual administrative actions on that wiki speaks volumes. Or, at least, it does for me. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm more than willing to admit that my Wikisource participation hasn't turned out anything like I expected it to. This is chiefly because shortly after that I got the sysop flag on Wikiquote, and while I didn't initially expect to do much there (I only ran an RfA because I'd dealt with a ton of disgusting vandalism which had to sit around for a while until an admin came thru), I found there was ample work to be done; in short, I felt more "needed" there. I have, however, tried to do some gadget work on Wikisource (which requires sysop but isn't in a log), but have run into very strange errors with them not working the way they should.
    However, for the record, I've only made two edits to my /admin page since getting the sysop flag. ;) EVula // talk // ☯ // 07:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. I trust EVula, and he's got ideas for the steward toolkit that don't require significant language skills.--chaser - t 05:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Support Support - All my experiences in dealing with him have been overall positive. Kennedy 10:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Alex Pereira falaê 12:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Tiptoety talk 20:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Support Support—I trust EVula. Nihiltres(t.u) 03:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. OK. It's too bad he doesn't speak any language but English. However, it just so happens to be the lingua franca of our age. Unfair advantage? You betcha. --Goodmorningworld 15:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support Support - El tiu Cancho 21:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Support Support --Zeljko 07:43, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Support Support -- (cypsy) 10:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Support Support -- The relevant question when voting, IMHO, should be, "Do I trust this person with the tools?" Based on my interactions with him, I am confident that EVula will not abuse the tools. J.delanoygabsadds 14:08, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Support Support - active on a number of projects, even if they are all English language. Good work on en.wp, and I'm not concerned by the "too many hats" argument - if this is what EVula feels is the logical next step, then that's good enough for me. Warofdreams 15:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --Church of emacs 16:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Support Support It Is Me Here t / c 23:22, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support Support - jni 09:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Support Support OhanaUnitedTalk page 15:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Support Support --Roberta F. 18:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Support Support --Kralizec! 01:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Support Support He is active and trusted. --Wayiran 19:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support --§ Snake311 Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. --Nick1915 - all you want 11:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Support Support Active and trust-worthy, would make a wonderful steward, and would not abuse tools TrevorLSciAct 21:03, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support Support en.wiki's The ed17 00:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Seems like enough experience to be a steward and serve the community well. --Tauwasser 02:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must be logged in, have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 02:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Support Support--Jusjih 22:47, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. ok --Rax 23:18, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Support Support Because of the experience. Sp5uhe 11:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Support Support - Drboisclair 23:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Support Support rootology (T) 04:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Support Support--Thesupermat 09:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Support Support - I think EVula can be trusted with the steward bit. --Cspurrier 01:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Support Support - LaraLove 03:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Support Support --‍‍Komeil 4life 13:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Support Support --Apteva 03:40, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Support Support - Punx 07:47, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Support Support — Aitias // discussion 11:52, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. --Thogo (talk) 00:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Imho the user has not enough experience, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. This might be long, and I apologize for the lengthy statement in advance. First, I think EVula should not be a steward because he has too many roles throughout the Wikimedia Foundation already, such as bureaucrat in en-wikiquote, en-wikipedia, etc. administrator in en-wikipedia, en-commons, etc. This would make him be seen as a "hat collector," in my personal opinion. This could lead to many conflicts of interest. Second, he has no knowledge of other languages. Since the Wikimedia Foundation is a multi-lingual organization, stewards are seen to have some multilingual knowledge. As a steward, you cannot depend on Google and Yahoo Translations to investigate a case or checkuser someone. Third, EVula can be seen as sometimes uncivil to people (i.e. "Hi, I am EVula, and you are not"). This can confuse and frustrate some people who are trying to plead their case. To the general public, Wikimedia/Wikipedia already has a seemingly negative viewpoint as being unreliable and people who are rude. Sorry. miranda 00:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I was going to say exactly the same thing, even though I'm not allowed to vote (despite my over 1,000 article edits on en.wiki) Xasodfuih 00:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Are you sure? Check your eligibility here. NuclearWarfare 00:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sadly, all my edits are after November 1. Xasodfuih 12:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Just wanted to clarify: the "I'm EVula and you're not" line is a Chevy Chase reference. No offense meant, I just found it amusing (and true). EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I can understand why one might consider EVula to be lacking in tact at times. However I am certain it is not out of indifference towards civility and general politeness, so much as it is of his general (for lack of a better word) witty nature; which understandably is misinterpreted at times. Perhaps this might not make him a perfect stewart candidate, but EVula does carry himself with a level of diplomacy when dealing with more official matters (eg. bureaucrat statements on en.wikipedia). Additionally, I don't personally see his candidacy for stewartship as the next logical step up, as he does have significant experience on other Wiki's and I see his adminship/cratship on Wikipedia, Wikisource, etc. as a sign that he can be trusted. I am not eligible to vote in this election, but I feel EVula is worthy of the trust of the <strike?WikiaWikimedia community. That, of course, is my opinion and open to disagreement. Master&Expert 08:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I am sure that you meant Wikimedia community, because we aren't Wikia. :) miranda 23:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Crap... thanks for pointing that out. :D Master&Expert 01:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Reluctant oppose - Per Miranda's first point, and the lack of SWMT or checkuser work. NuclearWarfare 00:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Sorry, EVula, but this time, I cannot support. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm in perfect agreement with User:Miranda. In my interactions with EVula I have found him to be impolite. Also, I have seen him making polemic comments. Thus, I have to oppose regretfully. — Aitias // discussion 00:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. I am uncomfortable with EVula's position on desysopping. Even though EVula, to his credit, makes clear that he is more interested in other activities, since there is considerable push on some wikis to involve stewards more in the desysopping process, I must exercise caution and oppose. Chick Bowen 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Per Miranda´s second point. --Seha 00:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. GlassCobra 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. No. Being a steward doesn't mean you get promoted. Not much about what you are going to do with the stewardship. Romaine 01:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Per Miranda --Ivan Štambuk 01:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Sorry, but no. I don't like these Job-collecting. Marcus Cyron 01:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Oppose Oppose per Miranda. — neuro(talk) 01:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --FollowTheMedia 01:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Puntori 03:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. oppose "as the next logical step" --Revolus Echo der Stille 04:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. This isn't a popularity contest. Giggy 04:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. EVula's general personality isn't real suited to the work a steward does. Prodego talk 04:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Oppose 반대 언어상의 문제.--Kwj2772 05:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC) (en: "Because of the language problems".)[reply]
  18. Achates 07:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. relucantly too many hats Gnangarra 08:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Against monolingual stewardship. Man77"..."(de) 10:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Stewards should speak more than one language (although English is quite helpful of course) and I echo concerns of job-collecting and minor rudeness. Somehow, as much as I appreciate EVula's work, I somehow cannot picture him as a stewart... SoWhy 11:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Miranda makes good points, would have supported otherwise. Rudget (talk) 11:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Per Miranda. feydey 11:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Зачем переводы убрал? --Ahonc 14:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --MF-W 14:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Too many roles, sorry. Stifle 14:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. -- Nahum 15:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Simply because I expect stewards to speak more than one language. EVula is a fine candidate and has done a lot of good work. Rje 16:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Only one language+too many rights. Bence My Talk 16:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  30. Monolingual, already has too many duties in English projects — NickK 19:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Too many hats already and concur with miranda's stance. --Caspian blue 20:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose: (re issues involving an RfB on Simple English Wikiquote); sorry, EVula.
    Misconstruing/misquoting: EVula said "[Coppertwig]...has already stated that they will not close the RfB at all (much less actually perform the promotion)", but I replied "Correction: I did not state that I would not perform the promotion." What I had actually said was here and here. Since the other administrators on the project don't have bureaucrat buttons, I find it hard to see how that can reasonably be interpreted as a refusal to perform the promotion (e.g. after a non-bureaucrat closure). Regardless of what the procedure ought to be, a steward would need to be able to understand communication about this distinction. If it wasn't clear, EVula could have asked me for clarification or quoted me word-for-word.
    Information that didn't pan out (maybe because of the above). EVula said, "the stewards can perform the promotion", but when the request was made a few days later it was turned down by a steward.
    Contradicting themself: EVula said "local non-bureaucrats should never be the ones to close an RfX", but earlier in the same discussion about the same RfB EVula had said "I'm a bureaucrat on several projects and would be happy to close it (despite not being a bureaucrat here)". and [6] "If I hadn't already participated in it, I'd be more than happy to close it". ☺Coppertwig(talk) 22:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)    [reply]
    For the first, that's a breakdown in communication; to me, closing and promoting are the same thing. Your stalwart refusal in the face of the community asking you to fulfill your duties as a bureaucrat is what led to my apparent about-face; when criticized, you remained quiet, and that demeanor came across as contempt for the community (in my eyes). As for the second item, I have to object on the grounds that I cannot be held accountable for there being more than one steward; the folk I asked are not the same ones that promptly said that we had to sort it out on our own (especially since the closing steward pointed out that the SE Wikiquote community had apparently had issues with you being unable to perform your duties in a similar situation in the past, and that it was the community's fault for not resolving the situation then and thereby causing the situation now). EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, it was a breakdown in communication: if that's what happens when you try to communicate about a serious matter in Simple English, I worry about your attempting to communicate with users in other languages. A steward definitely needs to understand that a distinction can be made between closing and promoting (even if only in order to be able to refuse to do so).
    For the second item, I feel that you can be held accountable for giving the impression that a steward would close the discussion; although you did use the word "can" rather than "will". You could perhaps have approached the same steward again rather than posting a general request; or, if you were aware of how stewards usually respond to such requests (as one would hope a steward candidate would be; and which matched how I had expected they would respond) you could have used more words to give a stronger impression of the uncertainty involved. You could perhaps have quoted the steward. What you said, with the word "can", was not necessarily actually false, but was unhelpful to the community.
    If you wish to criticize me, and especially if you would like me to reply to your criticisms, please use my talk page on that project, as I've already suggested, not this page nor any other page devoted to discussions on other topics, where I feel it wouldn't be a good idea for me to take up space with my replies. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 01:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)    [reply]
    Although, except for this one incident, everything I remember seeing you do has been exemplary. I particularly liked some things you said at WT:RfA on en wp. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 00:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Withdrawing my vote. I apologize for taking up too much space on this page and for blowing things out of proportion. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 00:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Jan eissfeldt 22:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Needs language skills. --Shizhao 01:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --Uwe Gille 09:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. No. EVula provides a valuable service on en.wikipedia. Other users are in a better position to provide the time required for Stewardship. Also, this statement seems rather disingenuous: "I am extremely comfortable editing in numerous languages", especially when EVula doesn't explicitly state his lack of language skills. Axl 10:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)(Axl @ Wikipedia)[reply]
  36. Listed only English, but is "comfortable" with many foreign languages? Sorry, but no. --FiliP × 12:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Oppose Oppose — MrDolomite • Talk 15:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Awersowy 19:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Contra. QuartierLatin1968 20:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Oppose Oppose Try to get an XX-2 in any languge, then try again! HBR 23:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Looking for proficiency in two languages or more. - Mailer Diablo 03:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Stewards should speak more than one language. --Pjacobi 11:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Oppose Oppose--Lighterside 16:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Oppose Oppose needs language skills, and from activities on en.wikipedia. Carlossuarez46 20:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Er, what activities on the English Wikipedia? I've never gotten any negative feedback from there; if there's a problem I'm unaware of, I can't fix it without knowing about it. EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Without making more about it than my concerns: your defense of the template {{w:User:Wwagner/Userboxes/Grammar Nazi}} and your negative comments about those who opposed the admin candidacy of a user whose user page was emblazoned with a swastika make me uncomfortable that you understand the depth of hurt such things cause. Carlossuarez46 22:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I didn't defend the template itself, and I never made negative comments about the people who opposed the admin candidate. I did comment that people were objecting to the userbox's existence and then objecting when he removed the box; it was an unfair situation for the candidate. I myself had the userbox for a while, as I'd never received any complaints about it; the moment I got a complaint, I took it down, true to my word. It should also be noted that that all went down more than a year ago; I'd totally forgotten about it until now...
    It's a moot point; the chances of me becoming a steward this year are pretty slim, but I just wanted to clarify that. EVula // talk // ☯ // 23:23, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I didn't want to make a big deal out of it, or cause drama. I only answered your question. Suffice to say, that your use of the userbox is fairly interpretable to defending it, and while you had forgotten the episode, I had not. You're free to respond, but I shall no longer spend time discussing the incident: you wanted clarification and I gave it to you. Pour moi, la question est fermé. Carlossuarez46 00:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Oppose Oppose Vodello 20:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Oppose Oppose-- Steward with only one spoken language? No, please. JAn Dudík 21:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Oppose Oppose Only one language. Gonzolito 11:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Oppose Oppose Lack of language skills and some civility concerns. Epbr123 12:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Chenzw 12:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Insufficient cross wiki experience & a few of the other concerns raised above. --Herby talk thyme 14:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. I'm sorry, it seems you have plenty to do on your home wikis and little cross-wiki experience of the sort I want to see in candidates for steward.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 04:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Oppose Oppose Poco a poco 11:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Oppose Oppose per Ahonc. Speaks only one language and erases links to translations in other. Bogorm 16:14, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I reverted myself at Pathoschild's request; the whole reason they were removed from the template[7] was to get the main page (which had all the statement pages transcluded) down to a decent size, so that users weren't loading a very large page. EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. I don't think you have enough experience to become a steward. You're a great guy, but I'm not sure that being a Steward is right for you. Malinaccier (talk) 00:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Oppose Oppose - Reluctant Oppose - one language --Captain-tucker 15:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. One language, and skills better in multiple existing roles. & Nbarth 01:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Oppose Oppose --4wajzkd02 09:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Too many hats and not enough languages. Angus McLellan (enwiki talk) 12:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. English only, unfortunately. Maedin\talk 20:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Oppose Oppose --ysangkok 22:56, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Oppose Oppose Otherwise seems ok, but lack of language skills imminent --Höyhens 02:53, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Oppose Oppose Just became a bureaucrat. Dusti 06:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Oppose Oppose User hasn't done enough cross-wiki work. Techman224Talk 02:22, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. bibliomaniac15 03:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. For now. Tough choice. flaminglawyerc 05:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Avjoska 06:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutral Neutral Vyk 11:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Tinucherian 11:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Obelix 15:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Neutral Neutral --Taichi - (あ！) 03:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. I respect this user greatly, but Stewards need to be multilingual. RyanGerbil10 18:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Davecrosby uk 00:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Seems to be suited for the job, but is unfortunately monolingual. At least 2 languages (even if they are only -1) would be good. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Has to learn more languages, comfort not really enough - However, I'll leave it to others the decision, because this is clearly a committed wikipedian who otherwise fits the bill.--Cerejota 05:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Language. ...Aurora... 11:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Neutral Neutral PDD 00:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC) BTW some of the opposing votes from German users could be explained by the fact that the next logical step in my cross-wiki contributions is translated as der nächstlogische Schritt in meiner Wikipediakarriere and that this supposed obsession with a wikipedia career sounds rather strange (not just) to German ears.[reply]
  15. Ozymandias 09:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Neutral Neutral some other languages could be great --Gdgourou 10:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Neutral Neutral No real objection, but there is little proof of "comfort with foreign languages" O. Morand 00:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Mayer Bruno 23:06, 13 February 2009 (UTCView vote page

Fabexplosive

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Nemo 00:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --M/ 00:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Experienced global vandal fighter, no issues here. Majorly talk 00:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Support. No problems here. Razorflame 00:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Mr.Z-man 00:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. miranda 00:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Though global sysop would be nicer (I'm surprised that wasn't implemented) NuclearWarfare 00:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Support The Helpful One 00:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Cbrown1023 talk 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Seha 00:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Az1568 (talk) 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Herr Kriss 00:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes/Sí/はい. --Taichi - (あ！) 00:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Change my vote... --Taichi - (あ！) 03:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Kalan ? 01:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Yes. Seems to know what stewardship is for. Romaine 01:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Ivan Štambuk 01:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support --Skyluke ★ 01:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. OK. Marcus Cyron 01:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Experienced cross-wiki vandal fighter - I see no issues whatsoever.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Nishkid64 (talk) 01:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Kanonkas 01:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support — neuro(talk) 01:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --FollowTheMedia 01:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. He has been fighting vandalism since before I joined Meta. hHe is very experienced and has my trust ..--Cometstyles 03:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. bibliomaniac15 03:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Of course. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 04:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  28. --Sir James 05:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Yes bastique demandez! 06:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Avjoska 06:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 07:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Triquetra 08:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Sebleouf 08:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. I'm starting thinking that if we won't support him this time, he will continue to come back every year :P :) --Filnik 09:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Lucien leGrey ( m | es ) 10:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Wing 10:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Sì. Jon Harald Søby 10:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. -- RaminusFalcon «…» («it.wikipedia») 10:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Rastrojo (D•ES) 10:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. →Na·gy 11:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Njaelkies Lea 11:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Senpai 12:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support Support --Broc 12:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support Support --EH101 14:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Yuma 13:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Ivocamp96 14:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --MF-W 14:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Ahonc 14:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Obelix 15:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. trusted fellow, useful in cross vandalism fighting. DarkoNeko 15:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Cotton 15:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Support Support — Albert Krantz¿? 15:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. --Oxymoron83 16:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. --Freed73 18:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --ripe tolc 19:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --Pigr8 20:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. TheNeon 22:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. --Aushulz 03:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --P@d@w@ne 09:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. − Elfix × talk (fr) 10:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Support Support--Nick1915 - all you want 11:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Like last year. --FiliP × 12:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. --Stef Mec 13:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. vvv 13:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Support Support — MrDolomite • Talk 15:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. --Pietrodn · talk with me 18:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Yes :D.- 天使 BlackBeast Do you need something? 20:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Alex Pereira falaê 12:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. --Torsolo 14:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. --Amarvudol 18:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. --Guidomac 18:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. I don't like his involvement in Italian languages issues, but: he is a good candidate, he could pass and we need more active stewards. If elected, I expect from him not to interfere in Italian languages issues. --Millosh 12:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Support Support Kingturtle 18:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Support Support Andcen 23:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Kronos 08:58, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Ozymandias 09:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Support Support ok for me --Gdgourou 10:26, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Bence My Talk 15:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. John Vandenberg 17:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. —Dferg (meta-w:es.) 21:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Sirabder87 21:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Support Support --Wayiran 19:48, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support --§ Snake311 (I'm Not Okay!) 20:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. --Nick1915 - all you want 11:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. yes. notafish }<';> 20:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. ~Support SupportGustavocarra 11:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Si è mostrato degno per il suo bel lavoro.[reply]
  87. --Turgon the dark side of a normal user 19:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  88. ok --Rax 23:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Seems convenient, no problem O. Morand 00:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Nbarth 03:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91. --Gusme 16:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Support Support --Zeljko 08:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Support Support Andcen 16:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Support Support--Thesupermat 09:27, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Support Support Alexander VIII 12:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96. --Mayer Bruno 23:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support Support --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. --.snoopy. ✉ 21:12, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. ~ putnik 11:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Yerul (comlink) 18:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Mike Halterman 09:38, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Роман Беккер 11:18, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103. --Rave 21:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Support Support --‍‍Komeil 4life 13:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Support Support --Màrço 27 (msg) on it.wiki: user page — talk page 13:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Aleksandrit 17:10, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Support SupportNatanaeel83 20:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Support Support - Punx 07:48, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support Support --Grebenkov 18:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Support Support Good luck! - Dorgan 12:39, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Support Support --دانقولا 23:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Support Support--Mstislavl 09:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Support Support --Сдобников Андрей 21:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Support Support -- Avi 23:40, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Puntori 00:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I didn't yet understand Mori's affair (a diffamating campaign against another sysop, Valepert, made up by email in order to obtain Valepert's deflag which he seems to be involved in). I also have doubts about his CU-related knowledge--Vituzzu 00:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Isn't true, only supposition without positive response or evidence of this act. --Fabexplosive The archive man 17:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Can you give us some links which confirm this fact, please? --Pietrodn · talk with me 18:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please Pietrodn don't pretend to ignore what I'm referring to--Vituzzu 23:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please Vito don't pretend that everyone here is an it.wiki's community expert or can just take your word for these allegations. --Nemo 13:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please Nemo don't pretend to be a fireman: Pietro knows what I'm referring to since we said so many times that Fab is involved into diffamating campaign against Valepert, an email was sent to an user who disclosed the fact, maybe it's better to take a look at deflag's page and to see if an user posted there: maybe you wouldn't say to be a community expert but simply to be coherent, and please stop this flame I'm not intrested in--Vituzzu 21:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    If "an user" "disclosed the fact", why don't you link to it? So everyone can see and evaluate the situation. Please provide links, precise information, and diffs. --Pietrodn · talk with me 13:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh it's lovable: to ask for a diff knowing that the requested diff won't mean anything to people who doesn't know the situation o who is not from it.wiki, really lovable--Vituzzu 14:09, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Perhaps because it doesn't actually mean anything, even to people who know the situation and are from it.wiki. This is only a house of cards. --Nemo 18:20, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Questions are unanswered. They should be answered by now. Prodego talk 05:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. I don't trust him enough to have access to checkuser and oversight tools; besides that, he has an history of executing tasks without a clear comprehension of the reasons behind them. --Brownout(msg) 10:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Aqwis 11:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Oppose Oppose Vyk 11:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. I agree with Brownout. --LaPizia 14:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Not ready Helios 14:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. very dangerous user. --valepert 14:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Perhaps it's a language barrier, but dangerous is a pretty harsh word in the English language. Could you clarify how Fabexplosive is "dangerous"? Thanks. Majorly talk 16:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    probably because he has an explosive user name :) :P --.snoopy. ✉ 20:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I think that's not a joke--Vituzzu 23:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Better be safe than sorry. Stweradship is one of the most sensitive jobs and should only be given with absolute trustworthiness. --Nahum 15:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Jehochman 17:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose Oppose Guido den Broeder 19:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 01:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Excuse me? Since when is a SUL account obligatory? Guido den Broeder 15:51, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    He said either SUL or link to the account which is eligible on the userpage, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:55, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    In that, case, I want my vote restored. Guido den Broeder 16:33, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Restored per [8], --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 17:22, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks Spacebirdy. Great tool, btw. Guido den Broeder 18:16, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. No. Alefbe 19:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. NonvocalScream 20:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Oppose Oppose --Nrainer 23:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Uwe Gille 09:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Oppose Strong oppose See The meatpuppeting attack on LMO wikipedia Szwedzki 18:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Béria Lima Msg 18:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Per Vituzzu and Brownout.[reply]
  20. Quoting Brownout. --KS 23:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Hargau 05:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Oppose. --Checco 12:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Oppose Oppose Agree with Szwedzki Gonzolito 11:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Oppose Oppose Quoting Vituzzu. --Rael 00:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Oppose Oppose - Funatic 14:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Oppose Strongest oppose possible per meatpuppetery incident on LMO Wikipedia. OhanaUnitedTalk page 15:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Oppose Oppose. Per The meatpuppeting attack on lmowikipedia. --Lucas Nunes 23:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Oppose Oppose, seems not trustful enough. --Wikikids 03:09, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Oppose Oppose Something doesn't seem right. Maedin\talk 21:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Oppose Oppose. If he was involved in the meatpuppetery incident behind his back then he didn't act circumspectly. The other possibility is worse. - Xbspiro 15:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Oppose Oppose - I can't make sense of the lmo.wikipedia case. --Jorunn 16:34, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Oppose Oppose - Lombard Wikipedia, a lot of problem with Fabexplosive. For example: http://lmo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Grott/Archivi/6#Analisi_del_comportamento_dell.27amministratore_Fabexplosive. --Dragonòt 16:51, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    (little precisation) I've blocked meatpuppets and trolls in lmo.wiki, some trolls attack me in this page (or "some users troll friendly attack me in this page")... --Fabexplosive The archive man 07:58, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. Neutral. Il ha multo votas contra Fabexplosive, ma io non comprehende pro que. Il poterea esser util que le opponentes explica lor position... QuartierLatin1968 20:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Davecrosby uk 00:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Mailer Diablo 03:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Quoting QuartierLatin1968. --Xinstalker 13:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. ...Aurora... 11:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Neutral - I support this user generally, despite use of global rollback, but cannot support stewardship for that reason. - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Neutral Neutral Per the dispute in lmowiki. --Taichi - (あ！) 03:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

Fadesga

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. Cárdenas 00:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Kriddl 04:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Sir James 05:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --MannMaus 11:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Loudmilka 12:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Support Globalphilosophy 16:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Moral support - trustworthy and friendly. Orderinchaos 03:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. experiece can improve very fast and I also think that newer users deserve a chance JunoArtemis 07:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --P@d@w@ne 09:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Szalakóta 14:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Pmontaldo 18:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 18:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I've just unified muy accounts to achive the requirements.--Pmontaldo 19:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  12. - Support, Bjoertvedt
  13. --Stepri2003 20:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --stoffel0976 05:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Moral support: would like to see this candidate try again at the next opportunity.--Goodmorningworld 22:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support --Anthony Ivanoff 17:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Daniel73480 11:05, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Muro de Aguas 17:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --91.38.252.69 21:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support: Speaks many languages. -- Maseltov 12:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Mayer Bruno 18:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Imho the user has not enough experience, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Puntori 00:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Sorry, not enough experience. NuclearWarfare 00:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. No/いいえ. Usted no tiene una participación activa en la comunidad de la Wikipedia en Español, sólo posee 1 edición en el espacio de nombres Wikipedia. Sólo veo que es un editor de artículos, pero no alguien que demuestre conocimientos y preocupación del engranaje de Wikipedia. / You don't have an official participation in Spanish Wikipedia, only have 1 edition in Wikipedia namespace. I see that you are an article editor, but isn't an user that demonstrate knowledge and worry for the internal structure of Wikipedia system. --Taichi - (あ！) 01:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. No. Nothing about what stewardship really is. There is much more than Wikipedia!! You probably very good in doing the things you do, but those are totally different in what we need as steward. Romaine 01:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Sorry but no. I don't see why you want to becoma an Steward. Marcus Cyron 01:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Kanonkas 01:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Not enough experience at all.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oppose Oppose — neuro(talk) 01:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --FollowTheMedia 01:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. no. macy 01:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. I think you need more experience. Also, you did not answer the questions asked of you, except for 1, you need to be more responsive. Perhaps broaden your activity and try again next year? ++Lar: t/c 02:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Prodego talk 04:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Sebleouf 08:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Brownout(msg) 10:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 14:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --MF-W 14:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Lack of Cross-wiki experience. Try getting locally involved in a few more wikis that may need you, then try again. With your multilinguality, you're gonna make an excellent steward IMHO if you gain more experience first. Maybe next year. -- Nahum 15:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Not enough experience. Enbéká 16:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. User has written only about his experience at ProZ.com, no experience here, so that's not enough to be a good steward — NickK 19:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. –Ejs-80 20:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. NonvocalScream 20:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. À cause du manque d'expérience avec les outils d'admin. / Lack of experience with admins' tools. --Edhral 22:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. ~ putnik 08:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Uwe Gille 09:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. No suitable rationale for becoming a steward. --FiliP × 12:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. GlassCobra 15:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Oppose Oppose — MrDolomite • Talk 15:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Contra. QuartierLatin1968 20:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Davecrosby uk 00:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Mailer Diablo 03:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. per Lar. Alex Pereira falaê 12:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Tiptoety talk 20:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Experience? ...Aurora... 11:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Oppose Oppose Treinta y Tres. - Tesi1700 23:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Oppose Oppose need more experience --Gdgourou 10:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. John Vandenberg 17:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose --§ Snake311 (I'm Not Okay!) 20:16, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. --Nick1915 - all you want 11:16, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Oppose Oppose --Tom 02:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. at first you'll need to be experienced as sysop anywhere on a WP-project - IMHO - sorry --Rax 23:23, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Oppose Oppose Sorry, not enough experience. Sp5uhe 11:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Lack of Wikimedia admin experience. Nbarth 01:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Oppose Oppose--Thesupermat 09:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Oppose Oppose Doesn't seem to understand the role. Shame, too, I like the languages. Maedin\talk 21:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Oppose Oppose Experience from 2007 only --Höyhens 03:15, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Oppose Oppose Sorry, but no experience of admiship is my reason to object. O. Morand 10:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Oppose Oppose Techman224Talk 02:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. Avjoska 06:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral Neutral Vyk 11:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Obelix 15:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutral Neutral --Nrainer 23:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Neutral Neutral Poco a poco 11:58, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Neutral Neutral - Punx 07:49, 19 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

Jredmond (Jim Redmond)

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. Support SupportGak 12:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Jamiebijania 06:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 16:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Lvova 00:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. — Aitias // discussion 00:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Puntori 00:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Support Willking1979 00:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Seha 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Ivan Štambuk 01:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yes for a longtime worker. Marcus Cyron 01:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Nishkid64 (talk) 01:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Support — neuro(talk) 01:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Shizhao 01:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Durova 02:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Support Luisfege 03:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Support MBisanz talk 04:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Avjoska 06:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Vd437 08:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Daniel (talk) 09:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Lucien leGrey ( m | es ) 10:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Rudget (talk) 11:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Scott MacDonald 13:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Ahonc 14:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Spartaz 15:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. bastique demandez! 17:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. I find it hard to expect 20+ essay answers from any candidate. Yes. NonvocalScream 20:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support Support --Kjetil_r 23:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. John Reaves (talk) 00:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. FayssalF 03:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Very trusted and capable person. --FiliP × 12:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you don't meet the voting requirements. —Pathoschild 17:25:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
  31. - Support, Bjoertvedt
  32. -Davecrosby uk 00:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --chaser - t 05:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --Al Silonov 09:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Pro QuartierLatin1968 09:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support Support Kingturtle 13:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support Support totally. —Sean Whitton / 18:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support Support James F. (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Support Support Can be very good :) Gonzolito 11:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support Support Telaviv1 15:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support Support Caiaffa 03:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. yes. --Zeljko 07:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Ozymandias 09:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Yes. Alefbe 14:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Support Support - good work on en.wp, active in simple chores on other wikis. Warofdreams 15:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Church of emacs 16:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support SupportGoodone121 21:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Support Support Wildhartlivie 13:27, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Support Support Bence My Talk 13:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Support Support --Kralizec! 01:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support Support Poco a poco 12:00, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Support. -- AKA MBG 12:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. --Hardenacke 17:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Support Support Badgernet 14:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Support Support--Bapti 19:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Seems to have exactly the right experience. Nbarth 03:05, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Support Support -- lucasbfr talk 09:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support Support Gosgood 14:57, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Support Support -- Alexf 22:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Support Support Long experience + involvment in OTRS. O. Morand 10:38, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. ~ putnik 21:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Support Support - Punx 07:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Support Support Dorgan 12:41, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support Support --Mardetanha talk 21:36, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. Close to no experience in steward areas. Already busy enough on OTRS as it is... Majorly talk 00:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I like what I know of this user, but user did not respond to questions asked. Stewards need to be responsive. With regret. ++Lar: t/c 02:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC) (move to neutral, questions answered, and pretty well too, in my view.) ++Lar: t/c 22:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    per Lar. Giggy 04:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Indented; neutral. Giggy 10:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    You say you have a good level of spanish and you don't translate this in spanish, very bad... --Alexpaintartist 04:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 16:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. per Lar. Prodego talk 04:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Sir James 06:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Sebleouf 08:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. No responses, only reverts in Spanish wikipedia, so no support now. feydey 12:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --MF-W 14:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Per Lar/Majorly --Herby talk thyme 16:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. I'm sorry, I don't see the cross-wiki experience I want to see in stewards.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 18:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Looks like the candidate did not appear even to answer the questions, so he seems to be not very active — NickK 19:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Jaranda | wat's sup 17:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Hargau 05:30, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Per Majorly and Mike.lifeguard. Alex Pereira falaê 12:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Not now. Tesi1700 18:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Anthony Ivanoff 17:28, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Oppose Oppose fr33kman t - c 18:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. in doubt --> no first edits (en:wp) in 2003 but less than 10000 contribs to all projects / sysop en:wp since 2005 but using sysop rights less than 500 times up to now / mh ...
  18. Oppose Oppose--Larno Man 22:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Oppose Oppose per Majorly --Wikikids 03:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Oppose Oppose Reluctantly. Light on languages and cross-wiki experience. Maedin\talk 21:13, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Oppose Oppose OhanaUnitedTalk page 14:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. --FollowTheMedia 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral Neutral Vyk 11:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Obelix 15:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Not enough reasons to oppose, but not enough to support either. -- Nahum 15:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Uwe Gille 09:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Neutral. Responde al questiones, si il vos place! QuartierLatin1968 20:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC) (Vota cambiate a ‘pro’.)[reply]
  6. Candidate had a good reason for not answering before the start, and gave pretty good answers. I still stand by the rest... I like what I know of this user. However I have concerns about experience... perhaps continue doing the good work helping the small wiki team out and try again next year. (this was somewhat the advice I received on my first try in late 2006) ++Lar: t/c 22:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Mailer Diablo 04:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tiptoety talk 20:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. need just a few more experience (i hope next year) --Gdgourou 10:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. ...Aurora... 11:58, 5 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

Kylu

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Kanonkas 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Friendly, helpful, active in steward areas. Excellent candidate! Majorly talk 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Cenarium (Talk) 00:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support. PeterSymonds 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --M/ 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support GlassCobra 00:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Support Yes! Razorflame 00:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. BJTalk 00:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. miranda 00:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Captain panda 00:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support — vvv 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. NuclearWarfare 00:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Thogo (talk) 00:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Support Without a doubt. The Helpful One 00:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Cbrown1023 talk 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support Willking1979 00:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Mr.Z-man 00:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support. Chick Bowen 00:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Seha 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Az1568 (talk) 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Chrihern 16px 00:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 17:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Deskana 00:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Ivan Štambuk 00:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Kalan ? 01:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Sí/Yes/はい. --Taichi - (あ！) 01:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Yes, Seens to know what stewardship means. Romaine 01:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. American Eagle (talk) 01:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Yes. of course. Marcus Cyron 01:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. (+) Hillgentleman 01:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Hell yeah! Nishkid64 (talk) 01:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. On the condition that Kylu continues in her official role as Meta's archive bot. :D In all seriousness, Kylu knows exactly what it takes to be a steward, and will do an excellent job. Highly experienced in cross-wiki matters, excellent judgement and always helpful.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support Support — neuro(talk) 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --FollowTheMedia 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Shizhao 01:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Durova 02:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Fer sure, she is probably one of the few I would vote for :) ..--Cometstyles 02:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Perhaps this year's best candidate. But only if I get a pony. ++Lar: t/c 02:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Support. Yes, a good contributor cross-wikis. -- Mentifisto 03:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Support Support--Luisfege 03:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support Support--1j1z2 03:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Revolus Echo der Stille 04:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. One of the most experienced candidates. --Millosh 04:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Giggy 04:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support Support Obviously. MBisanz talk 04:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Cecil 04:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. With some reservation, but I assume that I will be impressed, as I usually am, with Kylu. Prodego talk 05:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Yes. bastique demandez! 06:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Sir James 06:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Avjoska 06:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Achates 07:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Shipmaster 07:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 07:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Sebleouf 08:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Kwsn 08:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Daniel (talk) 09:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. yeaaaaaaaaa --.snoopy. ✉ 09:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Merdis 09:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. --Brownout(msg) 10:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Microchip08 @simpleWB 10:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Wing 10:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Yes. Alefbe 10:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Da. Jon Harald Søby 10:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. friendly and helpful, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 10:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. →Na·gy 11:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Tak. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 11:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Béria Lima Msg 11:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Support Support--Konsnos 11:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Support Support Vyk 11:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Garden 11:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Rudget (talk) 11:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Support Support Tinucherian 11:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Support Support, VIGNERON * discut. 12:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Support Support Yann 12:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. feydey 12:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. --Александр Сигачёв 12:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. --Scott MacDonald 13:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Orderinchaos 14:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 14:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. --MF-W 14:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Obelix 15:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. -- Nahum 15:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Support Support --Ahonc 15:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Very active in cross-wiki matters and familiar with the stewards "job". - Rjd0060 15:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. trusted fellow, useful in cross vandalism fighting. DarkoNeko 15:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87. --Fabexplosive The archive man 15:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88. --Herby talk thyme 16:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89. A truly excellent candidate. She will make a very effective steward. Rje 16:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Have my confidence Mirgolth 16:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Support Support iAlex 17:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Gurch 17:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93. support. --Ciphers 17:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. First choice. Jehochman 17:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95. -- Bryan (talk|commons) 18:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Support Support — NickK 19:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97. –Ejs-80 20:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. --Caspian blue 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Yes. NonvocalScream 20:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100. One of the best candidates in my opinion. Steve Crossin Talk 21:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. TheNeon 22:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Support Support --Jan eissfeldt 23:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Support Support Very well deserving. --Charitwo 23:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Yes please. John Vandenberg 00:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105. John Reaves (talk) 00:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support - without any hesitation whatsoever - I am sure Kylu will do a great job. WJBscribe (talk) 00:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Support. FT2 (Talk | email) 02:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108. FayssalF 02:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support Support -- Avi 03:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110. faithless (speak) 05:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Support Support Aude 05:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112. ~ putnik 08:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113. --P@d@w@ne 09:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114. --Uwe Gille 09:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Ryan Postlethwaite 09:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Support Support--Alnokta 10:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Support Support yes indeed!--Nick1915 - all you want 10:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  118. An obvious choice. --FiliP × 12:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Jaranda | wat's sup 14:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Note: User is eligible to vote, enwiki account is User:Secret, which was checked with Pathos' tool and passed. The Helpful One 14:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]
  120. Support Support --OosWesThoesBes 14:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Support Support — MrDolomite • Talk 15:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Support Support -- Lychee 16:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  123. definitely. Xavexgoem 16:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Support Support Juliancolton 17:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Ar son Ar son - absolutely 100%. Kylu is awesome :) - Alison ❤ 19:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Support Support. LaraLove (User:Jennavecia on my home wiki.) 20:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Pro. QuartierLatin1968 20:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  128. If i say no, 127 persons will kick me. xD. Well, you have experience. Yes.- 天使 BlackBeast Do you need something? 21:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  129. ~ Seb35 22:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  130. PhilKnight 22:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Support Support --NightMonkey 22:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Support Support Pharaoh of the Wizards 23:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Support Support Werdna 23:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Support Support Absolutely! Eliz81 00:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  135. --Davecrosby uk 00:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Support Support. I, for one, welcome our new Kylu overlords. - Mark 03:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  137. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 04:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Support Support - AnakngAraw 05:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Support Support ShapiroS10 12:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  140. of course. Alex Pereira falaê 12:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Support Support ---Zyephyrus 13:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Strong Support Support, The Wiki honey bee has my vote every day. --Tarawneh 18:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Support Support yes please :) —Sean Whitton / 18:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Support Support James F. (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Tiptoety talk 20:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  146. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Support Support Edwtie 22:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Support Support (I'm fairly new to this, but have spent an hour studying this candidate. Yes.) Proofreader77 23:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  149. By all means. — Dan | talk 01:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  150. YEA! — Rlevse • Talk • 02:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Support Support Matasg 17:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  152. support --Complex 19:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Support Support Caiaffa 03:43, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Yes. No question. -- (cypsy) 10:22, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Support Support --Gdgourou 10:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  156. ...Aurora... 12:00, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Oui Adailton 13:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Duh. J.delanoygabsadds 14:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  159. --Church of emacs 16:22, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Yes...Modernist 04:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Support Support Yes, Kylu cares Sinhala Wikipedia well. Asiri 09:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Support Support (not already a steward?!) Huji 11:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Support Support --Jyothis 13:09, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Support Support Rosiestep 17:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Support Support --Versageek 03:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Support Support Positive interactions. Multilingual. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 18:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Support Support EdBever 18:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  168. --Aphaia 18:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Support - Wutsje 19:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Support Support --Alexmaxbir 23:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Support Support en.wiki's The ed17 00:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Support Support --Tom 02:47, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Support Support Poco a poco 12:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Support Support — Coren (talk) / (en-wiki) 15:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    IS THE BETTER ONE IN SPANISH¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ User:jcimorra Uneligible to vote. --Lucas Nunes 23:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Support Support -- Good at conflict resolution tries to de-escalate tension. Jbolden1517 22:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Support Support -- PseudoOne 22:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Malinaccier (talk) 00:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  178. Support Support --Sageo 01:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Support Support Coyets 14:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Support Support --Finn Rindahl 17:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support --B 20:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC) switched to oppose --B 14:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  181. ok --Rax 23:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Support Support Sp5uhe 11:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Support Support If you want something done, give it to a busy woman. Gak 12:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Support Support Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Support Support--Bapti 19:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Nbarth 01:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Storkk 03:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Support Support --Diligent 19:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Support Support rootology (T) 04:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Support Support--Thesupermat 09:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  191. —Locke Cole • t • c 10:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  192. Support Support — Gosgood 14:59, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Support Support --DorisAntony 21:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  194. Support Support Maedin\talk 21:17, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Support Support --ysangkok 23:01, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  196. Support Support -- Harrywad 23:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Support Support--Cspurrier 01:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sneaky #200 support (pre-indented) Werdnabot 07:34, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  198. Support Support Seems to be the good person for the job. O. Morand 10:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Support Support --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  200. Support Support Grandmaster 08:28, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Support Support Techman224Talk 01:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  202. Support Support - Punx 07:54, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  203. --Kegns 17:15, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  204. - Josette 20:21, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  205. Support Support More languages, more women! Yeah! --OrsolyaVirág 17:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  206. Support Support — Aitias // discussion 11:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  207. Support Support --Mardetanha talk 21:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

— Aitias // discussion 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Great user, does a lot, but does a lot already, and doesn't seem particularly equipped for multilingual coordination (no other languages at an advanced or fluent level.) Andre (talk) 03:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Just as a note, when ever I want something translated from any of at least 3 dozen languages, I seek out Kylu, unless i can find a native or near native speaker. She can puzzle out meaning in so many languages, it's stunning. So obviously I don't necessarily agree. But I'm biased, languages were a weak spot in my own candidacy. I'll say no more but I did want to point that out. Try her sometime, you'll see. ++Lar: t/c 04:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose 반대 너무 자주 기계 번역을 사용해서 의사 소통상에 있어 오해가 생길 수 있다는 게 우려됩니다. 게다가 사무장이 되기에는 경험이 부족해 보입니다.--Kwj2772 05:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC) (+ Kwj2772 (論) 12:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]
    Mmm, Korean: "Too often used against the machine translation could be misunderstanding and communication have to be on is concerned." Damned if there isn't a hidden message here. — CharlotteWebb 19:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    and lack of experience--Kwj2772 (論) 12:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No. Tesi1700 18:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. OhanaUnitedTalk page 23:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    nope, good user, has better things (and more important things) to do--Not politically correct 23:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote. Please see Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters. --Meno25 23:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose --Valid 2:26 AM, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
    Please log in to vote. Daniel (talk) 08:26, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Plus, User:Valid isn't eligible to vote anyways, if you are indeed them. Daniel (talk) 08:27, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. oppose To "assume good faith", forgets to let people know what they should know in order to make informed choices about this person's role on wiki or presence elsewhere. Sticky Parkin 03:08, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Oppose Oppose - per block of Proabivouac. Regardless of the correctness of the block, blocking a user during the steward elections as response to his/her votes in the steward elections while you yourself are a steward candidate is not appropriate. --B 14:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Note that P. did not vote in the election at all. He was blocked for harrassment on a steward confirmation page, by Kylu as she is a regular sysop on Metawiki. This has nothing at all to do with this election. Thanks. --Thogo (talk) 11:54, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, the action does have something to do with this election - it is an inappropriate action where he/she should have recused himself/herself and allowed another admin to take the action. I'm sure there is at least one meta admin who is not currently up for reconfirmation or seeking election. That sends up red flags. Even if you disagree and don't think it sends up red flags, I am entitled to my own opinion. Why are we whispering? --B 14:51, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose Oppose - blocking voters during an election is bad policy and reflects badly on the blocker. -- Robster2001 23:08, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Whether Kylu is up for election or not has exactly nothing to do with whether it was a good or bad block. If one judges the block on its merits (as should be done), I think the conclusion is quite clear: the block is perfectly appropriate. Kylu is continuing her excellent work even while in the vulnerable position of being judged by the community & I applaud her bravery in doing the right thing even in times when it is difficult to do so. We need to have stewards with backbones.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 23:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Mike R 17:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oppose: My experience of Kylu is that she is untrustworthy and acts as an instrument of others before checking her facts. On En-Wikipedia she blocked me "per IRC" and then refused to comment at the ensuing case, while watching others hurl abuse and lies [9], one of her chief supporters being a now banned user. I cannot trust this person. Giano II 16:50, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

View vote page

Laaknor (Lars Åge Kamfjord)

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Kanonkas 00:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. V85 00:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fine for me. Majorly talk 00:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Puntori 00:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Cbrown1023 talk 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Az1568 (talk) 00:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Ivan Štambuk 00:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Kalan ? 01:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Yaroslav Blanter 01:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. -- OK. Marcus Cyron 01:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --FollowTheMedia 01:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Shizhao 01:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Yes. Benefit of doubt, and AGF. Bots do not have much to do with stewards and I hope you will do a lot more than that. We need active stewards and I hope you will become one. Romaine 02:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. bibliomaniac15 03:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Seems like a good candidate. --Millosh 04:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Sir James 06:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Avjoska 06:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 08:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Sebleouf 08:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Scandinavian stewards could be of great use.--Alexvonf 10:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Wing 10:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Ja, uten tvil. Jon Harald Søby 10:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Definitely, a solid user who I believe will do much good as a steward. Njaelkies Lea 10:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. →Na·gy 11:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Béria Lima Msg 11:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support Support --WIKImaniac 11:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  30. Al Lemos 11:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Lhademmor 12:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Good candidate. Jóna Þórunn 12:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --Fredelige 12:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Support Support - Harrywad 13:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Calandrella 14:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Currently there is only one steward who understands scandinavian languages well (Jhs is doing a great job, but it is only good if we get one more scandinavian speaking steward).[reply]
  36. Support Support --junafani 14:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support Support, and thanks for always being helpful :) --EivindJ 14:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support Support --Kjetil_r 14:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Obelix 15:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Of course[reply]
  40. Support Support --Ahonc 15:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support Support - Kindrob 15:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support Support - Always supportive and of great technical ability. --Harald Haugland 15:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Fabexplosive The archive man 15:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support Support Flums 16:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Oxymoron83 16:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Rje 16:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. <flrn> 17:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support Support — NickK 19:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Support Support – Good candidate with, in my opinion, great technical experience. — H92 (t · c · no) 20:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. --Nemo 21:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Support Support Gabriel Kielland 21:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support Support --Nina-no 21:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. ~ putnik 00:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. --Thogo (talk) 00:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Dekimasu 02:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Sí/Yes/はい. --Taichi - (あ！) 03:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --P@d@w@ne 09:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Just like the milk. I Support Support.--Alnokta 10:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Rrohdin 10:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Support Support--Nick1915 - all you want 11:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Uwe Gille 11:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Looks OK. --FiliP × 12:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. JukoFF 12:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Support Support --OosWesThoesBes 14:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. GlassCobra 15:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Support Support — MrDolomite • Talk 15:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Support Support --Mietchen 16:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. - Support, Bjoertvedt - ...selvsagt
  69. Pro. QuartierLatin1968 20:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. --Rave 22:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. ~ Seb35 22:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. --Davecrosby uk 00:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 04:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Support Support, Laaknor is a great guy. -- Atluxity 06:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Support Support --Eivindgh 10:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Alex Pereira falaê 12:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Looks useful - thanks --Herby talk thyme 15:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Support Support BjørnN 15:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Support Support EBY3221 21:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Support Support Pharaoh of the Wizards 22:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Support Support (Acknowledging candidate's highlighting of "global bot rights," and skillset/interests implied. Fine, in the mix.) Proofreader77 23:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Support Support nsaa 16:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Support Support --PaulVIF 17:44, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Support Support Blue Elf 18:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Support Support Caiaffa 03:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Ozymandias 09:08, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Support Support --Gdgourou 10:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Support Support ~Innvs: 12:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Oui Adailton 13:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91. --Church of emacs talk 16:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92. John Vandenberg 17:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Support Support Rosiestep 17:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Support Support Haakon K 17:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Support Support Good wikimedian, has the technical insight as well as the "human touch" needed to help these projects run smoothly Finn Rindahl 01:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Support Support --Anthony Ivanoff 17:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support Support Knowledge of languages. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 18:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Support Support --Saddhiyama 18:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Malinaccier (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Support Support Sankarip 14:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Support Support NerdyNSK 20:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Support Support --Captain-tucker 16:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support --132.205.110.197 20:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC) IP don't vote. --Lucas Nunes 20:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103. ok --Rax 20:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Support Support No reason to say no!--Larno Man 22:09, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Nbarth 01:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Storkk 03:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Support Support -- lucasbfr talk 09:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Support Support --Baiji --> (Opinión) 10:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support Support - Kaare 19:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Support Support --Meno25 00:26, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Support Support --Necessary Evil 02:29, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Support Support--Thesupermat 09:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113. --Mayer Bruno 18:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Support Support Maedin\talk 21:22, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Support Support --ysangkok 22:54, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Support Support I think I can be fully confident in him. O. Morand 10:48, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Support Support per O. Morand Dorgan 11:13, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Support Support per O. Morand --OrsolyaVirág 18:05, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Support Support --Mardetanha talk 21:33, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. Weak answer to question 3. Prodego talk 05:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)`[reply]
  2. --MF-W 14:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. NonvocalScream 21:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose Oppose No. Tesi1700 18:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose Oppose experience Sp5uhe 11:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose Oppose experience only from 2007 --Höyhens 03:01, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Apparently you are a nice person - many of the above have said so & I have no reason to disagree with that. I'm sure you're a great person in fact. However, I don't see the sort of crosswiki experience I wish to see in steward candidates. Language abilities are excellent to see, however, on balance, I don't think you're the best person we could put on the job. Instead, I think this page shows a bland candidate. I suppose bland sells among many, however I prefer to see someone who does work. I don't see anything you're involved in for which the steward tools are needed.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral Neutral — neuro(talk) 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral Neutral Vyk 11:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. ...Aurora... 12:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutral Neutral Poco a poco 12:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Neutral Neutral - Punx 07:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

Leinad

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. One of the new promising and hard working leaders of Polish Wikipedia, with excellent technical skills. Trusted user, very good candidate. Szwedzki 00:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I know Leinad personally, I think he would be very useful and helpful on other Wikimedia projects. Awersowy 00:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Locksmith 00:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Because: hard woriking, always available, very friendly, helpful, and has some tech-skills. Masur 00:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Ivan Štambuk 00:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Yes, why not. Marcus Cyron 01:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --FollowTheMedia 01:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Excellent candidate. Grzegorz Petka 02:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support Support Good candidate. Indu 02:44 , 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  11. Support Support --Cinik 03:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support --Luisfege 03:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Support Extremely helpful, experienced, active and reasonable, knows what's going on around the projects well.--Adi 04:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Support Smat 05:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Sir James 06:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Avjoska 06:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Galileo01 07:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Candidate is well-known on Polish Wikipedia as very solid user.[reply]
  18. Support Support Hulek 07:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support --Wiher 07:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support Louve 08:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Sebleouf 08:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Support PS11 08:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support I have known the candidate for a while and he is definitely trustworthy Pundit 09:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Support Merdis 09:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Adrian 1111 09:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support Support Sp5uhe 09:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --StSasha 10:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC) tak[reply]
  28. ABX 10:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Astromp 10:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Klejas 10:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Wing 10:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. A technically-oriented administrator and bureaucrat, initiator of quality projects at Polish Wikipedia (one of the main drives behind Flagged Revisions, like this extension or not), tester of Mediawiki software and its extensions on the Polish toolserver, interface translator - so definitely knowledgeable in "what's ticking in Mediawiki". I also trust him to do a good job as a steward, especially from the "clockworks" perspective. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Sure. Jon Harald Søby 10:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. ToAr 10:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bukaj 11:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support Support--Konsnos 11:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes. Sproject 11:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Does not have 600 edits before 01 November 2008 Bukaj 11:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --MannMaus 11:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Żbiczek 12:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Trustworthy, reasonable, technically-skilled, alaways available and helpful.[reply]
  40. --Wyksztalcioch 12:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Definitely.--Verwolff 12:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support Support Patrol110 12:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Probably the best candidate for this post.[reply]
  43. Plati 13:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support Support Mat86 13:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support Support Trustworthy. Timpul 13:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Support Support Lonio17 14:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)The best candidate[reply]
  47. Support Support Mo Cuishle 14:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Matma Rex 15:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Support Support --Ahonc 15:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Popieram. Fiskot 15:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. --Fabexplosive The archive man 15:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support Support Paweł Drozd aka --Drozdp 16:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Support Support Dawid Mrożek 16:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Don't always agree with him, but I trust he will be a good steward. Nux (talk) 16:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Support Support Micpol 17:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Support Support Excellent candidate Vertigo12 18:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Support Support Red 81 19:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Michał460 19:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support Support Lukasz Lukomski 20:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Support Support Trambampas 20:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Support Support Very good candidature. Wulfstan 20:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Support Support--Adamt 22:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Sí/Yes/はい. --Taichi - (あ！) 03:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Support Support --Andreasmperu 04:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. faithless (speak) 05:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. "Polak, Węgier, dwa bratanki, i do szabli, i do szklanki." - Pilgab 05:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Delimata 08:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Motic +1 11:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    vote by anon, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 19:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. --P@d@w@ne 09:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Sobol2222 09:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Vuvar1 13:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Jaranda | wat's sup 14:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Szalakóta 14:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Support Support — MrDolomite • Talk 15:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. --Zivax 16:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Grzegorz Wysocki 16:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Support Support Nutaj 18:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Support Support Monopol 19:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. --Ralf Roletschek 20:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. - Support, Bjoertvedt
  80. Support Support Derski 20:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Pro. QuartierLatin1968 20:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. ~ Seb35 22:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. --Thogo (talk) 01:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 04:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Good enough. Hillgentleman 05:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Support Support Michał Sobkowski 11:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87. sure Przykuta 13:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Maedin\talk 13:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Szymon Żywicki 15:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Support Support --Lighterside 16:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Support Support AlexKazakhov 16:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Support Support Kmarius
  93. Elfhelm 19:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Yes. Alefbe 20:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Support Support --Korovioff 20:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Support Support--Raboe001 20:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support Support-- JAn Dudík 21:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Yes, of course support --Omega933 21:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100. of course, Pjahr 11:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Sounds good to me! Vertigo893 13:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Laforgue 15:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Yarl 16:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Support - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Support Support why not --Gdgourou 10:31, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support Support, good ideas. ~Innvs: 12:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107. --Church of emacs talk 16:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108. John Vandenberg 17:51, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support Support Karol007 ✉ 06:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Support Support Gdarin | talk 08:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Support Support Seems good! --HansRoth 10:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Support Support Picus viridis 11:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Maikking 11:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Support Support Rosiestep 17:19, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Support Support and I'm waiting for some necessary help in the future :) Stefaniak 18:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Support Support --Wayiran 19:48, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Support Support Skotos 07:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Support Support --Daniel73480 11:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  119. --Hardenacke 17:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Support Support Dawid86 22:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  121. ok --Rax 20:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Nbarth 01:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Support Support Rain City Blues 03:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Support Support --Diligent 19:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Support Support --Zeljko 08:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Support Support Bartek m0 16:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Support Support--Thesupermat 09:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  128. --Mayer Bruno 18:46, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Wiktoryn 21:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  130. PMG 00:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Support SupportNatanaeel83 21:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Support Support Maire 21:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Support Support - Punx 07:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Support Support - Dorgan 11:10, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Support Support If I support Dorgan, I must support you as well! Your profiles are very similar, it's really funny! :) --OrsolyaVirág 18:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Support Support technicall Reasons --دانقولا 23:21, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Support Support --Mardetanha talk 21:33, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Support Support --Meno25 23:43, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Sorry, doesn't seem very experienced for this. Majorly talk 00:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Puntori 00:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose Oppose — neuro(talk) 01:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Prodego talk 04:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Latitude 08:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. -- ""well known" in the Polish wikipedia? Never heard of him. Not so experienced. No!--Alexvonf 10:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose Oppose Vyk 11:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --MF-W 14:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Obelix 15:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Oppose Oppose per Majorly. -- Nahum 15:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. NonvocalScream 21:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Hargau 05:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. per Majorly. Sorry. Alex Pereira falaê 12:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Oppose Oppose No. Tesi1700 18:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Cross wiki experience? ...Aurora... 12:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Oppose Oppose fr33kman t - c 02:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. I think that the candidate should be more experienced and has more edits beside own pl-Wiki. Andrzej19 12:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Strong oppose Admin LeinaD is member of gruop that is responsible for keeping LGBT articles in polish Wikipedia in fatal, strongly POV state (with Szwedzki, Louve, Pływak, Grzegorz Petka). Any attempt on make these articles more neutral results in ongouing reverts and fast ban, as in my case. Because of his misunderstaning of NPOV — strongly NO. Dobromir Sośnierz
    Insufficient edit count to vote. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 16:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Oppose Oppose per Majorly. --Wikikids 02:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Oppose Oppose -- Harrywad 23:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Oppose Oppose. Khoikhoi 23:42, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. I agree that he's helpful, hard-working etc., but I don't think it's a job for him. McMonster 16:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. dto. --Uwe Gille 11:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Per Majorly, but still seems trusted. --FiliP × 12:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Davecrosby uk 00:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. -- Bence My Talk 18:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Neutral Neutral Poco a poco 12:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Neutral Neutral Experience a bit poor but not a bad candidate. O. Morand 10:50, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. As with Laaknor, I simply don't see cross-wiki experience. You're not involved in anything for which the steward tools are needed. You say you're interested in countering spam and vandalism, yet you've never reported a single domain to the blacklist, nor do you seem to be involved in cross-wiki anti-vandalism. Actually doing things is far better than promises to do them in the future. I doubt you're going to go on a rampage, but I think we can do better.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

Loco085 (Leandro Kibisz)

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

The following discussion is closed: Withdrawn.

Yes

  1. --Abdullah Harun Jewel 01:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 01:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Aleposta 00:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Cárdenas 00:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Frank Schulenburg 00:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Edmenb 00:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Ivan Štambuk 00:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Support Vini 175 01:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Sí/Yes/はい. --Taichi - (あ！) 01:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. -- Marcus Cyron 01:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --FollowTheMedia 01:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Greek 01:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. -- {Netito} 01:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Shizhao 02:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Un excelente usuario de la Wikipedia en español, muy comprometido con el proyecto/An excellent user of the Wikipedia in spanish, very committed with the project. --Tomatejc 03:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Luisfege 03:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Sir James 06:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Avjoska 06:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Dr. Gert Blazejewski 09:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support Great job in OTRS and media information. --Lucien leGrey ( m | es ) 10:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Rastrojo (D•ES) 10:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Góngora 11:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC) He has all my support. Go on, Leo :)[reply]
  23. Support Support Vyk 11:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --MannMaus 11:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Stefan »Στέφανος« ‽ 13:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Patricio.lorente 14:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support Support--Ahonc 15:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Support — Albert Krantz¿? 16:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. es:Drini 18:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Snakeyes 03:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Baiji --> (Opinión) 08:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC) He has a big experience in different projects and he will be a great steward!![reply]
  32. --Lancaster 08:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --P@d@w@ne 09:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Boivie 09:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Un usuario bueno[reply]
  35. --Anne Valladares 12:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support Support - ----Zivax 18:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. -- Lourdes Cardenal 19:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support Support Great user.- BlackBeast 20:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Davecrosby uk 00:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 04:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Gizmo II 18:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Trusty user, and he can learn what he doesnt already know very fast.[reply]
  42. --Kllr1979--Kllr1979 20:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Imho the user has not enough experience, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Per Spacebirdy, more experience needed. Majorly talk 00:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Puntori 00:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Thogo (talk) 00:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. No checkuser or SWMT work. NuclearWarfare 00:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. no. Micha L. Rieser 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. No. macy 01:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Oppose Oppose — neuro(talk) 01:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oppose. Prodego talk 04:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Achates 07:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Brownout(msg) 10:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --MF-W 14:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. As per reasons stated by Neutral voters Miranda et Lar. I believe they are strong enough to oppose. Maybe next year. -- Nahum 15:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Looks like the candidate did not appear even to answer the questions, also seems to be busy now — NickK 19:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. NonvocalScream 21:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Nemo 21:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Uwe Gille 11:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. no experience--Nick1915 - all you want 11:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Not at this point. Later, yes --FiliP × 12:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Oppose Oppose — MrDolomite • Talk 15:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Hargau 05:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Great guy, pero Argentino :), but, as Spacebirdy says, the user has not enough experience. Sorry. Alex Pereira falaê 12:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. I think you are a good user, but this year you would be too busy planning for WM2009. miranda 00:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I disagree about the experience issue raised by the opposers. But you did not answer questions... stewards need to be responsive! Also, agree with Miranda, I expect if you're involved in WM 09, you are going to be very busy. Maybe next year. ++Lar: t/c 02:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sebleouf 08:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. I agree with Miranda--Wing 10:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. 50/50. feydey 12:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Obelix 15:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Neutral. Responde al questiones, si il vos place! QuartierLatin1968 20:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

View vote page

Mardetanha

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. Support Support — Aitias // discussion 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Support —DerHexer (Talk) 00:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Say no to canvassing.[reply]
  3. Support Support --Meno25 00:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --94.121.245.150 00:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)...[reply]
    Please sign in to vote. Majorly talk 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Support Strong support PeterSymonds 00:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Support --Memty 00:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Support --Thogo (talk) 00:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Good candidate. Majorly talk 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Abstaining.[reply]
  7. Support Support — vvv 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Support No problems here. Razorflame 00:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Support A featured user :) Amir 00:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support Support Puntori 00:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Support —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support Look at all those languages and that experience. NuclearWarfare 00:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Support Cbrown1023 talk 00:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Support Mr.Z-man 00:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Support Chick Bowen 00:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support Az1568 (talk) 00:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support Herr Kriss 00:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support Kalan ? 01:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Sí/Yes/はい. --Taichi - (あ！) 01:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Change my vote... --Taichi - (あ！) 03:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Normally to much jobs - but a Steward with these languages would be good. Marcus Cyron 01:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Sorry, but it seems, there are too much problems. Marcus Cyron 12:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support Yes. Seems to know what stewardship is for. Romaine 01:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support Support Nishkid64 (talk) 01:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Support Highly collaborative, excellent experience with cross-wiki vandalism (and now spam too) - overall a very well-rounded candidate.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support — neuro(talk) 01:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Support --FollowTheMedia 01:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Support --Shizhao 02:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support Support Durova 02:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support Support Ruzgar 02:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Support bibliomaniac15 03:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support Support As someone introduced in his work for a year, I may say just the best about him :) --Millosh 04:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support Support Cecil 04:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support Support -- AnakngAraw 04:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Support Support --Ciphers 05:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support Support Yes. We need RTF stewards :) bastique demandez! 06:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Support Support Avjoska 06:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support Support Yes --Shipmaster 07:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support Support Achates 07:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support Support -- Mercy (☎|✍) 08:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support Support For languages. Sebleouf 08:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Support Support ok. User:Elfix − Elfix × talk (fr) 09:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Support Support Otourly 09:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support. I think, it will be very useful to have a steward-polyglot (especially for Turkic Wikipedias). LexArt 10:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 19:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support Support Support Support Anyway, I welcome more non-European tongues onto WM projects. --Hatukanezumi 10:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support Support --Wing 10:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Support Support →Na·gy 11:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support Support Vyk 11:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support Support Yann 11:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Support Support --MannMaus 11:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Support Support --Góngora (T•ES) 12:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support Support feydey 12:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Support Support Need reliable stewards in Central Asian languages, and this user appears trustworthy and has contributed well insofar as my review capacity extends. Good luck. Orderinchaos 14:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Support Support Por supuesto que sí —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 14:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Support Support --MF-W 14:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support Support --Smooth O 15:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Support Support DarkoNeko 15:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Support Support Zil 15:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Support Support --Fabexplosive The archive man 15:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Support Support Mardetanha will be, for lack of a better word, a perfect steward. — Albert Krantz¿? 16:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Support Support ----Erkan Yilmaz 16:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Support Support iAlex 17:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support--هاكلبري فين 17:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    not eligible to vote. Alefbe 17:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support Support--Farzaaaad2000 18:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. SPQRobin (inc!) 18:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Support Support -- TRD 18:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Support Support--Ahonc 19:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Support Support it is very intersting some user expressing their worry about iranian user whom just have small memory about Iran which was in their childhood. i do mean user alefbet and kavehahangar.they both live out of Iran they have mentioned there in their talk pages.so at the end Mardetanha was the really competent admin in Farsi Wikipedia and many other project.--دانقولا 19:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I haven't stated anything about where I live. Alefbe 23:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Support Support --Vusal1981 21:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support Support --Except a block that seemed a little harsh for me, I didn't see any other "bad things" from him. So, I support him. Mrostam 21:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Support Support-- i knew mardetanha from wiki fa, and i know this election will profite wikipedia to move to place that it should be, mardetanha is a good person and i do bleave himNatanaeel83 21:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Support Support --Nemo 21:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Support Support Being a Sysop or Bureaucrat is a bit different in fa wiki. We have too many unsolved issues and complicated problems and no one can solve them easily neither Mardetanha nor anyone else. Every decision will make some users content and the others one angry. I am sure that no one can be elected as a Bureaucrat in fa wiki in near future. I think Mardetanha is a very useful user in Mediawiki projects. He spends his time in front of computer to solve the problems with patience. I prefer to evaluate him with his activities and contributions in whole Wikimedia projects. His is the member of too many projects and even gainig negative point in fa wiki still keep the average above standards. In other sister fa wiki projects he started a revolution and he recommenced abandoned projects. If he weren't a member of fa wiki projects he wouldn't face the opposition. Too many open projects bear too many oppositions and difficulties. Regarding above descriptions his average point is high and he is eligible to help this project more.--Kamix 21:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Support Support i know mardetanha from Farsi Wikipedia and i have worked with him a lot .opposers claim was very funny and ridiculous , mardetanha is a asset on fawiki--Iroony 21:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Support Support He is one of the most active admins in Farsi Wikipedia. There are always a lot of controversies and confrontations in wikifa. It means when an admin acts, say blocking a user, he makes someone feel bad about him. I do not know if there is any policy to ban users recently blocked to vote here, but this is a fact that should be considered when concluding, since some of the users opposed here are blocked recently.--محمد.رضا 22:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Who is blocked? Mardetanha blocked me a few days ago (for three days) and other users and admins considered his act as unjustifiable. His action was cancelled by User:Behaafarid (the only elected bureaucrat of FaWiki), mentioning that there was no reason to block [10]. Alefbe 22:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    It is not just about you. For your case, I was the first one who objected to MardeTanha[11]. As I said there are always lots of conflicts in wikifa and there are just few admins. Among these few admins just few acts in serious cases and others prefer to just block IPs to not get into trouble. My comment here was not aiming to nullify your (and others') vote, but to show the difficult situation of wikifa. By the way, in your case Behaafarid made mistake too by doing wheel war. --محمد.رضا 15:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Support Support --Martin H. 23:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Support Support sure --Jan eissfeldt 23:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Support Support Mardetanha is a valuable contributer in many Wikimedia projects.--ماني 01:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC) (the same as User:Mani1).[reply]
  74. Support Support. My general experience with Mardetanha both on en.wiki and meta has been extremely positive. Khoikhoi 05:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Support Support Mardtanha is a very hardworking editor in Farsi Wikipedia. He has contributed a lot to the sister projects of the Farsi Wikipedia. Yes, he does have some mistakes in his record. But I think it would add to the diversity of the system. He is familiar with what is expected from him as a Steward; he is fluent in several languages, spends a lot of time on Wikipedia projects. Good luck!!! --دوستدار ويکيپديا 09:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Support Support Candidate has technical depth and experience across projects and languages. He's also displayed an appropriate temperament in the face of vindictive opposition.--Shunpiker 09:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Well, he has a high team spirit and a descent derive to improve the wiki projects and a good soul of both sympathy and motivation for helping others. He is a good choice for such a role Alifakoor 10:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)(User is not eligible for this election. -- Shunpiker 03:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]
    Comment Comment It's really sad that some users in fa.wikipedia even try to make Mardetanha's election a "Nationalistic Issue". Some even are going as far as calling people who oppose him "Traitors and low lifes". In other instance Alifakoor even admitted in fa.wikipedia that he is not eligible to vote due to lack of contributions but he DID cast his vote here despite knowledge. These are unaaceptable. I hope respected stewards pay attention to these violations. --Kaaveh Ahangar 20:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Support Support and gl!--Nick1915 - all you want 10:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Support Support --Uwe Gille 11:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. I trust the user. Seems good. --FiliP × 12:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Support Support --OosWesThoesBes 14:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Support Support Szalakóta 14:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Support Support Very trustworthy user with a lot of experience. We need him.-- BlueDevil Talk 15:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Support Support To cancel out these retarded human rights oppose votes. Jaranda | wat's sup 17:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    See my comment Alefbe 18:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Support Support He deserves it. Amirreza 18:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Support Support Support, it is important to cover all linguistic areas. RyanGerbil10 18:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Support Support (re-recasting my vote). Upon further investigation, I conclude that this "anti-fundamentalism" campaign below is just a substenceless propaganda organised by users having personal issues with the nominee. --Ivan Štambuk 19:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    See User talk:Ivan Štambuk for Mardetanha's allegations (to discredit oppose votes), and my comment about those allegations. Alefbe 09:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Support Support I'm a involved in two Persian wiki projects and I working with him for long time, But I didn’t see him doing bad thinking or making wrong decisions. I think mardetanha is a good admin because he didn’t mix friendship with wikipedia policy. He is very good in blocking rude users. Say no to canvassing.--‍‍Komeil 4life 19:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Support Support --Ralf Roletschek 20:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Support Support - Support, Bjoertvedt In spite og the alledged dangers to his life, I support an Irani member of the crew.
  90. Support Support Wojciech Pędzich Talk 20:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC) In spite of the "against votes I'm inclined to sit here for the sake of the cooperation I've been enjoying with Mardetanha.[reply]
  91. Support Support Awersowy 21:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Support Support --Rave 22:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Support Support I feel convinced, so I change my vote. But as said- You should answer/replay here so more people can understand some situations from your home wiki. Vuvar1 22:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Support Support HBR 00:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Support Support --Ali 03:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Support Support Alex Pereira falaê 12:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support Support After thorough thinking and weighing the oppsing arguments, i think he is a devoted wikimedian, a trustworthy one (from my own experience) the 1984-like dangers are exagerated. --Histolo2 14:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Support Support --Mirzali 17:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Support Support, trustworthy, helpfull, active and fair. Has what it takes to be a good Steward. --Tarawneh 18:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Active and persistent. --Ayda D 21:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    does not have 600 edits before 01 November 2008 (has 188).This account is not eligible to vote in the 2009 steward elections. Ali20 wiki 17:46, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Support Support --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Support Support I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 22:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Support Support Very hard call given concerns about the wisdom of giving someone who supports a government with a history of suppressing internet free speech personal data about wikimedia editors; nonetheless I think this is ultimately about trust, and having looked through a few of his contributions, I think I do trust him. AndrewRT 22:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Support Support --HalanTul 23:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Support Support Obelix 23:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Support Support --He is very polite, friendly and professional. Furthermore, he sis very democratic, tolerant and openminded!! I support!!! مبتدئ 00:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    -- Support. --Kamranmirza 00:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 00:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support A candidate I have perceived his competence. --Raayen 01:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    does not have 600 edits before 01 November 2008 (has 493).This account is not eligible to vote in the 2009 steward elections Ali20 wiki 22:38, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support Support Some of the oppose make want to puke Moez talk 02:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Amouzandeh--77.20.69.179 09:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC) please log-in--Nick1915 - all you want 09:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Amouzandeh----77.20.69.179 23:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 23:11, 7 February 2009 (UTC)([reply]
  107. Support Support He is a full time worker, honost and alone man!--تسلیم 12:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Support Support Branka France 12:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support Support --D tom 12:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Support Support --misos 15:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Support Support --Djordjes (talk) 15:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC) (Taking back edit from edit conflict, ref; Millosh 15:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]
  112. Support Support --GerardM 15:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Mardetanha does everything he says he does. He is also a valued contributor to Betawiki. It was his personal involvement that got Commonist localised. Mardetanha has contributed a large amount of images of Iran. To the people who are "afraid" of Mardetanha living in Iran, this type of scaremongering results in a bias that is IMHO completely unacceptable.[reply]
    About the allegation of scaremongering, please see this discussion about an old email conversiation. Alefbe 11:43, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Support Support SpeedyGonsales 15:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Support Support OK. --Goodmorningworld 16:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Support Support--S.sanja 17:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Support Support --Roberta F. 17:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Support Support Evertype 18:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Support Support Nikola 20:15, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support, I like his editions in Persian wikipedia. هرویسپه 21:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    does not have 600 edits before 01 November 2008 (has 0).This account is not eligible to vote in the 2009 steward elections , Ali20 wiki 17:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Support Support, a good candidate. About the issues he has no control over (where he lives); I leave that part up for the Wikimedia Foundations Board of Trustees, as this is something they should figure out, not random comments from people that do not know the candidate. Laaknor 22:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Support Support I know him from Persian Wiki. He is a very responsible and honest person. He has been a great asset for Persian Wiki. I hope that steward's responsibilities does not keep him away from Persian Wiki. --Eh kia 22:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Support Support PDD 01:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Support Support Blnguyen 03:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Support Support Caiaffa 03:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Support Support Mardetanha has very much helped me in meta. Thanks for all. --Irada 10:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Support Support --Саша Стефановић 11:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Support Support ...Aurora... 12:08, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Support Support, our couse. ~Innvs: 12:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Support Support --Zeljko 13:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support The stuff about the Iranian govt accessing his account is paranoid rubbish. I would expect wikipedians to be more informed. -- Gramscis cousin 15:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Ineligible. Maedin\talk 12:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Support Support highky trusted user. abf /talk to me/ 16:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Support Support Strong support - This user has language skills that will be very helpful for stewards, and has had a strong focus on meta projects like the Incubator, Meta and Commons. This user is respected and trusted, and is very familiar with projects of all size (from Sysop of incubator to Rollbacker on enwiki), and all types ('pedia, books, source, quote, 'tionary).
    Please note: Mardetanha has recently written User:Mardetanha/recusal which goes a long way to preventing the account being hijacked, and will ensure that even if the tools do fall into the wrong hands, they will be taken away as soon as they try to use the tools against Iranians. John Vandenberg 18:38, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    If you are commenting about my argument, that recusal doesn't change anything of that argument. See this discussion. In short, the delay between starting the abuse (by him or someone on behalf of him) and detecting it and removing his steward access can endanger real lives of many Iranian users of all Wikipedias, including English Wikipedia and Persian Wikipedia and Kurdish Wikipedia (even if that delay is less that one hour). Please also see this. Alefbe 19:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment Comment Alfbe, I am annoyed at how you scan the yes voters trying to convince them in every way you can to change their vote, you have voted, and you have made your point of view very clear to everyone, I consider running after voters this way a form of harassment. Please stop. --Shipmaster 19:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't comment about votes (I don't suggest anyone to change their votes). I just comment about allegations against me or comments that claim they have discredited my arguments. Alefbe 19:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Support Support--Goldfinger50 21:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 21:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Goldfinger is president of Wikimedia Serbia (but, without SUL account). I added his details at his user page. --Millosh 09:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Support Support Masur 00:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Support Support Red 81 05:49, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Support Support Karol007 ✉ 06:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Support Support Adi 08:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Support Support Gdarin | talk 08:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Support Support --Hoseyn_1 фTдlk 09:06, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Support Support Olaf 09:27, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Support Support Makarczuk 11:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Support Support Mattwj2002 11:54, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Support Support Good profile and opponent arguments are without value --Gdgourou 13:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Astromp 13:07, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Support Support --Jyothis 13:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Support Support Јованвб 13:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Support Support PMG 14:27, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support--Goldfinger50 14:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Vote already counted. --Millosh 14:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC) --Millosh 14:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Support Support as Gdgourou. Matma Rex 17:51, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Support Support Szwedzki 19:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Support Support Although I had some conflict with him, but I think he's great, greater than some other SYSOPs on fa.wiki. --Rooh23 21:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Support Support --Lasta 23:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC) (ex. user Armchoir, SUL in creation) Lasta is my new nick and please control this bullshit which telling me that I can not vote. My vote is valid. Point. --Armchoir 07:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Strong support Strong support Just because he lives in Iran doesn't mean that he won't be a good steward. Some users that voted against him were quite rude. If they think Iran is bad, wait until they pay attention to Afganistan and Iraq!! --Mystiryder 23:59, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 16:54, 6 February 2009[reply]
    Home wiki: enwiki_p ,Total editcount: 1 his account is not eligible to vote in the 2009 steward elections Ali20 wiki 10:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Support Support --Gothika 00:48, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Support Support Tomasz W. Kozłowski 14:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Support Support (+) Hillgentleman 10:03, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Support Support Multilingual. The country one lives in is not a reason not to be a steward. Well-written recusal statement: clearly understands about recusal. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 18:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Support Support Well-involved and friendly user. Good addition to the team, possibly. --Aphaia 18:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  155. I've changed my vote. Bence My Talk 19:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Support Support I'm sysop on fa.wiki. He is active admin on fa.wiki and some negative votes are result of personal problem. unfortunately some users with canvassing tried to disrupt the voting and made propaganda against him. ظهیری 21:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Syed Atif Nazir 23:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    does not have 50 edits between 01 August 2008 and 31 January 2009 (has 26). This account is not eligible to vote in the 2009 steward elections. Ali20 wiki 09:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Support Support Amouzandeh----Amouzandeh 23:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Support Support --Daniel73480 11:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support --Reality006 11:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    does not have 600 edits before 01 November 2008 (has 45).This account is not eligible to vote in the 2009 steward elections. Ali20 wiki 22:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Support Support Poco a poco 12:04, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Support Support Jon Harald Søby 14:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support I am local bureaucrat of Farsi wikiquote and I am one the earliest farsi wikipedia users.I have been working with mardetanha for long time I really think he deserves the bit..--Sajad 15:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    does not have 50 edits between 01 August 2008 and 31 January 2009 (has 18) .This account is not eligible to vote in the 2009 steward elections Ali20 wiki 22:27, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Support Support Bogorm 16:34, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Support Support willing to change my mind and vote; thanks for responding to my concerns fr33kman t - c 17:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Support Support For a good reason. Or maybe a bad one. Or maybe just because I can. Vivaldi 21:27, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Support Support Wiedemann 05:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support --Bonč 20:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    This user does not have 600 edits before 01 November 2008 (has 336). --micki talk 22:33, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support. Чтож не одним английским разделом жива Википедия. ~ 91.77.119.185 22:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Log in to vote. --Millosh 06:16, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Support Support Good candidate --Cinik 08:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Support Support --Mido 08:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Support Support As an experienced user in Persian and English Wikipedia, Mardetanha is the best possible candidate for stewardship I believe. He proves to be a hardworking and fair administrator and is active in many wiki projects such as Persian Wikipedia, Wikiquote, Wikisource, Wiktionary, Wikibooks, Wikimedia Commons, English Wikipedia, Meta, and Incubator. He is the only Persian-speaking administrator on the Wikimedia Commons and the only developer of Persian Wikinews in Incubator. He is intolerant towards trolls, but his friendly character assures a warm welcoming and a fair chance for all users. His active participation, general assistance, and co-founding of "Every Day One Article" project resulted in the rapid expansion of Persian Wikipedia. I feel these great contributive qualities can be found in all administrators, but Mardetanha has proven to be more than exceptional to me. --Wayiran 13:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Support Support : trusty candidate. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Support Support Seems good, not convinced by oppose reasons. Davewild 18:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Support Support : --BF 18:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]
  171. Support Support ok --Rax 21:09, 10 February 2009 (UTC) fo sure: a qualified user / some of the opposing votes and comments made it a difficult decision, but in the end this candidates statement is convincing me [reply]
  172. Support Support Good candidate--Larno Man 22:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Support Support Seems a strong candidate, and central Asian languages useful; as per discussion at User talk:Ivan Štambuk, User:Alefbe seems to be leading a campaign against Mardetanha. Nbarth 02:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 03:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  175. -- lucasbfr talk 09:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Support Support. -- Maseltov 12:36, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Support Support --Axan.bulut 14:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  178. Support Support --Sortilegus 16:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Support Support appalled at some of the contra comments and reasoning for opposition below. --Diligent 19:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Support Support --Eminn 16:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Support Support--Alborz Fallah 18:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Support Support--Thesupermat 09:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Support Support - Eclecticology 18:22, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  184. --Mayer Bruno 18:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Support Support Maedin\talk 21:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Support Support -- Harrywad 23:49, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Support Support --Höyhens 03:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Support Support Working as a wikipedia SysOp (if you obey the rules and try to be natural) always ends in displeasure of users.
    In alefbet's case, most of the fa.wiki users were in disagreement with Behaafarid (bureaucrat)’s opinion and behaafarid entered in a wheel war [12], unblocked user and violated the Blocking Policy.
    About Iranian government's possible actions: they already know who I am, where I live, which sites I visit each day and even whom I date in university!
    By getting more access (and tasks to do), Mardetanha will be less active in fa.wiki. This is the reason I doubt about Strong Supporting him ;) -- Meisam 08:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    To be fair, most of the fa.wiki users were in disagreement with the necessity of a block in the first place (i.e. a note on user's talk page would have worked). Although the ground for the block was somewhat flimsy, Behaafarid went too far by denying that any sort of policy violation has occurred.--دوستدار ويکيپديا 07:30, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Support Support Nersy 11:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Support Support I am a fa.wikisource admin. As I know him HE will be a great asset for wikimedia projects. So I support him.Pedram.salehpoor 20:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Support Support -- billinghurst 07:08, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Razorflame 07:12, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please only vote once 8th vote, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  192. ~ putnik 23:47, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Support Support-- Pastorals2007 11:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC) In my own opinion Encyclopedias are founded to gather information for people, to help people think better and act better. So, by defenition they should be void of personal prejudices or political obssessions. I find the statement "disputes on fawiki, fear that Iranian government will gain his access under torture" in the summary of ‘oppose reasons’ somewhat shocking, and also rather unfair. Such claims are not grounded, and have no direct link to what has been claimed. This is not based on a reliable source to give citations from, it’s just a rough personal obsevation, so hardly universally valid. I do belive that Mardetanha is a great asset for wikimedia project, losing him is obviously wikimedia’s loss![reply]
  194. Yerul (comlink) 18:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Support Support --Stef Mec 19:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  196. Support Support Grandmaster 08:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Support Support Роман Беккер 11:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  198. Support Support Good Luck! ;-) --Filnik 15:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Aleksandrit 17:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  200. Support Support e.c. 21:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Support Support - Punx 07:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  202. Support Support sanchooli --80.191.243.201 11:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  203. Support Support Excellent candidate. Will make a good Steward. --Apteva 14:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Support Support --Grebenkov 18:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  205. Support Support--Xashaiar 18:37, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  206. Support Support --Kanonkas 20:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  207. Support Support I give him a chance. Good luck! Dorgan 20:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  208. Support Support. Strong Support --Kamranmirza 23:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Support Support--mzn:user:فیروز--04:08, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  210. Support Support--Mstislavl 09:35, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Support Support I know the guy quite well and I know he will do the same good job as Darkoneko. Diti (talk to the penguin) 20:55, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  212. Support Support-- Node ue 21:02, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 伊朗民族到了最危险的时候，每个人被迫着发出最后的吼声。起来！起来！起来！[reply]
  213. Support Support --OrsolyaVirág 21:37, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  214. Support Support --Сдобников Андрей 21:56, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  215. Support Support Mardetanha is trustworthy--همان 22:50, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  216. Support Support -- Avi 23:41, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  217. Support Support : As a former admin and bureaucrat of Persian Wikipedia, I believe that Mardetanha can be trusted for the role of Stewardship. Though we never had the chance to work together as admins, but according to my observations his efforts for the neutrality of the content (which is something quite hard to achieve in fa) and raising trust and confidence in users can not be ignored. Apparently he has the support of stewards community, too. Also, I should mention that some of the statements brought forward as support for negative votes, as far as I know are totally out of the real context, tangible to neutral users of fa. I hope as a steward Mardetanha can gain even more trust from the fa community as well as stewards community. --Shervin Afshar 23:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. Strongly Oppose there are several reasons against electing user:Mardetanha as a Steward:
    1- His adminship record in Persian Wikipedia has been awful. During his adminship (which is less than one year), he has abused his sysop power in several times and has blocked several users without any reasonable justification. In at least 2 occasions (one related to me and another related to آقایی@Fawiki ), these blocks are reverted by other admins, and in several other occasions other admins (including user:Raamin) the elected bureaucrat of Persian Wikiedia (user:Behaafarid) have stated that his actions are not justifiable. (these two admins and other users of Persian Wikipedia can confirm this). Indeed, if there was any arbitration committee in Persian Wikipedia, his sysop access should have been removed by now.
    2- In October 2008, there was an election in Persian Wikipedia (about his bureaucrat access) and he didn't get enough votes. When this local community (who knows him better than other communities) doesn't approve him as a local bureaucrat, why should others give him Steward access (which includes all the access that a bureaucrat and a check-user can have in any local Wikipedia, including Persian Wikipedia)?
    3- being steward, as result, means check-user access in all Wikimedia projects (including EnWiki and FaWiki). Giving this access to someone who lives in a country with a history of prosecuting bloggers and online journalists (such as Islamic Republic of Iran, or China) is very problematic. About Mardetanha, this problem is much more severe, because until now in all elections and major disputes in FaWiki, he has been supported by pro-IRI users. Alefbe 01:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment Comment Per to steward polices , Stewards are not allowed "changing rights on home wikis (wikis where they are active community members), except for clear cut cases (such as self-requested removal or emergencies)."so i hereby confirm if I changed any userright in fawiki(and other homewikis) including any kind of CU , OS action my steward flag to be removed --Mardetanha talk 02:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment Comment Yes, indeed. But stewards, Messieurs les Administrateurs, eta. have friends, are friends, parents. (Do you want I give names to you ?…) --Budelberger 03:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC) (). (P.-S. : As I am not an illiterate vandalist – IGNARROGANT, ignoramus –, I have no rights to vote…)[reply]
    As someone who is fairly introduced in the situation on fa.wp, I may say that it is a really complex one and that just not very active users (like Aliparsa) may keep good feelings from almost 100% of contributors. As I know Mardetanha's positions toward political issues, I may say that there is no need for any kind of worrying. Instead of confrontation, I would suggest joint work. Formally, for the community means nothing to have a steward. However, there are a lot of benefits of having a person well introduced in meta (Wikimedia) issues. You will be much better introduced in many Wikimedian aspects if you have a steward in your community. At the other side, as mentioned, permissions handling at home projects is possible just in very rare occasions. Besides that, Mardetanha's experience is very significant for work with other communities. --Millosh 07:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    1- About your familiarity with Persian Wikipedia, I should mention that you don't know Persian language and your contact with Persian Wikipedia has been limited to a couple of pages (that the discussion was in English) and contact with a few FaWiki users (through email and IRC chat). However it seems that this limited contact was enough to notice that Aliparsa is the most respected user of Persian Wikipedia. If you look at elections for admins and bureaucrats in FaWiki, in those elections, all the current admins have been supported by Aliparsa, except user:Mardetanha (Aliparsa neither supported his adminship, nor his bureaucratship). This fact must give you some information about Mardtanha and his situation in FaWiki. I believe that here (in this election) this information is much more relevant than your experience of chatting with Mardetanha. Alefbe 09:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    2- The problem is not restricted to Persian Wikipedia. Even if we forget Persian Wikipedia, having a pro-IRI steward who also lives in Iran endangers the life of independent Iranian uers of other Wikipedias (specially English Wikipedia). Of Course in theory, if he abuses his check-user right, his access will be removed, But in practice, this procedure is not very fast (and sometimes it's not easy to check if he has really abused his check-user right). This issue can put the life of some Iranian users of English Wikipedia in danger (specially those who are Baha'i, or those who edit with anti-IRI viewpoint). You can just look at some examples of those who ended up in jail in Iran, just because of writing a weblog, or just because of contributing in a website (related to women's right). Unfortunately, it seems that the experienced users of MetaWiki don't care about these issues. It seems that just overemphasized politeness (and a few months of doing routine work in MetaWiki) is enough to get a blank check to access personal infomation of users in all Wikimedia projects. That's a shame. Alefbe 09:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I didn't say that I am very well introduced in the situation on fa.wp, but that I am fairly introduced in it. It is based on extensive work which I did last summer there [13]. I don't know Persian, but I had a lot of talks with a number of Persian Wikipedians. (And I have a great respect toward your community.) --Millosh 12:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Reputation is one thing, decision is another. I don't know why Aliparsa didn't support Mardetanha for adminship and bureaucratship. --Millosh 12:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    As I said to you in a personal email, Wikipedia is not a place where people should be foolish and endanger their lives. It is about writing educational materials. Those who are living in Iran shouldn't break Iranian laws. Fields related to (homo)sexuality should be covered at fa.wp by persons who are not living in Iran. --Millosh 12:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Mr. Millosh perhaps you should rephrase your above comment. You are not at a place to order/suggest those users living in Iran NOT to contribute in certain subjects such as issues related to their sexualty/religion/political beliefs/human rights/Women's rights/etc. and just to write about subjects that they are allowed to write, such as benefits of eating potatoes and planting cucumbers and praising Hamas and Islamic Jihad! What you suggested above, is against the fundimental freedom of speech that this encyclopedia is founded upon. --Kaaveh Ahangar 13:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I would like to be able to fly, but I don't have wings. I may, also, talk a lot about which freedoms are endangered in any part of the world, including the West. Wikipedia doesn't have a power to make wings for me, as well as it doesn't have a power to change legal systems of sovereign countries. So, if I am not able to find wings for me, I have to adapt myself for being without wings. The same is about state systems. --Millosh 14:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Lets talk about philosophy and poetry in some other discussion. Back to the issue we were discussing, As far as I know, wikipedia users in Iran who have contributed to the project, haven't yet been put in danger, because the regime didn't have a mean to obtain their info but by giving this CU ability to a user who has exposed his real name, city and even the university that he goes to, we are putting many users in danger of exposure. Did those in the IRC channels told you that just in the past two weeks, 48 people have been executed in Iran? perhaps not! --Kaaveh Ahangar 14:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I know that executions are not so rare in Iran, as well as they are not so rare in some other countries, as well as they were not so rare in USA until 10-20 years ago. However, you didn't tell here why those people were executed. Because of freedom of speech or because of rapes and drug trafficking? Method which you are using here is known as spreading FUD, which is, in fact, a very well known method for discrediting opponents. --Millosh 14:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I really hope you are not defending the IRI. The General Assembly has censured Iran for human rights violations in the past 29 years! is this too part of my so called "campaign of FUD" or FACTS on the table? The Islamic Republic has a long history of executing political disidents under labels of "drug trafickers" and "rapers" and so on. You can see this tactics in claims such president of IRI made about: "'No homosexuals in Iran'". I kindly suggest you to read en:Human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran. --Kaaveh Ahangar 14:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Answers to questions don't appear to be all that well done. Prodego talk 05:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Strongly Oppose Mardetanha is an active user in fa.wikipedia and he is my friend, it's hard for me to oppose my friend but for the following reason, I have to oppose his nomination.
    Mardetanha lives in Iran and so he has to adhere by the contry's laws. The Iranian regime's record of human rights abuse is among the worst in the world. The regime monitors weblogs, and websites such as wikipedia, blocks access to many internet sites and prosecutes internet users who oppose the theocratic regime. The Iranian parliament even approved a bill this year that: "producers of pornographic works and main elements in their production are considered corruptors of the world and could be sentenced to punishment as corruptors of the world." which in Iranian laws mean EXECUTION. So if god forbids, the regime arrest Mardetanha (that writes with his real name) and under torture (which is a common practice in Iranian prisons) get the password access of MT, and uses it to find out of certain IP's who contirbute on articles varying from pornography to politics and religion, who would be responsible for the safety of those users? Therefore I think we shouldn't gamble on the safety and lives of wikipedia users who live in Iran by taking a risk like this. --Kaaveh Ahangar 06:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment Comment i am not working under my real name --Mardetanha talk 06:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment Comment In fa.wikipedia you exposed your real name, and city you live in and even the university you go to. That's more than enough for them to find and get you. --Kaaveh Ahangar 06:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    i have never exposed my real name and nobody knows where do i study or where do i live. i have just exposed my city --Mardetanha talk 06:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    to refresh your memory, do I have to show you links from fa.wikipedia? --Kaaveh Ahangar 06:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Concern is somewhat valid, but hyperbolized. Relations between WMF and Iranian government are very good and I am really skeptical about the possibility for such development of the situation. If elected, Mardetanha may decide not to do any CU on projects where significant portion of contributors are coming from Iran (Persian, Azerbaijani, Kurdish...), which means that we'll be well introduced if something would go wrong. --Millosh 06:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    "Very good Relations between WMF and Iranian government" is only your perception. In reality the Iranian regime looks at wikipedia as an "American project" and as a proof, I can show you links from the official and semi official news agencies of IRI that confirm my claim. I wonder that in a country where the Nobel laureate and peace activist faces daily life threats from the government thugs, how can you downgrade such possibility?! I hope you understand that this is a very serious issue which can affect real lives of some Iranian users. --Kaaveh Ahangar 10:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I would like to hear from contributors who are living in Iran that they are afraid for their lives while working on Wikipedia (and why). It may be sent to me via email. --Millosh 10:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I can hardly believe that Mardetanha would be in danger after being a steward. I cannot however get the point Kaaveh Ahangar tries to justify in this propaganda, although it's true that recently he had conflicts with many fawiki users because of recent Gaza crisis and Kaaveh's pro-Israeli Zionist POV. Among some websites which are filtered in Iran (almost all adult websites + most political oppositions), WP is not filtered, even when some Arabic countries, China, and certain ISPs in the GB filtered some of its content. Note that since many non-pro-IRI or anti-IRI contributors work on it, the state of the articles are not really desirable to the IRI government, yet it's up and working.
    Regarding Alefbet's comment, I can understand his concern, and I was also opposed to Mardetanha's election of bureaucrat in fawiki, not because he is not an active, or knowledged user, but mainly because he seemed not to have enough experience for that. If you were able to read Persian, you could see that Mardetanha and Alefbet had many previous conflicts. One of the recent ones resulted in blockage of Alefbet at fawiki.
    Alefbet's concerns about pro-IRI users or prosecution is also seems to be a propaganda. There are violations of human rights in Iran but, believe or not, I know many Baha'i people in Iran, who openly write their affiliation in their Resume, when applying for a job. This doesn't mean that they have equal rights with others in Iran, but the situation is not as black as that being by Kaaveh and Alefbet described.--Mohsens 20:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC) (same as fawiki)[reply]
    About the conflict between me and Mardetanha, of course I don't deny it (he had abused his sysop power several times, and I wasn't silent about it). About the last incident, you should also mention that others considered that block (by Mardetanha) unjustifiable and User:Behaafarid (the only elected bureaucrat of Persian Wikipedia) reverted Mardetanha's action. Alefbe 21:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Just to second this Alefbet's comment. Mardetanha's act of blocking Alefbet was called unjustifiable by a fawiki bureaucrat (User:Behaafarid). Although that blocking doesn't seem to be fair (a simple revert resolved the issue), User:Behaafarid's advocation of Alefbet was also disputed. Another (previous) blocking of Alefbet by Mardetanha, disputed for a long time on fawiki, was totally wrong IMHO, because he was in an edit war with Alefbet then. --Mohsens 20:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Don't worry please my frinds. I am talking as a user who lives in Iran and corssed internal law border many times. please do believe this drastin image that my fellow citizen from north of America is trying to picture for you, made me doubtful that do I live in such a bad country? I have been living in Iran since begining of my life and I grow up here taking my child to school everyday. This country is not like that their words though. I accept it has got many problems but long away from their words. the story of iranian goverment and steward elections are two completly sepearet matter.please don't make wikipedia as political venue. --دانقولا 23:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    For those who don't know this user, he is not an opponent of IRI, but as a matter of fact, he supports the IRI various policies and of course if you are a pro regime, you would not face any danger in Iran. This user make claims such anti semitism doesn't exist in Iran"! If you can believe this user's claims, you would perhaps take Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's word on "'No homosexuals in Iran'"! --Kaaveh Ahangar 04:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Strongly Oppose. User:Mardetanha has the worst record of errors (and power abuse) among the admins of the Persian Wikipedia. His request for becoming bureaucrat was not approved by the Persian Wikipedians (most of the experienced users of Persian Wikipedia voted against him). Electing him as steward will have catastrophic results for Persian Wikipedia and related projects. Mostafazizi 08:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. No. --Dr. Gert Blazejewski 09:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Aqwis 11:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. above reports of power abuse need to taken seriously indeed, or at least more seriously than most people voting "knows languages, support" seem to be taking it. --Dbachmann 11:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Strongly Oppose. per Alefbe. Cobain 11:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose. As per Kaaveh, this is a very serious issue which can affect real lives of some Iranian users. --Hariva 11:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. sorry, bad notion axpdeHello! 12:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    P.S.: I don't know about what happened, who is guilty and who is not. It's just ... a steward is a powerful position, and anyone applying for this should be "undisputable" ... axpdeHello! 23:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. I have change my mind after reasons above sorry but it is to dangerous, we are talking about life--Seha 13:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Sorry, but with all due respect, and after giving it much thinking, I have to say no. It is a bit soon for being an steward. His agenda is not clean enough, and his experience is not enough too. Huji 14:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Obelix 15:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. As much as I'd love to see a non-Western user as Steward, the issues raised above cast a serious enough doubt to force me to oppose. Better be safe than sorry. -- Nahum 15:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose. Too risky. shirulashem 16:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Oppose Mardetanha, a steward? NO. He doesn't use his administration tools in fa.wikipedia properly; now give him more tools? Raamin 16:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. He looks like he can be very helpful because of technical skills and knowing many languages which are not widely spoken among stewards, but Iranian laws, many doubts about his administrator experience and terrible answers to questions don't allow to trust him — NickK 19:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for your participation in page i have mentioned above i am not working under my real name and so their claim is not valid. --Mardetanha talk 19:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    But the other problems remain — NickK 19:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. NonvocalScream 21:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Oppose Oppose --Kjetil_r 23:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose. --Burn ID 03:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Strongly Oppose [[14]] User Mardetanha has an unpleasant way into dealing with other users. He abuses his management advantages against other users if they discuss in a discussion against his opinion. Because of his negative qualities, he has failed in fawikipedia at steward elections. He terrorizes the users since then who have taken a vote against him. If he is elected as a steward here, then he has more possibilities to terrorize Persian Wiki users. Fawiki loses more users if Mardetanha is elected here. He is not Trustworthy because he makes false statements about himself. Ojanfar 04:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Recasted my vote per power abuse reports above. --Ivan Štambuk 05:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I have never misused my sysop tools moreover there are more than one project to check my administrator action not just fawiki.by review my general activity you have have better background on me.please check my administrator action in all of these wikis--Mardetanha talk 08:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Very well, I'm convinced. --Ivan Štambuk 19:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    See User talk:Ivan Štambuk for Mardetanha's allegations (to discredit oppose votes), and my comment about those allegations. Alefbe 09:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --P@d@w@ne 09:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Oppose OpposeToo problematic, biased. Alex F. 11:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC) (User may not be eligible: No home wiki is identified. --Shunpiker 17:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Found eligible account with SUL utility, so dropping objection, but user should register themselves per guidelines to avoid future confusion. --Shunpiker 17:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]
  21. Oppose because of:
  1. Do you really want it happen again? --Ali20 wiki 10:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry i doubt you even really know know what is Steward and what is his job .i Have told several time here Wikipedia is not a place for your political debates .and i am not working under my real name.--Mardetanha talk 16:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Patrol110 14:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC) I have made wrong decision. Sorry. Patrol110 22:18, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose Oppose — MrDolomite • Talk 15:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    enough doubt to opose Vuvar1 16:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)maybe I don't know the situation well enough to vote against him, but I still waiting for some answers Vuvar1 21:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please help me in keeping wiki out of political debates .Wikipedia is not a venue for political debates.if government is arrogant it has nothing to me .Don't judge based on my government --Mardetanha talk 18:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    It's essential that political disagreements from one wiki not spread on to meta. By having Mardetanha as an Steward, it would be very likely to have wars and political disagreements from fa.wikipedia spread on to meta. --Kaaveh Ahangar 20:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Oppose Rejecting someone due to circumstances they can't control, like an authoritarian thought-controlling government, is quite sad, but people's lives are in danger here. Habbit 18:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Contra. QuartierLatin1968 20:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose Oppose Pharaoh of the Wizards 23:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose Oppose - Security issues are serious IMHO. Jaakobou 10:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Oppose Oppose - insurmountable safety issues and probably illegal to export private information from the EU or US to Iran. I wouldn't want to read about people being stoned to death or hanged in Iran due to information on WP that others have permitted to be used that way. Carlossuarez46 20:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I am not working under my real name .it's completely unfair to judge my Wikipedia activity because of my government --Mardetanha talk 20:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't care what name you're working under - your computer and passwords will give access to information that can cost people their lives - it's unfortunate that you live in Iran, but the people of Iran voted in a government that views dissenting speech as punishable by death. You are subject to those laws, anonymous or not. I am not judging what your activity is or isn't, it's just that in the hands of your government the information may cost lives - a risk I am unwilling to make and one which I find your nonchalance about more than mildly disturbing. Carlossuarez46 21:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry,It seems you don't red above argument.per steward policy steward are not allowed to perform any CU on their homewiki + wikis who has their local CUs.Anyway steward election is not venue for political debates.thanks for your vote and participation --Mardetanha talk 21:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    The discussion is not about what is legal. It's about the access that you will have and the possibility that you (or someone on behalf of you) might misuse it. As a steward you will have Check-User right in Persian Wikipedia, as well as English Wikipedia and other projects. Alefbe 21:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Nice :) i was in doubt that you know what is steward exactly .None of steward has CU or OS right by default.in the time of request they grant themselves CU or OS flag with the condition that i have mentioned above neither their homewiki nor wikis with local CU or OS --Mardetanha talk 21:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    The difference doesn't matter (the details of the procedure is not important). What matters is that they have the ability to do that. Alefbe 21:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    This my final answer to you .we all have abiltiy to kill each other but we don't because of have rules and moral and Steward are subject of steward policy and i will act very accordingly --Mardetanha talk 21:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose for screwing up so much threaded discussion on this page. ST47 00:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose---Larno Man 01:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC) I read oppose comments. I do not think that what they are talking is true. They are exaggerating about their security concerns. This is only a false alarm to scare voters--Larno Man 02:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Strong Oppose- If someone is responsible, s/he will not accept checkuser access while s/he lives in Iran. There is no room for error. (you can read this example about security in Iran.) -- Fa.wiki sysop, Taranet 07:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    As Milosh said above "If elected, Mardetanha may decide not to do any CU on projects where significant portion of contributors are coming from Iran (Persian, Azerbaijani, Kurdish...), which means that we'll be well introduced if something would go wrong."
    And Mardtanha has said above that "so i hereby confirm if I changed any userright in fawiki(and other homewikis) including any kind of CU, OS action my steward flag to be removed" which if I interpret correctly means what Milosh has said. --دوستدار ويکيپديا 10:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Furthermore, Iranian government acts only when it feels "threatened". Sure, they do it when they come to the conclusion that the price they have to pay for it worths doing it (just as many other governments do so, and have done so). Filtering Wikipedia altogether would be a better choice than tracking its contributors, both effort-wise and politically, wouldn't it? --دوستدار ويکيپديا 10:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oppose - While the claims above may be unsubstantiated, the possibility of it affecting real people in a marked way is a risk that is should be mitigated. -- Jeff3000 16:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I was also leaning towards neutral/abstain despite having found Mardetanha to be very helpful when I wished to learn more about the Incubator project, however Mardetanha has now written "User:Mardetanha/recusal", which does mitigate any real risk. All users are at risk of the NSA/CIA/MI5 sniffing steward passwords in order to obtain privileged information, and that threat seems more credible to me than Iran torturing Mardetanha to obtain his password. John Vandenberg 18:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Oppose Strongly oppose per Alefbe above. nsaa 16:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I've been contacted by Mardetanha by e-mail at "Feb 6, 2009 at 03:37". He sounds like a nice guy with a lot of language skills (a strong candidate in this regard), but unhappily I can't change my vote. You should be very carefull/never do a blocking when yourself is engaged in a discussion. If I've understand it correctly he has done this twice on his home wiki. This makes me feel that the candidate doesn't understand some of the basic principles governing Wikipedia and the extra tools you get when you're an admin on every project (steward). For example it's possible for him or IRI to completely remove stuff like this and only other stewards are able to detect it. I'm a bit worried about that Stewards doesn't need to log in securely by https://. Then it's no problem for the IRI government or other parts of the cleric leadership to interfere and grab the account without his knowledge. Or have I greatly misunderstand someting? nsaa 22:51, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Oppose Oppose Strongly Oppose. Tesi1700 18:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Doesn't seem eligible to vote (based on the userpage). Alefbe 18:41, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Says who? from the voting requirements "# either have an account on Meta with userpage linked to your homewiki, and a link to your meta account from your homewiki userpage or have a linked SUL account;". I do have a linked SUL account.Tesi1700 18:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, no problem. Sorry about the false alarm. Alefbe 20:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Mo Cuishle 19:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Oppose Oppose – I’m sorry — H92 (t · c · no) 20:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. good heaven's NO. As Alefbe and numerous others have already pointed out, Mardetanha is untrustworthy. We need stewards with moral integrity, and above reproach. Mardetanha fails that litmus test. -- (cypsy) 10:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose seems to be dangerous --Gdgourou 10:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC) change my vote after some discussion with him --Gdgourou 13:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose Bence My Talk 15:18, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Oppose Oppose Strongly Oppose Mr. Vernon 07:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose again. Why? I think, jobcolector. Sorry. Bence My Talk 13:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. I see some concerns here sorry. --Herby talk thyme 16:19, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Oppose Oppose - I oppose, not because of naive arguments about security issues for him from IRI, but because Mardetanha doesn't seem to have enough experience and knowledge for being a steward. He made some mistakes during his administration in fawiki (links can be provided here if needed), and that's why we have no support up to now from fawiki sysops in favor of him, but in contrast, there are 2 oppositions (Taranet, and Raamin). He is a hard-working Wikipedian, with many benefits at least for fawiki community, but I believe this is too early for him to have such a privilege here. His recent attempt to become a bureaucrat in fawiki failed, because there wasn't enough consent on his experience and ability in handling what a bureaucrat should do here. --Mohsens 19:23, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks to you and Huji for two valid objections. If I counted well, just two of you and Dbachman voted against because of valid Wikimedian concerns. However (there is always some "however" :) ), knowing that there are just 7 admins at fa.wp with more than 110.000 of registered users and more than 1300 active users, I think that pressure on admins at fa.wp is not a regular pressure which other admins or stewards are having during their regular work. To compare numbers with one relaxed case: Norwegian Wikipedia has 66 admins with 105.000 registered users and more than 2500 active users. Even if we count just ratio between number of admins and number of active users, fa.wp should have at least 20-30 admins to split pressure on them more or less regularly. Note, also, that Mardetanha didn't make any problem during his half year work in SWMT, which is, in fact, the most important stewards' task. --Millosh 20:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Millosh, thanks for your concerns. I highly respect your insights on this topic. BTW, although not forced by the policies or guidelines here, I believe Stewards should have enough experience and trust from their native wiki. Mardetanha doesn't seem to have. --Mohsens 21:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Just to say again that I respect your position as a valid one. Our positions are different, but they are strictly related to how we see Wikimedian issues. I would really like that I am looking into the argumentation like yours as a dominant type at the opposing side. --Millosh 21:51, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Oppose Oppose Because he has reacted very poorly to complaints by users on Commons when he deleted images, see for example here. /Pieter Kuiper 08:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Are you actually opposing mardetanha as a steward, just because he didn't realize the File: prefix was missing? --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:29, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    How could one miss such a thing? It is symptomatic for how this admin disregards mail from users; Commons:User talk:Mardetanha#Image:Higgins.jpg is another example. /Pieter Kuiper 17:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    In some cultures it is not polite enough to say just "OK" or to say nothing after the information is given. Knowing that, I don't see any kind of negative reaction in his words "Thanks for informing". --Millosh 20:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    The point is that for four weeks he did not react to my complaint about the deletion. Mardetanha has today contacted me to ask me to study his record and to reconsider my vote. He was unfailingly polite, but I do not really like such emails. I see that other users have much more favourable impressions, but I contribute my vote here based on my impressions on a project where I am active. /Pieter Kuiper 23:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    OK. A valid point. I didn't know for details, so your objection seemed a little bit weird at the beginning. --Millosh 23:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Oppose Oppose --Anthony Ivanoff 17:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. I think that Mardetanha needs more experience, he is very new to Wikimedia. I do not appreciate the commenting on opinions of voters on either side, so please refrain from commenting my vote, it is my personal opinion and only an evaluation of his aibility for being a steward this year, maybe next year I would support him, I respect Mardetanha as a person. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose I don't like the canvessing and the comments on other peoples votes. You don't need to ask others to vote for you, if you are good enough they'll do it on their own initiative, you also shouldn't comment on other peoples votes because although Wikimedia is not a vote, elections on Wikimedia are true votes, and a persons vote, is their vote! fr33kman t - c 03:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry i haven't canvassed actually i am victim of canvassing + i don't comment under votes just those one which need answer .please read Lar's comment. Thanks for participation.--Mardetanha talk 03:17, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    You did send me an email saying that you had always tried to be a responsive admin, asking me to look at your matrix, and requesting me to review my vote. /Pieter Kuiper 09:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    When around one candidate FUD is spread that (1) he may leak IP addresses to a repressive regime, (2) that he is a pan-Turkist, but,(3) that he is, at the other side, Iranian nationalist and (4) anti-Semite -- the only option which that person has is to try to explain to people that he is not that. At the other side, in your particular case, I think that he shouldn't send an email to you because it is not related to FUD spread around him. --Millosh 17:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Strongly Oppose sorry for haven`t enough time and tools for xplaining the facts. i`m in trip and have no english keyboard for type easily. but my duty forced me to give vote. his electing for being steward is very very dengerous for iranian fa.wiki users! some user said reasons and I don`t repeat those now. plz see User talk:Mardetanha/archive1#gordafarid for one case of his bad sysoping. then he said lie that anyone didn`t know his realy name on top of the oppose votes parageraph!! in fa.wiki all perfect users like me know his realy name and family name and I think the liar must not be stewards. in this manner the ministry of informatiom in islamic republic know him and its very bad for persian users. excuse me for bad writing.--Gordafarid 18:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC) I edit some wrongs with english keyboard--Gordafarid 15:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Duty?! Are you receive email during your trip for voting?! Don't call him liar for personal conflict. I'm sysop on fa.wiki, Mradetanha, me, roozbeh (bureaucrat on fa.wiki) and hessam (ex-sysop on fa.wiki) block you for more than 4 months on fa.wiki. only users have received his emails may know his real name. Also read this. ظهیری 21:22, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    yea, duty! my duty to my native language!! I love persian (farsi) not same someone that liked the arabic! if some persons like this user will be a steward, we must accept and watch ending the fa.wiki story. then I don`t give e-mail, I read discussions in villagepump in fa.wiki and as soon as possible arrive myself to here to voting. about other crimes from u, I havn`t time to answer. be happy.--Gordafarid 15:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Oppose Oppose--Wikikids 03:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose--Node ue 06:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Changed my mind! --Node ue 20:56, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose Too trigger-happy. This user had blocked me without my wrongdoing. Admittedly ackonwledged this tho--Agricoleur 00:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Not elegible to vote, confirmed by account elegiblity —Dferg (meta-w:es.) 12:10, 14 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]
  25. Oppose Oppose --ysangkok 23:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Oppose Oppose Too many problems reported here. O. Morand 10:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Oppose Oppose OhanaUnitedTalk page 14:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Oppose Oppose lack of experiences.--Kwj2772 (論) 13:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose per O. Morand. --OrsolyaVirág 18:40, 20 February 2009 (UTC) --OrsolyaVirág 21:36, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Oppose Oppose --Brownout(msg) 00:17, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Oppose Oppose Shatin 03:33, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. Neutral Neutral --Sir James 06:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Neutral Neutral I'm a bit worried regarding the iranian laws that may be harmful for Mardetanha and the other reasons that are shown the in no part, but as far as I know Mardetanha is a trustful person. I hope he would explain to me and / or to all how he thinks to fix these problems. --Filnik 10:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Clarifications arrived.. skipped to support ;-)[reply]
  2. Neutral Neutral Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral Neutral --Davecrosby uk 00:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Neutral Neutral The concerns raised in opposition are enough to prevent me from supporting this candidate. Kingturtle 18:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutral Neutral I am not commenting on the candidate right now, but note that at least one of the opposers committed some widespread canvassing before being asked to stop. Canvassing means to systematically confront persons to try to convince them to vote like you. Please note that canvassing is strongly discouraged, and if you are here to vote based on such emails, please vote based on the merits of the candidate rather than pressure from others. ++Lar: t/c 03:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Agreed. —Pathoschild 03:41:29, 05 February 2009 (UTC)
    I would second that. Huji 15:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Neutral Neutral I'm a little worried about the problem concern to Mardetanha... --Taichi - (あ！) 03:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

Meno25

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Sami Lab 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Very impressive. GlassCobra 00:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Support Yes. Razorflame 00:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Kanonkas 00:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. He did a good job with WM2008. miranda 00:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Absolutely. Majorly talk 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Frank Schulenburg 00:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Puntori 00:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Cbrown1023 talk 00:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. NuclearWarfare 00:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Az1568 (talk) 00:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Seha 00:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Ivan Štambuk 00:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support. Qualified in many aspects. -- Mentifisto 01:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. -- OK. Marcus Cyron 01:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Nishkid64 (talk) 01:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support — neuro(talk) 01:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --FollowTheMedia 01:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Matt (Talk) 01:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Shizhao 02:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Support Ruzgar 02:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Very important linguistic skills and hard worker. --Millosh 04:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. I say YES, and by all means strongly Support Support Meno25.--Producer 04:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Very active with very important language skills. I didn't intend to support anyone else, but I think I will make an exception for Meno. Prodego talk 05:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Sure. --Ciphers 05:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Yes. We need RTF stewards :) bastique demandez! 06:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Sir James 06:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Avjoska 06:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Yes. --Shipmaster 07:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Yes of course --Heshamdiab16 07:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 08:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Yes. Arjun G. Menon 08:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Sebleouf 08:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --CERminator 08:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes. --Yamanam 09:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Certainly! --.snoopy. ✉ 09:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Support Support, sure, well known trusted user. good luck.--OsamaK 10:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Support Support --Mohamed Ouda 10:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Yes. Alefbe 10:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Man77"..."(de) 10:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Wing 10:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support Support--Konsnos 10:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. نَعَم Jon Harald Søby 10:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. →Na·gy 11:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Béria Lima Msg 11:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Support Support I trust him :-) --Bassem JARKAS 11:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Njaelkies Lea 11:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Support Support and good luck -- TRD 11:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support Support Yann 11:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. feydey 12:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Davemustaine 13:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. --Obersachse 13:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Cenarium (Talk) 14:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Stifle 14:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. --MF-W 14:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Obelix 15:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Definitely. - Rjd0060 15:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Strong Support. The more diversity, the better. -- Nahum 15:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. --Fabexplosive The archive man 15:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. --Herby talk thyme 16:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. A lot of useful skills. Rje 16:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support Support --Elmoro 16:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Support Support Pharaoh of the Wizards 16:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Support Support iAlex 17:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. -- Bryan (talk|commons) 18:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Sure! --Mido 19:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Support Support — NickK 19:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Support Support--Ahonc 19:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. –Ejs-80 20:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. NonvocalScream 21:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. --Nemo 21:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Support Support --Histolo2 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. --Jan eissfeldt 22:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC) strong support[reply]
  77. --Thogo (talk) 00:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. --AndreasPraefcke 01:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. FayssalF 02:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Sí/Yes/はい. --Taichi - (あ！) 03:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. faithless (speak) 05:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Support Support Aude 05:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84. --Saltinbas 06:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support, because of big experience and en-4. LexArt 08:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 19:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. --P@d@w@ne 09:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. I trust Meno, therefore I Support Support them (they consist of several people fused together :P).--Alnokta 09:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Support Support--Nick1915 - all you want 11:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Met in person. Seems pleasant and capable. --FiliP × 12:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89. --Uwe Gille 12:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Support Support --OosWesThoesBes 14:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Support Support — MrDolomite • Talk 15:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Support Support -- Lychee 16:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. نعم RyanGerbil10 18:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Ar son Ar son - yup! - Alison ❤ 19:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Pro. QuartierLatin1968 20:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support Support ~ Seb35 22:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. --Davecrosby uk 00:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Support Support--Kwj2772 04:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 04:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Support Support--Chaos 08:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Support Support --Aram33 12:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Great guy, help me in ar translations. Alex Pereira falaê 12:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Strong Support Support, as per Alnokta, the "Meno23"s are the best ever fused wikipedians to be joined in a human form. Hope he makes it to the board. --Tarawneh 17:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Support Support--Miguel Andrade 20:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support Support-- JAn Dudík 21:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Support Support(I hereby affirm this vote has not been influenced by the Alexandria effect. Much.) Proofreader77 22:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support Support--- Very professinal and unbiased! Also polite and friendly. مبتدئ 01:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Support Support Yes. Great guy ––Aboluay 01:52, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Support Support I think Meno25 would do a good job if elected, that is why I support him. Grosscha 04:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)24.11.179.22 04:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Support Support Caiaffa 03:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Support Support --Gdgourou 10:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Support Support. ~Innvs: 12:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Oui Adailton 14:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  116. --Church of emacs talk 16:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  117. John Vandenberg 18:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Support Support he is working hard. --O.Waqfi 22:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Support Support --Roberta F. 18:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Support Support --Finn Rindahl 15:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Pleasant guy to work with. --Aphaia 18:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Support Support Because we need Arab language stewards. --Wayiran 19:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Micpol 22:16, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Support Support Syed Atif Nazir 23:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Support Support Walkerma 04:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Support Support Poco a poco 12:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Support Support Kzhr 15:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Support Support Ched Davis 18:20, 8 February 2009 (UTC) (only name I recognize in my short time here - all positive)[reply]
  129. helpful & friendly, though I would wish for a bit more crosswiki-work, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 01:28, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  130. micki talk 21:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Support Support Good candidate --Captain-tucker 16:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Laedit 16:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote. Please see Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters. --Meno25 16:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  132. ok --Rax 21:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Support Support --Osm agha 22:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Nbarth 01:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  135. support -- phoebe 05:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  136. -- lucasbfr talk 09:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Support Support This guy has great contribs, and is a fair and reasonable debater. he'll will make an excellent steward. Mkruijff 15:23, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Support Support --Kaganer 17:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  139. EdBever 19:05, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Support Support I have see him in action. I don't agree with his actions, but he is active and good. Carsrac 23:03, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Mnokel 07:22, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote. Please see this link. --Meno25 16:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Support Support--Thesupermat 10:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  142. --Mayer Bruno 20:00, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Support Support Very well qualified. Maedin\talk 21:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Support Support --ysangkok 23:24, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Support Support -- Harrywad 23:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Support Support --Höyhens 03:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Support Support --Ali1 06:12, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Support Support Good language skills and enough experience. O. Morand 10:56, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Support Support --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Support Support, definitely. Juliancolton 00:15, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Support Support --‍Komeil 4life 13:18, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Support SupportNatanaeel83 20:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Support Support - Punx 08:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Support Support and I wonder why I didn't vote in your support sooner! Huji 12:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Support Support He is an excellent adminstrator, I am sure that he has all the knowledge and devotion needed to be a good steward.--Mohammed Ahmed 18:35, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Support Support Useful Languages (ar. en.) --دانقولا 23:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Support Support --Mardetanha talk 21:33, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. --Latitude 08:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    por que?--Alnokta 09:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose Oppose Too problematic, biased. Alex F. 23:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Could you mention any examples so that we are all aware.--Alnokta 19:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I second Alnokta. How come you think he is biased? Would you give some argumentaed examples? Mkruijff 15:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose. Tesi1700 18:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. After a second thought, I have to Oppose Yamanam 09:09, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    What could possibly be that second thought? --Mido 16:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    well, simply because he particpates in Egyption wiki! I think all Arabs know for sure that there is NO such language called Egyption! Anyways, we are not here to discuss the Egyption wiki, so honestly, I can't trust someone who would support such a project. Yamanam 08:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please see my comment on this. Thanks. --Meno25 13:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose Makes problems, not friendly & is authoritarian for no reason. He intends to replace the welcome templates that we use to welcome new users with the script inside the template. This makes a problem, because we need to change the words & links inside the templates, but when he pastes the words of the templates instead of the template itself {{}}, we are not able anymore to apply changes for all the pages that we have put the welcome template for them. We tried many times to ask him why is he acting so strange on Wikipedia Masri, he refused to give us reasons. So, we had to ban him from editing on wikipedia Masri. I was so tired recovering ALL his mess. Now I don't want to see this authoritarian guy is an administrator for all wikipedias, so he would mess with wikipedia Masri, that almost everybody likes to corrupt it! He's already an administrator & a check-user in Arabic wikipedia. Most of Arabic administrators are HELL against Masri wikipedia & evilly want to corrupt it, such as Ahmed Basyuni. --Mahmudmasri 04:35, 18 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]
    It is ironic how both people with and against arz.wp oppose Meno for being with, and against arz at the same time. Stop being ambivalent, Meno! Other than that: There is no admin on ar.wp by the name you mention,if he claims he is, you can easily check the access log you posted, and Meno was probably substituting the welcome template on your wiki in accordance with what's customary on meta, en.wp and most other wikis. I am pretty sure that is he didnt have vandalism in mind and banning for that is pretty unreasonable (languo-political tensions notwithstanding). --Shipmaster 05:43, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote. Please see this link. --Meno25 16:41, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    This is my original user-name on incubator http://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Dudi . I made another one 'cause I couldn't globalize "Dudi" & continued on using it after the migration of Masri wikipedia from the incubator to arz.wikipedia.org. & for Shipmaster, Oh really, am I the one who is politicizing issues here! You are against Masri wikipedia & called it قيام ويكيبيديا المصرية ليس اسوأ سيء ممكن ان يحدث في العالم. Why is it that bad to make a wikipedia version for a true vernacular? Or you are the one who is politicized here who doesn't accept the truth that is against your pan-Arabism! You also tried to open debates that would increase the opposition for Masri wikipedia, such as claiming that we write in Latin alphabet, when we stated that we would open the project to write in Arabic Alphabet [16], when anyone visits Masri wikipedia, will see that all of its articles are written in Arabic alphabet, with just few articles written in Latin as an example for a different writing system, NOT TO WRITE IN LATIN ALPHABET INSTEAD OF ARABIC ALPHABET. I have to mention as well that Kurdish wikipedia is written in both alphabets! Why didn't we see any outrage on it? In Masri wikipedia, we have become used to the daily routine of vandalism & corruption that is tiring us & not giving us the chance to enhance it further more. & yes, if you see Meno25 edits on Masri wikipedia, you would notice that it's mostly non-sense just to increase his edit counts. Meno25 is already an administrator# Meno25 (Check user, Administrator) (Created on 15 April 2006 at 09:48) & a check-user# Meno25 (Check user, Administrator) (Created on 15 April 2006 at 09:48) in Arabic wikipedia --Mahmudmasri 18:15, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please see my comment on this. Thanks. --Meno25 00:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    FYI I wrote this and the sentence you pasted in Arabic translates to "The creation of Wikipedia Masry is not the worst thing to happen in the world". But Ok, Whatever, we get it, we are all bad people here. You made your point, you are against Meno because he was 'corrupting' arz.wp, you banned him because he was 'vandalizing' your wiki by substituting welcome templates. I am not going to reply further, Regards. --Shipmaster 01:22, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Stop misleading & disinformation! " ليس اسوأ سيء ممكن ان يحدث في العالم" means, that it's not the worst thing of the worst things that can happen in the world, meaning that it's really bad, but there are worse things in the world. Now it differs from what you want to mislead readers with. It's not only for Meno's substitution for templates, he also makes non-sense edits & pastes templates from the Arabic wikipedia without even translating it to the Egyptian Arabic & this is against Masri wikipedia. Re-read my comment from the beginning! --Mahmudmasri 04:43, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for the civility, I wasnt going to reply, but since you are misquoting me, let me translate my whole paragraph (in response to someone from ar.wp complaining about attribution), here is what I said: "I have another issue beside the point, the pinnacle of collaborative work is to facilitate what you do not approve of if the community approved it. I personally reply to OTRS emails from people who are outraged at the creation of Wikipedia Masry by explaining the Wikimedia policy that led to its creation despite that I myself am not convinced. So I would like to please ask fellow wikipedians to stop putting hurdles in the path of this project and assume good faith, The people who approved this project did so to spread knowledge even if we disagree with them. And the creation of Wikipedia Masry is not the worst thing to happen in the world and reading information in Masry or standard Arabic doesnt matter as long as the information will be read in the first place (please look at the illiteracy rate in the Arabic world.)", Now I dont know how you would translate this as me bashing your project, still, I ask you to assume good faith. I would also like to ask you stop using words like 'corrupt', 'evil' and 'misleading' in light of civility. Thank you. --Shipmaster 05:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Let me see, i wonder whether that who performed the banning on Meno25 on Wikipedia Masri understands at all the banning policy or the definition of vandalism! I have no memory that the definition of vandalism included at any time Template substitution which states clearly "The archives of a user's talk page should show the actual welcome message they received, not the current welcome message." I believe this will satisfactory reply your question which i wished you would look for it yourself before performing an invalid ban on an exellent user who use the best of his time to develop the quality of a new born project and teach the users over there who to do the things in the right way. --Ciphers 06:46, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Maybe that undeniably outstanding "excellent" Arabic contributor user wasn't so good in Masri wikipedia. My complaining wasn't just for his substitution. NB: I see that both of Shipmaster# Shipmaster (Bureaucrat, Administrator) (Created on 20 August 2006 at 07:33) & Ciphers are from the Arabic wikipedia. --Mahmudmasri 08:21, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose Oppose , and reasons are;
  • Double standards, by not agreeing to a project and then attempt to share in it, his edits on translation caused disruption to the translation efforts on beta translate, and they still need a lot of work on them. *Lack of neutrality, and reduced acceptance of others' right to differ, showing lack of tolerance. This is obvious from his answers and the attempt of his supporters to hide the opposer's opinion by striking it, and him agreeing to that and not removing the strike. *Disagreeing with language committee, risking having divisive arguments if he was a steward. --Ghaly 09:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. Neutral Neutral Vyk 11:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ...Aurora... 12:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

Mike.lifeguard (Mike Ingram)

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Lvova 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Very helpful and full knowledge of all tools, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Meno25 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Kanonkas 00:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. miranda 00:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support. Active Wikimedia contributor, brilliant Meta sysop, granting him stewardship will make spammers cry (let's hope their puppets won't come and cause vote fraud) — vvv 00:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Iceflow 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Thogo (talk) 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Strong support. PeterSymonds 00:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Strikeout Sister 00:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support Yes. Definitely will use the rights for the benefit of the Wikipedias. Razorflame 00:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. V85 00:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. ОйЛ (OiL) 00:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Frank Schulenburg 00:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Aleksandrit 00:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support, very active user. --Joku Janne 00:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Szwedzki 00:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC). Cheers.[reply]
  19. Support Support The Helpful One 00:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Cbrown1023 talk 00:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Mr.Z-man 00:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Support Willking1979 00:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support Based on his work at wikiversity I have full confidence in him. --mikeu talk 00:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. sure. Micha L. Rieser 00:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Az1568 (talk) 00:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Seha 00:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Ivan Štambuk 00:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Herr Kriss 00:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Vituzzu 00:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Al Lemos 01:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Strong support, definitely. — Kalan ? 01:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Yaroslav Blanter 01:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Sí/Yes/はい. --Taichi - (あ！) 01:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Support Support Nishkid64 (talk) 01:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. normally too much jobs - but one of the less persons here I know and know, he' trustworthy and do his jobs and not only collect them. Marcus Cyron 01:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Most certainly ! Alphos [bother me] 01:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Yes. Seems ro know what stewardship is about. Hopes he stays as active as he is. Romaine 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. McMonster 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Support Support — neuro(talk) 01:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. --Wcam 01:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Matt (Talk) 01:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Shizhao 02:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Of course. Mike was an amazing help during his stay at Wikiversity and gave us some valuable information and advice during that time. Ottava Rima 02:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --Luxo 02:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Love his work. macy 02:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Support, Woody 03:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Support Support Helped me lots of times and answered my questions. He will make a good steward. Techman224Talk 03:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support Support—『Skjackey tse』 03:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  49. --Revolus Echo der Stille 04:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Giggy 04:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. One of the best candidates. --Millosh 04:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. One of the few I support. Prodego talk 04:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Support Support Clearly. MBisanz talk 04:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Helps against vandalism at Tagalog wikipedia too. - AnakngAraw 04:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. — YourEyesOnly 05:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Support. Superm401 | Talk 05:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Yes. bastique demandez! 06:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. --Sir James 06:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Avjoska 06:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Yes. --Shipmaster 07:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 07:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Rubin16 08:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 08:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Sebleouf 08:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Yes. Arjun G. Menon 08:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. --CERminator 08:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Kameraad Pjotr 09:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. We haven't always seen eye to eye, but he does fine work. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Daniel (talk) 09:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. − Elfix × talk (fr) 09:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  71. yeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Mike go :)) --.snoopy. ✉ 09:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Strong support --Gothika 09:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. --DR 09:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Support Support --Mopza Talk 09:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Support Support, sure.--OsamaK 10:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. --Brownout(msg) 10:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Support Support --Filnik 10:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Support Support --Lucien leGrey ( m | es ) 10:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Willemo 10:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. --Wing 10:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Support Support--Konsnos 10:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Ja. Jon Harald Søby 10:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Yes. Alefbe 10:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Njaelkies Lea 10:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. →Na·gy 11:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Béria Lima Msg 11:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Has the broad experience and ability in other languages required. Rudget (talk) 11:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Support Support Vyk 11:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. ~ putnik 11:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Support Support Ninomy 11:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Support Support M!cki talk 11:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  93. Support Support Yann 11:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. --Ukko 12:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95. oscar 12:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96. --Florian Adler 12:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Good candidate. Jóna Þórunn 12:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Very Strong Support - Long time expereince with this user on Wikibooks and Wikiversity, and has the skills necessary to act as a responsible steward. --Roberth 12:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Support Support Cirt (talk) 12:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Support Support--Gökhan 13:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Strong support - Davemustaine 13:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Support Support -- John N. 13:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Cenarium (Talk) 14:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Support Support --Trixt 14:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Annabel 14:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Very strong support —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 14:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Support Support - Chrism 14:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Stifle 14:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Patio 14:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Support Support Go for Mike ;) --Acarpentier 14:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111. --buecherwuermlein 14:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112. --MF-W 14:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Obelix 15:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Dedicated and experienced user who I have no doubts about. - Rjd0060 15:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  115. trusted fellow. DarkoNeko 15:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  116. STRONG Support Support --Garfieldairlines 15:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Support Zil 15:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  118. --Fabexplosive The archive man 15:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  119. --BokicaK 15:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  120. & strongly. One of a very small number of Wikimedians who I trust & respect greatly. I have complete confidence in Mike. --Herby talk thyme 16:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  121. EugeneZelenko 16:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Support Support iAlex 17:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  123. May the wiki be with you. ComputerGuy890100 17:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Support Support Diti (talk to the penguin) 18:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Support Support -jkb- 18:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  126. -- Bryan (talk|commons) 18:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Strong support, really good and useful cross-wki work — NickK 19:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Support Support Level headed, sensible, pragmatic, trustworthy. Unusual? Quite TalkQu 20:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Support Support --Ahonc 20:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  130. NonvocalScream 21:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  131. –Ejs-80 21:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  132. TheNeon 22:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Very efficient, strong support. Clem23 22:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  134. --Martin H. 23:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  135. John Reaves (talk) 00:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Support Support Athrion 00:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Support Support Mike helps to combat vandals in Cantonese Wikipedia, appears to have great commitment toward Wikipedia --WikiCantona 01:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Dekimasu 02:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  139. --Flamelai 02:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  140. FayssalF 02:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  141. faithless (speak) 05:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  142. --Saltinbas 05:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  143. -- Tawker 06:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Deadstar 08:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Support Support Mike doing a god job. --Marine-Blue [ talk contribs ] 09:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  146. --P@d@w@ne 09:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  147. They seek nothing but to help, so Support Support it is.--Alnokta 09:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  148. sure!--Nick1915 - all you want 11:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Filipe RibeiroMsg 12:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  150. A no-brainer (decision, not the candidate). --FiliP × 12:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Uwe Gille 12:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  152. --Baiji --> (Opinión) 14:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Jaranda | wat's sup' 14:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Note: User is eligible to vote, enwiki account is User:Secret, which was checked with Pathos' tool and passed. The Helpful One 14:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]
  154. Support Support--ZaDiak 14:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Support Support --OosWesThoesBes 14:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Why not!-- BlueDevil Talk 14:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  157. GlassCobra 15:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Support Support — MrDolomite • Talk 15:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Support Support -- Avi 15:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Support Support --Jomegat 17:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  161. --Pietrodn · talk with me 18:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support-- --201.209.168.188 19:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please log in to vote, thanks. →Na·gy 19:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Balabiot 19:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  163. We have had our numerous disagreements, but Mike is highly active and hardworking, and will make an excellent steward. Majorly talk 20:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  164. --Isderion 20:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Pro. QuartierLatin1968 20:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Garden 21:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Mike is only person I can vote for. Other candidates I dont know. I had an experience with him on different issues and project and I think he can be a good steward. He was always helpfull to other people.--Juan de Vojníkov 22:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Support Support --Túrelio 22:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Support Support Pharaoh of the Wizards 23:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  170. --Davecrosby uk 00:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Support Support He's cute. --Mixwell 01:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  172. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 04:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Support Support --Béotien lambda 12:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Support Support --Love Krittaya 12:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Of course. Alex Pereira falaê 12:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  176. I do have some concerns that Mike may be a bit too red tape obsessed. But on balance I think he's going to be a fine steward. His opposers will give him something to think about, and the rest of us will keep his tendencies red-tape-wise in line. He has a large number of good qualities that way overbalance that issue... hard worker, highly trusted, calm demeanor, knows his way around a lot of wikis, good at CU... and apparently cute, per Mixwell but I really couldn't say about that part. Also I'm not sure that he's doing a "god" job like Marine-blue claims ... Some of this electioneering stuff you have to take with a large grain of salt! :) Sorry I overlooked this support earlier, although I don't think you will need it! ++Lar: t/c 13:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Support Support ---Zyephyrus 13:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  178. --Turgon the dark side of a normal user 14:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  179. Support Support Juliancolton 16:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Support Support James F. (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Tiptoety talk 20:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Whence I unto my Leader: "See thou find, Some one who may by deed or name be known, And thus in going move thine eye about." - The Divine Comedy (Inferno, Canto XXIII) by Dante Alighieri Synergy 21:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Support Support -- JAn Dudík 21:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Support Support --Omega933 21:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  185. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  186. -- Seems to be objective and not to be influenced even by mainstream. For this he got my voice مبتدئ 00:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Support Support--Yopie 01:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Support Support KveD (talk) 01:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  189. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Support Support Kbthompson 14:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Support Support ESanchez013 17:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  192. Support Support Complex 19:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Support Support --Joshua Issac 19:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  194. Support Support --Hei ber 21:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Support Support (after clarifying issues with candidate, shifting from Neutral to Support.) Proofreader77 02:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  196. Support Support -- (cypsy) 10:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Support Support (not already steward ?) --Gdgourou 10:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  198. Support Support--Cp111 12:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Pjetter 12:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  200. ...Aurora... 12:18, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Support Support, our couse, very good admin im Meta and Wikibooks. ~Innvs: 12:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  202. Support Support --Jorunn 12:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  203. Support Support J.delanoygabsadds 14:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Oui Adailton 14:04, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  205. The only one I've recognized. --Sargoth 14:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  206. --Church of emacs talk 16:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  207. John Vandenberg 19:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  208. Sirabder87 21:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Strong Support Support based on direct experience of his good work on Meta. --A. B. (talk) 22:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  210. Support Support --Miya 02:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Yes...Modernist 04:08, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  212. Support Support - good egg. BD2412 T 05:07, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  213. Support Support --‍‍‍‍Komeil 4life 06:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  214. Support Support — hard working and trust-worthy. Huji 11:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  215. Support Support --Jyothis 13:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  216. Support Support OhanaUnitedTalk page 15:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  217. Support Support Rosiestep 17:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  218. Support Support --Roberta F. 18:25, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  219. --Sami Lab 22:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  220. Support Support He's been a great admin and redtapeocrat on Wikibooks English for a long while. His language schools are good (but maybe you should learn a few more just for the sake of it) and he is virtually never absent from wiki projects. He is generally fair (but a little obsessed with red tape and policies) but there is nothing I can think of that means he wouldn't make a good steward. Good luck!--Xania 23:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  221. Ja! Finn Rindahl 01:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  222. Support Support --Versageek 03:01, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  223. Support Support despite his support for blocking Mutter Erde on commons; lots of other actions make up for that. /Pieter Kuiper 09:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  224. Support Support -Bence My Talk 10:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  225. Support Support EdBever 18:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  226. Support - Wutsje 19:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  227. Support Support (Pile on) - doesn't seem needed but this user is very well respected and has the experience to be a good steward fr33kman t - c 02:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  228. Support Support a long history of "small-s stewardship" across many projects, and making that a "big S" can only help him continue to help the rest of us. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 13:17, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  229. Support Support Kzhr 15:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  230. Malinaccier (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  231. Of course. — str4nd ⇌ 04:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  232. Support Support -- PseudoOne 05:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  233. Support Support --Liangent 10:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  234. Support Support Better late than never. --MichaelMaggs 17:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  235. Support Support. Although I dislike voting templates. Microchip08 @simpleWB 21:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  236. Support Support Hubrid Noxx This guy sounds pretty good to me.
  237. Sounds good. --Capaci34 09:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  238. Support Support : candidature naturelle et évidente. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  239. Support Support--Bapti 19:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  240. ok --Rax 21:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  241. Pile-on Support Support --Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  242. Nbarth 01:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  243. Support Support - Kaare 19:52, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  244. Support Support - Drboisclair 23:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support - has blocked me elswhere, but for goodish reasons. As a one-time vandal, feel free to roam around wikiland. --Agricoleur 23:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Not elegible to vote, per account elegibility —Dferg (meta-w:es.) 12:15, 14 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]
  245. Support Support rootology (T) 04:34, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  246. Support Support--Thesupermat 10:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  247. Support Support --junafani 13:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  248. --Mayer Bruno 20:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  249. Support Support -- Harrywad 23:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  250. Support Support - A good person for the job. --Cspurrier 01:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  251. Support Support --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 15:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  252. Yerul (comlink) 18:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  253. Support SupportNatanaeel83 20:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  254. Support Support --Ante Perkovic 14:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  255. Support Support - For what its worth, it was his hostility and stubborness that in my eyes made him a perfect candidate, unlike other candidates, he will have the balls to make the decision himself rather than waiting for a "more" experienced steward to do it..he will always jump at the chance to do more work unlike the other stewards who are just too lazy. He may not be the best candidate running (seriously, who is?) but he will get the job done..I thought i had already supported him before resigning, guess not...Good luck mikey..--Cometstyles 11:08, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  256. Support Support but I have NO ide how can anyone handle this much of positions...? Do you have a job IRL? :) --OrsolyaVirág 18:11, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  257. Support. -AlexSm 15:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  258. Support Support No doubts --Mardetanha talk 21:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I like him one to one, but his sysop work on Commons has been uneven in my observation. Not enough trust in his judgment to grant stewardship. Durova 02:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. ACK Durova, ties everything up with red tape Achates 07:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Aqwis 11:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. -- Syrcro 16:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC) (ACK Durova & Achates)[reply]
  6. Ryan Postlethwaite 18:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Jusjih 01:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --ACK Durova. -- Cecil 07:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Mike is a good vandal fighter but he is rather stubborn when he thinks he is right and listening and understanding others is not his forte. Hillgentleman 13:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Mike has repeatedly deleted useful learning resources from Wikiversity and he ignored my request that he engage in a community discussion of standards for learning resources and their deletion. Mike violated Wikiversity policy by using his bot for an unauthorized purpose. A steward should respect projects. Mike's past behavior at Wikiversity indicates that he does not adequately respect Wikiversity and its community standards. --JWSurf 16:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --EvaK 19:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC) ack Durova and Achates, addiationally he shows a weird attitude towards personality rights on Commons.[reply]
    --ACK Durova, Achates and EvaK -- --KS aus F 19:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 20:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Ralf Roletschek 20:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Kaaveh Ahangar 21:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Raboe001 22:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Oppose Oppose No. Tesi1700 18:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose-- --Zeljko 23:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Ozymandias 09:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Oppose Oppose recent actions on commons make me unconfortable supporting him. I concidder his recent actions not fitting for the posizion of a steward. abf /talk to me/ 16:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose Isn't a Jobcolector? I think, Mike.lifeguard is a jobcolector. Bence My Talk 13:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for your comments, however if I were a job collector then I wouldn't have given up my oversight rights here or sysop rights on enwikiversity, nor would I have withdrawn my first RFB at enwikibooks.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 18:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. -- Sozi 15:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Oppose Oppose --Anthony Ivanoff 17:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Oppose Oppose ACK Durova. Makes spammers cry, but also unfortunate newbies who try to improve the wikis, and legitimate, non-spamming webmasters; relies solely on evidence of multiple additions of links without regard to appropriateness of the links added, and appears to refuse reconsideration. --Abd 17:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Oppose Oppose --B 20:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Martina Nolte 12:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --smial 12:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Seltsame Interpretation und teils völlige Unkenntnis von Persönlichkeitsrechten läßt mich Schlimmstes auch für andere Bereiche befürchten.[reply]
    Thanks for your comments. However, I don't think my interpretation of personality rights is at all strange or ignorant. Furthermore, I don't think it's relevant to being a steward.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 05:42, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    In deiner gleichlautenden Mail steht noch ein Satz mehr: "So, while I respect your opinion, I think it is nonsensical." -- smial 07:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --alexscho 15:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Oppose Oppose -- On the same grounds stated on his RFB at enwikibooks --Panic 00:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC) [[17]][reply]
  27. Oppose Oppose Denkbar ungeeignet. Und Mike, bitte keine Spam-Mails auf meine Adresse! --ST ○ 23:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Oppose Oppose Maedin\talk 21:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Kwj2772 (論) 09:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Oppose Oppose --Zeljko 13:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Oppose Oppose--Vatrena ptica 14:19, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Oppose Oppose --Lasta 15:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC) (User used to be --Armchoir 15:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]
  33. Mike R 17:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. -- Ra'ike 21:17, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. --FollowTheMedia 01:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Language knowledge (as per his statement) insufficient to merit my support. Otherwise an excellent candidate. -- Nahum 15:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    For what it's worth, I've been able to function reasonably well up to now with these language abilities. However, I thank you for your honest critique.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, I can only judge by what you yourself write on your statement. As I said, otherwise I think you'd make an excellent candidate. I certainly won't be sorry if you do get elected. Nahum 17:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral Neutral I'd expect more language skills Poco a poco 12:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Neutral Neutral Incomplete experience and language skills, but not a bad candidate. O. Morand 11:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

Mywood

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

同意！

  1. --百楽兎 00:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. -- OK. Marcus Cyron 01:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. From my encounter with her in zh:, she is kind, patient and responsible. She has experienced at least two cultures. She takes beautiful pictures [18]. I trust that she can learn to do her job well.Hillgentleman 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Wcam 01:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Jimmy xu wrk 01:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Ellery 03:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --长夜无风 03:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Support—『Skjackey tse』 03:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  10. --Revolus Echo der Stille 04:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. I would really like to see active Chinese stewards. Please, keep in mind that if you become a steward. --Millosh 04:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. support.--Advisory 04:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    中文维基需要你.--zasdfgbnm 12:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC+8) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 17:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Yes. bastique demandez! 06:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Sir James 06:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Avjoska 06:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Sh1019 08:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter. Confirmed by AccountEligibility Béria Lima Msg 11:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Kegns 08:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Mywood is one of the most beloved and hardworking administrators on zh-wp. Beside her work in resolving community conflicts, by which she is really good because she is trusted by most of the users as neutral and sensible, she is also heavily involved in writing articles, improving and selecting featured and excellent articles and doing translations on meta and in behalf of the foundation. Generally I would like to see more such people in Steward position. I verified the accusation about the copyright and license issues on commons and must say that most of the issues posted there were just a request of clarification. So I don't see any problem here.--Wing 09:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support--Konsnos 10:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support--Shizhao 11:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Njaelkies Lea 11:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    toonproost 13:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, no edits in any of the Wikimedia projects. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 17:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Kevinhksouth 12:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Obelix 15:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support--CuaxdonJe suis un WikiLover 17:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Support--Ahonc 20:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Fangjian 07:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Hat600 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. --Nick1915 - all you want 09:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Szalakóta 15:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --老陳 15:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Wmrwiki 16:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Ralf Roletschek 20:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 04:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Liuyujiaocn 08:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. --Nick1915 - all you want 09:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Ivan Štambuk 11:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Support Support Caiaffa 03:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support Support--Ffaarr 11:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Church of emacs talk 16:31, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. John Vandenberg 16:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support Support I hope you will working hard to develop and take care of Wikipedia. I believe you. If you will be the best one, we'll proud of you! TimShi 07:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --XmasX 12:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Support Support Keep up your good work. --Anthony Ivanoff 17:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Micpol 22:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support Support--Tomchiukc 06:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. helpful&friendly, a bit more cross-wiki-work would be nice though, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 01:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support--Rayax 03:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Ineligible. Maedin\talk 13:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support Support OhanaUnitedTalk page 14:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support Support Her contribution to (zh-)Wikipedia is impressive. She is undoubtedly a productive editor and an excellent administrator. I've never seen such a reasonable and nice person on Wikipedia like her.--Suiseiseki 15:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Nbarth 02:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Support Support: Mywood as a steward may strengthen the Chinese WP. -- Maseltov 12:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support Support：Mywood is working hard in Wikipedia, she will do better as a steward.--Smartneddy|Talk 00:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Support Support --Wikikids 03:27, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Support Support --Zeljko 08:28, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. maturalJALK 10:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. roc (talk) 17:05, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Support Support Maedin\talk 21:43, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Support SupportNatanaeel83 20:54, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Support Support Shatin 03:29, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Puntori 00:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lack of a real userpage on meta. Setting that sort of thing up would have been more indicative of a global affiliation, IMO. It may seem a silly rational, but I think it is the best test of global activity. Prodego talk 05:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. While your efforts in translations are commendable and appreciated on commons, you have too many recent copyright violations and image source problems[19] Gnangarra 08:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose Oppose Vyk 11:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. don't need to be steward to do more in cross-wiki work ... axpdeHello! 13:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Stifle 14:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --MF-W 14:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. As per Axpde. Get involved in more projects (OTRS maybe?), gain more experience, try again next year. -- Nahum 15:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. I'm sorry, though the language abilities are good, I don't see enough cross-wiki experience to support.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 18:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. NonvocalScream 21:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Nemo 21:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. not enough experience.--Flamelai 02:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Oppose Oppose — MrDolomite • Talk 15:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose Same reason as for Mardetanha: users living under authoritarian governments should not get access to checkuser rights. Habbit 19:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    This is the first time I hear that Sweden has an authoritarian government :). Hillgentleman 03:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Big oops. Seems he no longer lives in China. Objection removed. Habbit 11:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Contra. QuartierLatin1968 20:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. per Mike. Alex Pereira falaê 12:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. No. Tesi1700 17:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Oppose Oppose, I support her as a sypop and bureaucrat in Chinese Wikipedia. Howerver, I don't think she's fit for this position and has enough experience. Mywood is always devoting herself in editing articles but not managing.--1j1z2 06:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I think you said that does not conform with the facts, please see the Sysop activity on zhwiki, it can prove that she is just editing and managing.--Advisory 11:46, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Based on those zhwiki stats, Mywood is the 15th most active admin for deletion actions, and 21st highest when counting all admin actions. John Vandenberg 23:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Oppose Oppose need more experience --Gdgourou 10:37, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Cross wiki experience? ...Aurora... 12:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Oppose Oppose (weak) is well respected and has enough experience but lacks cross-wiki visability and seems to have backed off from being a normal editor (which I believe that all wikipedians should be first and foremost) fr33kman t - c 01:07, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Oppose Oppose needs more cross-wiki experience, sorry --Captain-tucker 16:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Oppose Oppose, Mywood is well-known among Chinese wikipedians for creating good articles. She is an excellent article creator and I have no doubt about that. However, as an administrator on the Chinese Wikipedia, her activities heavily concentrate on writing articles. Her involvements in other administrator-related tasks including dealing with vandalism, new page patrol, etc are very limited. I don’t see that she has enough counter-vandalism experience. She seems to lack cross-wiki experience as well. Most of her cross-wiki contributions are just simply adding interwiki links. --Cp111 17:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Oppose Oppose Experience from 2007 only --Höyhens 03:16, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Oppose Oppose Not enough experience for the moment, I think O. Morand 11:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Oppose Oppose --Techman224Talk 02:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. Neutral Neutral — neuro(talk) 01:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --FollowTheMedia 01:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I'd like to see some more cross-wiki work, though I don't feel comfortable opposing for some reason. NuclearWarfare 03:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Same as NuclearWarfare--JN 04:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sebleouf 08:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Neutral Neutral Vyk 11:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Not sure what to make out of everything. --FiliP × 12:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Uwe Gille 12:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Davecrosby uk 00:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Neutral Neutral Poco a poco 12:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Rax 21:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Neutral Neutral--Thesupermat 10:34, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Mayer Bruno 20:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

Pasquale (Pasquale G. Tatò)

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. Puntori 00:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. -- OK. Marcus Cyron 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Sir James 06:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Support Vyk 11:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --MannMaus 11:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. -- experience is not all we need Emes 17:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Szalakóta 15:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Adriano Seghezzi --93.66.80.185 19:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please log in to vote, thanks. →Na·gy 19:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Ozymandias 09:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support --87.100.100.198 12:37, 6 February 2009 (UTC) please log in to vote--Nick1915 - all you want 11:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Muro de Aguas 17:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Eduardo Aenur 21:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible to vote. --Lucas Nunes 23:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Yes, for the many languages spoken. Amikeco 22:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, for an honest person and the many languages spoken; not a woolen headed beureaucrat. User: Valid 2:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
    Please log in to vote. Daniel (talk) 08:29, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Mayer Bruno 21:00, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Höyhens 03:13, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Imho the user has not enough experience, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Thogo (talk) 00:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. An excellent user, but not suited to the Steward role at this time. Perhaps after some more work. NuclearWarfare 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. no. Micha L. Rieser 00:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Per NuclearWarfare Matt (Talk) 00:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Statement makes me believe he doesn't understand stewardship, he has only english wikipedia in mind. es:Drini 01:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose Oppose — neuro(talk) 01:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. No. Being steward had very little to do with en-Wikipedia. There is much more than en-Wikipedia within the foundation. You do very good work, but you do not need the stewardtools at all. Romaine 01:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. 6 unanswered questions suggests not responsive enough. ++Lar: t/c 02:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. bibliomaniac15 03:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Ivan Štambuk 03:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose. Prodego talk 04:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Avjoska 06:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Does not have the necessary experience yet, Taketa 09:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Brownout(msg) 10:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 11:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. →Na·gy 11:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. sorry, you need more experience ... axpdeHello! 13:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --MF-W 14:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Obelix 15:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Nahum 16:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Seems to be very little active and inexperienced: he can not even normally link to his user page — NickK 19:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. –Ejs-80 20:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. NonvocalScream 21:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Not enough experience, particularly cross-wiki, and seems to not understand what role stewards play.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. No/いいえ. --Taichi - (あ！) 03:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose, not enough experience. Sorry. LexArt 08:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 19:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Being a sysop somewhere is a definite prerequisite in my book. --FiliP × 12:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Uwe Gille 13:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Oppose Oppose — MrDolomite • Talk 15:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Merdis 19:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Contra. QuartierLatin1968 21:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --Davecrosby uk 00:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mailer Diablo 04:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Per Mike. Alex Pereira falaê 12:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. No experience and didn't serve in any position except editor so far. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Oppose Oppose need more epxerience --Gdgourou 10:38, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. No experience. ...Aurora... 12:22, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. No, per all of the above, but maybe next year. Please do get involved in cross wiki work here on meta, especially translations, and work towards adminship on a small projects like itwikisource, ptwikisource, lawiki or lawikisource - I'll be happy to help you become familiar with any of the Wikisource projects. John Vandenberg 16:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Sirabder87 21:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose no experience. Darkxsun 01:49, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible to vote --Lucas Nunes 23:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Oppose Oppose --Anthony Ivanoff 17:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Lymantria 06:16, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Oppose Oppose needs more cross-wiki/admin like experience. --Captain-tucker 16:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Rax 21:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC) lack of experience as sysop, unanswered questions[reply]
  46. Lack of admin experience. Nbarth 01:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Oppose Oppose--Thesupermat 10:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Oppose Oppose Such an impressive list of languages. Please, answer the questions and get sysop rights and come back next year. Maedin\talk 21:49, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Oppose Oppose Not even a sysop on his home wiki O. Morand 11:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Oppose Oppose - I like the fact that the candidate is multilingual, but I would like to see more cross-wiki work. Juliancolton 00:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Oppose Oppose Techman224Talk 01:05, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. --FollowTheMedia 01:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I don't beleive that a user needs to have been an admin first, but this person seems to have a lack of experience in admin-ish type behaviour, vandal fighting etc... Refraining from straight oppose due to my beliefs about not needing to be an admin first. fr33kman t - c 00:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral Neutral Great language skills but too early, next time maybe Poco a poco 12:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

PhiLiP (Philip Tzou)

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. Puntori 00:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Ivan Štambuk 00:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --百楽兎 00:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. -- OK. Marcus Cyron 01:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FollowTheMedia 01:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Wcam 01:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Jimmy xu wrk 01:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Shizhao 02:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --长夜无风 03:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. bibliomaniac15 03:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support—『Skjackey tse』 03:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  13. --Fadesga 03:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Revolus Echo der Stille 04:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Again, I would like to see active stewards who know Chinese. --Millosh 04:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Advisory 04:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support 중국어, 일본어, 한국어 화자가 사무장에게 긴급하게 요청해야 할 일이 있을 때 도움이 될 것이라고 생각합니다.--Kwj2772 05:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Sir James 06:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Avjoska 06:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Kegns 08:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Sebleouf 08:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. She is a good user.--Wmrwiki 09:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. PhiLiP is a very productive user and admin on a wide range of areas. He is a hard working admin, write quite a lot articles and and talented programmer who also works on MediaWiki. I have full trust of him.--Wing 09:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 11:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Support--CuaxdonJe suis un WikiLover 12:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Kevinhksouth 12:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    116.10.199.46 14:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    stroke not logged in vote, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 14:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    You will be a good monitor, I'm sure about it Hdfdisk 14:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 17:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Gzdavidwong 15:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Ja. — Albert Krantz¿? 16:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support Support--Ahonc 20:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Flamelai 02:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yes.--Bencmq 09:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Support ' --Ofol 11:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Szalakóta 15:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --J.Wong 17:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Ja --Ribald 17:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. --Nick1915 - all you want 09:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Ralf Roletschek 20:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Rave 22:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 04:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --I support you!Liuyujiaocn 08:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. --Nick1915 - all you want 09:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    —Forward.藏骨集团 07:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. --Nick1915 - all you want 09:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:45, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Ffaarr 11:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Support --Zeljko 16:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. John Vandenberg 16:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support Support OhanaUnitedTalk page 16:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. As with putnik, I'd prefer to see more cross-wiki experience, however I've had good (indirect) interactions with this user, and brings needed language skills to the table.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 04:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Strong Support -download | sign! 05:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support Support --Albamhandae 07:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. (+) Hillgentleman 10:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Support Support --Anthony Ivanoff 17:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support Support PhiLiP is very helpful to other wikipedians. His contribution, a system which can transform traditional chinese to or from simplified chinese, is really a great work. Also, living under an authoritarian government is not his fault, and this fact itself does not imply anything wrong with him. In fact, his style is just the opposite of that government. --Quest for Truth 00:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for your support. But I'm a male, thank you. --PhiLiP 10:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, I thought you were a female because your nickname contains "菇" which I always wrongly took as "姑"--Quest for Truth 16:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Support Support --Liangent 10:28, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Support Support--Smartneddy|Talk 07:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support--An Macanese 17:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Ineligible. Maedin\talk 13:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Support Support--Cp111 17:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Nbarth 02:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Looks like a great candidate, and opposers' arguments are unconvincing at best Storkk 03:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. -- lucasbfr talk 09:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Support Support--Wikikids 03:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Support Support--章·安德魯 11:13, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. roc (talk) 17:05, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. give u a chance, I hope you succeed--JALK 10:27, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support Support--Thesupermat 10:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Support Support --Höyhens 03:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Support Support Maedin\talk 16:43, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Support Support Nice to have Steward who knows Chinese :-D --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:31, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Support Support--Suiseiseki 18:18, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Support Support--Jusjih 02:42, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support Support He may have plenty of time as a student, and I believe he could quickly get familiar with steward's work. --Loihsin 09:21, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Support Support Shatin 03:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Not experienced enough in the right areas, IMO. NuclearWarfare 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Oppose — neuro(talk) 01:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lack of a real userpage on meta. Setting that sort of thing up would have been more indicative of a global affiliation, IMO. It may seem a silly rational, but I think it is the best test of global activity. Prodego talk 05:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. too many copyright and source issues on Commons[20] over an extend period of time, Gnangarra 08:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Most of those files were transfered from other wikis (like English Wikipedia). And some of them were just name-change issues. --PhiLiP 10:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Not experienced enough in the right areas, IMHO. Debresser 08:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. OhanaUnitedTalk page 16:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose Oppose Vyk 11:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. sorry, you need more experience ... axpdeHello! 13:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --MF-W 14:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. NonvocalScream 21:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. You don't need stewardship to contrast crosswiki vandalism and to translate. --Nemo 21:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Uwe Gille 13:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. per Commons stuff. Giggy 14:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. More experienced preferred. Majorly talk 14:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Oppose Oppose Same reason as for Mardetanha: users living under authoritarian governments should not get access to checkuser rights. Habbit 19:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    That sounds more like a political statement to me. This is as bad as "I oppose you because you live in (fill in a country name)" OhanaUnitedTalk page 15:59, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    No, that is "I oppose you becuase you live in (fill in a country name)"  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 04:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    You can't just overthrow a government with one person's power, plus it doesn't happen overnight. Asking the candidate to move and live in another country just to run for steward is a bit far-fletched. OhanaUnitedTalk page 05:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. No. per Habbit. Alefbe 20:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Contra. QuartierLatin1968 21:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Davecrosby uk 00:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. per Majorly. Alex Pereira falaê 12:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. The experience is not in the right area and the responses to user questions are slow to none. Also agree with User:Habbit. --WikiCantona 12:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Agreed with all, especially Majorly. Razorflame 20:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Sorry, you don't really seem very experienced. Regards, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Oppose Oppose No. Tesi1700 18:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. No. Per NuclearWarfare and Majorly. -- (cypsy) 10:18, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Cross wiki experience? ...Aurora... 12:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Oppose Oppose Lack of cross-wiki experience is somewhat concerning fr33kman t - c 00:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Not enough experience. Malinaccier (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Rax 21:34, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. Neutral Neutral--JN 04:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  2. Obelix 15:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. -- Abstain. Nahum 16:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Per Prodego. --FiliP × 12:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutral Neutral — MrDolomite • Talk 15:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Neutral Neutral--陈少举 02:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote because you do not meet the criteria. Your zhwiki account does not have 50 edits between 01 August 2008 and 31 January 2009 (has 11). ST47 03:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Poco a poco 12:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Mayer Bruno 21:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Neutral Neutral No real problem if elected, but experiene and language skills are not strong. O. Morand 11:53, 15 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

putnik (Sergey Leschina)

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

Успехов, Серёж!

  1. Very strong support. Very trustworthy — vvv 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Удачи, Сергей. Lvova 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. A man of few words but his support of Russian Wikipedia speaks volumes. If you know him you trust him.--Mstislavl 00:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Conditional support. Based upon the other support votes, this user seems to be a good candidate. Razorflame 00:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sure. ~ Aleksandrit 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. ОйЛ (OiL) 00:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Ivan Štambuk 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. A Russian steward might be a good idea for the smaller Russian (and related language) projects. NuclearWarfare 00:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Sure. We need a Russian-fluent steward! — Kalan ? 01:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Yaroslav Blanter 01:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Ok. macy 01:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. a russian Steward is needed. Marcus Cyron 01:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Support — neuro(talk) 01:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --FollowTheMedia 01:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. — Grenadine 01:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Strong support. EvgenyGenkin 02:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. We need you, future russian steward! Success! Николай Путин 02:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. — Kujawianin 02:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Such a large Wikipedia as russian must have a representative among stewards. Good luck! V0d01ey 02:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 17:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. I don't think forcing one to move to another wiki to something they don't want to, solely so they can get access to something they want to (and are able to) do, is a good idea. He seems competent enough. Giggy 04:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Even I don't like the fact that he didn't answer to any question, we really need stewards with active knowledge of Russian. Answer to Lar's comment here: I have very good passive knowledge of Russian, which means that I may communicate without problems with Russians who know to read English (or Serbian). However, there are a lot of existing language editions of WM projects (languages from former USSR) -- and much more to be created -- where the only known language (besides the local one) by those people is Russian. In such cases I am not very helpful. --Millosh 04:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. yes --Elzecko 05:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    yesDigmores 05:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 17:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Голосую За! --Salamatiqus 05:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, no edits in any of the Wikimedia projects. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 17:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --J.Mundo 05:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Yes. bastique demandez! 06:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Avjoska 06:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Surely. --Saə 07:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Yes.ShinePhantom 07:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. There is no doubt that he'll be a good steward. --Gruznov 07:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support Support --Boom1x 07:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Rubin16 08:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support Support --Alma Pater 08:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Very strong support!--SkyDrinker 08:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Sebleouf 08:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Remper 08:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, no edits in any of the Wikimedia projects. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 17:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --Vd437 09:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. I know him from common work on ruwikipedia. Thats why I' m sure he will be a good steward. --Obersachse 09:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Kartmen 09:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --AlbanBear 11:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 17:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --DR 09:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support Support — Iguacu • !? • ru 09:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --StSasha 10:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Согласен[reply]
  40. Support Support--Konsnos 10:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support Support --Pessimist2006 11:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 11:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Lockal 11:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Russian Wiki must have a repsentative among stewards. SkyBon 11:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Newt 11:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Vladimir Solovjev 11:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Insider 11:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Altes 12:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Denizu 12:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 17:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Александр Сигачёв 12:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. --Морган 12:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. --Loyna 12:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Da! Plati 13:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Strong support. Davemustaine 13:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. MfG Гюрги 13:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)90.186.150.241 13:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Support.--Ahonc 13:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Поддерживаю, очень нехватает русскоязычного стюарда. --sk 13:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. -- Yrogirg 13:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Cenarium (Talk) 14:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Kornilov S. 14:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 17:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. One of the most reliable users on ruwiki, capable of communicating with people, and pretty serious VanHelsing.16 14:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Вперёд. --UKR 14:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)ineligible to vote — NickK 20:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Support Support My own investigation into putnik's history shows a person who is considerate towards others, a good communicator and has a huge net positive contribution to wikimedia projects, and I would have faith in him being a most capable steward. Of course him being able to speak Russian and knowledgeable on the processes on Russian wikimedia project is also a huge bonus for the overall project. --Russavia 16:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. -- Nahum 16:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Would be a useful addition to the steward team. Rje 16:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. EugeneZelenko 16:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Guanchzhou 17:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, no edits in any of the Wikimedia projects. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 17:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. <flrn> 17:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. DENker 18:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Looks like a good candidate, and we really need Russian-speaking steward — NickK 19:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Yes. --Claymore 20:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Tat1642 20:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. --Nemo 21:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Support Support --Kjetil_r 23:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Marhorr 23:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. --Thogo (talk) 00:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Icewedge 00:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Support Support I think, putnik will be a good steward. Dinamik 00:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. John Vandenberg 02:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Support.--Burn ID 03:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Я "ЗА" Работу посмотрел и оценил... Классная работа... УДАЧИ!!! Властарь 08:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Anonymous user — vvv 13:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support, Russian steward is really needed. I khow about his work in Russian Wikipedia. He's a good candidate. LexArt 08:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 19:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Support Support per Millosh ("we really need stewards with active knowledge of Russian"), Obersachse (who has constructively resolved a dispute with the candidate), and the numerous responsible parties from ru who are supporting this candidate. -- Shunpiker 10:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Тру 10:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Ineligible — vvv 13:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. --Torin 10:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Support Support --Serg2 10:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Support Support --Ofol 11:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Strongest possible Support Support. Роман Беккер 13:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Support. AndyVolykhov 17:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Support. RyanGerbil10 18:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84. --Ralf Roletschek 20:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. --Rave 22:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. ~ Seb35 22:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87. --EvaK 23:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88. --Davecrosby uk 00:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 04:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Support Support --G00gle 08:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Support Support--Mike1979 Russia 09:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Support Support--Dias Kozhakhmetov 15:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Support. --Grebenkov 16:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Support SupportСергей Корнилов 17:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Support Support Vlsergey 19:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96. --.snoopy. ✉ 19:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support Support --Raboe001 20:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Support Support EBY3221 20:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Support Support He has a clear idea what he will use the rights for and has the experience necessary to do this; his lack of experience in other areas shouldn't count against him. AndrewRT 22:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Support Support --Wassily 14:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102. А как иначе? Deevrod 17:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103. very competent and adequate personCarn 23:41, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Support Support Caiaffa 03:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Support Support Based upon his activities in ru.wiki, he is reasonable and reliable and will make a good steward. Leonid Dzhepko --Л.П. Джепко 07:22, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Ozymandias 09:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Успехов. -- AKA MBG 09:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Support Support. Ingwar JR 11:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support. I think he would be good steward, I agree with Л.П. Джепко. The only little problem is his en-2. Kv75 12:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Support Support --Роман Янковский 12:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Support. Bence My Talk 15:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Not as much cross-wiki work as I'd like to see (generally actually doing vandalism/spam stuff is better than promising to do it in the future!) but seems trusted by those I trust, and has enough experience with Wikimedia projects beyond his home wiki, I think. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 18:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Support. --Zeljko 21:31, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Support. Ilya Voyager 17:22, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Support. --A.I. 00:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Support. Schthaxe 00:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  117. I’m not so adherent to this candidate although know him closely. But this guy thinks, while many others do not. A man with his own oppinion ever faces considerable opposition. Because some troublemakers from ru.wikipedia and Metawiki oppose him, I will support. Incnis Mrsi 10:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Support Support --Shureg 12:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Hard worker with long history. Nice to see he is now back again to be better involved into meta activities. --Aphaia 19:03, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Support Support because this person seems to be respectable and there should be at least one steward from ru fr33kman t - c 02:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Support. --Сайга20К 11:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Пусть будет так. ~ Чръный человек 22:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Support. NBS 22:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Support Support Qualified and experienced user. --Blacklake 14:18, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    угу Marc-x 16:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible to vote. --Lucas Nunes 23:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Sounds good. --Capaci34 09:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Good man.Rlu 19:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Seems good experience & v. good understanding of role. Nbarth 03:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  128. -- lucasbfr talk 09:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Support Support --Kaganer 17:51, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Support, seems to be experienced. --IndianCow 18:46, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  131. --Mayer Bruno 21:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Support Support --Höyhens 03:02, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Good candidate --Fabexplosive The archive man 08:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Support. He is a great wikipedian and responsible person. He is really technically skilled. By the way, he is also co-founder of Wikimedia RU. Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 12:45, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    So, putnik is a co-founder of the fund that you chair? This does not sound good because of a possible conflict of interest. I remember that :ru:User:Udacha who dared to criticize your fund was indefinitely blocked at ru.wikipedia.org -- an obvious conflict of interests. Very possibly similar conflicts will happen if putnik is elected. Does he gain personal income from the operations of your fund? SA ru 15:26, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Support Support Maedin\talk 16:45, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Support Support I'm persuaded because the the arguments of this candidature are solid. Andrzej19 21:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Yerul (comlink) 18:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  138. --Stef Mec 19:48, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Support Support --Komeil 4life 13:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Support SupportNatanaeel83 20:57, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Support Support Good luck!
    — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Christian Hartmann (talk) diff, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 17:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Ochkarik 13:19, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Support Support Dorgan 11:20, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Support Support We'll see... --OrsolyaVirág 18:47, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  145. --Bengoa (My user talk) 15:08, 21 February 2009 (UTC) ♣§[reply]
  146. I know him as a very accurate and responsible person. -AlexSm 15:36, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Andrei Romanenko 17:14, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  148. --Agent001 20:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Good luck! --Mitrius 20:29, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Full support -- Wulfson 21:17, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Support Support --Mardetanha talk 21:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Wind 23:24, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Puntori 00:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. We do have Millosh at ru-2 and Paginazero at ru (but we may well lose Paginazero due to inactivity) so we are not completely Ru-less... but yes, ru is an important language to have coverage in. Also good availability and approach. That said... did not respond to questions, which is concerning, and may be somewhat inexperienced, having never had any bits other than admin near as I can tell. ++Lar: t/c 03:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    If you read his statement more carefully, you’ll see that the candidate is an experienced OTRS member. — Kalan ? 03:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I did notice that, and consider OTRS experience helpful as a sign of trust by the foundation (if not by communities, since it's granted by WMF representatives) but I don't count it as a "bit" like 'crat, OV, or CU... I think getting at least one of those really shows that some community trust is in place... The not responding to questions is a deal breaker for me, at least for now. ++Lar: t/c 03:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Community of Russian Wikipedia is reluctant to give such flags: a significant portion of opposes is commented like “I trust this user, but we already have enough of these”. Oversights and checkusers are appointed by the arbitration committee (checkusers write a request when they have a consensus that they need some reinforcement), where Putnik has refused to participate because he is interested primarily in other activities rather than dealing with local issues of this kind. — Kalan ? 03:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    There are other wikis where one can contribute besides ru:wp. Commons always welcomes hard workers and can always use people with language skills other than english. I shan't belabor this point further but I am not against reevaluating my opinion as the election progresses, if it's warranted, and assuming I am not badgered too hard. ++Lar: t/c 03:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    There are users, who speak bether russian then english (I also) There are many users in east-europe, who speak bad english but good russian. --Ralf Roletschek 20:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. per Lar. Prodego talk 04:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --MF-W 14:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Micpol 18:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Vertigo12 18:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Per Lar, not enough experience for me. Majorly talk 19:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. NonvocalScream 21:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. oppose. I am not sure, that he can be a stable reliable steward. He has really a good contribution as a sysop of ru-wiki, but he (1) has difficulty to find contacts with collegues, therefore he prefers to initiate a conflict without attemp to start a discussion. In the sommer of 2008 [21] he was initiated a large Wheel war because of it.(2) He tried also leave the project; it was written on his talk pages that he has no interest to the Wikipedia project. (3) I am afraid, that he should not be able to keep friendly and enough diplomatic communication with users from 100 different wiki-projects worldwide, because of very poor communication skill inside russian wiki. TheNeon 21:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    If you are writinig about putnik's "difficulty to find contacts with collegues" how would you explain that 12 Russian sysops (1/5 of total number), including 2 checkusers (one of them an arbiter) are voting for him? "The large wheelwar" you are mentioning wouldn't even be a wheelwar by English Wikipedia standarts. 2)Those who did not try at some point to leave Wikipedia can throw a stone at putnik - I can't.3) Being a Commons sysop he's already in contact with wikipedians from a hundred different countries and no complaints so far.--Mstislavl 21:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    It is actually good that you mentioned these checkusers. Kv75 and DR, right? I've caught both in falsifications. They attributed to me some accounts that did not have any intersections with my IP addresses (and I gave them my IP). I do not think that having checkusers who make false statements vote for this guy, putnik, makes his case stronger. Do you? SA ru 15:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    It was no direct announce about his election in ru-wiki, therefore so high support in one day is looking as a good off-line coordination. I do not think it to be very good TheNeon 22:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    ru:Википедия:Форум/Архив/Новости/2009/02#Выборы стюардов 2 Lvova 22:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    There are no his name in the announce. :-( TheNeon 22:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    где от нашего раздела баллотируется putnik. If you accuse, be attentively, please. Lvova 23:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I did not saw it, but in any case it is very strange in 10 hours after this announce (before 12:00) so much votes - normally users of russian wiki are not so active TheNeon 23:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Tsssss, THEY can heard us! Lvova 23:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    That was me who made the announcement on ru-wiki, and I am typically making announcements on ru-wiki concerning all important meta-issues. I am pretty sure I did not discuss the candidate with anybody, nor did I express my opinion on the candidate in the announcement in any way.--Yaroslav Blanter 06:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. high danger for wikipedia. This user is instigator of sysop war ([22] - in Russian)--Dr Jorgen 21:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    It was me, who appealed to the arbitration committee. And it's me who supports him now, because we have learned a lot and now that old story is forgotten. --Obersachse 22:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Ты имеешь в виду, что putnik больше не использовал административные возможности, чтобы получить преимущество в споре с тобой? И всё? Смотрю аргументы "за" - их два 1) we need Russian-fluent steward и 2) он хорошо технически подготовлен. Этическую же оценку действиям putnik'а никто не даёт, впрочем никто из поддерживающих его не отрицает факт злоупотребления им своих полномочий. И что дальше? Читаю: Стюарды обладают возможностью произвольно изменять уровень доступа для учётных записей всех проектов фонда «Викимедиа», а именно присваивать и отзывать технические права администратора, бюрократа, стюарда, проверяющего или бота на любом проекте, а также права oversight. Получается, что самое лучшее для участника, который злоупотреблял своими полномочиям - дать ему ещё больше полномочий (особенно если участник технически хорошо подготовлен? Прямо как в басне Крылова: И щуку бросить в воду. --Dr Jorgen 14:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Пожалуйста, не делай вид, что я не говорила тебе, что читать надо на самом деле Stewards policy. Lvova 00:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    На что я заметил, что моих познаний в языке не хватает для чтения "юридических" текстов. Или текст уже перевели на русский язык? --Dr Jorgen 12:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Напоминаю примерный ход разговора: "он же сможет делать то-то и то-то!" - "на самом деле, стюардам запрещено делать так в таких-то и таких-то случаях" - "а тут этого не написано!" - "а на самом деле надо читать там". Ты не веришь мне на слово, что запрещено делать то, чего ты боишься? Там не юридическая лексика, всё такими же простыми участниками писалось. Lvova 14:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    За одного битого двух небитых дают. The burnt child dreads the fire. --Obersachse 18:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    A note about :ru:User:Obersachse who is campaigning here for Putnik. He indeed was one of the participants of the sysop war with Putnik, and it was concluded that they both violated the rules. The support of another rule violator is hardly a valid argument. Curiously, Obersachse's sysop flag was recently removed for yet another violation. Obersachse also deleted the article "Putin's kiss of the boy Nikita" (an event quoted in many books) with the following argumentation: "What if somebody else kissed Nikita on the stomach, not Putin? Deleted". After all that, I doubt that Obersachse's endorsement of Putnik is very strong. SA ru 23:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. per неон. --ВиКо 22:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Strong oppose. Putnik participated in a flesh mob (signed an insulting "collective letter"). His behavior at JukoFF's elections is borderline to wiki-stalking. He also deleted the article "Don't be a dick in Wiki-projects" despite the prevalent opinion of his opponents. SA ru 03:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Not eligible for voting — vvv 13:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Strong oppose. Because IRC conspiracy.//Berserkerus 10:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Bravo, bravo, carry on. When they're not chatting about random nonsense on IRC, they're secretly plotting the downfall of those unwilling to join them. Lvova 10:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I saw how he insulted many wiki-users on IRC-channel. Of course its not "random nonsense", but its cause mistrust.//Berserkerus 10:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. JukoFF 12:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. I disagree with Putnik's candidature, because his behavior raises doubts about his readiness. --Dimitris 13:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Uwe Gille 14:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Ashwinr 18:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Contra. QuartierLatin1968 21:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hargau 05:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. per Lar. Alex Pereira falaê 12:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Was neutral but recent Putnik's comments in ruwiki (discussion regarding elections) on reasonable critics of his actions pushed me to vote "NO". Steward has to have skills to be more patient in his communications with colleges.--Poa 14:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Strong oppose. Because IRC conspiracy.нам нужны --Jaro.p 15:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Ineligible to vote. AndyVolykhov 15:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Strong oppose. Tesi1700 17:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Strong oppose. Currently, there are obviously wars between sysop&area clans in Russian Wiki (look at this (rus) and this(rus), for instance), with all sides using flashmob tactics, that flare up tensions. Moreover, it turns out that registered user accounts of most tough and distinguished sysops may at the same time be located on one the same computer with accounts of most noxious vandals that are indefinitely blocked (and there is nothing done to cover that blackhole). Therefore, I strongly suggest to elect NOBODY from Russian Wiki as a steward until the situation is improved (half year maybe), because this would clearly be a threat to the whole Wiki Project. Sorry. Nickpo 11:38, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, your generalization is not correct. Your links are arbitration cases related to one sysop. And of course flashmob tactics can not be useful in arbitration cases. Your statement about vandals concerns the same sysop. So there is no reason for generalization. And last but not least, the candidate is not related to these incidents. Kv75 12:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, his generalization is correct. For example, you are a checkuser at ru.wiki, and you falsified the results of your inquiry this summer by attributing me an account that did not belong to me. The same story repeated recently; you participated again. Putnik is not as bad as you. He did not falsify anything, but he stalked JukoFF, and he signed an attack letter. He cannot be trusted. SA ru 23:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Up to you of course, but to me (as a ru.wp admin) this looks like blatant overgeneralization. I am pretty sure my account is not located on any computer used by any blocked users (or, to this end, any ru.wp users at all). I am not aware of any indications that the candidate uses (or have ever used) a shared account, quite the opposite.--Yaroslav Blanter 12:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Even the one and only case is enough for total extreme unsecurity. One's more: sorry, but. Nickpo 12:58, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    You are repeatedly stating that there is more than one case, this is simply untrue. And, please, don't try to quote The Famous Vandal that he keeps half of ruwiki admins in his pocket. I can see that recent AK ruling against your trolling in Russian wikipedia did not cover all the bases, pity--Mstislavl 20:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Recent Arbitration Committee ruling, you say? Recently :ru:User:Wulfson first blocked for no reason and then insulted :ru:User:Lvova in most outrageous way, and this Arbitration Committee concluded that it was OK for an administrator to insult people. I agree with Nickpo. Nobody from ru.wiki can be trusted as a steward. SA ru 23:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    It's impossible to stay half-virgin or to commercialize in an underhand way 5 metres of state border only and say 'Hey! Look at the safe rest of it! We are brave board guard! Don`t care!' ...You know what is it. M-a-f-i-a. Nickpo 03:02, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Mafia is too strong of a word. They are more like Воронья слободка. SA ru 15:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Sobol2222 18:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Yakudza 22:33, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Gdarin | talk 08:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. -- Sozi 15:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Oppose Oppose OhanaUnitedTalk page 16:07, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Strong oppose as per Nickpo and others. --Anthony Ivanoff 17:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Strongly oppose.Jamiebijania 05:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible to vote. --Lucas Nunes 23:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Oppose Oppose Poco a poco 12:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Oppose as Nickpo --Cinik 13:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Oppose Oppose per Lar --Wikikids 03:05, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Oppose Oppose Picus viridis 11:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Oppose Oppose--Thesupermat 10:43, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Oppose Oppose --Stoljaroff 08:35, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Oppose Oppose Not enough information about sysop experience, and no real needs. O. Morand 11:55, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. I am not sure, that he can be a good steward Track13 19:42, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Starken dagegen. Wir kennen zu sehen da der Flashmob dem russisch IRC-Gesellschaft, auch bekannt als NSDAP (Neutral Systemend Digital Administratoren Partei), welche stimmt um Putnik zum Spaß. --Deutscher Friedensstifter 20:42, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. per JukoFF. --Amarhgil 21:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. To tell there's no Russian steward and that for one should vote for you is almost a reason to give a contra. There is justice nor equality in tokenism. --Revolus Echo der Stille 04:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Sir James 06:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral Neutral Vyk 11:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Obelix 15:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Don't know what to make out of all this. --FiliP × 12:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Neutral Neutral — MrDolomite • Talk 15:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --HalanTul 23:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. ...Aurora... 12:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Taichi - (あ！) 06:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Rax 21:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

SpeedyGonsales

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

  1. Puntori 00:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. We need more Stewards in south-slavic languages. Strongly support --Seha 00:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. yes. of course, In my opinion, he's the best wiki-admin. --Zeljko 01:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support — neuro(talk) 01:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Moving to oppose. — neuro(talk) 17:47, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --FollowTheMedia 01:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. I know Speedy for three years personally and I may say that his experience in conflict resolution is very significant. While conflict resolution is not the main task of stewards, it is really good to have persons with such profile with us. And, of course, he has enough of technical experiences. --Millosh 04:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Avjoska 06:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Sir James 06:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Sebleouf 08:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support Support my strong support--CERminator 08:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Vd437 09:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support er hat auch meine ganze Unterstützung. Wir brauchen wirklich noch Stewards welche unsere Südslawische Probleme und Sprachen kennen. Branka France 09:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. yes. --StSasha 10:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Saxum 10:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Vyk 11:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC) (changed to oppose —Pathoschild)[reply]
  15. Support Support--D tom 11:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support --zhile™ 11:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --MannMaus 11:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support -- Jure Grm, 1st day of month February, in the year of Our Lord 2009, 12:30 o'clock (UTC)
    Support Support -- As an user from sr Wikipedia, I have always received prompt assistance from this user during my work on hr Wikipedia. --Bonč 13:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    This user does not have 600 edits before 01 November 2008 (has 336). micki talk 20:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support --Smooth O 15:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support --Brest 15:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Obelix 15:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --frk@ 16:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support----Lunna 17:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Support --F.G. 18:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Support--Donatus 19:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support Support Last, but not the least. A great human being and a devoted wikipedian. --Mario Žamić 20:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Nemo 21:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Lvova 22:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support Support --Lasta 07:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC) (ex. user --Armchoir, SUL account in creation)[reply]
  30. --P@d@w@ne 09:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support Support --Ofol 11:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. yes. -- Mark Wolf 12:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Know him personally. Trusted --FiliP × 12:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Support Support - give man a chance :) --Ante Perkovic 12:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Uwe Gille 14:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support Support --Flopy 14:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Szalakóta 15:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --95.33.71.33 18:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC) (anonymous user —Merdis)[reply]
  38. ~ Seb35 22:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. strong Support Support --Drozgovic 22:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. --HalanTul 23:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support Support - Gonzales is O.K.--Dario Zornija 13:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support Support- Diversity is good . user is trusted and has my trustNatanaeel83 14:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Support Support --misos 15:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support Support --‍‍Komeil 4life 16:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support —Tomaird (talk) 17:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    This user does not have 600 edits before 01 November 2008. micki talk 20:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support Support--Inauditous,4 February 2009 (UTC)
  46. Support Support --Roberta F. 17:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Support Support --Amir 17:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support Support --Modra 19:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC) My eligibility[reply]
  49. Support Support Caiaffa 03:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Support Support --Саша Стефановић 11:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. John Vandenberg 19:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support Support--Goldfinger50 21:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 21:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    President of Wikimedia Serbia. I added details. --Millosh 09:58, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Weak Support Support. Bence My Talk 13:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support--Goldfinger50 14:49, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Vote already counted. --Millosh 14:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Support Support -- Kubura 16:54, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Support Support -- Modzzak 20:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Support Support--Pavo 22:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Support Support --Kralizec! 01:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Support Support --micki talk 08:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support --Croq 16:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    This user does not have 600 edits before 01 November 2008. micki talk 20:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support Support Multilingual. Reasonable answers to questions. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 18:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Support Support Andrej Šalov 19:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Support Support — Krstulović 19:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Support Support --Wayiran 19:48, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Support Support Kurtelacić 22:49, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support REbener 00:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    This user does not have 600 edits before 01 November 2008. micki talk 20:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Support Support fr33kman t - c 00:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support Support --Tom 02:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Support Support --Daniel73480 11:10, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Support Support --VKokielov 15:10, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support --Sauly 20:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
    This user voted twice. See bellow. He/she voted here as anonymous user. micki talk 20:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Support Support I am glad to see a steward from the Balkans. Regards from Macedonian --MacedonianBoy 20:28, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Support Support --Abyssus 21:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Support Support -- Vodomar
  71. Seems very experienced, committed, and thoughtful. Nbarth 02:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Congratulations for involment since 2004. Consistent efforts create luck. So let you be lucky, by choice. And be happy... --Copyleft 10:13, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    It seems this user made less than 600 edits before 01 November 2008. --micki talk 20:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Support Support: Why not. -- Maseltov 12:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Support Support E.coli 21:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Support Support --Lipice 16:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Support Support--Thesupermat 10:41, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Support Support --Sauly 12:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. --Mayer Bruno 21:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Support Support --Höyhens 03:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Support Support Maedin\talk 16:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Support Support No problem, good language skills. O. Morand 11:58, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Support Support --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Support Support He gave a nice presentation at the third wikimedia conference in Belgrade (20th December last year).--Metodicar 23:45, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:15, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Support Support Vedran12 15:11, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Support Support Of course, I hope he will be a fine steward (sorry for my broken English).--Vatrena ptica 12:12, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Support Support--Man Usk 15:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Support Support --Mardetanha talk 21:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Abdullah Harun Jewel 01:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 01:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Thogo (talk) 00:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Ivan Štambuk 00:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. NuclearWarfare 00:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. -- Every community have its needs, and I hope that our example can help some other similar communities, because rules and ways in effect on big Wikipedias are not easily adapted to small communities. - do you really had understand, what Stewards do? Marcus Cyron 01:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. No. Nothing about what is stewardship about. Being steward doesn't mean you get promoted! We need active stewards! Romaine 01:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    How you concluded that I'm not, or will not be active? SpeedyGonsales 10:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    As you do not describe what stewardship is about, it seems to me that activity still has to come on steward and related matters. Romaine 13:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Not while this kind of thing goes on on hrwiki. I understand it's not Speedy's personal thing, but he is one of the leaders. --Dzordzm 02:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Not a bad set of experiences so far but I feel maybe a bit more seasoning? Also, did not respond to questions. ++Lar: t/c 03:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Prodego talk 04:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    No. Doesn't seem to grasp what stewards do. LOLthulu 05:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 01:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Achates 07:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Doesn't seem really experienced to me. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 08:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Strong oppose. Sevral times I asked him for help (example), since he is a bureaucrat, but the request was never responded to. On the other side, once I said they (hr.wp) bug me with a routine (but I did it nevertheless), I got a very agile warning from him, telling such comments will be tolerated once and never again. 本 Mihajlo [ talk ] 09:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Brownout(msg) 10:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Sorry, maybe next year... →Na·gy 11:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --MF-W 14:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. I don't like the way he deals with conflict situations. The latest example is this. --BokicaK 15:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. -- Nahum 16:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. NonvocalScream 21:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Jan eissfeldt 22:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Tim Q. Wells 23:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --j.budissin 14:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Oppose Oppose — MrDolomite • Talk 15:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Oppose Oppose Vyk 15:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Contra. QuartierLatin1968 21:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Davecrosby uk 00:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Poupou l'quourouce 14:41, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Tesi1700 17:45, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Strongly oppose. See the last paragraph of this talk section, about my assessment. Alefbe 11:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. [23] i.e. is not the conversational style I would expect from a steward--Martina Nolte 12:49, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Rax 21:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Mais non. votre nom m'offense; tout ma famille est colombienne. Avriette 23:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    This user does not have 50 edits between 01 August 2008 and 31 January 2009 (has 23). micki talk 20:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Oppose Oppose per Mercy--Wikikids 03:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Oppose Oppose — neuro(talk) 17:47, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Oppose Oppose --ysangkok 22:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. strong oppose I have seen how this user acts on local projects, and I am suspicious of his ability to be neutral steward :( He hardly hides the fact that users from Serbia are unwelcome on Croatian language Wikipedia, has done nothing (with his great influence on that project) to stop prosecution of users from Serbia on hr.wiki (known issue), and has in fact himself blocked Serbian users for longer period of time, without proper warnings and for very unclear reasons. For example, look here. -- Obradovic Goran 00:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Trolls are blocked on any wiki. And if I would prosecuting users from Serbia they wouldn't vote for me, but sadly for you, truth is not what you are writing (and that can be checked easily on this very page). Moreover, your accusations are both incorrect and distasteful. SpeedyGonsales 21:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Do You remember this case? Darko Maksimović was blocked indefinitely, supposedly for trolling (where?). We all clarified that the block was unjust and that was serious violation of admin rights, but You didn't do anything to fix the injustice. --BokicaK 05:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Trolls are blocked on any wiki. Actually, we're speaking about well respected contributor with years long experience. If you believe that this user is a troll, then your intolerance towards users from Serbia is the least of your problems.. you seem to have quite creative definition of the term troll. I'm afraid to ask for your definition, since it is probably something along the lines a troll is a user that I find unwelcome, so I block him. Anyway, I suggest you to read some more documentation and help pages, and maybe to run on elections next year when you learn basics of Wikipedia policies :( -- Obradovic Goran 18:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    The fact that some of the Serbian language Wikipedia contributors voted for you is no argument in your favor. Some of them are completely unaware of your actions on hr.wiki (since they do not visit hr.wiki), and are voting for you along the personal line - it should be noted that you have visited Belgrade on several occasions and met Serbian Wikipedians. On all those meetings, you have been very friendly and open, and that is why some of them have voted for you. Even I thought that you are quite OK guy, and was shocked to see your actions on your home Wikipedia :( Other reason for votes from Serbia is the fact that Wikimedia Serbia is trying hard to bring the relations among the Balkan Wikipedias to a higher level (which is the reason you're being invited to Belgrade every year). I know for a fact that some of those votes for you came only after voters calculated that you will not pass on these elections, so there is no harm in voting for you (and shows good faith of the Serbian community). -- Obradovic Goran 18:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, some of us voted for Speedy, but this only proves that the Serbs are not intolerant. However, no one was happy because of those incidents related the Crni Bombarder and Darko. -- Metodicar 18:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Oppose Oppose OhanaUnitedTalk page 14:05, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. I'm sorry, it's not clear to me that you have a good idea of what stewards do or what would make a good one. I don't see the sort of experience I'd like to see in candidates, and I don't think your response to challenges on that point helped you.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:39, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 11:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Garfieldairlines 15:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Mailer Diablo 04:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Alex Pereira falaê 12:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. ...Aurora... 12:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Poco a poco 12:14, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Taichi - (あ！) 06:36, 9 February 2009 (UTC)View vote page[reply]

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2009/votes&oldid=24686393"