Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2014/Votes/Meno25

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Meno25

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral

Meno25 talk • contribs • SULutil (accounts) / stalktoy • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:

  • Languages: ar-N, en-4, fr-1
  • Personal info: I would like to nominate myself for stewardship. I was elected as a steward in 2009 and I resigned in 2010 in good standing (without controversy) because I didn't have enough time to contribute back then. Now I have more free time. I have been elected for many positions of trust within Wikimedia wikis. I am a checkuser and admin on Arabic Wikipedia and admin on English Wikipedia. I am also a former bureaucrat and admin here on Meta and admin on Commons. (Again, I gave up those rights in good standing because I didn't have enough time back then.) I started contributing to Wikipedia in April 2006 and I have made about 250K manual edits and more than 900K bot edits using my two bot accounts (MenoBot and MenoBot II) for a combined total of more than 1.1 million edits. My work is spread over many projects: I have made more than 1000 edits on 12 wikis and more than 100 edits on 21 wikis. Since I am a native Arabic speaker, my contributions here on Meta are mainly about translating pages to Arabic. I believe that I will increase the cultural and linguistic diversity of stewards since there are currently no stewards from the Arab world or Africa. I am an OTRS volunteer since 2007 (replying to messages in queues info-ar and info-en). Since 2007, I have reported 125 bugs to Bugzilla. I also submitted about 150 commits to the old code repository hosted on svn.wikimedia.org (mainly maintaining Arabic localization. I haven't coded anything serious.) In 2008 I was given an account on the Toolserver that I used to operate my bots. In 2013, I switched to using Wikimedia Labs for operating my bots. I attended one Wikimania (Wikimania 2008) where I enjoyed meeting Jimbo and other Foundation officials like Brion Vibber, Tim Starling and Florence Devouard. Over the years, I also participated in many Wikimedia related events in Egypt, such as this 2009 college workshop in Alexandria University and the 2012 Cairo meetup. On 13 July 2012, I created the 4 millionth article on the English Wikipedia (Ezbet el-Borg). On 31 December 2012, I received a T-shirt as a gift from Wikimedia Foundation.

Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2014/Questions#Meno25


Yes

[edit]
  1. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  I do not see no harm in trying again. İncelemeelemani (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       فلورانس (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Yes Florence (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  A good candidate. Yes, definitely. I'm trust you. You will be perfect steward. ►Cekli829 18:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Abshirdheere (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  He deserves this job I urge the administration to provide Because of the work he has done is good. Abshirdheere (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Why not? —DerHexer (Talk) 19:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Mervat Salman (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 • Yes, good luck Meno. --Mervat Salman (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  MoiraMoira (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. غسان السقاف (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Has good standing and previous experience. I hope you will devote more this time for Wikipedia. غسان السقاف (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Rubin16 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  rubin16 (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ahmed1251985 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  I think he deserves such a position due to his professional conduct (based on personal experience) and many contributions. Ahmed1251985 (talk) 19:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. عميد طاهر (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  عميد طاهر (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. سامي الرحيلي (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Yes, definitely. Very active and experienced user. --سامي الرحيلي (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Rzuwig► 20:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Calak (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  -Calak (talk) 20:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. D Eaketts (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  D Eaketts (talk) 21:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Elph (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Abbas ☢ 21:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Fjmustak (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Meno is a very devoted Wikipedian. Based on his contributions, I am sure his stewardship will be of value. If elected, he will be the only native Arabic speaking steward Fjmustak (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. آرمین (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  آرمین (talk) 21:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Frank Schulenburg (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Of course, my friend. Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Kuwaity26 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  --Kuwaity26 (talk) 21:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Samir I. Sharbaty (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Meno is an asset to the Arabic Wikipedia with the highest number of edits ever. He's an experienced admin on many wiki projects too. I'm sure he can do a lot. -- Samir El-Sharbaty (talk to me) 22:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014 •  Always willing to help and we could use someone who speaks Arabic. Trijnsteltalk 22:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Openbk (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Openbk (talk) 22:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. لا روسا (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Good luck Meno25.--لا روسا (talk) 23:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. bachounda (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 • meta are certainly need more steward by all country its the real plus for going more far; meno understand the mission of steward because he's an steward in last years; and we are sure; he can take the deal tne nest time better ويكيميديا تحتاج لستيوارد كمينو --Bachounda (talk) 23:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 23:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. SamanthaPuckettIndo (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Yes. SamanthaPuckettIndo (talk) 00:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Daniel Mietchen (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Per غسان السقاف . Daniel Mietchen (talk) 01:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Salah Almhamdi (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Meno is a hyperactive contributor to the Arabic Wikipedia.--Salah Almhamdi (talk) 02:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •  Yes (أتمنى لك التوفيق) ، Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 03:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC).[reply]
  31. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Very good comment in the question to all about steward role. Gryllida 03:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Nicolas1981 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Nicolas1981 (talk) 03:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  34. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Very good candidate. John Vandenberg (talk) 05:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  35. محمد الفلسطيني (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •  --محمد الفلسطيني (talk) 07:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Nahum (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •  Looks like a good candidate, and we need an Arabic-speaking steward IMHO. Nahum (talk) 07:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Ibrahim.ID (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •  deserve it, without bias Ibrahim.ID (talk) 08:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Ivan Štambuk (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Emara (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •  He deserves it for his previous experience Emara (talk) 09:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Rome2 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Ok, good user Rome2 (talk) 10:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  41. باسم (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •  Meno25 have served Arabic Wikipedia generously for many years now, and given the chance he can do a very good job. I'm very confident he'll be a good steward--باسم (talk) 10:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Yp8080123 (Not eligible, checked by Igna) •  chinese Yp8080123 (talk) 11:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Jon Harald Søby (talk) 11:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Dungodung (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  FiliP ██ 12:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Clockery (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Clockery Fairfeld (talk • enWS) 12:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Bo hessin (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Bo hessin (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Laaknor (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Laaknor (talk) 13:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  47. DanielTom (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  DanielTom (talk) 15:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Zaher kadour (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  👍 Zaher talk 16:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Goldenburg111 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  --Goldenburg111 16:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Mazenms (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Mazenms (talk) 17:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  51. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Avocato (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Avocato (talk) 18:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Mohammedbas (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  albebas (talk) 19:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Cedalyon (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Cedalyon (talk) 20:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  55. درفش کاویانی (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 20:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Holder (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Holder (talk) 20:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Mardetanha (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  please don't leave us this time Mardetanha talk 20:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Érico Wouters msg 22:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  59. JB82 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  He has done good work and I believe he deserves the post of steward. JB82 (talk) 22:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Abd (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Abd (talk) 00:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  61. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Good, reliable and appears to have the spare time required. GyaroMaguus (talk) 01:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Jacob.jose (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Jacob (talk) 01:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Juliancolton (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  –Juliancolton | Talk 03:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Sicaspi (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Sicaspi (talk) 07:13, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  log term trusted contributor, language skills will be helpful  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Alexanderps (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Great user, I'll trust him again. Alex Pereira falaê 10:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Kaganer (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Kaganer (talk) 10:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Omnipaedista (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Omnipaedista (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  71. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  --GZWDer (talk) 13:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Jafeluv (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jafeluv (talk) 13:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  He has a good record. I would not hold against him the fact he resigned a position because of lack of time in the past. Situations change after one accepts a position. Wpollard (talk) 13:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Wikit 18:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Niesy74 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Niesy74 (talk) 20:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Oscar (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  oscar (talk) 21:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jusjih (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Courcelles 02:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  78. John Reaves (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  John Reaves (talk) 03:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Габдулгани НИШ ХБН (Not eligible, checked by Igna) •  Габдулгани НИШ ХБН (talk) 04:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  No problem. Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  80. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  After considering the opposes and supports, I decided Meno25 is trusted enough and has some previous experience, so I will give them the benefit of the doubt. PiRSquared17 (talk) 11:40, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Sammyday (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Sammyday (talk) 13:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Miks3001 (Not eligible, checked by Alan) •  Miks3001 (talk) 17:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Aude (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Aude (talk) 08:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Sj (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  Excellent past work, thoughtful, needed language skills. –SJ talk  09:48, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Mohamed Ouda (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  Meno is a very active and helpful user Mohamed Ouda (talk) 10:07, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Happy to give him the chance Glaisher [talk] 16:23, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Żyrafał (talk) 18:23, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Asaifm (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Meno is one of the most helpful people I met in the community. He is very dedicated to the concept of sum of all human knowledge and encourages everyone to reach their full potential. Asaifm (talk) 19:53, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Housterdam (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Very good candidate. Housterdam (talk) 21:36, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Guerillero 02:25, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Jonathunder (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jonathunder (talk) 05:05, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  91. This, that and the other (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  This, that and the other (talk) 09:22, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Yodaspirine (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Yodaspirine (talk) 16:26, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  93. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  I'm willing to vote yes. Just stay active! 1ForTheMoney (talk) 20:37, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Locke Cole (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  —Locke Cole • t • c 00:47, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Xqt (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •   @xqt 10:09, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Goldzahn (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Goldzahn (talk) 19:23, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Ronhjones (talk) 22:04, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Wnme (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Wnme (talk) 22:20, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  99. EKMK (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  EKMK (talk) 10:49, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Maurice07 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Maurice07 (talk) 00:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  Shizhao (talk) 00:42, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Mr. Stradivarius (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 01:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Tarawneh (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  I have known him for the last 8 years. I can't think of any other Wikipedian than would fit into this, better than him. Tarawneh (talk) 11:16, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Good interwiki implications with OTRS. Abaddon1337 (talk) 11:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  105. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  CT Cooper · talk 17:21, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  106. MichaelSchoenitzer (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 17:37, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  107. LlamaAl (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  LlamaAl (talk) 03:17, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Technical 13 (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Technical 13 (talk) 03:59, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  109. KundaliniZero (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  KundaliniZero (talk) 05:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Ganesh Paudel (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  --Ganesh Paudel (talk) 05:14, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  111. វ័ណថារិទ្ធ (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  វ័ណថារិទ្ធ (Vantharith) (talk) 07:33, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  112. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 10:03, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  114. TheGeneralUser (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Although experienced and qualified, I agree with the concerns that have been raised by many other users about the low level of activity when they served as a Steward previously. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and I believe that he can be given a second chance. TheGeneralUser (talk) 12:15, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Wertuose (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Wertuose (talk) 13:35, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Jim Fitzgerald (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 • Strongly for. Jim Fitzgerald (talk) 14:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Alpertron (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Alpertron (talk) 16:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Tremonist (Not eligible, checked by Avraham) •  Tremonist (talk) 16:35, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Tonelada (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Tonelada (talk) 01:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Bpierreb (talk) 07:56, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  120. محک (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Ταπυροι (گپ) 15:32, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  121. -jkb- (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  -jkb- 20:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Sonia Sevilla (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  Are you Coptic or Muslim!? Sonia Sevilla (talk) 02:13, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Winterst (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  Winterst (talk) 06:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  124. لطرش أحمد الهاشمي (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  A. Latreche ✉ 16:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Doctree (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  Doctree (talk) 20:32, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  126. OhanaUnited (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  Just a procedural matter OhanaUnitedTalk page 23:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       LessayCatus (Not eligible, checked by Alan) •  LessayCatus (talk) 10:13, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Triquetra (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Triquetra (talk) 18:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Mátyás (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Mátyás (talk) 11:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Harlock81 (talk) 12:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  130. JordiCuber (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  I am de:Benutzer:Jordi (Diff). To check my eligibility see my user page, thx.--JordiCuber (talk) 13:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  131. محمد أحمد عبد الفتاح (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  أثق في أن لديه ما تتطلبه الصلاحية. بالتوفيق. Mohammed Ahmed (talk) 20:16, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Mala chaubey (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  Mala chaubey (talk) 07:46, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  FASTILY 09:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  134. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  I am Ellie Kesselman. I am Jewish and female and a widow. Meno25 showed good judgment and sensitivity, in dealing with me during my early days with assorted Wiki's, unlike others <glower> who shall not be named. Note that Meno25 was given an account on the Toolserver, used it, and didn't do anything that resulted in loss of privilege for 5 consecutive years. He has prior experience as a Steward, which should be perceived as a feature, not a bug, despite the brevity of his tenure. Last, but not least, it seems essential to have at least one Steward with Arabic language fluency. FeralOink (talk) 12:40, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Tar Lócesilion (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Tar Lócesilion|queta! 22:06, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  136. MrJoker07 (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •  MrJoker07 (talk) 16:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Grondin (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •  A good candidate.  Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 17:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •  Anatoliy (talk) 21:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  I'm not happy with the rational of becoming a steward and then becoming more active in steward areas again, but Meno does bring language skills and past experience. Besides, if he is entirely inactive, there are always confirmations in a year. Ajraddatz (Talk) 04:46, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Coffins (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Coffins (talk) 17:26, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Dz.bedaya (Not eligible, checked by LlamaAl) •  Dz.bedaya (talk) 18:59, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Aristeas (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Aristeas (talk) 19:03, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  142. I am One of Many (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  I am One of Many (talk) 04:48, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Eonzoikos (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Eonzoikos (talk) 14:44, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Zyephyrus (talk) 15:16, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Geraki (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Geraki TL 17:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  146. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Yes,you can be a Stewards. 小躍 (talk) 08:30, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  147. KhabarNegar (Eligible, checked by DerHexer)2014 •  Looks like a good candidate, --KhabarNegar 10:41, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Ruslik0 (Eligible, checked by DerHexer)2014 •  He was not very active in the past but I think it would be good to have ar-N steward. Ruslik (talk) 12:48, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  2. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Meno25 was essentially active for only two months in his past term as steward, and not even particularly so. He has not been active in the SWMT or on meta requests page. The statement by this user gives a lot of details about their activity on Wikimedia, but it does not address my concern that if their activity dropped so low after just two months it might do so again this time, despite their best intention. If they had shown their intention to be active by taking an active role in the SWMT since deciding to run for stewardship, I would gladly be supporting their candidature but they have not done so. Also per MF-Warburg. Snowolf How can I help? 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  I don't think that the way to „get more involved in Meta-Wiki affairs“ is running for steward. Also I see no merit whatsoever in attending Wikimania and meeting people there and getting t-shirts. I find it very unapt and reflecting badly on the candidate's suitability if you mention that in a steward candidature. MF-W 18:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm simply just an observer and happened to come across your comment. Are you saying Wikimania is useless? I agree that there is no merit in attending but that's not the point at all. There are tons of "extremely important" discusses going on during Wikimania. take a look here. They are not some random topics. All of the discussions are directly concern about the future of Wikipedia or related issues. To me, those discussions are far more important than writing articles or any stewards' tasks. I'm not saying writing articles and stewards' tasks are not important. Sure, they are, but the difference is you can do it any time and Wikimania is only once per year. Plus the impact of those discussions are huge, not yet, but in the future. I would applaud anyone who spent the time and resources needed to attend a Wikimania. Have you ever been to one? If not, then you shouldn't have judged anyone that went. I'm shocked to see that a steward like you can utter such a statement regarding Wikimania, the most important off-line activity in all Wikimedia Foundation.75.168.125.23 22:03, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I didn't want to give an opinion about the importance of Wikimania here. In fact I plan to go to Wikimania this year and have made a submission for it. What I wanted to say is that I don't see how attending Wikimania "where I enjoyed meeting Jimbo and other[s]" is relevant to steward elections. --MF-W 20:22, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    It's your own opinion to think that it is not relevant to the steward election, and there is nothing wrong with that. What was wrong is this "I find it very unapt and reflecting badly on the candidate's suitability if you mention that in a steward candidature." In my point of view, it shows his passion about Wikimedia project. I would consider that passion is one of the great traits any steward should have. Even if you think going to Wikimania doesn't help the steward election, but surely it can't hurt. The only way it can hurt the steward candidate is if going to Wikimania is considered as a bad activity by many people. Note side: Good to know that you're attending Wikimania. That would be an eye opener.75.168.125.23 03:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. John F. Lewis (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  I don't really think Meno is going to use the steward toolset much. There is a lack of activity which makes me feel they will not be too active as a steward. Also per Snowolf etc. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Alan (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Alan (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Brateevsky (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Per above DangSunM (talk) 19:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Purely on account of lack of activity. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  David1010 (talk) 05:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Bene* (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Bene* (talk) 11:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Karol Karolus (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Karol Karolus (talk) 14:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Base (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Base (talk) 20:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Mathonius (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  I'd rather see someone become active for at least a while first and then run for stewardship, not the other way around. I agree with MF-Warburg. Mathonius (talk) 22:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Obelix (talk) 13:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Quentinv57 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  mostly per Snowolf. I'm sure he can be trusted but we need active stewards. Quentinv57 (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    If you don't elect this guy elected as a steward, then he can not be an active steward anyway. However, if he is elected as a steward, may be he is going to be an active one. The more trusted users we have as stewards, the more likelihood that there will be more "active" stewards. On a positive note, he resigned when he couldn't be active. (NOTE: I don't know this guy personally, I felt he can be trusted to be a steward) --Jacob (talk) 00:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    That's not an accurate statement. He resigned shortly before reconfirmations and months and months after being virtually inactive. Snowolf How can I help? 23:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Per Quentinv57 and Snowolf. We need active stew. Sorry this time. :-( Pratyya (Hello!) 15:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Alberto568 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Alberto568 (talk) 11:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Drzewianin (talk) 15:45, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. ترجمان05 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  ترجمان05 (talk) 21:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  --Hubertl (talk) 10:26, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Ul1-82-2 (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Ul1-82-2 (talk) 19:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Zhuyifei1999 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Per some stewards above. Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Gamma127 (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  per Snowolf Gamma127 (talk) 14:55, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Kiefer.Wolfowitz (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  A record of having been elected to this office only to resign it after serving a few months. Also, of all villains of antiquity, Meno's vice was perhaps the most notorious, so I distrust any editor naming his account "Meno". Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 17:14, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Minihaa (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  Minihaa (talk) 15:23, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  2. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Don't want to vote either yes or no. No yes because the low amount of activity. Also not a "no" because you were a steward before. Wiki13 talk 18:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ralgis (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  --Allan Aguilar • /t/ 19:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Emin • message 19:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Guycn2 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Guycn2 (talk) 19:54, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Ebe123 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 20:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014 •  Inactive. Legoktm (talk) 22:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014 •  Southparkfan 22:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. AGK (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  AGK [•] 23:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Armbrust (talk) 03:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Zerabat (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •  The user has good intentions and some previous experience, but his inactivity could not help the project. However, that reason is not enough to vote «No». I could change my vote depending of the future answers. Zerabat (talk) 05:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Stryn (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Like others, I'm torn between yes and no on Meno25. Meno25's statements and reasoning don't inspire confidence but they're not unqualified, either. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Midnight Gambler (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Voting here, but wish you good luck. Midnight Gambler (talk) 17:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  AmaryllisGardener (talk) 00:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  NaBUru38 (talk) 16:18, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. יונה בנדלאק (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Yona B. 11:13, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  ST ○ 22:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Oursdesmontagnes (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Oursdesmontagnes (talk) 11:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Waka Waka (talk) 08:59, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. The Anonymouse (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Statement is not very convincing. No major issues to oppose over, but not enough confidence to support. The Anonymouse [talk] 19:41, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Reade (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Reade (talk) 19:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Benjamlikesjam (Not eligible, checked by Avraham) •  Benjamlikesjam (talk) 02:58, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2014/Votes/Meno25&oldid=24877548"