Stewards/Elections 2019/Votes/Praxidicae

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Praxidicae[edit]

ContentsYesNoNeutral
Praxidicae talk • contribs • accounts (stalktoy) • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility  — Translate: translation help, statement, template
  • Languages: EN-n
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hi! I'm Praxidicae. I am currently a global sysop and administrator on Mediawiki, account creator on the English Wikipedia, abuse filter helper and OTRS agent and through these rights, I frequently deal with sensitive, private information. My primary focus is combating cross-wiki spam, vandalism and harassment, especially dealing with spambots, which I have extensive experience identifying, deleting and blocking, where permitted, as well as collaborating with various projects to identify strings for abuse filters to prevent spam and vandalism. Ultimately I am running to help abate the extensive problem of cross-wiki abuse, outside of typical childish vandalism.


    Having been the subject myself of targeted harassment in real life that stemmed from on-wiki abuse, I am hoping to also work with the Wikimedia Foundation through this role to create a healthier environment for editors and find additional resources to help those who may also be targeted in this way. I hope for the community's trust and support.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2019/Questions#Praxidicae


Emblem-important.svg
If you have JavaScript enabled, you can easily vote with a Vote! button which will appear in the place of this notice. If you would prefer to add your vote manually, please add:
# {{Se-vote|2019|Your username|checked=|cb=}} <optional comments>. ~~~~
to the bottom of the appropriate Yes, No or Neutral section.

Pictogram voting support.svg Yes[edit]

  1. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   --Stïnger (会話) 14:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  2. JOAN (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   --JOAN ~ (Questions?) 14:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  3. Cohaf (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019  Clear demonstrated need and competency. As per my SRGP comments when they are applying for GS. I will hope they will understand local policies well before doing any actions, and more gentle communication with community. However, I don't see any chance she will misuse the tools and I am not impressed that if a candidate needs to be a major wiki sysops as smaller wikis are what Stewards are involved most, the GR/GS experience makes up for it.--Cohaf (talk) more details of my vote here 14:25, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  4. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   don’t ordinarily like people who are not admins on a content wiki, but I trust Praxidicae. She is probably the single most active person in steward related responses to x-wiki abuse, and most of this is done via IRC, so it can’t be diff’d to. She may be controversial on en, but in terms of cross-wiki work there are few if any people better suited to be a steward. Strong support. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  5. Barkeep49 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019  Works diligently in all areas of her Wikimedia work, which have been increasingly focused on x-wiki issues, namely abuse and spam. While she has strong opinions, she is more than willing to double check her first impressions. I have no doubt she would be an active, collobrative member of the steward team. Barkeep49 (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  6. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  7. Bradv (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Very active and competent vandal- and spam-fighter. Always willing to learn and collaborate with others, meaning she'll make a great steward. Strong support. Bradv🍁 15:03, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  8. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   I'd like, and I'll surely see, a bit more laziness. --15:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  9. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Ankry (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  10. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  11. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Even though they're not an admin on an individual project, I very much like to work with them and they could use the tools well. I have confidence in them. Trijnsteltalk 15:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  12. Vermont (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Highly active anti-LTA and anti-spam editor crosswiki. User:Vermont/SE/2019#Praxidicae Vermont (talk) 15:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  13. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   Just about meets my threshold for a steward. I don't see her as controversial, and she works hard in anti-vandalism; however, concerns about the lack of en.wiki RfA are valid. Overall, weak support. Leaderboard (talk) 15:42, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  14. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by علاء)2019   No content wiki adminship, but seems sensible and active. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  15. Kaviraf (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2019   Kaviraf (talk) 16:36, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  16. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   Lack of content sysop experience not a concern. Miniapolis 16:39, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  17. Dlohcierekim (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   Full trust. Full support. Seen her around enwiki. She is sensible and active. per TonyBallioni et al.. "net positive" would be an understatement. Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  18. FR30799386 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   FR30799386 (talk) 16:56, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  19. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   cyrfaw (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  20. SQL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   SQLQuery me! 19:00, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  21. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Novak Watchmen (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  22. Tks4Fish (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   Even though she's not a sysop on a wiki (albeit being a global one), she is extremely active on LTA and spambot fighting, which, as TonyBallioni has already mentioned, is done via IRC, so unfortunately not visible to anyone that's not currently there, but can be easily viewed by staying a little bit in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 19:29, 8 February 2019 (UTC) Edited: —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 19:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  23. Mz7 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Mz7 (talk) 19:50, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  24. stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   stwalkerster (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  25. Primefac (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Primefac (talk) 20:31, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  26. Swarm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Highly qualified Swarm (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  27. Majora (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Highly, highly qualified to be a steward. Steward is not a content role. Praxidicae has demonstrated an ability to work with all languages as a global sysop and a knowledge of areas of steward concern such as cross-wiki LTAs. Their actions show that they can be a great steward. Majora (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  28. Pórokhov (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Per Tks4Fish. Highly qualified.Pórokhov (talk) 21:21, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  29. Rax (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   support - like Majora. -- Rax (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  30. Geom (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Geom Habla conmigo 21:41, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  31. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Even I think a steward should definitely have some experience as a sysop, Praxidicae is a global sysop and that should be enough from my side. Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:51, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  32. TheSandDoctor (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Highly qualified/net positive. Lack of content sysop experience is not a concern for me in this case. --TheSandDoctor Talk 22:05, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  33. AGK (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   I think this user has the right experience and skills. AGK ■ 22:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  34. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   Complete support - Praxidicae's judgement is one that I admire heavily and I have confidence that whatever inexperience can be quickly made up for. Hiàn (talk) 22:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  35. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   I do think that more experience with advanced permissions would be beneficial here, but I also appreciate her existing experience dealing with cross-wiki abuse and think that she could build on that to quickly adapt to the new role. If you are unsuccessful this year, please do stick around and try again in the future after addressing some of the concerns. Many of our best stewards weren't elected on the first try. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:57, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  36. XXBlackburnXx (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   XXBlackburnXx (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  37. L235 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Kevin (aka L235 · t · c · enwiki) 00:14, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  38. Veracious (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Fully supporting. Veracious (talk) 03:39, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  39. Muhraz (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Muhraz (talk) 04:43, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  40. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   –Ammarpad (talk) 05:49, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  41. NMW03 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   NMW03 (talk) 07:29, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  42. Abelmoschus Esculentus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk) 09:08, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  43. BugWarp (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   BugWarp (talk) 14:51, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  44. Ayagaures 0 (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019   Ayagaures 0 (talk) 16:02, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  45. Santasa99 (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019   Santasa99 (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  46. Gog the Mild (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   Gog the Mild (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  47. Érico (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   After reviewing the comments and the answers to the questions, I change to support, largely per Ajraddatz. Érico (talk) 18:26, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  48. Nick (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   I find myself agreeing with Tony and Ajraddatz - more content writing experience would be useful in the case of Praxidicae, but as Majora points out, steward is not a content role. It's a more technical role, with a series of restrictive policies that generally prevent a steward from involving themselves in the types of content related disputes you would find yourself becoming involved with as an administrator.
    I have worked extensively with Praxidicae (she routinely pesters me to deal with copyright violations on Commons and socks on English Wikipedia) and she's got the a sixth sense for spotting socks, something I see in few users, even those admins who work in SPI. I trust her judgement, even when I can't actually work out why she's right, it almost always falls into place and it's spooky, seriously. Nick (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  49. AfroThundr3007730 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 19:55, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  50. Mbrickn (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Mbrickn (talk) 21:44, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  51. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Has a clue and good x-wiki experience as a GS. --Cameron11598 (talk) 23:47, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  52. K.e.coffman (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Trusted contributor; thank you for volunteering. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:18, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  53. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Savh)2019   Linedwell [talk] 08:55, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  54. Arystanbek (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Arystanbek (talk) 09:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  55. Operator873 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Net positive for the community. Dedicated to xwiki abuse prevention. Small concerns about how she reacts to things at times, but this doesn't detract from the good work she puts into the community. Operator873talkconnect 17:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  56. Iluvatar (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Iluvatar (talk) 20:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  57. AntiCompositeNumber (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  58. Drewmutt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   With all her xwiki sock sniffing abilities, she's an obvious net positive. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 23:34, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  59. Techso01 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Techso01 (talk) 05:32, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  60. Otourly (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Otourly (talk) 07:17, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  61. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   It's pretty hard for me to understand why people think mediawiki.org is not a "content wiki". It has plenty of content, it just has a different audience than other Wikimedia projects. If people think adminship (with our non-broken process for handing out +sysop) on mediawiki.org shouldn't qualify for being eligible to be a steward candidate, then that should be fixed before the election instead of opposing candidates who do meet the previously-agreed upon requirements. Legoktm (talk) 07:18, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  62. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Shizhao (talk) 08:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  63. BRPever (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   BRP ever 14:16, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  64. Kb03 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019   Kb03 (talk) 14:17, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  65. Britishfinance (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2019   Britishfinance (talk) 15:43, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
       Levityn (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Levityn (talk) 16:01, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  66. There'sNoTime (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Unwavering confidence - TNT 💖 19:10, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  67. Euro know (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Euro know (talk) 19:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  68. Amorymeltzer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   As noted above, Praxidicae is incredibly vigilant fighting cross-wiki abuse and spam, and is a huge benefit to the global community. She's good at this stuff. I note the no votes, which in anyone else would give me pause, but only good would come of Praxidicae as a steward. ~ Amory (utc) 20:40, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  69. علاء (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Strong Support. She is very active in fighting cross-wiki abuse/vandals/spammers and LTAs. I think, she will be a good addition for steward team. (+ Per TonyBallioni, Majora and Ajraddatz) --Alaa :)..! 23:49, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  70. Galahad (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 03:08, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  71. فيصل (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Faisal talk 03:14, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  72. Johanna-Hypatia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Johanna-Hypatia (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  73. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Really great at xwiki stuff and a clear need for tools. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 08:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  74. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Centaur271188 (talk) 08:30, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  75. Krd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Krd 09:08, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  76. QEDK (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   QEDK (talkenwiki) 15:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
       Aabbccddeeffabcdef (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   La présentation me semble bonne. Aabbccddeeffabcdef (talk) 17:37, 12 February 2019 (UTC).
  77. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Richardkiwi (talk) 20:03, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  78. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   DannyS712 (talk) 21:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  79. Drmies (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   What TonyBallioni says. And Trijnstel. And Mike. And others. Drmies (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  80. Defender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Defender (talk) 12:54, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  81. Saig Keryann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Saig Keryann (talk) 14:37, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  82. Sj (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   ++ for thoughtfulness and cross-wiki attention, an essential part of having a healthy global environ. –SJ talk  17:09, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  83. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   without hesitation; demonstrably and truly knows their way around the small and medium wikis, their spambots and their vandals; is attentive to detail and applies due respect to their processes, something clearly required for stewards. Has had to deal with trolls, and manages them effectively. Meh! to calls for extensive content wiki experience, it is not a priority to this role against the xwiki spam, small/medium wiki rights, and keeping a level-head.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:24, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  84. TheDragonFire (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   TheDragonFire (talk) 13:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  85. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Vermont)2019   Uğurlar arzu edirəm! ►Cekli829 10:25, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  86. StraussInTheHouse (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2019   Most competent LTA tracker I've come across, I strongly support this candidacy. SITH (talk) 12:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
       Rprpr (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Rprpr (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  87. Ymnes (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   Ymnes (talk) 17:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  88. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   ArdiPras95 (talk) 19:41, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  89. Eihel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Eihel (talk) 11:25, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose.svg No[edit]

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   - Not an admin at a content wiki, which leads to experience concerns, and also I don't have a good read on where they stand with policies. In my opinion ACC and OTRS have a lower bar of entry, and neither really deal with the sort of CU/OS private data that one would have access to as a steward - ACC provides IP addresses of new editors, not necessarily those that are already established). The incident that I mentioned in the questions didn't really leave me with a great impression - though it may have been a one-off sort of thing and maybe it's a bit unfair to focus on that one thing, I haven't really noticed the candidate in a different setting and so I'm not sure what that says either. --Rschen7754 14:04, 8 February 2019 (UTC) (Note: I would be willing to reconsider in a future year with more experience). --Rschen7754 01:29, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  2. 無聊龍 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Oppose as the candidate shows limited ability in cross-language cross-wiki collaboration, in particular unwillingness to respect local community policies, conventions, procedures and consensus. 無聊龍 (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
    Érico (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   Per Rschen7754. Érico (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  3. Nihlus (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   Inexperience. Nihlus 14:28, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  4. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Not enough experience in cross-wiki matters. But do keep up the good work; I would consider supporting next year.—Jasper Deng (talk) 15:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  5. Clinamental (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Clinamental (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  6. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Opposing due to lack of current administration or functionary positions on any content related projects. — xaosflux Talk 15:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  7. AINH (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   Oppose as the candidate shows a lack of understanding of many basic policies such as AFD and SD on other projects according to my observation on IRC AINH (talk) 15:41, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  8. Stang (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Stang 16:39, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  9. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   not enough experience Dolotta (talk) 16:59, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  10. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   Steinsplitter (talk) 17:29, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  11. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   As per Rschen. MZaplotnik(talk) 17:31, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  12. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   Fenikals (talk) 17:32, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  13. MrX (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   MrX (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  14. AT (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   AT (talk) 20:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  15. Informationswiedergutmachung (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  16. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   Gereon K. (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  17. Count Count (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   --Count Count (talk) 22:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  18. Super Wang (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 06:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  19. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Lacks the requisite temperament. ——SerialNumber54129 07:25, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  20. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   per Rschen7754 KPFC💬 10:49, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  21. Brainswiffer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Brainswiffer (talk) 11:45, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  22. EVinente (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   I agree with Rschen7754 EVinente (talk) 12:16, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  23. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   Not enough experience IMHO –Davey2010Talk 17:54, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  24. Flooded with them hundreds (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Flooded with them hundreds 18:35, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  25. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Too soon and English as the only language is a concern to put me here —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 19:17, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  26. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019   Mirer (talk) 04:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  27. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   concerns with limited administrative experience on a content wiki FASTILY 07:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  28. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Insufficient cross wiki/admin experience Herby talk thyme 11:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  29. Widr (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Widr (talk) 13:06, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  30. Artregor (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Artregor (talk) 14:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  31. Man77 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   as always my "No" to monolingual stewards → «« Man77 »» [de] 16:56, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  32. Soul Train (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   One language in the international project? No, thanks. Soul Train (talk) 22:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  33. Steindy (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   Steindy (talk) 00:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  34. Küñall (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019   Küñall (talk) 02:52, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  35. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   *Youngjin (talk) 08:31, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  36. MarioFinale (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   The fact that he (apparently) only speaks english will likely translate on some cross-wiki communication problems. ~ℳɑrio (talk) 17:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  37. Fish and karate (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Fish and karate (talk) 11:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  38. 1.02 editor (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   as per above, I feel that being proficient in only one language will be a big problem as a steward 1.02 editor (talk) 11:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  39. Dweller (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019   per many arguments above, but thank you for standing Dweller (talk) 13:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  40. L293D (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   L293D ( • ) 21:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  41. Wildly boy (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Wildly boy (talk) 01:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  42. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Per Rschen7754. Natuur12 (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  43. Simplexity22 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Simplexity22 (talk) 19:59, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  44. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   MelanieN (talk) 22:48, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  45. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Just no, the English-only users are always unhelpful in Meta-Wiki Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:23, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  46. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   Kudpung (talk) 17:23, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  47. DGG (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   DGG (talk) 07:14, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  48. გიო ოქრო (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   გიო ოქრო (talk) 23:03, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  49. Pamputt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Agree with Rschen7754 Pamputt (talk) 10:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral[edit]

  1. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   I think she is on the right track, however, I do not think he has traveled that path long enough to embark on being steward. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 14:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Mixed impression. Might be a good candidate in the future. Vogone (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  3. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   I can't oppose someone who has a high track record of xwiki work and a helpful attitude. However, it isn't just about it. Without being sysop on a content wiki she may lack experience on many areas. Esteban16 (talk) 17:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  4. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   per Esteban16 Mahir256 (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  5. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Wetterwolke (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  6. 隼鷹 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   隼鷹 (talk) 23:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  7. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Per Vogone — Bukhari (Talk!) 07:42, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  8. 1233 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   As pointed by some of the people who oppose and support and to be neutral (yes this can be omitted), you lack experience, though most, if not all of his actions, are done in good faith.--1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 08:52, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  9. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Might be a good candidate in the future ! - DePlusJean (talk) 19:01, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  10. Antanana (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   アンタナナ 00:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  11. Stanglavine (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Rafael (stanglavine) msg 00:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  12. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   WikiBayer (talk) 08:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  13. Alan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Alan (talk) 14:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  14. Piotr Bart (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Piotr Bart (talk) 18:28, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  15. B20180 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   B20180 (talk) 19:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  16. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Dostojewskij (talk) 22:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  17. Mahveotm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Mahveotm (talk) 23:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  18. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   ~Cybularny Speak? 11:13, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  19. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   Eurodyne (talk) 00:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  20. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Good luck! Wolverène (talk) 07:12, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  21. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 10:51, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  22. 水瀬悠志 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   水瀬悠志 (talk) 01:48, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  23. Aleator (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   Excellent x-wiki, but I'd prefer a longer track record. Aleator (talk) 16:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  24. Tomybrz (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019   per Vogone comment Tomybrz Bip Bip 16:23, 16 February 2019 (UTC)