Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2017/Votes/Matiia

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2017 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: es, en-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hi.

    I've thought a lot about this, and as we need more active stewards, I've decided to nominate myself for stewardship. I registered on Wikimedia projects in 2014 and I've been a very active Wikimedian since then. My native language is Spanish, I can speak English at an intermediate level and I understand a few other Romance languages on a basic level. I started doing global counter vandalism/spam in 2014 and became a global rollbacker, a global sysop and an admin here on Meta-Wiki in 2015. I'm also a local op on a few Wikimedia IRC channels. As you may see here, this is my second nomination for stewardship (I've gained more experience since then).

    I mainly focus on anti-vandalism/spam work, but I try to help users as well (mainly in Spanish language IRC channels and on OTRS).

    As a steward, I'd like to help out granting/removing local bots too and global user rights, locking/gblocking spambots/spammers/vandals/LTAs, handling miscellaneous requests, etc (I'll try to help on any page where I think I can be useful). I'm daily available on IRC, so I can help out with requests made via IRC as well. Thanks for your time :). Matiia (talk) 19:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)reply
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2017/Questions#Matiia


Yes

[edit]
  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Excellent candidate, in my opinion even the best-suited in the candidate pool. Vogone (talk) 14:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  2. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Alchimista)2017   Steinsplitter (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  3. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Matiia's activity is great and exactly what we need for a steward. His comportment is also flawless and in the answers to the SE questions he has shown that he understands the policies very well. --MF-W 14:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  4. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Stryn (talk) 14:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  5. Juliancolton (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Active, trusted, and helpful. –Juliancolton | Talk 14:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  6. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   per Vogone KPFC💬 14:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  7. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Vituzzu (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  8. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Natuur12 (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  9. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   per Vogone. Trusted and competend user, with a lot of croswiki experience. —Ah3kal (talk) 14:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  10. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   GZWDer (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  11. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Good to go! Good to go! And Good to go! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  12. Emir of Wikipedia (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  13. Lingveno (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Lingveno (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  14. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017   Obviously qualified. Give him the tools! Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  15. Ks-M9 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017   --Ks-M9 [disc.] 14:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  16. OJJ (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017   Good candidate. --OJJ (talk) 14:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  17. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017  The user has been quite active in the last time in cross-wiki vandalism patrolling. Candidate ideal to be part of the stewards team. —Alvaro Molina ( - ) 14:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  18. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Excellent candidate Herby talk thyme 14:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  19. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Approved by the cabal. SPQRobin (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  20. JFG (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Totally legit. JFG (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  21. Pearli (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017   well, good to go Pearli (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  22. Yeza (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Of course Yeza (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  23. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017   Miniapolis 15:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  24. -revi (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   — regards, Revi 15:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  25. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   It appears that he will be a solid contributor; he understands the expectations, appears even-handed and is multilingual, which Wikipedia needs more of. Stevenmitchell (talk) 15:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  26. Cookie (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Trusted and always helpful. Anna (talk) 15:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  27. NickK (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017   Good and relevant experience and very comprehensive answers — NickK (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  28. Érico (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Érico (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  29. Satnam S Virdi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Satnam S Virdi (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  30. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   B20180 (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Gorlingor (Not eligible, checked by NahidSultan)   Gorlingor (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  31. QEDK (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   QEDK (talk) 16:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  32. Ooo86 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Ooo86 (talk) 16:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  33. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Excellent candidate Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 17:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  34. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   MZaplotnik (contribs) 17:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  35. Neonek12 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Neonek12 (talk) 17:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  36. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   --Hannes 24 (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  37. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017  -- Cameron11598 (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  38. Kipsde (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Kipsde (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  39. Kirsan (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Kirsan (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  40. Ankry (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Ankry (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  41. Balles2601 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Balles2601 (talk) 17:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  42. CAPTAIN RAJU (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  43. Nungalpiriggal (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Nungalpiriggal (talk) 17:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  44. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 17:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  45. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   I'm glad he relented and decided to run! Great candidate of course. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  46. Luke081515 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Luke081515 18:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  47. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Ferran Mir (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  48. Adog104 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Adog104 Talk to me 19:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  49. DatGuy (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   DatGuy (talk) 19:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  50. Raimundo Pastor (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Experiencia, ilusión, y objetivos claros. Raimundo Pastor (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  51. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Milad A380 talk 19:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  52. Aledownload (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Aledownload (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  53. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Elvesham (talk) 20:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  54. Helmy oved (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Helmy oved 20:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  55. Ascánder (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Ascánder (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  56. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Definitely. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  57. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Richardkiwi (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  58. Rax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Rax (talk) 21:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  59. DCB (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   per MF-W DCB (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Lawrence142002 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Lawrence142002 (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  60. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Hoo man (talk) 22:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  61. Alan (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Alan (talk) 22:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Ayagaures 0 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Ayagaures 0 (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  62. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Thank you for your help reverting vandalism on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  63. Rxy (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   rxy (talk) 23:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  64. RadiX (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Long overdue. Outstanding candidate. RadiX 00:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  65. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   — xaosflux Talk 00:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  66. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Courcelles 01:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  67. MechQuester (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   MechQuester (talk) 02:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  68. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Did not vote on his RfS last year because it was "too soon", perfect now :) Stemoc 02:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  69. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 02:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  70. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Jusjih (talk) 04:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  71. NasssaNser (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   NasssaNser (talk) 04:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  72. Mirer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Mirer (talk) 05:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  73. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017   Shizhao (talk) 09:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  74. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017   MoiraMoira (talk) 10:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  75. InsaneHacker (Eligible, checked by TBloemink)2017   InsaneHacker (talk) 10:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  76. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Jerrykim306)2017   — TBloemink talk 11:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  77. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Rzuwig 11:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  78. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   спасибо за вашу помощь, в том числе на IRC Gryllida 11:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Openskye (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Openskye (talk) 12:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  79. Pokéfan95 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Pokéfan95 (talk) 12:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  80. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Excelent user! Good luck! Leon saudanha (talk) 14:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  81. Pigsonthewing (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  82. Udo T. (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   Udo T. (talk) 15:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  83. GeoO (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   --geo ») 15:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  84. CheChe (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   Great candidate. Best of luck. CheChe (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  85. BDaniel (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   BDaniel (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  86. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Joshualouie711 (talk) 17:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  87. Ankax Hayastan (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Hayordi (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Cpiebtanz (Not eligible, checked by Stryn)   Cpiebtanz (talk) 18:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  88. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 19:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  89. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Ghilt (talk) 19:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  90. Nutcracker100 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Nutcracker100 (talk) 19:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  91. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   ~Cybularny Speak? 19:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  92. Syum90 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Very active, competent and trustworthy, an excellent candidate in my opinion. Syum90 (talk) 20:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  93. Dave Braunschweig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Dave Braunschweig (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  94. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Just like last year: a no-brainer. He's trusted, active and certainly helpful. Trijnsteltalk 20:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  95. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   -Xbony2 (talk) 21:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  96. Sebek Adamowicz (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Sebek Adamowicz (talk) 21:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  97. Barras (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Yes please. A very good choice! Barras talk 21:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Theo10011 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Theo10011 (talk) 22:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  98. INeverCry (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   lNeverCry 02:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Earthscent (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Earthscent (talk) 02:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  99. Esmost (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Esmost (talk) 04:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  100. OneMember (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017   A bit early I admit, but seems ready. OneMember (talk) 06:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  101. Taichi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Taichi - (あ!) 08:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  102. Caligatus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   --Caligatus (talk) 09:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  103. Moheen Reeyad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   ~ Moheen (talk) 10:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  104. Hume42 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Hume42 (talk) 14:03, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  105. Epìdosis (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Epìdosis 14:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  106. CaroleHenson (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   CaroleHenson (talk) 16:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  107. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   I'd like to support everyone. Wolverène (talk) 17:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       John Locke (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Yes //John Locke (talk) 19:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  108. Samuele2002 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   It would be a great steward Samuele2002 (talk) 20:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  109. Sakhalinio (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Sakhalinio (talk) 21:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  110. SR5 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   SR5 (talk) 00:45, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  111. Full Rune (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Full Rune (talk) 01:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  112. Henryk Borawski (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Henryk Borawski (talk) 05:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  113. Hydriz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Hydriz (talk) 06:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  114. Taivo (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Taivo (talk) 08:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  115. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   eurodyne (talk) 08:34, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  116. Fastily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   FASTILY 10:06, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  117. Jcornelius (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Jcornelius (talk) 12:17, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  118. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   You seem to be trustful. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  119. Plasm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Plasm (talk) 14:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  120. Jbergner (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Jbergner (talk) 16:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  121. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Matanya (talk) 18:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  122. Coffins (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Coffins (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  123. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Anatoliy (talk) 20:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  124. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017  --თოგო (D) 21:16, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  125. La Mantis (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Rocío Mantis (talk) 22:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  126. Schnatzel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Schnatzel (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  127. Avraham (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Avi (talk) 05:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  128. Rollingcontributor (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Rollingcontributor (talk) 06:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  129. Holder (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017  --Holder (talk) 06:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  130. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Legoktm (talk) 08:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  131. Howan Hansi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Howan Hansi (talk) 08:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  132. Rauletemunoz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Rauletemunoz 10:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  133. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  134. Elmie (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Sounds like a helpful Steward Elmie (talk) 10:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  135. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  136. Hasive (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Hasivetalk 11:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  137. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   plenty of xwiki experience and intelligent decisions; content wiki adminship would be nice to see for dispute management, though should not restrict overly  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  138. Han-Jun Cho (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Thank you very much.Han-Jun Cho (talk) 13:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC) Han-Jun Cho (talk) 13:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  139. Naminsk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Naminsk (talk) 15:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  140. Silraks (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Silraks (talk) 15:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  141. Maynich (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Maynich (talk) 16:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  142. Mogoeilor (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   lrc lori (talk) 16:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  143. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Bpierreb (talk) 16:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  144. Melos (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Melos (talk) 20:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  145. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Ruthven (talk) 21:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  146. Min.neel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Min.neel (talk) 23:43, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  147. Nikolaiho (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Nikolaiho (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  148. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Az1568 (talk) 03:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  149. Kiraroshi1976 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 08:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
    Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 08:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  150. Shivanarayana (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Shivanarayana (talk) 13:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Marumari (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Marumari (talk) 15:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  151. Subscriptshoe9 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Subscriptshoe9 (talk) 15:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  152. ElGatoSaez (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Matiia is an excellent candidate and has all the skills to have the stewardship ElGatoSaez (talk) 17:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       GaboPV (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Me parece un acierto que haya un hispanoparlante como Steward! GaboPV (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Al-Baco (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Al-Baco (talk) 21:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  153. ArisMethymna (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   ArisMethymna (talk) 22:22, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  154. Sturgeontransformer (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017   Sturgeontransformer (talk) 02:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  155. Armineaghayan (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017   Good candidate ǃ ArmAg 05:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  156. JustBerry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   JustBerry (talk) 06:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  157. Buggia (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Buggia 11:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  158. Kayser Ahmad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Kayser Ahmad (talk) 12:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  159. Anglo-norman (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Anglo-norman (talk) 13:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  160. BuffaloBob (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   BuffaloBob (talk) 14:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  161. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   --Fenikals (talk) 15:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  162. MarioFinale (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Yep, an excellent candidate. ~ℳɑrio (talk) 16:17, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  163. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017   Centaur271188 (talk) 17:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  164. Muhraz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Muhraz (talk) 01:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  165. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  166. Lomeno 24 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017   Lomeno 24 (Contact me here) 03:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  167. Jmvkrecords (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Jmvkrecords (Intra talk) 07:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  168. DARIO SEVERI (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   talk 07:36, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  169. Imeriki al-Shimoni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Imeriki al-Shimoni (talk) 07:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  170. Tobovs (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Tobovs (talk) 09:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  171. Slashme (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Seems to have a careful, well-informed approach. Slashme (talk) 13:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  172. LeeKeoma (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   LeeKeoma (talk) 13:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  173. Popo le Chien (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Popo le Chien (talk) 15:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  174. Bff (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Bff (talk) 16:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  175. Lautaro 97 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017  . Lautaro 97 (talk) 16:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  176. Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (talk) 17:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  177. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Lepricavark (talk) 18:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  178. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Excellent candidate! A trusted and competent user with a lot of croswiki experience and good understanding of the policies. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 20:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  179. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Very reactive on CentralNotice requests :). Jules78120 (talk) 21:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  180. ArthurPSmith (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   ArthurPSmith (talk) 21:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  181. Pablísima (Eligible, checked by Lautaro 97)2017   Pablísima (talk) 23:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  182. Teles (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 01:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  183. Odder (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017   odder (talk) 02:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  184. Yikkayaya (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Yikkayaya (talk) 09:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  185. Meno25 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   The best in this election Meno25 (talk) 09:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  186. CactusWriter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   CactusWriter (talk) 15:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  187. Marcelo Victor (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Mvictor talk 17:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  188. Qolcomaq (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Qolcomaq (talk) 17:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  189. بدارين (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Excellent candidate. Good activity over the years! بدارين (talk) 23:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  190. جار الله (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   جار الله (talk) 02:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  191. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 10:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  192. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   DENAMAX (talk) 11:46, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       samer jabal (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   -- Samer jabal (talk) 12:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  193. Agronopolos (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017  ---- Agronopolos (talk) 13:02, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  194. Ce Ele 415 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017   Ce Ele 415 (talk) 15:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  195. KHMELNYTSKYIA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   KHMELNYTSKYIA (talk) 16:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  196. SM7 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Good candidate. --SM7 --talk-- 19:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  197. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Sounds like a very competent person to me! Dolotta (talk) 02:50, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  198. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   cyrfaw (talk) 08:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  199. Giorgos ab1234 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Giorgos ab1234 (talk) 11:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  200. Masum-al-hasan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Good candidate. Masum-al-Hasan (talk) 13:02, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  201. Deryni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Deryni (talk) 14:11, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  202. UaineSean (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   UaineSean (talk) 16:46, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  203. Geraki (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Geraki TL 19:18, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  204. MarcoAurelio (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   —MarcoAurelio 20:01, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  205. Miguu (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Miguu (talk) 20:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  206. Onverwacht (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Onverwacht (talk) 09:05, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Marchy088 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Marchy088 (talk) 09:43, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  207. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   İncelemeelemani (talk) 12:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  208. Smile4ever (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Smile4ever (talk) 12:59, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  209. AFlorence (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   AFlorence (talk) 22:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  210. Masti (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   masti <talk> 22:23, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  211. Foxj (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   — foxj 22:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  212. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Tvcccp (talk) 02:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  213. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Lsanabria (talk) 02:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Jvikings1 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Jvikings1 (talk) 04:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  214. Furado (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Furado (talk) 07:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  215. Yohannvt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Yohannvt (talk) 07:49, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  216. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   ArdiPras95 (talk) 09:23, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  217. Ivanhercaz (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Per Vogone and MF-Warburg. Ivanhercaz | User talk 11:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  218. XanaG (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   A thoughtful person, well versed in the policies. Xana (talk) 19:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  219. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   NaBUru38 (talk) 19:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Pngtblrs (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Pngtblrs (talk) 20:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  220. NS777 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   i thing he´s an excellen prospect NS777 (talk) 22:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC) & 22:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  221. DLeandroc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   DLeandroc 00:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  222. Миша Карелин (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   M.Karelin (talk) 05:31, 21 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Artur Franca (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Artur Franca (talk) 12:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  223. ThePlatypusofDoom (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 15:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  224. Murma174 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Murma174 (talk) 18:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Lethiernois (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Lethiernois (talk) 19:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  225. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Zyephyrus (talk) 22:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  226. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Litlok (talk) 08:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  227. Kenzia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Kenzia (talk) 10:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  228. Mr.User200 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Mr.User200 (talk) 13:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  229. RickinBaltimore (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  230. Karelj (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Karelj (talk) 17:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  231. Plagiat (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017   Plagiat (talk) 01:28, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  232. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Wae35244 (talk) 09:37, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  233. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gag0409 (talk) 13:47, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  234. Andrew Dalby (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Andrew Dalby (talk) 14:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  235. Язев (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Язев (talk) 19:33, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  236. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   I thank you for your contributions. It is an experienced user for cross-wiki. --Uğurkenttalk 20:00, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  237. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Matiia's English is better than he gives himself credit for, on top of speaking Spanish at a native level. He may not have the same breadth of experience as other candidates, but I feel confident that he can be trusted. Kurtis (talk) 20:05, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  238. Ukexpat (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017   ukexpat (talk) 02:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  239. Kelvin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Kelvin (talk) 08:55, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  240. Wieralee (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Wieralee (talk) 10:29, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  241. Cquoi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Cquoi (talk) 12:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  242. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   HMSLavender (talk) 17:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  243. Agremon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Agremon (talk) 20:27, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  244. Freddy2001 (Eligible, checked by Samuele2002)2017   Freddy2001 talk 22:10, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  245. Laura Fiorucci (Eligible, checked by Samuele2002)2017   Laura Fiorucci (talk) 02:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  246. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Experienced and active Shanmugamp7 (talk) 03:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  247. Mirinano (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Mirinano (talk) 04:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Ebear422 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Ebear422 (talk) 04:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  248. YaganZ (Eligible, checked by Melquíades)2017   YaganZ (talk) 07:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  249. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Melquíades)2017   Likely to be a solid addition to the Steward team. Has extensive experience as a global sysop and meta admin, but I do think Rschen7754 makes very valid points regarding the need to tread carefully where one might find themselves less confident and if elected you would do well to heed Rschen's advice. Snowolf How can I help? 07:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  250. Nan (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Nan (talk) 09:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  251. Melquíades (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Melquíades (msg) 09:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  252. Anniolek (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Anniolek (talk) 16:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  253. Elkelon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Elkelon (talk) 20:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  254. African Hope (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   African Hope (talk) 01:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  255. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Only possitive experiences with this user. Answers to the questions shows he understands of what is expected from a steward. Wiki13 talk 11:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  256. Bob Burkhardt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Bob Burkhardt (talk) 16:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  257. Gaeanautes (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gaeanautes (talk) 19:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  258. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   —DerHexer (Talk) 20:44, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  259. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Timk70 question? 21:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  260. Ptolusque (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017   Ptolusque (talk) 00:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  261. يوسف عاشق الجبل (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   يوسف عاشق الجبل (talk) 11:14, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  262. UAwiki (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   UAwiki (talk) 11:47, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply

No

[edit]
  1. Nuhaa (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017   Nuhaa (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  2. Alex Khimich (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Alex Khimich (talk) 09:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  3. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   The Banner (talk) 14:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Not enough knowledge of other languagesreply
  4. Complainer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Very promising candidate, but I think it's too soon. Complainer (talk) 15:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  5. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Slowking4 (talk) 02:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  6. KlaasZ4usV (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Only wants to block globally after not even three years editing knowing just English as a second languag? Over my dead body.  Klaas `Z4␟` V16:01, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  7. Shotgun pete (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Shotgun pete (talk) 16:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  8. Yscplus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Yscplus (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  9. Informationswiedergutmachung (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  10. Axpde (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   a×pdeHello! 10:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  11. Gridditsch (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Gridditsch (talk) 08:45, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  12. Edisonabcd (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Edisonabcd (talk) 11:45, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
    Plagiat (talk) 21:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC) changed my mindreply
  13. Gts-tg (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gts-tg (talk) 06:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  14. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Chris Troutman (talk) 12:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  15. Varina (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Varina (talk) 13:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  16. TmY e12 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   --TmѰ e12 15:29, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  17. J budissin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   j.budissin 13:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Wimmiden (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Wimmiden (talk) 10:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  18. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   This candidate has been involved with Wikimedia projects only two years. In a few years if this candidate is still interested, he/she would have enough experience. Wpollard (talk) 05:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  19. Nickrds09 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Nickrds09 (Talk to me) 10:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply

Neutral

[edit]
  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   While Matiia has some good crosswiki experience, they are not an administrator on a content wiki. Adminship on a content wiki shows both engagement with and understanding of the purpose of Wikimedia, demonstrates a level of trust that a candidate will not abuse their rights in a content dispute and proves that they can work collaboratively with others on sometimes difficult and contentious areas.
    With that being said, there are a lot of steward tasks, there is a shortage of active stewards (and a weaker candidate pool), and they have shown the ability to use the global sysop flag without much controversy, so I can't really oppose here either. If elected, I hope that you proceed cautiously in areas where you do not feel experienced, especially in those related to policy or dealing with wikis that no longer follow Wikimedia principles. Rschen7754 14:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  2. Rogi.Official (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Unknown Rogi 16:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  3. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Dostojewskij (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  4. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Rschen7754's comment sums up my views as well Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Predatorix (Not eligible, checked by Ks-M9)   Predatorix (talk) 23:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  5. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   ysjbserver (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  6. Épico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Épico (talk)/(contribs) 10:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  7. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   VictorBrice (talk) 11:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  8. OrbiliusMagister (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   εΔω 17:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC) WSNTreply
  9. Uchiha Itachi1990 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Uchiha Itachi1990 (talk) 13:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  10. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Rberchie (talk) 18:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  11. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Bestoernesto (talk) 07:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  12. Hatonjan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Hatonjan (talk) 13:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  13. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Bernd Bergmann (talk) 22:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  14. Xneb20 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Xneb20 (talk) 12:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  15. Gampe (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gampe (talk) 05:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  16. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Cbyd (talk) 22:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Patrickwooldridge (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Patrickwooldridge (talk) 00:49, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  17. Zozoulia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Zozoulia (talk) 17:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  18. Seven twentynine (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Seven twentynine (talk) 06:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  19. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Dash77 (talk) 04:41, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  20. Ahmer Jamil Khan (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   No objections, can't decide. Ahmer Jamil Khan (talk) 12:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply