Steward requests/Global permissions: Difference between revisions
5 requests archived |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 165: | Line 165: | ||
*{{s}} '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 15:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC) |
*{{s}} '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 15:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC) |
||
*{{Support}} -[[User talk:Fastily|<span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS';color:Indigo;font-weight:bold;"><span style="font-size:120%;">F</span><span style="font-size:90%;">ASTILY</span></span>]] 01:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC) |
*{{Support}} -[[User talk:Fastily|<span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS';color:Indigo;font-weight:bold;"><span style="font-size:120%;">F</span><span style="font-size:90%;">ASTILY</span></span>]] 01:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC) |
||
*{{Support}}'''--'''[[User:علاء |<font size="3" face="Script MT Bold" style="color:black;">Alaa</font> ]] [[User_talk:علاء |:)..!]] 10:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== Requests for global IP block exemption == |
== Requests for global IP block exemption == |
Revision as of 10:10, 17 February 2017
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).
Quick navigation:Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests for global rollback permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global rollback for Kyube
- Global user: Kyube (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 8 February 2017 20:30 UTC
こんにちは。私ではありませんが,User:Kyube アカウントに global rollback の権限を付与していただくことは可能でしょうか?
理由は,複数の Wiki において グローバルに revert の強力な実績があるからです。--Charidri (talk) 20:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hi. Generally global rollback is not granted to users who do not request it for themselves. In case Kyube is indeed interested in being granted global rollback access, they should preferably come here and state so. Thank you and kind regards, --Vogone (talk) 20:51, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for Charidri's recommendation. However, I don't intend to acquire any administrative permissions. --Kyube (talk) 01:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Marking as not done; candidate did not accept the nomination. Nor should we have nominations for these permissions. – Ajraddatz (talk) 04:57, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Global rollback for Some Gadget Geek
- Global user: Some Gadget Geek (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 15 February 2017 14:14 UTC
Hello, I have been actively performing rollbacks on Wikipedia on mainly the English and Simple English Wikipedias. However, I also do occasionally rollback suspicious edits on other language wikis, the most active being frwiki, nlwiki, dewiki, and eswiki. Having one global rollback right on all the wikis will allow me to save the hassle of having to use a tedious undo feature which often results in edit conflicts should the disruptive activity continue, or I be beaten to the revert. Your consideration is greatly appreciated. Thank you, Some Gadget Geek (talk) 14:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Strong oppose User is blocked in 3 wikis for vandalism. Additionally I do not see sufficient activity or a global need for this right. File:Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 14:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose No --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per AlvaroMolina. Users who apply for global permissions need to be in good standing across Wikimedia. Given the fact that you are blocked in three wikis for vandalism, I cannot support your application. Sorry. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- No. 1: Lack of cross-wiki experience. 2: Vandalism on nlwikibooks nlwikiquote srnwiki (examples) 3: I recommend to the candidate that he solves the situation of his blocks on three wikis and he join to the SWMT team for helping on reverts of vandalism on small wikis. I'm sorry, but with these problems is impossible to support this request. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 16:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC).
- Oppose per above. User has been blocked for vandalism elsewhere. -FASTILY 10:04, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per AlvaroMolina.- Peace1 (talk) at 05:14, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - blocked on 3 wikis but I like him. Thanks. 2607:FB90:5F03:3BD3:0:7:3C80:5401 16:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - per above. Thanks --70.138.211.34 21:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Not done, Linedwell [talk] 14:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Requests for global sysop permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global sysop for Amire80
- Global user: Amire80 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 2 February 2017 22:11 UTC
I've been an editor in Wikipedia, Wikisource, and several other projects in Hebrew, English, and Russian since 2004. I'm a sysop in English Wikipedia, Hebrew Wikipedia, Hebrew Wikisource, and Hebrew Wiktionary. I'm a also a translator in translatewiki.net since 2009, and a MediaWiki developer since 2011. In real life I am a staff member of the Wikimedia Foundation, but I am making this request with my volunteer community account and on my own behalf. I am fluent in Russian, Hebrew, and English, mostly fluent in Catalan, and can read Spanish, French, Italian, and Portuguese fairly well.
The reason for making this request is that I am frequently asked by editors on smaller wikis to find why are some functions on their sites don't work: Bashkir, Mari, Sakha, Marathi, Kabardian, and others, and sometimes also larger ones like Belarusian, Indonesian, Georgian, and Japanese. Almost always the reason is incorrect JavaScript code in Common.js, user scripts, or gadgets, or an incorrect AbuseFilter. To actually get it fixed I need to wait for the local administrator to make the fix, and then to test the fix, and ask for more corrections if needed. This is a slow and inefficient cycle, especially considering timezone differences.
Every now and then I also notice pages on small wikis that are clearly inappropriate (spam, wrong language, copyvio, etc.), and I mark the for deletion.
Thank you for consideration. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 22:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support! --Kaganer (talk) 22:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Strong support Why yes? :p I know the user personally and he does a great job in the movement and speaks a lot of languages (which is very handy for a global sysop). Moreover, Amir is a trusted user and also works for WMF in the very important field for me - language-related software. --Lingveno (talk) 23:02, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Please note global sysops ought not to act where local administrators are available. So in fact nothing would change about this "slow and inefficient cycle", unfortunately. --Vogone (talk) 23:12, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Fixing broken code after a request by the local administrators feels like "routine maintenance" to me. That said, if only a handful wikis were involved, those wikis may also consider a local adminship. Nemo 23:15, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- If the initiative comes from local administrators, of course. I have no objection to this request, if it really helps doing this work, but I wanted to point out the limited use case. --Vogone (talk) 23:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- The requests are usually by editors, not administrators. Often there are no administrators, or they are barely active. In some of the cases I mentioned above the local admins didn't reply at all, and the fix was done by a global admin. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 01:04, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Fixing broken code after a request by the local administrators feels like "routine maintenance" to me. That said, if only a handful wikis were involved, those wikis may also consider a local adminship. Nemo 23:15, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support -jkb- 23:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC) - beside the dispüute above: I know Admire since many years from different jobs in some more wikisources - he's OK and trusty user. -jkb- 23:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support! Amir is always trying to help. --HalanTul (talk) 00:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral - per Vogone. Not very convinced by his cross-wiki work (see cross-wiki activity) but there is a fine reason for requesting this right. So, I'm undecided for now. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 02:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC).
NeutralSupport Although its activity is not so significant, I do not think it is a reason to oppose. File:Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina (Let's Talk) 07:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)- Support -FASTILY 07:55, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support trustworthy, will help. —Ah3kal (talk) 09:02, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support - From an Amir to another. (Seriuosly he is one of the most prominent and trusted Wikipedians I've known) Amir (talk) 09:04, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support Amir is working on small projects for a decade and we could just benefit from him being a global sysop. --Millosh (talk) 11:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support - Trusted user. I thought he's a global sysop already. Wikicology (talk) 18:35, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support no concerns here.--HakanIST (talk) 20:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Rschen7754 21:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Strong support: I recommend him to be a global administrator because he's a very good editor. Regards, 2602:304:68AD:3220:FD25:732E:F177:1A07 02:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support. Amir is already four admins and is clearly trustworthy, and has very good reasons for volunteering for global sysop. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Strong support amir is need for global project --AFlorence (talk) 10:05, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support experience + trustworthy. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 00:19, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support why not? Jianhui67 talk★contribs 18:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Strong support: Per above. Thanks. 2607:FB90:5C91:62:0:0:4E53:9A01 03:46, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- We need more helping hands in this area and Amire's work seems fine. I must tell assign him the Global rollback as well. Good luck ! Amire :) Kaulder (contribs | talk) 06:06, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Locked account for sockpuppetry. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:58, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Really the account is sockpuppetry...?? According to the en:Wp:SOCKING, the use of multiple Wikipedia user accounts for an improper purpose is called sock puppetry. I don't see any improper behaviours from the account. It's possible check out every single contributions by him. It's constructive, helpful for the community. May some peoples will definetly say that en.wiki policy don't apply here on Meta-Wiki community. This is actually fact. I also really believe this. --49.126.237.223 14:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, but policies of other projects doesn't apply here. Only local policies apply here, in this case "en:WP:SOCKING" is a policy of enwiki and not a policy of Meta. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 16:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC).
- Really the account is sockpuppetry...?? According to the en:Wp:SOCKING, the use of multiple Wikipedia user accounts for an improper purpose is called sock puppetry. I don't see any improper behaviours from the account. It's possible check out every single contributions by him. It's constructive, helpful for the community. May some peoples will definetly say that en.wiki policy don't apply here on Meta-Wiki community. This is actually fact. I also really believe this. --49.126.237.223 14:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support Strong support! ✒ Bennylin 09:58, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support Has the experience and the cross wiki editing history to show a need. Reguyla (talk) 18:58, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support. I have seen him around. RadiX∞ 19:14, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support trusted user--Biplab Anand (Talk) 07:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support trusted user.- Peace1 (talk) at 12:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Samuele2002 (talk) 21:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support trusted.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 09:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support I rarely contribute with something as trite as "of course", but in this case, that will do just fine. StevenJ81 (talk) 23:56, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done - Clear consensus to promote. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Global sysop for Atcovi
- Global user: Atcovi (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 12 February 2017 03:15 UTC
I'd like to request this right due to my increase need. I've been actively working on SWMT work for the last two months, and I've came across two wikis that I'd like to share as examples: vi.wikibooks and tl.wikibooks. At the Vietnamese Wikibooks, there are over 300 pages that have been blanked by this IP that actively contributes there. I would like to determine (instead of flooding #wikimedia-gs) whether these pages are worthy of deletion for no content, or the last contributor should be reverted and the original content be restored. At tl.wikibooks, several IPs come onto the website and vandalize several pages: (mainly: https://tl.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=Noli_Me_Tangere/Kabanata_41_:_Dalawang_Dalaw&curid=3018&action=history and https://tl.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=Tagalog/Pang-uri&action=history). I'd like to patrol this wiki and delete pages that are worthy of deletion. Obviously, these are only two examples and my work is not going to be entangled on these 2 specific wikis.
In addition, I would also like to block users. Recently I had to revert over 20 edits of page-blankers on ko projects, see: https://ko.wiktionary.org/wiki/%ED%8A%B9%EC%88%98:%EA%B8%B0%EC%97%AC/Atcovi and https://ko.wikibooks.org/wiki/%ED%8A%B9%EC%88%98:%EA%B8%B0%EC%97%AC/Atcovi). In the future, I'd like to put an immediate stop onto these vandals rather than wait for another global sysop to do it.
I hope that I am elected as a global sysop because I have shown, with evidence, a true need for this right. Thanks. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 03:15, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral I do not see a demonstrated global need, however, I do not doubt that it would do a good job. I would like to see more opinions. File:Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina (Let's Talk) 03:26, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral I need to think about this one. You've done fine as a global rollbacker but global sysop is hard to monitor (misuse of the right can go undetected for a long time), and the past issues of 2013-2014 give me pause. --Rschen7754 08:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose There are still a few points (e.g. distinguishing what is a good wiki for a GS to act on or not) where I do not feel comfortable granting access, but I see most of the reasons why previous requests (for any other permission) were rejected no longer apply. Considering the great development and maturing over the past years, I suppose a further request in 1-2 years could be ready to be granted. For the current need, however, I would suggest requesting temporary local adminship on the two wikis in question in order clean up. Kind regards, --Vogone (talk) 09:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Just to be clear, I'm aware of what wikis are for GS and not (I've read https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Global_sysops#Scope). Here, I'll show why vo.wikibooks would be a GS wiki. This is because all of these wikis have inactive admins, see https://vi.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=%C4%90%E1%BA%B7c_bi%E1%BB%87t%3ADanh_s%C3%A1ch_th%C3%A0nh_vi%C3%AAn&username=&group=sysop&limit=50 (Mxn, last contributed nearly a year ago, with admin action the same). I thought I'd clarify this, because I believe I do know which wiki is GS and which is not. EDIT: I'd also like to clarify that I would like to work globally as a sysop, not on these wikis I've listed... these were just examples. I think requesting local adminship on four wikis would seem hat-collectish of me. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:26, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral, I see your cross-wiki work at small wikis, however I'm not seeing a demostrated use of this right. Perhaps on the future, but now I don't know. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 13:55, 29 January 2017 (UTC).
- ks-M9 do you mean you don't see me using this right on any other wiki? I have sysop rights on en.wikibooks for nearly two years now, if that is what you are referring to. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:06, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- weak oppose for now, keep up the good work, but I think more experience is needed cross the language barier. —Ah3kal (talk) 09:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support in these years I saw an impressive growth in Atcovi's commitment and skills, I'd prefer a WSNT but I want to encourage him in following this path. --Vituzzu (talk) 17:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Vituzzu: What does WSNT mean? "Would support next time"? PiRSquared17 (talk) 23:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- @PiRSquared17: See wiktionary:WSNT: "I will support (him/her/them/you) next time" (well, it's bizzare to find it in the Italian wiktionary and not elsewhere... O.o). --Lucas (talk) 18:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Vituzzu: What does WSNT mean? "Would support next time"? PiRSquared17 (talk) 23:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
{{strong support}}
: I like when he's an administrator on Wikibooks. His edits were constructive. Thanks, 2602:304:68AD:3220:E9E1:136E:19D7:E9F5 02:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)- Struck troll !vote. -FASTILY 20:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral I started writing something, but then noticed that Vogone had said the same thing up above. So I'm neutral, but would support something along the lines of what Vogone suggested as an interim test. StevenJ81 (talk) 23:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
{{strong support}}
for now. Thanks, 2602:304:68AD:3220:6579:27EC:1313:9E76 17:18, 4 February 2017 (UTC)- Struck troll !vote. -FASTILY 20:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support no doubt Atcov will make good use of the tools. --Druddigon (talk | contributions) 21:10, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support. I agree with Vituzzu, and I also think the current need has not been clearly demonstrated, as Vogone said. However, I am simply giving to the candidate the credit of trust, because he will benefit from the tools in the work he does on some small wikis. RadiX∞ 02:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support per Vituzzu. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 16:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Weak support - per above. Thanks, 70.138.211.34 03:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support, mostly per Radix and Vito. I think he would not misuse the rights.--Syum90 (talk) 17:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support. I agree with RadiX. Furthermore, I analyzed Atcovi's edits and actions on some projects and I think he's prepared for the role. Érico (talk) 23:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Strong oppose I don't usually use the fancy templates, but here it is appropriate. I agree with Vogone's concerns. I still do not think this user has improved; that he is yet again requesting here shows that. --MF-W 23:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- MF-W, "that he is yet again requesting here shows that." I don't understand. Is there something wrong me with me requesting gs rights? And I don't understand "again". Please explain so I can improve, I am open for criticism. Thanks. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 03:02, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Should I link to your previous requests? --MF-W 16:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- MF-W, "that he is yet again requesting here shows that." I don't understand. Is there something wrong me with me requesting gs rights? And I don't understand "again". Please explain so I can improve, I am open for criticism. Thanks. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 03:02, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- I am aware that I have requested gr two times and gs once (this time). --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 17:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Global sysop for Billinghurst
- Global user: Billinghurst (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 1 March 2017 01:38 UTC
Hi to all. I am looking to do some xwikisource work, or at least to be able to work with the smaller WS communities in that space to resolve some issues. I could apply for Global interface editors to do the WSes work, however, it is probably okay for to just put my hand up for GS rights as I have continued doing holistic anti-spam work through AbuseLog/Title blacklist/Spamblocklist/COIBot. I am an active and experience editor and administrator across many wikis; currently have five admin rights (enWS, enWP, C, M, MW) plus GR. I have had other advanced admin rights and believe that I have acted responsibly with those rights and can demonstrate that I can act appropriately with communities while holding advanced rights. I am not looking to do more in the SWMT, though as bibs and bobs pop up, I would deal with them directly rather than mark for others. Anyway, I will throw it over to the community and check back in a couple of weeks. If you have any questions please do ask, and please do ping me as I am not actively following this page. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support He is a very experienced user in the technical aspects of spam control, so it would be quite useful in this aspect. File:Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 01:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support. Savhñ 01:52, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support. I am sure I represent the opinion of 99% of all other Stewards that miss you on the group.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 02:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support. Give steward-rights instead. ;) RadiX∞ 02:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support No concerns here. Active in spam control, so definately can use the extra bit.—Ah3kal (talk) 05:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support. Please Sir, Can he have his Stewards rights back instead?--Stemoc 06:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for all the \o/, this is as good as it gets at this time. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support! --Vituzzu (talk) 09:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Strong support. Most certainly. (@Teles: definitely, he can't be missed.) Trijnsteltalk 09:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support. Very experienced, no concerns. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 11:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC).
- Support --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 12:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Dan Koehl (talk) 12:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support of course! --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support no questions --Bjarlin (talk) 20:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Strong support No brainer, but please get your steward rights back when you're able to. —MarcoAurelio 23:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support -jkb- 09:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Why not? — regards, Revi 09:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Strong support, but please be a steward again! Syum90 (talk) 09:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support No brainer. QuiteUnusual (talk) 11:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support MBisanz talk 15:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support -FASTILY 01:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- 'Support'--Alaa :)..! 10:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Requests for global IP block exemption
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Requests for global rename permissions
Steward requests/Global permissions/Global renamers
Global rename for Kipala
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Kipala (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 16 February 2017 11:20 UTC
I request global rename permission. I have been admin and bureaucrat on swwiki for several years. Presently we have nobody who can do rename. As we start a series of workshops etc. this will bring groups of newbies where the point of name choice and regrets pops up. Furthermore we usually work from same IP for 1 workshop and will have to prepare accounts for participants to use to avoid the mass account creation problem. Looks easier to have some prepared accounts ready to start with which later can be renamed. And I have read the Global rename policy and believe to have understood it. Kipala (talk) 11:20, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
{{strong support}}
: Good user. Thanks, 2602:304:68AD:3220:FD25:732E:F177:1A07 22:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)- Struck troll !vote -FASTILY 20:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Support --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:30, 2 February 2017 (UTC)- Oppose with reasons below --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 12:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- "Furthermore we usually work from same IP for 1 workshop and will have to prepare accounts for participants to use to avoid the mass account creation problem" - this isn't the solution for the problem, the solution is to temporarily get account creator or ask to have the limit temporarily increased on Phabricator. --Rschen7754 05:55, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Rschen7754, additionally, I do not see a global need for this permit. Apply instead for account creator right for that purpose. File:Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 02:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
{{strong support}}
per Atcovi (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log) above. Thanks, 2602:304:68AD:3220:6579:27EC:1313:9E76 17:20, 4 February 2017 (UTC)- Struck troll !vote -FASTILY 20:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Rschen7754. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral Trusted user, but I have some concerns with the user not seeming to know what global rename is about. Global rename does not assist in account creation; you'll want the account creator right instead. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Account creator is not locally enabled by default, bur the admin group already include all the necessary permissions. --Vituzzu (talk) 23:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yes it is, it's one of the groups enabled by default everywhere. But you're of course correct that admins already have the necessary rights. – Ajraddatz (talk) 23:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- It's enabled by default everywhere, but the default does not include any way to grant it locally (it has to be done by stewards). --Rschen7754 01:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oh @Ajraddatz: I remembered on it.wiki we had to "ask some config change", but the reason was the one @Rschen7754: wrote. --Vituzzu (talk) 12:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- It's enabled by default everywhere, but the default does not include any way to grant it locally (it has to be done by stewards). --Rschen7754 01:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yes it is, it's one of the groups enabled by default everywhere. But you're of course correct that admins already have the necessary rights. – Ajraddatz (talk) 23:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Account creator is not locally enabled by default, bur the admin group already include all the necessary permissions. --Vituzzu (talk) 23:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't support the premises of creating multiple dummy account in advance just to have to rename them to bypass other controls. — xaosflux Talk 18:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above. --TerraCodes (talk) 18:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Not an appropriate reason to request the right. -FASTILY 20:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral - per above. Thanks, 70.138.211.34 03:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment If the user is an admin then they already have "noratelimit". If the purpose is to create accounts, then this global irhgt request is unnecessary and presumably the wrong right to request. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Kipala: you simply need to login with your account, then open this and you'll be able to create as many accounts as needed. --Vituzzu (talk) 12:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Global rename for Murbaut
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Murbaut (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 24 February 2017 15:32 UTC
Hi friend. I want help for changing user names, one of them in idwiki, I had already offered assistance for this. I know there is bennylin (steward) and also Aldnonymous but he was not always active in the renaming. I understand the name of prohibited and permitted. I am also a member of SWMT. I've read the procedures of the global rename. I also have an IRC nick: Murbaut
. Thanks you for read my request. Murbaut (talk) 15:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support The concerns of your previous request I believe have been addressed. File:Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose The edits vs number of right requests ratio is concerning. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Requests for other global permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
See also
- User groups — Information on user groups
- Global rights log — Log of global permissions changes
- Archives
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation