Stewards/Elections 2014/Votes/Savh

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Savh[edit]

ContentsYes • No • Neutral

Savh talk • contribs • SULutil (accounts) / stalktoy • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:

  • Languages: es, nl, en-3, fr-2
  • Personal info: I'm Savh and I hereby would like to present my candidacy for the 2014 steward elections. I registered on the Dutch Wikipedia nearly four years ago, but I became active on the Spanish Wikipedia where I was elected an administrator (& bureaucrat, both rights are granted as one) in April 2011. I am active in global counter-vandalism, being both a global rollbacker and global sysop since February and July 2011, respectively. Aside from eswiki, I am an administrator here on Meta and on the Spanish Wikibooks. I am also regularly active as a member of the OTRS team. Having worked in cross-wiki countervandalism for three years, I have often required stewards for various tasks, and I am aware and respect the policies guiding the usage of the tools and confidential information. I have also been an active bureaucrat on eswiki, where I have experience granting rights and in renaming users, having performed over 180 renames over there. I speak both Spanish and Dutch fluently, English at a decent level, and I can defend myself in French. I live within the CET time zone, though my hours of activity can vary. I had a busy period last summer, but I have since recovered to my usual activity levels. Whilst not having any experience with Checkuser or Oversighter rights, I am aware of the policies regarding their usage and the general use of steward tools. As I have always done, if I don't know what to do, I'll ask for help. I would like to thank you for your consideration and for taking the time to read through my statement. If you have any questions or doubts, please let me know.

Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2014/Questions#Savh


Yes[edit]

  2. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Savh has been with the SWMT for a very long time and has shown through the years that he has the global perspective and expertise to be a very effective steward. This user's historically strong stance on inactivity assures me that they will be active in the role. Edit: I have to echo MF-W, I've seen Savh being direct, but never rude or impolite (let alone trolling) and not necessarily a bad thing.Snowolf How can I help? 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Ok. Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Good work as a gs, will be a good steward IMO. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Alan (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Of course! Alan (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Great work as a GS with spam/vandalism, speaks multiple languages (not a requirement, but something I like to see), is an admin on multiple local wikis. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Definitely. Mh7kJ (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. JurgenNL (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  JurgenNL (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Savh is a long-term contributor to multiple of our projects, and also has a lot of cross-wiki experience from SWMT etc. He would surely be a good steward. Addendum: I don't know what "blatant trolling" neutral vote no. 1 talks about. I have never seen that from him. MF-W 18:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Wiki13 talk 18:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. JurriaanH (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  A big yes from me JurriaanH (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Érico Wouters msg 18:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Petronas (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Of course! Petronas (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Related user. İncelemeelemani (talk) 18:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. LlamaAl (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Savh has a lot of experience with renames and bot flagging, as he has been the most active bureaucrat on the Spanish Wikipedia for the last three years. I think he will be of help in many steward areas, such as SRB and SRUC/SR/SUL, and global renames when they get implemented, as well as with CVN work. LlamaAl (talk) 18:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Brateevsky (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Ulflarsen (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Kippenvlees1 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Kippenvlees1 (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. kasir (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Kasir talk 18:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Always friendly and willing to help. Natuur12 (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Okay. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Montgomery (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Montgomery (talk) 19:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  DangSunM (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  MoiraMoira (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Vituzzu (talk) 19:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  per Ajr Stryn (talk) 19:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Emin • message 19:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Jmvkrecords (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra Talk) 19:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Rubin16 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  rubin16 (talk) 19:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Ralgis (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  --Allan Aguilar • /t/ 19:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  31. -jem- (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  -jem- (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Guycn2 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Guycn2 (talk) 20:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Mkaruso (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Mkaruso (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  33. INeverCry (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Trusted and experienced. INeverCry 20:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Laura Fiorucci (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Laura Fiorucci (talk) 20:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Rzuwig► 20:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  36. M7 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  --M/ (talk) 20:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Ebe123 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 20:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Poco a poco (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Non-stop dedication, always competent and willing to help Poco a poco (talk) 21:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  39. DJ Nietzsche (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  DJ Nietzsche (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Stefan Knauf (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Stefan Knauf (talk) 21:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014 •  Legoktm (talk) 22:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Mbch331 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Mbch331 (talk) 22:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014 •  Without a doubt. Very trusted, active and will be a good steward. Trijnsteltalk 22:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014 •  Southparkfan 22:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Great experience & very good language skills for this job. –Ejs-80 23:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Hosiryuhosi (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  49. DanielTom (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  DanielTom (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Irena Plahuta (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Always around to fight with vandals. Irena Plahuta (talk) 23:41, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 23:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  52. AGK (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Not convinced by the opposition. AGK [•] 23:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Zerabat (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •  The candidate has experience in counter-vandalism actions and is compromised with the whole project. His global actions have helped also. Zerabat (talk) 00:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  54. SamanthaPuckettIndo (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Ok. SamanthaPuckettIndo (talk) 00:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Daniel Mietchen (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  OK. Daniel Mietchen (talk) 02:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Teles (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 02:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  57. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  John Vandenberg (talk) 03:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Hahc21 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  I know that Savh can be sometimes abrasive and undelicate when it comes to communicating with others, but the fact that he knows this and is willing to apologize when needed sqaushes away my concerns. — ΛΧΣ21 03:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Armbrust (talk) 03:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Nicolas1981 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Nicolas1981 (talk) 03:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Igna (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Ignacio (talk) 05:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  63. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  David1010 (talk) 05:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Nahum (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •  Looks like a good candidate for stewardship, and his knowledge of Dutch & Spanish should be an asset. Nahum (talk) 07:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Ivan Štambuk (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Macdonald-ross (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC).[reply]
  67. Jan eissfeldt (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  more than a timely candidature :) Jan eissfeldt (talk) 10:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Mihewag (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  convincing candidature Mihewag (talk) 10:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Philippe (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Sound judgment. In my capacity as an individual, and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Mehran (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Mehran Debate 11:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Dungodung (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  FiliP ██ 12:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Laaknor (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Laaknor (talk) 13:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 13:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  74. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Goldenburg111 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  No problem! --Goldenburg111 18:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Morphypnos (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  I have confidence in Savh. Mɔʁfipnɔs (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Edmenb (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Sin dudas Edmenb ( Mensajes ) Wikipedia en Español 19:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Dekel E (Eligible, checked by Trijnstel)2014 •  Dekel E (talk) 19:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Chris Troutman (talk) 20:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Cedalyon (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Cedalyon (talk) 20:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  I see Jasper Deng and Hahc21's points, but there is no perfect steward. Rschen7754 21:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Mathonius (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  It's a pleasure working with Savh. I know him as an independent, critical thinker, a level-headed colleague and a good communicator. Mathonius (talk) 22:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  83. FakirNL (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  FakirNL (talk) 23:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Someone not using his real name (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Pretty well qualified. Someone not using his real name (talk) 00:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Abd (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  I admit being influenced by a No and a Neutral comment, but I'd probably have supported anyway. Welcome, Savh! Abd (talk) 00:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Bernard (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  For sure! Bernard (talk) 00:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Avraham (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Avi (talk) 00:59, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Ganímedes (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Ganímedes (talk) 01:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  89. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Good cross-wiki and responsible. GyaroMaguus (talk) 01:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Jacob.jose (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Jacob (talk) 02:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Taichi - (あ！) 02:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  92. White Master King (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  White Master (es) 03:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Juliancolton (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  –Juliancolton | Talk 03:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Nixón (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Nixón (wop!) 04:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Furado (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 • --Furado (talk) 07:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Good broad xwiki experience, including sisters, and language skills  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:57, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Rillke (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Very good experience with Savh at Wikimedia Commons. Rillke (talk) 09:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Jafeluv (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jafeluv (talk) 09:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Wim b (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Wim b / [ t ] 11:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Obelix (talk) 13:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Kazkaskazkasako (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Kazkaskazkasako (talk) 13:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Ezarate (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  yeah Esteban (talk) 14:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Quentinv57 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Definitely. I think he is experienced enough and can be trusted for the steward role. Quentinv57 (talk) 14:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Asqueladd (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Asqueladd (talk) 15:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Rosser1954 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Rosser1954 (talk) 16:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  108. BluesyPete (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Bon courage ! BluesyPete (talk) 16:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Clockery (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Clockery Fairfeld (talk • enWS) 17:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Hoo man (talk) 18:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Wikit 18:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Midnight Gambler (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  +1 Midnight Gambler (talk) 20:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jusjih (talk) 21:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Harpagornis (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Harpagornis (talk) 23:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  115. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  NaBUru38 (talk) 23:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Orgio89 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  2014 Orgio89 (talk) 00:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Courcelles 02:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Sure Pratyya (Hello!) 03:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Alberto568 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Alberto568 (talk) 11:45, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Fagairolles 34 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Fagairolles 34 (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Erne Mogilevich (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Almost no spanish stewards here, and he can contribute with spanish-spaking users, I think he will be helpful. Erne る Mogilevich (ノート • 投稿記録) 21:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  122. LMLM (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  LMLM (talk) 22:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  123. XanaG (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  XanaG (talk) 06:22, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Sj (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  –SJ talk  09:51, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Igorwindsor (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Igorwindsor (talk) 10:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  126. David Perez (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  DPC (talk) 15:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (talk) 16:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Experienced and trusted (also per MF-W). Glaisher [talk] 17:06, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Reception123 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Great user and Vandal Fighter. YES. Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 17:08, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Lourdes Cardenal (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Lourdes Cardenal (talk) 18:28, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Żyrafał (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Aleposta (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Aleposta (talk) 22:04, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Phoenix58 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  --Phoenix58 (talk) 23:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  He has a great deal of experience. He has no need to worry about not being fluent in English. I use translation programs to help me in other languages, so not understanding a language is not insurmountable. Wpollard (talk) 02:15, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Wangxuan8331800 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Thanks for cooperation. Wangxuan8331800 (talk) 03:02, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Franck-fnba (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Franck-fnba (talk) 06:30, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  --Hubertl (talk) 10:37, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Millars (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Millars (talk) 11:34, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Dmitry Dzhagarov (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  He is regularly active as a member of the OTRS team Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 13:12, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Yodaspirine (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Yodaspirine (talk) 16:23, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  141. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  1ForTheMoney (talk) 20:49, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Helmy oved (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Helmy oved (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Adolfobrigido (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 • Adolfobrigido (talk) 21:56, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Locke Cole (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  —Locke Cole • t • c 00:49, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  145. QuiteUnusual (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Excellent candidate. QuiteUnusual (talk) 10:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  146. LadyInGrey (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  LadyInGrey (talk) 03:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Toto Azéro (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Toto Azéro follow the guide ! 15:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Buggia 15:41, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Waithamai (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Waithamai (talk) 17:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Daniel749 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Daniel749 talk 17:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  151. NintendoFan (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  User:NintendoFan 17:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Ronhjones (talk) 22:11, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Wnme (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Wnme (talk) 22:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Enzian44 (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Enzian44 (talk) 22:46, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Rome2 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Rome2 (talk) 10:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  156. EKMK (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  EKMK (talk) 10:53, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  ST ○ 22:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Mr. Stradivarius (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 02:00, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:49, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Good cross-wiki experience and knows several languages to help him in his tasks. Abaddon1337 (talk) 11:23, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Oursdesmontagnes (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Oursdesmontagnes (talk) 11:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Antur (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Antur (talk) 13:08, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  163. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  CT Cooper · talk 17:28, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  164. MichaelSchoenitzer (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 17:40, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Banfield (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 • . Banfield - Reclamos aquí 18:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Wilfredor (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Excellent person, user and friend Wilfredor (talk) 21:08, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  167. KundaliniZero (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Si, porque necesitamos mucha ayuda en wikipedia en español KundaliniZero (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Pues sí, KundaliniZero, pero no veo como un steward podría ayudar. Por otro lado, la mayor parte del trabajo de un steward está enfocado a proyectos pequeños, y Wikipedia en español es uno de las más grandes. De todos modos, si se necesitara cierta modificación en los privilegios avanzados de algún usuario, Savh no podría actuar, al ser su wiki de origen, y dado que históricamente estas peticiones son atendidas con eficacia y prontitud por los miembros del equipo de stews. LlamaAl (talk) 14:20, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  168. BRUTE (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  –BruTe talk 09:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:59, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  170. TheGeneralUser (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Fully experienced and qualified. No concerns here. TheGeneralUser (talk) 13:55, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Gamma127 (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Gamma127 (talk) 14:57, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Tremonist (Not eligible, checked by Avraham) •  Tremonist (talk) 16:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  172. The Anonymouse (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  No concerns, crosswiki experience. The Anonymouse [[[User talk:The Anonymouse|talk]]] 19:44, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Tiyang (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Respectfully, Tiyang (talk) 03:20, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Bdell555 (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  absence of experience with Oversighter is almost a plus in my books since the sort attracted to Oversighting seems over eager to use those tools Brian Dell (talk) 03:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Bpierreb (talk) 08:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  With confidence Laurent Jerry (talk) 13:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Defender (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Defender (talk) 14:34, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  178. -jkb- (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  -jkb- 20:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Endo999 (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  sounds good Endo999 (talk) 20:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Lcsrns (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  --Lcsrns (Talk) 00:28, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Frmorrison (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  Frmorrison (talk) 20:05, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Doctree (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  Brings broad experience and language skills to the job. Trusted and willing. Doctree (talk) 20:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  183. OhanaUnited (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  OhanaUnitedTalk page 22:43, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Thehelpfulone (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  Savh has more than sufficient experience for this role and will no doubt will made a great steward. Thehelpfulone 02:43, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Hprmedina (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  Hprmedina (talk) 02:47, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       LessayCatus (Not eligible, checked by Alan) •  LessayCatus (talk) 10:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Reade (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Reade (talk) 19:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Mátyás (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Mátyás (talk) 11:48, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  188. JordiCuber (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  I am de:Benutzer:Jordi (Diff). To check my eligibility see my user page, thx.--JordiCuber (talk) 13:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Aurora (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  ...Aurora... (talk) 02:59, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  FASTILY 09:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Harlock81 (talk) 11:28, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  192. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  FeralOink (talk) 15:08, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Tar Lócesilion (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Tar Lócesilion|queta! 22:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  194. Jorjum (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Jorjum (talk) 23:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Pjoef (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  –pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Mafg (Not eligible, checked by Alan) •  Mafg (talk) 11:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  196. Grondin (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •   Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 17:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Unimog404 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Unimog404 (talk) 09:26, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  198. Lymantria (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Lymantria (talk) 13:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  199. FocalPoint (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  FocalPoint (talk) 16:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Benjamlikesjam (Not eligible, checked by Avraham) •  Benjamlikesjam (talk) 03:10, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  200. I am One of Many (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  I am One of Many (talk) 04:44, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Leitoxx (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  — ♫♫ Leitoxx ♆  Talk ♪♪ — 13:58, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  202. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Zyephyrus (talk) 15:17, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  203. OrbiliusMagister (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  - εΔω 15:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC) Thanks for your great work on it.wikisource.[reply]
  204. Geraki (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Geraki TL 17:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  205. KhabarNegar (Eligible, checked by DerHexer)2014 •  Looks like a good candidate for stewardship, and his knowledge of Dutch & Spanish should be an asset. --KhabarNegar 10:58, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  206. Shisha-Tom (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Shisha-Tom 16:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No[edit]

  2. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Firmly no. The candidate can be somewhat abrasive in interactions on IRC (per my experience), and I find it extremely hypocritical that the candidate chooses to ask other candidates what I feel are unnecessary and irrelevant questions. Despite their answer to my question, the candidate had a period of inactivity due to real life, which I find contradictory. I have other reasons to oppose but these are the most important.Jasper Deng (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Note: I had the same feelings as you, until I understood that his decision to run for steward came up after he was done asking all his questions. Elfix 19:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Maragm (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  --Maragm (talk) 20:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       فلورانس (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Florence (talk) 13:27, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ul1-82-2 (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Ul1-82-2 (talk) 19:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Waka Waka (talk) 09:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Jim Fitzgerald (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 • Jim Fitzgerald (talk) 14:12, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral[edit]

  2. John F. Lewis (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  While I don't have an issue with their knowledge nor experience - I don't appreciate their attitude which I have seen in the past which is blatant trolling of users in public and private channels. I don't want to support them yet I also don't feel my concerns are that serious to warrant an oppose yet. Especially since I have noticed their attitude change. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. D Eaketts (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  D Eaketts (talk) 21:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hym411 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  —레비Revi 07:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Niesy74 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Niesy74 (talk) 20:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Drzewianin (talk) 15:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Technical 13 (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  I have no reason to say no, but I don't feel comfortable with saying yes to someone who has no experience with CU or OS. Technical 13 (talk) 04:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tonelada (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Tonelada (talk) 01:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2014/Votes/Savh&oldid=19980503"