Stewards/Elections 2020/Votes/Sakretsu

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2020 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Sakretsu[edit]

ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: it, en-3, ja-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello. I'm Sakretsu, a wikipedian since a decade now. I'm mainly active on it.wiki, where I've been asked to serve as a sysop and an interface-admin. Among other things, I'm interested in every technical aspect of MediaWiki (templates, modules, etc.), and I happened to assist developers in testing experimental phases of the software, such as the switch from Tidy to RemexHTML or the deployment of new features like partial blocks. Lately, I've been focused on the development of simple gadgets to facilitate counter-vandalism on it.wiki. I'm glad that one of them turned out to be useful on Wikidata as well :-) You can also find me on Phabricator, TranslateWiki, other Italian and non-Italian Wikimedia projects, and IRC.

    As some of you may remember, in December 2018 I requested global rename permissions aiming to raise attention on renames and their impact on local projects. Over the past year, we managed to address some of the issues together, clarify the rename policy, and achieve better coordination. Personally, I processed requests whenever I felt confident enough both to avoid causing any kind of disruption in local projects' activities and to establish a decent level of communication in the language of each requester. I prioritise quality over quantity, so if you notice a wrong rename of mine, please let me know. As volunteers, we already accomplish something out of the ordinary, but I still believe that we could do better in order to improve our global ecosystem in mutual respect of each other's needs and community consensus.

    As a steward, I would keep the same mindset. To be honest, I'm always uncomfortable getting more responsibilities, let alone one like this. Moreover, I have no interest in collecting fancy flags that I would never use. The only reason I convinced myself to submit my candidacy this late lies in the encouragement of a couple of esteemed users. I'm very grateful for their consideration. Afterall, trusting the users who had believed in me on my home wiki has also been a good choice. I may not have as much cross-wiki experience as other users do, but I do understand, at least, the frustration of having to deal with cross-wiki harassment and abuse. If I had been granted the ability to perform global actions, I could be helpful by contributing to and keeping an eye on global abuse filters, blocking LTAs and IP address ranges, hiding Italian and Japanese gross or highly inappropriate usernames as the isechika socks that I've occasionally reported, and by listening to the concerns and suggestions of local communities about the global environment. Possibly I could do more, although I cannot guarantee anything until I realize how time-consuming these activities can be.

    As I'm conscious of privacy concerns, the issue of language barriers, and community dynamics and consensus, if I have your trust, I promise I will do my best so that the worst that could happen would be me being removed for inactivity next year :-) Regardless, let's hope for a great year to come. Thank you for reading and a special thanks goes to those who truly care about Wikimedia sites and protect them as best they can.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2020/Questions#Sakretsu


Yes[edit]

  2. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Probably the user I am most happy to see running: their activity as a global renamer has been key to the changes we’ve seen with that permission where culturally the users who have it view the role as assisting local projects rather than as a disconnected global user group. They actually do have cross-wiki experience in this regard, and adding someone with multiple languages who gets that global permissions are tools to help projects develop rather than a status to be used when they want is a huge positive. Adding them as a steward would be a massive step in the right direction towards having the steward team serve where help is needed. They’re sane, competent, and trusted. Extremely happy to support. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Looks like they have good local and cross-wiki experience, with participation on Meta but still a good involvement with local-wiki issues. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. 5LZ (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  5LZ 14:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Lucauniverso (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Lucauniverso (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Minorax (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Yes, as TonyBallioni well explained above. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Daimona Eaytoy (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Daimona Eaytoy (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Kostas20142 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Per TonyBallioni. Kostas20142 (talk) 14:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Praxidicae (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Érico (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Not so impressed with statement or cross-wiki experience, but I'm willing to giving him a chance. Érico (talk) 15:25, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Frank Schulenburg (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  stwalkerster (talk) 16:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  After much contemplation, I have decided to support them. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 16:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  I agree that he might not have the experience as we usually like to see in candidates, but I'm confident he will be a good steward. Trijnsteltalk 17:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Андрей Перцев (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Андрей Перцев (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Looks fine to me. --Stïnger （会話） 18:25, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Ferdi2005 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Sakretsu has strong technical competences. Strong support.--Ferdi2005[Mail] 18:27, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20. RhinosF1 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  RhinosF1 (talk) 19:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  *Youngjin (talk) 20:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Joalpe (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Joalpe (talk) 22:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Sintakso (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Sintakso (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  per TonyBallioni Klaas `Z4␟` V:  23:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Gotanda (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2020 •  --Gotanda (talk) 00:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Paperoastro (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Paperoastro (talk) 00:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Hiàn (talk) 02:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  Armbrust (talk) 03:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Rxy (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  I need you as my colleague. Well, sock farm of ISECHIKA and that copycat's (posting copyvio / privacy vio / creating abusive username , etc) is globally banned by WMF, but that handled by few stewards. I'm really tired for handling that. rxy (talk) 04:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Mirer (talk) 07:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Spasage (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Spasage (talk) 08:18, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  34. AfroThundr3007730 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 08:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Sg7438 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Sg7438 (talk) 09:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Yodaspirine (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Yodaspirine (talk) 11:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  37. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020 •  1ForTheMoney (talk) 13:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Vituzzu (talk) 13:17, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Antonio1952 (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Antonio1952 (talk) 14:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Jaqen (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Jaqen (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Leo0428 (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Leo0428 (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  42. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  MZaplotnik(talk) 15:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Minoo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 • Minoo (talk) 15:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Ruthven (msg) 16:59, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Gereon K. (talk) 17:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Actormusicus (Eligible, checked by Linedwell)2020 •  Actormusicus (talk) 19:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by Linedwell)2020 •  Johannnes89 (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Linedwell [talk] 19:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Daniel J Zhao (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Daniel J Zhao (talk) 19:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Hadrianus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Hadrianus (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 21:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Streetdeck (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  --Wright Streetdeck 04:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Dave93b (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Dave93b (talk) 08:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  54. M&A (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  M&A (talk) 10:54, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Chz (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Chz (talk) 11:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  cyrfaw (talk) 13:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Plink (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Plink (talk) 13:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Veracious (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Veracious (talk) 14:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Dolotta (talk) 16:15, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  60. ValeJappo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  He has strong technical competences and he is appreciated by the whole (Italian Wikipedia's) community. I met him only on itwiki and I saw he opened some tasks on Phabricator, but in my opinion he has all the competences needed to be a steward. ValeJappo (talk) 16:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Fenikals (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Waddie96 (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Waddie96 (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Hasley (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Sgd. Hasley 19:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Phyrexian (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Phyrexian ɸ 20:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 22:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  66. 隼鷹 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  隼鷹 (talk) 05:46, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  67. 人人生來平等 (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020 •  人人生來平等 (talk) 05:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       HunMaster (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  HunMaster (talk) 08:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Peko (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Peko (talk) 12:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Elcairo (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Elcairo (talk) 15:27, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Saederup92 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Saederup92 (talk) 15:29, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  71. OrbiliusMagister (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  His future crosswiki activity is granted as trutworthy! I totally trust him: he will be a great steward. εΔω 18:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
  72. Der-Wir-Ing (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Der-Wir-Ing ("DWI") talk 19:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Rots61 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Rots61 (talk) 21:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Melquíades (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Melquíades (talk) 23:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Gianfranco (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  When he landed on it.wiki, some 10 years ago or so, he had a lot to learn about. He asked, and that's easy; but he listened to the answers, and that's fantastic. He learned rapidly and well, so he now is an excellent trustworthy sysop, well beyond our best expectations. One of those who make the difference. No doubt he'll learn quickly and correctly all what he's still missing to know (little, very little :-). g (talk) 23:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  76. LuCKY (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  LuCkY talk 06:14, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Aplasia (Eligible, checked by Streetdeck)2020 •  Aplasia (talk) 07:43, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Jfblanc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Jfblanc (talk) 14:41, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       Ελ Γκρέκο (Not eligible, checked by xaosflux) •  Ελ Γκρέκο (talk) 21:11, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Parma1983 (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Great admin on it.wiki Parma1983 (talk) 00:50, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 13:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  81. CactusWriter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  CactusWriter (talk) 15:23, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Frettie (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Frettie (talk) 18:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  83. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  John M Wolfson (talk) 21:22, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I see no red flags here, Support as per everyone above. –Davey2010Talk 23:16, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  85. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  DannyS712 (talk) 05:23, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:20, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Rooiratel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Rooiratel (talk) 10:27, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Wim b (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Wim b 17:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by Streetdeck)2020 •  Kurtis (talk) 03:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Brunokito (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Brunokito (talk) 06:16, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Onverwacht (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Onverwacht (talk) 07:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  92. .avgas (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  .avgas 11:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Suvray (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Suvray (talk) 15:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Spinoziano (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Spinoziano (talk) 10:08, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Mardus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Mardus (talk) 11:47, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Harlock81 (talk) 12:56, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  97. ~riley (Eligible, checked by DannyS712)2020 •  As another steward candidate has voted on others, I see no reason not to also offer my support. Tony's recommendation is spot on, although global experience is low. ~riley (talk) 04:07, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  98. AGK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Per Tony AGK ■ 07:59, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  99. SixTwoEight (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  SixTwoEight (talk) 13:18, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Nesmir Kudilovic (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Несмир Кудилович (разговор) 14:19, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Ulanwp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Ulanwp (talk) 14:53, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Nightenbelle (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Nightenbelle (talk) 15:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Jtorquy (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Jtorquy (talk) 17:15, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Cabeza2000 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Cabeza2000 (talk) 17:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Patriccck (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Patriccck (talk) 16:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  106. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  ArdiPras95 (talk) 02:35, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  107. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  WikiAviator (talk) 04:44, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Equoreo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Equoreo (talk) 10:30, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Nungalpiriggal (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Nungalpiriggal (talk) 11:48, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Chrism (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Chrism (talk) 13:31, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  111. OhKayeSierra (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  OhKayeSierra (talk) 04:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  112. MJL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Surprised I didn't comment yet for this. Sakretsu made a really strong candidacy statement, and I do not see any obvious red flags. I'm happy to support here! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 05:34, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  113. JaventheAlderick (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  JaventheAlderick (talk) 06:57, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  114. ScholastikosSVK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Experienced and eligible. ScholastikosSVK (talk) 07:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  115. .mau. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  .mau. ✉ 10:59, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  — xaosflux Talk 14:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Enki Barthel (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Enki Barthel (talk) 14:53, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Amorymeltzer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Seems good ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:32, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Darkhan 16:48, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Hergel (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Hergel (talk) 23:43, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Jusjih (talk) 03:30, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Coffins (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Coffins (talk) 12:45, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 14:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Pawnkingthree (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Pawnkingthree (talk) 14:14, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Good luck. Garam talk 18:59, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  126. %Pier% (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  %Pier% (talk) 21:47, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Verud (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Verud (talk) 22:30, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Masumrezarock100 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2020 •  Good answer to my questions. Masum Reza📞 03:07, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Chipermc (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Chipermc (talk) 04:04, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  --Ferran Mir (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Ankry (talk) 14:24, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Kind regards, Daniuu (talk) 14:24, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Ameisenigel (talk) 19:39, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  134. علاء (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  --Alaa :)..! 21:39, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  135. TJH2018 (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  TJH2018talk 22:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Stephan Tournay (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Stephan Tournay (talk) 23:05, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       Dany Crash (Not eligible, checked by xaosflux) •  Dany Crash (talk) 23:28, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Epicgenius (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  epicgenius (talk) 21:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Brown Chocolate (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Brown Chocolate (talk) 10:16, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Bencemac (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Bencemac (talk) 16:18, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  140. L235 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Kevin (aka L235 · t · enwiki) 19:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Novak Watchmen (talk) 22:06, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  142. WieKo (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  WieKo (talk) 22:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  143. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 07:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Euphydryas (Eligible, checked by Streetdeck)2020 •  Euphydryas (msg) 14:11, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Epìdosis (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2020 •  Epìdosis 18:22, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Eihel (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2020 •  a contrario of Camouflaged Mirage Eihel (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  147. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2020 •  GZWDer (talk) 22:21, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Openbk (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Openbk (talk) 09:53, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Titore (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  While he may not have comprehensive cross-wiki experience, being a global renamer I think he acquired sufficient skill in his field of interest, that already requires being careful about local wikis' policies. He is trusted and esteemed on itwiki, having proved to be meticulous and fair. I strongly believe he can use the new tools to act independently at least in the activities he aims he would be active, but since he's a hungry learner in knowing and respecting policies, I'm confident he can bridge the gap and become a good all-around steward. Titore (talk) 11:34, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  150. NickK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  The global experience is not really impressive but answers to the questions are good enough — NickK (talk) 12:58, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  151. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  RadiX∞ 13:26, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Sotiale (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Sotiale (talk) 13:57, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No[edit]

  2. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  Inadequate crosswiki experience Herby talk thyme 16:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. SickManWP (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I no think he can do this very need job--SickManWP (talk) 05:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Vmavanti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Vmavanti (talk) 17:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. La coince (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Not convinced La coince (talk) 19:47, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Tymon.r (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Per inadequate cross-wiki experience. Tymon.r (talk) 01:14, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Lemure Saltante (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I think he needs more cross-wiki experience Lemure Saltante (talk) 06:13, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Not pleased with the cross-wiki experience. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:46, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. OSeveno (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  --oSeveno (talk) 12:39, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  not enough crosswiki experience --Uğurkenttalk 19:16, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Hannes 24 (talk) 17:48, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral[edit]

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Neutral. On the plus side we have admin on a large wiki, technical skills, language skills, and some Wikidata experience. But I'm not seeing enough crosswiki or other experience to where I can support (a bit surprising considering they are a global renamer - they don't seem to be that active on Meta). Rschen7754 14:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  CptViraj (📧) 14:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Totally unhappy with his answer to my abusive username question, but then his proposal of userid is something I am very happy with, and in the end is something I hope we can use one day in SRG. Spambots answer is very good. Just a small lacking in experience. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Cross-wikiness was my main issue. He is talented on the technical aspects but he probably needs one more year of diversification. He should request some other meta-related flags (e.g. global rollbacker) or being more active on smaller it-N wiki or maybe on Wikidata. I would support his request there. I would be more positive if we had not elected Wim b in 2019 who is already it-N. Since it seems that we will have enough new steward this time, I consider myself neutral. I will be very glad to support him next time. Alexmar983 (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Can't oppose someone with many habilities, but I would like to see more involment on crosswiki work. Esteban16 (talk) 17:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Krzysiek 123456789 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Krzysiek 123456789 (talk) 20:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Miniapolis 16:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. ST47 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Very little cross wiki experience, and appears to be no experience with the functionary toolset. ST47 (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Rzuwig► 12:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Stephan1000000 (talk) 12:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Meiræ 20:34, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Arraque (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Arraque (talk) 14:10, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. NGC 54 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  --FonAfon (talk | contribs) 13:05, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. JogiAsad (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  JogiAsad (talk) 13:26, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. DeltaQuad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Doesn't seem to really wants the tools, and appears they will have a narrow focus. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:11, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Geonuch (talk) 01:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Poti Berik (talk) 08:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Need more time to ponder crosswikiness, Nemo 15:32, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2020/Votes/Sakretsu&oldid=24929727"