Steward requests/Global permissions
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).
Quick navigation:Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests for global rollback permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Requests for global sysop permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global sysop for Renvoy
- Global user: Renvoy (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 13 July 2022 10:25 UTC
Hello everyone! I would like to file this request for obtaining GS right. I have been a member of SWMT for a considerable time now, fighting vandalism across hundreds of projects. I frequently appear on GSR and SRG pages, cooperating with many users on that matter and status of global sysop would definitely help that. Outside my cross-wiki actions, I am sysop on Ukrainian Wikibooks and in February-March, I conducted a successful temporary adminship on a major project - Ukrainian Wikipedia. I hope I am trusted enough for this role. Thanks.--reNVoy (user talk) 10:25, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose You are elected/acting as an admin on Ukrainian Wikipedia only for one months, also your adminship in ukwikibooks has not passed one years. For my view, i think you have need more administrative experience. Thanks for volunteering —MdsShakil (talk) 12:33, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose not enough experience with administrator tools. I suggest you try to become a permanent sysop on any content projects first. — xaosflux Talk 13:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support. I can support this user. During this short time that he was a temporary administrator he made many useful adminactions. In general, Renvoy is a competent user who will definitely not have problems with these buttons, and given his frequent requests to global sysops, this will greatly facilitate his work and benefit the community. --Mykola talk 15:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Many good requests at GSR (~450), but your crosswiki matrix is on the low side. You are also a bit inexperienced as a sysop, as mentioned by MdsShakil and Xaosflux. I can't support for now, but will not oppose either. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 17:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC){{neutral}}
- Weak support I changed my mind. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 12:54, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Neutral / Weak support agree with NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh, but I think Renvoy can be trusted with GS rights overall --Johannnes89 (talk) 17:21, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support Per Mykola7, Renvoy is a trusted user and GR. AlPaD (talk) 05:34, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Concerns with limited sysop experience. Would probably support a future run however. -FASTILY 07:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support, as I am familiar with the user from his involvement in Ukrainian projects, per Mykola7, I am sure that the user is both trusted and experienced enough, both technically and socially to wield the rights. --Base (talk) 18:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Strong oppose per above.--Victor Trevor (talk) 18:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)- Support --Victor Trevor (talk) 20:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Support (changed !vote, see below 16:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)) I do think that people with GS should hold sysop rights on one wiki, but there is a ton of crosswiki experience and SWMT work that push me towards support. Neutral at the moment but would strongly support if Renvoy had sysop on a wiki. Thank you for volunteering. --Ferien (talk) 18:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC){{neutral}}
- @Ferien well, I am sysop on a wiki actually or do you mean something else by this? reNVoy (user talk) 16:06, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- No sorry, I hadn't seen the part about you being a temporary admin above. I don't see any problem in you having GS rights now. --Ferien (talk) 16:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Ferien well, I am sysop on a wiki actually or do you mean something else by this? reNVoy (user talk) 16:06, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 02:46, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Maybe when you have more administrative experience. -Alabama- (talk) 02:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose not now 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 16:24, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Neutral per above need more experience as a sysop. Hasan (talk) 17:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Neutral Can be trusted with GS rights, but more experience as a sysop on a content project would be favourable. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 17:07, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - I think Renvoy will become a good GS in the future, but would like to see some more administrative experience. --Daniuu (talk) 21:42, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Personally I see no problem with the lack of adminship on big projects, and know (of) multiple users who were appointed global sysops without being a local sysop anywhere. All I see is good experience with crosswiki patrolling over an extended period of time, including lots of requests on the relevant venues, and no other reason for concern. Therefore I support. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 02:31, 3 July 2022 (UTC) - 1234qwer1234qwer4 summed my views on the Global Sysop prerequisites perfectly. I do like to see extensive sort of cross-wiki counter-vandalism activity and a good amount of SRG reports. Technical toolset experience can be gained through the Global Rollbackers role or a combination of local rollbacker and/or sysop. In other words, one or the other. A Global Sysop is, after all, acts as a sysop on opted-in wikis with few active local sysops or no local sysops, so, by definition, I'm not certain why we'd need to require local sysop on at least one wiki. Sure, it can be useful for identifying technical proficiency, but it is not the only method for this. So, as with 1234qwer1234qwer4, I support per the same rationale. Dmehus (talk) 03:05, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Weak support Per above. Need more experience.↠Tanbirzx (✉) 18:54, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Xaosflux --Ameisenigel (talk) 07:52, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support per NDKDD. —Svārtava (t/u) • 16:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. Need more admin experience. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 17:19, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support strong xwiki/swmt experience. Local adminship is not a prerequisite, the role of global sysop is quite different. – Ajraddatz (talk) 02:32, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Base. Vermont 🐿️ (talk) 16:59, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support * Pppery * it has begun 17:03, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support the argument that lack of adminship on major wikis doesn't qualify this use doesn't hold water. GS don't act in true sysop capacity in active communities. We're basically an uncontroversial clean up crew (spam, vandalism, spamdalism) and I'd argue that global rollback has way more "power" and room for inappropriate use than GS on it's own and this user already has GR, so short of this user deleting every GS wikis main page, I can't imagine them actually misusing it or needing "major wiki" admin experience to use said tools. Praxidicae (talk) 17:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support GS is a technical rights (not social) and not a big deal. Do we have doubts about his good faith? Or that he will not understand how works three buttons of admin interface to delete spam and block vandals? Or what is his definition of "spam" and "vandals"? (let's look at his GSR reports — 314 in 2022).—Iluvatar (talk) 19:55, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support User is competent and I know of many GS who are not sysops anywhere --MeganB... …till the end 07:12, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Synoman Barris Many? (Noting that there is exactly one GS that is not a sysop anywhere else) — xaosflux Talk 14:46, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- FTR, I'm not a "real" sysop anywhere. Praxidicae (talk) 18:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Yep, there are 2 of you that are "only" sysop on coordinating wikis (outreach, mediawikiwiki). — xaosflux Talk 18:47, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, bad wording I meant "some" --MeganB... …till the end 19:16, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- From the former GSs, at least Esteban16 and Ajraddatz were appointed without being local sysops either. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:50, 7 July 2022 (UTC)- Hoo man was also elected without being a content wiki admin, and I think Vogone was as well. Definitely have been a few of us over the years ;-) – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- From the former GSs, at least Esteban16 and Ajraddatz were appointed without being local sysops either. ~~~~
- Not that it matters much, but unless you are talking about permanent sysops, this does not seem to be the case unless I'm missing something. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:02, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, bad wording I meant "some" --MeganB... …till the end 19:16, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Yep, there are 2 of you that are "only" sysop on coordinating wikis (outreach, mediawikiwiki). — xaosflux Talk 18:47, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- FTR, I'm not a "real" sysop anywhere. Praxidicae (talk) 18:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Synoman Barris Many? (Noting that there is exactly one GS that is not a sysop anywhere else) — xaosflux Talk 14:46, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Neutral Vincent Vega msg? 22:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose ~ Noman☆(talk) 11:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support trusted user. --Assyrtiko (talk) 14:35, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Requests for global rename permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global rename for 511KeV
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: 511KeV (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 6 July 2022 08:21 UTC
Hi everyone. Hope you all are doing well. I am here to request global rename permission to assist rename requests. I want to mostly focus on Ks Wiki, Ks Wikitionary and meta. I contribute to multiple projects including enwiki, kswiki, meta and others. I am also acting admin at ks wiki and a VRT member. I hope this tool can prove helpful. Rest assured, I won't misuse it. Thanks. 511KeV (talk) 08:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support OK. —Svārtava (t/u) • 12:32, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support Trusted user AlPaD (talk) 16:04, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Question: just for knowing, kswiki/Ks Wikitionary has any established renameing Venue like d:Q4026973. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thankyou MdsShakil for your questions. We collectively use Admin noticeboard for a vide range of discussion. However we will create a separate page for this at Renaming Users. I have started the work and it will be completed in some days. 511KeV (talk) 17:53, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Obviously administrator noticeboard is not useing for place rename request, i was little wonder that your linked page was just created after my question. —MdsShakil (talk) 05:13, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- For sure, Admin noticeboard is not the correct venue for such requests but in past Admin noticeboard has been used for a variety of requests. Yes, the page was created after your asked about it on the local ks Wiki as I also think such requests should be documented on a separate page. 511KeV (talk) 05:43, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the answer. I suggest you to answer directly of any questions at this type discussion in the future without any hesitation. Support and best wishes —MdsShakil (talk) 13:41, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- For sure, Admin noticeboard is not the correct venue for such requests but in past Admin noticeboard has been used for a variety of requests. Yes, the page was created after your asked about it on the local ks Wiki as I also think such requests should be documented on a separate page. 511KeV (talk) 05:43, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Obviously administrator noticeboard is not useing for place rename request, i was little wonder that your linked page was just created after my question. —MdsShakil (talk) 05:13, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thankyou MdsShakil for your questions. We collectively use Admin noticeboard for a vide range of discussion. However we will create a separate page for this at Renaming Users. I have started the work and it will be completed in some days. 511KeV (talk) 17:53, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support. --Mykola talk 11:10, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Ferien (talk) 11:17, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support Why not? --Victor Trevor (talk) 11:46, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support No issue --Superpes15 (talk) 23:16, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- Weak oppose due to lack of being a permanent admin on any projects, and wanting to focus on requests from ...meta and others... so, basically from "everywhere"?? — xaosflux Talk 13:28, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note that these were listed as the projects the user is active in, as explicitly opposed to what projects they want to focus on as part of their global renamer duties. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:44, 1 July 2022 (UTC)- The thing is it's global user right so even if someone says they will handle request from their project, after getting they end up at totally unrelated venues. A prime example is enwiki's local page and I've seen people doing this. This only creates more problems as not everyone is aware of policies of each projects. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 00:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- My primary oppose is the lack of being a permanent admin on any projects part - in general I look for someone to take on that sort of role in a content project before being a GR. — xaosflux Talk 18:03, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note that these were listed as the projects the user is active in, as explicitly opposed to what projects they want to focus on as part of their global renamer duties. ~~~~
- Support. ≈ MS Sakib «TalK» 15:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Noman☆(talk) 18:38, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
-FASTILY 07:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC){{Support}}
- Oppose per above. Concerns with lack of permanent adminship on any project. -FASTILY 01:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per xaoflux. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 02:45, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose No permanent adminship but most importantly I don't see them active at venues they intend to help, especially meta. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 00:26, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 17:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 07:53, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per xaosflux and 1997kB. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 17:23, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support -J. Ansari Talk 17:32, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Not done There is not sufficient consensus to promote 511KeV to a global renamer. The policy requires a support margin of at least 80 % for promotion, and this request doesn't meet that criteria. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 08:06, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Global rename for QueerEcofeminist
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: QueerEcofeminist (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 7 July 2022 14:21 UTC
- I have user account creator rights on mrwiki, testwiki and I have used those rights for various events and on enwiki as part of acc team. Additionally part of my anti spam and vandal work I have reported 320+ accounts for indef block only on enwiki under username policy violation. As well as numerous abusive usernames(a good number of out of my 400+ requests for gblock) for global lock too. I am also sysop on mrwikisource and mrwikibooks. So, I am aware of enwiki, commonswiki and global policy on username and rename. I know, What a is the abusive, problematic, and non-acceptable username for sure now. I would like to help with requests coming from Indic wikis. Having said all this, I know that I won't misuse the tool. thanks.QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 14:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support Trusted user AlPaD (talk) 16:04, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support LGTM —MdsShakil (talk) 16:26, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support trusted user --Johannnes89 (talk) 20:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support Why not? --Victor Trevor (talk) 22:29, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support. --Mykola talk 01:04, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support Trusted--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:48, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Ferien (talk) 16:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support. --Baggaet (talk) 03:51, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Question, QueerEcofeminist, our discussion at WP:UAA about CellGuru got archived before you had a chance to respond. I'm concerned you're seeing promotional usernames where they aren't. How will you respond when confronted with users from wikis where corporate usernames are allowed? Cabayi (talk) 08:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yes. I agree with you about this particular case of w:en:User:CellGuru that I was wrong/If we would have waited then we might have received more evidence too, but we stopped them at userspace only. I am sure all the reports I have filed at WP:UAA were not wrong all the way down? And about your question, I have already said I will handle mainly Indic wiki requests. And as per my knowledge there are no such policies which allow corporate usernames. And where I am unsure or unaware of policies I can always step back and allow others to take up that task. I will only handle those requests which I am sure of. thanks QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 09:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- thank you for the answer. Happy to support. Cabayi (talk) 09:27, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support --MeganB... …till the end 11:01, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support trusted user -- DARIO SEVERI (talk) 12:29, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support Sure! --Superpes15 (talk) 23:16, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support trusted user Thingofme (talk) 08:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support trusted. ≈ MS Sakib «TalK» 15:15, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support – Ammarpad (talk) 15:19, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support -FASTILY 07:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Alaa :)..! 08:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support ~~ Noman☆(talk) 09:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Strong support Highly Trusted User. Aviram NoSurprisesPlease 13:39, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Strong support Trusted User. -J. Ansari Talk 17:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Strong support Trusted user. Thingofme (talk) 14:15, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 17:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support LGTM. Meets my criteria of showing some semblance of regular, active cross-wiki activity together with evidence they're both technically competent and trusted. Dmehus (talk) 21:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support Ruy (talk) 22:42, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 07:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Geonuch (talk) 15:07, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Done. Clear consensus for promoting. @Trijnstel, -revi, and Masti: for the mailing list. —Thanks for the fish! talk•contrib (he/him) 14:59, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Requests for global IP block exemption
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global IP block exempt for dxmaimxd
- Global user: dxmaimxd (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I am a Chinese user. Because the government has blocked the Wikiproject, I have to use the proxy server to participate in the Wikiproject. I get blocked when editing Wikidata and other Wikiprojects. --dxmaimxd (talk) 11:05, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello @Dxmaimxd, thanks for your request. It looks the GIPBE request is one of your first edits. I recommend you to first request a local exemption at a wikiproject you'd like to edit, and requesting the global exemption later. zh:Wikipedia:IPBEMAIL has instructions for requesting an exemption on the Chinese Wikipedia. Best, Martin Urbanec (talk) 05:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Not done No reply, probably not needed anymore. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 07:56, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for binguimath
- Global user: binguimath (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Hi, I'm an English Wikipedia user living in China. Since I need a VPN to access the wikipedia, my account is blocked from editing the webpages. Can I request for a global IP block exempt? --binguimath (talk) 03:21, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- If you edit English Wikipedia, you need a local exemption there. Ruslik (talk) 13:50, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- When I was editing the English Wikipedia, the webpage shows that "This IP address range has been globally blocked...This block may be appealed at Global steward requests on Meta-Wiki." Namely, my IP was blocked from ALL wikiprojects, but not just English Wikipedia. And the instruction page suggested that I may apply for a global IP block exempt. Could you help me with this? Binguimath (talk) 18:49, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello @Binguimath, English Wikipedia blocks most VPNs locally as well. While the global IP exemption would exempt you from the global part, the local block will still stay. That's why @Ruslik0 said it won't work. A local exemption will be needed for VPN editing at en.wikipedia. Please see en:WP:IPECPROXY for details. Best, Martin Urbanec (talk) 04:57, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Not done No follow-up. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 07:56, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hello @Binguimath, English Wikipedia blocks most VPNs locally as well. While the global IP exemption would exempt you from the global part, the local block will still stay. That's why @Ruslik0 said it won't work. A local exemption will be needed for VPN editing at en.wikipedia. Please see en:WP:IPECPROXY for details. Best, Martin Urbanec (talk) 04:57, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- When I was editing the English Wikipedia, the webpage shows that "This IP address range has been globally blocked...This block may be appealed at Global steward requests on Meta-Wiki." Namely, my IP was blocked from ALL wikiprojects, but not just English Wikipedia. And the instruction page suggested that I may apply for a global IP block exempt. Could you help me with this? Binguimath (talk) 18:49, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for Achiri Bitamsimli
- Global user: Achiri Bitamsimli (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Hello! I am a member of Dagbani Wikimedians User Group in Ghana. I edits English wikipedia, Dagbani wikipedia, wikimedia Commons, Wikidata, wikivoyage, wikitionary and others. My IP address was blocked globally since last three months and anytime they give a date to unblock me they will end up extending the date. I am currently a facilitator of our user group, but since then I could not help anybody. I am appealing to you to kindly unblock me to enable me continue my work and contribute more on the wiki projects. Achiri Bitamsimli (talk) 13:04, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello @Achiri Bitamsimli, you already have the global exemption. If you still see an error message saying you were blocked, do you mind sharing the error message here, so we can review? In case you wish to keep it private, you can email stewards@wikimedia.org instead (and note the ticket number [which will come in an autoreply message] here, so we can connect both places together). Thanks, Martin Urbanec (talk) 04:56, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Not done No follow-up. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 07:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for CyberTroopers
- Global user: CyberTroopers (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
My IP address was blocked when I try to edit on the English Wikipedia, probably because it was misused by another user so that I was affected by it. I cannot inform the administrator there because I am barred from editing any page including discussion page. This happens when I use Wi-Fi, instead of a data connection. Hopefully it can be resolved quickly. Thanks, --CyberTroopers (talk) 14:16, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello @CyberTroopers, considering the issue is at English Wikipedia, it is likely the global IP exemption won't work. Do you mind sharing the IP address here (it'll be public)? Alternatively, you can email stewards@wikimedia.org, send the IP address there and note the ticket number here (so we can have a look; ticket number will come in an autoreply). Thanks, Martin Urbanec (talk) 04:53, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Martin Urbanec: This is my IP address: 124.217.247.167. It's on the blocklist. CyberTroopers (talk) 02:06, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- @CyberTroopers as that IP is not blocked here, or globally, this should be able to be resolved locally. You can request enwiki IPBE via their w:en:Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System. — xaosflux Talk 14:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Not done There is no global block on the IP in question, so global exemption won't be sufficient (despite its name, it doesn't make holders immune from all blocks, only global blocks, issued by a steward). Martin Urbanec (talk) 07:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- @CyberTroopers as that IP is not blocked here, or globally, this should be able to be resolved locally. You can request enwiki IPBE via their w:en:Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System. — xaosflux Talk 14:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Martin Urbanec: This is my IP address: 124.217.247.167. It's on the blocklist. CyberTroopers (talk) 02:06, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for 日期20220626
- Global user: 日期20220626 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
My IP is blocked by MetaWiki, I live in China, hope to give me IP exemption, thank you. --日期20220626 (talk) 11:51, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello @日期20220626, which project(s) do you wish to edit please? If the Chinese Wikipedia, I recommend to follow zh:WP:IPBEMAIL. Sincerely, Martin Urbanec (talk) 08:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Not done Closing per conversation at User talk:日期20220626 --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:07, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for Dušan Kreheľ (bot)
- Global user: Dušan Kreheľ (bot) (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I have the VPS server on IP address 2a03:b0c0:3:d0::16f9:2001, and i wanna the change page. I got this message when changing.
Thanks, --Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 07:03, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Dušan Kreheľ You can't be serious... I asked you a certain question in your previous (G)IPBE request below three times, without getting a reply. Instead, you withdrew the request, only to refill it within a couple of minutes. Let me ask it for the last time (future requests w/o an answer will be declined): "Which project(s) is this an issue at?"
- @Dušan Kreheľ To nemůžeš myslet vážně... V tvé předchozí žádosti o výjimku jsem položil jasnou otázku, na kterou jsem zatím neobdržel odpověď. Namísto toho jsi žádost vzal zpět, abys ji mohl podat znovu. Položím svou otázku nyní naposledy (další žádosti bez odpovědi budou rovnou zamítnuté): Na jakém projektu se s tímto problémem potýkáš? Martin Urbanec (talk) 07:51, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Martin Urbanec: My message output is from zhwiki top.
- Ten výpis je zo zhwiki. Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 07:58, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Dušan Kreheľ Not done V takovém případě musím žádost zamítnout. Tebou zmíněná IP adresa je na zhwiki zablokovaná také lokálně, a proto globální výjimka nepomůže. Doporučuji buď požádat o místní výjimku na čínské Wikipedii, anebo o přístup k Toolforge, pokud jej nemáš (editace z Toolforge jsou povolené na všech projektech Wikimedia). Děkuji za pochopení, Martin Urbanec (talk) 08:12, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for Kcx36
- Global user: Kcx36 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Hi, I'm from Chinese mainland. I cannot edit Commons, Wikidata and Wikisource sometimes (depends on different proxy servers I use), so I hope to get Global IP block exemption.
"Your current IP address is 2403:18c0:3:369:: and the blocked range is 2403:18C0:2:0:0:0:0:0/47."
--Kcx36 (talk) 08:29, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Done --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:35, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
2FA Tester for MdaNoman
- Global user: MdaNoman (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Hello! I have read Help:Two-factor authentication and now interested to protect my account . Thanks, --Noman☆(talk) 11:49, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Requests for other global permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
ipblock-exempt for Dušan Kreheľ (bot)
- Global user: Dušan Kreheľ (bot) (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I wanna the IP block exempt for my bot Dušan Kreheľ (bot) to use even commercial VPS, thanks, --Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 18:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hello @Dušan Kreheľ, can you please clarify which kind of an IP block exemption you need, the IP address of the VPS, and the project(s) your bot will be (or is) editing? Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:40, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Martin Urbanec: Tak IP6: 2A03:B0C0:3:D0:0:0:0:0/64. No predstavoval som si to tak, že aby to fungovalo univerzálne. Dostane to členstvo, a ten používateľ sa môže pristupovať z hocikadiaľ. A aby to pravidlo neobmedzovalo používateľa na žiadnu lokálnu Wikipédiu. Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 17:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ahoj @Dušan Kreheľ, taková skupina bohužel neexistuje . Existují pouze místní/lokální výjimky z bloků, které fungují pouze na jednom konkrétním projektu, ale zato jsou účinné proti všem druhům bloků (ať už lokálním, nebo globálním). Pak existuje (trochu nešťastně pojmenovaná) globální výjimka, která sice funguje na všech projektech, ale zato funguje jen proti globálním blokům (tj. blokům, které nastavil některý steward). Abych Ti mohl pomoci, potřebuji vědět, na jakých projektech bot má v plánu editovat. Děkuji, Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:55, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Martin Urbanec: Ok. Tak ja chcem tu výnimku voči globálnym blockom. Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 22:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Dušan Kreheľ Výjimky jsou udělované v situacích, kdy jsou potřeba k vyřešení problému, ne ve chvílích, kdy někdo prohlásí, že "výjimku chce". Znovu opakuji otázku: Na jakých projektech s botem v tuto chvíli narážíš na problém? Martin Urbanec (talk) 23:41, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Martin Urbanec: Ok. Tak ja chcem tu výnimku voči globálnym blockom. Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 22:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ahoj @Dušan Kreheľ, taková skupina bohužel neexistuje . Existují pouze místní/lokální výjimky z bloků, které fungují pouze na jednom konkrétním projektu, ale zato jsou účinné proti všem druhům bloků (ať už lokálním, nebo globálním). Pak existuje (trochu nešťastně pojmenovaná) globální výjimka, která sice funguje na všech projektech, ale zato funguje jen proti globálním blokům (tj. blokům, které nastavil některý steward). Abych Ti mohl pomoci, potřebuji vědět, na jakých projektech bot má v plánu editovat. Děkuji, Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:55, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Martin Urbanec: Tak IP6: 2A03:B0C0:3:D0:0:0:0:0/64. No predstavoval som si to tak, že aby to fungovalo univerzálne. Dostane to členstvo, a ten používateľ sa môže pristupovať z hocikadiaľ. A aby to pravidlo neobmedzovalo používateľa na žiadnu lokálnu Wikipédiu. Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 17:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
I stoping this request. You can close. Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 06:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Request withdrawn --Martin Urbanec (talk) 07:24, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
See also
- User groups — Information on user groups
- Global rights log — Log of global permissions changes
- Archives
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation