Stewards/Elections 2022/Votes/Klein Muçi

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2022 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Klein Muçi[edit]

ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: sq-N, en-N, it-3, la-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello! I'm Klein Muçi! I'm a crat coming from SqWiki where I've been an active member since 2013, being part of many physical wiki workshops and edit-a-thones. In 2019/2020 I got normal and interface admin privileges and ever since I've dealt with the technical aspect of the project (extensions, tools, modules, bot approval, system messages, edit filters and interface changes in regard to projects standardization and new-user friendly optimization). I've always enjoyed getting involved in global discussions and I tend to be very active in technical ones, be that Meta, Wikidata, Mediawiki, WikiTech, TranslateWiki or Phabricator (lately I've also started being part of Wikimedia Code Review). If you're involved with tech-discussions chances are you've read my name somewhere, be that from my lengthy comments or from my help requests. Starting from 2021 I'm also an active contributor in LaWiki where I'm offering technical support to the local community there. Being a steward would inevitably make me more involved globally with other communities and I'd look forward to that opportunity, especially for the interaction with other small wikis like my community, hoping to make them more involved globally. Of course, looking after the usual stewards' duties would be part of my daily activities if I was elected but given that I've never had steward privileges before I'd ask for guidance from the most veteran ones in the first few days. Having said that though, I'd hope that my overall activity would continue to be directed towards the technical aspect as that's where I feel more comfortable. This is part of the reason why you won't read much about anti-vandalism in my candidature. I can interact in English (and of course in Albanian) in a native level. I also know Italian in a decent manner and lately I've been learning Latin (hence the involvement with LaWiki). This is my second candidature after that of 2021 and for anyone interested in knowing more about me, I'd invite you to have a look there and in the voting comments, where I've been maybe more active than it is necessary, especially in regards to the antivandalism/global sysop topic. - Klein Muçi (talk) 12:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2022/Questions#Klein_Muçi


Yes[edit]

  1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  I think Klein Muçi's candidature is very compelling and he or she would certainly do well as a steward. --MF-W 14:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Chz (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Chz (talk) 14:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  KPFC 💬 14:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 14:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Novak Watchmen (talk) 15:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6. ElBe (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2022 •  ElBe 1 | 2 | WP 15:34, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2022 •  Moral I guess but I still thank you for running. Last year SE wasn't the best experience for you and I hope this will not discourage you. Still looking forward to more steward area activity and one day you will pass with good results. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Support from me this year. I think you've made up your mind, about what you want to do here and where you can help. You gained more experience (though not as much as others would like) without changing yourself and what you're doing to much. Worth a try in my opinion. Mirer (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2022 •  Vote of confidence: I have decided to support them after some consideration. Their candidature statement is quite convincing and I think they know what they are doing. They will make a great and positive addition to the steward team, judging by their technical support to small wikis. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 16:11, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oaktree b (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Oaktree b (talk) 18:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  My comment on your last steward election still applies. I see you as an unconventional and unorthodox person that is very well competent and can do well as a steward. It is in fact disconcerting to see the opposes that want him to be a vandal fighter - stewardship is much more than that and I think this stifles diversity in the candidates, with particular criticism given to those users that oppose simply because of that (and I suspect he would fare better were he an admin/crat at en.wikipedia or commons). My only point against you is that your attempt to show crosswiki vandalism fighting (as you said in your statement) was poor, since it was clear that isn't your main priority. Leaderboard (talk) 19:03, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Synoman Barris (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2022 •  Reading his statement, I think they can make a good steward. I have also bumped into them a couple of times doing good work. MeganB... …till the end 19:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  per Camouflaged Mirage Mahir256 (talk) 20:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Bedivere (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Some oppose votes are completely laughable. Is being a GS, GR, etc., a prerequisite to become a steward? This user certainly knows how things should be dealt with. I'll give them a chance. Bedivere (talk) 21:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Silver hr (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2022 •  Silver hr (talk) 23:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  16. DaSupremo (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2022 •  daSupremo 00:09, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Pppery (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2022 •  * Pppery * it has begun 00:55, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 01:35, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
       Windows 77770 (Not eligible, checked by Superpes15) •  Windows 77770 (talk) 01:59, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Miniapolis 02:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Holder (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  Holder (talk) 06:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Syced (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  Syced (talk) 06:20, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  22. JAn Dudík (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  JAn Dudík (talk) 06:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Elli (Eligible, checked by Jonathan5566)2022 •  Elli (talk) 11:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Liridon (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Liridon (talk) 13:31, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Arianit (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Having known Klein for the last few years, I'm certain he will carry out this task with responsibility. Arianit (talk) 13:45, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Demetrius Talpa (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Demetrius Talpa (talk) 13:55, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Taivo (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Seems competent and clearly experienced enough to hold this role. – Ammarpad (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
       Margott (Not eligible, checked by Minorax) • 
  29. Big Virgil (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2022 •  Big Virgil (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Eviolite (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Trusted user with technical experience and a willingness to learn for other areas. Eviolite (talk) 15:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  31. TheresNoTime (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  I believe they'll do well as a steward -- TNT (talk • she/her) 16:34, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Toadspike (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Toadspike (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Just like last year, I've no doubts that this user is competent. A lack of activity in cross wiki vandal fighting doesn't concern me. Natuur12 (talk) 20:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2022 •  Bernd Bergmann (talk) 23:11, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  35. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 12:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  36. DanCherek (Eligible, checked by Daniuu)2022 •  DanCherek (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Majavah (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  Majavah (talk!) 17:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Rlink2 (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Highy qualified candidate. Rlink2 (talk) 19:07, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Bgrus22 (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Bgrus22 (talk) 20:16, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  40. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2022 •  MZaplotnik(talk) 21:11, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Zoozaz1 (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  Stewards from smaller wikis bring valuable perspectives. Zoozaz1 (talk) 01:14, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Drumingman (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2022 •  Drumingman (talk) 16:15, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Ameisenigel (talk) 19:43, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  weird we demand cross-wiki experience from non english speaking wikipedians but not from those on english wikipedia that run.. systematic bias? Klein is IMO the best 'new' candidate we have this year which doesn't really bode well for the standards this year. Stemoc 05:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    And to add to that, they are usually English-only speaking people! s a n t a | t a l k | p i t 13:46, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  45. CactiStaccingCrane (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Many of the comments said that he need to do X to get their support, but I support him partly due to he coming from smaller wikis, as well as experience at many, many projects. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 07:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Agus Damanik (Eligible, checked by Johannnes89)2022 •  i think the best choice is to give them a chance. Agus Damanik (talk) 12:24, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  47. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  dwadieff ✉ 17:33, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Mustafdesam (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  let him Mustafdesam (talk) 07:34, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Eptalon (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  I think you would make a great addition to the team of stewards. To counter some of the opposition: I do'nt see the lack of experience in tool use as a limiting factor, as such experience can be gained quickly. Candidates from small wikis bring diversity. Note that I have not looked at your candidature of last year, whatever happened then is in the past, and in my opinion, is not relevant for this years candidature. Eptalon (talk) 08:58, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Arccosecant (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2022 •  — csc-1 23:10, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Hulged (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Hulged (talk) 02:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Zblace (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  I am not super tech informed but from what I see in your edits and what you said in few of the answers I think you have a good foundation to be a steward coming from smaller Wiki and language community. You say you are tech focused, but you have more edits (even mainspace page creations on EN wiki) than some native EN speakers on their home Wikis. Hope you remain positive, constructive contributor and proactive regardless of result here, as the system favors certain profiles and do not take it personally. Zblace (talk) 09:10, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Hamid Hassani (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:24, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  cyrfaw (talk) 14:06, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
       Andyzweb (Not eligible, checked by Giraffer) •  Andyzweb (talk) 14:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Ponor (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  sicut ultimo anno Ponor (talk) 17:49, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Ryse93 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Ryse93 (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Actorsofiran (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2022 •  Actorsofiran (talk) 21:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  Bluerasberry (talk) 03:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  59. babegriev (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Babegriev (talk) 04:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 04:53, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  61. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  DePlusJean (talk) 04:13, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Uncle Bash007 (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Uncle Bash007 (talk) 23:14, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Jusjih (talk) 05:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Ericliu1912 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  —— Eric Liu（Talk） 06:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Mndetatsin (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Mndetatsin (talk) 15:46, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Bibliomaniac15 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  bibliomaniac15 01:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Eduardogobi (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2022 •  Eduardogobi (talk) 02:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Zabia (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  Zabia (talk) 08:48, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Santasa99 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  small language diversity matters s a n t a | t a l k | p i t 13:35, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Luca.favorido (Eligible, checked by Johannnes89)2022 •  Luca.favorido (talk) 20:14, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  71. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  I firmly believe that the lack of global experience is a positive and shows someone who is focused on where the actual work of Wikimedia is. I don't know them, but the opposes drive me to support. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Пан Хаунд (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Пан Хаунд (talk) 11:20, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Xbspiro (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2022 •  Xbspiro (talk) 23:09, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Blablubbs (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Blablubbs (talk) 16:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  75. David Perez (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  DPC (talk) 17:41, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Duży Bartek (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Duży Bartek (talk) 19:41, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Mathmo (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2022 •  Mathmo (talk) 23:18, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2022 •  Dash77 (talk) 00:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  79. CX Zoom (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  —‍CX Zoom (A/अ/অ) (let's talk|contribs) 15:17, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Kamma (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2022 •  Kamma (talk) 17:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  81. BRPever (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  BRP ever 23:53, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Coffins (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2022 •  Coffins (talk) 13:23, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  83. RogueScholar (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2022 •  ⚞ℜogueScholar⚟ 🞛 ₨Talk📟 23:54, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Bio06940 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Bio06940 (talk) 03:52, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Giraffer (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Ignoring the one who is about to regain their tools, we lost nine stewards last year. Klein is competent and willing to help out, which this year is enough for me. Giraffer (talk) 12:23, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Loopy30 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2022 •  Loopy30 (talk) 12:36, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No[edit]

  1. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  The answers to the questions do not satisfy me. I don't see a sufficient change since they last ran in steward elections. I suggest to be more active in cross-wiki patrolling (as a GR or a GS) and trying steward elections later. Good luck. Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  Edit matrix is extremely limited; and as a result I would have unfortunately opposed them even if they were requesting global rollback. The Steward team needs more members from small and medium wikis, sure, but at the moment I cannot support Klein's candidature. I can support him in the future if he works more in SWMT. Best of luck! JavaHurricane 14:11, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. SCP-2000 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  Lack of the experience cross-wiki patrolling as there were no edit in SRG/GSR etc in the past year and also not a GR or GS. I honestly hope you can have more experience and try Steward election in the future. Best of luck and thank you. SCP-2000 14:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Thingofme (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Lack of crosswiki patrolling, not a GR, GS. Very few edits outside top 10 wikis. Thingofme (talk) 14:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Starship SN20 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  The candidate never said what they would do with the rights. So, why do they need them. Plus, they don't have GR/GS or SWMT experience. They also has little cross-wiki experience. I would go no on this, but it is close. Starship SN20 (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Same reasons as last time. No demonstrated need and a total lack of experience. Praxidicae (talk) 16:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Praxidicae, it's sad to read words like "a total lack of experience" after being an active contributor for more than 8 years in the Wikimedia community. But I'm more confused about "Same reasons as last time". You haven't voted for me last time, neither pro, nor against. I went to see the last year elections because I wanted to see what those reasons were but I couldn't find your name except for eligibility checks for other voters. What would that exactly mean in this case? - Klein Muçi (talk) 17:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Now I'm thinking that maybe "Same reasons as last time." might be referring to my given reasons. If that's the case I hardly expect those reasons to change in the near upcoming years. I already have a clear idea of why I'm volunteering to be a steward and what my activity would be like more or less if I was one. Promising something just to get more votes would ultimately be a failure in the long term because you can only keep a facade for so long, especially in a volunteering environment. - Klein Muçi (talk) 13:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  ToBeFree (talk) 17:05, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Kadıköylü (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Kadıköylü (talk) 17:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Nguyentrongphu (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Lack of global experience. Not much improvement since last year. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 17:22, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  I am not fully happy with the answer they gave on my question on the lessons learnt from the previous election. There appears to be a significant gap between their actions in the past year and what they indicate as drawbacks takeaways from their latest run. I'm sorry, but cannot support you for now. Daniuu (talk) 18:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Daniuu, just out of curiosity, what do you exactly mean with a significant gap between their actions in the past year and what they indicate as drawbacks? I got confused because I don't use the word "drawback" in my answer and given that English is not my native language maybe I'm not interpreting that as I should. - Klein Muçi (talk) 13:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Klein Muçi: thanks for the follow-up. I have made a small change to my statement, so it should be more clear now. I was mainly referring to your lack of global work (I do feel that this request comes a little to early in that respect - I typically prefer candidates to have experience as GR/GS, which you unfortunately don't have at the moment). I hope this clarified my vote and am always happy to further answer questions. Daniuu (talk) 13:54, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Daniuu, yes, it's alright now. Thank you! And thanks a lot of answering back! As you may see in the other cases, you're currently the only one who replied back to my questions. :) - Klein Muçi (talk) 13:58, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Mirji (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  ɱ 20:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  12. MdsShakil (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  MdsShakil (talk) 21:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  13. ImprovedWikiImprovment (Eligible, checked by Sennecaster)2022 •  IWI (talk) 04:05, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  14. SHB2000 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2022 •  per above SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 10:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Snævar (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Not enough cross-wikiness. Only sqwikip. and sqwikiquote steward requests. Snævar (talk) 13:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  16. MrJaroslavik (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  MrJaroslavik (talk) 14:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2022 •  low crosswiki experience Johannnes89 (talk) 15:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Morneo06 (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Morneo06 (talk) 16:25, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  19. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 19:09, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  stwalkerster (talk) 23:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 15:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  22. NonsensicalSystem (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  NonsensicalSystem (talk) 17:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  23. AmandaNP (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  -- Amanda (she/her) 23:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Extraordinary Writ (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  Regretful oppose, please gain more experience with cross-wiki work. – Ajraddatz (talk) 01:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Iich1960 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  Iich1960 (talk) 10:12, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Victor Schmidt (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2022 •  Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:26, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Dolotta (talk) 22:19, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Fastily (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2022 •  per above, concerns with limited recent x-wiki experience FASTILY 01:28, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Coffee (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  — Coffee // have a cup // 19:57, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Tmv (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  per above 𝑇𝑚𝑣 (𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑘) 02:21, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  32. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  WikiAviator (talk) 15:15, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  Legoktm (talk) 09:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Fenikals (talk) 15:27, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Renvoy (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  Renvoy (talk) 23:09, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Wilfredor (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wilfredor (talk) 19:05, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Yahya (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 18:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Rubin16 (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2022 •  rubin16 (talk) 07:38, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Lupus in Saxonia (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 16:15, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 20:03, 17 February 2022 (UTC) Not enough cross-wiki experience.[reply]
  41. Steindy (Eligible, checked by Daniuu)2022 •  --Steindy (talk) 23:25, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Ulubatli Hasan (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2022 •  Hasan (talk) 17:57, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  43. -Alabama- (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  -Alabama- (Talk) 18:41, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Teles (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Evasive answers to questions. More cross-wiki work or other steward-related activity would be required to evaluate. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 19:08, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Justus Nussbaum (Eligible, checked by Johannnes89)2022 •  Just N. (talk) 10:44, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Intothatdarkness (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Intothatdarkness (talk) 21:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  47. موسى (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  موسى (talk) 03:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Fehufanga (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2022 •  Fehufanga (talk) 03:05, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral[edit]

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  Basically a similar candidacy as last year, with maybe about 2000+ edits made on other wikis since then. This is difficult. I don't take the same tack as other voters that require GR/GS or SWMT experience - not all stewards need to be vandal fighters - but there isn't a whole lot of involvement on Meta. And there's not really much else on the resume (OS, admin on a different language wiki, even VTRS) to substitute for that. I don't feel strongly enough to oppose but I just don't feel comfortable enough to support. Rschen7754 14:13, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  per Rschen7754. CptViraj (talk) 14:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Tks4Fish (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Per Rschen. I may re-evaluate this later, though. —Thanks for the fish! talk•contrib (he/him) 14:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. SQL (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  SQLQuery me! 15:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tol (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Lack of cross-wiki patrolling doesn't convince me to oppose, but I'm still not convinced that the candidate has a need for the rights (he hasn't said what he would do with them). I also agree with Rschen7754. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 15:27, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Ferien (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Per Rschen7754, I think Klein Muçi would make a great steward with a bit more experience. Maybe you could get a bit more crosswiki experience, in partiular. That being said, there are no bad things that are sending me to the oppose section which is why I'm here. Ferien (talk) 16:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Per above. Infinite0694 (Talk) 16:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  8. DownTownRich (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  DownTownRich (talk) 16:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Operator873 (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Operator873 connect 20:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  I remain unconvinced that the candidate's sufficiently experienced globally. I appreciate that he's continued diversifying his work but I cannot support his candidacy this election. Hiàn (talk) 21:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Bobherry (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Bobherry (talk) 01:53, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Mtarch11 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  Mtarch11 (talk) 07:41, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Brewster239 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Brewster239 (T·C·CA) 08:04, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Vincent Vega (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2022 •  Per above. I am neutral. Vincent Vega msg? 09:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Jonathan5566)2022 •  —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 12:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Jonathan5566 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Jonathan5566(talk) 12:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2022 •  Leaning no, think they need more global experience. May revisit. — xaosflux Talk 15:10, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  19. NightWolf1223 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  NightWolf1223 (talk) 17:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Superpes15 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2022 •  As per Rschen7754 Superpes15 (talk) 21:37, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Addshore (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  ·addshore· talk to me! 22:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  22. BureibuNeko (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  I'm not satisfied with his answer in the question, I'll keep watching and look forward to your revisions to the answer. Good luck with your future global contributions. BureibuNeko (talk) 13:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @BureibuNeko, I'm sorry but I got curious: Which question exactly are you referring to? - Klein Muçi (talk) 13:39, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Klein Muçi, uh... it's question 1, and per Martin Urbanec. But I think again. Maybe my expectation is too high, and I forget you are not a native speaker English. Anyway, I moved my vote to neutral. Good luck. BureibuNeko (talk) 23:07, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @BureibuNeko, no problem at all. I was just curious. Thank you for clarifying! :) - Klein Muçi (talk) 23:55, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Nosebagbear (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  The candidate has improved their activity on other wikis - I would likely have opposed without it. I don't strictly require the activity that others are demanding, but I'm not especially confident of what they NEED the steward tools for without it. Nor do they have adjacent areas that would be an equivalent demonstration. Nosebagbear (talk) 23:23, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  24. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  *Youngjin (talk) 06:17, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Bencemac (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Bencemac (talk) 12:08, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 08:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  27. SD hehua (Eligible, checked by Sennecaster)2022 •  Per Martin SD hehua (talk) 14:46, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  28. 20041027 tatsu (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 • . 20041027 𝓽𝓪𝓽𝓼𝓾（talk） 15:33, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  Wolverène (talk) 04:34, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  30. ZI Jony (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  31. JaventheAlderick (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  JaventheAlderick (talk) 21:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  32. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  BrunoBoehmler (talk) 22:06, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Aca (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Aca (talk) 15:49, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mykola7 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Mykola7 (talk) 18:23, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Armbrust (talk) 11:35, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Uncitoyen (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  It's clear that active on different wikis in 2021. Since there is no enough increase in combat like vandalism, GR, GS etc on other wikis apart from large wikis, so I'm neutral. Klein's experience is incontestable. At least if Klein had other reliable rights, I could have been more friendly in support. --Uncitoyentalk 14:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Zangala (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Zangala (talk) 06:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2022 •  Rzuwig► 12:19, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 21:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  40. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Johannnes89)2022 •  lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 15:00, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  41. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 21:05, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 23:41, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  43. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  I voted neutral last year due to questions over cross-wiki activity, with a note that Klein Muçi should run again this year. They have done so and the signs are good, but I'm not sure if I can vote yes yet. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 13:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Tvcccp (talk) 04:22, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  45. SM7 (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  --SM7--talk-- 09:52, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  46. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2022 •  per Tol. ~~~~
    User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)     22:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  Nurtenge (talk) 13:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2022/Votes/Klein_Muçi&oldid=22898223"