Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2024/Votes/EPIC

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2024 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: sv-N, en-3, no-2, de-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hi there! For those who are not familiar with me; I am EPIC, a native speaker of Swedish and advanced speaker of English. I have been a Wikimedian since 2019, and I’m currently a sysop on the Swedish Wikipedia, a sysop at Wikidata, a VRT member (with access to the info-sv, renamers and wikidata queues), as well as a global renamer since a while back.

    At first, I didn’t have the intention to run for steward, as I’m not interested in gaining more roles and as I didn’t really have use for the permissions. Until quite recently, I got an encouragement from one of the current stewards in which they thought I should go for it. After that, I thought about it for quite a while, and have since realized that I’ve had use of the tools in multiple situations, and would have use of the tools in future situations too.

    So, after a lot of careful consideration, I am here today. I will start off with an answer to what will likely be one of your first questions; What would be my area of stewardry, if elected? Well, my most active areas would be helping out on IRC (mainly #wikimedia-stewardsconnect) and other counter-vandalism/LTA/spambot work, as well as the Steward requests backlog, mostly SRG and SRP. I am a daily user of SWViewer and frequently report ongoing vandals or cross-wiki abusers to stewards, most of them via IRC and also at SRG. In those cases, where I have approached an insistent vandal or LTA, particularly on smaller wikis, it would be efficient to be able to take countermeasures myself, instead of having to bother stewards or global sysops about it every time. Furthermore, I have experience with measures which can be useful to know as a steward, such as range blocks and proxy blocks. I have some knowledge in other Scandinavian languages, and thus I’m also able to help other Scandinavian users with some tasks, especially users from Norway or Denmark as we have no stewards from these countries.

    I am, and have the ability to be, active during the school hours, when large parts of the daily vandalism are going on but at the same time often can be a lack of online stewards to take actions. In these scenarios, I am often online and thus available to take actions in urgent situations. I’m quite a night owl and available for the most of the day, and my time zone is UTC+1 during standard time and UTC+2 during summer time. As a steward, I will of course keep my activity as frequent as I can. But, in the scenario I ‘’would’’ instead become inactive, which I hope not to be, I will not be running for confirmation and of course accept losing the tools. I am not perfect, and I have made some mistakes in my past, such as not really abiding by en:WP:NOROLLBACK at a few moments in the past, but I have since of course learned from those mistakes. Being able to help other users also makes me very happy and I enjoy communicating with other people. I am also very grateful to receive feedback, since it is something that makes me improve and learn, and I’m always open to cooperate with other users.

    I have read the stewards policy, CheckUser policy, Oversight policy, Access to nonpublic personal data policy and the privacy policy, and I am of course aware of them and will abide by them. I have signed the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information and enabled two-factor authentication for my account.

    So, with that said, I’m ready to take on the responsibilities of being a steward, and I’m looking forward to potentially serving and helping the community as one. Thank you for taking your time reading this, and thank you for your consideration. Any questions you may have, I’ll happily answer. Cheers! :D
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2024/Questions#EPIC


Yes

[edit]
  1. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   --Stïnger (会話) 14:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  2. Nemoralis (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Nemoralis (talk) 14:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  3. Osps7 (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   — Osama Eid (talk) 14:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  4. Ján Kepler (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Ján Kepler (talk) 14:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  5. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Fenikals (talk) 14:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  6. Telaneo (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Telaneo (User talk page) 14:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  7. RadiX (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   RadiX 14:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
       Endersslay (Not eligible, checked by MdsShakil)   Endersslay (talk) 15:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  8. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   For an excellent answer to Sotiale's question - if I were a candidate, I would struggle to say more than "what EPIC said"! The rest of your application is also fairly good, and I don't care that you're not a global sysop. Leaderboard (talk) 15:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  9. Stryn (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Active, no concerns. Stryn (talk) 15:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  10. Maximillion Pegasus (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   I've seen this user actively monitoring small wikis, and I believe they do very good work. They are active and trusted on multiple projects, and they are also one of the most active global renamers, which indicates a willingness not only to help out with steward duties, but also to be an active steward, which is extremely important. If the user has made mistakes in the past, they seem open and willing to learn from them, which is also very important for any role. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 16:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  11. M4tinbeigi (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Rick Sanchez (talk) 16:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  12. Ferien (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   I did like the answers you provided to the questions, and you're active and trusted. There is no need to go down the path of GRb/GS before going to steward. It is nice to have but not a requirement. --Ferien (talk) 16:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  13. SHB2000 (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   and I don't get some of the No votes. SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 16:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  14. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Esteban16 (talk) 16:41, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  15. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Maybe a bit too early, but I do not see any red flags Ameisenigel (talk) 16:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  16. 1108-Kiju (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Perhaps they should have requested a GS first. However, they are active and I am very happy with the answers and have no reason to oppose this. 1108-Kiju/Talk 16:52, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  17. ZI Jony (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   -- Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 17:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  18. V0lkanic (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   No concerns. V0lkanic (talk) 17:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  19. XXBlackburnXx (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   XXBlackburnXx (talk) 17:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  20. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Novak Watchmen (talk) 17:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  21. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 17:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  22. W (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024  . Thanks a lot for clarification on implementation of community consensus by stewards, when a bureaucrat obstructs the enforcemnt of such consensus. Best wishes,--W (talk) 18:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  23. HouseBlaster (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   to cancel out the oppose rationales ("only" four years? high number of edits? Really?) HouseBlaster (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  24. Chirocca77 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Chirocca77 (talk) 19:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  25. Pppery (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   * Pppery * it has begun 19:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  26. Red-tailed hawk (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2024   — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  27. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by JrandWP)2024   ToBeFree (talk) 23:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  28. Lightoil (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   Lightoil (talk) 02:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  29. USSR-Slav (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   USSR-Slav (СССР-Слав) (talk) 02:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  30. Ruy (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   Ruy (talk) 03:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  31. DreamRimmer (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   – DreamRimmer (talk) 03:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  32. Bjelica (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Bjelica (talk) 05:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  33. Svartava (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Svartava (talk) 05:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  34. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 07:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  35. Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (talk) 08:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  36. Andrew Pertsev (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Andrew Pertsev (talk) 08:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  37. Asav (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024   Asav (talk) 08:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  38. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024   Rzuwig 09:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  39. Tmv (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Tmv (talk) 11:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  40. Lookruk (Eligible, checked by Tmv)2024   --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 12:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  41. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Jon Harald Søby (talk) 13:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  42. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   cyrfaw (talk) 13:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  43. DarkMatterMan4500 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 13:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  44. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  45. Drummingman (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024   LGTM Drummingman (talk) 16:22, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  46. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Xwiki experience a bit on the lower side, but sufficient for me. Also, good answers to go with it. JavaHurricane 16:32, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  47. Jeffrey Beall (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2024   Jeffrey Beall (talk) 16:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  48. Ocelot (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024   Ocelot (talk) 16:47, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  49. Moheen (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2024   ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  50. Matěj Suchánek (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2024   Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  51. Wutsje (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2024   Wutsje (talk) 20:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  52. Neriah (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024   Neriah - 💬 - 21:26, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
       Honymand (Not eligible, checked by Fehufanga)   Honymand (talk) 21:36, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  53. Aca (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024   LGTM Aca (talk) 22:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  54. Daniel Mietchen (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Daniel Mietchen (talk) 22:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  55. Sakretsu (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Sakretsu (炸裂) 23:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  56. Inokosni organ (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024   Inokosni organ (talk) 01:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  57. UA0Volodymyr (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024   UA0Volodymyr (talk) 02:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  58. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024   dwadieff 03:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  59. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024   ミラP@Miraclepine 03:43, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  60. Baskervill (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Baskervill (talk) 03:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  61. Gharouni (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Gharouni Talk 05:01, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  62. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024   Tvcccp (talk) 07:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  63. Sebastian Wallroth (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:01, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  64. Valcio (Eligible, checked by Tmv)2024   Strong support. I thought they were a steward already. valcio ••• 09:16, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  65. ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (talk) 10:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  66. Lemonaka (Eligible, checked by Tmv)2024   Lemonaka (talk) 13:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  67. Ankermast (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024   Ankermast (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  68. Carlomorino (Eligible, checked by Tmv)2024   Carlomorino (talk) 22:09, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  69. Thastp (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Thastp (talk) 10:52, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  70. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by Tmv)2024   I hope you can resist vandalism for small wiki projects Nurtenge (talk) 10:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  71. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024   Ferran Mir (talk) 11:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  72. Kelvin (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Kelvin (talk) 13:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC) Good answer and it looks good.reply
  73. Julius 12345 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Julius 12345 (talk) 13:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  74. Pinigin (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Pinigin (talk) 14:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  75. Jan Myšák (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Jan Myšák (talk) 14:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  76. Justarandomamerican (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Justarandomamerican (talk) 16:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  77. Victor Schmidt (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  78. Bencemac (Eligible, checked by NightWolf1223)2024   Bencemac (talk) 19:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  79. Snowmanonahoe (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   I hear stewards complain a lot about how there aren't enough of them. Now is not the time to be picky about tenure. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 22:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  80. ChrisWx (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Seems to have quite a bit of global experience in areas where steward work would be required, and would make a good one overall. ChrisWx 🌀 (talk - contribs) 03:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  81. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Filipović Zoran (talk) 11:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  82. Kadı (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Kadı Message 13:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  83. Styyx (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Styyx (talk) 16:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  84. NGC 54 (Eligible, checked by Tmv)2024   My previous interactions with EPIC were positive. Some raised some concerns, like EPIC not being a global sysop or that he takes on too much at once, but he is very active and has a good judgement, and this leads me to believe that he will be good as steward. --NGC 54 (talkcontribs) 16:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  85. -jkb- (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024   -jkb- 18:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  86. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024   Centaur271188 (talk) 22:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  87. Lionel Cristiano (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024   Lionel Cristiano (talk) 22:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  88. K6ka (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 23:22, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  89. 94rain (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   I've had many positive interactions with them. They have always been willing to listen to and act upon feedback. Based on their response to questions especially those pertaining to CU/OS/small wikis, I think they are prepared for the responsibility that comes with the steward toolkit. I'm not too concerned about the high volumes of edits to refine their response, as from what I've observed, they have been using admin tools on Wikidata with great care. I trust that they will approach the steward tools with more caution. 94rain Talk 04:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  90. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024   Good work on small wikis. MZaplotnik(talk) 07:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  91. Sumeor 29567 (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024  Sumeor 29567 (talk) 10:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  92. DynamicFolklore (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Folklorelet`s Talk! 11:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  93. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Ankry (talk) 13:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  94. Weltenspringerin (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Weltenspringerin (talk) 15:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  95. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Miniapolis 16:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  96. Z1720 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Z1720 (talk) 17:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  97. Quinlan83 (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024   ☠︎Quinlan83☠︎(𝖄𝖔𝖚 𝖙𝖆𝖑𝖐𝖎𝖓' 𝖙𝖔 𝖒𝖊?) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  98. S60W79 (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   S60W79 (talk) 22:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  99. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Jusjih (talk) 04:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
       Gqqnb (Not eligible, checked by MdsShakil)   Gqqnb (talk) 09:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  100. Alfa-ketosav (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Alfa-ketosav (talk) 10:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  101. Adtonko (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Adtonko (talk) 11:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  102. Elli (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2024   Elli (talk) 15:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  103. Giraffer (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Giraffer (talk) 15:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  104. Eric.LEWIN (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2024   I am sensitive to SMcCandlish's criticism about your tendency for "hat collecting". Therefore, be mostly dedicated to the steward tasks, so that I'll have to change my mind for this vote. Whatever, thanks for engaging that much. @Éric38fr('tchatting, a good drink in hand), 15:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
    Thanks, and thank you for the feedback. Like mentioned, I don't want to collect hats and I don't have any plans to request further permissions on other wikis. The point of them is to use them, and having too many would burn me out (in this case, the "hat collecting" concerns of SMcCandlish seems to have been built from a misunderstanding of my statement, so hopefully my statement wasn't too unclear or hard to understand, I apologize to the community and to SMcCandlish if it was). EPIC (talk) 16:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  105. 今好きになる (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   今好きになる (talk) 06:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  106. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Wolverène (talk) 08:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  107. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   —Ah3kal (talk) 11:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  108. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024   Laurent Jerry (talk) 17:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  109. Ulanwp (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024   Ulanwp (talk) 07:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  110. Titore (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Titore (talk) 10:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
       Sinatrasona (Not eligible, checked by MdsShakil)   Sinatrasona (talk) 11:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  111. Skarz (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Skarz (talk) 17:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  112. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Meiræ 18:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
       Al Lemos (Not eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)   Al Lemos (talk) 00:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC)reply
       100.undentifieduser (Not eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)   100.undentifieduser (talk) 04:23, 15 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  113. Chrisaliv (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Chrisaliv (talk) 11:01, 15 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  114. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Shizhao (talk) 11:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  115. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Harlock81 (talk) 14:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  116. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Fastily 23:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  117. SunDawn (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  118. The Master of Hedgehogs (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Sounds good! The Master of Hedgehogs (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  119. Masti (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   masti <talk> 16:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  120. Bärbel Miemietz (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Bärbel Miemietz (talk) 16:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  121. Prairie Astronomer (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Prairie Astronomer (talk) 16:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  122. Nastoshka (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt)2024   I've seen them very often and very active in monitoring small wikis, and good answers to all questions. Nastoshka (talk) 20:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  123. Gadir (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt)2024   GL! Gadir (talk) 20:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  124. Ekminarin (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Rin [T · C] 08:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  125. Wieralee (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Wieralee (talk) 12:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  126. Saroj (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt)2024   Saroj (talk) 09:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  127. Brewster239 (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt)2024   Brewster239 (T·C·CA) 09:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  128. Eliatxo (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2024   Eliatxo (talk) 09:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  129. Uncle Bash007 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   Uncle Bash007 (talk) 17:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  130. Sleyece (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   Sleyece (talk) 01:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  131. Aizenr (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Aizenr (talk) 06:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  132. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 08:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  133. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   Natuur12 (talk) 19:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  134. FlyingAce (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   –FlyingAce✈hello 20:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  135. ZERTINHO (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   ZERTINHO (talk) 06:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  136. BRPever (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   The answers here look convincing. I am leaning towards yes. BRP ever 10:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  137. Nicolas Eynaud (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Nicolas Eynaud (talk) 13:58, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  138. Suyash.dwivedi (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 18:19, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  139. Fredericknoronha (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024   Good going. Fredericknoronha (talk) 20:49, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  140. Lazaro d'Aragón (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2024   Lazaro d'Aragón (talk) 22:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  141. Draken Bowser (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Draken Bowser (talk) 14:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  142. Nella.hohlova (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2024   Nella (talk) 16:27, 21 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  143. DonRumata (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   DonRumata (talk) 18:58, 21 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  144. Spielvogel (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Spielvogel (talk) 20:09, 21 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  145. Andrew Pertsev (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Andrew Pertsev (talk) 05:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  146. Eraevsky (Eligible, checked by Julius 12345)2024   Eraevsky [[User talk:#top|(обс.)]] 15:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  147. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Vituzzu (talk) 15:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  148. Krol111 (Eligible, checked by Julius 12345)2024   Krol111 (talk) 15:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  149. DraconicDark (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   DraconicDark (talk) 18:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  150. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024   Less experience than I usually like to see for the steward role but looks positive overall, and my impression of their work has been positive. – Ajraddatz (talk) 19:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  151. Antoine.b (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024   Antoine.b (talk) 12:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  152. Ericliu1912 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2024   —— Eric LiuTalk 16:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)reply
       Leništudent (Not eligible, checked by SHB2000)   Leništudent (talk) 23:43, 23 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  153. Bio06940 (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024   Bio06940 (talk) 00:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  154. AdaHephais (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   AdaHephais (talk) 11:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  155. NgocAnMaster (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   I have read over your answers to candidates' questions. You are always active and trusted; despite mistakes in the past (that's normal, I also made some mistakes before being elected as eliminator in viwiki). Hoping to see you more in global and cross-wiki activities. Anster (talk) 13:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  156. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2024   Taivo (talk) 14:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  157. Z1KA (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Z1KA (T) 17:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  158. TrinacrianGolem (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   TrinacrianGolem (talk) 19:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  159. ドラみそ (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   doramiso-meta (talk) 01:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  160. Siam2019 (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Siam2019 (talk) 13:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  161. Jules* (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   After reading pros, cons and neutral, no red flag, so let's try. — Jules* talk 13:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  162. Ezzex (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Ezzex (talk) 14:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  163. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024   BrunoBoehmler (talk) 20:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC)reply
       Baiji (Not eligible, checked by Elton)   Baiji --> (Opinión) 21:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  164. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2024   DannyS712 (talk) 23:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  165. Chqaz (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Chqaz (talk) 01:36, 27 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  166. Daniel Case (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2024   Daniel Case (talk) 06:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  167. Kirk39 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Kirk39 (talk) 09:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  168. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Darkhan 10:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  169. Albertoleoncio (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2024   ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 12:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  170. Yahya (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2024   ~ Yahya (talkcontribs) 12:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  171. M7 (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   M/ (talk) 13:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)reply

No

[edit]
  1. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   only around for 4 years? sorry not good enough, maybe in 3-5 years...this is stewardship, not adminship. Stemoc 14:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  2. MdsShakil (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Thank you for volunteering. Your initiation of cross-wiki activity last December and your high number of edits on question pages are a little concerning. I believe you should gain more experience, and I suggest starting with GS. —MdsShakil (talk) 14:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  3. Minilammas (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   --Minilammas (talk) 16:36, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  4. Minorax (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Per MdsShakil. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  5. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Richardkiwi (talk) 12:54, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  6. Wooze (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024  . Wooze (talk) 16:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  7. Alphama (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024    A l p h a m a  Talk 15:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  8. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024   Insufficient tenure. ——SerialNumber54129 19:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
    Would be good to know what is insufficient - thanks. EPIC (talk) 19:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  9. EggRoll97 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   I regret to make this vote, because I do think you'd probably be a pretty good steward. But I'm concerned that you're taking on too much at once, having just gotten global renamer, and jumping to steward after less than 2 months. Like a couple others, I'd recommend global sysop before steward. EggRoll97 (talk) 02:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  10. SMcCandlish (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2024   This smacks of "hat collecting", especially with comments like "I should go for it", and a feeling that "I didn't really have use for the permissions" and only thinking up uses for them after the fact. All of us could probably come up with uses for more permissions, but if we haven't already run into a brick wall of needing them in order to do what we need to do, then we don't actually need them. It's not problematic that someone "daily" reporting LTA-vandals to the stewards is creating work for the stewards to do. It's why we have stewards.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  10:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
    Thanks for the feedback - will answer it as I feel that it is useful for future voters. As you have left this similar vote for most candidates in this election, my answer is that I do not at all wish to hat collect, and I do not request permissions which I do not have use for. I also think you might have misunderstood my statement - if you didn't understand the context about the comments in question, I will happily explain them.
    Regarding the comments you are concerned about; for the first one, what I actually wrote was that one of the stewards thought I should run for it, and I thought for quite a while before volunteering. For the second comment, what I meant was that I do not want more roles, but have requested steward assistance many times in my cross-wiki work, and I am willing to serve the community and help other users with steward assistance as well, which would be a benefit as a steward, which is what made me run.
    Also including some related to EggRoll's concerns: I don’t necessarily see putting on more workload as a handicap, but rather actually see more workload as a great thing, since I am a quite ordinary guy and don’t really have much other things to do in real life. That’s why Wikipedia is such a great hobby, as there are countless amounts of stuff to do, and the fact that it’s not just an encyclopedia, but also a community. I feel compatible and acquainted with both my current amount of workload and the stewards’ work, which are both set to the area where I mainly work, like mentioned I will start calmly with the more comfortable areas at first before evolving and don’t feel that I will have problems with the additional workload that the steward role involves - I should be able to handle it, and if I can’t, the worst that can happen is having to remove my tools next confirmation. EPIC (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
    I'll go over your Q&A material in more detail, and revised if needed, though Nguyentrongphu's concerns below are also of some condideration to me. Steward is a really high-trust position.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  08:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  11. DCB (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   DCB (talk) 12:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  12. Nguyentrongphu (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Too soon too fast. This user has acquired a lot of advanced tools in a relatively short amount of time. This is concerning to me. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 11:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
    My best answer I can give to this is that like mentioned, having multiple permissions is not a large problem, as long as they are actively and responsibly used. That's also why the questions page exists, so that the voters can get a clue whether the candidates can actively and responsibly use the tools. I don't want excessive rights either, which is also why I resign from rights I don't have use for, like I just recently did for one of my rights. EPIC (talk) 11:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
    I respectfully disagree. Your time is limited, so it's impossible for you to do everything. You should focus on a few roles instead of spreading yourself thin. Also like I said, acquiring many advanced tools in a short amount of time is a problem to me. More experience is needed (usually years). Nguyentrongphu (talk) 07:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
    Thank you for your feedback once again. I wouldn't really class five years of experience, four of them as a sysop, as limited time, and I wouldn't really say that two advanced permissions outside of svwiki is many, considering multiple candidates in this election have about the same amount, or more, and like mentioned, I don't want to spread myself thin and don't plan to request further permissions on other wikis. Now, I'm not going to comment any further, so thank you for the feedback, again. EPIC (talk) 08:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  13. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Gereon K. (talk) 12:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  14. Ultratomio (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Ultratomio (talk) 23:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  15. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Needs longer cross-wiki activity. Lepricavark (talk) 15:32, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  16. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Mirer (talk) 14:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  17. Intothatdarkness (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024   Intothatdarkness (talk) 18:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  18. Xania (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024   Xania (talk) 09:06, 19 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  19. Teles (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Has a great potential. Edits looks more thtn fine, and I will be very happy to change the vote to Yes with more experience. The early appearance, only recent involvement with crosswiki matters and lack of experience with advanced permissions made me stick with a "No" for now. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 13:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  20. Ideophagous (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Ideophagous (talk) 17:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  21. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   The situation at svwiki with OS is concerning, as steward access implies local OS access. Global sysop is a better starting role. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
    Thanks for the feedback. I have explained that I will not use OS or CU on any of my home wikis (and that is also backed up by the stewards policy), and was not involved in the incident back in 2017. The other stewards can handle that if there is no one to handle it locally, and like mentioned they are mostly able to act quickly. They have been quick to act when I have requested OS assistance, and there have been no controversial cases for them in the 6 years they have handled it. EPIC (talk) 03:14, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  22. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024   Maleine258 (talk) 20:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)reply
       Buffs (Not eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)   Buffs per failure to respond to the question posed about arwiki (talk) 19:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)reply
    The question has already been striked by ElectCom. There isn't much to do about that. Either way I agree that even though I do think it is OK for wikis to take a side in political matters related to the project, it is best to stay neutral. EPIC (talk) 20:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  23. HarleyQuinn (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Need more experience HarleyQuinn❤️ (talk) 13:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)reply

Neutral

[edit]
  1. LR0725 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Due to the few mistakes related to rollback. LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 14:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
    Comment which I hope is okay, feel free to remove otherwise; I have made mistakes, I do some misclicks sometimes, including with rollback, partially it can be because of clicking the wrong button in SWViewer, but also because I sometimes edit from a slow computer which can sometimes fail me - but of course, I hope to improve. EPIC (talk) 15:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
    @EPIC: Regardless of this vote, I do appreciate your great activity at GSR. Thanks. LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 17:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  2. Eta Carinae (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Eta Carinae (talk) 14:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  3. TenWhile6 (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   I would recommend global sysop first. Thanks for your candidacy! TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 14:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  4. Aspere (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Aspere (talk) 14:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  5. JrandWP (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Although a good, trusted user, you should learn the skills from GRs/GSs and other crosswiki discussions. JrandWP (talk) 15:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  6. Prodraxis (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024   Excellent user, but I would want more experience before voting - as JrandWP said, some GS experience can't hurt. Prodraxis (talk) 15:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  7. Funkruf (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024   Funkruf (talk) 16:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  8. 64andtim (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Despite being a very trusted user, you could use some more cross-wiki experience on fighting vandalism and requesting speedy page deletions. I agree with Prodraxis, but I do trust you on defending all of the projects from these pesky vandals and LTAs. – 64andtim (talk) 18:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  9. Enkhsaihan2005 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024   Enkhsaihan2005 (talk) 20:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  10. Queen of Hearts (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024   Queen of Hearts (talk) 04:53, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  11. Sintegrity (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Sintegrity (talk) 12:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  12. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   CptViraj (talk) 13:37, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  13. VectorVoyager (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   VectorVoyager (talk) 11:54, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  14. Hehua (Eligible, checked by JrandWP)2024   per above Hehua (talk) 12:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  15. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by NightWolf1223)2024   Dostojewskij (talk) 20:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  16. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 04:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  17. Hamid Hassani (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   Per above. — Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  18. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024   Feels a little early to me too experience-wise. That said, I have no major concerns either, and as I do not want to oppose somebody who at this point is quite likely to pass, I will just say: thanks for volunteering, good luck and take care. ~~~~
    User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
    00:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  19. Renvoy (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   per others in this section reNVoy (user talk) 21:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  20. Zivax (Eligible, checked by JrandWP)2024   Zivax (talk) 13:34, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  21. 용인 학생 (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   ㅡ Joayong (Suggest) 14:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  22. Jphwra (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Jphwra (talk) 11:33, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  23. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024   Daniuu (talk) 16:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  24. Kreuz Elf (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024   Kreuz Elf (talk) 17:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  25. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2024   Berlin-George (talk) 03:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  26. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2024   PoetVeches (talk) 16:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC)reply
  27. Nattes à chat (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024   Nattes à chat (talk) 23:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)reply