Wikimedia Foundation/Communications/Wikimedia brands/2030 movement brand project/Community feedback and straw poll

Community feedback and straw poll

• English: In light of recent events, including the publication of survey text and naming proposals, I feel it may benefit the WMF to see how the community feels about certain naming-related issues, transparently and on-wiki. Therefore, I have created the below poll. This is an informal poll, and does not replace the WMF survey, which you may wish to complete. Best, --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
• Deutsch: Im Lichte der aktuellen Entwicklungen, vor allem der Veröffentlichung des Textes der Umfrage und der Namensvorschläge, denke ich, dass es der WMF helfen wird, zu sehen, was die Community in Bezug auf bestimmte mit der Umbenennung zusammenhängende Dinge fühlt, transparent und on-wiki. Daher habe ich die untenstehende Umfrage erstellt. Das ist eine informelle Umfrage, sie ersetzt nicht den WMF survey, den Du vielleicht trotzdem ausfüllen möchtest.
• Italiano: Alla luce dei recenti eventi, inclusa la pubblicazione del testo del sondaggio e delle proposte di nome, io credo che WMF potrebbe avere vantaggi vedendo cosa la community pensa riguardo ad alcuni problemi relativi alla denominazione, trasparentemente e su wiki. Perciò, ho creato il sondaggio sottostante. Questo è un sondaggio informale, e non rimpiazza il sondaggio WMF, che potreste voler completare.

Question 1

English: Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: Any survey about naming proposals should include the status quo as an option, with the same prominence as proposed new names.
Deutsch: Bitte gib an, ob Du folgender Aussage zustimmst: Jede Untersuchung über Namensvorschläge sollte den Status quo als eine Option anbieten, mit der gleichen Darstellung wie neue Namen.
Русский: Сообщите, пожалуйста, согласны ли вы или нет со следующим утверждением: любой опрос о предложениях по именованию должен включать в себя "статус-кво" в качестве опции с тем же значением, что и предлагаемые новые названия.

فارسی: لطفاً اعلام کنید که با جملهٔ مقابل موافقید یا مخالف: هرگونه نظرسنجی دربارهٔ نام‌های پیشنهادی باید حاوی گزینه‌ای باشد مبنی بر حفظ «وضعیت موجود»، با همان میزان برجستگی گزینه‌های نام‌های پیشنهادی جدید.

français : Merci d'indiquer si vous être d'accord ou en désaccord avec la déclaration suivante : Un questionnaire avec des propositions de changement de noms devrait inclure une option avec le statu quo, option qui aurait la même importance que les autres options.
Italiano: Per favore, indica se concordi o meno con la seguente affermazione: Qualsiasi sondaggio sulle proposte di denominazione dovrebbe includere lo status quo come opzione avente il medesimo risalto dei nuovi nomi proposti.
Español: Indique si está de acuerdo o en desacuerdo con la siguiente declaración: cualquier encuesta sobre las propuestas de nombres debe incluir el status quo como una opción, con el mismo protagonismo que los nuevos nombres propuestos.

Agree

1. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
2. Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 21:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
3. --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 21:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
4. --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
5. --Magiers (talk) 08:14, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
6. --NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 08:47, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
7. --Niki.L (talk) 08:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
8. --Count Count (talk) 10:44, 17 June 2020 (UTC) As a matter of course.
9. → «« Man77 »» ^[de] 12:10, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
10. Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 15:04, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
11. Sure — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:55, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
12. --Kaganer (talk) 16:05, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
13. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
14. Iridescent (talk) 16:48, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
15. The three proposals should also have a direct acceptable/unacceptable survey choice. TomDotGov (talk) 17:03, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
16. --Schazjmd (talk) 17:19, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
17. --Stefan64 (talk) 18:22, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
18. --Alraunenstern۞ 18:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
19. --voyager (talk) 18:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
20. --Troubled @sset 18:40, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
21. --DraconicDark (talk) 18:42, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
22. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:18, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
23. --StYxXx (talk) 19:20, 17 June 2020 (UTC) Unless you're a dictatorial government and your poll is just a farce. Then you might want to omit it in some cases. Even better: Just offer a single option and 100% support is quaranteed!
24. --Elmidae (talk) 19:23, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
25. --He3nry (talk) 19:24, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
26. --Novak Watchmen (talk) 19:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
27. --Wuselig (talk) 19:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
28. --Redrobsche (talk) 19:40, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
29. --Ameisenigel (talk) 19:46, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
30. --Itti (talk) 20:28, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
31. --Geher (talk) 20:53, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
32. XenonX3 (talk) 20:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
33. --MSchnitzler2000 (talk) 21:04, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
34. --Nicola (talk) 21:09, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
35. -jkb- 21:10, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
36. Oesterreicher12 (talk) 21:12, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
37. --EddieHugh (talk) 21:16, 17 June 2020 (UTC) All of the official poll 'options' are Wikipedia! Yet more contempt shown by the WMF to the people who built Wikipedia and related projects.
38. --Neozoon (talk) 21:50, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
39. --Mikmaq (talk) 22:15, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
40. --.sEdivad (msg) 22:30, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
41. -<(kmk)>- (talk) 22:34, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
42. --Belladonna* (talk) 23:14, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
43. Nosebagbear (talk) 23:18, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
44. — Coffee // have a cup // 23:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
45. --Elop (talk) 23:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
46. --Einsamer Schütze (talk) 23:43, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
47. --Sophie Elisabeth (talk) 23:50, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
48. --𝒬𝔔 00:09, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
49. Vermont (talk) 01:32, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
50. Sgd. —Hasley 02:18, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
51. Unless a change is preordained, obviously you would include the status quo. Gamaliel (talk) 02:25, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
52. --Fano (talk) 02:51, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
53. ━ ALBERTOLEONCIO Who, me? 03:30, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
54. --Holder (talk) 04:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
55. How could you not include one of the expected front-runner answers in a poll to gauge sentiment? Bawolff (talk) 06:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
56. --Leserättin (talk) 06:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
57. --Don-kun (talk) 07:26, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
58. Sargoth (talk) 08:16, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
59. --Aka (talk) 08:38, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
60. Barnos (talk) 08:48, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
61. --Matthiasb (talk) 08:51, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
62. --smial (talk) 09:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
63. --Kmhkmh (talk) 09:21, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
64. --Snookerado (talk) 09:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
65. --Gestumblindi (talk) 10:03, 18 June 2020 (UTC) In my opinion, that should be self-evident.
66. Acather96 (talk) 10:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
67. Noé (talk) 10:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
68. --Rlbberlin (talk) 10:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
69. --Zinnmann (talk) 10:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
70. --Rmcharb (talk) 10:40, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
71. Romaine (talk) 10:42, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
72. --RJFF (talk) 11:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
73. --Theklan (talk) 11:51, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
74. --Millbart (talk) 12:22, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
75. Nasiruddin (talk) 12:46, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
76. Thryduulf (talk: meta · en.wp · wikidata) 12:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
77. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:51, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
78. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 15:59, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
79. Conny (talk) 16:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC).
80. --Björn Hagemann (talk) 18:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
81. Grueslayer (talk) 19:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
82. --Epìdosis 19:57, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
83. --Tozina (talk) 21:49, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
84. --RobNbaby (talk) 23:47, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
85. Wutsje (talk) 00:32, 19 June 2020 (UTC) - The status quo should always be an option.
86. 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
87. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:57, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
88. -- O.Koslowski (talk) 08:45, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
89. --Commander-pirx (talk) 11:20, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
90. Strobilomyces (talk) 11:22, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
91. --Afnecors (talk) 13:30, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
92. Laurentius (talk) 13:44, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
93. --Ferdi2005_[Mail] 14:04, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
94. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 15:04, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
95. –XanonymusX (talk) 15:45, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
96. Mautpreller (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
97. Mahlzahn (talk) 18:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
98. -- Ra'ike (talk) 19:05, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
99. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:11, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
100. Nemo 19:25, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
101. --Sakretsu (炸裂) 20:12, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
102. --2003:6:180:6645:92:20B4:EC40:E76 20:28, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
103. --.mau. ✉ 20:40, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
104. Ahmad^talk 21:11, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
105. Amqui (talk) 22:30, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
106. --JasN (talk) 22:50, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
107. --Rax (talk) 00:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC) - there recently had been a RFC here on Meta about wether the Foundation should call itself Wikipedia - the question had been: "Is it acceptable for the Foundation to use the name Wikipedia to refer to itself?" and the result was: No, that's not acceptable (support: 41 / oppose: 450).
108. Amir (talk) 00:33, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
109. --Nightdevil (talk) 07:19, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
110. --Rainyx (talk) 10:22, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
111. Bernhard Wallisch 12:11, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
112. Erdrokan (talk) 12:44, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
113. Rhadamante (talk) 15:11, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
114. Chaddy (talk) 15:17, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
115. --Kein Einstein (talk) 15:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
116. --Œ̷͠²ð·¨´´̢́̕͘³͏¯̞̗ (talk) 15:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
117. --Atamari (talk) 15:55, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
118. --Nitraus (talk) 16:15, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
119. Habitator terrae (talk) 16:24, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
120. NaBUru38 (talk) 16:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
121. Perrak (talk) 16:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
122. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (talk) 17:35, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
123. Lepricavark (talk) 19:50, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
124. Naypta (talk) 20:33, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
125. Bernd Bergmann (talk) 20:47, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
126. AnnaS.aus I. (talk) 21:43, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
127. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 01:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
128. Scheppi80 (talk) 07:34, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
129. --Fcarbonara (talk) 12:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
130. --Mess (talk) 12:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
131. --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 13:26, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
132. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
133. --Phyrexian ɸ 15:53, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
134. Ain92 (talk) 16:27, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
135. --3Pappa3 (talk) 18:16, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
136.  Support --Morten Haan (talk) 18:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
137. --C. crispus ^(talk) 19:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
138. --Superpes15 (talk) 20:04, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
139. --Ninovolador (talk) 20:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
140. carlinmack (talk) 20:20, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
141. Красный^{wanna talk?} 21:05, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
142. --Altkatholik62 (talk) 22:42, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
143. --MGChecker (talk) 23:16, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
144. ToBeFree (talk) 23:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
145. Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 05:43, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
146. --[[kgh]] (talk) 06:17, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
147. --Gugerell (talk) 06:44, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
148. Majavah (talk) 08:15, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
149. --Virginia Gentilini (talk) 08:17, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
150. --Pafsanias (talk) 08:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
151. --Bramfab (talk) 12:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
152. Alsee (talk) 15:16, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
153. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:45, 24 June 2020 (UTC) (Alles andere würde darauf hinauslaufen, zwangsweise eine Änderung heraufzubeschwören)
154. --LittlePuppers (talk) 16:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
155. --Carsaig (talk) 18:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
156. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 18:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
157. Status quo should not be a write-in option in this case.--Alexmar983 (talk) 19:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
158. Tito Dutta (talk) 19:11, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
159. Kaartic ^{correct me, if i'm wrong} 19:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
160. Susanna Giaccai (talk) 19:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
161. Em-mustapha ^{User | talk} 19:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
162. --Pauls erster Enkel (talk) 19:57, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
163. – Ammarpad (talk) 20:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
164. – Zoozaz1 (talk) 03:12, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
165. --NGC 54 (talk | contribs) 08:28, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
166. -- Eluinie (talk) 11:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
167. --Nicolabel (talk) 16:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
168. --Carlo Frisi (talk) 16:20, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
169. ---Jalu (talk) 16:41, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
170. --Yair rand (talk) 17:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
171. Mahir256 (talk) 17:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
172. Luisalvaz (talk) 18:48, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
173. Mervat --talk 21:08, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
174. Libcub (talk) 01:59, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
175. --Civvì (talk) 05:27, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
176. --L736E^{tell me} 10:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
177. --Beat Estermann (talk) 11:54, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
178. AB Louis (talk) 13:05, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
179. --Zblace (talk) 19:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
180. --Ysogo (talk) 21:37, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
181. Levivich (talk) 05:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
182. --ValterVB (talk) 08:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
183. --Amarvudol (talk) 12:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
184. 01miki10 (talk) 13:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
185. Lentokonefani (talk) 14:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
186. ----Kiwas (talk) 08:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
187. --An-d (talk) 14:18, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
188. * Pppery * _{it has begun} 02:58, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
189. DCDuring (talk) 10:32, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
190. Mwarf (talk) 19:25, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
191. MarcelBuehner (talk) 21:10, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
192. Llywrch (talk) 04:04, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
193. --Diorit (talk) 05:59, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
194. 5225_C (talk • contributions) 22:47, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
195. Ionmars10 (talk) 23:59, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
196. --OlEnglish ^(Talk) 02:51, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
197. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
198. AllyD (talk) 18:35, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
199. Headbomb (talk) 18:59, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
200. -- Gustavf (talk) 19:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
201. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 14:47, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
202. --KaiKemmann (talk) 20:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
203. Natuur12 (talk) 20:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
204. Danre98^{(talk|contribs)} 00:56, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
205. --Dcheney (talk) 04:18, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
206. --SamWinchester000 (talk) 08:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
207. Modest Genius (talk) 11:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
208. Pelagic (talk) 14:37, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
209. Editor-1 (talk) 12:20, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
210.  Support —Eihel (talk) 15:04, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
211. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 23:23, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
212. --Hardenacke (talk) 11:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
213. --Nenntmichruhigip (talk) 17:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
214. Heleniyoo (talk) 22:02, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
215. --Felis domestica (talk) 19:19, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
216. --Summer ... hier! (talk)
217. --Ghormon (talk) 17:00, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
218. --h-stt !? 14:15, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
219. --Jordi (talk) 07:26, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
220. Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 21:21, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
221. --Geolina163 (talk) 11:25, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
222. DaGizza (talk) 13:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
223. --Dirk123456 (talk) 08:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
224. --DerMaxdorfer (talk) 19:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
225. --Dandelo (talk) 11:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
226. --Carwil (talk) 18:25, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
227. MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 20:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
228. Willi The Kid (talk) 15:38, 2 November 2020 (UTC) It is really bad that this question has to be set for discussion.
229. WMF is best. No need to change. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:45, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Disagree

1. --Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 19:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Other

1. Ad Huikeshoven (talk) 15:13, 17 June 2020 (UTC) The survey asks your opiniong on 3 naming proposals, and has room to enter your own naming proposal as fourth proposal, which you could use to include the current naming convention. So, the survey provides already what you are asking, demanding, needing, wishing, wanting.

   I don't believe this is true, at least when it come to the "same prominence" part. We're not making people write in the 3 naming proposals, so why make them write in the alternative? TomDotGov (talk) 16:55, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

   It's akin to requiring voters for an election candidate write in the name/info and showing other candidates prominently as easy options. It's not remotely fair, except when it appears the vast majority opinion is for the status quo. Vermont (talk) 01:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

2. While "status quo" would be good, also having "none of the above" would be even better. Anomie (talk) 12:48, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Question 2

English: Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: The Wikimedia Foundation should change its name to one of the 3 Foundation-proposed names. (The three Foundation-proposed names are "Wikipedia Network Trust", "Wikipedia Organization", and "Wikipedia Foundation".) If your answer is "Agree", please specify which name(s) you would like the Foundation to be renamed to.
Deutsch: Bitte gib an, ob Du folgender Aussage zustimmst: Die Wikimedia Stiftung sollte ihren Namen in einen der drei von der Stiftung vorgeschlagenen Namen ändern. (Die drei vorgeschlagenen Namen sind "Stiftung des Wikipedia-Netzwerks", "Wikipedia-Organisation" und "Wikipedia-Stiftung".)
한국어: 다음 설명에 동의 여부를 표시하여주세요: 위키미디어 재단은 재단이 제안한 3개의 이름 중 하나로 이름을 변경해야 한다. (재단이 제안한 세개의 이름 - "Wikipedia Network Trust", "Wikipedia Organization", "Wikipedia Foundation") 답변이 "동의"인 경우 변경되어야 할 이름도 작성하여주세요.
Русский: Сообщите, пожалуйста, согласны ли вы или нет со следующим утверждением: Фонд Викимедиа должен изменить свое название на один из трёх предложенных Фондом вариантов. (Три предложенных Фондом варианта названия - "Wikipedia Network Trust" ("сетевой Траст Википедии"), "Wikipedia Organization" ("организация Википедии") и "Wikipedia Foundation" ("Фонд Википедии"). Если ваш ответ "согласен", то укажите, пожалуйста, в какой (какие) именно из вариантов вы хотели бы переименовать Фонд.

فارسی: لطفاً اعلام کنید که با جملهٔ مقابل موافقید یا مخالف: بنیاد ویکی‌مدیا باید نامش را به یکی از سه نام پیشنهادی از طرف بنیاد تغییر دهد. (سه نام پیشنهادی توسط بنیاد عبارتند از «شبکهٔ امانی ویکی‌پدیا»، «سازمان ویکی‌پدیا»، و «بنیاد ویکی‌پدیا»). اگر موافق هستید، لطفاً مشخص کنید که ترجیحتان با کدام نام(ها) است؟

français : Merci d'indiquer si vous êtes d'accord ou en désaccord avec la déclaration suivante : La Wikimedia Foundation devrait changer son nom pour l'un des trois noms proposés : "Wikipedia Network Trust", "Wikipedia Organization", "Wikipedia Foundation". Si vous êtes d'accord, merci de préciser quel choix à votre préférence.
Italiano: Per favore, indica se concordi o meno con la seguente affermazione: Wikimedia Foundation dovrebbe cambiare nome in uno dei tre nomi proposti dalla fondazione (i tre nomi sono "Wikipedia Network Trust", "Wikipedia Organization" e "Wikipedia Foundation"). Se la tua risposta è "Concordo", per favore specifica quali fra i suddetti nomi sono di tua preferenza.
Español: Indique si está de acuerdo o en desacuerdo con la siguiente declaración: La Fundación Wikimedia debería cambiar su nombre a uno de los 3 nombres propuestos por la Fundación. (Los tres nombres propuestos por la Fundación son "Wikipedia Network Trust", "Wikipedia Organization", "Wikipedia Foundation"). Si su respuesta es "De acuerdo", especifique a qué nombre(s) le gustaría cambiar el nombre de la Fundación.

Agree

1. Skalman (talk) 21:13, 21 June 2020 (UTC) Having "Wikipedia" in the name would simplify many parts of the branding. I prefer "Wikipedia Foundation", though I like all of the suggestions better than the status quo.
2. All three proposals are fine and remove the confusing "Wikimedia" from the name of a group of projects that is known primarily for Wikipedia, and receives donations primarily intended to keep Wikipedia running. My personal favorite is "Wikipedia Organization" because it is a non-profit organization mainly about Wikipedia, and can be nicely abbreviated to "Wikipedia.org". ToBeFree (talk) 23:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
3. Em-mustapha ^{User | talk} 19:57, 22 June 2020 (UTC) Agree with Wikipedia Foundation.
4. --Johannnes89 (talk) 11:14, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
5. --Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 19:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Disagree

1. Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 21:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
2. --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 21:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
3. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:36, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
4. --Magiers (talk) 08:14, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
5. --NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 08:47, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
6. --Niki.L (talk) 08:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Rebranding would not make me feel part of Wikimedia but would alienate me from Wikipedia
7. → «« Man77 »» ^[de] 12:11, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
8. Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 15:06, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
9. --Kaganer (talk) 16:06, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
10. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
11. Iridescent (talk) 16:49, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
12. TomDotGov (talk) 17:03, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
13. -- Schazjmd (talk) 17:19, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
14. --Nicola (talk) 18:21, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
15. --Alraunenstern۞ 18:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
16. --voyager (talk) 18:37, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
17. --DraconicDark (talk) 18:42, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
18. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:19, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
19. --StYxXx (talk) 19:23, 17 June 2020 (UTC) But since the past polls and discussions about this subject were ignored or ridiculed ("0.6%") I don't expect the WMF to honor the community's opinion this time.
20. --Elmidae (talk) 19:24, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
21. --He3nry (talk) 19:24, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
22. --Novak Watchmen (talk) 19:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
23. --Ameisenigel (talk) 19:47, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
24. --Itti (talk) 20:29, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
25. --Geher (talk) 20:54, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
26. XenonX3 (talk) 20:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
27. --MSchnitzler2000 (talk) 21:04, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
28. -jkb- 21:11, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
29. Oesterreicher12 (talk) 21:12, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
30. --EddieHugh (talk) 21:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
31. --Neozoon (talk) 21:51, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
32. --Mikmaq (talk) 22:23, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
33. --.sEdivad (msg) 22:30, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
34. --Thegooduser (talk) 22:51, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
35. --Belladonna* (talk) 23:15, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
36. Nosebagbear (talk) 23:18, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
37. — Coffee // have a cup // 23:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
38. --Elop (talk) 23:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
39. --Einsamer Schütze (talk) 23:43, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
40. --Sophie Elisabeth (talk) 23:52, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
41. --𝒬𝔔 00:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
42. Vermont (talk) 01:35, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
43. Sgd. —Hasley 02:22, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
44. Gamaliel (talk) 02:26, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
45. --Fano (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
46. --Leserättin (talk) 06:40, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
47. --Count Count (talk) 07:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
48. --Don-kun (talk) 07:27, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
49. --Wuselig (talk) 08:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
50. --Sargoth (talk) 08:16, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
51. --Aka (talk) 08:38, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
52. As a Wikipedian I don't want the WMF using Wikipedia in its name.
    As a wikinewsian and commons user I am strongly against the preferation of Wikipedia by the foundation.
    --Matthiasb (talk) 08:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
53. per others. --smial (talk) 09:10, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
54. --Kmhkmh (talk) 09:22, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
55. --Snookerado (talk) 09:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
56. Acather96 (talk) 10:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
57. Noé (talk) 10:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
58. --Rlbberlin (talk) 10:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
59. --Zinnmann (talk) 10:40, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
60. --Rmcharb (talk) 10:41, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
61. Romaine (talk) 10:43, 18 June 2020 (UTC) - Additionally: In the past decade I asked many people in the movement if WMF is part of the Wikimedia community. Many users from the projects said no to this question, many others are not sure about this. Over the past 15 years WMF has alienated itself from the community that creates the content. That raises for me the question if WMF should not become independent from the rest of the Wikimedia movement with a name that reflects that.
62. --RJFF (talk) 11:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
63. --Theklan (talk) 11:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
64. --Millbart (talk) 12:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
65. Nasiruddin (talk) 12:47, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
66. These would introduce significant confusion where none currently exists and entrench the confusion and misconceptions that currently does exist - the worst of all worlds. Thryduulf (talk: meta · en.wp · wikidata) 12:53, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
67. --Redrobsche (talk) 13:43, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
68. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
69. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 16:00, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
70. --Björn Hagemann (talk) 18:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
71. Grueslayer (talk) 19:25, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
72. --Epìdosis 19:57, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
73. --RobNbaby (talk) 23:48, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
74. Wutsje (talk) 00:32, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
75. 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
76. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:58, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
77. -- O.Koslowski (talk) 08:45, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
78. --Commander-pirx (talk) 11:21, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
79. Strobilomyces (talk) 11:24, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
80. --Afnecors (talk) 13:27, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
81. --Ferdi2005_[Mail] 14:05, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
82. –XanonymusX (talk) 15:45, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
83. Mautpreller (talk) 18:54, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
84. Mahlzahn (talk) 18:57, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
85. -- Ra'ike (talk) 19:09, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
86. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:12, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
87. --Sakretsu (炸裂) 20:12, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
88. --.mau. ✉ 20:41, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
89. Ahmad^talk 21:20, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
90. --JasN (talk) 22:51, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
91. --Rax (talk) 00:31, 20 June 2020 (UTC) - there recently had been a RFC here on Meta about wether the Foundation should call itself Wikipedia - the question had been: "Is it acceptable for the Foundation to use the name Wikipedia to refer to itself?" and the result was: No, that's not acceptable (support: 41 / oppose: 450).
92. Amir (talk) 00:33, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
93. --Nightdevil (talk) 07:17, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
94. --Rainyx (talk) 10:21, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
95. Bernhard Wallisch 12:11, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
96. Erdrokan (talk) 12:44, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
97. Rhadamante (talk) 15:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
98. Chaddy (talk) 15:18, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
99. --Kein Einstein (talk) 15:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
100. --Œ̷͠²ð·¨´´̢́̕͘³͏¯̞̗ (talk) 15:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
101. --Atamari (talk) 15:55, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
102. --Nitraus (talk) 16:15, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
103. Habitator terrae (talk) 16:25, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
104. NaBUru38 (talk) 16:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
105. Perrak (talk) 16:40, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
106. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (talk) 17:35, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
107. Lepricavark (talk) 19:51, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
108. Naypta (talk) 20:33, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
109. AnnaS.aus I. (talk) 21:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC) In most of the cases a rebranding is not necessarily the best option and it is quite expensive. There should be a separation between WP-community and foundation (at least, that's what I feel is a strong wish in the German WP). But - above all: this poll does not have a morally (!) correct basis, as the question has been answered before. Why don't you respect the community's whish? For me, the community comes first - and then Wikimedia. (whoever sees this poll as legitimate should maybe read the Wikipedia history and it's principles again).
110. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 01:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
111. Scheppi80 (talk) 07:35, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
112. --Fcarbonara (talk) 12:39, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
113. I think Thryduulf (#66) explains it well, plus Requests for comment/Should the Foundation call itself Wikipedia already asked and answered this. Anomie (talk) 12:48, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
114. --Mess (talk) 12:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
115. --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 13:30, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
116. --Phyrexian ɸ 15:53, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
117. Ain92 (talk) 16:27, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
118.  Oppose --Morten Haan (talk) 18:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
119. --3Pappa3 (talk) 18:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
120. not without the informed consent of stakeholders who have first claim on the wikipedia name. Bawolff (talk) 18:24, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
121. --C. crispus ^(talk) 19:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
122. --Superpes15 (talk) 20:06, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
123. --Ninovolador (talk) 20:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
124. carlinmack (talk) 20:21, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
125. Красный^{wanna talk?} 21:05, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
126. --Elwood (talk) 22:25, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
127. --Altkatholik62 (talk) 22:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
128. --Cartinal (talk) 23:15, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
129. --MGChecker (talk) 23:17, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
130. --[[kgh]] (talk) 06:17, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
131. --Gugerell (talk) 06:45, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
132. --Virginia Gentilini (talk) 08:18, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
133. --Pafsanias (talk) 08:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
134. --Bramfab (talk) 12:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
135. Alsee (talk) 15:17, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
136. This is Requests for comment/Should the Foundation call itself Wikipedia packed in a new box. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
137. --LittlePuppers (talk) 16:15, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
138. --Carsaig (talk) 18:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
139. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 18:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
140. --Alexmar983 (talk) 19:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
141. Tito Dutta (talk) 19:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
142. Kaartic ^{correct me, if i'm wrong} 19:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
143. Susanna Giaccai (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
144. Pauls erster Enkel (talk) 20:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
145. – Ammarpad (talk) 20:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
146. --NGC 54 (talk | contribs) 08:28, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
147. -- Eluinie (talk) 11:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
148. --Carlo Frisi (talk) 16:21, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
149. --Jalu (talk) 17:31, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
150. --Yair rand (talk) 17:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
151. Mahir256 (talk) 17:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
152. Libcub (talk) 02:01, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
153. --Civvì (talk) 05:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
154. --Beat Estermann (talk) 11:37, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
155. In the past, in some lawsuits, Wikimedia was able to win because lawyers were able to explain (quite easily) that "Wikimedia is not Wikipedia". If the Board goes on with these choices, it would be very interesting to see how the lawyers can then convince a court and a judge that "Wikipedia is not Wikipedia". It appears something worth the show, good luck.--L736E^{tell me} 12:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
156. I would only change the way it is written into WikiMedia Foundation Zblace (talk) 19:35, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
157. --Ysogo (talk) 21:37, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
158. WMF cannot and should not appropriate the Wikipedia name. Levivich (talk) 05:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
159. --ValterVB (talk) 08:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
160. --Amarvudol (talk) 12:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
161. Lentokonefani (talk) 14:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
162. --Kiwas (talk) 08:50, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
163. 01miki10 (talk) 13:26, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
164. --JTCEPB (talk) 17:10, 26 June 2020 (UTC) Can the WMF order drug screenings for the people who came up with this idea?
165. DCDuring (talk) 10:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
166. MarcelBuehner (talk) 21:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
167. Llywrch (talk) 04:05, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
168. --Diorit (talk) 06:00, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
169. 5225_C (talk • contributions) 22:47, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
170. Ionmars10 (talk) 23:59, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
171. --OlEnglish ^(Talk) 02:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
172. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
173. AllyD (talk) 18:37, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
174. Wikipedia anything is not a suitable name. Headbomb (talk) 19:00, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
175. -- Gustavf (talk) 19:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
176. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 14:48, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
177. --KaiKemmann (talk) 20:40, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
178. Natuur12 (talk) 20:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
179. Danre98^{(talk|contribs)} 00:58, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
180. Modest Genius (talk) 12:00, 1 July 2020 (UTC) - any name for the Foundation that includes the word 'Wikipedia' is inappropriate
181. Pelagic (talk) 14:49, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
182. SamWinchester000 (talk) 19:20, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
183. Editor-1 (talk) 12:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
184.  Oppose —Eihel (talk) 15:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
185. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 23:22, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
186. --Hardenacke (talk) 11:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
187. clearly --Nenntmichruhigip (talk) 17:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
188. Heleniyoo (talk) 22:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
189. --Felis domestica (talk) 19:21, 6 July 2020 (UTC) Stop wasting time and money on inane renaming proposals. Do something useful. Overhaul some servers. Improve search function.
190. --Summer ... hier! (talk) 12:48, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
191. Iliya wiki (talk) 12:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC) بنیاد ویکی‌پدیا
192. --Ghormon (talk) 16:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
193. Ost316 (talk) 22:58, 9 July 2020 (UTC): All three names are confusing at best and seem intent to piggy-back on Wikipedia's name. pedia is because the projects goal is to create an encyclopedia; the other projects do not have the same goal and this proposal would confuse a term that is clearly understood.
194. --Guy Macon (talk) 00:17, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
195. --h-stt !? 14:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC) Ursurping the name Wikipedia would mix the roles of the volunteers and those who have been established to support the volunteers but now live on the goodwill, created by the volunteers (see how I strain to avoid the term leechers?).
196. Strong disagree. Wikipedia is a community of editors while wmf is a bunch of staffs and volunteers. It is illogical even thinking about it.--Path slopu (talk) 11:16, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
197. Ursurping the name Wikipedia is intellectual theft. WMF has no moral right to do so.--Jordi (talk) 07:25, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
198. Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 21:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
199. —W. Edlmeier (talk) 12:39, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
200. Most WMF wikis are not encyclopedias. Having a 'pedia in their name will be unnecessarily confusing and pointless. DaGizza (talk) 13:24, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
201. --Dirk123456 (talk) 08:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
202. --DerMaxdorfer (talk) 19:17, 7 August 2020 (UTC) I totally agree with Niki.L (Disagree #6)
203. --Dandelo (talk) 11:15, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
204. MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 20:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
205. Willi The Kid (talk) 15:38, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
206. -- CptViraj (talk) 12:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
207. There are other wikis besides wikipedia. Wikipedia should be an encyclopedia, not a dictionary. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:45, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Other

1. DIEXEL (talk) 15:31, 18 June 2020 (UTC) Wiki Foundation.
2. Tozina (talk) 21:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC) "Wiki Foundation". Long time ago, it was in my mind before I knew "That organisation's name is Wikimedia Foundation." Treats all Wiki Projects equally.

   I like "Wiki Foundation" myself, with or without a space in the middle. Some people I know already call it that. While one possible confusion is the idea that it would support other wikis, that would a) would be a fine idea, possibly a rather impactful one given how little support most open-source wiki projects have or need to thrive, and b) one could say this already happens with new Projects like WD and perhaps Wikilambda. –SJ talk  01:17, 19 June 2020 (UTC) (Instead of deletion, as the post by Laurentius would otherwise be wrong, I just invalidated it. Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 05:55, 21 June 2020 (UTC))

   If I interpret correctly the question, these three answers should be under "Disagree" and not under "Other", since the statement is "The Wikimedia Foundation should change its name to one of the 3 Foundation-proposed names". "Other" should mean that you neither agree nor disagree with changing to those three names. - Laurentius (talk) 13:52, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

3. Wikifoundation, and so be it. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 15:04, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

   01miki10 (talk) 13:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Comments

• Wikifoundation (or Wiki Foundation, or even Wiki Network Trust) are all fine for me. --.mau. ✉ 20:43, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
• Note that "Wiki Foundation" is not really an option (I think), because the Wikimedia projects are not the only wiki websites that exist. I've seen the suggestion "WikiKnowledge Foundation" instead. PJvanMill (talk) 00:00, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Wikiknowledge Foundation caught my eye too (can't recall right now who mentioned it). Perhaps there should be some open (that means on-wiki not Facebook, etc.) brainstorming for community-submitted ideas. It could surface some more contenders like this. Suggest: whether it's Wikimedia, Wikipedia or Wikisomething Foundation, the abbreviation could be shortened to "WF". Pelagic (talk) 14:48, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Question 3

English: Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: The Wikimedia Movement should change its name to one of the 3 Foundation-proposed names. (The three Foundation-proposed names are "Wikipedia Network", "Wikipedia Movement", and "Wiki".) If your answer is "Agree", please specify which name(s) you would like the Movement to be renamed to.
Deutsch: Bitte gib an, ob Du folgender Aussage zustimmst: Die Wikimedia-Bewegung sollte ihren Namen in einen der drei von der Stiftung vorgeschlagenen Namen ändern. (Die drei vorgeschlagenen Namen sind "Wikipedia-Netzwerk", "Wikipedia-Bewegung", und "Wiki".)
"한국어:" 다음 설명에 동의 여부를 표시하여주세요: 위키미디어 운동은 재단이 제안한 3개의 이름 중 하나로 이름을 변경해야 한다. (재단이 제안한 세개의 이름 - "Wikipedia Network"("위키백과 네트워크"), "Wikipedia Movement"("위키백과 운동"), "Wiki"("위키").) 답변이 "동의"인 경우 변경되어야 할 이름도 작성하여주세요.
Русский: Сообщите, пожалуйста, согласны ли вы или нет со следующим утверждением: Движение Викимедиа должно изменить свое название на один из трёх предложенных Фондом вариантов. (Три предложенных Фондом названия - "Wikipedia Network" ("сеть Википедии"), "Wikipedia Movement" ("движение Википедии") и "Wiki" ("Вики"). Если ваш ответ "согласен", укажите, пожалуйста, в какое (какие) именно из вариантов вы хотели бы переименовать движение.

فارسی: لطفاً اعلام کنید که با جملهٔ مقابل موافقید یا مخالف: جنبش ویکی‌مدیا باید نامش را به یکی از سه نام پیشنهادی از طرف بنیاد تغییر دهد. (سه نام پیشنهادی توسط بنیاد عبارتند از «شبکهٔ ویکی‌پدیا»، «جنبش ویکی‌پدیا»، و «ویکی»). اگر موافق هستید، لطفاً مشخص کنید که ترجیحتان با کدام نام(ها) است؟

français : Merci d'indiquer si vous êtes d'accord ou en désaccord avec la déclaration suivante : Le mouvement Wikimedia devrait changer son nom pour l'un des trois noms proposés : "Wikipedia Network", "Wikipedia Movement", and "Wiki". Si vous êtes d'accord, merci de préciser quel choix à votre préférence.
Italiano: Per favore, indica se concordi o meno con la seguente affermazione: il Movimento Wikimedia (Wikimedia Movement) dovrebbe cambiare nome in uno dei tre nomi proposti dalla fondazione (i tre nomi sono "Wikipedia Network", "Wikipedia Movement" e "Wiki"). Se la tua risposta è "Concordo", per favore specifica quali fra i suddetti nomi sono di tua preferenza.
Espàñol: Indique si está de acuerdo o en desacuerdo con la siguiente declaración: El Movimiento Wikimedia (Wikimedia Movement) debería cambiar su nombre a uno de los 3 nombres propuestos por la Fundación. (Los tres nombres propuestos por la Fundación son "Wikipedia Network", "Wikipedia Movement" y "Wiki".) Si su respuesta es "De acuerdo", especifica a qué nombre(s) te gustaría cambiar el nombre del Movimiento.

Agree

1. Wiki is a googd solution. --Theklan (talk) 11:53, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
2. DIEXEL (talk) 15:31, 18 June 2020 (UTC) Wiki.
3. Wiki, because an empowered Wiki-Leader couldn't exist . Habitator terrae (talk) 16:33, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
4. Skalman (talk) 21:15, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
5. "Wikipedia Movement" sounds fine to me. "Wikipedia Network" sounds more like the interconnection between local chapters, not the whole movement. "Wiki" is a bad, confusing idea, as there are many "wiki"s that are unaffiliated with the Foundation/Organization/Trust. ToBeFree (talk) 23:50, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
6. In this context "Wikipedia Movement" might even make sense as in "the Movement that once started out as Wikipedia". --KaiKemmann (talk) 20:44, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
7. --Johannnes89 (talk) 11:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC) Wikipedia Movement
8. --Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 19:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Disagree

1. Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 21:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
2. --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 21:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
3. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:36, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
4. --Magiers (talk) 08:14, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
5. --NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 08:48, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
6. --Niki.L (talk) 08:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
7. → «« Man77 »» ^[de] 12:12, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
8. --Kaganer (talk) 16:07, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
9. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
10. Iridescent (talk) 16:49, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
11. -- Schazjmd (talk) 17:19, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
12. --Alraunenstern۞ 18:28, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
13. --voyager (talk) 18:37, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
14. --DraconicDark (talk) 18:42, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
15. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:20, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
16. --StYxXx (talk) 19:24, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
17. --Elmidae (talk) 19:25, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
18. --He3nry (talk) 19:25, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
19. --Novak Watchmen (talk) 19:28, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
20. --Ameisenigel (talk) 19:47, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
21. --Itti (talk) 20:30, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
22. XenonX3 (talk) 20:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
23. --MSchnitzler2000 (talk) 21:04, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
24. --Nicola (talk) 21:10, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
25. -jkb- 21:11, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
26. Oesterreicher12 (talk) 21:13, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
27. -- EddieHugh (talk) 21:19, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
28. --Neozoon (talk) 21:52, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
29. --Mikmaq (talk) 22:24, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
30. --.sEdivad (msg) 22:30, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
31. --Belladonna* (talk) 23:16, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
32. Nosebagbear (talk) 23:19, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
33. — Coffee // have a cup // 23:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
34. --Elop (talk) 23:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
35. --Einsamer Schütze (talk) 23:45, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
36. --Sophie Elisabeth (talk) 23:55, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
37. --𝒬𝔔 00:12, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
38. Sgd. —Hasley 02:21, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
39. Gamaliel (talk) 02:26, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
40. --Fano (talk) 03:09, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
41. --Leserättin (talk) 06:41, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
42. --Count Count (talk) 07:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
43. --Don-kun (talk) 07:28, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
44. --Wuselig (talk) 08:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
45. --Aka (talk) 08:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
46. I am sharing a hobby (Wikipedia) with others. I am strongly denying to be "part of a movement". There is no movement behind playing soccer, and there is no movement behind editing Wikipedia. --Matthiasb (talk) 09:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
47. per others --smial (talk) 09:10, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
48. --Kmhkmh (talk) 09:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
49. --Snookerado (talk) 09:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
50. Acather96 (talk) 10:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
51. Noé (talk) 10:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
52. --Rlbberlin (talk) 10:35, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
53. --Zinnmann (talk) 10:41, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
54. --Rmcharb (talk) 10:42, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
55. Romaine (talk) 10:43, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
56. --RJFF (talk) 11:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
57. --Millbart (talk) 12:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
58. Nasiruddin (talk) 12:47, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
59. The movement is vastly broader than "Wikipedia" but vastly smaller than "Wiki", both choices would be actively misleading. Thryduulf (talk: meta · en.wp · wikidata) 12:55, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
60. --Redrobsche (talk) 13:44, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
61. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:51, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
62. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 16:00, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
63. --Björn Hagemann (talk) 18:57, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
64. Grueslayer (talk) 19:25, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
65. --Epìdosis 19:58, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
66. --Tozina (talk) 21:59, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
67. --RobNbaby (talk) 23:49, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
68. Wutsje (talk) 00:32, 19 June 2020 (UTC) - There are many, many wikis out there that have nothing to do with WMF projects.
69. 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
70. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:59, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
71. -- O.Koslowski (talk) 08:46, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
72. --Commander-pirx (talk) 11:27, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
73. This page helps me understand what the movement means. I think it is just a description, not an organisation with an official existence, and I hope it will stay that way. Strobilomyces (talk) 11:46, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
74. --Afnecors (talk) 13:28, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
75. --Ferdi2005_[Mail] 14:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
76. –XanonymusX (talk) 15:45, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
77. Mautpreller (talk) 18:55, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
78. Mahlzahn (talk) 18:58, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
79. -- Ra'ike (talk) 19:11, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
80. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
81. --Sakretsu (炸裂) 20:14, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
82. --.mau. ✉ 20:44, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
83. Ahmad^talk 21:21, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
84. --JasN (talk) 22:52, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
85. --Rax (talk) 00:32, 20 June 2020 (UTC) - there recently had been a RFC here on Meta about wether the Foundation should call itself Wikipedia - the question had been: "Is it acceptable for the Foundation to use the name Wikipedia to refer to itself?" and the result was: No, that's not acceptable (support: 41 / oppose: 450).
86. Amir (talk) 00:33, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
87. --Nightdevil (talk) 07:19, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
88. --Rainyx (talk) 10:21, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
89. Bernhard Wallisch 12:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
90. Erdrokan (talk) 12:44, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
91. Rhadamante (talk) 15:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
92. Chaddy (talk) 15:19, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
93. --Kein Einstein (talk) 15:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
94. --Œ̷͠²ð·¨´´̢́̕͘³͏¯̞̗ (talk) 15:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
95. --Atamari (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
96. --Nitraus (talk) 16:16, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
97. NaBUru38 (talk) 16:31, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
98. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (talk) 17:36, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
99. Lepricavark (talk) 19:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
100. Naypta (talk) 20:33, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
101. Bernd Bergmann (talk) 20:50, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
102. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 01:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
103. Scheppi80 (talk) 07:35, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
104. --Fcarbonara (talk) 12:40, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
105. I think Thryduulf (#59) explains it well. Anomie (talk) 12:48, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
106. --Mess (talk) 12:59, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
107. --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 13:30, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
108. --Phyrexian ɸ 15:53, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
109.  Oppose --Morten Haan (talk) 18:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
110. --3Pappa3 (talk) 18:21, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
111. --Superpes15 (talk) 20:08, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
112. --Ninovolador (talk) 20:19, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
113. carlinmack (talk) 20:21, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
114. Красный^{wanna talk?} 21:06, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
115. --Altkatholik62 (talk) 22:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
116. --MGChecker (talk) 23:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
117. --[[kgh]] (talk) 06:18, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
118. --Gugerell (talk) 06:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
119. strongly oppose using the word "Network". "Wikipedia Movement" is meh. Majavah (talk) 08:17, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
120. --Virginia Gentilini (talk) 08:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
121. --Pafsanias (talk) 08:47, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
122. --Bramfab (talk) 12:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
123. Alsee (talk) 15:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
124. See my comment to question 2 Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
125. --Carsaig (talk) 18:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
126. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 18:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
127. Tito Dutta (talk) 19:15, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
128. Kaartic ^{correct me, if i'm wrong} 19:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
129. Susanna Giaccai (talk) 19:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
130. Pauls erster Enkel (talk) 20:00, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
131. – Ammarpad (talk) 20:22, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
132. --NGC 54 (talk | contribs) 08:28, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
133. -- Eluinie (talk) 11:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
134. --Carlo Frisi (talk) 16:22, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
135. --Jalu (talk) 17:32, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
136. --Yair rand (talk) 17:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
137. Mahir256 (talk) 17:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
138. Libcub (talk) 02:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
139. --Civvì (talk) 05:29, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
140. --Beat Estermann (talk) 11:38, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
141. --L736E^{tell me} 12:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
142. Zblace (talk) 19:36, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
143. --Ysogo (talk) 21:37, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
144. WMF cannot and should not appropriate the Wikipedia or Wiki names (nor should it call itself a "movement"). Levivich (talk) 05:38, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
145. --ValterVB (talk) 08:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
146. 01miki10 (talk) 13:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
147. Lentokonefani (talk) 14:24, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
148. --Kiwas (talk) 08:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
149. DCDuring (talk) 10:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
150. All three proposals are worse than the status quo Mwarf (talk) 20:32, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
151. MarcelBuehner (talk) 21:12, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
152. --Diorit (talk) 06:00, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
153. 5225_C (talk • contributions) 22:47, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
154. Ionmars10 (talk) 23:59, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
155. --OlEnglish ^(Talk) 02:55, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
156. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:42, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
157. Wikipedia anything is not acceptable. Headbomb (talk) 19:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
158. -- Gustavf (talk) 19:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
159. Natuur12 (talk) 20:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
160. Danre98^{(talk|contribs)} 00:59, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
161. Modest Genius (talk) 12:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC) - it's unclear how the 'Movement' differs from the Foundation, but co-opting the word 'Wikipedia' is inappropriate for anything that isn't the encyclopaedia.
162. Pelagic (talk) 15:23, 1 July 2020 (UTC) Arguably there are Wikipedia, Wikidata, Linked Data, Wikisource, WikiGLAM, etc. Movements that are distinct from but overlapping with the broader Wikimedia Movement. Different people will be passionate about some areas but not others.
163. SamWinchester000 (talk) 19:19, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
164. Editor-1 (talk) 12:25, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
165.  Oppose —Eihel (talk) 15:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
166. --Hardenacke (talk) 11:53, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
167. --Nenntmichruhigip (talk) 17:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
168. Heleniyoo (talk) 21:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
169. --Felis domestica (talk) 19:37, 6 July 2020 (UTC) Please stop wasting our time with inane renaming proposals
170. --Summer ... hier! (talk) 12:52, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
171. --Ghormon (talk) 16:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
172. Ost316 (talk) 23:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
173. --h-stt !? 14:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC) of course not. Stop wasting your and our time and do something useful.
174. --Jordi (talk) 07:31, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
175. Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 21:24, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
176. —-W. Edlmeier (talk) 12:40, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
177. No 'pedia. DaGizza (talk) 13:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
178. --Dirk123456 (talk) 08:50, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
179. --DerMaxdorfer (talk) 19:18, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
180. --Dandelo (talk) 11:16, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
181. MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 20:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
182. -- CptViraj (talk) 12:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
183. There are other wikis besides wikipedia. Wikipedia should be an encyclopedia, not a dictionary. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:45, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Other

1. I wouldn't be opposed to names that use some other variant on Wiki, provided that Wikipedia is not used. Such proposals need to gain consensus at an RfC. TomDotGov (talk) 17:03, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
2. I am still not convinced if there really is a movement. I see it as a very diverse subculture that does not need a label. Sargoth (talk) 08:20, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
3. Agreed with Tom, just the four letters "Wiki" seems like the start of an idea, not its conclusion. –SJ talk  01:18, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
4. Wikimovement, and so be it. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 15:04, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
5. Agreed with Tom. --C. crispus ^(talk) 19:47, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
6. I had nothing against "Wikimovement" as an option (there might something even better, but it's fine), but this forced way to present the survey was a disaster. Still "Wiki + Wikipedia", does not sound good for me... (I could still switch to total opposition if it makes it more clear)--Alexmar983 (talk) 18:59, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
7. I could live with WikiMovement / WikiMovement Network / WikiMovement Foundation (or WikiKnowledge/WikiSomething) provided there is consensus for it, and that it's understood that non-Wikimedia Wikis (like Wikia) will always be confused with as possibly being part of us (which is already the case anyway). InterWiki/InterWiki Network/InterWiki Foundation would also work. Headbomb (talk) 19:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
   • Interwiki is an interesting word to build on, Headbomb. Pelagic (talk) 15:23, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
8. I agree with Tom Danre98^{(talk|contribs)} 01:00, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Comments

• Sorry, maybe I'm stupid, but what is the difference to Question 2? --Fano (talk) 02:54, 18 June 2020 (UTC) My fault, Movement and Foundation--Fano (talk) 03:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
• Wiki Movement, even if a bit general, would be ok. But I can even accept "Wikipedia and friends": the important thing is that Wikipedia must not be alone, lest we forget the sister projects. --.mau. ✉ 20:46, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
• A lot of other terms don't lend themselves to forms like "Wikipedian" and "Wikimedian". Pelagic (talk) 15:23, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
• Wikimedia movement (which is notably at a page without the capital M) sounds like description of behaviors, not a formal organization. If they're intent on renaming it, the suggestions here don't feel like they are good descriptions. Maybe something like Wiki movement or Wiki values would work, but neither using Wikipedia nor shortening it all the way to Wiki makes the concept clear. Ost316 (talk) 23:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Straw Poll Meta-Comments

Extended content

Can I suggest this not be done, or not be done here and now and on this page? There are a lot of balls in the air today, and if we're going to have an RfC-like discussion, it might make sense to wait a bit and see if we and get some buy-in from the Foundation contributors to this project. TomDotGov (talk) 21:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC) They have started this premature sham survey, what do you expect from them? I can't see any glimmer of understanding in any of their answers, they live in a parallel universe, that's disconnected from the Wikimedia community and really don't seem to want to change this. Grüße vom Sänger ♫(Reden) 21:55, 16 June 2020 (UTC) So far, today, I haven't seen anyone outside the WMF that supports the WMF's proposals. As far as I can tell, nobody outside the WMF has supported them on-wiki in over a month. So who are we trying to convince? I'd rather give the WMF some time to process this, and then I hope we can begin working together to see if a name better than Wikimedia is possible. TomDotGov (talk) 22:03, 16 June 2020 (UTC) Yes, but as we know from the history of this, they falsified surveys to fit their purpose before, and I don't trust them the tiniest bit, that the current "survey" will not be abused by the renamers with falsified "outcomes", to push for their agenda. I really don't know why, what is the secret behind their reckless renaming enterprise, but nothing in the open up to now makes any sense here. Grüße vom Sänger ♫(Reden) 22:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Would anyone be opposed to moving this poll to a transcluded sub-page? We're getting a lot of diversity of people, and that might make it harder to follow longer-form discussion on this talk page. TomDotGov (talk) 22:05, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

@TomDotGov: I'm agreed. This was good as first start, but separate page will be better. --Kaganer (talk) 23:48, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

+1, seems to be a good idea. Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 06:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

You have my blessing. :) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:46, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Tried to do it, but it triggered a rule about too many Emoji. It looks like we'll need an admin to do it for us. TomDotGov (talk) 17:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

This discussion led to the creation of this dedicated sub-page. The paragraph is just here for completeness. Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 19:22, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

This straw poll was started here, there's now just a table with the aggregated numbers. Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 09:29, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Open for signatures - Community open letter on renaming

Dear all,

There is an open letter that requests a pause to renaming activities being pursued by the Wikimedia Foundation 2030 Brand Project.

Individual editors and affiliates can sign with their logged-in account to show support.

• m:Community_open_letter_on_renaming

The letter focuses on concerns about the process, and not about specific naming choices. With more than 50 major chapters and affiliates and 700+ individuals signing the statement, and more than a dozen translations, we are seeing great interest in this issue.

Related to this: the branding team is conducting a survey that runs until July 7. There is concern that the consultation process and options on the survey do not adequately reflect community sentiment, given the effect name changes for the foundation and movement would have. This served as a motivation for the open letter. Useful links are below:

• Brand survey for individuals - Qualtrics survey. If there are options you would like to highlight outside of the three provided, it is possible to write in your own options and views at the end of the survey.

• For more info, there is an English Wikipedia Signpost article about the issue and a Q&A interview with the document writers and collaborators: en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-06-28/Interview

There will be a WMF board meeting on July 8 to discuss the branding issue, so it is important to express your views now.

Thanks - Fuzheado (talk) 18:00, 6 July 2020 (UTC)