Steward requests/Global permissions
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).
Quick navigation:Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests for global rollback permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Requests for global sysop permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global sysop for Savh
- Global user: Savh (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 5 March 2021 22:36 UTC
Hi, I'd like to re-apply to the Global Sysop group. I previously was one from July 2011 onwards, nearly ten years ago. I was later elected steward in 2014, and resigned from that position in 2017. The last couple of months I have been quite active again as a part of the SWMT (now using SWViewer), and I think having access to the Global Sysop toolset would be beneficial to intervene in certain situations without the need to call on others for deletions and blocks. As mentioned in my past requests, I'm bilingual Dutch & Spanish, and understand a few other Latin and Germanic languages. Aside from my global activities, I'm a sysop on the Spanish Wikipedia and on the Spanish Wikibooks. Savhñ 22:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support No concerns. --ZabeMath (talk) 22:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support No concerns. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 04:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Welcome back! Jianhui67 talk★contribs 05:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Sure! --Superpes15 (talk) 05:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Rschen7754 05:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- - FitIndia Talk Admin on Commons 05:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support, yes please. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 06:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 07:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Leaderboard (talk) 09:30, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support definitely, trustworthy and competent. -Mh7kJ (talk) 09:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support No cencerns. Active user on cross-wiki. --Uncitoyentalk 10:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose, Grant steward instead :P. Thanks for volunteering, active xwiki, why not. Support of course. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Why not.--MrJaroslavik (talk) 10:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support! --Vituzzu (talk) 10:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support-BRP ever 10:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support dwf² ✉ 10:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support Yes, please. Trijnsteltalk 10:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- ¡Por supuesto! Sgd. —Hasley 14:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Ok. --Irwin talk2me 15:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Of course!—Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 15:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support--20041027 tatsu (talk) 16:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Was there any doubt that I would not support you? Savh has proven theirselves more then enough in the past as steward. --Wiki13 (talk) 16:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 16:34, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support --LuchoCR (talk) 16:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Not falling for the trick this time. --KPFC 💬 17:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Which trick, @KPFC? Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- @KPFC: I have no idea what you're referring to. I have no intention to trick anyone. Would you care to explain? Savhñ 18:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Which trick, @KPFC? Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Saroj Uprety (talk) 17:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support * Pppery * it has begun 17:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support — csc-1 23:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support Welcome back --DannyS712 (talk) 05:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support -FASTILY 08:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Stryn (talk) 10:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support —-mirinano (talk) 12:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Geonuch (talk) 14:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Why not? --Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 14:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Sotiale (talk) 23:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support obviously. --IWI (talk) 08:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support yes —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support – Ammarpad (talk) 09:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support --Belwine (talk) 12:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support I thought I'd voted but maybe not --Herby talk thyme 13:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support. Meiræ 19:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Welcome back = No concerns ミラP@Miraclepine 20:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Minoraxtalk 03:58, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Wim b 16:30, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Matiia (talk) 16:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Absolutely. Welcome back. RadiX∞ 19:39, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support, sure. Nadzik (talk) 19:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support} - welcome back! – Ajraddatz (talk) 13:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support.--HakanIST (talk) 13:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --SM7--talk-- 17:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support —Eihel (talk) 05:56, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Linedwell [talk] 13:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Achim (talk) 19:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Daniuu (talk) 19:37, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Sarosivak (talk) 19:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC) (account blocked/locked. — xaosflux Talk 19:29, 5 March 2021 (UTC))
- Support --Alaa :)..! 15:41, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Mtarch11 (talk) 16:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Charitwo (talk) 01:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Requests for global rename permissions
Steward requests/Global permissions/Global renamers
Global rename for Geonuch
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Geonuch (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 7 March 2021 07:16 UTC
Hello everyone. I would like to help users through renaming process especially users by Thai community. I understand that no global renamers who have Thai language skill at this time (see User talk:Geonuch#Renaming) and my home wiki (Thai Wikipedia) has a frequent problem that needs to request for changing username (such as, [1], [2], [3], [4], etc.). I'm active on many Thai Wikimedia projects and have sysop right on thwiki, thwikibooks, and thwikisource. I have understood global rename policy and hope that I will be of benefit of the community. Best regards, --Geonuch (talk) 07:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Looks fine to me. Leaderboard (talk) 07:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support CU and sysop on thwiki, can be trusted with global renamer tools. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support He/she is an admin on many Thai wikis. There are dozens that you done blocks per username policy on home wiki. New admin on home wiki but it isn't no problem. I guess there is no global renamer who knows Thai very well. He/she can help with renamer requests for Thai wikis firstly. --Uncitoyentalk 10:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Per usual standard that a sysop in a medium / large wiki that is not under a cloud locally can be automatically entitled to the tool. They are a CU in th and th is a large wiki. That's fit my usual criterion. Thanks for volunteering. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support For sure. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support No concerns. --ZabeMath (talk) 11:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support, sure. Sgd. —Hasley 11:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support —-mirinano (talk) 12:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --20041027 tatsu (talk) 16:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Sotiale (talk) 23:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support dwf² ✉ 07:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support – Ammarpad (talk) 09:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support, Sure. -- CptViraj (talk) 09:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Tvcccp (talk) 11:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Looks good. — csc-1 20:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 00:55, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Sure! --Superpes15 (talk) 06:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support - what Camouflaged Mirage said. Cabayi (talk) 13:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support-- sure.Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support -FASTILY 07:23, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support-- - FitIndia Talk Admin on Commons 09:00, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support, sure, go for it. Cheers! Nadzik (talk) 21:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support – Ajraddatz (talk)
- Support --Sarosivak (talk) 19:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support RadiX∞ 03:40, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support.-BRP ever 05:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Alaa :)..! 15:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support No concerns. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 05:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Minoraxtalk 23:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Global rename for Civvì
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Civvì (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 19 March 2021 21:16 UTC
Hello! I am an admin and bureaucrat on itwiki and OTRS member, I would mainly help with the requests coming from italian users. I've read the global rename policy. Thank you. --Civvì (talk) 21:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support Civvì was also a bureaucrat when renaming was handled locally and has an extensive experience with policies and inappropriate usernames. Since Italian renamers (me too) are not very active in this period it's better to increase the quality of the Italian renames and I'm sure that Civvì will make a great contribution to the team also from a global point of view (she speaks very well German and English). I think she's a very good candidate for the GRR! --Superpes15 (talk) 21:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support ok Leaderboard (talk) 22:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support of course--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Minoraxtalk 23:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support--Parma1983 (talk) 02:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Superpes15. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 03:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Global rename for Leaderboard
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Leaderboard (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 19 March 2021 22:26 UTC
I am an en.wikibooks, MediaWiki sysop and a Meta patroller and want to help users in renaming their accounts. I plan to start with simple and uncontroversial renames in English first (given that this is an advanced and risky permission), before moving on later to the other languages I can read (hi) and speak (ml) (I do not plan to handle other languages for now given their policy differences). Thanks in advance for your consideration, and apologies if I've gotten something wrong.
Note: On the subject of renames, I was blocked in en.wiki (see my talk page there) as a new user at the end of 2013 as my username was considered promotional. While the block was correct back then, it happened due to my immaturity at that time and do not think that it should be an issue anymore.
P.S: Both en.wikibooks and mediawiki.org redirect their rename pages to Meta.
Leaderboard (talk) 22:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose IMO global renamer should be one who appreciates constructive criticism and nice when communicating with other users but I don't like the way you interact with other users especially this instance where you called an established user's request "junk". Also here when you were told that your deletion was wrong, you tried to make your own policy. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 03:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Requests for global IP block exemption
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global IP block exempt for FradonStar
- Global user: FradonStar (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
The user comes from China mainland and has got the local IPBE on Chinese Wikipedia. He wants to contribute to Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata, and English Wikipedia, etc. And he is not allowed to edit meta due to his VPN, I just help him to publish the requestion.--瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for AraAve
- Global user: AraAve (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
My IP was globally blocked, please unblock me or please say what I must do, thanks, --AraAve (talk) 10:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for امین اکبر
- Global user: امین اکبر (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I could open commons.wikimedia.org. There is "This site can’t be reached" error. However, on other IP range I can visit this. I also could not use WikiData due to IP range block, thanks, --Ameen Akbar (talk) 17:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- @امین اکبر Not being able to reach commons.wikimedia.org sounds like a connectivity issue rather than a block. Are you seeing an explicit "editing blocked" message? If so, would you mind sharing it here, or emailing to stewards@wikimedia.org? Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
2FA Tester for KnightFu
- Global user: KnightFu (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Better security for my account and it is very important, thanks, --KnightFu (talk) 21:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- @KnightFu Can you confirm you did read the documentation, please? Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
2FA Tester for SchlurcherBotT
- Global user: SchlurcherBotT (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I would like to try 2 Factor Auth in a bot setting, thanks. I have generated a separate account for this, so the account is brand new. My operational bot account is SchlurcherBot, with 50'000'000 edits on Wikimedia Commons. --Schlurcher (talk) 08:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done --Martin Urbanec (talk) 08:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
2FA Tester for EstrellaBot
- Global user: EstrellaBot (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I would like to try 2 Factor Auth for my bot-account. My reason for wanting it can be read at Help talk:Two-factor authentication but basically I'm applying for local adminship for the bot and I'm sure both myself and the community would feel safer knowing the account has 2FA enabled. A botflagged account with admin rights simply cannot get compromised, it would be catastrophic. Although I do use great passwords and would never use the account on any unsafe connections I would like to go the extra mile to ensure that doesn't happen. And I would like to try out the 2FA before I get the adminflag, in case I do indeed get the OK, so that I know what I'm doing with the 2FA and especially with the BotPasswords & AWB part of it. I've never used a 2FA application before but I have read Help:Two-factor authentication thoroughly and I also tried BotPasswords on a test account which worked fine. EstrellaSuecia (talk) 19:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Signing with bot as well. EstrellaBot (talk) 19:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done Please make sure you don't lose your scratch codes. Rafael (stanglavine) msg 19:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you and thanks for the heads up. No worries, I have them printed. EstrellaSuecia (talk) 19:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done Please make sure you don't lose your scratch codes. Rafael (stanglavine) msg 19:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Requests for other global permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
Abuse filter helper for 1997kB
- Global user: 1997kB (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 9 March 2021 05:31 UTC
Hello everyone, I am asking this permission mainly to inspect private global filter log entries with little ease. I mostly patrol Indic wiki projects and to view such abuse logs I have to come to metawiki (where I have access to them being a sysop). This is really time consuming and complicated especially since I do a lot such activity on mobile. Therefore having this will save my time and effort. I also have abuse filter helper on enwiki and know little bit about filters too. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 05:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support - FitIndia Talk Admin on Commons 06:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- @1997kB: Can you explain your situation further? My understanding is that AFH is best for users who have a need to view local and private filters. If you're a meta-wiki sysop, I don't see the point of having AFH, because when you click on a private filter, it should directly take you to meta. But then I might be missing something. Leaderboard (talk) 07:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Leaderboard: Compare [5] with [6]. Suppose you are on MediaWiki and see that someone hit a private global filter, then you can't see details, so in this case you have to come on meta and look through log entries that which filter was triggered and then look into the details. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 08:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- If that's the case, fair enough; I have AFH and MediaWiki sysop and hence can't reproduce your claim, but am willing to Support. Leaderboard (talk) 08:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Leaderboard: Compare [5] with [6]. Suppose you are on MediaWiki and see that someone hit a private global filter, then you can't see details, so in this case you have to come on meta and look through log entries that which filter was triggered and then look into the details. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 08:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 08:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support. Sgd. —Hasley 12:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Valid use. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --SM7--talk-- 17:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Yes.--MrJaroslavik (talk) 17:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support — csc-1 19:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support. Valid use case. --Wiki13 (talk) 20:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --DannyS712 (talk) 20:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support Sure! --Superpes15 (talk) 22:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --94rain Talk 13:59, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 17:40, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Sarosivak (talk) 19:51, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support trusted user, no concerns.-BRP ever 05:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Alaa :)..! 15:41, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Mtarch11 (talk) 16:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --mirinano (talk) 17:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --ZabeMath (talk) 20:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Minoraxtalk 23:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support, yes please. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 04:12, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Geonuch (talk) 05:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
See also
- User groups — Information on user groups
- Global rights log — Log of global permissions changes
- Archives
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation